Loading...
1972/11/0772 -718 City Hell, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Lou Rohrs of the West Anaheim Methodist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. P'IOCIi1IA TION: Mayor Dutton proclaimed the week of November 13th "Youth Appreciation Week said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: W. Frank Campagnoni, of the City Personnel Department, introduced 39 new employees attending the Council Meeting as part of the City's orientation program. Mayor Dutton welcomed the new employees. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings held October 10 and October 17, 1972 were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF J$ADI1 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UANAIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,252,953.75, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC H RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-25: Initiated by the City Planning Com- mission, to change the zone from County of Orange Al to City of Anaheim R-A on property located on the. south side of Winston Road, east of State College Boulevard. (Winston Road No. 1 Annexation) On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the action before them, was re- classifying recently annexed property into a holding zone and no Environmental Impact Report was required. MOTION CARRIED. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -249, recommended approval of said reclassification unconditionally. Mr. Roberts noted that *1 Zoning for subject property has been commenced under Reclassification No. 71-72 -36. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to be heard; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ouguON NO. 721-514: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R-514 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone to R -A as recommended by the City Planning Commission. t` Refer to Resolution Book. 72-719 City 11$11. Aheim. California COUNCIL NIINUTE November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72-73-25 R-A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -514 duly passed and adopted. VARIANCE NO. 2449 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 6: At their October 18, 1972 meeting, the City Planning Commission considered Variance No. 2449 and E.I.R. No. 6 which were submitted by London, Weil Company in conjunction with re- quest to move an existing dwelling onto R -0 zoned property located at the south side of North Street, west of West Street, with waiver of: a. Minimum ground floor living area. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -251, recommended E.I.R. No. 6 be adopted as Council's statement, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-250, denied Variance No. 2449. Mr. Roberts informed the Council that the plans submitted with request for the housemoving indicate that the house would be enlarged to 2,000 square feet by enlarging and converting the garage into living area, thus making the variance for code waiver of minimum ground floor living area unnecessary. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that the housemoving proposal is trivial in nature and no significant impact on the environment would result. MOTION CARRIED. No further action was taken on Variance No. 2449. PUBLIC HEARING HHOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Mr. John Krajacic, requesting permission to move a structure from 1105 North La Palma Circle, to 1104 West North Street was reviewed by the City Council together with a re- port of the Development Services Department, recommending said permit be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That the driveway shall be installed along North Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall, pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along North Street for tree plant- ing purposes. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along North Street for street lighting purposes. 4. That the existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 5. That the owner(s) of the subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -liep fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 6. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that a building permit is issued. 7. That Condition Nos. 1 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the final building and zoning inspecti,s. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present, and concurred with the recommendations of the Development Services Department, to which Mr. Krajacic replied in the affirmative. 1 72-720 The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RBSOLUTION NO. 72R-515: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. /2R -515 for adoption, granting said housemoving permit subject to the conditions recommended by the Development Services Department. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO MR. JOHN KRAJACIC, TO MOVE A DWELLING /BUILDING FROM 1105 NORTH LA PALMA CIRCLE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, TO 1104 WEST NORTH STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-515 duly passed and adopted. ENTERTAIN PERMIT: Application filed by Joe D. Stalcup, for entertainment permit, to allow a one, two or three piece band at Top Hat, 180 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Muni- cipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police on motion by Councilman Stephen- son, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING CO MISS ;ON ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 18, 1972 pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS NO. 2 PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1350 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8101. NO. 3 PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1347 AND TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 8104, 8140, 8141 AND 8142. NO. 4 PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1348 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7915, REVISION NO. 1. filed by Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures Inc., together with Addendum thereto submitted this date were presented. Also presented was City Planning Commission recommendations and Review Committee Analysis pertaining to said Environmental Impact Reports. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC72 -256, PC72 -257 and PC72 -258 recommended said E.I.R.'s and Addendum be adopted as statements of the City Council. Mr. Roberts briefed the Analysis of the E.I.R. Review Committee finding, in their opinion, such items as noise, socia economic' impact (schools, recreation facilities), landform and the natural systems and grading were not discussed adequately, however, these items were thoroughly discussed at the Planning Commission hearing, and the developer requested to place statements made at that time in writing. Said addendums were submitted too late for analysis by the E.I.R. Review Committee. W. Roberts further noted that an overall Environmental Impact Report had been submitted some time ago by Anaheim Hills Inc. for their entire Planned Community, but since this was an all encompassing report, the developer has been asked to submit supplemental reports regarding each individual project on which the Council's statement will be based. 72 -721 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTJS Novembe 7, 1972 1:30 P.M. The following were areas which the E.I.R. Review Committee felt the Council might wish additional information, and the City Planning Com- mission concurred and incorporated into their resolutions a request that statements regarding these elements be prepared in written form and submitted as an addendum: a. Specific locations of school sites intended to serve the area. b. Secondary vehicular circulation. c. Public Utilities. d. Recreation facilities. e. Type of landscaping planned for slope areas. f. Grading techniques to be used on slopes. Mr. Roberts reported the Committee felt the major areas under the Council's guideline have been adequately explored. However, additional areas suggested for consideration on major projects may not have been ex- plored to the depth desired and that the Council may wish additional input on public utilities, community facilities and public services. As to effects of vehicle access and transportation within the area, Mr. Roberts noted that when the planned community area was originally con- sidered together with general plan amendment 123A a great deal of thought and consideration were given to the traffic projected in the area and whether or not the street facilities planned would be sufficient to accommodate the anticipated amount of traffic that would be generated by these developments. It was the opinion of the Traffic Engineer that the number of trips generated by the 675 acre planned community could be accommodated by the street system proposed. One potential problem not covered was getting vehicles in or out of the area in the event of a natural disaster. As of now Anaheim Hills Road and Nohl Ranch Road are the only means of access into the area of the ranch presently proposed for development which is near the Anaheim Hills Golf Course and approximately one mile from the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Anaheim Hills Road. He stated that in the event of a disaster such as a mud slide or earthquake it was conceivable that Anaheim Hills Road or Nohl Ranch Road could be cut off to the point an emergency vehicle could not get in nor could the people get out of the area. Regarding public utilities, Mr. Roberts noted that the report indicated the city would provide these services according to policy. However the report does not address itself to any fiscal problems from the stand- point of availability or time schedule in getting utilities there. Regarding noise, Mr. Roberts noted that according to the City Attorney's recent ruling, noise impact was property considered with zoning cases. He also noted that the three E.I.R.'s before the Council are in conjunction with zoning actions noted on the agenda. As to school facilities, Mr. Roberts reported that the E.I.R. indicated that school locations and numbers would be determined with the school district at the appropriate time. Recreation facilities in the report did not interrelate any of the equestrian, riding or hiking trails with the specific developments. Mr. James Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills Inc., reminded the Council that the E.I.R.s now under consideration, are supplemental reports and all refer to property located within the Planned Community Zone which is discussed in a great amount of detail in the original Environmental Impact Report submitted for that entire project. He. advised that during the public hearings before the City Planning Commission on these specific de- velopments of Hallcraft Homes Inc. and American Housing Guild, the City Planning Commission was of the opinion that the supplemental reports did not necessarily cover all items. As a result supplements to the original supplements were prepared and filed. He apologized for the fact that the additional supplements were only received this morni* and stated this was not their intent. T 72-722 City Hall. jpaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Barisic stated that in the last supplements filed they endeavored to address themselves to some of the questions raised by the City Planning Com- mission and staff. Such as, the circulation element in this area, public util- ities, impact of noise, recreation element plus an additional item, not neces- sarily required in an E.I.R., but important which is the school element and how the school population will be provided for. He noted that they have had a number of meetings with the School District. He further stated that the project engineer, Mr. Horace Shore, was present and prepared to answer any questions Council may have. Councilman Thom stated that in light of the fact that these proposed developments will contain 122, 220 and 252 dwelling units, the developer should consider in greater depth in the E.I.R. such categories as our interim guide- lines prior to action by the City Council. Mr. Gerald Vind, 259 Solomon Drive, addressed the Council and re- quested delay of any decision regarding these E.I.R.s and conditional use permits to provide more time for study. He based his request on the following five points: 1. He was concerned about insufficient community involvement in these decisions and the fact that the supplemental reports were not made avail- able to the public. 2. That these E.I.R.s are being reviewed internally by City staff, whereas he thinks the City, because we do not have a conservation element in the general plan, is required under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 to go to other affected agencies for their concurrence. 3. He stated that according to his understanding amendments have been made to the grading ordinance which might be challenged as not in confor- mity with prudent engineering practice, and in the event of a mudslide this could cause liability to the City. 4. The constitutional consideration of City liability under inverse condemnation for the associated public improvements to the Anaheim Hills area. 5. Lack of coordination in planning with the Orange Unified School District. Mr. Geisler informed Mr. Vind that there is no requirement under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 that the City go to other govern- mental agencies for concurrence as he had stated. He further informed him that the supplemental items just submitted is not the required E.I.R. but an addendum to it with supplemental information requested and the hearing on the E.I.R. was held three weeks ago by the City Planning Commission, at which hearing there was ample opportunity for public input on these E.I.R.s and conditional use permits. He further stated that the vehicle Mr. Vind or any other interested party should employ to state objections to E.I.R.s or actions on conditional use permits at this time would be to file a formal appeal. Mr. Barisic extended an invitation to Mr. Vind to come to their office and review all their plans. He further advised that the supplements just received were only written statements of oral testimony given at the City Planning Commission hearing. Councilman Thom reiterated that he had not received this supplemental report in sufficient time for review, and feels it is not extensive enough according to the interim guidelines for major projects and that the seismic risk potential has not had ample consideration. Mr. Geisler advised that although the Council may wish to consider the seismic risk potential, and establish rules and regulati *ns in relation to building code and grading, or adopt a seismic element to the General Plan, this would be a separate and distinct factor and not a part of the environmental element of the General Plan. Any rules and regulations Council wishes to im- pose regarding the seismic element would have to be uniform and apply to all areas of the City and since these are not in existence at the present time, it is not possible to make this a requirement in connection witl this particular discussion. He stated that at this particular time they are considering making a statement as to the effect of the proposed project on the existing ecological balance, and it is not possible to state that the proposed development will cause seismic disturbance. City Hall. An aheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1912. 1;30 P.M. Councilman Thom stated that the seismic element has been included in the E.I.R.s submitted by Anaheim Hills Inc., but not to the extent which he deems necessary. 72-723 Mr. Geisler stated that most of these reports are prepared not only for the City but also in connection with HUD Financing, which agency is interested in many other factors, only some of which are parallel to the City's environmental concern. Councilman Thom stated that he still feels that a seismic distur- bance would cause a more disastrous effect in the hill areas than on the flat land and therefore deserves more attention in these reports. He further stated that these addendums to the E.I.R.s do not go broadly enough into those categories listed in Exhibit No. B of our interim guidelines, and addi- tionally he would hesitate to vote on something he has not had an opportunity to read thoroughly. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT NO. 2 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1350): On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council accepted the E.I.R. No. 2 and with addendum and committee analysis as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. To this motion Councilman Thom voted "no MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1350: Submitted by Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures Inc., to establish a 122 -unit planned residential development on proposed R -2 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Serrano Avenue and Nohl Ranch Road, with waivers of: a. Lot frontage. b. Minimum building site area. c. Minimum building site width. d. Maximum building height within 150 feet of an R -A Zone. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -252, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 8101 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-44): Developer, Hallcraft Homes, Inc., property located at the southeast corner of Serrano Avenue and Nohl Ranch Road; containing approximately 25 acres proposed for subdivision into 122 R -2 zoned lots. (Conditional Use Permit No. 1350) The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 18, 1972, approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8101 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 1350. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that t approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Roa4 through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to com- mencement of structural framing. 72-724 City a 11. Anaheim, California COUj IL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. 8. That minimum 25 -foot curb radii shall be provided at intersections of private streets with Serrano Avenue. 9. That the property lines shall be a minimum of one foot back of top of slopes as required in Section 17.06.110(b) of City of Anaheim Municipal Code. 10. That Serrano Avenue shall be 38 feet wide from centerline of street to property line. 11. That a minimum 28 -foot wide public access easement shall be provided from Serrano Avenue to west tract boundary over street indicated as "28 -foot access road On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 8101 was approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 3 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1347): On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council ac- cepted Environmental Impact Report No. 3 with addendum and Committee analysis and adopted same as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in com- pliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. To this motion Councilman Thom voted "no MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1347: Submitted by Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures Inc., to establish a 252 -unit planned residential development on pro- posed R -2 zoned property located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, north of Serrano Avenue with waivers of: a. Lot frontage. b. Minimum building site area. c. Minimum building site width. d. Maximum building height within 150 feet of an R -A Zone. e. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -253, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8104 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 72-44) Developer, American Housing Guild; property located at the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, approxi- mately 1,000 feet north of Serrano Avenue; containing 53 proposed R -2 zoned lots (Conditional Use Permit No. 1347). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 30, 1972, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8104 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -44 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1347. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof'shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval ion s, and rethe final tract ions recorded apprAed the covenants, co tract nits, and map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall sub- mit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the pro posed functioning of the operating corporation, including bunt limited to the articles of incorporation bylaws, proposed methods of manag nt, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 1 72-725 City Hall. Anagagim. Cplifornia COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. Thtt the full traveled way of Park Ridge Road within or adjacent to subject tract shall be constructed concurrently with, or prior to, the construction of the improvements for this tract or otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 11. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings, to Nohl Ranch Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 12. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 8104 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 8140 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-44): Developer American Housing Guild; property located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Serrano Avenue; containing 63 proposed R -2 zoned lots. (Conditional Use Permit No. 1347). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 30, 1972, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8140 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -44 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1347. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation, including but not limited to the art- icles of incorporation bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agree- ments may be made available to the developers of saiCproperty upon their request. 72-726 City Hall_ Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November Z. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That the full traveled way of Park Ridge Road within or adjacent to subject tract shall be constructed concurrently with, or prior to, the construction of the improvements for this tract or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 11. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to com- mencement of structural framing. 12. That Anaheim Hills, Inc. shall post a bond ensuring the landscap- ing, irrigation and maintenance and enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to otherwise ensure the landscaping, irrigation and maintenance of the manufactured fill slopes adjacent to the tract's eastern boundary prior to the approval of the final tract map. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 8140 was approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 8141 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71- 72 -44) Developer, American Housing Guild; property located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Serrano Avenue; containing 70 proposed R -2 zoned lots. (Conditional Use Permit No. 1347) The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 30, 1972, approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8141 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -44 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1347. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation, including but not limited to the articles of incorporation bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other infor- mation as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ulti- mate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made avialable to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project.; 10. That the full traveled way of Park Ridge Road within or adjacent to subject tract shall be constructed concurrently with, or prior to, the con- struction of the improvements for this tract or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. T 72- 727 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 11. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 12. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings, to Nohl Ranch Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 8141 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 8142,(RECLASSIFICATI0N NO. 71- 72 -44): Developer, American Housing Guild; property located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Serrano Avenue; containing 66 proposed R -2 zoned lots. (Conditional Use Permit No. 1347) The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 30, 1972, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8142 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -44 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1347. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation, including but not limited to the art- icles of incorporation bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That the full traveled way of Park Ridge Road within or adjacent to subject tract shall be constructed concurrently with, or prior to, the construction of the improvements for this tract or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 11. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commence- ment of structural framing. 12. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings, to Nohl Ranch Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 8142 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. 72-728 City Hall, Anaheim Cifornia COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 4 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 1348): On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council accepted E.I.R. No. 4 with addendum and Committee analysis and adopted same as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. To This motion Councilman Thom voted "no MOTION CARRIED. CONDIZIO ►L USE PERMIT NO. 1348: This petition was submitted by Anaheim Hills Inc., and Texaco Ventures Inc., to establish a 220 -unit planned residential development on proposed R -2 zoned property located on the south side of Serrano Avenue, east of Nohl Ranch Road, with waivers of: a. Lot frontage. b. Minimum building site area. c. Minimum building site width. d. Maximum building height within 150 feet of an R -A Zone. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -254, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. No further action was taken by the City Council. TENTATIVE MAP. TACT NO. 7915. REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION N9. 71- 72 -44): Developer, Hallcraft Homes, Inc.; property located on the south side of Serrano Avenue, 1,235 feet east of Nohl Ranch Road; containing 220 proposed R -2 (PC) zoned lots. (Conditional Use Permit No. 1348). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held October 18, 1972, approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7915, Revision granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 1348. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for No. 1, is division, approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 7. That minimum 25 -foot radius curb returns shall be provided at intersections of private streets with Serrano Avenue. 8. That Serrano Avenue shall be 38 feet wide from centerline of street to property line. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Tentative Map, Tract No. 7915, Revision No. 1, was approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ENV nip= REPORT NO. 33 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71 -55. VARIANCE NO. AND TSACT 7416): E.I.R. No. 33 and Review Committee Analysis pertaining to Tract No. 7416, located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, east of Concerto Drive, proposed for a 318 -unit, two-story condominium complex, was submitted. Mr. Roberts briefed the Council on the findings of the Review Committee, stating that the Committee considered the report yesterday and found some areas in which Council may wish to require further information, specifically regarding plans to accommodate additional runoff, noise levels and recreational amenities. City Hall, Ana eim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 72 -729 Councilman Thom stated he felt the E.I.R. was incomplete as a project to build 318 -units would be a major project necessitating application of Exhibit No. B of the interim guidelines prior to approval of the finai tract map. Discussion regarding the analysis concerning recreational amenities was held; which analysis indicates that these amenities have not been itemized or indicated on the plot plan. Mr. William Lyon, President, W. L. Builders Corp., 366 San Mi guel Drive, Newport Beach, stated that recreation facilities were included and were shown on the tentative tract map approved by the City Council in August of 1971. Said tentative map was reviewed at the Council table indicating the planned recreational facilities On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, E.I.R. No. 33, as submitted by the Developer, was received and adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP. TRACT NO. 7416: Developer, W. L. Builders, Corp., tract located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, east of Concerto Drive; containing 7 proposed R -2 zoned lots. The City Engineer reported said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and required fees paid, however, recommended that final approval of said tract map be deferred for two weeks or until the Developer has finalized an agreement with the Placentia Unified School District concerning drainage of this tract through school district property. He ad- vised that without this agreement, approximately 2/3 of the subject property would be without drainage. Mr. William Lyon, W. L. Builders Corp., stated that the development is already six months behind schedule, and they were anxious to obtain a grading permit and complete grading prior to the rainy season, and urged Council to take action so that the project might proceed. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7416 be approved subject to approval of the required bond and the tract covenants, conditions and restrictions by the City Attorney and finalization and approval of an agreement between the Placentia Unified School District and the developer regarding drainage of said tract. Council- man Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 24 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1329): E.I.R. No. 24 pertaining to the re- establishment of a car wash and gasoline dispensing facility on property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and State College Boulevard, was submitted, together with analysis prepared by the E.I.R. Review Committee. Mr. Roberts briefed the Council on the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee stating that the Committee found the report to include all pertinent points. The only significant impact in their opinion would be caused by the noise from the dryer-blower and the Applicant has stipulated to the use of sound attentuation devices and limited hours of operation to minimize the po- tential disturbance. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, E.I.R. No. 24 and Committee analysis thereof, were received and adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in regard to Conditional Use Permit No. 1329 in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 32 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. i1 -72 52 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1320): E.I.R. No. 32 and E.I.R. Review Committee analysis was sub- mitted pertaining to Reclassification No. 71 -72-52 and Conditional Use Permit 72 -730 City Hall. ,aahlim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 19)2. 1:30 P.M. No. 1320 for the construction of an 81 -unit motel on property located on the southwest side of Manchester Avenue, east of Mountain View Avenue. Mr. Roberts advised the Council that the E.I.R. Review Committee found that the report conformed to the City's interim guidelines and ad- dressed all required areas adequately. The Committee's consensus of opinion was that the proposed project would have no significant environmental impact. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, E.I.R. No. 32 and Committee analysis thereof was received and adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in regard to Re- classification No. 71 -72 -52 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1320 in compli- ance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVZONMENTA INTACT REPORT NO. 48 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -U -4 AND VARIANCE NO. 2386): E.I.R. No. 38 and E.I.R. Review Committee analysis was submitted pertaining to Reclassification No. 72 -73-4 and Variance No. 2386, on property located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Fern Street, proposed for a 114 -unit apartment complex. Mr. Roberts briefed the Council on the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee reporting that said report adequately covers all of the required areas and were of the opinion the project would have no significant environmental impact. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, E.I.R. No. 38 and Committee analysis thereof were received and adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in regard to Reclassi- fication No. 72 -73 -4 and Variance No. 2386 in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT NO. 41 (RECLASSIFICATION NOS. 68-69-32. 72-73-15 AND TRACT NO. 4693): E.I.R. No. 41 and E.I.R. Review Committee analysis was submitted pertaining to Reclassification Nos. 68-69-32, 72 -73 -15 and Tract No. 4693 referring to property located east of Kellogg Drive, south of the Yorba Linda Freeway, proposed for a 59-lot single-family tract. Mr. Roberts briefed the Council on the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee stating that the major areas were covered in this report and due to similarity of land use in the immediate area and the relatively minor scale of the project the proposal would cause no significant environ- mental impact. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, E.I.R. No. 41 and Committee analysis thereof were received and adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the City Council in regard to Reclass- ification Nos. 68- 69-32, 72 -73 -15 and Tract No. 4693 in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. AEOUEST REGARDING PERMIT FOR HOUSEMOVING: Mr. Ron Thompson advised the Council that on October 30, 1972, the Building Division of Development Services Department issued a housemoving permit to Mr. J. D. Malone to allow the moving of an existing 3 bedroom, 3 bath structure onto 4500 East Cerro Vista Drive, Peralta Hills, and Mr. Malone thereupon began removing ,the structure, which was in five sections, to said location. It was discovered several days later that this permit had been issued in error, prior to the time that a public hearing was to take place. Mr. Malone was immediately notified that the permit was in the process of being revoked, however, two 1ortions of the home (estimated to be approximately 2,734 square feet) were already on the property and the other three portions are in transit. Mr. Thompson requested that the City Council grant permission to Mr. Malone to store the portions of subject structure which are presently in transit on the property until such time as the public hearin4 be held. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, portions of the structure presently in transit were authorized to be placed on the property at 4500 East Cerro Vista Drive, in temporary storage until such time as the public hearing can be held. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -731 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972 1 :30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -516 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 657 B: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -516 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE KATELLA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM HASTER STREET TO WALNUT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 657 -B. (Donn 0. Michaels $59,144.53) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -516 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -517 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 663 A: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -517 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE BELHAVEN STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM BALL ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 203 FEET SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 663 -A. (J. B. Crosby Company, Inc. $3,570.69) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -517 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -518 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 1243: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -518 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE WEST STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 650 FT. SOUTH OF BALL ROAD TO WINSTON ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1243. (J. L. Scott Company $8,894.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -518 duly passed and adopted. 72 -732 City Nall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: Environmental Impact Report prepared by the Engineering Division staff regarding the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, a project of the City of Anaheim, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Councilman Dutton moved that it be the finding of the Council that there will be no substantial adverse environmental impact and there will be no adverse irreversible changes involved in the proposed project and that the Environmental Impact Report as submitted, for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, be adopted as the Environmental Impact Statement of the Council and ordered filed with the City Planning Department. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -519 WORK ORDER NO. 1510: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -519 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE SNACK SHOP AND RESTROOM FACILITY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1510. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened December 21, 1972, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -519 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -520 WORK ORDER NO. 5284: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -520 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTING IN TRACT NO. 1959, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, STREET LIGHTING DIS- TRICT 72 -1, WORK ORDER NO. 5284. (Baxter- Griffin Company) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -520 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -521 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -521 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Calprop Corp.; Bedeccn Investments) Roll Call Vote: City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -521 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -522 GRANT DEED, WEST SUBSTATION SITE: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -522 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CERTAIN DEED AND ORDERING ITS RECORDATION. (Chas. Hillman West Substation Site) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -522 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -523 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONDEMNATION NO. 7: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -523 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CERTAIN AGREEMENTS WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (Condemnation No. 7). (West of Dale, north of Orange) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -523 duly passed and adopted. MOTION CARRIED. 72-733 CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Claim submitted by Audrie Altman Royer, for purported personal property damage to camper caused by tree limb which had been trimmed by the City, on or about October 28 1972. b. Claim submitted by Allstate Insurance Company on behalf of Mrs. Stella Axis, for purported personal property damage sustained as a result of improper street markings and signs at the intersection of Santa Ana and Olive Streets, on or about October 12, 1972. c. Claim submitted by Dora Gene Golder, for purported personal property damages sustained as a result of imperfection of pavement at the corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, on or about October 13, 1972. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom: a. City of Graden Grove Resolution No. 4320 -72 Supporting the modification of current tax assessment practices that discourage improvement and maintenance of residential properties, and urging the State Legislature to take action to correct this situation. b. City of Norwalk Resolution No. 2546 Requesting that the State of California,by lawiprovide for the allocation of revenue sharing funds among units of local government on an optional formula basis as authorized under the State and Local Fiscal Assistance act of 1972. 72-734 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. c. Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of August, September and October, 1972. Utilities Dept., Water Division (August Utilities Dept., Electrical Division (September) Building Division (October d. Cultural Arts Commission Minutes September 18 and October 9, 1972. e. Public Employment Program Report. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3092: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3092 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.272(g) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking During School Hours Glenview Avenue, area of Glenview Elementary School) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3092 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3093: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3093 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68 -69 -98 (2) R -1 Tract 7003, Revision 2) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3093 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3094: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3094 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68 -69 -13 (2) R -3 Tract No. 7802) ALCOHOLIC Aviv= LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted Helen M. Chu and Sunny Y. Chu for on -sale beer and wine license for the Canton Chinese Restaurant, 2641 West Lincoln Avenue, was presented by the City Manager to the City Council. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis that the premises are presently located in a C-1 zone which does*ot permit the on-sale sale of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED. PcLI(,'j NOVIRCYcLE COURSE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ACAM1 The Assistant City Manager reported on the proposal to send Anaheim Police Officers to the Calif- ornia Highway Patrol Academy for motorcycle training classes, which was orig- inally submitted for Council consideration at the October 11, 1972 meeting and held over by general Council consent pending further information as to the costs involved and the necessity of this course. The original report prepared by Sergeant D. E. Clark had been copied and submitted for Council's information and consideration. 72-735 Citi Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL }NOTES November 7. 1272. 1:30 P.M. Police Chief Michel advised the Council that the costs to the City for this training, i.e., tuition, living costs while at the Academy, and transportation would be 100% reimbursable under the P.O.S.T. Program and the only cost to the City would be the loss of an Officer's time while attending the course. Chief Michel further advised that the newest, or most inexperienced, officers would be sent first, and those who have ridden motorcycles for a long period of time would not be sent at all if it is thought they might be rotated from this division. However, if these experienced officers are expected to remain in the motorcycle division for a period of time, justifying the train- ing, he would also send them. This training for all motorcycle officers should reduce the accident rate. He reported during the last two years, out of 19 accidents, 15 were considered preventable. RESOLUTION NO. 721-524: On recommendation of the Chief of Police, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -524 for adoption, authorizing an agreement between the City of Anaheim and the State of California for motorcycle training. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH- ORIXING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY PATROL RELATING TO MOTORCYCLE TRAINING CLASSES FOR ANAHEIM POLICE OFFICERS AT THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ACADEMY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -524 fuly passed and adopted. SAFETY LIGHTING SCHOOL CROSSWALKS: Mr. Davis referred to report from the Traffic Engineer regarding the safety lighting adjacent to school crosswalks, and suggested that the street lighting crew, employed with P.E.P. funds, be util- ized to install street lighting on these recommended sites, insofar as the budget for street safety lighting will allow. The school crosswalks to be placed in the same priority as safety lighting presently installed at intersections. Councilman Sneegas felt lighting should be provided where the most usage occurs; especially at those crosswalks adjacent to high schools being used at night for adult education or activity centers. He also stated that placement of street lights should be reevaluated in cases where crosswalks are adjacent to elementary schools, as in some instances, repainting of the crosswalks would suffice rather than lighting the crosswalk. It was the unanimous opinion of the City Council that the P.E.P. funds allocated to safety lighting be utilized to light crosswalks adjacent to schools on the priority of usage and insofar as these funds will allow. INFORMATION EXCHANGE PROGRAM COUNTY OF ORANGE. CITY OF ANAHEIM: Mr. Davis reported on the joint program between the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange, funded under P.E.P., to develop a pilot project for exchange of information. He advised that the project has produced a catalog of informa- tion sources, which has proven to be a valuable docuipnt for many departments for location of various types of information. The City last year authorized the transfer of $55,000.00 of P.E.P. funds to the County of Orange for finan- cing of this program and the County has contributed supervisory and other personnel. Mr. Davis reported that the City Manager'sOffice feels that this is a worthwhile project, and will prove to be of value in the future when all of the planned elements, such as geo- coding are complete. 72- 736 City Hall. Ana eim. California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7. 1972. 1:00 P.M. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council authorized the continued support of the information exchange pro- gram, to be financed under P.E.P. funds, on a month to month basis, as recom- mended by Mr. Davis. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS: Mr. Davis reported that the League of California Cities has requested direction from the City Council on the forma- tion of a basic policy guideline, to be drawn up at their November 9, 1972 Executive Board meeting, regarding the spending of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds allocated to the County of Orange. Communication has been received from the League urging all member cities to participate in this meeting so that the Board of Supervisors at their public hearing on November 22, 1972, will have recommendations from all affected cities. The suggestion is that 50% of the County's revenue share be apportioned to the cities and 50% to the unincor- porated areas. It was the general consensus that Mayor Dutton, representing the City of Anaheim, urge that the 50% allocated to the County be spent on projects of general benefit to residents of both incorporated and unincorporated areas. MUNICIAL ANIVISORY.CQUNCILS: Mr. Davis reported that the Orange County Board of Supervisors is considering appointing Municipal Advisory Councils under section 31.010 of the government code for the unincorporated areas. He advised that a number of cities within Orange County have expressed concern as this arrange- ment might cause disproportionate representation on the Board of Supervisors. The City Council was of the opinion that since the Board of Super- visors withheld decision for two weeks to further consider this issue, no action by the City was required at this time. Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -525 for adoption. RESOLUTION N0. 72R-525 EMPLOYMENT OF PROGRAM COORDINATOR PARKS AND RECREATION Councilman Thom stated that he personally felt it was not equit- able for the unincorporated areas to receive 50% of the benefits under revenue sharing when the bulk of the population on which taxes are assessed resides within the cities. Councilman Dutton stated that his concern would be that the Board of Supervisors use their 50% for the unincorporated area to the benefit of the entire County. Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -525 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF HAL HAMILTON, AN INDIVIDUAL. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -525 duly passed and adopted. SETTLEMENT APENMENT ROYAL INNS: Mr. Alan Watts reported on the proposed settle- ment agreement between the City of Anaheim and Royal Inns, which will authorize reimbursement to Royal Inns in the amount of $18,000.00 which represents the difference between the fees originally set forth in the lease agreement ($1,000.00 per month for contemplated period of 12 months) an0 the fees actually collected by the City ($1,000.00 per month for a period of 30 months). He stated Royal Inns continued to make the lease payments during the period of litigation on the recommendation of the City Attorney, so as not to permit a third party contending they were in default. Mr. Watts reported additionally, 72 -737 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. that in connection with this agreement, Royal Inns agreed to pay gross rentals commencing August 15, 1971, whereas the hotel was not scheduled to open until October 1971. Councilman Thom stated that he objected to refunding $18,000.00 of the taxpayers' money to Royal Inns if they are not bringing legal action against the City to do so. Mr. Geisler advised that Royal Inns has made a demand for return of this sum of money on the grounds that they did not owe it under the terms of the contract; they paid it under protest at that time to preserve the relation- ship between the City and themselves. He pointed out that Royal Inns concession payments on gross rental in August rather than October almost amounts to the sum we are discussing, and they could have contended that under the terms of the contract, gross rentals were not due until October. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -526: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -526 for adoption, as recommended by the City Attorney. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROYAL INNS OF AMERICA, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -526 duly passed and adopted. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 49TH ANNUAL CONGRESS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council designated Mayor Dutton "delegate" and Councilman Sneegas "alternate" at the 49TH Annual Congress, National League of Cities, November 26 through 30, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. REWEST FOR REHEARING ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINT, SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD (RECLASSIFI- CATION NO. 71 -72 -21 AND VARIANCE NO. 2310): Councilman Thom submitted request for rehearing received from Rinker Development Corporation to reconsider an addi- tional access point to Santa Ana Canyon Road, and to present new evidence. By general Council consent, the City Clerk was authorized to schedule said rehearing subject to the payment of the required $50.00 fee by the Appli- cant. SANTA ANA CANYON STUDY COMMITTEE: Councilman Thom presented a resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County dated September 19, 1972 regarding the progress report of the Santa Ana Canyon Study Committee and moved that the City Council adopt a similar resolution. There being no second to the motion, Mayor Dutton declared said matter held over for future consideration. APPOINTMENT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Councilman Dutton reported the resignation of Mr. John M. DeHoney from the Community Redevelopment Commission and recommended the appointment of Mr. I. Gene McDaniel for the unexpired term ending June 30, 1973. Resignation of Mr. DeHoney was accepted with regrets and appointment of Mr. McDaniel to the Community Redevelopment Commission to fill the unexpired term was unanimously approved on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn, Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4 :15 P.M.