Loading...
1964/01/07 7386 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M.: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: NoneG CITY MANAGER: Keith AG Murdoch~ CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams3 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held December 17, 1963, were approved. Councilman Krein abstained from voting on said minutes, due to his absence from the December 17, 1963 meeting. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 511: Submitted by Arnold Construction Company, requesting permission to establish a motel, with later addition of restau- rant-bar facilities on M-l and C-2 property, located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, approximately 242 feet north of Romneya Drive (1224 North Harbor Boulevard). Subject application was presented to the City Council at their meeting held December 31, 1963, for their information and consideration, together with City Planning Commission Resolution No. 986, Series 1963-64, granting said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. In accordance with report and recommendations of the City Engineer that additional easement dedications were necessary, the City Council authorized Conditional Use Permit No.51I to be set for public hearing befo~e the Council, should said additional dedications not be obtained by this date, January 7, 1964. Mr. Maddox reported that after conferring with the developer of the proposed project, and Electrical Division of the City, no additional ease- ment dedication is requiredo On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, previous Council action authorizing date for public hearing to be set, was rescinded. MOTION CARRIED. No further action was taken by the City Council on Conditional Use Permit No. 511. PUBLIC HEARING, VACATION AND ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a portion of an easement for road purposes, being a portion of the Stearns Rancho reservation through Tract No. 4618, along the extension of Nutwood Street, south of Catalpa Avenue, pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-982, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin December 26, 1963, and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed abandonment, there being no response, declared the. hearing closede RESOLUTION NO. 64R-l: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-l for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES, TO WIT, A PORTION OF A STEARNS RANCHO RESERVATION UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (Extension of Nutwood Avenue south of. Catalpa Avenue) 7387 City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M. On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 64R-l was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. Noneo None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-l duly passed and adopted. SIGN REQUEST - AUTONETICS: Application submitted by Autonetics, 3370 East La Palma Avenue, requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign at the rear of their property, north of the Riverside Freeway, together with plans and report from the Building Department, was reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Agnew, of Santa Ana Neon Company, was present and submitted an additional drawing showing proposed modification of their requested sign. On Motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said signs permit was granted, as shown on modified drawing of the Santa Ana Neon Co. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: Application submitted by Goodwill Industries, 3242 - 3248 West Lincoln Avenue, requesting permission to erect a non- conforming sign at said location, together with plans and report from the Building Department, was reviewed by the City Councilo On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, said sign permit was granted as requestedo To this motion Councilman Dutton voted "No"o MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSAL - ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY: Consideration of proposal of Anaheim Union Water Company to convey to the City of Anaheim water distribution facilities within the Anaheim city limits, was continued from the last meeting for report from the Director of Public Works. Mr. Piersall reported that there are two factors in which the City of Anaheim would have an advantageG One9 those portions of the Anaheim Union Water System which could be used in an integrated ultimate system of storm drainage; to be used in some cases as an interim system, and in others as a supplementary to a storm drain systemo Mr. Piersall further reported that an analysis was made of the twenty-six miles of line, and evaluation of the system was on a cubic foot per water moved, per foot of pipe; that according to their estimate, the value for storm drainage purposes would be from $5,000000 to $9,000.00. Second, there would be an advantage in relocating the existing lines for street improvements, which is extremely difficult to assign a dollar value9 as in some cases the developer is responsible for the reloca- tion of these lines, and the many local lines running from the Anaheim Union Water System that the consumers have installed are uncharted lines; however their estimate would be between $10,000.00 and $15,000.00. Mr. Piersall further reported tha~ on the liability side of the factor, is approximately 8,000 feet of open channel, weir boxes, etc., that in their opinion are hazardous and should be removed. The cost of removing these open channels, etco, would approximately balance out the cost of esti- mated value for relocating lines. Mr. Geisler reported that the contract was discussed with Mr. Murdoch, Mr. Peterson, and Mr. Dudley Wright, Attorney for Anaheim Union Water Company. Concerning the clause pertaining to indemnity, Mr. Wright was of the opinion that it was essential that a protective clause be a part of the agreement; however, the company would be agreeable to a fifty-fifty basis. Regarding water rights, the City felt some commitment should be made, that if they did sell the water rights, there should be a right of first refusal, either to the City of Anaheim, or some governmental agency of Orange County. ~ I r (-" I ' I 7388 City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7.. 1964.. 1:30 P.M.' The company advised that although they probably would sell the water rights to some Orange County agency, they would not be willing to commit themselves, as in their opinion it might prejudice their bargaining position on the sale of the rightst Mr. Geisler further advised that the proposed agreement would not transfer shares; the only obligation to the shareholders or present cus- tomers would be to furnish irrigation water, which would be on the basis of the City charges, and in accordance vlth City rates. Reference was made to the two factors to the City9s advantage, reported by Mro Lenain, Superintendent of the Water Division, the pr~gently existing thirty-six inch bore under the Riverside Freeway, and a bore to be constructed under the proposed Orange Freeway, which could be used for City water transmission mains, being an estimated value to the City of Anaheim of approximately $16,000.00. In answer to Council questioning, Mra Peterson advised that the Orange County Water District has filed an adjudication proceeding against all the up-river users. Mr. Murdoch reported that the possible use of the water rights, if they could be acquired, was investigated, and explained where th~ water could be obtained and how it could be channeled into the City system. Concern was expressed regarding the possible loss of these water rights to this area by non-use. Mr. Peterson advised that approximately 2,000 acres are still being served, namely in the Placentia area, and that they will continue to take water in order to retain the rights. Recognizing the relationship between the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Union Water Company has always been on the highest level, Councilman Chandler advised that he would prefer purchasing the facilities on the basis of the number of acres to be served, with transfer of water rights to serve said acreage. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the present contract offer be referred to the City Manager and City Attorney for further negotiations with Mr. Peterson and Mr. Wright, of the Anaheim Union Water Company, to determine if a more equitable arrangement can be worked out, even if it would result in the purchasing of said facilities and water rights. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - SIDEWALK PLACEMENT. 2746 WEST BROADWAY: Request of Mr. K. La Spaulding for permission to install sidewalk adjacent to the curb in front of his residence at 2746 West Broadway, was submitted. Also submitted and reviewed by the City Council was report from the City Engineer, recommending said request be denied, for the following reasons: 1. This construction would be in contrast to Standard Plan No. 1000, as approved and adopted by the City Council. 2. Dr. Albert Schweitzer School (229 South Dale) is 670 feet west of subject property. 3. City Library and Community Park are located immediately to the east of subject property, generating heavy foot traffic. 4. Property west of subject property has sidewalk at the ultimate 13 foot alignment along Broadway, and the transition of the walk from there to the proposed alignment adjacent to the curb could cause a safety hazard. Mr. Maddox reported that he felt the City Counci19s attention should be called to additional factors, which are the pedestrian safety afforded by placing sidewalks away from the streets, the more pleasing appearance of streets lined with landscaped parkways, and. the fact that utility poles, fire hydrants, etc., are installed in parkway areas~ and would have to be within the sidewalk area, should subject request be granted. ~~,_~Cji;;"~,C,;-,~"~""",,, 7389 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Spaulding addressed the Council advising that the thirteen foot parkway width along Broadway would place the sidewalk within twelve feet of his living room, constituting an invasion of privacy, in his opinion. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said request was denied, in accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. REVISED TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 5231 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-5 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 449): Communication dated December 13, 1963, from Consolidated Engineering, on behalf of S. V. Hunsaker and Sons, was sub- mitted requesting elimination of the six foot wall along the Riverside Freeway frontage, being the westerly boundary of Revised Tentative Tract No. 5231, required as condition of approval thereof~ ! Council discussion was held and attention was called to Council Policy No. 520, pertaining to all residential subdivisions adjacent to freeways and/or arterial highways, which policy requires a six foot masonry wall, separating the abutting lot from said freeway or arterial highway. Mr. Purdy, representing S. V. Hunsaker and Sons, advised that they have been informed by the State of California that chain link fences must be installed by the State along all freeways, regardlessof what type fencing or walls may be installed on property lines~ He further advised that because of the difference between the elevation of the freeway and their property, a wall would not screen the alley and garages which are to be located on the west side of the property, and he thereupon requested said requirement be eliminated. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said request was denied in accordance with Council Policy. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-124 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 432- EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Doyle and Shields, dated December 26, 1963, was submitted~ for 180 day extension of time, to Reclassification No. 62-63-124 and Conditional Use Permit No. 432, for compliance with certain conditions contingent to the granting of subject applications. ~ One hundred and eighty day extension of time was granted as requested, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. CLARIFICATION - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5403 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-35 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 313): Brought before the City Council as City Planning Commission recommendations concerning termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 313 and amendment to Reclassification No. 62-63-35 had not been acted upono It was determined by the City Council that recommendations of the City Planning Commission were not acted upon, leaving determination to the developer to finalize said tract map or develop under pending Reclassifi~ cation and Conditional Use Permit at his option. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-2: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-2 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENT, JOB NO. 819; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened January 30, 1964,2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ':M. K' ---" "r~ "'--'1>:'" - -."--,,....._."'''''''.,,''''......'.....,.,;;,H''''''"'lI'''' 7390 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 7~ 1964. 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-2 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-3: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-3 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF LEWIS STREET AND CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 834; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE~ MENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened January 30, 1964, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-3 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-4: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-4 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: DRILLING AN 18-INCH WATER WELL TO AN APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF 325 FEET, AT 518 SOUTH LOS ANGELES STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, TO BE DESIGNATED "WELL NO. 34" WORK ORDER NO. 1803; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS ,. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 6, 1964, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-4 duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, cancellation of City Taxes was authorized on property acquired by the California Division of Highways for public purposes, property formerly assessed to J. R. Scholz, et ux, Deed recorded November 27, 1963, in Book 6820, Page 112, official records of Orange County California. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES AND REFUND: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, cancellation of City Taxes, and refund of that portion of prepaid taxes which would have been cancelled if unpaid, was authorized, on properties acquired by the California Division of Highways for public purposes, properties formerly assessed as follows: Lillev, Ince, Deed recorded November 27, 1963, in Book 6820, Page 119, official records of Orange County California. Helen J. Trapp, et al, Deed recorded November 26, 1963, Book 6817, Page 876, official records of Orange County California. ~~;q.,.""':-~-",",,,"--,,-- 7391 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 7. 1963, 1:30 P.M. General Pipe and Supply Co., Inc., Deed recorded, December 3, 1963, Book 6826, Page 524, official records of Orange County California. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-5: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-5 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Milton Okin, et ux) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-5 duly passed and adopted. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim in the amount of $21,550.00 was filed by Iota Corporation, for damages received as result of extra work performed by said corporation as Con- tractor, in connection with Job No. 758, purportedly due to plans and specifications for said job as distributed by the City of Anaheim. Mayor Coons requested an explanation of the statement made concerning "LO-HED" pipe as set forth in the plans and specifications. Mr. Maddox explained that "LO-HED"pipe is elliptical pipe, and not being a cylinder type pipe, installation difficulties can occur in JOInIng the lengths. Further, inspection of the pipe to determine the concentricity of the ends of the pipe can not be made until the pipe is joined. On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Chandler said claim was denied and referred to the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. Glenn Mo Webb. reo retention of tree (landmark) b. Mildred Campbello re.traffic signal - Ball Road and Gilbuck Drive. c. Feather River Project Association Agenda, meeting of January 3, 1964. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1963: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1963 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-55 - R-A) After hearing read in full the tile of Ordinance No. 1963 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by George Puente, for person to person transfer of off-sale beer license, for the Ball-Dale Hofbrau, at 2820 west Ball Road (C-l Zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 360), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. No action was taken said petition. ~"""j~"'''~~'''.'f",,<jj'i,'ii''*!_$_~t'.- 7392 City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7. 1963. 1:30 P.M. ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER TO VOTE MONTH: Resolution of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, proclaiming the month of January 1964 "Register to vote month", was submitted together with communication from the chairman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, urging that the City Council officially declare said month "Register to vote month" in the City of Anaheim, and select an active citizen of the community to act as Anaheim Chairman to help coordinate the county wide effort@ RESOLUTION NO. 64R-6: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-6 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1964 "REGISTER TO VOTE MONTH". by the On roll following AYES; NOE S : ABSENT: call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted vote: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-6 duly passed and adopted. Appointment of Chairman was deferred at this time. SIDEWALKS - DISNEYLAND AREA: In order to reduce a possible hazardous situation created by pedestrian traffic in the streets of the Disneyland Area, Mayor Coons requested the City Engineer to review and report on all temporary sidewalk waivers granted in the Disneyland area, to determine if installa- tions of sidewalks should now be required. REGISTRATION OF SERVICE PERSONNEL: Discussion was held regarding possible police investigation and registration of personnel rendering services to visitors and tourists coming to Anaheim, and the possibility of providing some means of identification of these peopleo (Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 2:50 P.M.) Mr~ Geisler reported that a similar request has been received from the Police Department, and their office is presently investigating this matter and will be submitting a report in the near future. STANDARDS FOR CLEANLINESS- RESTAURANTS: Discussion was held regarding issuance of certificates that can be posted and visible for the benefit of visitors and tourists, certifying that an establishment has been inspected by the health authorities and found to be in a clean and sanitary condition. Councilman Krein was requested to contact Dr. Russell, County Health Officer, to determine if such a certificate can be issued as result of inspections made by that Departmento STANDARDS - MOTELS: Mayor Coons referred to an establishment recently checked wherein the conditior.3 found were~ in his opinion, a disgrace to the community, and suggested that some type standards be ~tablished to keep the operation and maintenance of motels at a level resulting in a favor- able image of Anaheim to visitors and tourists coming to the City. Discussion was held; at the conclusion thereof, Mayor Coons suggested a committee be appointed comprising representation of the City Council and the Visitors and Convention Bureau to establish standards by which motels can be rated, and further requested Councilmen Chandler and Dutton contact the Visitors and Convention Bureau to implement the program. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M., Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to orders ~~~.,..,,,~:;.::;.........~,..,:,~~. 7393 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7. 1963. 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdocho CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler3 CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams~ CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. - INVOCATION: Reverend George Mann, West Anaheim Methodist Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 506: Submitted by Clarence W. and Elizabeth Mauerhan, requesting permission to establish a restaurant (Portion "An), and a 100 unit motel (Portion "B"); R-A and R-3 property described as being located on the south side of Katella Avenue, west side of Casa Vista Street and north side of Casa Grande Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 973, Series 1963-64, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following condi- conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Katella Avenue and Casa Grande Avenue, for street lighting purposes~ 2. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Stella Avenue subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to final building inspection. 3. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a three foot overhang easement along the northerly 200 feet adjacent to the C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone structures abutting to the north of subject property~ 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspectione 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to final building inspectiono 6. That Condition Noso 1 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the Commission may granto 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibits I-IOu, as amended herein" 8. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west pro- perty line, thence easterly to the southwesterly corner of the motel, to separate and prohibit access to the single family and multiple family residential property adjacent to the parking area of the pro- posed motel, prior to final building inspectione 9. That if central air-conditioning facilities are installed in the proposed buildings, these facilities shall be contained within the building or properly shielded from view, that window units may be installed along the first floor only of the Casa Grande Avenue ele- vation, and that the second story units shall be relocated to the northerly side of said structure~ 10. That a 20-foot strip of land shall be landscaped and maintained on the Katella Avenue frontage in accordance with Commission and City Council policy for the Disneyland Area, that a 15-foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Casa Grande Avenue frontage as indicated on Exhibit No.1, on file with the City, to adequately shield from view the air- conditioning units proposed for the first floor of the Casa Grande Avenue elevation of the proposed building, that the Casa Vista Street frontage shall be landscaped in accordance with Exhibit No.5, on file with the City; that plans for said landscaping shall be subject to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspection. 7394 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7.1964. 1:30 P.M. 11. That tree wells shall be provided at approximate 40-foot intervals in the Katella Avenue, Casa Grande Avenue, and Casa Vista Street parkways abutting subject property; that plans for said tree wells and planting of trees therein, shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said tree wells shall be planted with trees prior to final building inspection. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Ulysses E. Bauer, Architect for the proposed project, and Public Hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the irregularly shaped subject property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, indi- cating existing landscape setback areas along Katella Avenue varying in width from 10 to 20 feet. Mr. Kreidt called attention to a Revised Plan of development for portion "A", submitted for Council review together with report from the Planning Department - Development Review. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to address the City Council. Mr. Ulysses E. Bauer, Architect, 500-C North Los Angeles Street, Anaheim, addressed the City Council advising that the appeal was filed to request the 20 foot landscaped setback along Katella Avenue be reduced to 10 feet@ In their opinion a 10 foot landscaped setback would provide not only a nice appearance, and just as much baffle as an additional 10 feet of lawn, but also provide additional space to maneuver cars in the parking area. Regarding the air<-conditioners, Mro Bauer advised that relocating the air-conditioners to the inner-court side of the building, as agreed to at the City Planning Commission hearing, was found to require substantial changes, and thereupon requested approval of a different type air-conditioner; an "in-wall" unit extending approximately 2 inches from the finished surface. of the exterior wall and with protective grills, an over all extension of approximately 4 incheso Plans and the file were reviewed together with drawing submitted by the Architect. The City Clerk read communication dated January 3, 1964, from John B. Halverson, Attorney representing Mr. F. L. Duda, owner of apartment building at 1830 Casa Vista Street. Said letter noted Mr. Duda's objection to the proposed development, advising his building faces subject property, and the plans indicate egress from the motel at a point directly opposite the front of his building, adding to the already heavily traveled Casa Vista Street. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. MrG Halverson, Union Bank Tower, Orange, Attorney representing Mr. Duda, addressed the Council in opposition, calling attention to the existing R-3 zoning and noted that 1830 Casa Vista Street faces the proposed commercial property which normally requires a 20 foot setback instead of 3 feet; and further advised that in his opinion an undesirable precedent would be establish- ed by granting a motel use on existing R-3 Zoned property. Mr. Halverson submitted photos illustrating the relationship of sub- ject property to the apartment building. Mrso Flostine Herbst, owner of property located at 1172 and 1178 Casa Grande Avenue, submitted photos of subject property and a typical residence in the area, and advised that the proposed development would be a welcome improve- ment to the vacant property and the neighborhood. Further, no increase in traf- fic has been noted through their neighborhood as a result of the existing motels on Katella Avenue. 7395 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 7. 1964. 1:30 P.M. Mr. and Mrs. Kardun, 1184 Casa Grande Avenue, addressed the Council in favor of the proposed development, concurring with the statement made by Mrs. Herbst. Mr. Ben Dobbs, 1837 South Jacalene, adjacent to subject property, was of the opinion that the value of nearby property would be increased by the development as planned; and could not foresee future problems that would be ___ caused by traffic generated by the motel and restaurant.p~otection. Mr. Bauer, in rebuttal, stated that the apartment building on Casa Vista Street, referred to by Mr. Halverson, actually faces Casa Grande Avenue, and the driveway for traffic leaving the motel would be directly across from the apartment garagess Mr. Halverson advised that it was Mr. Duda's understanding that a 3 foot planting strip and wall were planned for the west side of Casa Vista Street, to which he objected~ He further noted that the address of the apart- ment building is 1830 Casa Vista Street. Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. In answer to Councilman Chandler's question, Mr. Mahuerhan referred to City Planning Commission Condition No.1, advising that the street light installation charges for Casa Grande Avenue were previously paid when the tract was developed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-7: Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-7 for adoption, grant- ing Conditional Use Permit No. 506, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amendments: Condition No. 1 to read "That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Katella Avenue and Casa Grande Avenue, for street lighting purposes, where not previously paid." Condition No.9 to read "That if central air-conditioning facilities are installed in the proposed buildings, these facilities shall be contained within the building or properly shielded from view, that window units may be installed provided they do not project more than four inches from the building wall." Condition No. 10 to read "That a ten foot strip of landscaping shall be installed and maintained on the Katella Avenue frontage in the area so designated on Exhibit No.1 and initialed by Mayor Coons; that a 15-foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Casa Grande Avenue frontage as indicated on Exhibit No.1, on file with the City, to adequately shield from view the air-conditioning units pro- posed for the first floor of the Casa Grande Avenue elevation of the proposed building, that the Casa Vista Street frontage shall be land- scaped maccordance with Exhibit No.5, on file with the City; that plans for said landscaping shall be subject to and approved by the Superin- tendent of Parkway Maintenance, and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspection." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 506. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: , 7396 City Hal14 Anaheim4 California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 74 19644 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-7 duly passed and adopted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, Exhibit No.1, Revision 1, showing additional landscaping on Portion "A" of property described in Conditional Use Permit No. 506, was approved. MOTION CARRIED. Plans dated this date and signed by Mayor Coons. PUBLIC HEARING. -RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-57 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 502: Submitted by R. P. Gillman, Gs T$ Erickson, R. Karos and D. W. Hook, re- questing change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission for the following: 1. Change the use of the existing complex of buildings from a motel to a multiple family planned residential development. 2. Waive one-story height limitation within 150 feet of single family zone property. 3. Waive required frontage on a dedicated street or alley. 4. Waive garage requirements. Property briefly described as located on the east side of Euclid Avenue approximately 286 feet east of Euclid Avenue, between La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive (1144 North Euclid Avenue, immediately east of Water Wheel Restaurant property)s City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 970, Series 1963-64,recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions. 1. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of a Conditional Use PermitG 2. That an irrevocable easement granting access from subject property across the abutting property to the west, fronting on Euclid Street, shall be submitted to and approved by the City AttorneyVs office prior to reclas- sification of subject property. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 971, Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 502 subject to the following conditionslt 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to the reclassification of subject property. 2. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets with minimum capacity of 100 cubic feet shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior walls of the carports, prior to reclassification subject property. 3. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 63-64-57. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property ~ existing uses in the area, he summarized the public hearing held before the City Planning Com- mission, and advised that the size of the units meet the R-3 Code requirements and that the only variance from the R-3 Code requirements, are the provisions for trash storage areas, and the carport which is presently under construction. The Mayor asked if the applicants wished to address the Council. Mr. Warren Finley Attorney, 1010 North Main Street Suite 700, Santa Ana, California, representing the applicants, advised that the applica- tion was submitted in order to conform with the existing actual usage of the property. He further advised that the building was constructed with the ~'~"'~"'-'~~''';'''''''-,^,.,,;,,,,,,,,"".';'',( 7397 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7_ 1964_ 1:30 P.M. thought in mind that of leasing the units to businesses and corporations on long term leases, to be occupied on a temporary basis by their various visiting personnel, and as of this date sixty-two of the sixty-four units are presently leased on a yearly basis~ Letter received this date, signed by the applicants was submitted and it was noted that the tenants were residents of Anaheim, and were reg- istered voters of the City of Anaheim. - The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Arthur Harman, 1760 West Lincoln Avenue, advised that his objections were expressed in a letter filed by the Anaheim Area Visitors and Convention Bureau, that if the development becomes an apartment under the Apartment Code, there would be no objections, however he could foresee a general danger of establishing a precedent8 The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr. Kreidt called attention to a typographical error in both of the resolutions of the City Planning Commission relative to the Reclassification and Conditional Use Permit, and advised that in Finding No~ 1 reference should be to a two-story construction rather than one-story construction. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-8: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Chandler noted the following findings; 1. That subject development is an R-3 development because of standards required by the City Council in granting the motel permit. 2. That the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 502 is in no way any indication a precedent will be established, wherein other motels in commercial or recreational areas will be granted a similar zoning; that the granting of this permit is because of the unique circumstances noted. 3. That the application for R-3 Reclassification, is in an area that the Planning Staff and City Planning Commission have previously recommended for R-3 development by virtue of the plan studies on file, and the general indication on the General Plan. In accordance with the above findings, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-8 authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-57 _ R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-8 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-9: In accordance with the above findings made, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-9 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 502, in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. 7398. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 7~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 502. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-9 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-59: Submitted by Vivian F. Simmons, requesting a change of zone from R-l to C-l, property located at the southeast corner of Hiawatha Avenue and Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 976, Series 1963-64 recommended Reclassification No. 63-64-59 be denied. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of subject property and the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and advised that the owner of subject property plan to use a portion of said property for a beauty shop, and also was the owner of the adjacent residential lot to the east. Mr. Kreidt further reported that it was learned that the existing dedication on Brookhurst Street was 50 feet instead of 40 feet as reported, so the width of the lot would be reduced by ten feet instead of twenty feet for street right-of-way, resulting in a lot width of sixty feet. Plans and application file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mrs. Vivian Simmons, 8821 Katella Avenue, applicant, addressed the Council advising that in her opinion the denial was made without reason or logic, and not supported by concrete objections9 further in her opinion, one of the Planning Commissioners should have disqualified himself due to the fact that he lived in the area. Mrs. Simmons called attention to the heavily traveled Brookhurst Street, and advised that the home has been for sale for eight months, and no one was interested nor was financing available for a home on this site. The increase in taxes without benefit of use of the property has been a burden, and in addition there is presently existing commercial across the street in both blocks to the North and South. Mrs. Simmons felt that the Deed Restrictions on the tract were not a valid argument in this matter as the character of the property has changed the practical aspects of this condition, and further advised that the opposition has always advanced the matter of deed restriction but have done nothing about the violations that have occurred in the tract, by the addition of second stories to dwellings and conducting businesses from some of the homes. Attention was called to the indepartmental report, regarding possible use of the property for multiplG or commercial development. Mrse Simmons noted other areas where single lots have been granted commercial use, and stated that the granting of the requested use would be a substantial asset to the Lincoln Park Tract; that parking would not be a pro- blem because the building would be small and the general appearance would be very much improved by the erection of an attractive service type building. Mrs. Simmons submitted a petition favoring said application, signed by residents representing fourteen properties in the area. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in support of said reclassification. 7399 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 7~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. L, G. Wunch, 2183 Niobe, addressed the Council calling atten- tion to the high volume of traffic on Brookhurst Street and favored said reclassification. The Mayor asked if anyon~ else wished to address the Council in favor of subject reclassification, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. - Mr. Cornelius Moyer, 2173 Victoria Avenue, stated that of the thirty-five residents who signed the petition of opposition submitted at the public hearing before the City Planning Commission, thirty-four live in the area bounded by Brookhurst Street, Broadway, Garnet Street and Hiawatha Avenue~ He further stated that many of the addresses represented on the petition in favor of subject application were well removed from the immediate area. Mr. Moyer was of the opinion that because the applicant resides in a different section of the city, she may not be as familiar with conditions in the neighborhood as are those who live there. Mayor Coons read the petition in favor of C-l Zoning, noting addresses as listed thereon containing 26 signatures representing fourteen parcels of property. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to adress the Council. Mr. E. G. Yeager, 2177 Hiawatha Avenue, advised of the heavy traffic within their subdivision, and he was not in favor of increasing this problem by addition of a business. He further advised that children in the neighborhood are too far from their school playground to make use of it outside of school hours, and he suggested that a park be established on some of the nearby undeveloped land which is commercially zoned. Mr. Dick Tevlin, 106 Echo, stated that the property has been declared zoned single family residential~ as approved by the City Council, and called attention to the existing R-A zoned properties in the tract which have been tentatively approved for R-l zoning~ He reported that his home is adjacent to Lincoln Avenue, a busier street than Brookhurst, and the traffic noises did not disturb him~ -, Mrs. S. E. Jacobs, 2181 Hiawatha Avenue, addressed the Council concurring in Mr. Yeagerqs statement regarding the need for a park where youngsters could go for recreation, and she failed to see the necessity for more commercial zoning in the area~ In rebuttal, Mrs. Simmons stated that if there was a house on the lot in question, she could possibly sell the property; however, with home financing unavailable for this property, the rezoning seems the only solution to the problem. She advised that she has owned the property four years, and although she was aware of the deed restrictions, she did not fully realize the significance thereof. Mr. Lowell Hawkins, 2177 Victoria, reported that the applicant purchased the home adjacent to subject lot in 1956, and approximately four years later, acquired the adjacent vacant property. Mrs. M. Zustiak, 2108 Hiawatha, was of the opinion that to grant this application would open the door to rezoning requests from other owners of properties adjacent to Brookhurst Street. Mrs. Stella Chavos, 1903 West Embassy, representing Lincoln Park Civic Association, reported that some home owners in the subdivision have added a second story room to their homes, however their deed restrictions limit the Lincoln Park Tract to single family residential dwellings. She advised that, according to the City Attorney, the Anaheim Municipal Code allows one and one-half stories in the R-l Zone, and one room on the second floor results in three-quarters of a dwelling being single story, which complies with the Code. Mrs. Chavos requested that their deed restrictions be upheld. -.- 7400 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTE,S - January 7_ 1964, 1:30 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held regarding the five lots in the area which side on to Brookhurst Street, and consideration was given to the widen- ing of said street and to the possibility of constructing masonry walls on the westerly property lines of the lots$ Also noted was a recent similar request at the corner of Niobe and Brookhurst Streets which was denied. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-IO: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-IO for adoption, concurring with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, denying Reclassification No. 63-64-59. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (63-64-59) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None The Mayor declared Resolution NO$ 64R-IO duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-60 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 504: Submitted by Earle and Cecelia K. Brooks, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and permission to establish a planned townhouse residential de- velopment with waiver of the following: 1. Garages, to construct carports. 2. One-story height limitation within 150 feet of R-A property. 3. Alley access to permit ingress and egress from proposed street. Property briefly described as located on the south side of Savanna Street extending southerly to the Pacific Electric Railway Right-of-way, approximately 1020 feet west of Knott Avenue (3620 Savanna Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 977, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolu- tion No. 978, Series 1963-64, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 504. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the hearing before the City Planning Commission, by reading excerpts of the minutes of said meeting$ Reference was made to Finding No.4 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 977, Series 1963-64. Mr. Kreidt further advised that upon visiting the location, it was found that the area was completely rural in character. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Tom Johnston, representing Lomar Developers, advised that the entire area is in the process of change, and that they wish to develop the area; however, since the applications have been recommended for denial, and in the event the City Council concurred in these recommendations, and upon the advise of a member of the Planning Staff, they have prepared an alternative plan subdividing the property into eleven lots upon which they would propose to construct duplex units. Mr. Johnston further advised that they would prefer to develop the property R-3 as originally planned. - -"'.....~"~"~:~,,. --~ 7401 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7. 1964, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Coons stated that any alternative plan that would be offered, and would be such a marked change from the original plan would be referred back to the Planning Commission for report. Mr. Joe Long, President of Lomar Developers, 9776 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, referred to the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, and further advised. 1. Regarding water supply: Upon checking with the City Water Department, they have been advised that city water would be available. 2. Resarding Invasion of privacy: It was noted that there are no single story limitations in an R-l Zone, further, the alternative plan is a single story development. 3. Regarding keeping the area rural in character, Mr. Brooks, the present owner of the property will comment on this matter~ Mr. Long presented the plot plan indicating eleven over minimum size lots, plus elevation plans of proposed duplex units. Mr. Earle Brooks, 3620 Savanna Street, owner of subject property, advised that they wish to develop the property due to the fact that over the past ten years the value of the land has increased, resulting in an increase in taxes to a point wnpre it is no longer practical to maintain the property for the purpose of raising orses. He called attention to the development in the area during the past ten years, noting that there is no longer a place to ride horses. Mr. Brooks further advised that the row of eucalyptus trees next to the railroad track at the south boundary of the property, has become a nuisance and a hazardous area, because of children congregating at this loca- tion and mischievously tormenting the horses, in addition there is a great danger of fire. He sited incidents where the police and fire authorities have been called, and reported that it is an area that is inaccessible for police patrol. In his opinion the situation would be eliminated with the development of the property as proposed. ..-, Mr. Brooks felt that those in opposition to their request feared development will result in their loss of a right to keep animals. Mr. Long noted existing conditions in the area pertaining to the keeping of animals which are in conflict with the Anaheim Municipal Code. A letter received from Mrs. Barbara Middleton objecting to subject reclassification, stating her reasons therefor, was submitted and read. Mrs. Ann Logan, 3603 Savanna Drive, addressed the Council and re- iterated objections presented by her before the City Planning Commission, briefly as follows: 1. Financial burden due to the eventual street improvement, street' lighting, etc. 2. The Mutual Water Company can not supply sufficient water. 3. Noise created by considerable increase in traffic. 4. Children may trespass and tease animals, and damage fruit trees. 5. Two story units would be an invasion to their privacy. 6. Decrease in the value of the propertyo c~_,,_,~!.....,,_. .,."'..,i.._""-"'......._"................, ~~i!V 7402 City Hal14 Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M. Mrs~ Logan requested the area be permanently maintained as rural in character. Mrse Laura Wiebalk, 3629 Savanna Drive, Secretary of Savanna Mutual Water Company, advised that they only have sufficient water for the existing development. Mrs. Wiebalk referred to the by-laws of the company, which state that no one can become a member of the water company unless he is an owner of a minimum of one-fourth acre, she questioned how lots in the proposed tract of less than one-fourth acre could obtain water. Mayor Coons stated, he believed it had been established that if the development was approved, the City would extend water to the project, and further explained the CityVs procedure of existing water mains and a front foot charge when connections to said mains are made. Mrs. Vivian Shields, 3640 Savanna Drive, felt that before units could be sold, the property would require subdivision. It was explained to Mrs. Shields that the application before the City Council was for a planned multiple family development, however, if the property is developed into an R-2 development, a subdivision map would be filed. Mr. Richard Tetrow, 2136 West Savanna, addressed the Council opposing said application, advising that in his opinion the development would not be an asset to the area, further that the majority of people are satisfied with the rural character of the area and requested be retained. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to present additional evidence, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-II: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-ll denying Conditional Use Permit No. 504. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 504. On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 64R-Il was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-Il duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-60: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, Reclassification No. 63-64-60 was referred back to the City Planning Commission for consideration of a lesser zone, and public hearing reopened and continued by the City Council to February 4, 1964, 7:00 P. M. MOTION CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Council adjourned for Executive Session for the purpose of considering a personnel matter~ MOTION CARRIED. (9:23 P. M.) ADJOURNMENT: City Council returned from Executive Session 9:46 P. M. and adjourned on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. SIGNED:~~~, ~ Ci ty Clerk