Loading...
1972/12/12City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. LIBRARY BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ARCHITECT'S FEES: Councilman Thom requested report from Mr. Murdoch regarding letter received from Mrs. Schultz of the Library Board recommending that architect's fees be paid from revenue sharing funds. Mr. Murdoch replied that he is presently in the process of preparing a priority list of projects together with reasons for their priority, as sug- gested by all Department heads, which is anticipated will be brought before the Council on December 12, 1972. At that time he reported,the Council will have opportunity to add, delete or realign the priorities as they may find necessary, and all of the projects recently discussed will be included. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn to December 12, 1972, 10:00 a.m. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Signed Adjourned: 5 :20 P.M. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 10:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. OPPOS TI(1 TO THE CHINO HILLS AIRPORT COMPLEX PROPOSAL: Mayor Dutton stated that this adjourned regular meeting had been called for the purpose of allowing those in opposition to the Chino Hills Airport an opportunity to be heard. The presentation supporting the airport proposal was given before the Anaheim City Council at an adjourned regular meeting on November 21, 1972. Colonel M. A. Barnes (U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, ret.), 18921 Vista Real, Yorba Linda, stated his appearance represented his family and neighbors in Yorba Linda who are all opposed to the airport. He advised that he has heard several presentations by the proponents for the airport, and they have failed to demonstrate for an airport of the type proposed in the Chino Hills location. He cited the fact that there are two fairly large airports within a reasonable distance, Orange County and Ontario either of which is capable of handling the type of traffic proposed for the Chino Hills Airport. Colonel Barnes further advised that many of the people who now reside in Yorba Linda and surrounding areas have selected this area because they wished to avoid congestion, noise and other attendant irritations which an airport brings into the community. According to his experience, living near O'Hare Airport, Chicago, Colonel Barnes remarked that an airport generates a large amount of dirt as a result of fuel residue from the airplanes, which dirt tends to collect on anything left outside. He further felt that Mr. Lowman's statement that the newer aircraft will be less noisy, is extremely optimistic. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 10 :00 A.M. Regarding the safety factor, Colonel Barnes referred to the recent tragic accident outside of Midway Airport, Chicago, which involved not only the aircraft and passengers, but also people on the ground, which he felt indicates airports are hazardous in built up areas. From the proponent's own presentation, this airport would attract development of an industrial, recre- ational and service nature in its environs, Colonel Barnes stated the residents of his neighborhood would object to such high density encroachment upon their community and would further object to airplanes flying over their homes, schools and city. Colonel Barnes' further objection was based on the engineering fea- sibility of the plan, which shows a 500 -foot difference in elevation between the highest and lowest point of the runways requiring an unusual amount of earth moving to level. He stated that as a taxpayer he would consider that there are many other sites which could be developed with less costly modifi- cations. The drainage problem would also be increased, and existing drainage structures built with taxpayers' money would require either replacement or improvement to handle the additional runoff caused by paving the top of Chino Hills for the runways. Colonel Barnes stated that questioning the representatives of Chino Hills Airport Complex Incorporated regarding the Environmental Impact Study has yielded no answers, other than the designs are not sufficiently complete to answer their questions. Mr. Arthur Schassberger, 245 Lilac Lane, Olinda Village, Treasurer, Olinda Village Homeowners Association, read a telegram which had been sent to the Anaheim City Council by Gary E. Kain, President of the association, in- dicating that the homeowners of Olinda Village have protested the Chino Hills Airport by petitions, meetings, personal letters and vocally, at the City, County, State and Federal levels and that this organization is categorically opposed to this plan as well as previous plans to build airports in that area. (The telegram was'read in full.) Referring to a statement made on November 21, 1972, that the only property which would have to be confiscated, should the airport plan be im- plemented, would be La Veta Mineral Springs, which is two miles from the run- ways, Mr. Schassberger advised that Olinda Village Elementary School, with an enrollment of 98 children, is located only 3/4 of a mile west of La Veta Min- eral Springs. This school has not been constructed with the sound attenuation or protective devices which would be necessary. The major portion of Olinda Village itself lies east and somewhat north of the school and Mr. Schassberger felt this area will be found to be within the 65 CNEL level. Hollydale Mobile Home Park which consists of 100 mobile homes is as close or closer to the pro- posed airport site as Olinda Village. He indicated his group had received 70 signatures from them in opposition to the airport. Mr. Laurence Haller, 18852 De Ville Drive, Yorba Linda, representa- tive of the PATCH organization presented a stack of cards which represent the names and addresses of approximately 700 people from the cities of Diamond Bar, Villa Park, Brea, Placentia, La Harbra, Hacienda Heights, Fullerton, Anaheim, Orange and Santa Ana who have expressed opposition to the Chino Hills Airport proposal. He additionally stated, he had 52 petitions, averaging 20 signatures each page, representing well over a 1,000 people who are not in favor of this proposal. He advised that the petitions were being held in abeyance for filing with the proper agency at the proper time. He related that the PATCH organi- zation is a group of concerned citizens, which was formed following the open meeting of the Yorba Linda City Council at which that Council declared they would not sponsor the airport nor approve it. Regarding the airport site itself, Mr. Haller advised the Council that the Chino Hills location had been rejected as a possible airport site after study by the Orange County Planning Department and the Orange County Airport Commission, both of which agencies recommended that it be eliminated as a pos- sible future airport site. A portion of this study includes a statement made by the FAA which indicated that the Chino Hills site was boxed -in by surrounding airports and that such an airport would contribute to the air traffic congestion in an area which is presently approaching saturation and would be objectionable from the standpoint of a safe and efficient airspace. The original airport plan 72 -828 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972 10 :00 A.M. was withdrawn in March 1972 probably so it would not be rejected by the FAA. The FAA then completely reversed its previous position and approved airspace for the Chino Hills site on an amended proposal in July, 1972. The amended proposal is essentially the same facility but smaller. A study released by SCRAS (Southern California Regional Airport Study) did not include Chino Hills as a recommended site for an airport, Mr. Haller reported. Mr. Haller noted there is no open area or large body of water nearby into which an airplane could dump fuel in an emergency. The Chino Hills Airport, if constructed, would be four miles northeast of Yorba Linda and with two operational runways handling 120,000 flights per year, this would constitute a commercial flight including jets every three or four minutes if the airport does not operate 24 -hours per day. Even more significant, Mr. Haller stated is the fact that the approval of airspace imposed no limitation on future expansion. In his experience, all airports are expanding operations. He cited statistics indicating a 507 increase in traffic at Los Angeles Inter- national and a 300% increase in three -years of international operation at Ontario. Mr. Haller stated further objection to the airport proposal based on the fact that according to a study conducted by the Yorba Linda School District, the necessary structural modifications to compensate for a nearby airport on four schools would cost 1.2 million dollars of non educational program funds. The Chino Hills location cannot be justified as an airport site in the opinion of the PATCH organization because of the proximity of airport services presently available at Ontario and Orange County. In summing up their opposition, Mr. Haller quoted from the Yorba Linda Star that "many people because they con- sider the airport plan to be illogical and badly conceived are ignoring it He stated they felt this was a dangerous presumption and their group will continue to work because they see this proposal as a threat to their environment. Councilman Dutton questioned Mr. Haller's statement regarding the 3007. increase in air traffic at Ontario Airport, reading statistics from the City of Los Angeles, Department of. Airports Financial Report for the fiscal period ending June 30, 1972, which revealed a decrease in total aircraft movements at all four airports included in this report. Councilman Dutton remarked that this most likely reflects the increased load capacity of the larger aircraft. (Report re- tained by Mayor Dutton.) Mr. Haller replied that Ontario Airport is not accepting larger aircraft unless forced to do so because of weather conditions elsewhere, and concurred with Councilman Dutton that total aircraft volume decreased in 1970 -71 but is again on the increase in 1972. Mr. Haller further remarked if the trend is decreased air traffic volume as the statistics show, then perhaps this invalidates to some extent the position taken by the proponents of Chino Hills Airport Complex as to the need for an additional airport. He further commented on the recent court decision placing responsibility for law suits against an airport with the sponsoring city or entity, and referred to law suits pending against the City of Santa Monica which total approximately three million dollars and law suits pending against Los Angeles International which are astronomical. Councilman Dutton referred to the fact that Los Angeles International has less than 4,000 acres whereas Chino Hills Airport Complex proposes to purchase 25,000 acres. He stated that Orange County Airport has similar problems with subdivisions springing up around airport property and remarked that air travel is here to stay and some solution should be sought. He mentioned his concern regard- ing this problem, recognizing that tourism is the third largest industry in the State of California being one billion 300 million dollars per year business, and is particularly important to the City of Anaheim where it is centered; Disneyland alone generating 82 million dollars of that figure with 22% of the visitors arriv- ing by air. He inquired whether the PATCH organization had any recommendations regarding the airport situation in Orange County. Mr. Haller stated he feels that the answer lies partially in advanced technology which will produce transport airplanes capable of short or vertical takeoffs and increased use of smaller commuter type airports. He further feels it would be unwise to use public funds to construct additional international airports when the need for them may be decreased. He stated that the proponents City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 10 :00 A.M. have used private funds for the research and study phase, but once actual construction begins this project would be publicly funded. Councilman Dutton referred to Colonel Lowman's statement that the airport would be financed by revenue bonds secured ,by the future earnings of the airport and the fact that Los Angeles International is realizing a profit while retiring their bonds. Mr. Haller indicated that he travels by air frequently and finds the Ontario Airport convenient except for the limited flight schedules, but felt this situation will be improved as more people use that facility. Mr. Ben Rogers, 107 Orange Hill Lane, Anaheim, addressed the Council to protest the Chino Hills Airport proposal, stating that he moved to his pre- sent neighborhood because of its quiet residential quality and certainly would not care to'live in such close proximity to a large airport as would be the case if the Chino Hills site is used. He stated that he was not aware of much public notification regarding the airport plans and that he felt wider pub- licity would have produced a larger turnout for this meeting. He also sug- gested that an evening meeting be held to allow more working people an oppor- tunity for input. He noted that ground surface transportation systems would seriously be effected by this proposal. In addition he voiced his objection to the fact that the proponents of the airport stand to profit from its implementation without having to pay any remuneration for the ecological damages created; nor for the sound proofing of the schools, or the drainage improvements required; nor for the discomfort or hearing damages incurred by those living in the area. He suggested that alternate sites such as Lancaster or Palmdale be considered because of the lower population density. Councilman Dutton informed the Assembly that the City of Anaheim has taken a "hands off" position on this proposal, however, when a resolution was introduced at the Orange County League of Cities meeting regarding the proposal, it was felt prior to Anaheim taking a position on the issue they should hear pros and cons to the proposal and this was the purpose of scheduling additional meetings November 21 and December 12, 1972. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no reply declared the hearing closed. Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn, Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 10 :50 A.M. 72 -829 72 -830 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alone M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Chaplain John G. Bevan of the Anaheim Memorial Hospital gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held November 7 and 14, 1972, and Adjourned Regular Meeting held November 21, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. Because of absence, Mayor Dutton abstained from voting on approval of the Minutes of November 14, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF R$ADI TG ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,421,482.53, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. SALE OF CITX OWNED PROPERTY RECEIVED IN FEE FOR SEWER EASEMENT (TRACT NO. 7911): Councilman Pebley reported, after personally checking Tract Map No. 7911, that the 15 -foot wide strip of City owned property was in fact the rear 15 feet of the 100 -foot depth of seven lots in the tract. Further, the City had acquired the property in 1965 at a price of approximately $4,700.00. Councilman Pebley stated that without the purchase of this additional 15 feet the developer would be required to revise his tract map and would lose two full lots. In light of the new information obtained, Councilman Pebley was of the opinion that the price of $2,500.00 offered to Mr. Welk for subject property was inequitable. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council rescinded their action of December 5, 1972 of offer to sell certain City owned property adjacent to Tract No. 7911 to Mr. Welk for $2,500.00. MOTION CARRIED. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, subject City owned property adjacent to Tract No. 7911 was offered for sale to Mr. Welk for the original amount paid by the City in 1965, plus 6% interest for each year the City has owned the property. MOTION CARRIED. In answer to inquiry by Councilman Thom, the City Attorney advised that the property was reported to be unusable for municipal purposes and should be put back on the taxrolls. Inasmuch as the property had been acquired in fee and not by easement deed, the City Attorney's Office recommended sale thereof at a very nominal figure. PRESENTATION: Don R. Sparks, President of Anaheim Hills Golf Club, read aloud a resolution conferring Honorary Membership Number 13, on Mayor Dutton in the Anaheim Hills Golf Club and presented him with the resolution and an Anaheim Hills Golf Club emblem. Mayor Dutton expressed his sincere gratitude for the membership and the emblem. ANAHEIM wont OF COMMERCE REQUEST ANAHEIM CELEBRITY GOLF INVITATIONAL. FIRST ANA4FIII STA& PLSY: Request of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for City participation and sponsorship in the Anaheim Celebrity Golf Invitational, First Anaheim Star 72 -831 City Hall. Anaeim. California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Play, for representation of the City on the Tournament Committee and use of the Anaheim Hills Golf Course on May 5 and 6, 1973 was submitted, together with recommendations of Parks and Recreation Director. Jose Arias, Jr., Tournament Chairman, explained that the purpose of the golf tournament was twofold: 1. The City of Anaheim needs additional focus with their new Anaheim Hills Golf Cours. 2. It is a fund raising event for the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, with all proceeds going to the Chamber. Mr. Arias reported that a member of the Disneyland Park staff, who is on the Committee, has drafted a logo illustrating Andy Anaheim swinging a golf club, to be used for publicity purposes. Mr. Arias stated that for the pleasure of playing with a movie or television star personality or prominent athlete, a player would be asked to give a $100.00 donation. Because of his rapport with Vice President Agnew, Mr. Arias indicated it was his intention to invite the Vice President to participate in the tourna- ment which would definitely be a drawing factor. Mr. Arias felt that the tournament would be very successful, bring to Anaheim an annual tournament and perhaps eventually evens PGA open. Mr. Arias requested the City to provide the Committee with an estim- ated cost for use of the Anaheim Hills Golf Course May 5 and 6, 1973, based on an average of weekend activity at the course, and for rental of carts. Mayor Dutton stated that the Council was under the impression that the Chamber wished to use the golf course on a free basis, which in their opin- ion, would be setting an undesirable precedent. Mayor Dutton stated that after listening to Mr. Arias's presentation, he clearly understood this was not the intention of the Chamber. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by .Councilman Sneegas, use of the Anaheim Hills Golf Course by the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce on May 5 and 6, 1973, for the Anaheim Celebrity Golf Invitational, First Anaheim Star Play Tournament was approved in principle with details to be pursued on a mutually satisfactory basis. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST SOLICITATION PERMIT AND WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEE: Submitted by Jerry Lafferty, Agape Force, for permission to conduct door to door missionary work, to solicit donations for distributing copies �f a religious book in conjunction therewith, and waiver of the business license fee. Mayor Dutton asked for clarification of Council policy limiting fund raising activities to local organizations. Assistant City Manager Robert Davis advised that the policy does re- strict fund raising activities to local orghnization and that the majority of the funds derived therefrom be used locally. Mr. Davis durther advised that numerous unsuccessful attempts had been made to contact the Agape Force to determine whether their prime purpose was to conduct missionary work and solicitation of funds thereto incidental or whether the prime purpose was soliciting for specific aim. Larry Humphreys, a member of the Agape Force explained to the Council their prime objective was to conduct missionary work door to door, to give residents a copy of the book, the Sword and the Switchblade, and in return solicit a donation for the book. He further explained that the Agape Force had a discipleship training school taught by ordained, interdenominational ministers located in Fresno and at present their needs have outgrown this facility and they are attempting to raise funds to open a new school, perhaps in the Santa Rosa area. Mr. Humphreys stated his organization attempts to reach kids who are on drugs and rehabilitate them back tb a christian standard of living. Mayor Dutton asked Mr. Humphreys if he was familiar with the Melody land Drug Preventidh Center and their efforts, to which he replied, "yes Councilman Pebley aired the sentiments of many Anaheim residents who had personally expressed to him their dissatisfaction with the numerous solicitation permits granted by the City. 1 72-832 City Hall. Anaheim. Califinia COUNCIL MINIMS Decgmer 12. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Councilmen Thom and Sneegas voiced their opinions that the City cannot discriminate in granting solicitation permits and that citizens themselves must control the activity at their door by declining to donate. Mr. Humphreys interjected, it is not their policy to irritate people and when they are told "no thank you," the solicitor then leaves the residence. Mayor Dutton questioned what percentage of the money collected would actually be used in Anaheim. Mr. Humphreys estimated it to be 50 In contrast, however, he stated that the only funds spent in Anaheim were those for living expenses, plus gaso- line to transport the force in the City, and for expenses incurred in holding outreach meetings (singing and speaking) in parks, parking lots and on other public property, with all remaining funds being deposited in Fresno. That their main purpose is to get the books in the homes, however, if the person gives nothing the book usually is not given, as they do need the finances to carry on this work. Councilman Sneegas asked the City Attorney what the business license fee for this activity is. City Attorney Geisler answered that if you are solely ministering door to door, there is no business license fee; if you are ministering and giving a book away in connection therewith and people voluntarily donate, there is no fee required; however, if you are ministering and giving a book away in connection therewith and soliciting for a donation for the book, then it is a $25.00 business license fee per person because you are, in fact, selling the book. Councilman Sneegas questioned if it is then a matter of presentation, to which the City Attorney answered in the affirmative. The City Attorney advised that the Agape Force request does not con form to Council policy as their financial statement for the year ending 1971 reflects more than 90% of the funds collected going to the organization for support and maintenance. In his opinion the monies collected were being used for office and living expenses only and were not being collected for religious or charitable purposes. Councilman Pebley asked Mr. Humphreys if his organization operated outside of California, to which he answered yes, in Texas. Councilman Pebley asked if the organization in the past had ever operated in Hawaii. Mr. Humphreys stated he has been with the organization only for the past eight months and had no knowledge of such an operation. Councilman Pebley cited, and Mayor Dutton concurred, instances in Hawaii where organizations such as the Agape Force were holding religious meetings in the public streets and these activities had a definite detrimental effect on the adjacent businesses. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, request of the Agape Force for permission to conduct door to door missionary work and solicitation of donations for distributing copies of a religious book in conjunc- tion therewith, and waiver of business license fee, were denied. MOTION CARRIED. Lewis Dexter, 305 North Ranchito, a citizen from the audience addressed the Council in favor of the request submitted by the Agape Force. Prior to adjournment of this meeting, Mr. Humphreys asked for clarifi- cation of the reasons for denial of this request. The City Attorney again explained, in detail, the applicable provi- sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-18 EXTENSION OF TIME: Requests of H. N. Berger and Hugh R. W. McNeil dated October 9, 1972, for extension of time in order to complete required conditions of approval of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -18 proposed R -3 zoned property located on the south side of Broadway, between Loara Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, was submitted. Also submitted were report of the City Engineer and report and recommendation of the Development 72 -833 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Services Department, recommending that an extension of time be granted to Reclassification No. 71- 72 -18, retroactive to June 7, 1972, and extending to June 7, 1973. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, an extension of time to Reclassification No. 71- 72 -18, retroactive to June 7, 1972, and extending to June 7, 1973, was granted, as recommended by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NOS. 69 -70 -25 AND 70 -71 -25 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 7137, 7450 AND 7666 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Jeffrey H. Millet, Millet -King Assoc- iates, representing J. W. Klug Development Company, dated September 19, 1972, for a one -year extension of time to complete required conditions of approval of Reclassification Nos. 69 -70 -25 and 70 -71 -25 and Tentative Tract Nos. 7137, 7450 and 7666, proposed RS -5000 zoned property located between Esperanza Road and the Santa Ana River, east of Imperial Highway, was submitted. Also sub- mitted were reports and recommendations of the City Engineer and the Develop- ment Services Department recommending approval. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, ex- tension of time to Reclassification Nos. 69 -70 -25 and 70- 71 -25, retroactive to February 9, 1972, and extending to February 9, 1974 and one -year extensions of time to Tentative Tract Nos. 7137, 7450 and 7666, to expire December 7, 1973, were granted, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7471, REVISION NO. 1 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of John C. Vann, Jr., Ponderosa Homes, dated November 8, 1972, for an extension of time to complete required conditions of approval of Tentative Tract No. 7471, Revision No. 1, proposed RS -5000 zoned property (Reclassification No. 70- 71 -25) located south of Esperanza Road, east of Imperial Highway, was submitted. Also submitted were reports and recommendations of the City Engineer and the Develop- ment Services Department recommending a one -year extension of time, to expire December 7, 1973, subject to approval of extension of time to Reclassification No. 70- 71 -25; that an Environmental Impact Report be approved for Tentative Tract No. 7471 within 30 days; and that the development of Tract No. 7471 shall include the construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating within and arriving at the tract to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a one -year extension of time to Tentative Tract No. 7471, Revision No. 1, to expire December 7, 1973, was granted, subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer and the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2390 REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION: Request for exemption declaration status from requirements for filing of an Environmental Impact Report pertaining to Variance No. 2390 for construction of a room addition on R -1 zoned property located on the southwest corner of Vermont Avenue and Caplan Street was sub- mitted, together with report of the Development Services Department. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, it was the finding of the City Council that said project would be trivial in nature and declared it exempt from the requirement for filing of an Environ- mental Impact Report. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2372 REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION: Request for exemption declaration status from requirements for filing of an Environmental Impact Report pertain- ing to Variance No. 2372 for construction of additional duplex on R -2 zoned property located on the west side of Claudine Street, north of Wilhelmins Street, was submitted, together with report of the Development Services Department. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, it was the finding of the City Council that said project would be trivial in nature and declared it exempt from the requirement for filing of an Environ- mental Impact Report. MOTION CARRIED. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 71 -2E: Submitted by D. L. Hooper, Anaheim Hills, Inc., proposing to install private six -inch irrigation sleeves in the existing right of way, Anaheim Hills Road and La Paz Way, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road. 72 -834 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Also submitted was report of the City Engineer recommending approval subject to the Applicant replacing any asphaltic concrete pavement or land- scaping which may be removed, lost or damaged in connection with the making of any repairs or replacements of its facilities. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, it was determined by the City Council that said project would be trivial in nature and that no Environmental Impact Statement by the City Council would be required. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R- 581: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -581 for adoption, approving Encroachment Permit No. 71 -2E, subject to the City Engineer's recommendation. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WITH TEXACO VENTURES, INC. AND ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. (71 -2E) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -581 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -582 WORK ORDER NO. 651 B: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -582 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BALL ROAD STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, FROM EUCLID STREET TO BROOKHURST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 651 -B. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTH- ORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened January 4, 1973, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -582 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -583 WORK ORDER NO. 793: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -583 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE MANZANITA PARK CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AND MASONRY WALL, NORTH END OF RIVIERA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 793. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened January 4, 1973, 2 :00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -583 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -584 WORK ORDER NO. 1513: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -584 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: CARPETING AND FLOOR COVERING, ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE, 6601 WALNUT CANYON ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1513. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened December 28, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -584 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -585 WORK ORDER NO. 1511: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -585 for adoption. Refer to Resolution. Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE PARKING LOT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1511. (John B. Ewles) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -585 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -586 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -586 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Sandman Motels, Inc.; Del Amo, a limited partnership; United Methodist Church of Anaheim; Johnson/Bell Enterprises; Hazel I. Maag; Hazel I. Maag) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: CdtJNCILMEN: Stephenson 72 -835 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -586 duly passed and adopted. 72 -836 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972. 1:30 P.M. PURCHASE Of EQUIPMENT THREE PHASE TRANSFORMERS: Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 3 three phase transformers as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX General Electric Co., Anaheim $13,931.40 Westinghouse Electric Supply, Anaheim 14,666.40 McGraw Edison, Los Angeles 14,721.00 H. K. Porter, Los Angeles 15,473.85 Wagner Electric NO BID Allis Chalmers NO BID On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager and the Electrical Divison, Councilman Dutton moved that the low bid of General Electric Company be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $13,931.40, including tax. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT SUPERVISORY CABLE: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 26 MFT. #1819 cable and 10 MFT. #2519 cable as follows,and recommended the award to Graybar Electric as the lowest and best qualified bid meeting specifications: VENDOR McPeek Chrysler Plymouth, Anaheim Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana LaHabra Dodge, La Habra McCoy Ford, Anaheim Anaheim Dodge Guardian Chevrolet TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Graybar Electric, Anaheim $11,828.88 Maydwell- Hartzell, Los Angeles 11,828.88 Superior Wholesale, Riverside 11,410.04 West. Electric Supply, Anaheim 14,826.00 General Electric Supply, Anaheim NO QUOTE On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager and the Electrical Division, Councilman Pebley moved that the bid of Graybar Electric in the amount of $11,828.88, including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid, as the low bid received did not meet specifications. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT WALK IN CARGO VAN: The Assistant City Manager reported on an informal bid received from McCoy Ford for a large -size cargo van in the amount of $3,236.47. He advised that the City modified the specifications by changing the large -size cargo van to a small walk -in cargo van and McCoy Ford, the lowest bidder, has agreed to the same base price with the added options of disc brakes, power steering and larger front springs, bringing the total to $3,653.95, includ- ing tax. On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Sneegas moved that the low bid of McCoy Ford, together with the minor modifications re- quested by the City, be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $3,653.95, including tax. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT INTERMEDIATE SEDANS: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 14 intermediate sedans as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX $43,178.31 45,436.67 46,372.91 46,654.89 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilmafi Sneegas, the low bid of McPeek Chrysler Plymouth was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $43,178.31, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF. EQUIPMENT STANDARD SIZE SEDANS: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 6 standard size sedans as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: 72 -837 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX. McCoy Ford, Anaheim $21,748.17 McPeek Chrysler Plymouth, Anaheim 21,909.51 Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana 22,035.83 La Habra Dodge, La Habra 22,488.73 On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low bid McCoy Ford was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $21,748.17, including tax. MOTION CARRIED, PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT STATION WAGONS: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of two station wagons for the police Department as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, LESS TRADE- IN,PLUS SALES TAX Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana $6,915.20 Anaheim American Motors, Anaheim 7,071.83 La Habra Dodge, La Habra 7,359.53 McCoy Ford, Anaheim 7,491.62 On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low bid of Santa Ana Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $6,915.20, less trade -in, plus sales tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT POLICE UNITS: The Assistant City Manager reported on in- formal bids received for the purchase of 19 police units as follows, And recom- mended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX, LESS TRADE -IN Anaheim American Motors, Anaheim $65,153.60 Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana 60,435.96 La Habra Dodge, La Habra 61,975.49 McCoy Ford, Anaheim 65,996.08 On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low bid of Santa Ana Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $60,435.96, including tax, less trade -in. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT 10,000 G.V.W. WALK -IN CARGO VAN: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 10,000 g.v.w. walk in cargo van as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Woods G.M.C., Anaheim $5,317.20 McCoy Ford, Anaheim 5,794.34 Anaheim Dodge NO QUOTE Guardian Chevrolet NO QUOTE Santa Ana Dodge NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low bid of Woods G.M.C. was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $5,317.20, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT 24,000 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS :'4;The.Aesistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of five 24,000 g.v.w. cab and chassis as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX International Harvester, Anaheim Woods, G.M.C., Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim- Santa Ana Dodge; Saltta Ana $31,201.80 32,807.03 29,174.24 28,430.80 72 -838 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of International Harvester was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $31,201.80, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. (CHASE OF EQUIPMENT NEW DATA PROCESSING BILLING FORMS: The Assistant City Manager reported on the recommended first -time printing of new Data Processing billing forms required for the new utility billing system and advised that Moore Business Forms has submitted a quotation for a one -year supply in the amount of $6,751.55, including tax. Inasmuch as the quality on the first -time printing is very im- portant for future reorders; that past vendor performance has shown that Moore Business Forms has not had to rerun an order for forms designed for computer use; and the time element involved on this order does not allow for the possibility of a required rerun caused by a vendor's printing error, the Assistant City Manager recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase was authorized in the amount of $6,751.55, including tax, as recommended by the Assistant City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim submitted by Mrs. Harold F. Jackson for a purported monetary loss sustained as a result of an electrician's service call for loss of electric- ity, on or about December 2, 1972. b. Claim submitted by Buel W. Dunham, Attorney, on behalf of Mrs. Josephine Wood, for purported personal injuries resulting from stepping into a recessed water meter vault, on or about September 27, 1972. 1972. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 72 -1272 Re: Air Pollution. b. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Minutes November 17, c. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes October 16, 1972. d. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of October, 1972. Electrical Divison Utilities Department Engineering Divison Public Works Department MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3103: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3103 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance, Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1 OF THE ANAHEIM MUVICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 1.13 AND INCLUDING THEREIN SECTIONS 1.13.010 TO 1.13.080 BOTH INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO CREATING AND ESTABLISHING A "POLICE RESERVE CORPS," PROVIDING FOR ITS USE AND CONTROL AND FOR COMPENSATION IN THE EVENT OF INJURY, DISABILITY OR DEATH OF ITS MEMBERS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3103 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3104: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3104 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61 -62 -69 (52) M -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3104 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3105: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3105 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69 -70 -43 (2) M -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3105 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3106: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3106 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -43 C -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3106 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3107: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3107 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -55 R -2) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3107 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3108: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3108 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72 -73 -25 R -A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson 72 -839 72 -840 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3108 duly passed and. adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3109 KATHRYN LINDSAY ANNEXATION (R -A): Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3109 as an urgency ordinance for adoption. Said ordinance was read in full by the Deputy City Clerk. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. (Kathryn- Lindsay Annexation R -A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3109 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3110: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3110 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -13 (2) R -2) ORDINANCE NO. 3111: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3111 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69 -70 -25 (1) RS -5000) ORDINANCE NO. 3112:. Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3112 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66 -67 -61 (55) C -R) ORDINANCE NO. 3113: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3113 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -52 C -1) ORDINANCE NO. 3114: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3114 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72 -73 -19 R -3) RESOLUTION NO. 72R -587: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -587 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ROY MILLAR FOR THE OPERATION OF A FOOD AND BEVERAGE CONCESSION AT THE ANAHEIM HILLS MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -587 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST ANAHEIM HILLS INC.: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported a letter has been received from Anaheim Hills Inc. requesting. City participation, as the adjacent property owner, in undergroundiug a 12KVIine on Nohl Ranch Road and Anaheim Hills Golf Clubhouse entrance. He advised that funds had not been bud- geted for this project and source of funding would have to be revenue sharing or Council Contingency Fund. 72 -841 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12,_1972. 1:30 P.M. William J. Stark, President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated that there is a significant visual impairment involving seven existing poles that cross the intersection of Nohl Ranch Road and the Anaheim Hills Golf Course Clubhouse entrance and it is their desire to underground this line at this time because final street construction is near completion. Mr. Stark sug- gested that inasmuch as the line is City owned and could extend across the City owned parking lot of the clubhouse, perhaps it would be in order for the City Council to authorize the Electrical Division to proceed with the undergrounding design and obtain a final cost estimate, and if, at the con- clusion, there is still no City envolvement or the route is such that it is in public rights of way or streets, Anaheim Hills, Inc. will pay for the undergrounding. Mayor Dutton questioned Mr. Stark if Anaheim Hills had changed its position regarding undergrounding of the existing 12KV electrical line of Nohl Ranch Road. Mr. Stark answered it has always been their intention to underground this line as it does not fade out against the hillsides as other lines in the canyons do. He concluded with the fact that inasmuch as the City is the ad- jacent property owner, Anaheim Hills felt the City should be given an oppor- tunity to participate in the project. Discussion was held by the Council as to the City's responsibility and at the conclusion thereof, it was the consensus of opinion that the City, as the adjacent property owner, participate in the undergrounding of this 12KV line in Nohl Ranch Road by providing the design and the Electrical Division was authorized to proceed. LETTER PROPOSAL POLICE FACILITY IMPROVEMENT: The Assistant City Manager re- ported that a letter proposal dated December 7, 1972, from Marion J. Varner Associates, Architects, has been submitted, outlining a proposed study to be made to bring the Police Department shooting range up to Federal Industrial safety standards and Los Angeles County Department of Health standards. The proposal further includes investigating the feasibility of using the existing City Civil Defense Control Center for the Police Communi- cation Command Center area; possible redesign and improvement of the identi- fication bureau; centralized police facility storage; and upgrading building security and safety, for a $2,500.00 fee. Mr. Davis advised that upon completion of the report and cost estimate and if the City proceeds with the recommendations, Marion J. Varner Associates would provide plans, specifications, engineering and super- vision during construction for the standard architectural fee of 127. for alteration type projects, allowing credit from the report costs against the total standard architectural fee. Councilman Sneegas asked about past design work performed by Marion J. Varner Associates. Mr. Davis advised that they are highly recommended by the Inter- national Association of Chiefs of Police that they were considered at the time of the original design of the present police buildings, and that they have designed numerous police and public safety buildings. Councilman Sneegas voiced the opinion that he personally feels the shooting range should remain in the Police Department because it would eliminate inconvenience to the officers, encourage practice by the officers, and would eliminate additional cost to the City in transporting officers to a range in another location. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the letter proposal submitted by Marion J. Varner Associates, dated December 7, 1972, for a master plan study and report for certain improvement in the Police Department building for fee of $2,500.00, was accepted and implementation of tbg project was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -842 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1:30 P.M. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Transfer of $2,500.00 from the Council Contingency Fund to cover the expenditure for the Police Department Building Master Study and Report was authorized by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. SCHOOL TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: From action taken by the City Council on December 5, 1972, authorizing the formation of the School Traffic Safety Committee, the Assistant City Manager advised that Traffic Engineer,Edward Granzow, temporary chairman, is proceeding with the actual organization of the Committee. The proposal indicated there would be a staff representative of the City Council on the Committee. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the Assistant City Manager, Robert Davis, was appointed staff representative of the City Council to the School Traffic Safety Committee. MOTION CARRIED. SOUTHERN CAL4FORIIA EDISON CONDEMNATION NO. 7: The Assistant City Manager reported that Southern California Edison Condemnation No. 7 has now been completed, and the City is now providing electrical service for approximately 4,000 new customers in that area (area west of Dale, north of Orange Avenue, extending to the west City limits). FEDERAL REVEUE SHARING: The Assistant City Manager reported that the City has re- ceived its first revenue sharing check in the amount of $583,416.00 for the period of January 1 to July 1, 1972, noting that these funds have been deposited in a special fund for separate accounting thereof and that any interest earned must remain in that fund. He advised that the City Manager is near completion of a list of priorities for which these funds may be used and will be presenting it to the City Council. PINK BUS LINES APPLICATION: Councilman Thom referred to a memorandum dated November 21, 1971 from the City Attorney in which he advises that in view of additional information presented at the Public Utilities Commission hearing held November 15, 1972, on the Pink Bus Line application for a certificate of public conveni- ence and necessity to operate a passenger service on Harbor Boulevard, and in view of the opposition of the Orange County Transit District to the application, perhaps the City Council may wish to reconsider their previous action taken in approving the application of the Pink Bus Line. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council reversed their previous position and directed the records to reflect that the City of Anaheim opposed the application of the Pink Bus Line for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to operate upon Harbor Boulevard. MOTION CARRIED. CHINO HILLS AIRPORT COMPLEX: It was the general feeling of the City Council that in- sufficient evidence has been presented by both proponents and opposition for Council to take a position on the proposed Chino Hills Airport Complex and there- fore, the City of Anaheim would go on record at the Orange County League meeting to be held December 14, 1972, at Friedeman Hall as having no position on the pro- posed Chino Hills Airport Complex. EXPRESSION OF APPRECIATION: Homer Wallace, retired City Chief Building Inspector, ex- pressed his sincere appreciation to the City Council, the Anaheim Chamber of Com- merce, the City Manager and friends for the testimonial dinner given in his honor. Mayor Dutton expressed the feeling that he has never seen so many people pay to give tribute to someone for a job well done and stated that those in atten- dance were indeed his true friends. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Thom moved to recess to executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:35 P.M.) City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT: At the conclusion of executive session,and upon return of all Councilman to the Council Chambers, (with the exception of Councilman Stephenson) Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 6 :20 P.M. Signed Deputy City Clerk 1 72 -843 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES December 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Arthur Krebs of the First Congregational Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman W. J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the City Council Meetings held November 21 and 28, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. (Councilmen Dutton and Sneegas abstained from voting on Minutes of November 28, 1972, due to their absence). MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,304,040.31, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7875 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO.. 74: Developer, Calprop Corporation. Property located on the west side of Imperial Highway, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road and contains 80 R -2 zoned lots. Environmental Impact Report No. 74 with addendum concerning the al- ternative uses and Committee Analysis thereof, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom, Envir- onmental Impact Report No. 74 and addendum thereto, was adopted as the State- ment of the City Council. MOTION CARRIED.