1964/03/107578
City Hall. Anaheim~ C~lifornia..~.COUNCIL MINUTES - March 10~ 1964, 1:70 P.M~.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNClLNMN:
ABSENT:
PRESENI:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte (entered'the meeting 1:57 P.M.),
Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None
ASSISTANI CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held February 11, 18, 19 and
25, 1964~ were approved. (Councilman Dutton called attention to his absence
at the meeting held February 25, 1964.) NDTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION' ~0~ ~4R-148: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-148 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST IHE CIIY AS OF Nt~RCH 10, 1964.
(Warrants Nos. 30228 to 30530~ both inclusive~ totaling $1~144~002.11)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEN~ORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILN~N:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R~148 duly passed and' adopted.
RECLAS$IF..!C.6TION N0~..62-63-11: Request of Mr. John V. Thompson to re-evaluate
Council action pertaining to Reclassification No. 62-63-11 (Ordinance
No. 1867), to consider requiring wall construction on the west side of
subject property~ was submitted and reviewed by the City Council at their
meeting held March 3, 1964. (Property located on the north side of Orange-
wood Avenue~ approximately 630 feet west of Haster Street.)
Council action on said request was deferred to this date to allow
visual inspection of the area by the City Council.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
request to require the extension of wall along the west boundary of subject
property at this time, was denied. MOTION CARRIED.
~ONDITIONAL.USE~R~IT NO. 121: Request of Harry Knisely, Attorney for William
Behnke, Applicant, to delete the following Conditions of Resolution No.
63R-262 amending Resolution No. 7006 was deferred from the meeting of March
1964:
(a) Time limit of permit to June 27, 1966.
(b) Maximum size of trailers not to exceed 20 feet.
(c) Trailer stay within park limited to one week.
Mr. Harry Knisely addressed the Council advisin9 that in his
oW~n~on the restrictive conditions were imposed at a time when the nature
of development in the Disneyland area was not generally known; now that
the pattern of development has been established these restrictive conditions
are no longer necessary. Further, these conditions have created a hard-
ship in that the applicant is unable to obtain financing on the property.
7579
City Hal%, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL YIN.UTES ~ March 10,. 1964,..!~30 p~M~
Regarding maximum size trailers, Nit. Knisely reported that
the operation of travel-trailer parks and mobil-home_parks is regulated
by the Housing Division of the State of California, which allows a
maximum size of 8 feet by 40 feet in travel-trailer parks; further, the
State does not limit the length of time that travel-trailers may stay
in such parks. He noted that only one of the other four similar parks
in the City of Anaheim has any time limitation for duration of stay!
in addition, subject park is on a year to year basis, subject to inspec-
tion under the City License Ordinance.
In answer to Mayor Coon's question, Mr. Knisely explained that
the overniqht trailer parks are referred to as travel-trailer parks as
opposed mobil-home parks, the difference being basically-the maximum
size of trailer units allowed.
(Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 1,57 P.M.)
Council discussion was held and it was noted that Conditional
Use Permit No. 121 was originally approved June 27, 1961, for a period
of three years, and a two year extension of time was 9ranted to June 27,
1966. Also noted were the rigid conditions which have been imposed on
mobil-home parks in the City of Anaheim, such as landscaping, limitation
on square footage of trailers, etc. Mayor Coons noted the possibility
that if the time limit for duration of stay was removed, the travel-trailer
park 'could, in effect, become a mobil-home park.
Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that economics would govern
the length of time for which a trailer would be occupying space. He
called attention to the contrast between winter and summer seasons, both
in rates charged and percentage of occupancy, reporting that the summer
occupants are mostly vacationing families with children, whereas those
stopping in winter are frequently looking for work or preparing to purchase
a home. Mr. Kniselv felt that if any time limitation on trailer'stay was to
be imposed,-90 days would be reasonable.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler reported that according to State'
Law, the definition of "transient" is one who stays for. 30 days or less,
however the definition was determined in conjunction with consideration
of a room, or bed tax.
Mayor Coons noted that most of the other travel-trailer parks
were in operation under Orange County Permits prior to annexation to the
City of Anaheim.
Councilman Schutte felt that 30 days would be ample time to allow
for vacationing tenants, and should an occasion arrive where more time was
desired, they could move their trailers to a mobii-home park with travel-
trailer facilities.
RESOLUTION NOo ~4R=.149: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-149, amending Resolution No. 7006
removing the time limitation of Conditional Use Permit No. 121;~allowin~ the
maximum trailer size be as prescribed by the State Permit, and limiting the
duration of stay for trailers to 90 days.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING RESOLU-
TION NO. 7006 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 121.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons
Schutte
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-149 duly passed and adopted.
7580
City Hall, Anaheim. c~%fQrnia ~..COUNCIL ~IN~T. ES - March %0. 1964. 1:30
'RESOLUTiON NO. 64R-150: The City Attorney submitted proposedcontr~ct for
architectural services for City Convention Facility.
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-150 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
E~PLOY~ENT OF ADRIAN WILSON AND ASSOCIATES TO RENDER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENTION CENTER BUILDING IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll call vote~
AYES~ COUNCIL~EN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCIL~EN~ None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-150 duly passed and adopted,
~ESeLU~ION .~0. 64R-151: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-151 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING SERVICE
STATION MINIMUM SITE DEVELOPNMNT SIANDARDS.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-151 duly passed and adopted,
PUB~IQ HEAR.~NG, PROPOSED .A~END~ENT TO IIT~E .18 - M-t., LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE~
Public hearing before the City Council was scheduled, pursuant to City
Planning Resolution No. 1031, Series 1963-64, recommending.an amendment
to Title 18, Section 18.52 of the Anaheim N~nicipal Code, to read as follows~
"18.52.060(2) (a)~ An open setback area extending for the full width ot the
subject property shall be provided along those properties in all Anaheim
industrial areas which abut upon an arterial highway as designed on the
Circulation Element of the General Plan - "Arterial Streets and Highways"
as adopted and as amended from time to time. Said setback area shall be
a minimum of fifty (50) feet in depth for a~.l, majo~ prigary an.d §eqondary'.-
h. lqhwaM~, ~n~ twflnty-five (25.)..f.eet for all col~eq.$.q~ streets, measured
from the planned highway right-of-way line as designated on the Circulation
Element of the General Plan "Highway Rights-of-Way". ~.
"18.52,060(2)(b), The front twenty (20) feet of said fifty (50)i feet setback
a.X~ .and all of the twenty,five (25) f.ee$ 99tbas~ area sNall be landscaped
with lawn, trees, shru~s or other plant materials and shall be permanently
maintained in a neat and orderly manner as a condition to use. Fountains,
ponds, sculpture, planters, walkways and decorative screen type walls,
thirty (30) inches or less in height, where an integral part of a land-
scaping scheme comprised primarily of plant materials, are permitted,
Entrance and exit drives and walks may be provided into parking areas.
Said drives shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in width for each curb opening"~
"18.52.060(2)(c): The rear thirty (30) feet of said fifty (50) foot set-
back area may be used for employee or customer parking but where it is
not so utilized, the entire fifty (50) feet shall be landscaped and
maintained as provided in (b) above."
Mayor Coons asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or
against the proposed amendmenfs, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed.
7581
CitY Hall~,lAnaheim, Cal.ilforQia ~ ,co.u~.QIL ~INUiTESI - Ma~Gh ilO, 19641,I 1530
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the City Attorney's Office was instructed to prepare an amendment to
Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the City Pl&n-
ning Commission.
SIGN ~£Qu~$!.I Application submitted by Central Baptist Church, requesting
permission to erect a non=conforming sign at 229 North Magnolia Avenue,
was reviewed by the City Council together with plans and reports from
the Building and Planning Departments.
Associate Planner, Robert Mickelson, referred to Conditional
Use Permit No. 522 9ranting use of subject property for a church and
school, and the Plot Plan approved under said conditional use permit
shows an access drive at the southerly end of the property, were the
requested sign is proposed to be placed.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman
Chandler, said sign permit was granted as requested, with the exception
thal the sign is to be located in one of the landscaped areas shown on
the apprpved Plot Plan for Conditional Use Permit No. 522. MOTION
CARRIED.
SIGN PER.MIT: Application submitted by Lee~s Furniture, requesting permissio~
to attach an 8 foot by 12 foot sign to existing Broadway Village Shopping
Center sign at 641 North Euclid Street (30 square foot indentification
sign allowable), was reviewed by the City Council together with photo
of the large integrated sign, superimposed with sketch of said proposed
addition, and reports from the Building and Planning Departments. '
The City Clerk submitted elevation plans for said sign, re-
ceived at opeh meeting.
Nlr. Frank Mercado, President, G. M. Neon Corporation, advised
that the requested sign will. be attached to the existing pylons for the
integrated shopping center sign, and that permission has been obtained
from the owner of the property to attach the additional sign.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
said sign permit was granted as requested. Councilman Chandler abstained
from voting on this issue. 'NK)TION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUESt: Applications submitted by Columbia Outdoor Advertising, requesting
permission to erect three temporary directional signs at 2565 West Lincoln
Avenue, 2626 West Lincoln Avenue, and 2578 West Crescent Avenue, were reviewed
by the City Council together with plans and reports from the Building and
Planning Departments~
In answer to Mayor Coons~ question, a representative of the
'Applicant advised that the two signs proposed for Lincoln AYenue were tO
be 10 by 20 feet, and the third sign to be located on Crescent Avenue
would be 8 by 12 feet, double faced sign.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
said sign permits were granted for a period of six months, subject to the
posting of a $100 bond for each sign to guarantee removal thereof at the
expiration of the time limit. MOTION CARRIfD.
RE,QU~T - QLARIFICATION OF PROPQSED ORDINANQE RELATING TO P~WN BRQK~RS AND
SF~ONp-HAND DEALERS~ Communication dated February 26, 196~, from Chudacoff
& Margulis Advertising, Inc., was submitted requesting permission to operate
a Gift Exchange service in the City of Anaheim. , '~
b~kg~und.of his gif~ exchange business, which ha~ b~en in operation in
LoS Angeles for the past s~ven yea~s, He ~alled ~tt~ntion to th~ p~oblem
7582
C~tv Hall. Anaheim. California = COUNCIL MINUTES - March
which often occurs when people attempt to exchange gifts through merchants,
and advised that the service which is offered by the gift ~exchange is' to ex-
change gifts, with a service charge based on actual value of goods exchanged;
further, he noted that 90 percent of their business is conducted with newly-
weds exchanging duplicate gifts.
Mr. Margulis further advised that according to information
received from Captain Miller of the Anaheim Police Department, the
operation of the type of business described would be governed by the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to second=hand dealers and pawn brokers,
although his store handles all new merchandise on an exchange basis
only, and that all merchandise would have to be recorded and held for
a 30 day period. He submitted for Council review records of their
seven year operation in Los Angeles, noting only one or two items where serial
numbers were necessarily recorded, and explained why it would not be
feasible for this type of business to hold merchandise for 30 days. The
only items with which this service deal%which require recordation of serial
numbers are radios and clock=radios, as they do exchange guns, bicycles, :
Jewelry, etc., and Mr. Margulis advised that they have never had a stolen
item in the store. Also displayed were two typical gift items to illus-
trate type of goods commonly dealt with.
Mr. Geisler expIained the reasons for the 30 day holding period
which would be imposed under the proposed ordinance relating to goods
received and sold by pawn brokers and second=hand dealers; however certain
exceptions would be included such as used automobiles and furniture taken
as trade-in and other items which might be taken in trade for merchandise.
Referring to a report from Captain Miller, Mr. Geisler noted that no
difference was found in the proposed gift exchange operation from other
businesses receiving merchandise from the public, but a possible solution
might be to have a five day holding period on items received with a re-
quirement that any goods which appeared suspicious be held to the 30 day
holding period.
In answer to Councilman Dutton"s question, Mr. Margulis advised
that he holds a copyright on the name gift exchange, and on the format of
his business operation. He further explained the records kept on every
item received, including identification information, and noted their
success wifh the Los Angeles Police Department in being exempt from the
30 day holding period.
At the conclusion of Council discussion it was suggested
that Mr. Margulis meet with the City Attorney, Chief of Police and
Captain Miller to work out a possible provision that might be included~
in the proposed ordinance to cover this activity.
RECLASSIFIQAT~ON NO~ 5~-60=28: Request of Henry J. Fuchs, on behalf of White
Front Home Improvement Center, for permission to establish a Home Im-
provement Center for display of aluminum patio roofs, aluminum carports,
wrought iron and tubular patio furniture, and aluminum glass products
for the home, to be located within the structure of the White Front
Store formerly occupied by the produce center, was submitted and re-
viewed by the City Council together with photographs illustrating type
.of displays and the proposed location thereof.
Mr. Henry Fuchs, Operator of the existing Home Improvement Center
at the White Front Store in Covina, advised that he has authority to place
such a facility in all White Front Stores; that they deal in all new mer-
chandise, do their own installations meeting the requirements of the Bull-
ing Code, and that they would also display samples of their room remodeling
service. Further, any cartons or other debris would he removed immediately
to the existing store facilities for storage of trash.
Mr. Roy Stonaker, of the Home Improvement Center, reported that
the existing 4,000 square foot warehouse in Covina, which is separate from
the store itself, will he the central location from which merchandise will
he shipped to their various locations.
7583
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 10~ 1~64~ 1;30' P.M..
In answer to Councilman Chandler"s question, Ntr. Fuchs advised
that the proposed location will not be enclosed except by a 5 foot chain
link fence, allowing the attractive merchandise to be visible.
Council discussion was held, and it was considered that the
requested use was an improvement over the former use of this area.
No further action was taken by the City Council.
FINAL MAP$~ TRACTS NOS. 5267~ 5268, 5269, and 5270 (RECLASSIFICATION NO.
63~64-17.); Developer, Manco Development Company, tracts located as follows;
Tract No. 5~67: Located on the east side of Acacia Street, 1196 feet
south of Orangethorpe Avenue, and contains 10 proposed R-3 lots, and
lots 2A, 3A, 4A (1 foot lots for block wall construction), 7A, 8A, 9A,
(for garage units).
Tract No. ~268: Located 180 feet east of Acacia Street, 1211 feet
south of Orangethorpe Avenue, and contains 9 proposed R-3 lo/s, and
lots lA, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A and 6A (1 foot lots for block wall construction).
Tra.ct No. 5269; Located on the north side of the Riverside Freeway,
1546 feet south of Orangethorpe Avenue, and contains 12 proposed R-3
lots, and lots 6A, 7A, 8A, 9A, and lots 6B, lOB, and llB ("B" lots
are 1 foot lots for block wall construction; "A" lots are for garage
units).
Iract No. 5270: Located on the north side of the Riverside Freeway,
340 feet east of Acacia Street, and contains 9 proposed R-3 lots,
and lots 4A, SA, 6A, 7A, 8A and 9A (i foot lots for block wall
construction).
The City Engineer reported that said Final Maps conform sub-
stantially with the Tentative Maps previously amended and approved; that
required fees have been paid on Tract No. 5267 and bond has been posted
and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval. He referred to a letter
signed by Loran D~ Covington, President, Manco Development Co., stipulating
that the improvement plan for Tract No. 5267 shall he processed in the
normal manner with the checking fees being paid prior to approval of the
street impro:vement plans, and that no improvement plans for Tracts Nos. 5268,
5269 and 5270 will be approved until the applicable fees are paid and improve-
ment bond posted and approved.
~lr. Maddox further advised that after discussing the matter with
the City Attorney's Office, it is recommended that all four final maps be approv-
ed at this time, however signed improvement plans for Tracts Nos. 5268, 5269
and 5270, will be withheld pending posting and approval of improvement bonds
for each tract, and payment of all applicable fees in order to comply with con-
dition of Reclassification No. 63=64-17, and finalize said reclassification.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte
moved Final Maps, Tracts Nos. 5267, 5268, 5269 and 5270, be approved subject
to and in accordance with letter from 3ames P. Maddox~ dated December 20, 1963,
approved December 23, 1963, by Loran D. Covington, President of Man¢o Develop-
ment Co. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. Io this motion Councilman
Krein voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
TRACT NOv 4717 = POWHATAN STREET: Excerpt from the minutes from the City Planning
Commission meeting held February 3, 1964, recommending correction be made to
the spelling of Powhaten Street to "Powhatan", was submitted (Tract No. 4717,
located on the west side of Sunkist Street, north of South Street).
Councilman Schutte moved said recommendation be accepted, and the
Public Works Department be instructed to change street signing accordingly.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
7584
Oity H~i1, Apahgim, California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES.- March 10, 1~64,.1:.30 .P,M...
CITY p~ANN.ING CQN~I~SION ITE~S~ Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held February 17, 1964, pertaining to the following
applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration.
VARIANCE NO, 1.619~ Submitted by Albert V. Gastelum, requesting waiver of
R'I minimum lot width and area, R-1 property with frontages on the west
side of Liberty Lane, east side of Rosemont Street, and located approximate-
ly 240 feet north of La Palma Avenue (1019 Liberty Lane).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1063,
Series 1963-64, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
V~R. IAN~E NO. 1620: Submitted by Lusk Corporation, requesting waiver of
required front yard setback, R-1 property bounded on the west by the New-
port Freeway, and on the north and east by the Nohl Canyon Road (Tract
No. 4689).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to ReSolution No. 1064,
Series 1963-64, granted said variance, subject to developments substan-
tially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City
of Anaheim, marked 5xhibits 1, 2, & 3.
YARIANG£ NO., 1621: Submitted by Arion, Incorporated, requesting waiver
of required number of parking spaces, R-A property (C-1 pending) located
on the south side of Lincoln Avenue approximately 700 feet east of Broad-
view Street (1808 West Lincoln Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1065,
Series~ 1963,64, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
COND!!IONAL USE PERMIT NO, 537~ Submitted by James S. and Anna L. Morris,
requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waiver of
the required parking, R-A and C-1 property located on the south side of
Orange Avenue, 200 feet east of Brookhurst Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1071,
Series 1963-64, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 537.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and
no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and
variance applications.
PROpO$~p ,~.DN~NT TO TITLe. %8 - "WALK-UP R£STAURANT$": City Planning Resolu-
tion No. 1077, Series 1963~64, recommending an amendment to Title 18,
Section 18.04.030 of the Anaheim ~unicipal Code, by the addition of Section
18.04.030(b-12), "Walk-Up RestaUrants", was submitted and the City Clerk di-
rected to schedule said matter for public hearing before the City Council,
on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. NDTION CARRI£D.
PROPOS~j) 6~NDN~NT TO TITLE 18 - "C-O" COMN~RCIAL OFFICf ZONf: City Planning
Commission Resolution No. 1066, Series 1963-64, recommending that Title
18, Sections 18.38.020 and 18.38.040, "'C.O" Commercial Office 2one, of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, be amended, was directed to be scheduled
by the City Clerk for public hearing before the City Council, on motion
"' by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. ~OTION CARRIHD.
.TEN,AT, YE ~AP, ~RAQT NO, 523%~ RE. VISION NO, 35 Developer, S. V. Hunsaker and
Sons, tract located on the north side of Anaheim Road, and on the east
side of the Riverside Freeway, and contains 12 proposed R-3 lots (filed
in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64-5 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 449).
The City Planning Co~mission at their meeting held ~arch 2,
1964, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi-
sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form
approval.
7585
City Hall~ Aoaheim~ California - COUNCIL .MINUTES - March 10~ 1964~ 1:30
2.That Revision No. 3 Tentative Map of Tract No. 5231 is approved
subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 63-64-5.
3.That the alignment of Miraloma Avenue be approved by the State Division
of Highways.
4. That all access rights to Miraloma Avenue, shall be dedicated to the
City of Anaheim. The half street section for Miraloma Avenue shall be
thirty-four feet to the property line, curbs to be located twenty-four (24)
feet from centerline, no parking permitted with signs installed at
the developer"s expense.
5.That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be installed on the north
and south boundaries of subject property as proposed.-
6.That Tract No. 5501 shall be recorded and developed prior to Tract
No. 5231.
7.That Anaheim Road shall be recorded as Miraloma Avenue,
8. That landscaping and planted tr,,wells at approximately forty (40)
foot intervals shall be provided in the Miraloma Avenue parkway abut-
lng subject property~ that plans for treewells and landscaping therein
shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway
Maintenance, and that upon the installation and acceptance of same,
the maintenance of the landscaping will be handled by the City of
Anaheim.
Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5231,.
Revision No. 3, be approved subject to the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP] TRACT NO. 5501: Developer, S. V. Hunsaker and Sons, tract
located on the north side of Anaheim Road, east of the Riverside Freeway,
and contains 16 proposed R-3 lots (Reclassification No. 63-64-5 and Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 449).
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 2,
1964, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:!
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5501 is granted
subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 63-64-5.
3. That the alignment and grade be approved by the State Division of
Highways.
4. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings, to Miraloma Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
The half street section for Miraloma Avenue shall be thirty-four (34)
feet to property line, curbs to be located twenty-four (24) feet from
centertine, no parking permitted with signs installed at the developer"s
expense.
5. That the drainage of the tract be designed with consideration of the
existing elevations of the culverts under the Riverside Freeway.
6. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be installed on the north, south,
and west boundaries of subject property, except at street and alley
openings.
That a strip of land one (1) foot wide be provided along the west tract
boundary and designated as Lot Nos.~l-A through 6-A.
That Iract No. 5501 shall be recorded and developed prior to or concur-
rently with Tract No. 5231. '
That Parcel A and B at the stub end of the street and alley be eliminated
from the tract map.
That landscaping and planted tr,,wells at approximately forty (40) foot
intervals shall be provided in the Anaheim Road parkway abutting subject
property; that plans for treewells and landscaping therein shall b9
submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance,
and that upon the installation and acceptance of same, the maintenance
of the landscaping will be handled by the City of Anaheim.
That Eastview Street be relocated approximately 240 feet to the east.
That Anaheim Road shall be recorded as Miraloma Avenue.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
7586
City Hall. Anaheim. California ~ COU1~..IL MINIF?ES . March 10,
Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5501,
be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. NDTION CARRIED.
TENIATIVE ~AP NOv .5510.~ Developer, Highland Development Incorporated, tract
located on the west side of Sunkist Street, approximately 380 feet north
of South Street and contains 8 R-1 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 2, 1964,
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings, to Sunkist Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim~
That in accordance with City Council policy a six foot masonry wall
shall be constructed on the east property line separating Lot Nos.
1 and 8 and the arterial highway, except that corner Lot Nos. 1 and 8
shall be stepped down to a height of twenty-four inches in the front,
one-half of said setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall
be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways
right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping
including irrigation facilities shall be installed in the uncemented
portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall,
plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the ap-
proval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, Following installa-
tion and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility
fdr maintenance-hr said landscaping.
Ntt. Maddox reported that the Interdepartmental Committee re-
commended an additional condition that Street "A" he 60 feet in width,
However the City Planning Commission deleted said condition and expressed
an opinion that they would he in favor of permitting a 54 foot strip
width, since Street "A" will serve only 8 lots. He submitted a cross sec-
tion street plan which was reviewed at the Council Table, and recommended
that the 60 foot condition he imposed to allow a wider parkway area, neces-
sary for the parkway trees; further, he advised that the 60 foot width would
impose no hardship or loss in number of lots to the developer.
Ntt. Roberts Hukee, of Jennings, Halderman and Hood, Engineers
of Tract No. 5510, was of the opinion that prospective purchasers of
homes in the tract would prefer an extra three feet in their rear yards
rather than the extra area in the parkways, and requested that the 54
foot width b~ allowed, thereby creating larger lots.
At the conclusion of Council discussion and on the recommenda-
tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative
Map, Tract No. 5510, he approved, subject to the recommendations of the
City Planning Commission, and further subject to the addition of a further
condition to he numbered (4), as follows: "That Street "A" shall he sixty
(60) feet in width. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED.
~AP. TRACT NO. 5444.: Developer, L. G. S. Corporation, tract located
on the northeast corner of Wilshire Street and Lincoln Avenue, and contains 1
proposed C-1 and 1 proposed R-3 (filed in conjunction with Reclassification
No. 63-64-80 and Conditional Use Permit No. 470).
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 2,
1964, recommended that further study he made hy the Traffic Engineer
regarding the possible traffic hazard that may he created at the northeast
corner of Wilshire Street and Lincoln Avenue prior to the City Council's
final decision on subject tract, and approved Tentative Map, Tract No.
5444, subject to the following condition:
That the parkway dedication along Wilshire Street and Lincoln Avenue
be a minimum of ten feet from the ultimate location of the curbs.
7587
City Ha~l, Anaheim~ California = COUNCIL MINU/E.S - March 10, 1964,'1:30 P.M.
Nit. Maddox read memorandum from Ed Granzow, Traffic Engineer,
stating that the traffic situation at Lincoln Avenue and Wilshire Street
has been reanalvzed and in their opinion the proposed development and
subject streets are as well oriented as possible to provide adequate
traffic service in this' area.
Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5444 be
approved, subject to the City Planning Commission Condition No. 1 per-
taining to parkway dedication. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
The City Clerk was instructed to place a copy of memorandum
from the Traffic Engineer in the file on Tract No. 5444.
RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a 15 minute recess. Coumilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:30 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS:' Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
City Council being present.
RECLASSIFICA/ION NO. 63=64=40: Communication dated March 4, 1964, from
Richard L. Tom, Architect representing property owner, for permission to
post a two year bond in lieu of construction of a six foot masonry wall.
along the north property line, as contained in Item No. 7, Resolution
No. 63R=879, and further noting that it was their understanding property
adjacent to the north is currently pending reclassification to the C-1
and R-3 Zones (58=59=99), was read in full by the City Clerk.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
said request to post two year bond in lieu of masonry wall construction
was granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE = PORTABLE SHOW WAGON (SOROPTIMIST CLUB OF ANAHEIM): Communication
dated March 10, 1964, from Peggy 3ohnson, President, Soroptimists Inter-
national of Anaheim, Incorporated, was read by the Assistant City Manager~
wherein commitment was made by said organization to the obligations out-
lined in their letter of February 10~ 1964, and as modified in their ad-
ditional communication dated March 3, 1964; and further requesting that
purchase of the "~$ho~ Wagon~ be expedited for early enjoyment by the
community.
Memorandum from John J. Collier, Park and Recreation Director,
was submitted for Council information, reporting that the total cost of
the Wenger Show Wagon, Model No. 6332 BaH, is $12,738.00, including sales
tax, delivery cost and necessary optional equipment; and that subtracting
the Soroptimist Club's first payment in the amount of $860.00, a balance
of $11,878.00 from City funds would be necessary to order completion and
delivery of the portable unit.
IRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman
Chandler moved that transfer of funds in the amount of $11,878.00 be authorized
from the Council Contingency Fund to consumate purchase of the Wenger Show
Wagon; that it be the finding of the City Council that there is only on~
supplier of said equipment, and that purchase from the sole supplier be
authorized in the total amount of $12,738.00 including optional equipment.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
GORR~SPONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandlers
a. L. H. Moulton, regarding R-3 zoning.
b. Feather River Project Association Press Release, with Fact Sheet on the
revised Pacific Southwest Water Plan prepared by U. S. Department of
Interior with map attached. Also, a table from the report which was
submitted to Congress.
c. Feather River Project Association Agenda~ meeting scheduled March 6~ 1964..
d. Minutes of the Traffic and Transportation Study of the Northern Orange
County Transportation Committee.
MOTION CARRIED.
7588 '
Ctt~ Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 1.0~ 1964
DEEDS OF ~A~.NT~ Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 64R-152 to
64R-157, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUte!ON NO. 64R-152: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE PURPOSES. (Santa Ana Valley
Irrigation Company)
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-153: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASENENT FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES. (Celestial Homes,
Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-154: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEI~ ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEN~NT FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES. (Celestial Homes
Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-155: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEI~ ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASENENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING
SANITARY SEWER, AND FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION. (Newport Construction Co.)
RESOLUTION .NO. 64R-156~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(S. A. Melugin and Jessie P. Melugin.)
RE~OLUTION NO, ~4.R=157~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEI~ ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(~osaburo and Haru Nakamura)
Roll call vote:
AYeS: COUNC I L~N:
NOES: COUNC I L~N:
ABSENT: COUNC IL~N:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-152 to 64R-157, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 197~! Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1975 for final
reading,
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~t~NDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE BY A~ENDING CHAPTER 18.40, SECTION18.~O.OIO: CHAPTER
18,48, SECTION 18.48.010, PARAGRAPH (2)-(a); AND CHAPTER 18.64, SECTION
18.6~.020, PARAGRAPH (3) THEREOF, AND BY DELETING THEREFROM ITEM (24),
SECTION 18.48.010, CHAPTER 18.48. (C-1 Zone = Automobile Service Stations)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1975
and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. NDTION UNANINDUSLY CARRIED.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNC ILM~N ~
NOES: COUNC ILM~N:
ABSENT: COUNC ILNMN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
None
None
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1975 duly passed and adopted.
7589
City Hail, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March l0t 1964~ 1:30
OR~IN .ANCE NO. 1976: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1976 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITI~ 18 OF TH~ ANAHEI~
~UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-57 - R-3).
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1976
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. NDTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILN~N:
Dut%on, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
None
None
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1976 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1977: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1977 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62~63-81 ~ R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1977
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. ~OTION UNANINDUSLY CARRIED.
Roll dali vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
None
None
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1977 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NQ. 1978: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1978 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-67 - C-2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1978
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1975~ Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1979 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-40 - C-2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1979
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RIGHTS - AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY: Memorandum from Douglas.
Ogden, Finance Director, advising receipt of 180 rights of American
Telephone and Telegraph stock and recommending sale thereof was sub-
mitted.
7590
Hall, A~ahe.~m, CalSfornia = COUNCIL MINUTES - March 10~ 1~64~ .%~$0
On the recommendations of Mr. Ogden and the Assistant City
Manager, Councilman Krein moved that the Director of Finance be autho-
rized to sell 180 rights of American Telephone and Telegraph Company
stock. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ALCOHOLIC BE~r~RAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONSl
The following Alcoholic Beverage
License Applications were presented by the Assistant-City Manager to
the City Council for their information:
Application submitted by Henry A. Boney, et al, for
Original Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, for the Speedee
Mart, 801 South Euclid Avenue (C-1 Zone).
(b)
Application submitted by Walter Joseph Jr. and Mildred
Sylvia Stiles, for Person To Person Transfer Of On-Sale
Beer License for The Bavarian Inn, 2820 West Ball Road
(C-1Zone~ Conditional Use Permit No. 360).
(c)
Affidavit in support for Alcoholic Beverage License, submitted
by Robert Gene Golbach, for the Charter House of Southern
California, Inco, 1700 South Harbor Boulevard (R-A Zone -
Conditional Use Permit No. 186 and Variance No. 1021)
No Council action was taken on said applications and affidavit
in support.
RECLASSIFICATIONNO. 59-60~115 - STATUS. NUISANCE ABATE~ENT~
Regarding
chapter XI Bankruptcy Proceedings pertaining to the property described
in Reclassification No. 59-60-115, located at the northeast corner
of Chapman Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, the City Attorney reported
that the Referee in said propeedings has authorized the City of Anaheim
to abate weeds and rank growth on subject property, and that any
expenditures incurred by the City would be approved for payment
upon sale of the property which is expected to be within the next
30 to 60 days.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Schutte, necessary expenditure to abate said nuisance was autho-
rized, and claim directed to be filed against said property in the
amount of expenditure incurred by the City of Anaheim. MOTION CARRIED.
R~SO~UT~ON NQ, ~R-~58: On the recommendations of the Director of Public
Utilities, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6~R-158 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
:: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREE~JENT TO BE N~DE AND ENTER-
ED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE OF CALI-
FORNIA, DEPARTN~NT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, DESIGN-
ATED AS UTILITIES AGREE~RNT NO. 7Ut-2929, FOR THE RELOCATION OF
CERTAIN UTILITY FA£ILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY. (VII-O~a-174-Ana)
Roll call vote:
AY~S~ COUNCIL~N:
NO~, COUNC!L~N~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dut~en, Chandler, $chu~,'_.~_~in ~nd Coen~
Non~
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-158 duly passed and
adopted.
7591
City Ha. ll~ Anaheim~ California - QOUNCIL MINUTES - Marc
QITy OF ~OS, T~ MESA RESOLUTION - QRANGE COUNTY ,T~LEPHON~,D,IR~CTORIES, Mayor
Coons briefed correspondence received from the Mayor of the City of
Costa Mesa including Costa Mesa City Council's Resolution No. 64R-20,
entitleds
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA PROTESTING
THE BREAKING OF THE ORANGE COUNTY DIRECTORY OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE
COMPANY INTO FIVE SECTIONS".
Discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney,
and at the conclusion thereof, it was directed that a letter be written
to the City of Costa Mesa advising that, the Anaheim City Councilman_.
of the opinion that this was a matter outside their provi~ce...~ef~/,
municipal government and directly Concerns the Public Utilities Commission
acting for the people, and the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company.
ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Coons announced that Judge Roger A, Pfaff will speak
at the Anaheim Union High School March 11, 1964, on "delinquency problems"
Councilman .Krein was delegated /o represent-the Anaheim City Council at ~
said meeting.
RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved to recess to 7s00 P.M. Councilman Dutton ~
seconded /he motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:15 P.M.). ~.
F
AFTER REQES$I Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
PRESENTs
ABSENT:
PRESENT~
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Kretn and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGERs Robert Davis.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEERs James P. Maddox.
ASSOCIATE PLANNERs Robert Mickelson.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER~ Ronald J. Grudzinski.
~ Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
INTRODUQ. IIQN] -Mayor Coons acknowledged the presence of members of the Student
Council, Fremont Junior High School, who were in attendance for the purpose
of observing a City Council meeting.
RECLASSIFICAT!.ON .NO.. 63~64~68 AND VARIANCE NQ. 1616: Submitted by Keystone Savings
and Loan Association and Anaheim Investment Company, requesting a change of
zone from R-1 and C~l to C-0; waiver of required 10 foot building setback and
structural height limitation to permit expansion of the Keystone Savings & Loan
Building to three stories. Property briefly described as having frontages
on the east side of Fairhaven Street, west side of Euclid Street, and south
side of Crescent Avenue (555 and 551 North Euclid Street - 530, 536, 540,
550 and 554 Fairhaven Street).
City Planning Commission recommended approval of said reClassifica-
tion and granted Variance No. 1616 subject to conditions.
Public Hearing was held by the City Council February 11, 1964,
at which time said hearing was closed and action of the City Council tabled
to this date for further study and report of the Planning Department, concern-
ing the possibility of reclassifying the entire block from Crescent Avenue to
Westmont Street and Euclid Street to Fairhaven Street.
Mr. Mickelson referred to the map posted on the east wall of the
Council Chamber, noting the location of subject property and the study area.
Mr. Grudzinski reported that an area development plan was considered
as a study by the City .Planning Commission, March 2, 1964, at which time the
followi~ ~in~gs w~r~ noted:
7592
Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March .~.Q., 1964, 1;.~..0 p,M,
A commercial extension along the Euclid Street frontage at this
point, was within the intent of the regional shopping symbol de-
signated on the General Plan.
The intrusion of commercial use into the residential area west of the
Euclid Street frontage would create an incompatible land use situation
for the following reasons~
a. Possible request for commercial use of those properties on the
east side of Fairhaven Street.
b. The possibility of creeping commercial use westerly of the east
side of Fairhaven Street.
c. Increased commercial traffic on Fairhaven and Westmont Streets.
He reported the conclusion was that commercial arowth._into this
fine residential area should be retarded if possible. Also, that-certain.,~-
restrictions be developed to safeguard the residential amenities of the
property west of Fairhaven Street.
Mr. Grudzinski further reported that the City Planning Commission
recommended the following:
That the properties within the area bounded by Crescent Avenue, Euclid
Street, Westmont and Fairhaven Streets he considered for commercial-
potential.
2.
That the properties on the east side of Fairhaven Street be developed
in coordination with properties on the west side of Euclid Street.
For the protection of residential properties on the west side of
Fairhaven Street, that all vehicular access along Fairhaven Street
he dedicated to the City.
That a masonry wall be constructed to further restrict pedestrian
and vehicular movement into the residential areas that the block
wall be constructed 3 feet east of the sidewalk on Fairhaven Street,
and the area between the sidewalk and wall be landscaped the entire
length.
That a block wall be constructed along Crescent Street, and reduced
in height to 36 inches within 15 feet of the south right-of-way line
of Crescent Avenue.
That there be established a 10 foot building setback on the Crescent
Avenue and Euclid Street frontage.
That there be established a 5 foot building setback on the Westmont
and Fairhaven Streets frontage.
Buildings within 150 feet of any single-family zone, measured from
the east property line of Fairhaven Street, shall not exceed one
half of the distance from said building, or structure, to the zone
boundary.
Mr. Grudzinski further reported that the City Planning Commission
took no position as to a recommended zone, but did considered if the area
is to be developed commercially, Development Plan~ No. 3 would be a feasi-
ble solution for development of the area. Further the City Planning Com-
mission was of the opinion that each parcel of property should be considered
on its own merits.
Discussion was held as to whether the distance of measurement
relative to height of structures was from the east side or the west side
of Fairhaven Street.
Councilman Dutton asked if any thought was given to the possibility
of the entire triangle becoming commercial.
7593
CitY Ha%l.,..An.~.heim~ C.a~i.forn.%a o COUNCIL MINUTES.-.March.
Nit. Grudzinski replied that this possibility was considered,
however it was felt that the residential amenities of the area should' be
preserved as indicated on the General Plan; that a General Plan Amendment
Study had not been directed.
gESOLUIION NO. 64R-159~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-159
authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as re-
quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
eliminating therefrom Condition No. 2.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DET£RMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM N~JNICIPAL COD£ RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-68 - C-O)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-160z Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-160
granting Variance No. 1616 subject to the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAH£IM GRANTING
VARIANCE NO. 1616.
Nit. Dannemeyer asked if the City Council would like to hear
additional testimony from each side.
Mayor Coons questioned the Council and announced that it appeared
that the City Council considered sufficient testimony had been given.
MaYor Coons thereupon called for roll call on the foregoing
resolutions.
Roll call, Resolution No. 64R-159:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSEN/: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons
Schutte
None
Roll call, Resolution No. 64R-160:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCIL~N:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons
Schutte
None
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-159 and 64R-160 duly
passed and adopted.
PUBLIC, HEARING = CQ.NDIIIONAL .USE PER~I.T NO...Q38: Submitted by Forest Lawn
Ceme'tery Association~ requesting permission to establish on-sale of beer
in conjunction with a restaurant, and waiver of the required six-foot solid
fence or wall~ property briefly described as located on the south side of
Lincoln Avenue approximately 1,140 feet east of State College Boulevard~
and presently zoned C=i.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1072,
Series 1963-64, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 538. Appeal from action
taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Nit. Harold Morrison~ on
behalf of Forest Lawn Cemetery Association.
The following letters of protest received in the office of the
City Clerk, were submitted and read in full:
Sunkist PTA (N[rs..Don Cram)
Horace Mann PTA (Nits. F. Howard Olsen)
R. D. Wi!~o~ 2312 Paradise Road.
~ui~n PTA (N~s, Ralph Sn~gas)
7594
City H~i,. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Marqb 10, 1964. 1:30 P.M.
~r. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and re-
ported the findings of the City Planning Commission, resulting in denial
of said Conditional Use Permit.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
~r. Austin Eddy, representing Forest Lawn Cemetery Association,
addressed the Council advising that it was unusual for their company to
appeal something of this kind because they were in sympathy with the
objectives of the Planning Department, City Planning Commission, and
with the residents of the area. That the success of the shopping center
depends upon the goodwill of the residents in the area, but in their
opinion, the action of the City Planning Commission in denying said
application, was based on some error and the facts of the matter warranted
re-examination.
Attention was called to the Plot Plan of the shopping center,
and the adjoining 316 foot wide presently undeveloped area on which a
Branch Library is proposed.
Mr. Eddy related their experiences in leasing stores in the
shopping center, and reported that there has been a vacancy in the center
since 3anuary of 1959; that approximately 17 applications have been re-
ceived for the vacant store for a beer-bar, and they do not want a beer-
bar in the Hast Anaheim Shopping Center, but do want a good specialty
restaurant such as the one proposed.
He further advised that they attempted to obtain businesses that
were compatible and not competitive with existing businesses in east Anaheim,
and thereupon noted the existing eating establishments in the area.
~r. Eddy advised that the restaurant proposed is "Blinky's Pizza"
and that a similar restaurant is in operation on South Euclid Street in the
City of Fullerton. He further advised that the proposed lessors were only
interested in tbis location if they can obtain a beer license as the sale
of beer was desirable with the sale of pizza.
The location of Michael's Market, presently under construction,
and the proposed restaurant to be constructed on the balance of the parcel
of property (50 feet) was noted.
Mr. Eddy stated that the restaurant area would be 5,220 square
feet, a size much too large for the normal "beer parlor" and a size that
will accommodate 150 people in the dining room and be truly a restaurant
operation. Further, the other business to occupy this building, will be
a barber shop.
An architectural rendering of the front elevaiion of the proposed
restaurant and barber shop was submitted illustrating a "Gay 90's" motif.
The floor plan of the proposed restaurant was presented and explained.
Mr. Eddy reported that according to the audited statements of
the restaurant for 1963, of their total sales, 69 percent was derived from
the sale of food and 31 percent was derived from the sale of beer. This
would indicate that the major function was the sale of food and that it
would not be a beer-parlor or a beer-bar in the uncomplimentary sense
of the word. Further, the men that operate this business are jealous df
their reputation and their license, and have had no problems either wi~h
the Police or the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
Regarding the proposed library site, Mr. Eddy reported that the
City of Anaheim has condemned an unspecified acre of the adjoining.parcel
of property.
Mr. Eddy then presented a suggested plot plan prepared by Economics
Research Associates, indicating their recommended development on the ad-
jacent 7 acre parcel. Said Plan indicated the library site to be on the
eastern side of ~h~ 316 foot froDt footage with a medical-office building
7595
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COL~.IL MINUTES - March 10~ 1964, 1:30 P~M.
in between the library site and restaurant with parkina on three sides of the
professional building. He further stated that according 'to this plan
the library site could occupy less than one acre having access'to a
common parking area. He noted that this plan however, would require
obtaining a C-O Zone on the front portion of the property with possibly
multiple family zoning at the rear.
Ntt. Eddy stated that if these plans materialize and zoning is
obtained, there would be quite a buffer between the restaurant and the
library, not that he felt that the restaurant would be harmfullto the
library, but was noting that the location would be quite removed.
He further reported that their company was ready to proceed
with negotiations with the City on the library site, and have never
shown any signs of being opposed to having the library. In fact, the
independent survey made by Economics Research Associates indicates
the library is a very real part of their plans.
Mrs. Howard Stanton, 1498 East Birch Street, advised that
they have been residents of this area for eleven years, during which
time they have waited for a library in the East Anaheim area.
She called attention to the number of stores presently selling
liquor in the area, and objected to any additional establishments. Mrs;
Stanton thereupon requested the application be denied, and that the vote
of the City Council be such that the proposed library will become a
reality.
Mr. David Sackett, Director of East Anaheim Merchants Assoc-
iation, representing approximately twenty-one firms with an investment
of over three million dollars, addressed the City Council advising that
their association has considered subject application and all thoroughly
approve of the proposed restaurant°
Mr. Sackett further advised that they would be opposed to
a beer-bar as they were approximately one year ago, but in their ~
opinion, this would not be a beer=bar, it would be strictly a restaurant
and they would no more oppose it than they would the Gourmet Restaurant
or any of the other high grade restaurants in this area.
Mrs. Mary Nicolai, 509 Whittier Street, submitted and read letters
of protest filed by Sycamore 3unior High School PTA and Anaheim Sunkist Civic
Association.
~ Mrs. Nicolai, with the aid of a chart, noted the location of the
proposed restaurant and library site and felt that an enlargement of the
proposed medical center would be preferable.
In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Geisler reported
on the Business and Professional Code as it relates to alcoholic beverage
applications, and advised that grounds for denial may be on the basis of
close proximity to a church or hospital, and an application may be denied
if located within 600 feet proximity of a children's playground or school,
however, he knew of no mention of libraries in the Alcoholic Beverage Code
section.
Ntr. R. J. Hart, 530 Priscilla Way, Chairman of the Zoning Committee,
East Anaheim Home Owners Association, reported he represented approximately
300 home owners who share a common interest in the application. The issue
seems to be that if on-sale beer is allowed in the pizza parlor, the proposed
library site for the East Anaheim area will be eliminated as a choice. He
advised that a future library on this site would serve all of the schools in
the area and was very much needed.
Mr. Hart noted that the General Plan projects the area to be
residential in character, and further advised that the granting of subject
application would establish a precedent.
7596
Hall. Anaheim. California ~.COUNCIL MINUTES. m ~arch 10, 1964, ~:30_P.~,
At the request of Councilman Chandler, Ntt. Hart further elaborated
on the statement made that the granting of the application would eliminate
the library site. He referred to a letter written by Nit. Fred Sorsabal,
Administrative Assistant, advising that initial steps of condemnation had
been taken by the City of Anaheim to acquire the one acre Site for an fast
Anaheim Library, and that this was the only site under consideration and
there was no alternate site at the present time.
Councilman Chandler advised that the real issue before the
City Council was whether or not the two activities would be compatible,
that he knew of no plan to discontinue the CitY's aims for a library on
the site in question.
Mr. Hart further reported that a pizza parlor becomes a gather-
ing place for teen-agars and if there was a choice between the two activi-
ties, they would rather have the library instead of an on-sale beer stablishment.
Councilman Dutton related his experience taking his family to
Blinky's, stating he did not witness conditions as described by Nit. Hart.
Mr. David Scott, 526 South Dawn, addressed the Council re-
gistering opposition on behalf of the Thomas Jefferson PTA. He stated
it was their understanding that the proposed use would conflict with the
library interest. That their first concern was a possible loss of the
library, and secondly they objected to the sale of beer close to the
library.
Mrs. Robert Laflin, President of Abraham Lincoln PTA, addressed
the Council in opposition to the granting of the permit advising that
their chief concern was safety of their children, and was of the opinion
that the existing traffic problems would be increased. She further
advised that they were not opposed to a pizza parlor but were opposed
to restaurants that sell beer where.teen-agars may gather..
Mrs. Robert D. Wilson, 2312 Paradise Road, advised that their
home was in close proximity of the proposed restaurant, and although she
had no objections to the food or the design of the establishment, she
would be opposed to the proposed sign and flickering lights that would
be shining into their yard and home.
Mrs. Claudia Peters, 2640 Carnival, representing the Rio Vista
Home Owners Association, asked if the application was granted, what
guarantee would they have that the library would be established within
the adjacent seven acres. She further advised'that their maih concern
was whether the present library site would be retained and that the
library will be established on this site.
Mrs. Peters stated that if this use is approved, she personally
would like to see development of the restaurant~ the medical building
and the library at the same ttme~ and again advised that their main con-
cern was what guarantee they would have that the library would become a
reality.
Mayor Coons advised that the City Manager, Library Staff and
Library Board have made a rather exhausting survey of the East Anaheim area
and have recommended to the City Council a one acre site in this location.
The City Council has approved their recommendation and has authorized
condemnation of a one acre site on the seven acres adjacent to subject
property. Further, the City has the money to acquire the site but in-
asmuch as the bond issue needed to build the library was defeated in the
October Special Bond flection, it is felt there was no real urgency in
acquiring the site. Mayor Coons further advised that as far as he could
determine there has been no change in the requirements for a"libra~y'in
this area, nor has there been any change in the Council's opinion as to
the site location.
Mayor Coons read excerpts of the minutes of the Library Board
of Trustees meeting held February 17, 1964, noting that no action was
taken regarding the restaurant, or change in their opinion regarding the
proposed library site.
7597
q%t¥ .~all, Anaheim, C. aliforn~,a ~ CO..UNCI. L MINUT£$ -..March.lO., 1964
Councilman Chandler stated that the only way assurance could
be given at this time would be to purchase the site and take immediate
possession.
NL~s. Nicolai advised that she opposed the sale of beer at this
location, even if the City was presently the owner of the library site,
because of the possible undesirable type of people that mi9h± trequent
the library.
M~. Frederick Crisafi, Operator of Blinky"s Pizza Restaurant,
addressed the Council advising that they do not allow teen-agers in the
establishment after 10:00 P.M., and those eating in the restaurant are
asked to leave once they have eaten, and that no teen-acer is permitted
to come in just for soft drinks. Further, everyone who looks under
twenty-one years of age is thoroughly checked; that with an investment
of approximate $30,000.00 he would not take a chance on getting into
difficulty with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for a twenty-five
cent beer.
NL~. Crisafi advised that they operated a clean establishment
and if there was any reason that his restaurant could mean the loss of
the library, he would rather withdraw..He further advised ~hat he'was '
a family man himself and had two children, and further advise~ of the yputh
activities which he actively supports.
Mayor Coons announced that in his opinion sufficient testimony
had been received and thereupon declared the hearing closed.
Nit. Robert Davis reported that the City was faced with a pro-
blem in that the westerly side of the parcel of property immediately
adjacent to the proposed restaurant, was the site on which 5minent
Domain Proceedings have been filed.
Further discussion was held by the City Council, and the status
of the condemnation proceedings again noted.
~$OL~ION NO. 64R-161: Councilman K~ein offered Resolution No. 64R-161
granting Conditional Use Permit No. 538, with the reservation that if the
library is built there would be a buffer such as indicated by NL~. £ddy~
between the Library Site and the Pizza Restaurant, and further subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street
along Lincoln Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Lincoln Avenue, as re-
quired by the City £ngineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on fi~ in the office of the City ~nginee~ prior to final
building inspection.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Work%.prtor to
final building inspection.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of fifteen cents per front foot along Lincoln Avenue~ for tree
planting purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the building 'permit
is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever.
occurs first.
5. That Conditions 1 and 4 above mentioned shall be complied with within a
period of 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City
Council may grant.
6. That subject property shall be deweloped substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked £xhibits
Nos. 1~ 2 and 3.
7. That a 3 foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Lincoln Avenue
frontage and said landscaping maintained as indicated on £xhibit No. 1
on file with the City! that plans of said landscaping shall be submitted
to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance) and that
~a~d ~and~caping sha~l b~ insta~d prio~ to (ina~ building ~n~p~t~on.
7598
City H~ll, 6nah~im, California - C.OUNCIL.MINUTES - March hO,. 1~64.,..1:$0. P.M~
That all air~conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view from the abutting street°
Discussion was called for, and Councilman Chandler stated that
this action assumes that the friendly condemnation action will move to
the easterly one-half of that property, and requested a statement from
the applicant concerning this.
Ntt. Eddy advised that according to their plans, and the report
and survey of Economics Research Associates, the eastern portion of the
property is where they propose the library site. He related the steps that
must be accomplished before finalizing these plans, such as the required re-
zoning of the property etc., and further stated that as far as the easterly
location was concerned their plan would favor that location.
Roll call vote, Resolution No. 64R-161:
AYES: COUNCIIA~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILNa~N:
Dutton, Chandler and Krein
Schutte and Coons
None
Mayor Coons declared Resolution No. 64R-161 duly passed and adopted.
~ECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9500 P.M.)
~.~TER R£c£s~: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present°
PUB~IC..HEAR~NG~ RECLASSIFICATION' NO? ~2=63=1~.05 Request submitted bv Jeri Young
Garan to consider a variance to Condition No. ~ of Ordinance No. 1947,
adopted December 3, 1963, reclassifying subject property to the C-1 Zone,
said condition reading as follows:
"4. That signs, flags, banners and displays visible from State College
Boulevard and Sycamore Street shall be limited to one unlighted sign
of a maximum size of eight square feet."
Property located on the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and
Sycamore Street (1950 East Sycamore Street).
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the City Council.
Nit. Mike Garan submitted an elevation rendering of a proposed sign
for Council review, noting that in their opinion, a 30 square foot sign would
be suitable for the real estate business which they plan to establish on sub-
Ject property.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council,
either in support or opposition to the requested variance, there being no
response, declared the hearing closed.
OP~)INANCE .NO~ 1980: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1980 for first
reading, amending Condition No. 4 of Ordinance 1947 as follows:
"4. That signs, flags, banners or displays visible from State College
Boulevard and Sycamore Street, (with the exception of one unlighted sign
of the maximum size of eight square feet which shall be permitted as a
matter of right) shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council."
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANMNDING ORDINANCE NO. 19~7 IN RE-
CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62=63~130.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1980 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the read-
ing in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the
motion. ~DTION CARRIED.
7599
City Hall. Anaheim. Cali. forAia = COUNQIL MINUTES - March 10. 1964. 1:30 P.M.
APPROVAL OF PLANS: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by CounCil-
man Krein, plan of proposed sign was approved, subject to final reading
and adopting of Ordinance No. 1980. MOTION CARRIED. (Plan dated ~his
date and signed by Mayor Coons).
PUBLIC HEAR!NG~ CONDITIONAL US~ PERMIT NOt 533: Submitted by Joseph J..Guzak,
et al, requesting permission to establish a drive-in~ walk-up restaurant~
and waiver of required parking~ R=A property located on the east side of
Euclid Street~ 200 feet north of La Palma Avenue (1112 North Euclid Street).
The City planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
1035~ Series 1963-64~ granted said conditional use permit, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53~feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Euclid Street~ for street widening purposes.
2. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Euclid Street~ as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifia-
tions on file in the office of the City EngineeR prior to final building
inspection.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Euclid Street~ for street lighting
purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works~ prior to
final building inspection.
5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot, along Euclid Street~ for tree planting
purposes.
6. That the existing irrigation ditch along the north property line shall
be replaced with underground irrigation facilities, prior to final
building inspection, and said irrigation facilities shall be subject
to approval of the City Engineer~
7. That Condition Nos. 1, 3 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with
within a period of 180 days from date hereof~ or such further time as
the Commission may grant.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Exhibit No. 1", as amended herein.
9. That twenty=six (26) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance
with the Parking Space Dimension Standards adopted by a resolution of
the City Council.
10. That a 4~foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Euclid Street
frontage and said landscaping maintained~ as indicated on Exhibit No. 1
on file with the Ctty~ that plans for said landscaping shall be sub-
mitred to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance;
and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final bhilding
inspection.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council and public bearing scheduled this date.
Because of a possible conflict of interest~ Mayor Coons withdrew
from the discussion and action on this issuer and Mayor Pro Tem Chandler
assumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
Ntt. Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject property,
the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area~ briefing the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
The City Clerk called attention to communications received from
Mobil Oil Company and from the Misses Helen and Laura Porter, referring to
testimony given at the public hearing before the City Planning Commission
regarding the possible ingress and egress from La Palma Avenue across the
service station property immediately south of subject property.
Mayor Pro Iem Chandler asked if the applicant or his agent was
and wished tO ~ddress the C~ty Council.
7600
Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNC.~IL .MINUTES -.March 10. 1964. 1:30 P.,.~,
Mr. Dan Holden, Attorney representing Mr. Carl Karcher, Authorized
Agent, advised that adequate parking was available on subject property and
access to the property can be Obtained from Euclid Street, and in his opinion,
the issue of additional ingress and egress from La Palma Avenue was irrelevant..
Further, according to the recent title report, there are no existing easements
across subject property with the exception of one owned by the Anaheim Water
Company, and Mr. Karcher holds a letter from said water company setting forth
the conditions whereby the proposed building could be constructed over said
easement.
Mr. Holden referred to the industrial laundry facility north of
subject property, noting that Mr. Karcher is in receipt of a letter from
the manager of said laundry in support of the conditional use permit~
He called attention to other commercial uses in the area, such
as the shopping center across the street~ and further advised that the
existing mortuary to the east (Special Use Permit No. 29) was construc-
ted approximately 65 feet east of the property line, whereas the pro-
posed restaurant will be close to Euclid Avenue, leaving 150 to 200 feet
between the restaurant and the mortuary.
Regarding traffic, Mr. Holden was of the opinion that, with
the recent widening of Euclid Street, no additional prohlem would result
from the proposed drive-in/walk-up restaurant. He further noted the
many years CarlVs restaurants have been established in the City, and
cited the managementgs good control of these operations.
Miss Helen Porter, 600 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, joint owner of the
property to the South, advised that she was one of the former owners of
subject property and objected to the proposed use. She referred to the
minutes of the City Planning Co~mission hearing on subject conditional
use permit pertaining to testimony given hy Mr. Karcher as to a verbal
agreement with the owners of the service station for a drive through
the rear portion of their property. Miss Porter was of the opinion that
no agreement of any kind should have been made without consulting them,
the owners of the property which is under lease to the oil company.
She related her telephone conversation with R. H. Boeke,
District Sales Manager fo~ Mobil Oil Company, and advised it was generally
as set forth in their letter. Miss Porter stated that she advised Mr.
Boeke of her disapproval of the requested restaurant, and further ex-
pressed doubt that the request for access through the service station
property would be granted.
Miss Porter was of the opinion that the request to Mobil Oil
Company was made in order to preclude ingress and egress from Euclid
Street only, and that the City Planning Commission granted the Con-
ditional Use Permit partially on the basis of the statement concerning
negotiations for access from La Palma Avenue; she thereupon requested
that Conditional Use Permit No. 533 he denied.
In answer to Councilman Chandler"s question as to the reason
for her opposition to this use, Miss Porter advised that the requested
use would be incompatible with the area, that a precedent would be
established, and that she objected to the request for access across the
service station property.
Miss Porter further advised that the City Planning Commission
previously granted the present owner of subject property Reclassifica-
tion (No. 62-63-117) and a Variance (No. 1575) for an office building,
the purpose for which they sold the property to Mr. Guzak. Although
they now have no control over the property, she was of the opinion that
the proposed restaurant could lower the value of their property.
Mr. Carl Karcher, in answer to Council questioning, reported
that according to a letter, dated January 21, 1964, from Anaheim Union
Water Company, they will either abandon their easement through subject
property, or the existing concrete canal, which is being used at the
7601
City Ha.l. 1, Anaheim, California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES- March 10, 1964. 1:30 P.M.
present time, will be replaced with a new underground pipeline, over
which the building will be constructed.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council and
discussion held, and it was noted that the letter from Anaheim Union
Water Company states that the foregoing method can be accomplished
in the event they find it necessary to maintain their facility through
subject property, indicating the probability that they might find it
unnecessary to maintain their easement.
Ntt. Karcher stated that negotiations are pending with Mobil~
Oil Company to work out a mutual access through their leased property,
that he has an appointment to meet with representatives of said company
on March 12, 1964; further, he clarified his statements made at the
hearing before the Planning Commission, stressing that access could be
confined to Euclid Street and ample parking still pro¥ided.
Mayor Pro /em Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address
the City Council in opposition.
Miss Laura Porter, one of the owners of the service station
property, expressed her agreement with statements made by Miss Helen
Porter, and urged that consideration be given to their position as
owners of adjacent property. She noted their disappointment that the
previously proposed office building failed to materialize, and in her
opinion, if the property were limited to Euclid Street access existing
traffic problems would multiply.
In answer to Council questioning, Miss Porter further advised
that the service station property measures 150 feet by 150 feet, while
the subject parcel is 86 feet by 150 feet. She inquired as to the
number of parking spaces which would be provided.
Miss Porter was informed that 26 parking spaces were shown
on the plans, which would conform to the standards recon~nended for
drive=in and walk=up restaurants.
Mayor Pro Tem Chandler felt that a good cross section of the
evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NOo 64R=162: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-162
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 533, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 533.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
NOES: COUNCILN~N: None
ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: None
TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILNt~N: Coons
Mayor Pro Tam Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R~162 duly
passed and adopted.
Mayor Coons returned to the meeting, 10:30 P.M. and resumed
Chairmainship of the meeting.
PUBLIC H~ARING, RECLASSIFICATION NOo $3=64=88: Submitted by First Federal
Savings and Loan Association of Alhambra, requesting change of zone from
R-2 to C-O, property located at the northeast corner of Center Street and
Evelyn Drive~
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1073,
Seri~s 1963~64, recommended R~class~fication NO, 65-64-88 for approval,i
subject to the following conditions:
7602
City Hall. Anaheim, Ca~iforpia - COUNCIL MINUIES - MaTch 10, 1964, %:30 P,M,
2.
That the sidewalks shall be installed along Center Street and
Evelyn Drive, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the
City Engineer, prior to final building inspection.
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building inspection.
That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Center Street and Evelyn Drive,
for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date
hereof, whichever occurs first..
That the driveway on Center Street, an exit only, shall be signed
for "Right Turn Only", (No island opening is opposite the driveway
and Center Street is one-way traffic to the west.)
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3~ and in accordance with the C-O, Commercial
Office, Zone standards.
That all air-conditioning facilities shall be property shielded from
view from the abutting streets.
~r. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was'present and had anything
to add to the evidence.
Ntt. Marvin Essenmacher, Manager of First Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Alhambra, presented colored renderings of'the interior ~nd
exterior of proposed two=story building, and advised that the Savings
and loan offices would occupy the first floor with the exception of two
offices which would be rented until their future expansion program re-
quires occupancy by their firm; that the upper floor would be used for
a conference room and community room to be available for public use.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council
for or against the requested Cc~O Zoning~ there being no response, declared
the hearing closed.
R~OLUT.IQN NO, 64R-[63: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-163
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~JNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED, (63-64-88 - G~O)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: DuttOn, Chandler, Schutte, Kreim and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-163 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURN~NT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED°
ADJOURNED: 10:32 P.M.
' -~City ~lerk