Loading...
1964/03/247626 City Hall..Anahe%m, California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, 1964~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT~ PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMAN: Schutte. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. ~IN.UTE$: Minutes of the meeting held March 10, 1964, were approved on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RESOL~IQN ~0. 64R-186: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-186 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MARCH 24, 1964. (Warrants Nos. 30531 to 30797, both inclusive, - $511,799.05) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor~declared Resolution No. 64R-186 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEAR~NQ: Public hearing was held on request submitted by George W. Cavanaugh for permission to move a four-car garage from 14410 South Avalon Boulevard, Gardena, California, to 1977 Dogwood Avenue, Anaheim. Application and pictures together with report of Building Department concerning said structure, were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. L. L. Mills, 1962 West La Palma Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition to said permit, advising that five of the property owners directly affected, were present at the meeting. He further advised that their homes were relatively new and they objected to this garage or any other used building being moved into their area, as in their opinion it would commence degeneration of the entire neighborhood. Mr. Mills further advised that none of the residents knew what the building looked like, and felt objections would be less should the buildin9 be a new structure. Mayor Coons read report of the Building Department, resulting from inspection of the building, wherein it was noted that the building met all Building Code requirements. Mrs. Jackson, 1976 West La Palma Avenue, advised that her residence was directly to the rear of the Cavanaugh home, and that their front room faces the alley and would look directly into the four car garage, which in her opinion would be no improvement to their property. Further, she advised that the alley is presently congested and will become more so if the permit is granted. Mrs. Joseph Lambiaso, 1966 West La Palma Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition, supportiDg statements made by Mrs. Jackson and further advised that many children play in the alley area. Margaret J. Butler, 1972 West La Palma Avenue, advised that when previously questioned by Mrs. Cavanaugh concerning the garage, they 7627 C~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~ 1.9~4~ i:30.P.M. had no objections to moving in a two-car garage, however, the proposed four-car garage was too large. Nits. Butler stated that the fourteen children living in the area would be in danger by the increased congestion in the alley. Councilman Chandler noted that the plans indicated a two-car garage and the balance of the building to be converted into a room. Nits. Lawrence Lee, 1922 West La Palma Avenue, advised that originally the driveway was from Dogwood and subject property did not use the alley. Nits. Cavanaugh, Applicant, reported that they intended to have a two-car garage and a 12-foot by 20-foot room, which will later. be attached to the house with a bathroom built in between. She stated that the reason for the request was to enlarge their home which is smaller than others in the area, and further reported that the garage facing Dog- wood has been converted into a room and the driveway to the former garage will be closed. N[rSo Cavanaugh reported that the garage will be set back 9 feet from the alley and will be at least 6 feet further back from the alley than other garages in the area, and with the removal of the fence to provide for the garage, an additional 9 feet turning space will be available for the property to the north° Nits. Cavanaugh stated that they needed only a two-car garage as they have only two cars, and the garage building is a good building approximately five years old and newer than their home which is approxi- mately ten or eleven years old~ that this building was moved from an area where a future freeway will be constructed. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 64R~i87: Councilman Chandler advised that his action would be based on what is permissible in the city, and that the subject building could be construc'ted under the present building code by obtaining a building permit. He thereupon offered Resolution No. 64R-187 granting permission to move said building onto subject property, subject to compliance with all provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO GEORGE W. CAVANAUGH TO MOVE A BUILDING FROM 14410 SOUTH AVALON BOULEVARD, GARDENA, TO 1977 DOGWOOD AV£NUE~ ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIL~N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dut'ton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None $chutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-187 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64.-23 (VARIANCE NO. 1626): Submitted by Giacomo and Agostina Lugaro, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l; property briefly described as located on the eas't side of Magnolia Avenue, approxi- mately 658 feet south of Crescent Avenue. Public hearing before the City Council was held January 28, 1964, at which time said hearing was closed and action deferred to this date, to allow initiation of public hearing by the City Planning ComJnission on proposed amendment to the General Plan~ It was reported that the City Planning Commission's recommendations concernin9 General Plan Amendment Nco 12 together with action taken on Variance 7628 City Hg~l~ Anahgi~, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, ~64, [:30 P~M. No. 1626, concerning waiver of minimum lot area, would be submitted to the City Council April 7, 1964. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, decision on Reclassification No. 63-64-23 was continued to April 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M. to be considered in conjunction with City Planning Co~mlisgion's recommendations relative to General Plan Amendment No. 12, and Variance No. 1626. MOTION CARRIED. The City Clerk was instructed to schedule said proposed amendment to the General Plan No. 12 for public hearing before the City Council, April 7, 1964, 1:30 P.M. ~PP~C6~.ION..- FA~I.LY B~..LLIARD PERMIT (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 52~): Applica- tion submitted by William Emmet Kain, for permission to establish a family billiard center at 1287 East Lincoln Avenue (Conditional Use Permit No. 529) serving no liquor, was submitted and granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO~ 12~ Order to show cause why Variance No. 1222 should not be revoked for the non-payment of street lighting fees, Magic Lamp Motel, 1030 West Katella Avenue, was cancelled as payment of said fee was made March 23, 1964. RECI, AS$IFICATION NO. 62-63-35 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 313 (TRACT NO, 5403) - REVISE~ PLA~S: Request of C. Ross Dean for approval of revised plans, for proposed R-3 development to be located on the west side of Knott Avenue~ approximately 614 feet south of Lincoln Avenue, was submitted. Revised plans together with reports from the City Engineer and the Planning Departments were reviewed by the City Council. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, revised plans marked ~'Revision No. 2" were approved as requested. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION ~0. ~4R-188 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-~8): Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R=188 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-44 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-58. (Amends description) Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-188 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION. NO, ~4R-18~ ICONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 503.).~' Councilman Dutton offered ~.~ Resolution Noo 64R-189 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION 'NO. 64R-45 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 503. (Amends description) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT.' COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-189 duly passed and adopted. 7629 city ~al~, Anaheim, G~liforn%a - COUNCI~ MINUTES - March ~4, 19~4. 1.:30 P,.M. CITY P-.L~NNING CON~ISSION ITEN~: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission - at their meeting held March 2, 1964, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and considerationl VARIANCE NO. 1623: Submitted by Marcus A. Gartner, requesting waiver of minimum'size dwelling unit and minimum lot area per dwelling unit, on R-2 property briefly described as located on the east side of Sabina Street, approximately 240 feet south of La Palma Avenue (900 North Sabina Street) The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1079~ Series 1963-64, granted said variance subject to conditions. yARIANCE N0,.%624.: Submitted by J. V. Vandruff, requesting waiver of required front yard setback on R-O property briefly described as located on the south side of Westmont Drive, approximately 997 feet east of Loara Street (1430 ~ Westmont Drive). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1080, Series 1963-64, granted said variance subject to conditions. The foregoing applications were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered variance applications. WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION: Report of the City Planning Commission recommending Wagner-Rio Vista Annexation, and report of Orange County Boundary Commission, dated March 9, 1964~ finding the boundaries of said proposed annexation to he reasonably definite and certain as to Section 35002 of the Government'~Code, were ordered received and filed, on motion of Councilman Chandler, seconded hy Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ~ Nit. Davis reported that a request to exclude property on which there is a gravel pit operation has been received. He further reported that this property was excluded from a previous annexation because the proposed city boundary line then cut through the property involved. ~ Ntt. Davis requested an expression of the City Council concerning this matter, as it was his understanding that the owner of the proper~y plans to appear before the Local Formation Commission requesting exclusiOn.~ Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined that the inclusion of such a parcel of property would straighten th~ city boundary lines and should exclusion of subject property be granted, a small island of County territory would be created, thereupon on motion by CouncilmBn Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Manager's Office was instructed to appear at the hearing before the Local Formation Co~mission to express the position of the City of Anaheim concerning exclusion from said annexation of this parcel of property. ~OTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-190: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-190 terminating the following zoning actions, in accordance with recommendations of the City Planning Commission: Variance No. 1259 Reclassification No. 56-57-63 Reclassification No. 58-59-87 Reclassification No. 56-57-89 Reclassification No. 57-58-61 Reclassification No. 58-59-14 Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 1259, AND CERTAIN R£CIASS~IFICATION PROCEEDINGS AS NK)RE PARTICULARLY HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and CoOns NOES: COUNCILN~N: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte 7630 CitN PLa. il.,..~nahgi.m, California - COUNCIL MINUTE$ ~ .Ma~.ch 24,~ 1964., 1:$0 P~M~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-190 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO, 56-57-63: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, vacation of C~.3 deed restrictions recorded by Hubert D. and Mildred I. Baxter, 3uly 30, 1957, in Book 3990, Page 304, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE ~AAPS - TRACT Nos. 5438, 5449 AND 5495: Request of Nkr. William M. Pierce~ to defer Council action on above numbered tracts to March 31, 1964, 1~30 P.M., was granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Council- man Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE ~AP - TRACT NO., 5499 - REVISION NO. 1: Request of Stewart A. Clark to defer Council action on Revision No. 1 to Tentative Map Tract No. 5499 to be considered in conjunction with Variance No. 1625, tentatively scheduled for the City Council April 7, 1964, 1:30 PoM., was granted on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. NDTION CARRIED. TENT$T!VE M~..P - TRACT NCo 5529: Lomar Developers Incorporated, tract located on the south side of Savanna Street, approximately 660 feet west of Knott Avenue and contains 10 proposed R-2 lots (Reclassification No. 63-64-60). Th~ City Plannin9 Commission recommended said tentative map subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, ,~ each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the "Not A Part", north of Lot No. 1, shall be included as a lot within the tract, or that the dedicated strip of land 32 feet from the ,~ center line of Savanna Street shall be fully improved in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. That the east half of the north-south street shall be 22.5 feet wide and shall include Lot "A", one-foot wide. This is adjacent to the ~ "Not-A-Part", north of Lot No. 10. 4. That a predetermined price for Lot "A" shall be calculated and an agreement for dedication entered into between the Developer and the City of Anaheim prior to approval of the final tract map. The cost _. of Lot "A" shall include land and a proportionate share of the under- ground utilities and street improvements. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, Tentative Map of Tract No. 5529 was approved, subject to the recommenda- tions of the City Planning Commission. NDTION CARRIED. REC~$.~IF~CGT%O~ NO, ~0-61-~8: Request of Ntt. Harry Knisely for six months extension of time to comply with requirements of Reclassification No. 60-61-58, and six months temporary use and occupancy permit to allow use of existing residence as an office during construction of an office building, was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. NEDTION CARRIED. RESgLU~ION ~0., 64R-191.: In accordance with recOmmendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-191 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. ; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED · PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVI~MENT] THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE PARK SITE AT UNDERHILL AVENUE AND SUNKIST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 804 ALTERNATE NO. 2. (Pebley Bros. - $19,704.22, Alternate No. 2) Roll call vote: 7631 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, 1964, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ grein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-191 duly passed and adopted. FINAL ACCEPTANCE - JOB NO. 824 - JOB NO. 826 - JOB NO.. 4~07: Director of Public Works, Thornton E. Piersall~ certified that 3ob Nos. 824, 826 and 4807, were completed in accordance with plans and specifications and recommended said work be officially accepted and notices of completion filed. In accordance with recommendations of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 64R-192, 64R-193 and 64R%194. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 64R~192: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF BALL ROAD, FROM CLAUDINA PLACE TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NOo 824. (Warren Southwest, Inc.) RESOLUTION NOo 64R~193: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING IHE COMPLETION ANDTHE FURNISHING OF ALL PLA~T, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WAIER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF EUCLID STREET, ON THE EAST SIDE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 1090 FEET SOUTH OF BALL ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY 1340 FEET SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF . ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 8260 (R. J. Noble Co.) i RESDLUTION UPo 64R-19~: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIMFINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL LrfILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND IHE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO WIT: THE iMPROVE- MENI OF KNOIY AVENUE, FROM LINCOLN AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NOo 4807. (Griffith Co.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 64R-192, 64R-193 and 64R2194,, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-lg5: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-195 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH EUREKA WATER SYSTEM WITH REFERENCE TO THE FURNISHING OF WATER FOR TRACT NO. 796. (Webster Street area) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R=195 duly passed and adopted. 7632 City Hg!l, Anahgim, California -.COUNCIL. MINUTES - March 24, 1964~ 1:30 WATER.RAT~S..,..AND CHARGES3 Discussion was held concerning proposed resolution combining all water charges, fees and rates; establishing new multi-family rate, and amending general service schedule, irrigation water schedule and Rule No. 1 pertaining to commodity adjustment clause. Report concerning recommended adjustments was submitted and action on said resolution ordered held over to March 31, 1964, to allow further study of said report. Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess, Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:20 P.M.) AFTER ~EC~$~ MaYor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Schutte. RESOLUTION .~0o 64R-196: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-196 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book-. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A REQUEST TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR FUNDS FROM THE CROSSING PROTECTION FUND FOR PROTECTION OF CROSSINGS NO. 2N.0.6 AND NO. 2N-l.1 AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD AND ANAHEIM ROAD, AND THE SANTA FE RAILROAD AND LA PALMA AVENUE, RESPECTIVELY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILN~N: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-196 duly passed and adopted. CO~ESpONpE~CEI The following correspondence was ordered received and filed : on motion hy Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION .~ CARRIED~ Amendment to Application for Specific Rate Increase Authority, Supplementing The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company's showing in Case Nco 7409. A Resolution of the City Council o~ the City of Stanton Protesting the Breaking up of the Orange County Directory of the Pacific Telephone Company into five sections. Ce Minutes of the Orange County Mosquito Abatement District meeting held on Friday,.February 21, 1964. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 64R-197, 64R-198 - and 64R-199 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° R~SOL.U~ION NO~ $4R-1~7: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim Union High School District of Orange County) R~SOLUTIO~ NO~ 64R-1~8: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AOCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR A WATER LINE. (Belmont Savings and Loan Association) .P~.SO~U~ION NO~ 64R-1~9: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE PURPOSES. (Belmont Savings and Loan Association) - ! 7633 City Hall, ADaheim¶ California - CQUNCIL MINUTES - March 24., i964~ 1.~30 P~M~ Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILN~N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: Dutton, Chandler~ Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Nos, 64R-197, 64R-198 and 64R-199, duly passed and adopted. O~DINA.N~,E NQ.. 1981: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No, 1981 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANMNDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODH RELATING TO ZONING. (59-60-62 - C-I) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1981 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance he waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILNMN: NOES: COUNCIL~N: ABSENT: COUNCILNMN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte Mayor CoOns declared Ordinance No. 1981 duly passed and adopted. QQUNI¥ WIDE Nt~STER TRAFFIC SIGNAL .CONTROL SYSTEM: Ntt. Davis submitted a report from the City Engineer regarding a proposed county wide master traffic signal control system, whereby each participating agency, by radio signals, can synchronize and control signals to provide a longer or shorter cycle' and provide a more flexible system for traffic control. 1~, Davis reported that the basic control would be provided by the County of Orange, and participating cities would be required to install receiving units on signal locations, thereby coordinating the movement of traffic on major highways throughout cities and the CounSy Ntt. Maddox reported that the cost to the county would be approxi- ma.tely $80,000.00 to $90,000.00 for the master control and transmitter, and the cost to the city approximately $2,000.00 for each receiver and decoder for each signal; or interconnection between signals by private lines could be accomplished. Mr. Maddox further reported that Harbor Boulevard would be an ideal location for a pilot program; that the ability to pre-program the signals to meet traffic conditions would he most valuable, however, it has not been determined at this time if the city would require a transmitter and decoder for each signal, or whether it would he less expensive to interconnect signals. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the city indicate by a letter their willingness to support a county wide traffic control system in the City of Anaheim, and will when the necessity'arises, appropriate the fu6ds required to utilize the system in connection with the City Traffic Control Program, by providing the required equipment at the local level. NDTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL APPLICATIONS: Application filed by Del-Arwin Inc., for Person Io Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, at 226 North Manchester Avenue, was submitted, No action was taken by the City Council. 7634 City ~a~ll~ 6naheim~ Qallfgrnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~. 1964. 1:30 P.~.~,. b. Application filed by Kenlou Inc., for New On-Sale Beer License, at 2815 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney's Office was authorized to file protest to said applica- tion on the basis that the present C-1 zoning of the property prohibits the sale of "On-Sale Beer". MOTION CARRIED. Application filed by Guardino and Prudhomme, for New On-Sale Beer and Wine License, 1126 North Los Angeles Street, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Mt,in, the City Attorney's Office was authorized to file protest, on the basis of the close proximity to the La Palma Park and Stadium. MOTION CARRIED. Application filed by William E, McKinley, for New On-Sale Beer License, at 239 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted. The City Attorney's Office was instructed to notify the owners of subject property that the building must he brought up to code require- ments before this use of the building will he permitted. SIGNAL - £U~LID OFF-RAMP: Mr. Maddox reported on proposals made and efforts of the Engineering Department and State Division of Highways, concerning suggested changes in the traffic pattern of the Euclid off-ramp of the Santa Aha Freeway. He advised that the last proposal submitted is presently ~ being considered by the State° PER~ONNEL.?~OOEDURES - RULE 30: Discussion was held by the City Council concerning Rule 30~ It was a general feeling of the City Council that the rule that was written was too restrictive. Councilman Krein suggested the Personnel Department revise the rule to prohibit employment of closely related persons in the same department, and prohibit employment of closely related persons of elected officials. ~ ,RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M., Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. ND/ION CARRIED. (4:20 P.M.) AFTER REC~S~: Mayor Pro Tem Chandler called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COUNCILN~N: ABSENTs PRESENT: Dutton, Krein and Chandler. COUNCILN~N: Schutte and Coons. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph-Geisler. CITY CLERK: Den. M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Grudzinski. INVOQA%ION: Reverend Apol, of the Anaheim Christian Reformed Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG S~LUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Chandler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBliC ,HEARING - REG,LA~SIFIGAT!,ON ,NO. 63-64-62..AND GEHERAL ~,LA~N At,~ND~E, NT,,NQ. 10: Submitted hy Hubert D. Drummond and several Contiguous property owners fronting Webster Street (Tract No. 796); Leonard Smith, Authorized Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on certain properties located along the east and west sides of Webster Avenue, between Orange Avenue and Ball Road (Portion A); and from R=A to C-1 on properties located at the northwest and northeast corners of Webster Avenue and'Ball Road (Portion B). The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1058, Series 1963-64, recommended that General Plan Amendment No. 10 be approved (R-3 and C-O). 7635 City Ha%l, Anaheim, C.alif.ornia - COUNCIL ~IN~TES ~ March..2~, %964, .1:30 .p,M. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1059, Series 1963~64, recommended R~3 zoning on Portion A, and zoning on Portion B, subject to the following conditions: 12. ' property. 1. That prior to the reading of the ordinance reclassifying any portion of subject property a legal description shall be submitted by the property owner covering said property. 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32=feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Orange Avenue and Webster Street for street widening purposes. 3. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53=feet in width, from the center line of Ball Road for street widening purposes. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Orange Avenue, Webster Street and Ball Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving~ drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2°00 per front foot, along Orange Avenue, Webster Street and Ball Road, for street lighting purposes. 6. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection~ 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined'to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to final building inspection, and that a water flow shall be provided which is determined by the Fire Chief to be sufficient for adequate fire protection. 9. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Conleyl Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer. This is reguired of the property owner located east of the terminus on Conley Street. 10. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Webster Street, Orange Avenue~ and Ball Road, for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first. 11. That the plans of development for any portion of subject property shall be submitted to Development Review for report and recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council, and that said planS, shall be subject to the approval of the Commission and Council, provided that any plans for any property under Portion "A" shall be limited to a density not to exceed 18 dwelling units per net residential acre or buildin9 site, and shall be limited to one-story construction within 150 feet of any property classified in the R-i, One Family Residential, Zone, and further provided that plans for Portion "B" shall conform to all provisions of the C-O, Commercial Office Zone. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11, above'mentioned~, shall be complied with prior to reading of an ordinance On subject Mr. Grudzinski noted the location of subject property, and ~he existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He noted that subjec~ application was first considered by the City Planning Commission on December 23, 1963, and continued to February 17, 1964, to allow for sludy and preparation of overlays by the Planning Department, indicating ways of possible development for consideration by the Commission. I--7 -- I I I 7636 City H~.ll, AnaheiM, California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, 1964, 1:30 P~M. Four Alternative Plan Studies were considered (67-28-1). 1. Low density development of 5.8 dwelling units per net residential acre. 2. Low density development based on 7 dwelling units per acre. Low medium density development based on 14 dwelling units per net residential acre. 4. High density development based on 27 dwelling units per acre. Based on the realization that a portion of ail subject property was within 150 feet of single family development requiring single-story construction, it was realized that the fourth alternative could not be possible, thereupon it was recommended that reclassification be made to the C-O 2one along the Bail Road frontage, and R~3 Zone on the balance of the property limited to 18 units per net residential acre, in accordance with recommended Condition No. 10~ Further, it was recommended that an amendment to the General Plan be made in accordance with said reclassifica- tion. Petition of protest purportedly containing 90 signatures was submitted and read at open meeting. Also submitted were letters urging approval of said reclassification from the following: William and Nina Simmons Lowell F. McDaniel Homer and Doris L. Kirk Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if the applicants or their re- presentative wished to address the Council. Ntt. Leonard Smith, 125 South Claudina Street, Anaheim, Authorized Agent for the applicants, addressed the Council requesting approval of said application as originally presented° He stated that during the several hearings held on this issue, there was evidenced some apprehension do to the fact that plans of development have not been presented; that he per- sonally knew of no City ordinance requiring development plans to be pre- sented. In his opinion, the ordinances governing certain setbacks, size of units, number of garage% together with the Building Code regulations would adequately control the type of units to be built on these various parcels of property. Ntt. Smith reported that the 63 owners of these 39 parcels of property, have expressed the type of zoning and development they prefer, and further noted that there would be no access to the east or west and would be no connection with the adjacent residential tracts. He reported that Webster Street was originally developed into estate size lots, and that the area was no longer ~uitable for this type of living, nor was it suitable to have a single-family development on a 3/4 acre of ground. Ntt. Smith noted that the City Planning Commission recommended R-3 zoning, limiting two-story construction within 150 feet of any single-family residential area, and further limited development to 18 units per acre. He requested the 18 units per acre limitation be deleted and noted that the rear 150 feet, that must be held to single-story construction, could be utilized for recreational, trash storage areas and garages, and would be a suitable buffer between the single-family residences and the multiple-family units. Mr. Smith advised that much had been said recently regarding urban renewal and redevelopmen~ and particular attention has been given to the downtown area. He noted that there were other areas in the city needing redevelopment and advised that in order to make redevelopment practical, it must be economically attractive to developers. Ntt. Smith then presented a typical layout illustrating how multiple development can be accomplished on the 39 lots in question, .7637 City Hall~ 6naheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2,4~ ,~964~ 1:30 P.M. and advised that the plot plan was in compliance with all requirements of the zoning ordinances of the city, and covers 45 per cent of the lot area, providing for 23 units on the property~ furthermore, the~balance of the property would be devoted to driveways, r~cre~tional and landscape areas. Nit. Smith advised that by providing 23 units on each parcel of property, it would permit the individual owner to redevelop the property or attract developers to a section of the city in need of redevelopment. In conclusion, Ntt. Smith requested the 3 lots facing Ball Road be reclassified C-l, as in his ppinion, there was no apparent need for a C-O Zone in this particular areat and that the balance of the property be reclassified R=3, eliminating restrictions as to the number of dwelling units, the development thereof could be regulated under present R-3 zone requirements. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address /he Council in support of said application° Nlr. Homer Kirk, 918 South Webster Street, addressed the Council urging approval of said application as submitted, advising that he was physically unable to care for the property, and further advising that he had attempted to sell the property approximately one year ago and was forced to take the property back. Ntt. Kirk further advised of an attempt made approximately two years ago, wherein all the lots would be combined in an effort to subdivide. At that time it was determined that the number of people who were not~ interested in selling were sufficient to make this transaction unattractive to a developer. Ntt Kirk stated that the fact that these lots are tooilarge for a single-family residence could not be disputed and also it could"not be denied that those interested in these large lots were either contractors or people desiring to keep livestock. '~ Regarding privacy, Ntt. Kirk was of the opinion that the residents of the adjacent tracts would be assured more privacy than many in a normal subdivision, and further advised that he was a former member of the Magnolia School District Board of Trustees~ and it was the result of new subdivisions in the area that additional school facilities were obtained. In his Opinion, they in the area, have supported and met their obligation in obtainin9 needed schools and improving school conditions. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in support of the application, there being no response, invited those in opposition to address the Council° ~ Mrs. Wilhelmina Wendell, 910 South Texella, addressed the Council in opposition stating the following reasons therefor: i. Lack of pride in home ownership on the part of apartment tenants. The approximate 30 Jcres on which R-3 reclassification is requested was a large area with no plans of development~ that recommended approval without plans of development was an unprecedented action on the part of the City Planning Commission. In her opinion, definite plans should be submitted. 3. Prior to purchasing her home she had checked the adjoining area and was advised that the area would be maintained as low density. According to the March report, there is a 14.7 per cent vacancy in apartments in the Cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove, or 3~870 vacant units. 5. Apartment development would depreciate the value of the adjoining~residen- rial property, 6. Tenants of apartments are not tax payers and their occupancy is only temporary. ~ 7638 City H~i%j ~naheimj California - COUNCIL MINUTES = March 24~ 1~4~ 1~30 P~M~ '~[rs. Wendell advised the City Council of the reason why they in opposition to subject reclassification were absent from the February 17 meeting, and reported that they were not aware of the meeting as no notices had been sent to those residing on their side of the street. She was of the further opinion that had they been present, the City Planning Commission would have recommended denial of the application. Mrs. Wendell in conclusion advised of her approval of the recommended C-O Zone on Ball Road. Mr. Gene Maxwell representing J and C Development Company, owner of Tract No. 5114, advised that in March 1962 and according to Plan Study 33-28-3, the Webster Street area was projected for R-1 development, and in September 1962, an R-3 reclassification on the property at the corner of Webster Street and Orange Avenue was denied~ in September 1963, Tract No. 5114 containing 9 single-family homes was approved and construction is now nearing completion. Mr. Maxwell was of the opinion that the adjoining subdivision residences would be more affected than those presently living on Webster Street who will in all probability sell their properties and move to other areas. Mr. Maxwell reported that the petition submitted and referred to earlier, contained approximately 90 names representing people within 300 feet of subject property, and representing those people most directly affected and concerned, as apartments would certainly increase the load on the school and on all facilities in the area. Nlr. Maxwell stated that the existence of Tract No. 5114 was certain proof that the property could be developed into a very high caliber single-family residential area. Further, the builders of Tract No, 5114 had informed him that several commitments to purchase are now pending on the outcome of subject application, as prospective purchasers have advised that they do not wish to purchase if the area is to be zoned R-3, and further indicated to him that the large R-3 area was incompatible with existing zoning° Mr. C. L. Black, 2467 Orange Avenue, addressed the Council advising that they have objected to all the applications previously filed in this area requesting R-3 zoning. He called attention to the many existing apartments in the city, and was of the opinion that subject property should remain R-l, maintaining the present values of the property in the area and keeping the present facilities adequate to serve the population. Mr. Homer Kirk in rebuttal, advised that the previous R?$ application applied for in 1962, was for property on Orange Avenue, approximately 150 feet east of Webster Street, and those in opposition were protesting an apartment on Orange Avenue not Webster Street. He further recalled that at that'time, the City Planning Commission asked for further staff study and recommenda- tion as it was then felt that Webster Street might better be zoned R-3 because of the dimensions of the lots. Au result of the study, it was recommended the separate properties apply for R~3 zoning when ready to develop. Mr. Kirk stated that he was one that opposed the bachelor apartments directly to the rear of his property~ that the zoning was approved and since the apartments have been constructed, there have been no problems at all, in fact, one is hardly aware that they are there. Mr. Smith in rebuttal, was of the opinion that no evidence had been presented to warrant the property remaining single-family residential. He again advised that the property owners were interested in either redeveloping their property or selling for redevelopment. Mr. Smith requested the application as originally submitted (R-3 and C-l) be approved subject to all existing city ordinances permit- lng the properties to be developed as outlined, that is; 23 units, 7639 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL M!N.UTES - March 24, 1964., 1:30 P~M. utilizing 45 per cent of the lot area with sufficient open area re- maining for landscaping and recreation; placing the garages to the rear which would be an adequate buffer for the R-1 homes. Regarding plans of development, Ntt. Smith advised that to his knowledge the requirement to submit plans of development was a policy of the City Planning Commission and not covered by city ordinance. He called attention to the fact that the City Council would have complete control by requiring plans of development to be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Discussion was held concerning the typical plot plan, and Mr. Smith advised that the limitation of 18 units per acre would actually result in only 12 or 13 units per lot as the lots in question are only a portion of an acre. That this was insufficient to induce anyone to destroy the residence on the property in order to redevelop, and for this reason he requested the requirement of 18 units per acre be omitted to allow compliance with city ordinances. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler was of the opinion that sufficient evidence both for and against had been submitted~ and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION~ Councilman Krein advised that in his opinion the property could be developed R-l, and thereupon offered resolution denying ReclassifiCation No. 63-64-62. Roll call votes AYES: COUNCILN~N~ NOES: COUNCILNMN: ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: Krein Dutton and Chandler Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared said resolution having not ~eceived a majority aye votes, failed to carry, RESOLUTION NO. 64R-200: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-200 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R-3 on Portion A and to C-1 on Portion Bp amending Condition No. 11 accordingly, and further subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission adding thereto Condition No. 13 to read "Present buildings on subject':property to be removed prior to C-1 and R-3 use respectively". ~ Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MJNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AT THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (63~64~62 - R-3 & C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCiLmEN: Dutton and Chandler NOES: COUNCIL~EN: Krein ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: Scbutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-200 duly~passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-2Qi IGENEgA.L .PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 19)~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-201, approving amendment to the General Plan and instructing the Planning Department to further amend said plan by changing the symbols thereon to conform with zoning action taken. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 10. 7640 City HQ.11~ .Anah~iml. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~ 1964~ 1:30 Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILBEN: NOES: COUNCILNMN: ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: Dutton and Chandler Krein Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-201 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-65 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 519: Submitted by Paul E. Beatty, Ralph W. Beatty and Ruth A. Harris (Dorm Kemble Authorized Agent), requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and permission to establish a two-story multiple-family planned residential development and waiver of one-story height limitation, property briefly described as having a frontage on the south side of Anaheim Road and a frontage on the northerly side of the Riverside Freeway, approximately 2,020 feet west o{ Blue Gum Street (2610 Anaheim Road). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1054, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That the grade and alignment of Anaheim Road and the Sunkist Street overcrossing shall be approved by the State Division of Highways. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 34-feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Anaheim Road, for street widening purposes. 3. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a street 60-feet wide terminating in a 50-foot radius cul-de-sac as shown on Exhibit No. 1, Revision No. 2. The street shall have a 40- foot roadway with lO-foot parkways. 4. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Anaheim Road, and the newly dedicated street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. (Curbs shall be located at 24-feet from the centerline along Anaheim Road with parking prohibited.) 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Anaheim Road, and the newly dedicated street, for street lighting purposes. 6, That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Anaheim Road and the newly dedi- cated street, for tree planting purposes! said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first. 7. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is con- tingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 519. 8. That Condition Nos. 2, 3~ 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9. That existing easements for water, sewer, and power facilities shall be maintained in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. 10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Revision No. 2, Exhibit No. 1, and Revision No. 1, Exhibit Nos. 2, 3, and 4. 11. That in accordance with City Council policy~ a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southwest and southeast property lines separating the proposed development from any abutting arterial streets or highways. 12. That this reclassification shall be limited for that portion of subject property for which plans of development have been submitted. 7641 City Hall, Anaheim, California.- COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M, The City Planning Commission Pursuant to Resolution No.'i055, Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 519 subject to the following conditions: That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, skid amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to final building inspection. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 63-64-65. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No. 2, Exhibit No. 1, and Revision No. 1, Exhibit Nos. 2, 3, and 4. N~. Mickelson noted the location of the property and summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem asked if the applicants or their agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Phil Hove, representing the Beatty interest, was preserrt for the purpose of answering questions, and advised that they wero in~ accordance with the City Planning Commission's recommendation and decision. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either for or against said applications, there being no r~sponse, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION 64R-202: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-202, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as r~quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM N~JNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AN~NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (63-64-65 - R-3) Roll call vote: 'AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-202 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION. NO~ 64R-203: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R%203 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 519, subject to the recommendati~ms of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 519. AYES: COUNC IL~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Goons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-203 duly passed and adopted. 7642 ~ity Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~ ~64~ 1:30 PUBLIC HE~R..~NG r RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-64-70 AND .VARIANCE NO,. 1617: Submitted by Howard M. Lang, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and waiver of one-story height limitation within 150 feet of R-A property. Property described as having frontages on the south side of Crowther Avenue, and the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, approximately 1575 feet east of Dowling Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1061, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is con- tingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1617. 3, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the standards of the Ri3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1062, Series 1963-64, granted Variance No. 1617 subject to the following conditions: That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclas- sification Nco 63~64~70. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. NM. Mickelson noted the location of the property, and briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. Copy of letter of protest sent to Anaheim City Planning Commission was submitted. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO, 64R-204: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-204 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-70 - R~3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-204 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO,. 64R-205: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-205 granting Variance No. 1617 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1617. 7643 City Hall~ Anaheim, Californ. ia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, 1964, .1:30 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT'. COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-205 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NOo 5.482.:' Submitted by Aldor Investment CompaD~, · Developers, filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64-70 and Variance No. 1617~ tract containing 29 proposed R-3 lots. The City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Tentative Map subject to the following conditions~ That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5482 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 63-64-70 and Variance No. 1617. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley o~enings, to Orang,thorpe Avenue and Crowther Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That the alley access to Crowther Avenue shall be eliminated by ~locating the alley between Lot Nos. 19 and 22. A driveway from the alley will be permitted to serve Lot Nos. 18 and 19. 6. That all alley intersections shall conform to the City of Anaheim Standard Plan No. 130. That "A" Street shall be named Bedford Way! that "B" Street shall be named Cameron Street~ and that "C" Street shall be named Bates Street. Mr. Mickelson called attention to Condition No. 4 requiring the alley to be stubbed out to a local street, and advised that the tract map has been amended accordingly. Copy of said tract map was reviewed by the City Council. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Tentative Map of Tract No. 5482 was approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. pU]3LIC .HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64~82~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 540 AND RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-90 p~ECLASSIFICAIION NO..63-64-82~ Was submitted by Victor Balderhausen requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l, property located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard approximately 400 south of Santa Ana Street (531 South Harbor Boulevard). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No.~107d; Series 1963-64, recommended reclassification to the C-O Zone subject tO the following conditions: 1. That subject property shall be developed in accordance with all pro- visions and conditions of Area Development Plan No. 2, and in accordance with all provisions of the C-O, Commercial Office, Zone, as amended, prior to the reclassification of subject property. 2. That the petitioner shall be granted temporary access to Harbor Boulevard by extending the existing driveway to the existing alley, such temporary access shall be discontinued when the alley is improved. 3. That all accessory buildings shall be removed, and the rear of the property be improved for parking purposes, prior to final building inspection. 4. That this Reclassification of subject property is contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 540. 7644 Cit3 Hal~ .Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, 1964,. 1530 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 540: Was initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider use of residential structures for commercial purposes. Property included in Reclassification No. 63-64-82 and located at 531 South Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1069, Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 540 subject to the following conditions: 1. That subject property shall be developed in accordance with all provisions of Area Deveiopment Pian No. 2, and aIi provisions of the C-O, Commerciai Office, Zone as amended. 2. That the petitioner shaii be granted temporary access to Harbor Bouievard by the extension of the existing driveway to the existing aiiey, such temporary access shaii be discontinued when the aiiey is improved. 3. That all accessory buildings shall be removed, and the rear of the property shall be improved for parking purposes, prior to final building inspection. 4. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 63-64=82. ,. R,,~C~A~I~ICATION NO, 63-64-90; Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider reclassification from R-1 to C-O Zone, properties briefly described as located on the west side of South Harbor Boulevard between Santa Ana and Water Streets. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1068, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification subject to the following condition: That subject properties shall be developed in accordance with ail provisions and conditions of Area Development Plan No. 2 and all provisions of the C-O, Commercial Office, Zone, prior to the reclassification of any individual parcel. A~.EA.D~VELOP.MENT PLAN NO. 2: The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1067, Series 1963-64, recommended adoption of Area Development Plan No. 2, outlining conditions of development pertaining to Reclassification No. 63-64-82 and No. 63~64-90 as follows: 1. That the owners of subject properties shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim the westerly five feet of said property for alley widening purposes. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana Street or Water Street, and the alley to the west, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 5. That the owners of subject properties shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Santa Aha Street, Harbor Boulevard and Water Street, for tree planting purposes. 6. That the owners of subject properties shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Harbor Boulevard for street lighting purposes. 7. That all vehicular access rights to Harbor Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 7645 C.~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California = COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. 8. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be attached as conditions of approval to any zoning petition approved for any property contained within Area Development Plan No. 2. Mro Grudzinski noted the location of subject properties and present uses in the immediate vicinit~ He summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, and called attention to Area Development Plan No. 2 recommending a 20=foot alley at the rear of subject properties. Mr. Grudzinski further advised that as result of a discussion with Mr. Robert Shanks, Superintendent of the Anaheim Elementary School District, it was learned that similar easements have been granted by the School District, therefor, it was apparent that the alley require- ment could be accomplished. Letters of approval from Mr. and Mrs. G. L. Schroeder, owner of property at 523 South Harbor Boulevard, and Mr. and Mrs. Irvin L. Himelberger, owner of property at 527 South Harbor Boulevard, were submitted and read. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said applications, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 64R-206: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-206 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C.O, property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-82, subject to the re- commendations of the City Planning Commission, and further directing said resolution to incorporate Conditions Nos. 1 to 7 outlined in Area Dev~loDment Plan No. 2, noted as Condition No. 1 of City Planning Commission's redo~nenda- tions. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (63-64-82 ~ C=O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-206, dul~ passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO. 64R-207: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R~207 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C,O, property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-90, subject to the re- commendations of the City Planning Commission, and further directing said resolution to incorporate Conditions Nos. 1 to 7 outlined in Area Development Plan No. 2, noted as Condition No. 1 of City Planning Commission's recommenda- tions, e Refer to Resolution Book. ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO 'ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-90 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN ~ Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-207, duly passed and adopted. 7646 City 8all.., Anah.gim, C~lifornia -COUNOIL MINUTES - March 24~ 1964~ 1:30 RESOLUTION NO. 64R-208: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-208 approving Area Development Plan No. 2, in accordance with City Planning Commission's recommendation. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 2. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-208, duly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERM.IT NO~ 540: City Council action on Conditional Use Permit No. 540 was ordered continued to March 31, 1964, pending proposed amendment to Section 18.38.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Coder permitting use of residential structures in C-0 Zone by Conditional Use Permit. PUBLIC HE~R~NG - RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 63-64-83 AND PROPOSED AN~ENDMENT TO GE~RAL PLAN.: Application requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, sub- .~ mt%ted by PablO V. and Laura K. Dominguez~ property briefly described - as the southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Ball Road (adjacent to service station property at the corner). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1057, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. 1056, Series 1963-64, recommended General Plan Amendment No. 9 be disapproved. Communication received March 23, 1964, from Thomas E. Heffernan, Attorney representing the applicants, requesting said public hearing be continued 30 days, was submitted and read. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, request was granted and public hearing on Reclassification No. 63-64-83 and proposed amendment to the General Plan ordered continued to 3une 23, 1964, 7:00 PoM. NDTION CARRZED. T~NTAI.IVE MA~ TRACT NO. 5471~ REVISION NO. 1: Submitted by S. V. Hunsaker Sons, Developers, filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64-83, containing 17 proposed R-3 lots, was ordered continued to June 23, 1964, 7:00 P.M., on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. N~DTION CARRIED. PUB~Iq HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-~4-8~ AND CONDITIONAL U$E PERMIT NO, 536: Submitted 'by Carl 3. Kymla, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and permission to establish a drive-in dairy products store on property briefly described as located on the south side of Crescent Avenue, approximately 142 feet west of Dale Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1075, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. 1076, Series 1963-64, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 536, and further recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 11 including subject property, in accordance with their Resolution No. 1074, Series 1963-64. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, resulting in their recommended denial° Mr. Grudzinski briefed the City Council concerning the proposed amendment to the General Plan. ,7647 .Cityi.Hall~ Anaheim~ Cal!for..nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March ,24~ 1964~ 1:30 Mayor Pro Tem Chandler invited the applicant to address the Council. Ntt. Harvey Hettinga, acting as agent, addressed the Council advising that he had obtained a petition of approval from some of the owners of property within 300 feet of subject property. Ntt. Hettinga reported on the operations of the drive-in dairy, and advised that it would be similar to one operated by him in Garden Grove. He stated the store would be opened from 9~00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M., and closed on Sunday. In his opinion the site was suitable for a dairy store and would be convenient for the residents in the area. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler called attention to the following letters of opposition filed: Taras Kozbur, Director of Planning, Buena Park. Henry Klaver - Anaheim Christian Reformed Church. Melvin Macks, 8468 Planetary Drive, Buena Park. J. D. Romanoff, 8424 Planetary Drive, Buena Park. M. E. Brumbaugh, 8484 Planetary Drive, Buena Park. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in support of the application, there being no response, invited those in opposition to address the Council. ' Mr. V. L. Peterson, 8541Kendor Drive, Buena Park, submitted and read his letter of opposition, setting forth reasons therefor. Mr. J. D. Romanoff addressed the Council in opposition to said application and presented a petition of protest purportedly containing 75 signatures. (Preamble of said petition was read hy the City Clerk). Others addressing the Council in opposition were~ Marvin Br~mhaugh, 8484 Planetary Drive, Buena Park; Joseph Di Benedetto, 8471 Dale Street, Buena Park. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone had any additional or new evidence to present, and requested a showing of hands of those present in opposition to the application. Said hearing was declared closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-209: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-209 denying Reclassification No. 63-64-86. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CiTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (6~-64-86 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILN~N~ NOES: COUNCILMENI ABSENT: COUNCILNffiN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-209 duly: passed and adopted. P~SOLUTION NO. 64R-210: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 6~R-210 sustaining the action taken hy the City Planning Commission denying Cpnditional Use Permit No. 536. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 536. 7648 Cit~ Hall,. Anah.gim, Oa~ifo~nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24, !964, .1:30 P~M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-210, duly passed and adopted. RE$OLU~ION..NO~ 64R-211: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-211, disapproving Proposed Amendment No. 11 to the General Plan in accordance with City Planning Commission's recommendation. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMEND~NT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. ll. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-211, duly passed and adopted. pUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-87: Submitted by Marion C. Henry, requesting a change of zone from R~A to C-i, property briefly described as located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Gilbert Street, (2410 West Ball Road). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1060, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 2. That subject property shall he developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit No. 1". 3. That a 3-foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Ball Road frontage and said landscaping maintained, as indicated on Exhibit No. 1 on file with the City; that plans for said landscaping shall he submitted to and approved hy the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and that said landscaping shall he installed prior to final building inspection. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting purposes; said amount to he paid at the time the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first. 5. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall he constructed along the south and west property lines except that said masonry wall on the west property line shall be stepped down to 42-inches in height within the 44.25 feet northerly of said westerly property line, prior to final building inspection. 6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall he properly shielded from view from abutting street. ~r. Mickelson noted the location of the property and existing zoning and uses in the immediate vicinity. He summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission advising that as result of Conditional Use Permit granted subject property, the applicant was instructed to file for reclassification. '7649 C%ty ~al~, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 24,. 1964, 1:30 P~M~ Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone wished to be heard in opposition to the application, there being no response, asked Mr. Henry, Applicant, if he wished to address the City Council. Mr. Henry addressed the Council concerning the requirement of a block wall along the west property line, and requested this re- quirement be amended to allow the step-down of the wall to commence at the back of the Tastee Freez building or approximately 68. feet, rather than the approximate 45 feet, thereby allowing view .of the Tastee Freez building from the west. Discussion was held and it was reported that a chain link fence existed on the boundaries of the adjacent school property. Consideration was given as to whether there was a need for a wall on the south and west property line, inasmuch as the chain link fence provided necessary protection of the school property. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was reported that a wall presently existed south of the car-wash operation on subject property. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-212: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-212, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as re- quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commissi6n, amending Condition No. 5 thereof, requiring said masonry wall be stepped- down to 42 inches in height from the rear line northerly of the rear line of the Tastee Freez building, now in existance, prior to final building inspection. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE GIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-87 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-212, dul~ passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 64R-213: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-213 for adoption. ; Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AU/HORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND MUTUAL WATER COMPANY, WITH REFERENCE TO RELOCATION OF CERTAIN IRRIGATION LINES PREPARATORY TO THE WIDENING OF KATELLA AVENUE. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: C OUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNC IIAI~N: Dutton, grein and Chandler None Schutte and Coons Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-213, duly passed and adopted. 7650 C.~tv Hall. Anaheim. Cal_ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 24. 1964. 1:30 P.M. ADJOURN~N,T~ Councilman Krein moved to adjourn to March 26, 1964,7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public and general discussion on the proposed Anaheim City Charter, as recommended hy the City Charter Committee, and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjourn- ment. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. NDTION CARRI£D. (9:30 P.M.) City Clerk