Loading...
1964/04/077669 City .Hah.l,.. Anaheim, Ca~iforni~ ~ COUNCIL MIN.UTE$ - March 31, 19~4, 1:30 P.M~ At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman ]<rein was requested to contact the Los Angeles Industrial Board of Realtors concerning the format of their organization, and upon receipt of information, schedule ~ a meeting with local Realtors for further discussion. RE$OL.U~.I.ON QF APPRECIATION: Councilman Coons offered a resolution commending Officer Sam Charles Punter of the Anaheim Police Department for his courage and bravery in action, and further expressing best wishes and success upon his retirement. Roll call vote: AYES:. COUNCILN~N: NOES: COUNCIIA~EN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons None None Mayor Coons declared the foregoing resolution unanimously adopted. AD. JOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:20 P.M.). " /Ci~ C~erk City Ha~l, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Apri~ 7, 196~, l~3Q p.~M. PRESENT: ABSENT~ PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCILMEN: meeting 2~05 P.M.). COUNCILMAN: Schutte CITY NtANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER~ 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissner. Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons (entered the Mayor Pro Tem Chandler called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held March 24 and 26, 1964, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. JOINT R~CREATION AGREE,MENT: City Attorney Joseph Geisler submitted for Council review a proposed form of agreement between the City of Anaheim, Anaheim Union High School District, Anaheim City School District and the Magnolia Elementary School District, to jointly organize, promote and conduct a program of community recreation, and advised that for some period o{ time it has been felt that this agreement should he made into a more permanent document and that the La Palma Stadium lease with the Anaheim Union High School District should he tied into the Joint Recreation Agreement. Mr. Geisler reported that the Stadium Lease originally set a four-year period in which to reimburse the city $130,000.00, and a six-year period at the rate of $10.00 per year, and that there are two years remaining in this lease. Further, at the end of this period, their right to renew the lease was rather ambiguous. 7670 C%ty Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7. 1964. 1530 In calculating the length o~ time necessary for the Anaheim Union High School District to amortize the $130,000.00, it was determined that the period of time should be 20 years instead of 10. For this reason, it was recommended that the exact use of the facility be clarified, and further recommended that at the end of the original 10 year period the term he extended an additional 10 years at a rental of $1,000.00 per year, and further providing an extension of 20 years upon the rental calculated at the then existing minimum charges for use of the facility as established h¥ resolution of the City Council, providing, however, that the additional 20 year period may he terminated by the City Council if the school district should arbitrarily withdraw from the Joint Recreation Agreement between the City and the various school districts. The inclusion of this amendment would not affect the existing Stadium Lease Agreement until the existing lease expires, or for another 12 years. ~tr. Geisler submitted an analysis made by Ntt. John Collier, Director of Parks and Recreation Department, of a proposed schedule of financial participation for the parties to the Joint agreement, based on a formula of certain tax rates and the percentage of each school district located within the City of Anaheim, rather than specific amounts. The proposed Joint Recreation would he a continuing agreement, the costs hy each participating school district to he determined according to this formula. (Mayor Coons entered the meeting, 2:05 P.M.) Mr. William Fricker, Chairman of the Anaheim Park and Recreation Commission, requested clarification of the term "arbitrary", as used in the proposed amendment to the La Palma Stadium Agreement. Mr. Geisler advised that, should there be some reason making it mandatory for one of the school districts to withdraw its participation in the Joint agreement, determination would be made on the factual situa- tion involved to be determined in each instance upon its facts as to whether it constitutes an arbitrary action. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler further advised that the intent in using the word "arbitrary" was because of possible legislative reasons why a school district could not continue, or the possibility that the tax rate would not be available to a district to continue. In such cases, in his opinion, their reasons for withdrawal from the agreement could not he considered arbitrary. However, on the other hand, he would he opposed to any withdrawal purely on a basis of clash of personality which could result in duplicate costs to the tax payers for recreational facilities. Dr. L. Kenneth Heuler, 906 Pioneer Drive, representing the Anaheim Union High School District Board, reported that the Board has studied and discussed the two proposed agreements, and were prepared to approve them at their next meeting. He further adVised that the proposed agreements presented them, in their opinion were well written and constituted a great step forward in relationship between the school hoard and the City~ however, the change whereby the two documents would he tied together is an action the Anaheim Union High School District Board has continuously maintained cannot he done, and he could give no assurance of approval of the agreement with this inclusion. Dr. Heuler advised that the Anaheim Union High School District Board would want to further review the proposed agreement as amended, and advised that the Board would meet Thursday, April 9, 1964, 7530 P.M., and they would welcome the attendance of any Councilman or other re- presentative of the City. Mr. Geisler noted that if the City Council approved the Joint Recreation as to form, the School Board could either adopt the agreement or return it with suggested amendments for further Council consideration. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Coons, - ! 7671 City Hall, Apaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7, 1964, the proposed Joint Recreation Agreement tying in the La Palma Stadium Lease Agreement as presented by the City Attorney, was approved, as to form. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Coons assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. RE.SOLUTION OF INTENT - GO.LDBN WEST BASEBALL COMPANY; Mayor Coons read a joint statement by Mr. William Phillips, Chairman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and himself~ advising that Mr. Cedric Tallis, Business Manager for the Los Angeles Angels Baseball Club, had telephoned information that a letter of intent is being prepared, and that they would probably be able to present the letter to the City Council and Board of Supervisors Thursday, April 9, 1964. Pursuant to the foregoing information, Councilman Coons moved that at the conclusion of the regular meeting this evening, the City Council adjourn to Thursday, April 9, 1964, at 2:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers~ for a joint meeting with the Orange County Board of Supervisors to receive and consider a letter of intent from the Golden West Baseball Company, and that the City Attorney, Finance Director, and the City Manager be directed to work with corresponding officials of Orange County to "'firm up" all preliminary and previous investigation on the subjects of finance, legal procedures, economics and land acquisition, in order to make a full and complete report with recommendations to both boards at the joint meeting. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Coons further stated that this will undoubtedly be the first of several joint sessions, the first being an exploratory meeting~ at which it is hoped as many details as possible can be coordinated for complete review. PROPOSED EXPANSION OF PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS: Personnel Director, Roy Heissner, reported on proposal from the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association for expansion of payroll deductions to include an accidental death insurance policy from Nationwide Insurance Co., which would be offered only to members of the Employees Association, and further advised that fifty members have contracted for this coverage as of this time. Mr. Murdoch advised that a minimum of fifty policy holders was esta- blished as a practical number to warrant consideration of expanding payroll ductions~ that the matter was brought before the City Council because the subject insurance coverage is limited to a particular group, rather than to all em- ployees. Mr. Dallas Lore~ 7153 E1Viento Way, Buena Park, Business represen- tative of the Local 47 international Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union, addressed the City Council explaining that the membership offered by the Union, includes union dues and premiums for an insurance plan offered to union members only. In his opinion, if payroll deductions were allowed for insurance offered to members of the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, they should also be allowed roi' dues and insurance premiums for members of the union. Discussion was held regarding the advisability of expanding deductions to include benefits which are offered only to limited groups of employees, noting also, that similar requests have been received from other groups, such as, the Peace Officers Association. Mr. Lore advised that the union would be willing to pay any administrative costs incurred for the deduction of their members' dues and insurance premiums, that in other cities where payroll deductions are allowed, there is usually a 3% administration cost. At the conclusion of the discussion, Mr. Heissner was instructed to re-evaluate the City's insurance program and investigate insurances offered by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, the Local International Brother- hood of Electrical Workers Union, Peace Officers Association, and other groups, for further report and recommendation to the City Council. 7672 City.. H.all., .$naheim, California -.. COUNCIL MINUTES - April CITY EMPLOYEES ~JOR MEDICAL INSURANCE - CONTRACT RENEWAL~ Council action on renewal of contract for City Employees Maj6r Medical Insurance was con- tinued from the meeting of March 31, 1964, for further information and report-from the Personnel Director pertaining to inclusion of diagnostic treatment in the Blue Cross Coverage. Nit. Heissner reported that the Blue Cross Insurance Company has agreed to include diagnostic treatment in the existing contract with the City of Anaheim, with no increase in rates; however, in order to save printing new policies by the insurance firm, and printing additional booklets, etc. by the City, making necessary an increase in cost of approxi- mately $5,000.00, any claim for diagnostic treatment benefits will be handled administratively between Blue Cross Insurance and the City. On the recommendations of the Personnel Director, Councilman K~ein moved that the contract with Blue Cross Insurance Company be renewed for a period of one year, with no raise in rates, and to include diagnostic treatment benefits. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 63-64-25. AND VARIANCE NO~ 1526; PUBLIC HEARING~ GENERAL PLAN A/~ENDMENT NO. 12 AND HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Submitted by Giacomo and Agosttna Lugaro, properties located on the east side of Magnolia Avenue approximately 658 feet and 928 feet south of Crescent Avenue. RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 6~,64~23: Requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l, northerly portion of subject property; public hearing before the City Council was held January 28, 1964, at which time the hearing was closed action being deferred to March 24, 1964, for initiation and public hearing by the City Planning Commission on proposed amendment to the General Plan, and again continued to this date to allow consideration in conjunction with City Planning Commission recommendations concerning said amendment and Variance No. 1626. PUBLIC HEARING = GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NOo 12: The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1090, Series 1963-64, recommended approval of General Plan Amendment Noo 12 in accordance with Exhibit Noo A. PUBLIC HE.ARING - HOUSE MOVING .pERMIT: Application requesting permission to move a dwelling from 532 North Magnolia Avenue to 420 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, being the southerly portion of subject property. ~ARI6NCE NO. 1626: Submitted for City Council information and consideration, requesting waiver of minimum lot area requirement, to allow relocation of an existing residence 'to the southerly portion of subject property, said R-A parcel containing less than one acre. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 16, 1964, pursuant to Resolution No. 1091, Series 1963-64, 9ranted said Variance subject to conditions. Nit. Kreidt noted the location of subject properties, the uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to Exhibit No. A, posted on the west wall of the Council Chambers, illustrating the proposed amendment to the General Plan. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations from the Building Department pertaining to the requested House Moving Permit. Mayor Coons asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to address the City Council. l~lro Robert W. MacMahon, Attorney representing the applicants, was present and advised he had nothing further to add to the evidence previously presented. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council relative to the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 12, or application for house 7673 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April.7~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. moving permit, there being no'response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R=230: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-230 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested~ property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-23~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission (refer to City Council minutes 3anuary 28, 1964, Page 7463, for recommended conditions). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63~64~23 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None $chutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-230 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 64R-231 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 12): Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-231 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 12, in accordance with Exhibit Noo A. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 12. Roi1 call vote AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-231 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 64R~232: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-232 for adoption, granting house moving permit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO GIACOMO AND AGOSTINA LUGARO TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 532 NORTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE, ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA, TO 420 NORTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE, ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA° Roll call vote AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R~232 duly passed and adopted. VARIANCE NOo 1626: No further action was taken on Variance No. 1626. PUBLIC HEARING~ HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Albert Tikker, requesting permission to move a dwelling from 2914 West Lincoln Avenue to 2830 West Orange Avenue, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations of the Building Department. Mr. /ikker indicated his presence in the audience. Mayor Coons asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 767~ City Hall, Anah~im~ Ca%ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-233: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-233 for adoption~ granting house moving permit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO ALBERT TIKKER TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 2914 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, TO 2830 WEST ORANGE AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Krein and Coons None Schutte Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R-233 duly passed and adopted. SIGN REQUESTS: Applications submitted by Michaels Markets, Inc., requesting permission to erect two free-standing signs, one to be located at 2950 West Ball Road, and one at 2230 East Lincoln Avenue, were reviewed by the City Council together with plans and reports from the Building and Planning Departments. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said sign permits were granted, as requested, subject to the provision that lighting for the sign to be located at 2230 East Lincoln Avenue be reflected away from any residential property. MOTION CARRIED. BUS~NESS LICENSE - FAIR CONVALESCENT AMBULANCE SERVICE: Reques~ dated March 14, 1964, was submitted by Robert MacDonald of Fair Convalescent Ambulance Service, for permission to obtain business license to transport non-emergency convalescent patients to and from hospitals, convalescent homes and private residences. Mr. Geisler reported that to conduct the requested service within the City requires a business license, and a Conditional Use Permit to operate the service from a specific location; no other permit nor Council Action would be required. The Mayor asked if the applicant was present. There was no response, On the recommendations of the City Attorney, the City Council directed the City Treasurer to advise the applicant of the proper pro- cedure to obtain a business license. REQUEST - /LMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE: Request dated March 16, 1964, from Anaheim Foundry Company, for amendment to the business license ordinance, Section 3.16.030, pertaining to firms with no fixed place of business within the City making delivery of goods or merchandise by vehicles, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Cecil M. Sills, 125 West Commercial Street, Vice President of Anaheim Foundry Company, addressed the Council requesting that said ordinance be amended to exclude trucks operating under intrastate and interstate commerce. Mr. Geisler advised that a provision in the present ordinance excludes from the business license requirement trucks exclusively in interstate commerce; further, deliveries occasional (less often than once per month) and incidental to business conducted elsewhere do not require City licensing, and if evidence of qualification is presented to the City Managers Office, the business would be so exempted. - ! 7675 City Hall~ Anaheim, California = GOUNCI~ MINUTES ~ April 7, 1~64~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Sills further explained the nature of his company's business, advising that they purchase materials from locations both inside and outside of the State of California; and further advised if the ordinance was strictly enforced their company would be put in a com- petitive disadvantage. Mr. Nathan Benson, representing the Purdy Company of Long Beach, advised of his company"s experience in making shipments of materials to other cities. He further advised that the Anaheim Foundry Co. requires materials delivered both interstate and intrastate, and felt it was in- equitable to require a business license from out=or-town firms making deliveries when others are exempt. Mr° Benson requested the present ordinance be reviewed, and con- sideration given to excluding from the ordinance those businesses engaged in manufacturing or melting of materials and the use of raw materials in manufacturing finished goods. Mr. Geisler reported that truckers who are licensed by the Railroad Commission, or the Public Utilities Commission are exempt from City licensing only when deliveries are occasional and incidental to businesses conducted elsewhere and are not entirely exempt from licensing by cities. And further reported that the administrative staff was presently analysing the licensing provisions for possible relief to Anaheim industries. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that any proposed readjust- ment in licensing procedures for industries, if determined can be legally accomplished,should be for the benefit and protection of Anaheim industries. At the conclusion of the discussion, the testimony presented failing to show said license tax to be descriminatory or unfair, Councilman Dutton moved said request for amendment to the business license ordinance be denied. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM .CHAMBER OF CO~9~ERCE ,RECO~ENDATION = M=i, ZONING (COUNTY CASE 778 ,AND RF. CLA$SIFIGAIION NO. 63=64~83: Communication dated March 23, 1964, was submitted from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, requesting that the City Council con- tact the Orange County Planning Commission reaffirming its stand to main- rain M~i Zoning in the area included under County Case No. 778; and further requesting that the City Council uphold action of the City Planning Commission recommending that Reclassification No. 63=64=83 be denied (requesting M-1 Zoning be reclassified to R=3, property located at the southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Ball Road, public hearing before the City Council continued to June 23, 1964.) Mr. George E. Strachan, General Manager of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council advising that another Orange County Planning Commission hearing has come to his attention relating to the northeast industrial area. He was of the opinion that the City Council should reiterate its position on Mol Zoning in the northeast and south- east industrial areas, and he reported that the Chamber of Commerce has also directed a letter to the Orange County Planning Commission. Councilman Chandler moved that the City Council reiterate the policy of maintaining the northeast and the southeast areas for industrial use, and refer to former missive to the Orange County Planning Commission. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 7676 City Hall, Anahetm,.California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7~ 1964, !:30 P~M. _ RECESS'; Councilman Chandler moved for a 15 minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.) AFTER ~ECgS~: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. TENIAT~VE~MAP, TRACT NO, 5521 (RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-64-~1 AND CONDITIONAL USE PE~RMIT NO. ~41)~ Developer, D. and M. Development Company~ tract located on the south side of Ball Road approximately 666 feet west of Magnolia Avenue, containing 70 proposed R-3 lots. Pursuant to request by the petitioner, Councilman Chandler moved that Council consideration of Tentative Tract No. 5521 be continued, in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64=91 and Conditional Use Permit No. 541. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. T.ENTATIyE MAP~ TRACT NOo 5556 (VARIANCE NO. 1631): Developer, Avalon Savings and Loan Association; tract located on the north side of Orange Avenue, east of Gain Street, and contains 18 proposed R-1 lots. Pursuant to request by the petitioner, Councilman Chandler moved that Council consideration of Tentative Tract No. 5556 be continued, in conjunction with Variance No. 1631. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION.ITEMS: Action taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 16, 1964, pertaining to the following ap- plications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDII~ONA~ USE PHRMII NO. 544.: Submitted by Elbert L. and Lida Smith, requesting permission to establish an 82-unit two-story motel in con- junction with a family restaurant, R-A property located at the south- east corner of Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1095, Series 1963-64, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. QgNDIT!ONA. L uSE, PERMIT NO~ 548: Submitted by the Central Baptist Church of Orange County, requesting permission to use the presently existing sanitarium building for private educational facilities in conjunction with existing Baptist Church, R~A property located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue, approximately 288 feet north of Lincoln Avenue (201 North Magnolia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1096, Series 1963-64, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. V~RI6~E. NO. 1~25: Submitted by Lusk Corporation, requesting waiver of minimum lot width to establish one lot in Tentative Tract No. 5499 with a 15-foot frontage at the building setback line, R-1 property located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Nohl Canyon Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1092, Series 1963-64, granted said Variance subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered Conditional Use Permits and Variance application. TENTATIVE ~AP, TRACT NO. 5499, REVISION NO. 1 (VARIANCE NO.. 1625): Developer, Lusk Corporation~ tract located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue and west side of Nohl Canyon Road, and contains 36 R-1 lots (continued from the meeting of ~arch 24, 1964, in conjunction with Variance No. 1625). The City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 16, 1964, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 7677 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7, .1964, 1:30 p~M~ _ 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the average lot size shall be 107000 square feet, with no lot less than 8,000 square feet, and that the pad size shall be not less than 7,000 square feet. 3. That the area within the City of Anaheim contributing to the drainage district in the City of Orange, shall be responsible for the drainage charge, which shall be paid prior to approval of the final tract map. 4. That the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Final tract map, 5. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5499 is granted subject to the approval of Variance No. 1625. Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5499, Revision No. 1, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CQNDITIONAL USE PERMI.T NO~ 542: Submitted by The Town Church Assembly of God of Anaheim~ requesting permission to establish additional education facilities in the Sunday School Department~ and for future use of a Day School~ R-A property located on the north side of Broadway, approximately 643 feet west of Euclid Avenue (1759 West Broadway). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1093, Series 1963-64, granted said Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. Reverend Dorman N. Buttram, Pastor of The Town Church, addressed the Council requesting an extension of time to Condition No. 5 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1093, Series 1963-64, requiring 6-foot masonry wall construction along the north property line prior to final building inspection. He explained that their construction program is planned to be accomplished over a two year period of time; further, there presently exists a 6-foot solid redwood fence separating subject property from the residential area to the north. In addition, Reverend Buttram requested clarification of Condition No. 1 requiring street lighting charges. Mr. Murdoch read contents of a letter from G.D. Buccola Investment Co., dated February 16, 1960, setting forth charges for street improvements in Tract No. 3562, west of subject property; and further read memorandum dated April 7, 1964, from the City Electrical Division with reference to street lighting charges on subject property. Mr. Geisler noted than when the church use was established on /he property, no zoning action was required; however since that time a conditlonal use permit is required for a church or any expansion to the existing facility. In connection with Tract No. 3562, the church paid for street tmprovements~ subject property being designated as "not a part" of said tract, however they did not pay for street lighting in front of the church property. Mr. Murdoch reported that the Electrical Division has advised that street lights can be installed immediately upon receipt of the payment. Further discussion was held, and it was noted that no one appeared before the City Planning Commission in opposition to the requested Conditional Use Permit. Councilman Chandler moved that one year extension of time be granted for masonry wall construction requirement under Conditional Use Permit No. 542, subject to the posting of a $1,000 surety bond, prior to final building inspec- tion. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. The City Planning Commission action on Conditional Use Permit No. 542 was reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-234 - JOB NO. 4808: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-234 for adoption. 7678 CitY H~ll,.%nahei~, California - COUNCIL MINUIE.$ - April 7., 1~6.4, 1:.30 PtM~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENI, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE, FROM LINCOLN AVENUE TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS APPROXI- MATELY 155 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 4808. (Copp Paving Co., Inc.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-234 duly passed and adopted. RE. SQLU~..I.ON ~0, .~R-235 r AWARp. OF JOB NO, 761-A: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-235 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CON- S/RUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVE- MENT OF ADAMS STREET, FROM APPROXIMATELY 302 FEET SOUTH OF MANCHESTER AVENUE TO APPROXIMAIELY 452 FEET SOUTH OF MANCHESTER AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 761-A; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONMTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 30, 1964, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call 'vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMHN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-235 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-236 - JOB NO, 852: Councilman Kretn offered Resolution No. 64R-236 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE /~HE CON- STRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVE- MENT OF WEBSTER STREET, FROM ORANGE AVENUE TO BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 852; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 23, 1964, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons None Schutte Ih.e Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-236 duly passed and adopted. 7679 City Hall., Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7, ~954, 1:30 RENEWAL - cO~9~ERCIA.L TRASH CONTRACT: In accordance with recommendations o{ Ntt. Thorton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein moved that the Commercial Trash Contract With the Anaheim Disposal Company be extended four (4) years from its present termination date under the same terms and conditions, with a further provision that in the event a trash transfer sta- tion is constructed in the southeastern portion of the city, the payment to the contractor be renegotiated, and the City Attorney be authorized to pre- pare necessary documents modifying said contract accordingly. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 64R~237: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-237 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF, REAL PROPERTY FOR CIVIC CONVENTION CENTER PURPOSES. (Schroeder Property - Civic Convention Center - 20 acres) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILNtEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCIL~N: None ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R~237 duly passed and adopted, SAL~ OF EQUI.PMENTI The City Manager reported on sealed bids received for purchase of four used vehicles from the City of Anaheim, and recommended acceptance of the high bids, as follows: Car No. 74 = 1948 Plymouth Coupe Car No. 66 = 1946 Plymouth Coupe Car No. 69 - 1954 Dodge 4=Door Car No. 78 ~ 1951 Plymouth 4- Door $75~00 ~ Virgil Wills 37.00 - Michael Boyd 21.50 ~ Dick Kamphefner 35.00 - Dan Rodriguez On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that sale of used vehicles to the respective high bids be authorized. Council- man Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORANG E COUNTy.WATER DISTRICT RESOLUIION: Resolution of the Orange County Water District endorsing Assembly Bill No. 17 which embodies the principles re- garding the California Water Fund and State Water Financing as presented to the Senate Fact=Finding Committee on Natural Resources~ previously approved by said County Water District, was continued to April 21, 1964, approximately 3:00 P.Mo, pending additional information and report from Anaheim's representa- tive to the Orange County Water District and Metropolitan Water District. STATE~NI~ METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT: Statement of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California pertaining to Secretary of Interior Udall's Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan, opposing said plan and urging support in opposition there to, was continued to April 21, 1964, approximately 3:00 P.Mo, pending additional information from the City's representative to the Orange County Water District and Metropolitan Water District. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 64R-238 to 64R-2~4, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 64R=238: A RESOLUIION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UIILITY PURPOSES. (John F. and Marianne L. Murphy) RESOLLrIION NO~ 64R-239: A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEDtENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Carl H. and Heien L. Lindgren) 7680 ~ity H~ll._~..Anaheigl Ca. li.fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES .- A.pri.1 7, 1964~. l:30. P~M. R~SOLLrrION NO~ 64R-240~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASE~AENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Chlell L. and Genevieve B. Pharris) 8E$OLU~ION NO, 64R-241: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANI DEED CONVEYING TO THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN £ASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Stephen £. and Stella C. Roach) Rg~O~UTION .NOn, 6~R-242: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Minnie Eo Ehrle) R~$p~uTION NO. 64R,243~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIJ ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Jay C. and Wanda Lee Stankey) R.ESOLU][ION NO,.64R-244~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND POWER LINE OVERHANG PURPOSES. (Edward F. and Mildred I. Escalle) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCIIJ~N: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Schutte The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-238 to 64R-244, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED~ (a) Letter from Paul L. Hayes, Civil Defense Coordinator, recommending that a Certificate of Appreciation be awarded to Miss Eva Carlill, R.N., for service in connection with the Medical Self-Help Training Program. Councilman Chandler moved that a Certificate of Appreciation be prepared and forwarded to Miss Carlill. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. <b> A Resolution of the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Parks Conference co~mending the City of Anaheim, the Mayor and City Council, the Park and Recreation Commission,.and the Park and Recreation Director and staff. (c) Letter from William Gallienne, Chairman of the Orange County Diamond 3ubilee Committee, suggesting participation in the Orange Couniy Fair from 3uly 14 through 3uly 19, 1964. Ntt. Murdoch reported that for some time the City of Anaheim has participated in the Orange County Fair, at an approximate cost of $500.00 each year. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Council authorized a booth display or exhibit at the Orange County Fair, July 14 through 19, 1964, in conjunction with the Orange County Diamond Jubilee celebration, and that a letter be forwarded to Ntt. William Gallienne so advise him. MOTION CARRIED. 7681 City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7~. 1964~ 1~30 P.M. (d) Resolution of the City of Dairyland concerning more efficient use of school sites. (e) Minutes of the Anaheim Park and Recreation Commission meeting on March 12, 1964. (f) Correspondence from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce requesting Council consideration of a suitable method of identifying voters on election day, in order to stimulate and increase the percentage of voter participation in elections, and suggesting that each polling place be provided with common pins to allow voters to pin their ballot receipts to their clothing, indicating that they have voted. Discussion was held between the City Council, City Attorney and City Clerk. Attention was called to the provision of the Elections Code regulating the removal of the ballot number. At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Krein, the Chamber of Commerce was advised that so far as can be determined the City can not legally permit election officers to perform this service, and in addition because of the press of time, at different times, at %he polls, voting could be delayed. However, the City supports the idea, and approves of supplying pins and placards at appropriate places at the polls, containing a legend requesting the voter to pin their ballot receipt to their clothing. GoUnctlman'Kr~in seconded the motion. MOTION C~RRIED. RECESS: ~Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P.M., Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° 5:00 P.Mo AFTER REQESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCIIA~EN: None. ASSISTANT CITY Nt~NAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Den, M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson. INVOCATION: Reverend Lawson, of the Mount Calvary Lutheran Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayo~ Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-69: Submitted by Marguerite Feraud, et al, Owner; and Santa Anita Investments Incorporated, Agent: requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 on Portion A, and R-3 on Portion B; pro- perty located at the southeast corner of Euclid Street and Palm Lane. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1078, Series 1963-64, recommended that the requested reclassification of Portion B be denied, and that Portion A be reclassified to the C-O Zone~ subject to the following conditions: That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Euclid Street, for street widening purposes. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Euclid Street and Palm Lane, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 7682 City Ha~l, ~pahe%m, California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7. %~, I:30 3. That the existing palm trees shall be lowered, if in the opinion of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent, the trees have been danger- ously undercut by the construction of the required improvements. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Palm Lane and Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Euclid Street, for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date thereof, whichever occurs first. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with. approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That Portion "A" of subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim~ marked Exhibit No. 1, and with all provisions of the C-O, Commercial Office, Zone. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to the findings of the Commission resulting in the foregoing recommended conditions. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to address the City Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants, reported that revised plans were submitted to the City Planning Com- mission, eliminating 29 units on original plans for the requested multiple family use on Portion B of subject property, and respecting the 150 feet limitation with a density of 22 units per gross acre. Density of other developments in the immediate area was noted, and Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that the requested density was justi- fied because of the subterranean parking which provides more open space area. He called attention to the quality of the units and further advised that the area was most suited for R~3 development and least suited for R-1. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in support of the proposed reclassification, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to offer opposition. Mr. Richard B. Jackson, Attorney and Owner of property adjacent to the south~ stated that the additional plans presented to the Planning Commission did not comply with the Commission"s suggestions when request-' lng revision of plans. He noted the existing and proposed uses in the area, and felt that the C=i Zoning requested (Portion A), if granted, could allow less desirable commercial establishments and that children living in the neighborhood must pass this property in route to the elementary school. Mr. Jackson called attention to the quality of the nearby homes and was of the opinion that there was a real need for additional homes of quality in this area. He felt there should be a defining line between R-3 and R-1 Zoning, and noted that existing apartments have been confined to the north side of Palm Lane. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Jackson stated that the subject area would not be compatible for apartments or for C-1 Zoning, and he felt that there should be some plan or design for develop- ment so that children will not have to pass by liquor stores, etc., to reach the school and the proposed Branch Library. He failed to see any need for additional R-3 Zoning, as in a survey of apartments to the north conducted by interested property owners, a 25% vacancy factor was revealed; further, the survey indicated 29 children residing in the 27 existing units 7683 City Hall~ An.qheim~ Californi~ - COUNCIL MINIrrES - April. 71 .1964~ 1:30 which allow children, and it was his understanding that each class in the elementary school on Palm Lane was presently over capacity by 8 children. In answer to Councilman Chandler's question~ Mr. Jackson advised that the survey included all apartments on Loara Street from Ball Road, south. In addition, he was of the opinion that C-O Zoning on Portion A would be more compatible than C-1 Zoning in that C-0 would not create as great traffic hazard or litter problem to the area~ however, the requested R-3 and C-1 would not be compatible with development in the area. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Dr. Richard Katz, 1655 Palais Road, addressed the City Council re- questing that all those present in the Council Chambers for the purpose of opposing Reclassification No. 63-64-69, indicate their presence by standing. Mr. Knisely, in rebuttal, stated he failed to see that a traffic problem would be created by the requested user further, the feasibility of R-1 development of Portion B would be questionable because of the high cost of the land in the area. Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that apartments should not be constructed immediately adjacent to homes of high quality. Councilman Krein stated there is a need for additional fine homes in the city, and he felt the area in question was an ideal location for a continuation of homes comparable to those already existing, and that Palm Lane would be a logical boundary between R=3 and R-1 Zoning. He was of the opinion that the C=0 Zoning on Euclid, as recommended by the City Planning Commission would be compatible. It was noted that six homes would be adjacent to the south of the proposed apartments, and Councilman Chandler called attention to the Anaheim Municipal Code provision that no multiple story apartment units may be con- structed within 150 feet of R=i property; and was of the opinion that no dif- ference would be served if Parcel B was limited to R-1 as it would be placing R-1 development against an R=3 development north of Palm Lane for an approxi- mately one-half that distance to the south. Mayor Coons noted the Junior High School site and Public Park site adjacent to the Elementary School on Palm Lane~ and advised that school sites are actually R-3 Zones, and at one time considered an allowable use in an R-3 Zone. To require R=I Zone on Parcel B would in effect be placing an RI1 use between a CmO and R=3 Zone. Councilman Krein referred to the General Map, noting that R-1 use is shown north and west of the Loara High School site. Councilman Dutton, in reviewing the plans, noted that the R-3 de- velopment proposed on Parcel B would be 150 feet distant from the R-1 de- velopment, and that patios are planned to back up to the northern boundary of the six residential properties adjacent %o subject property at the south. RESOLUTION: Councilman Schutte offered a resolution sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission~ approving C~0 Zoning on Portion A~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commision, and denying R-3 Zoning of Portion B. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Coons declared the foregoing resolution failed to carry. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-245: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-245 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone of subject property as follows: Portion A - C-O Zone, subject to the 7684 City Hall. Anaheim. Cali~q~qia ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7,.1964. 1~30 P,~. the recommendations of the City Planning Commission; Portion B - R-3 Zone, subject to the following conditions: e 5~ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final buildin9 inspection. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to final building inspection. That the existing palm trees shall be lowered, if in the opinion of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent, the trees have been danger- ously undercut by the construction of the required improvements. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder; or in the alternative, if it is determined a final tract map is not necessary, the following conditions be required: (a) That the dedicated street as shown on the revised plot plan, shall be knuckled and extended easterly and terminated in a cul-de-sac. (This shall be a standard street with the excep- tion that sidewalks may be eliminated from the westerly park- way.) If the street is not extended easterly, a 20-foot dedicated alley shall be provided around the perimeter of the subject property with an additional one-foot strip for the construction of a masonry wall. (b) That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineer- ing requirements of the City of Anaheim along Palm Lane and the newly dedicated street (and alley)~ such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. (c) That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Palm Lane and the newly dedicated street for street lighting purposes. (d) That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 3=foot overhang easement along the southerly boundary of subject property. (e) That Conditions a, b, c, and d, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot alon9 the newly dedicated street, for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid within a period of 180 days from date hereof. 7. That Condition Nos. 4 and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5, as approved by the City Council this date, and signed by the ~ayor. 9. Parking to be provided in accordance with provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 10. That Euclid Avenue and Palm Lane frontages of subject property shall be landscaped and maintained as indicated on Exhibit No. 1, on file with the City, that plans shall be submitted to and subject to approval by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspection. 7685 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCI. L M!~U/ES - April Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHHIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RE- LATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AN~NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64~69 - C-O & R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Coons declared Resolution No. 64R-245 duly passed and adopted. Plans marked Exhibits 1 through 5 dated this date and signed by Mayor Coons. (Councilman Krein left the meeting, 7:42 P.M.) (Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 7:45 P.M.) PUBLIC ~$ARING ~ RECLASSIFICATION NO., 63-64~79, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ. 534 .AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDN~NT NO~ 8: Submitted by Rawlins Investment Corporation and Robert and Mary D. Newton, Owners, requesting change of zone from R=A to M-1 and permission to establish an auto paint shop with incidental body work; property briefly described as having frontages on Mountain View, Katella and Manchester Avenues. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 1081 and 1082, Series 1963=64~ recommended that Reclassification No. 63-64-79 and General Plan Amendment No. 8 be denied; and pursuant to Resolution No. 1083, Series 1963=64, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 534. Ntt. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, calling attention to their findings. He noted that revised plans were requested by the City. Planning Commission in an answer to proposed traffic circulation on the property, and called attention to the General Plan Amendment which was posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, noting that the General Plan for the area in question projects basically medium density residential use. Mayor Coons asked if if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to address the City Council. Mr. Stanley Rosen, 318 West Lincoln Avenue, Attorney representing the applicant, advised that revised plans for the proposed Earl $cheib Auto Paint Shop were submitted to the Planning Commission, in accordance with the Commission"s recommendations; the petitioner agrees to restriCt access drives to one on Manchester Avenue and one on Mountain View Avenue. He was of the opinion that because of the way subject property is located, the land on Manchester cannot effectively be used without including that which fronts on Mountain View. Regarding traffic, Mr. Rosen noted that Mountain View Avenue dead-ends at the trailer park to the south. He further advised that plans are for cement block construction with landscaping, and this would be the only installation by the nation-wide company contained within block walls. In addition, he stressed that all work would be done on the premises and would be restricted to auto painting and light body work. Mr. Rosen submitted for Council review~ photographs illustrat- ing similar installations, one in Beverly Hills adjoining apartment construction and near other apartments and offices, the other a newer facility in Glendale, with a motel across the street. He advised that no objections or complaints have been received at either facility pertaining to odors~ noise, etco 7686 City HAll~ Apaheim~ Californ. ia - COUNCI.L.MINUIES - April 7~ 1~64, 1.:30 ~.M. Mr. Charles McHugh, 2870 Coolidge, explained the operation of the "water-washed" spray paint booth which would be used on the premises, noting that no odors would emanate from the operation. He explained that the appearance of the building would be well-maintained, in accordance with the company"s national reputation. Mr. Gariglio, Regional Supervisor for Earl Scheib Auto Painting, advised that the operation would be contained wholly within the building, that the only automobiles parked outside would be thdse owned by employees or waiting to be processed. He explained their one-day service feature and the business hours which would be kept, and further noted that they did not specialize in insurance work which would entail keeping cars on the premises for a period of time while awaiting insurance adjustments. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in supportof the application, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to offer opposition. Faith Wittner, owner of property directly across from subject property, advised that the plans for the proposed business would not be compatible due to the shape and geographical location of the property. She was of the opinion that a traffic problem will be caused by the close proximity of access drives to Mountain View and Katella Avenues, and that the property could be developed with some type of modern manufacturing operation or commercial development, and gave as an example the Cannon Electric Company. Miss Wittner further advised that the type of business in question would be incompatible with the densely developed area, and would depreciate the value of her property. In answer to Councilman Dutton"s question, Miss Wittner stated that she was protesting the type of development proposed, because in her opinion the area was in a transitional stage, and could attract higher type developments similar to existing commercial developments. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Malter, co-owner of property at 1833 and 1839 Mountain View Avenue, addressed the Council in support of the M-1 Zoning, being of the opinion that the requested use would be in accordance with existing development in the area, and that properties on Mountain View Avenue are no longer desirable for residential use. In rebuttal, Mr. Rosen pointed out that there would be no odors from the paint shop and that no traffic problem would be antici- pated since Mountain View Avenue is a dead-end street. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held and Councilman Chandler noted that Katella Avenue was one of the main routes to Disneyland, and nearly all de- velopment in the subject area has been of the light or medium commercial nature. Mayor Coons was of the opinion that, in time, a higher degree of commercial development will follow the pattern established on pro- perties west of subject property. Pictures of other facilities were returned to Mr. Rosen on authorization of the City Council. R~SOLUTIO~ NO. 64R-246: Councilman Dutton felt that the proposed M-1 use would be too heavy for subject location noting commercial nature of the area; and thereupon offered Resolution No. 64R-246 for adoption, concurring with recommendations of the City Planning Commission, denying Reclassification No. 63-64-79. Refer to Resolution Book. 7687 City H~i~, Anaheim,. California - COUNCI.L MINUTE~ - April 7, .~964, 1:30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (63-64-79)~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCII3~N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILAiEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-246 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO..~ 6~R-247: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-247 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 534. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 534. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-247 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-248: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-248 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 8. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-248 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOn 64R-24~.: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-249 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF. A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 1964, FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SAID CITY OF A CERTAIN PROPOSAL RELATING TO THE ADOPTION OF A CHARTER FOR SAID CITY, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION WITH THE STATE-WIDE DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-249 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTI.QN NQ, 64R-250: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-250 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 7688 .City H~%, ~oahgim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES .r April.7, ~$4, %;3Q P,M, RESOLLrrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MENtBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY ~EASURE. (City Charter) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL~N: NOES: COUNCIL~N: ABSENT: COUNCILN[EN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-250 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO, 1~82: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1982 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANtENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.38, SECTIONS 18.38.020 AND 18.38.040 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ZONING. (Residential structures in C-O Zone by Conditional Use Permit) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1982 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance he waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1982 duly passed and adopted. 9RDINANCE NO. 1983: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1983 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.04, SECTION 18.04.030, PARAGRAPH (b) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ZONING. (Parking requirements - restaurants) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1983 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: CObqqC ILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1983 duly passed and adopted. QRD!.NANC£ NQ~ 1984: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1984 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.52, SECTION 18.52.060, PARAGRAPH (2), SUB-PARAGRAPHS (a), (b) and (c) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ZONING. (Site Development Standards, M-1 Zone) 7689 City ~all~ ~Dahei~, C~lifornia .-. ~O.U~..!L MINUIES - ~pri! .~. 1964 After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1984 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIIAI~N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1984 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-251~. CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT NO, ~40: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-251, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 540~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission (Refer to Minute Page No. 7644, March 24, 1964). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLIIrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 540. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILN~N: NOES: COUNCILN~N: ABSEN/: COUNCILN~N: Dutton, Chandler and Coons None Schutte and Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-251 duly passed and adopted. ALGOHQ~IC BEVERAGE LICENSE APP. L!C6TIpN.~ Application submitted by Daniel Julian Allec, for New Off~=Sale Beer and Wine License at Allec*s Market, 2004 East Lincoln Avenue (R~A Zone, existing non=conforming C-1 use), was presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their information. No Council action was taken on said application. A.LGOHO~IC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPklCATION: Application submitted by Loren E. Wagner, President, for special On=Sale General License, for the Tamasha Town and Country Club, 1025 South Los Angeles Street (C=I Zone)~ was presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their information. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney, and it was noted that the special license applied for would limit the sale of alcoholic beverages to members of the private club only. At the conclusion of the discussion it was determined by the City Council that the applicant for said special license be instructed to file conditional use permit application with the City of Anaheim, if the Tamasha /own and Country Club is to become a private club. No Council action was taken on the foregoing alcoholic beverage license application. R~SOLUTION NO. 64R-252: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-252 for adoption, subject to an agreement from Mr. Leo Freedman to, at his expense, relocate irrigation pipe lines; prepare necessary street improvement plans and install curbs, gutters, pavement, sidewalks and landscaping; install driveway openings and aprons and chain link fencing as required in Section 9 of said easements~ and further subject to it being understood that acceptance of said easements will in no way predetermine any action on requested abandonment of Alro Avenue or Clementine Street. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A ROAD EASEMENT CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES. (Southern California Edison Company - Leo Freedman) 7690 City. .Hall,. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 7, 1~64, 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Coons NOES: COUNCII~N: None ABSENT: COUNGII3~EN: Schutte and Krein ABSTAINED: COUNCII3~AN: Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-252 duly passed and adopted. ~ETT.ER OF AP~REQ!A.I!ON: The City Clerk read communication dated April 7, 1964, from Ntt. and Mrs. Sam C. Punter expressing appreciation for the recognition extended by the City Council. INTR~DU~TIpN: Mayor Coons introduced a number of young people in the audience from the Fuller%on 3unior College Department of Political Science. qE.NERAL..pOUG~AS Mac ARTHUR: Receiving the sad news of the death of General Douglas Mac Arthur, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Council- man Dutton~ a telegram was authorized to be sent to the family of the General offering condolences from the City of Anaheim~ and the City Attorney was requested to prepare a resolution of tribute for his out- standing accomplishments and service to our country. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED ADDITION TO RECREATIONAL PROGR~: Discussion was held concerning the Crill Pit, located on the South side of Anaheim Road (Mtraloma Avenue). Councilman Coons moved that the City Manager contact Mr. Howard Crooke, of the Orange County Water District, for the purpose of negotiating equitable arrangements to incorporate the Cfi11 Pit in the total recreational program, tt being understood that the use thereof would not be 11mlted solely to Anaheim residents, so that at the time excavation of the pit is completed, there will be plans to utilize the area as a recreational facility. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJO.~RN~ENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn to April 9, 1964, 2:00 for the purpose of a joint session with the Orange County Board of Super- visors to further consider a joint venture in financing and possible lease of stadium facilities by the Golden West Baseball Company, and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 9:15 P.M. - ~City Clerk