1964/04/217714
City
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.'
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler.
CITY MANAGER: Ketth A. Murdoch.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Grudziflski.
Mayor Goons called the meeting to order and announced that
this was the time and place fixed for the canvass of the returns of
the General Municipal Election held April 14, 1964~ and appointed the
following Canvassing Board:
Inspector: Councilman Dutton.
3udge: Councilman Krein.
Clerk: Councilman Schutte.
Clerk: Councilman Coons.
The tally list of each election precinct was compared and the
number of votes cast for each candidate was noted and recorded.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-266: At the conclusion of the canvass of the votes
cas~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-266 for passage and
adoption, declaring the results of the General Municipal Election held
on ~pril 14~ 1964.
Refer to Resolution Book.
7715
City Hall, Anahei.m; California - COUNCIL ~INUTES - April 21; 1964; 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-266
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF
THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID
CITY OF ANAHEIM ON THE 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1964,
DECLARING THE RESULT IHEREOF AND SUCH OTHER
NL~TTER$ AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW°
WHEREAS, a regular general municipal election was held and Conducted
in the City of Anaheim, County of Oran§e, State of California, on Tuesday,
the 14th day of April, 1964, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly given
in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were
properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in
all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes cast thereat,
received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and
manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of
California for the holding of elections in general law cities; and
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of April, 1964, at the hour of 1:30
the City Council duly assembled at its usual place of meeting and has
canvassed the returns of said election and as a result of which, the City
Council finds that the number of votes cast and the names of the persons
voted for, the office each person was voted for, and other matters re=
quired by law to be as stated hereinafter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY cOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
DOES RESOLVE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS~
SECTION 1o That there were one hundred two voting precincts estab-
lished for the purpose of holding said election consisting of consolidations
of the regular election precincts in the City of Anaheim as established for
the holding of state and county elections°
SECTION 2o That said regular general municipal election was
held for the purpose of electing the followin~ officers of said City as re-
quired by the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California,
to wit:
Two members of the City Council of said City for the full
term of four years;
A City Clerk of said City for the full term of four years;
A City Treasurer of said City for the full term of four years;
SECTION 3o That the whole number of votes cast in the City, the
names of the persons voted for, the offices for which each person was voted
for, the number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and the
number of votes given in the City for each person, are as shown upon the
following schedule:
7716
Cit_y.._Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April ~1, !964~ 1:30 P.M.
GENERAL N~ff4ICIPAL ELECTION - APRIL 14, 1964
CITY COUNCIL CITY CITY
I
-, ,
DATED ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z
~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ VOTED
PRECINCT
Absen%ee
Vo%e 35
~ 2~ 79 79! 92
1
2 53 12 19 2 3~ 40 18] 7 50 4 9~ 95 113
~ 10~ 29~ 93 91 105
3 51 16 , 20 3 6~ 48 27,
4 84 58 : 39 10 4 ~ 76 92~ 16 50 . 177 177 223
5 58 24 25: 0 ~ 1 ~ 52 33~ 15 33: 98 2 95 2 123
6 38 13 25 2 3 46 14. 10~ 20~ 84! 83 88
8 58 72 31 i i 13 72~ 80 21 45 5" 168 209
9 55 13 ; 27; 5~ 8' 37~ 58. 11~ 39~ 107~ ..106 138
{ ,
10 63 37 ; 38~ 4~ 7 : 50 74; 22~ 51[ 1 ~; 142 143 178
:' 11 59~ 7 ~ 50', 2 4 : 81 3~ 30 26~ ,,' 122 122 140
12 93~ 16 ~ 66~ 2; 9 i 102~ 12~ 28" 64 ~ 180~ 175 2 203
, ' ' i 51~ 213~ 211 244
13 122~ 19
14 105~ 12 ~ 67 5 2 I 102~ 21~ 27i 54 ~ ,1701 167 ~01
15 73~ 17 ,, 38~__ 6 ~, 9!' 86~, 12~ 18~ 15 ~ 3 134~ 130 1 161
' ~ 77 22 55' 1, 146 141 165
17 87~ 17 36~ 2~ 7 ~; 20
18 73~ 15,~ 53'~ 3 ~ 0 i 93[. 40~ 18 47 , 141~ 142 171
19 73~ 10, 32; 1~ 3 70~ 16 13 30 3 [ 104i ~ 103 128
20 63, 9 i 17; ,5~ 5 32:~ 3; 12 59 ~ 97~ i 91 114
21 601 11 28; 3~ 4 ,~ 77; 7 19 32 ~: 114, {. 113~ 125
22 67~ 9 '21 7~ 2 77~ 14~ 18 37 2 [; 113~ I 112 130
23 64 ~ 8 19" 14~ 5 80~. 22j 18..28 2 ;; 113~ ~ 112 142
~ . 24 66~82~ 13 ~8 ._77~1 7 , 71~ 13~ 11, 25 2 110~t 108 1 125
25 12 18 ~, 4 106 5 16 39 100 ~. , 10,1 147
27 67 6 20 4 ~ 2 631 5i 12 21 , 91~ 3~. 87 2 102
28 58 25 18 13 ~ 1 ~ 481 4 9; 24 , ~: 86~,. ~ 86 100
29 132~ 18 43 10 i 3~ 159 18 17~ 78 1 ~ 214~ 212 249
30 38 t 11 -~19. 4 ' 3 29 8 9 ' 20 ; ., 62j ]~ . 63 73
31 135 15 50 ? 6 ~ 157, 61 22' 52~[ 206~ 187 233
32 107 3 .43, 7 3 ~ 139[ 15 28, 43 ; 6 j~ 169~, 166 201
3~ 70 6 52 9 2 . 85~ 9 9 36 , 126 ~ 126 169
34 82.,~ 9 30 5 10 : 127~ 9 21 '. 61 i 3 141 ~ 1 137 1 178
35 90 ' 12 54~ 9 4 ~ 166' 11 22 ~ 69 : 195[ " ,, 192 231
~ 54 31 28~ 2 1 ~ 50 30 17 20 ~ 2 104 - 103 120
37 60 , 8 13, 3 1 64 6 19 27 i 88 [. 88 105
38 10 ' 5 4 0 i 1 15 6 3 15 ~ 26 I 26 33
39 97 S 43 3 6 130 9 31 47 I 157 154 195
40 131 15 ~36 10 2 164 8 31 51 . 1 194 1~ 190 1 239
41 125 I 8 55~ 14 ~-- 0 174 9 27 74 ~ 4 215 1 ? 211 1 252
42 54 ~ 7 13 4 ~ 3 461 8 6 24 75 ~ 75 86
43 77~ 14 33i 5 ~ 4 90 7 15 41 ~ 133 ,~ 131 147
45 44~ 9 11 ~ 3 ~ 2 43 8 11 20~ 67~ 68 79'
46 61 ~ 22 33~ 2 ~ 3 36 9 10 14 79 " 78 97
47 49 [ 14. 14 ~ 3 1 49 2 10 25 79 ~. 80 85
·
48 65 , 11 '33 8 6 77 4 18 38 120 ~ 120 1 135
49 [ 19 ~ 58 33 2 2 36. 4 12 . 22 :, 84 : 81, 98
.50 :~153,~ 21 61 ~ 56 178~~11 23 ~ 44 2 217 , 215j 269
51 I; 32 4 '14 ~ 2 0 19 7 6 ', 24 ~ 1 47 48; 55
7717
City Hall~ Anaheim., California - COUNCIL MINUTES.- April 21, 199~, 1:30
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECIION - APRIL 14
CITY COUNC IL C ITT C ITT
C,~ ~PK TREASURER
CONSOLI~ ~1 " ....... "~ ..... - ' ~ " ' ...... -"
~3 ~iuf o~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TOTAL
DATED
~ ~ z~ m ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ BALLOTS
~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VOl~D
52 46~ d 26 O. 2 49 6 6 17 4 76 76 83
53 63i 12 37 5 6 51 1~ 15 30 1 107 1 108 1 122
54 34 25 27 2 2 30 66 16 42 104 I 104 I 129
55 48' ~ 17 3 2 59 ~ 2 32 76 _ 75~ 91
56 49~ 2 55 2 ~ 26 3 10 34 85 87 101
57 36~ 8' 11 7 5~ 27 42 15 69 98 i 100 116
__ 58 45~ 5 Q.~ 0 1~ 26 6 4 21 75 76 -88
59 65~ 25 40 0 3i 35 12 3 35 102 103 114
60 39 10 20~ 5 4 26 17 6 27 70 71 81
61 46~ 21 24~ 6 8 46 11 12 45 1 100 9~. 113
62 862 20 32~ 0 9 76 26 7 38_ 128 128 155
63 75; 14 21~ 15 5 51 12: 13 35 2 105 106 125
64 62 Z2 21 [ ~ 5 56 ~ 20 40 ~02 ~0~ ~;3
65 84.~ 23 39 ~ 14 6 99 22 25 38 ~ 151 ~--150 179
66 76: 40 22~ 12 10 ~76 13' 29 54 1 151 151 169
67 26~ 1~ 13~ 1 7 23 4 7 11 2 56 56 60
68 18[ 8 7 ~ 5 2 13 2 6 ] 17 35 36 41
69 32~ 15_ 13{ 4 3 21 14 10 ~ 15 2 59 57 67
70 30L 16 16 3 4~ 23 4___~J 36 61 61 70
50' 20 8 6 i
72 45[ 31, 9~ 2 ____~_ 2~ 12 ~2i 17 1 75 75 9~
73 ~ 24 3 4 431 18 ~71 26 90 89 ~0~
74 4~ 17 2 2_ 30J 11 11133 75 71 84
V5 [~~ 63 4 5 5~ 41 8 ~ 3V 142 ~- 14~~ 161
76 6~ 28 31 5 4 50i 46 13 i 31 2 122 123 1 149
77 ___~ 37 22 1 4 27] 40 2 ~ 28 91 92 106
78 48[ 14 38 i 3 551 25 8 i 29 100 9~ 117
79~60" 77 25
80 uo[ 70 41x 5 ~j_ 6~ 25 16 ~ 37 2 1~7 156 196
81 50i 18 281 1 91 46 15 31 25 77 79 1 103
83 64] i? 45 42~ 43~ 5 3 ~ 48 106 .... 106 ~ 116
84 ~ 3~ 38 18 16~ 27
69 10 47 3 106. 106 124
85~ 29 3~ 7 ? , 30 98 99 107
51 0 30 10
86 34 10 19 1 4 16 2 4 ~ 25 57 56 ..... 62
87 __~ 18 33 1 3 76 24 14 L 32 125 124 . 15~
88 .. 50'i 12 16 1 1 48 6 5 ': 10 55 56 __[~ 77
89 66J 12 27 2 4 54 16 16 ~ 42 103 102 [; 128
90 42j 12 8 3 4 2T 17 ~ 'r 21 64 64 1 77
91 50j 8 11 0 2 41 14 9 ~ 27 73 69 87
92 73~ 9 28 2 3 ~6 12 7 ~ 32 97 96 115
93 48} ~ 15 0 6 59 5 14 ~ 17_~ 73 72 90
94 55~ 17 32 1 0 41 8 ~ 21 85 83 98
9~ 39{ 14 16 0 6 29 5 7
96 60[ 12 22 1 7 39 6 6 ~ 46 96 93 109
97 44 17 16 2 4 30 10 9
98 18 . 49 6 1 6 14 4 6 50 67 66 79
99 63 145 19 4 3 69 23 15 136 194 196 1 262
100 68 42 31 4 7 66 4 17 41 125 1 124 1 145
101 23 16 17 1 1 9 12 4 20 48 47 55
102 28 15 5 1 0 29 3 6 13 3 49 44 54
TOTAL
VOTES 5361 1945 3002 422 438 5293 ~1659 1362 3665 68 11~16~ 14 i11~04~ 23 13~218
I718 ·
City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21; 1964~ 1:30
SECTION 4o The City Council does declare and determine that~
ODRA Lo (CHUCK) CHANDLER was elected as Member of the City
Council of said City for the full term of four years;
CALVIN Lo PEBLEY was elected as Member of the City Council
of said City for the full term of four years;
DENE Mo WILLIAMS was elected City Clerk of said City for the
full term of four years~,
Nt~Y BELLE E. SPENCER was elected City Treasurer of said City
for the full term of four years°
SECTION 5° That the City Clerk of said City is hereby directed
to enter this Resolution in full in the Minutes of the City Council°
SECTION 6o That the City Clerk shall inm~ediately make and',
upon compliance by the persons elected with the provisions of Sec%ion 11565
and Section 11568 of the Elections Code of the State of California~ shall
deliver to each of such persons so elected a certificate of election signed
by her and duly authenticated; that she shall also administer to each person
~lected the oath of office prescribed in the State Constitutio~ of the State
of California and shall have them subscribe thereto and file the same in her
office° Whereupon, each and all of said persons so elected shall be
inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected°
SECTION 70 That the City Cler~ shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original
Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and
adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of
said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and
adopted°
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this
21st day of April, 1964o
ATTEST
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
/s/ RECTOR L. COONS
Nt~YOR OF THE' CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s so
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE Mo WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No° 64R-266 was introduced and
adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the
City of Anaheim, held on the 21st day of April, 1964, by the following vote
of the members thereof~
AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES, COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said Resolution Nco 64R-266 on the 21s% day o{ April, !964. q
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the
official seal of the City of Anaheim this 21st day of April, 19640
(SEAL)
/s/ DENE M. WILLIAMS
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
7719
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
OATH OF OFFICE: The Oath of Offic~ was administered to Dene M. Williams,
newly elected City Clerk, by Rector L. Coons, Mayor of the City of
Anaheim.
The Oath of Office was administered by City Clerk, Dene M.
Williams, to newly elected Councilmen Odra L. Chandler and Calvin L.
Pebley, and City Treasurer, May Belle E. Spencer.
COUNCIL REORGANIZATION: City Clerk, Dene M. Williams, called the meeting
order and announced that nominations were in order for the Office of
Mayor of the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Krein nominated Odra L. Chandler, Mayor for the
City of Anaheim. Councilman Dutton moved that nominations be closed.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
A unanimous vote was cast for Odra L. Chandler, for Mayor of
the City of Anaheim.
City Clerk~ Dene M. Williams, announced that nominations
were in order for the Office of Mayor Pro Tempore for the City of
Anaheim.
Councilman Chandler nominated Jack C. Dutton, Mayor Pro
Tempore for the City of Anaheim. Councilman Krein moved the nominations
be closed. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
A unanimous vote was cast for Jack C. Dutton, Mayor Pro
Tempore of the City of Anaheim.
The new Council was called to order by Mayor Chandler.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: None.
PROCLAMATION - LAW DAY USA: May 1, 1964, was proclaimed Law Day USA by Mayor
Chandler and ratified by the City Council on motion by Councilman Schutte,
seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
Said proclamation was read in full by Mayor Chandler.
PRESENTATION TO.RECTOR L. COONS: Mayor Chandler read and presented the
following telegram from the Los Angeles Angels to Mr. Coons:
"Our sincere congratulations on this final day of your term
which has been notable for the accomplishments of you and your fellow
Councilmen. Signed, Cedric Tallas, Business Manager of the Angels,
Leonard K. Firestone, Bob Reynolds, Gene Autry."
In connection with said telegram, Mayor Chandler presented
Mr. Coons with an authentic Los Angeles Angels Baseball Cap, Angels
ash-tray and an Angels Year Book.
Mr. Coons was also presented his "Mayor" nameplate and the
gavel and pad he used during his tenure as Mayor of the City of Anaheim.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-267: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-267
for adoption, said resolution was read in full by the City Clerk.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING TO
RECTOR Lo COONS LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF
COURSE AND THE ,USE OF ITS FACILITIES WITHOUT COST TO HIMSELF; I
AYES: COUNCILM~N: Peble¥, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-267 duly passed and adopted.
7720
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: The following Resolution of Appreciation was of-
feted by Councilman Krein and unanimously adopted by the City Council:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Rector L. Coons has served the City of Anaheim as
Member of the City Council since April, 1956, and as Mayor of the City
of Anaheim since April 17~ 1962; and
WHEREAS, his knowledge and progressive spirit has been a tre-
mendous asset as the community grew from a population of approximately
43,000 to 140,000; and
WHEREAS, federal recognition of Orange County as "Anaheim-Santa
Aha-Garden Grove Metropolitan Area" is typical of the many outstanding
accomplishments in which Mayor Coons actively participated; and
WHEREAS, largely through his personal efforts, the welfare of
the community foremost, Anaheim presently looks forward to becoming the
"Home of the Angels Major League Baseball Club," with a new 50,000 seat
sports stadium, further adding to the status and prestige of becoming the
outstanding recreation convention and sports center of the world.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that on behalf of the City Council
of %he City of Anaheim, we do hereby express to Rector L. Coons our personal
appreciation and gratitude, and the appreciation and gratitude of the citi-
zen~ and residents of the City of Anaheim for the distin9uished and out-
standing services rendered durin9 his tenure of office; and further express
besi wishes, 9ood health, and continued success in all his future endeavors.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread upon the
minutes of the City Council, and a copy be forwarded to Rector L. Coons.
/HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS APPROVED AND SIGNED THIS 21st day
of April, 1964.
/s/ Odra L. Chandler
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
/s/ Dene M- Williams
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM
/s/ Jack C. Dutton
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
/s/ Calvin L. Peble¥
COUNCILMAN
/s/ Fred T. Krein
COUNC I LMAN
/s/ A. J. Schutte
COUNCILMAN
On roll call the foregoing Resolution of Appreciation, was duly
passed and adopted by the following unanimous vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Du/ton, Schu//e, Krein and Chandler
None
None
Mr. Coons expressed his appreciation for the resolutions and
the sentiment expressed in the telegram, and his thanks for the nameplate
and gavel. He stated he appreciated having had the opportunity to serve
the people of Anaheim, Anaheim being the residence of his family for many,
many years, and he felt it was the greatest City in the United States.
7721
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964, 1:30 P.M.
That the people may think they have seen major developments around them
during the last fifteen years, but as long as this Council and this City
continue with the type of leadership it has, and has had in the past~
there is no limit~ and Anaheim will be the Number One City in the County,
the Number One City in the State, and the Number One City in the Nation.
That as long as the governmental agencies in this city continue to think
of the people~ and think of the industries and the other activities that
are coming to town, and to take full consideration of their problems and
try to solve them with them, there is no limit to the growth and develop-
ment that this city can obtain. That it was a great pleasure to have been
able to serve the great citizens of Anaheim.
RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a five minute recess, Councilman $chutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 3:05 P.M.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present.
MINUTES: Approval of the City Council Minutes of April 7, 9, 10, 14 and 17,
1964, was continued to April 28, 1964.
ANAHEIM CHANtBER OF CONBIERCE - PROPOSED CHARTERs Communication dated April 17,
1964, from E. S. Hawkins, President, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, was
submitted, setting forth action taken by the Board of Directors at their
meeting held April 16, 1964, requesting the Anaheim City Council to
withdraw the Charter Proposal from the June ballot; that in the event
the Proposed Charter remains on the ballot, in its present form, the
Chamber will go on record of opposing the Charter as now written. Said
communication further stated in detail six points of opposition.
Copies were furnished each Councilman and Mayor Chandler
briefed the six items of opposition as follows:
Making the Library Board an Advisory Committee will be detrimental
to the Library.
Fixing the salaries of members of the City Council should not be a
provision of the Charter.
Provision regarding the manner of dismissal of the City Manager
(Section 606).
Provision regarding the appointment or dismissal of Department
Heads (Section 606).
5. The appointment of the City Clerk and City Treasurer positions,
rather than elective.
6. Regarding the award of bids on public works projects (Section 1211).
Mayor Chandler asked if %he Council wished to take action on
said communication.
Councilman Dutton moved said communication be received and filed.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Dutton asked, as a matter of information, if the
time limit for withdrawing the Proposed Charter from the ballot had not
expired.
The City Clerk reported that the Charter has been printed and
is being published tomorrow; that the deadline established by the County
Clerk's Office for receipt of the printed Charters for enclosure in the
sample ballots~ is April 23.
Discussion was held by the City Council and it was noted that
the Chamber did not express opposition to the Proposed Charter at any
of the public hearings~ and that the only change from the original pro-
posal submitted by the Cha~ter Citizens Advisory Committee~ was a pro-
vision pertaining to the salary for members of the City Council.
7722
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIE$ - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
Nit. George Strachan, Manager, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce,
recognized that the proposal of the Board o{ Directors was late, however,
recalled that at the last public hearing on the Proposed Charter, he had
advised the Council of pending Board Meetings and had requested a con-
tinuance of final Council action.
Mr. $tan Pawlowski, Treasurer of the Chamber of Commerce and
member of the Board of Directors, advised of the several Chamber Committees
formed to study provisions of the Proposed Charter, and reiterated the
written request that the Charter be withheld from the June ballot to allow
for additional study and consideration of the Charter in its present form;
that he also felt that the Charter would perhaps be more successful if
placed on the November General Ballot, or if a special election was held
therefor.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mayor Chandler advised the
representatives of the Chamber of Commerce that the Council would be very
happy to meet, in the interim, with any members or committees of the Chamber,
and discuss these matters presented and make any resolution which seems
~ecessary at that time, but he believed that it was important that the
Chamber look at the entire format with the realization that it can be
changed.
SIGN APPLICATIONS:
Oranqe Empire National Bank: Application requesting permission to
erect non=.conformin9 sign at 2045 South Harbor BoUlevard, together
with plans, was submitted and reviewed, and recommendations of the
Building and Planning Departments noted.
requested. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
Councilman Krein moved said sign application be granted as
MOTION CARRIED.
Tri:Par Realty: Application requesting erection of non-conforming
sign at 1775 West Lincoln Avenue, together with plans, was submitted
and reviewed by the City Council, and recommendations of the Building
and Planning Departments noted.
Councilman Dutton moved that action on said sign application
be continued to May 26, 1964, an inasmuch as this location appears to be a
strip -commercial development, that the applicant be requested to consider
the erection of an integrated sign. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
Broadway Motel: Application requesting permission to-erect two non-
conforming signs (roof sign and free standing sign) at 300 North
Manchester Avenue, together with plans, was submitted and reviewed
and recommendations of the Building and Planning Departments noted.
It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
said sign application be granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
De
McPeek Plymouth Center: Application requesting permission to erect a
non-conforming sign (free standing two face lighted sign, approximately
45 feet in height, oversize) at 1200 South Los Angeles Street, together
with plans, was submitted and reviewed, and recommendations of the
Building and Planning Departments noted.
Mr. Arnold Vang, representing Federal Sign and Signal Corporation,
addressed the Council, advising that Mr. McPeek has requested the proposed
sign be relocated and the application be revised to allow the sign to be
set 8 feet back from the property line at a 45 degree angle to the corner.
Ntr. Vang was invited to the Council Table to indicate on the
plans the proposed relocation, and discussion was held. ~
Councilman Dutton moved said sign request be granted, the nearest
side of the sign to be 10 feet back from the property line. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
7723
City Hall~ Anaheim~ Californ%a - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
.DISNEYLAND FIREWORKS DISPLAYS - ATLAS FIREWORKS COMPANY: .Application for }he
summer season firework Displays at the Disneyland Park, commencing on
Saturday, June 13, and continuing to September 12, and Friday and Saturday,
September 25 and 26, 1964, was submitted by Atlas Fireworks Company together
with communication of explanation dated April 20, 1964, from ~tr. Wallace B.
Wade, Manager, Marketing Division, Disneyland.
Councilman Krein moved said application for fireworks displays
at Disneyland Park be granted as requested. Councilman Pebley seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone in the audience wished to address
the Council on subject application. There was no response.
APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT: Application for Private Patrol Permit
submitted by John Ellis Prichard, dba Plant Protection Systems, also dba
Merchants Police and Protective Service, was submitted, and on the re-
commendations of the Chief of Police, it was moved by Councilman Dutton,
seconded by Councilman Schutte, said application be denied. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST - AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 4.24 OF TH~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: Request of
Frank F. Carson, Jr., Linbrook Family Billiard Center, for amendment to
Chapter 4.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as it pertains to age restric-
tions and closing hours in connection with family billiard centers, was
submitted; recommendation of the Chief of Police dated April 16, 1964,
was also submitted and read in full.
On the recommendation of the C~ief of Police, it was moved by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein that the City Attorney
be instructed to prepare necessary ordinance amending Chapter 4.24 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, to extend the closing hour to 2,00 A.M. and
removing the minimum age limit up to the hour of 10:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST - JAMAICA'S: Request of Ralph Ruiz Leos, President Anaheim Latin
American Association, for permission to operate "Jamaica"s'' which consists
of dancing, selling food, beer and refreshments, at 1542 North State College
Boulevard, for the period May through October, 1964, every Sunday from
2:00 PoM. to 12:00 A.Mo, was submitted and continued to April 28, 1964,
for further report and recommendations from the Chief of Police.
REQUEST- ST. ANTHONY CLARET CHURCH: Request of Mr. T. H. Thompson Jr.,
General Fiesta Chairman, St. Anthony Claret Church, for permission to
hold their seventh annual fund-raising fiesta on May 15, 16 and 17, 1964,
on the St. Anthony Claret School grounds at 1450 East La Palma Avenue,
and further requesting waiver of city license fees for the use of r~des
and booths, was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Dutton,
seconded by Councilman $chutte. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVE~ = DEMLER FARMS~ Request of Demler Farms for waiver of sidewalk
requirements on M-1 property, located 660 feet on the east side of Baxter
Street south of Via Burton, was submitted.
On the recommendation of the City Engineer, it was moved by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that temporary waiver
of sidewalks requirements be 9ranted providin9 that no permanent plantin9
or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for
future sidewalks. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER ~ ELECTRA MOTORS~ INC.: Request of Coalson C. Morris, Secretary
and Treasurer of Electra Motors, Inc., for waiver of sidewalk requirements
at 1110 North Lemon Street, was submitted.
On the recommendation of the City Engineer, it was moved by
Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, that a temporary sidewalk
waiver be granted providing that no permanent planting or permanent type
improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalks.
MOTION CARRIED.
7724
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT NO. 138 - REVISED PLANS: Request for approval of
revised plans was submitted by Kenneth W. Holt, Director of the Fairmont
School, to96ther with reports and recommendations from the Engimeering,
Building and Planning Departments.
No action was taken by the City Council on said matter as the
Departments'recommendations indicate no substantial change to the plans
originally submitted.
TENTATIVE N[APS - TRACT NO, $~25~ REVISION NO, 2 AND TRACT NO, 5519~ REVISION
NO~ 2: Bear State Builders Incorporated, Developers. Tracts located on the
north side of Ball Road, west of Beach Boulevard and filed in conjunction
with Reclassification No. 63-64-94 and Variance No. 1628.
Written request for continuance of action on said tract maps
was received from 3ack Rogoway, Agent.
It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Krein that said tentative tract maps be continued and considered in con~
junction with public hearing on Reclassification Application No. 63-64-94.
CITY ~LANN!NG COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held March 30, 1964, pertaining to the following applica-
tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO~ 1629: Submitted by Pacific Electric Railroad Company and
Sunshine Biscuits, Incorporated, requesting waiver of required P=L Zone
to permit adequate movement for tractor-trailer units on P-L and M-1
property located on the south side of Cerritos Avenue approximately 985
feet west of State College Boulevard, and further described as 1500 East
Cerritos Avenue°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1110,
Series 1963~64, granted said variance subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 549: Submitted by Orangethorpe Industrial Park,
requesting permission to establish a restaurant and cocktail lounge and
office building, primarily serving commerce and industry and waiver of
minimum 5 acre site size requirement on M-1 and P-L property located on
the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, approximately 1065 feet west of
Raymond Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1111,
S~ries 1963-64, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 550: Submitted by Victor and Cora Butchy,
requesting permission to establish a rest home for ambulatory patients
on R-3 property located on the east side of Melrose Street, approximately
330 feet south of Broadway, and ~urther described as 326 South Melrose
Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1112,
Series 1963=64, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions.
VARIA.NCE NOo 1599: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1120, Series
1963-64, amending the legal description contained in Resolution No. 881,
Series 1963-64, which granted Variance No. 1599.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no
~urther action taken on the above numbered Variances and Conditional Use
Permit applications.
RESOLIffION NO. 64R-268 - WORK ORDER NO. 419=8.0: On the recommendations of
the Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No.
64R-268 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
7725
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -.April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
SEALED PROPOSAL AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER
FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO CUT AND REMOVE ALL
WEEDS AND RANK GROWTH UPON ALL LOTS AND AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 419-8.0. (3ohn C. Warner - $7,730.00)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT:COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, }(rein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-268 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-269 = JOB NO. 819: On the certification of the Director
of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-269 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY
ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANI, LABOR,
SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA-
TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL
WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
PROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SEWER AND
WATER IMPROVEMENT, JOB NO. 819. (Longley Construction Co., Inc., Contractor)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:' Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-269 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-270 - WORK ORDER NO. 1814: Councilman Schutte offered Resolu-
tion No. 64R-270 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND
INSTALLING ONE DEEP WELL, TURBINE TYPE, LINE SHAFT PUMPING UNIT IN
WELL NO. 34, LOCATED AT THE REAR OF 518 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD (LOS
ANGELES STREET) IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ WORK ORDER NO. 1814; APPROVING
THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
IO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be opened May 14, 1964, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT:COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-270 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-271: On report and recommendations of the City Attorney,
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-271 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING
THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF,
REAL PROPERTY FOR STADIUM COMPLEX, SPORTS ARENA AND ASSOCIATED PARKING
PURPOSES.
7726
City Hall.., Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - AR~.il 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Roll call vote:
AYE S: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-271 duly passed and adopted.
INSURANCE AD3USTMENTS - FLEET: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Pebley, additional premiums in the total amount of $231.74 were
authorized, covering adjustments as result of the Annual Final Audit,
Comprehensive, Fire and Theft, Aetna Policy No. C37-23-68 and United Pacific
Policy ACR76475. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - 750 KVA TRANSFORMER: The City Manager reported on
informal bids received for the purchase of one 750 k'VA Transformer, as
follows, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid, that of Maydwell-
Hartzell, Inc. in the amount of $4,498.00 including tax.
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles
Parks & Co. A-C, Long Beach
3ohn G. Coffin, Pennsylvania
General Electric Co. G.E. Los Angeles
$4,498.00 including tax.
5,200.00 " "
5,241.60 " "
5,480.80 " "
On the recommendations of the City Manager, it was moved by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley that the low bid of
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc. be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount
of $4,498.00 including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE - LITTLE LEAGUE SHIRTS: The City Manager reported on informal bids
received for the purchase of 6,816 shirts, as follows, and recommended the
acceptance of the low bid, that of Wisser Sporting Goods, in the amount of
$4,749.39 including tax.
Wisser Sporting Goods, Anaheim
Conlin Bros., Whittier
Dutz Hilbers, Anaheim
Robert Hitchcock Calsteam Products, Inglewood
Center Sporting Goods
Grove Sporting Goods
$4,749.39
4,858.42
5,759.52
6,238.00
No quote
No quote
On the recommendations of /he City Manager, it was moved by
Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley that the low bid of
WisSer Sporting Goods, be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount
of $4~749.39~ including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE - 7-GANG TRACTOR MOWER: The City Manager reported on quotation re-
ceived from B. Hayman Co. Inc., for the purchase of Worthington Model "F"
Tractor with 7-gang wing lift Blitzer Mowers, or equal, ior use by the
Park Department, said quotation being in the amount of $6,875.00 plus
$275.00 sales tax.
On the recommendations of the City Manager, it was moved by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley that purchase be authorized
fro~ B. Hayman Co., Inc., in the total amount of $7~150.00. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE - CABLE: The City Manager reported on quotation received from the
Okonite Company for the purchase of 600 feet of 15 ky bypass wire to be
used in the Mobil Electrical Substa/ion's operation. That as a result
of extensive tests by the Electrical Division, he recommended purchase
be authorized in the total amount of $5,297.76.
On the recommendations of the City Manager, it was moved by
Councilman Dut/on, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that purchase be
authorized from /he Okonite Company in the amount of $5~297.76 including
tax. MOTION CARRIED.
7727
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
APPORTIONMENTS - vEHICLE LICENSE FEE REVENUES~ On motion by Councilman Dutton,
seconded by CounCilman Krein, Advance Apportionment of Vehicle License Fee
Revenues for the 1963-64 Fiscal Year~ and estimates for the 1964-65 Fiscal
Year~ received from Alan Cranston~ State Controller~ were ordered received
and filed. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY:
Claim filed by William R. Vedel for damages to vehicle in the amount
of $76.75~ allegedly received on or about September 10th~ 1963~ in
the Nortronics~ parking lot at 905 Orang,thorpe Avenue.
Claim filed by Otis Dale Walker for damages to vehicle in the amount
of $799.71, allegedly received on or about November 3rd, 1963, as
result of road construction.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein,
the foregoing claims were denied by the City Council and referred to
the City's Legal Department. MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 64R-272 to 64R-276,
both inclusive~ for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-272: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(3ohn D. and Ethel La Vonne Light)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-273: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING A
SANITARY SEWER. (Financial Federation, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-274: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERIY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Equitable Water Co.)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-275: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Wilburn-Flum Corporation)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-276: A RESOLIrrlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Everett H. and Elma M. Miller) ~
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 64R-272 to 64R-276, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman grein.
Telegram and letter of congratulations on the dedication of the new
recreation building from 3ames E. Whetmore, Assemblyman, 70th District.
Minutes of the Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Meeting of
March 20~ 1964.
7728
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21,. 1964~ 1:30 P~M~
c. Minutes of the Anaheim Citizens' Civil Defense Committee Meeting
of April 1, 1964.
Feather River Project Association correspondence as follows:
(1) Notice and Agenda of Annual Meeting to be held Friday~ May 1, 1964.
(2) Resolution in opposition to Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan.
(3) Resolution, California's Comments on the Pacific Southwest Water Plan.
MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL AND. OPERATING REPORTS: On motion bY Councilman Dutton, seconded by
Councilman Krein~ Financial and Operating Reports for the month of March,
1964, were ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1985: Councilman Dut%on offered Ordinance No. 1985 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM N~JNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No parking at any time - portion of Magnolia Avenue)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1985 and
having knowledge o{ the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the-motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIIA~EN:
NOES: COUNCILNIEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIIA~EN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1985 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. %986: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1986 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANIENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.40,
SECTION 14.40.070 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SPEED
LIMITS. (45 miles per hour - Magnolia Avenue from northerly city
limits to La Palma Avenue)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1986 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNC IIN~N:
NOES: COUNC IIJ~EN:
ABSENT: COUNC IIA~EN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1986 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1987: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 1987 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-13 - C-i)
7729
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/~S - April 21, 1964, 1:30 P.M.'
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1987 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton-moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, $chutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1987 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1988: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1988 for first readin9.
AN ORDINANCE'OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(12) - M-1 and P-L)
After hearin9 read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1988 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
readin9 in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1989: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1989 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No parking at any time - west side of Homer Street, from Anaheim
Boulevard to Romneya Drive; east side from southerly end of the City
parking lot to Romneya Drive)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1989 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Du%ton moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATIONS: The City Manager reported on the following
applications for Alcoholic Beverage License:
a. Off Sale Beer and Wine License - Murray Manor, 911 North Brookhurst Street;
business presently located in an R-A Zoner being an established business
prior to annexation.
b. Premises to Premises Transfer of On-Sale Beer and Wine - Italian Villa,
404 - 406 North State College Boulevard extension of existing business.
c. AffidaVit in support of On-Sale General Club License, naming a new
Manager - Elks Lodge, 423 North Los Angeles Street.
d. New Off-Sale General - Dell H. and Helen Gressley, unnamed business,
located at 1287-A East Lincoln Avenue, C=l Zoning.
No action was taken by the City Council on the above Alcoholic
Beverage Applications.
e. New On-Sale Beer - 3oseph E. Dertoli and Dominic Mangiardei, unnamed busi-
ness to be located at 1112 - 5 and 6 North Brookhurst Street; C-1 Zoning.
On motion by Councilman Dutton seconded by Councilman Pebley', the
City Attorney was authorized to file a protest with the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Board on the basis of improper zoning. MOTION CARRIED.
INDUSTRIAL CONSULTANT: It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Pebley that the City Manager take immediate action to establish an Industrial
Consultant's Office at this tim~ and to include such office in the 1964-65
Budget, and to make recommendations as soon as possible as to personnel.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS~ Councilman Schutte moved to recess to 7:00 P.M., Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 P.M.)
7730
City H~ll~ Anahei.m~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
ABSENT: COU~ILN~N: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dena M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Mickelson.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Grudzinski.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
PUBLI C HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 543: Submitted by Vesper B. White,
concerning property on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 758
feet west of Euclid Avenue (1759 West Orange Avenue).
The City Clerk read communication dated April 21, 1964, from Harry
Knisely, Attorney for the Applicant, requesting that public hearing on
Conditional Use Permit No. 543 be continued as he was unable to be present
this evening.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 543 was continued to May 5,
1964, 7:00 P.M~ MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEA~tNG~ - RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~-64-8~ AND VARIANCE NO..!~22, RECLAS-
SIFICATION ,NO. ~'63-64-96~ AREA DEVELOPN[ENT PLAN NO. 1, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NOt 547:~
~C~LAS$IFICATION NO. 63-64-81: Submitted by Gordon Haney and William Ferdi,
requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-1 on property located at 102 North
Larch Street. (Northeast corner, Lincoln Avenue and Larch Street.)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to ReSolution No. 1098,
Series 1963-64~ recommended Reclassification No. 63-64-81 be denied.
VARIANCE NO. 1622: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commi~sion~ requesting
permission to use a residential structure at 102 North Larch Street for
an escrow office.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1099~
Series 1963-64~ denied Variance No. 1622.
RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 63-64-96: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission
requesting change of Zone from R-1 to C-O, properties described as 1433 to
1511 East Lincoln Avenue, and 102 and 106 North Larch Street. (Parcels
"A" through "E" - 1433~ 1437~ 1501~ 1505 and 1511 East Lincoln Avenue~
Parcels "F" and "G" - 102 and 106 North Larch Street.)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1100,
Series 1963-64, recommended Reclassification No. 63-64-96 for approval,
subject to the following conditions:
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of
the street, along Lincoln Avenue~ for street widening purposes.
That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings and the proposed 20 foot easement to Lincoln Avenue shall
shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public.
Works, prior to final building inspection.
That the damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks shall be repaired
along Lincoln Avenue and Larch Street, as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications
on file in the office of the City Engineer.
7731
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
5. That the' existing driveway approaches be removed on Lincoln Avenue,
and the driveway depressions replaced with curb and gutter, in ac-
cordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the
office of the City Engineer.
6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2~ 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned~ shall be
complied with prior to the reading of the ordinance reclassifying
individual parcels of subject property to the C-0, Commercial
Office, Zone.
7. That development of all parcels of subject properties shall be in
accordance with Area Development Plan No. 1.
8. That a 20=foot access easement shall be provided on the easterly
boundary of Parcel "F" as shown on Area Development Plan No. 1
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1: The City Planning Commission pursuant to
Resolution No. 1097~ Series 1963-64~ recommended the adoption of Area
Development Plan No. 1, in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64-96.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 547: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Com-
mission in conjunction with Reclassification No. 63-64-96, requesting
permission to use residential structure at 102 North Larch Street for
office purposes.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1101~
Series 1963=64~ granted Conditional Use Permit No. 547 subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 63-64~96 for subject property only.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,'
marked Exhibit No. 1
3o That a time limitation of five years shall be made for the use of the
existing residence on subject property and upon request by the
petitioner~ an additional time limitation may be granted~ if approved~
by the. Planning Commission.
Associate Planner Ronald Grudzinski noted the location of subject
properties~ and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He
summarized the evidence presented at the public hearings before the City
Planning Commission~ noting that Area Development Plan No. 1 was prepared
at direction of the Commission in conjunction with the original petition
for C-1 under Reclassification No. 63-64-81. That the study area in-
corporated six additional properties with the Original parcel~ as a~result,
proceedings were initiated for reclassification of the total seven parcels
to the C-O Zoner and for Conditional Use Permit to allow office use of the
residential structure, designated as Parcel "F~'~ at 102 North Larch Street.
(Northeast corner~ Larch Street and Lincoln Avenue.)
Mr. Grudzinski noted that the City Planning Commission felt
C-O Zoning would provide the least objectionable uses abutting the residen-
tial properties to the north~ and noting Area Development Plan No. 1
posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber~ reported that access to
future off-street parking and business uses on Parcels "A" through "E"
would be restricted to the existing alley on the north side of said
parcels; and the 20 foot easement indicated on the east side of Parcel
"F"~ running north from Lincoln Avenue~ would provide an access drive
to Parcel "G" and would ultimately serve eight off-street parking spaces
for Parcels "F" and "G", limiting traffic ingress and egress to Lincoln
Avenue. He advised that the property designated as Parcel "G" (106 North
Larch Street) was included in the proposed development plan because said
property' is in a direct line with the alley to be used for access purposes.
In answer to Mayor Chandler~s question with reference to
Condition No, 3 of Conditional Use Permit No. 547, Mr. Grudzinski advised
that the City Planning Commission felt that after a five year period any
commercial use of the residential structures would be developed sufficiently
for the owners to construct commercial buildings.
7732
City ~all~ Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Discussion was held regarding the 20 foot easement across
Parcel "F" to provide access to Lincoln Avenue for Parcel "G", as
indicated on Area Development Plan No. 1. Mr. Geisler advised that the
condition could be so worded that the developer of Parcel "F" would be
required to dedicate said easement at the time Parcel "G" was ready for
development to commercial use, conditioned upon a conveyance from Parcel
"G" giving mutual parking rights, as five of the eight parking spaces on
the the east side of the two properties are proposed to be located on
Parcel "G". He called attention to the 10 foot width between the two
residential properties, which is inadequate for ingress and egress from
Larch Street to the proposed parking area.
Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant was present and wished
to address the Council.
Mr. William Yardi, co-owner of property at 102 North Larch
Street, advised they were only interested in the corner lot as indicated
in their original petition for Reclassification No. 63-64-81, and adequate
parking for the proposed escrow office was indicated on the plans. Mr.
Ferdi asked clarification of wall requirement between their Parcel "F"
and Parcel "G" to the north, should Parcel "G" be included in the
Resolution of Intent to rezone.
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council and it
was noted that a six foot masonry wall along the north boundary of
Parcel "F" was a recommended condition, should Reclassification No.
63-64-81 be approved by the City Council.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the City
CounCil in support of subject applications, there being no response,
asked if anyone desired to offer opposition.
Mr. M. O. Victor, 1510 East Birch Street, directly behind
Parcel "E", advised that he opposed the requested rezoning, but felt
that C=O Zoning would be less objectionable than with C-l, however,
expressed concern that multi-story buildings might be developed in the
future removing his privacy° He called attention to the Area Development
Plan Noo 1, which indicated Cemetery Road to be an alley, and stated to
his knowledge this road is a private easement for access to the Anaheim
Cemetery. Regarding the 20 foot alley along the north side of Parcels
"A" through "E", he felt there was not sufficient width for traffic to
turn around~
Mr. Victor further advised thai he was not opposed to the C-O
ZoniDg on the property requesting the office use in the residential
structure (Parcel "H"), providing adequate parking was required, and
noted the benefits to residents in the area if access to said parcel
could be closed from Larch Street, with all ingress and egress limited
to Lincoln Avenue. However, in his opinion, the balance of subject
properties should individually request specific uses as they are ready
to develop.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the
City Council.
Mrs. Howard W. Stanton, 1498 East Birch Street, advised this
is a well-kept residential area, and was opposed to commercial zoning
as proposed, with the exception of Parcel "F", provided access is
restricted to Lincoln Avenue and the residential character of the
structure is maintained. In her opinion, if Parcel "G" were included
applications for similar uses on properties fronting Larch Street to
the north would be soon filed. Mrs. Stanton submitted a petition of
opposition to C-1 Zoning, signed by owners of four properties on Birch
Street.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City
Council, there being no response, declared the Public Hearing closed
on Reclassification No. 63-64-81, Variance No. 1622, Reclassification
No. 63-64-96, Conditional Use Permit No. 547 and Area Development Plan No. 1.
7733
F
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCI.L MINUTES - April 21.3 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-277: Further discussion was held by the City
Council and at the conclusion thereof~ Councilman Dutton offered
Resolution No. 64R-277 for adoption~ concurring with recommendations
of the City Planning Commission~ denying Reclassification No. 63-64-81.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN
AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (63-64-81)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILN~N:
Pebley~ Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler
None
None .
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-277 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-278: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-278
for adoption~ sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission~
denying Variance No. 1622.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 1622.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N:
NOES: COUNCILN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILN~N:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-278 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUIION NO. 64R-279: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-279
for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance~ changing
the zone on Parcel "F" only to C~0 (102 North Larch Street)~ subject to
the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ with the following ,
amendments:
Condition Nos. 2~ 5 and 8 - to be eliminated,
Condition No. 6 - to be amended by omitting the Nos. "2" and "5".
Condition No. 7 - to be amended to read~ "That development of subject
parcel shall be in accordance with Area Development Plan No. 1~ as amended".
Condition to be added: "That a solid fence shall be maintained at all
times between Parcels "F" (102 North Larch Street) and "G" (106 North Larch
Street)~ and plans for any future structural changes shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Council''.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DE/ERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE ANIENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63~64-96 - C~O)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNC I LM~N:
NOES: COUNC I LNiEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-279 duly passed and adopted.
7734
City Hall~ AnaheimI California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-280: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-280
for adoption, approving Area Development Plan No. 1 eliminating Parcel
"G" therefrom.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA
D£V£LOPMENT PLAN NO. 1.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCII3AEN:
NOES: COUNCII~tEN:
ABSENT: COUNCII3AEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-280 duly passed and adopted.
R~.SOLUTION NOv 64R-281: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-281
for adoption~ granting Conditional Use Permit No. 547, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 547.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIL~N:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-281 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HE6RING ? RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 63-64-89 AND 63-64-97: Property briefly
described as located on the east side of Kroeger Street~ approximately 167
feet nOrth of Santa Aha Street (406 and 412 South Kroeger Street).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-89: Submitted by N~3P Warehouse Corporation
requesting change of zone from R-3 to M-1.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1098,
Series 1963-64, recontmended that Reclassification No. 63-64-89 be denied.
R~CLAS~IFICATION NO. 63-64-97: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission
requesting change of zone from R-3 to P-1.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to ResolutiOn No. 1088,
Series 1963-64, recommended Reclassification No. 63-64-97 for approval,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the curbs and damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks shall be removed
and/or reconstructed along Kroeger Street, as required by the City
_Engineer prior to final building inspection.
2. ~That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum o{ 15¢ per front foot along Kroeger Street~ for tree planting
purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever
occurs first.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with the adopted off-street parking requirement standards~ and further
that it shall be developed in accordance with the general provisions
of the requirements of Section 18.04.030.
4. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the north and east
boundaries of subject property said wall to be constructed within 180
days from date hereof.
5. That a 42-inch decorative masonry wall shall be constructed on the
west property line immediately behind a 3-foot strip of landscaping,
said wall to be constructed within 180 days from date hereof.
7735
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLrIEs - April 21~ 1964, 1:.30 P.M.
6. That a 3-foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Kroeger
Street frontage and said iandscaping maintained; that plans for
said iandscaping shaIi be submitted to and approved by the Super-
intendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said iandscaping shaii
be instailed within i80 days from date hereof.
7. That any iiiumination of the parking area shaii be provided by iow
mushroom Iight standards with the iilumination directed downward
and away from the residentiai deveiopment adjacent to subject property,
subject to the approvai of the Chief Buiiding Inspector.
Associate Planner Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject
property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing
the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
He noted the City Planning Commission's finding that the applicants requested
M-1 Zoning would be incompatible to the residential character of adjacent
properties to the north along Kroeger Street, and that although the
Zoning was for the purpose of legalizing existing parking and storage on
the property, any M-1 use would be permitted once the zoning was completed,
and for these reasons, the City Planning Commission initiated Reclassifica-
tion No. 63-64-97 requesting P-1 Zoning.
Mr. Mickelson called attention to photographs of subject property,
on file in Reclassification No. 63-64-89, illustrating storage of shipping
crates and products, and advised that some stored materials have now
been removed. He noted Conditions of Reclassification No. 63-64-97 re-
quiring a 6 foot masonry wall on the north and east boundaries of subject
property, and a 42 inch decorative wall on the west boundary behind a 3
foot strip of landscaping, advising that as result of protest from residents,
the City Planning Commission felt these requirements would improve the
aesthetic appearance of the parking lot while partially shielding from view
the uses on the adjacent ~CP industrial property to the east and soulh.
Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the City Council.
Mr. Clarence C. Taylor, representing ~CP Warehouse Corporalion,
advised that before their building was destroyed by fire, they were not
aware of the non-conforming use on subject property; that they applied for
and still request the M=I Zoning to legalize the existing storage usage
on the back portion of subject property, even though they intend to use
the 9rearer portion of the property for parking purposes in connection with
the existing M-1 Zoning and use on their adjacent property to the South and
East.
Regarding the recommended wall on the east boundary, he noted
the necessity of subject parcel being accessible to said adjacent M-i
property.
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Taylor advised that the
corporation owns the abutting residence to the north, and further, that
they have no objection to the requirement of a wall and landscapin9 on
Kroeger Street.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the City
Council in favor of the proposed reclassification, there being no response,
asked if anyone had opposition to offer into evidence.
Mr. A. E. Surber, owner of property at 331 South Kroeger Street,
called attention to a letter signed by approximately thirteen property
owners in the area, opposing the requested M-1 Zoning due to the possibility
of future industrial use of said property and also because of the unsightly
past usage of the property. He advised that they have no objection to the
rezoning of the property to P-l, however, requested that the proposed wall
along the Kroeger Street frontage and the north boundary be required.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification
No. 63-64-89 and 63-64-97.
7736
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Reclassification files were reviewed by the City Council and
discussion held, and Councilman Krein asked the applicant if there were
any plans to construct an industrial building in the future on subject
property.
Mr. Taylor advised that the corporation had no such plans and
that the purpose was only to legalize the existing industrial storage use
on the rear portion of subject property.
Further discussion was held, and it was noted that the new M-1
Zoning Ordinance requires screening of storage uses. It was suggested
that the three foot decorative wall requirement be changed to require a
six foot masonry wall behind the three feet of landscaped setback,
eliminating the six foot wall in the middle of the ApplicantVs property
while effectively screening the property from the residential area.
Mr. Surber noted that waste materials and supplies are some-
times stacked on subject property as high as 20 feet, and in his opinion
a six foot wall would not adequately screen storage from view.
Mr. Taylor advised that they would have no objection to place
a six foot wall along the Kroeger Street boundary, further, he noted that
their increased warehouse capacity will accommodate more storage mate-
rials, although some open air storage is unavoidable.
Photographs and files were again reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Ira Faubion, owner of property at 401 South Kroeger Street,
requested that the records reflect his opposition, noting the unsightly
appeDrance of subject property.
Councilman Pebley left the meeting, 8:15 P.M.
In response to Council questioning, Mr. Taylor agreed that
better housekeeping procedure should be instituted on the property in
question, and reported that arrangements are being made for more
efficient bulk storage of materials.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-282: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-282
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone of subject property to M-l, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the curbs and damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks shall be removed
and/or reconstructed along Kroeger Street, as required by the City
Engineer prior to final building inspection.
2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Kroeger Street, for tree planting
purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever
occurs first.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with the adopted off-street parking requirement standards, and further
that it shall be developed in accordance with the general provisions
of the requirements of Section 18.04.030.
4. That a 6 foot solid masonry wall shall be constructed on the Kroeger
Street .frontage immediately behind the 3 foot strip of landscaping,
except at driveway approaches and a solid masonry wall be constructed
on the north property line, said walls to be constructed within 180
days from date hereof.
5. That a 3 foot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Kroeger Street
frontage and said landscaping maintained~ that plans for said land-
scaping shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance; and that said landscaping shall be installed
within 180 days from date hereof.
6. Ihat any illumination of the parking area shall be provided by low
mushroom light standards with the illumination directed downward
and away from the residential development adjacent to subject pro-
perry, subject to the approval of the Chief Building Inspector.
7737
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
7. That trash storage areas shall be Provided in accordance with
approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, at such time as said trash storage areas shall be demanded
by the City.
(Councilman Pebley returned to the meeting, 8:25
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
70NING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-89 -
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCIIAIEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIL~IEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIIAtAN:
Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-282 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-283: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-283
terminating all proceedings in connection with Reclassification No.
63-64-97.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-97.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCIL~;~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMAN:
Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-283 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-93: Submitted by Edward V. Kalmar, Thomas J. and
Alice C. Whieldon, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-l, to allow
development into two single-family residential lots, property briefly
described as located on the east side of Sunkist Street approximately
660 feet north of Wagner Avenue (908 South Sunkist Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1102,
Series 1963-64, recommended said Reclassification for approval, subject
to the following conditions:
That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Sunkist Street, for street widening purposes.
That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Sunkist Street, such as
curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage
facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required
by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the office o{ the City Engineer: and that
a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
be posted with the City to Guarantee the installation of said engineer-
ing requirements.
That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Sunkist Street, for street lighting
purposes.
That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a 3-foot public utility easement and a 2-foot overhang easement along
the south 108 feet of the easterly boundary of subject property.
7738
City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ April 21, 1964, 1:$0. ~M.
5. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a 3-foot overhang easement along the southerly boundary of subject
property.
6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and re-
creation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
7. That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject
property be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Sunkist Street, for tree planting
purposes; said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever
occurs first.
9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, above mentioned, shall
be complied with at the time the building permit is issued or within
a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the
City Council may grant.
10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council and it was
noted that on February 5~ 1964, the applicants were granted permission
by the City Council to proceed with construction of a single family
dwelling on subject property pending completion of Reclassification
proceedings, all obligation and responsibility to be assumed by the
applicants~ with the stipulation that a certificate of use and oc-
cupancy would be issued only after R-1 Zoning is completed.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council
in opposition to the requested zoning, there being no response, asked
if the applicants wished to address the Council.
As the applicants had nothing to add, Mayor Chandler declared
the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 63-64-93.
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-284: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No.
64R-284 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance~
changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the
City Planning Commission.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF /HE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND /HAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-93 - R-l)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN z
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-284 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-64-95 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.545:
Submitted by Stanley L. Rosen, requesting change of zone from R-A to
R-3 and permission to establish a single-story, multiple-family, planned
residential development with carports, and waiver of minimum rear yard;
property briefly described as located on the east side of Western Avenue
approximately 550 feet north of Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1103,
Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification be denied; and pursuant
to Resolution No. 1104~ Series 1963-64~ denied Conditional Use Permit No. 545.
7739
City Hall, Anaheim" California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Letter dated April 14, 1964, from George and Irma safco, owners~-
of business at 801 South Western Avenue, in support of the reclassification,
was read into evidence by the City Clerk.
Mr. Mickelson referred to the sectional zoning map on the east
wall of the Council Chamber, noting the location of subject property,
and the uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called attention to
findings of the City Planning Commission resulting in their recommended
denial of the request for rezoning.
Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the City Council.
Mr. Stanley L. Rosen, 509 Priscilla Way, Applicant, called
attention to properties in the vicinity of subject parcel, noting the
use of property on the west side of Western Avenue for the sale of dairy
products and eggs, the use of residential property at the northeast corner
of Western Avenue and Ieraminar Drive for agricultural purposes, and new
apartment development just south of Ball Road on Western Avenue. He sub-
mitted various photographs for Council review, and was of the opinion that
subject property and others in the area do not necessarily coincide with
single-family development.
Mr. Rosen noted the presence of the Architect for the project,
Mr. Le Roy Rose, and further advised that the plans for the eleven-unit
apartment development includes 1000 square foot units, with wood shingle
roofs, and noted the 19 dwelling unit per net acre density and 33 percent
land coverage. He called attention to the heavy traffic on Western'Avenue,
and noted that ingress and egress for the property will be limited to
Western Avenue.
At /he request of Councilman Krein, Mr. Mickelson reported on
the method used by the City Planning Department in calculating net acreage
figures for planned residential developments.
Mayor Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the~Council
in favor of the proposed reclassification, there being no response, asked
if there was anyone who wished to speak in opposition.
Mr. R. E. Donovan, owner of property directly across the street,
advised that the neighbors in the area oppose the R,3 use~ that 24 property
owners appeared at the public hearing before the City Planning Commission
and he asked Council consideration of investments which these property.
owners have made in this area.
Other residents addressing the City Council in opposition'to
the R-3 Zoning were Mr. James E. Smith, Mr. William I. Gaudener, Mr; C. E.
Christensen, and Mr. Harry Renninger of 3136, 3166, 3174 and 3160 Teranimar
Drive respectively. They agreed with statements made by Mr. Donovan, noting
that the "agricultural use" is a nursery, and voicing opinions that to grant
the request will constitute spot zoning in an area of R-1 uses and zoning,
would depreciate the value of surrounding properties, and add additional
automobile parking on the streets.
In rebuttal, Mr. Rosen called attention to two apartment~de~
velopments exis/in9 or under construction in the area of Ball Road and
Western Avenue, and was of the opinion that /he proposed developmen±
was planned to be in keepin9 with the residential character of the
neighborhood, while developin9 the property to its highest and best use.
Mayor Chandler stated that a good cross section of the evidence
had been obtained, and thereupon declared the hearing closed on Reclas-
sification No. 63-64-95 and Conditional Use Permit No. 543.
Plans and the files were further reviewed by the City Council
and discussion was held.
7740
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21~ 1964~ 1:30
R£SoLu!ION NO. 64R-285: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-285 for adoption, concurring with re-
commendations of the City Planning Commission, denying Reclassification
No. 63-64-95.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN
AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (63-64-95)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIIA~N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-285 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-286: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-286
for adoption, sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission,
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 545.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 545.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-286 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a 15 minute recess and invited those
present to participate in a birthday celebration for Councilman Krein.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the
City Council being present.
Councilman Krein expressed his appreciation to the City Council
and staff.
PUBLIQ HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-91~ CONDITIONAL USE PERi, IT NO.
54%~ AND GF~NER%L PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 4; AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 57 AND
TENTATIVE ,MA, Pt TRACT NO. 5521~ REVISION NO. 1: Submitted by Donna A.
Bowen, Masami Ogata and 3ohn G. Weber, requesting change of zone from
R-A to R-3, property briefly described as located on the south side
of Ball Road, approximately 666 feet west of Magnolia Avenue (2648,
2656 and 2664 West Ball Road); and further requesting permission to
establish a one and two-story multiple-family planned residential
development with carports, and waiver of the following:
1. one-story height limitation within 150 feet of R-A property
2. minimum lot width and area.
3. required frontage of all lots on a dedicated street or alley
4. required side yards
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1106,
Series 1963-64, recommended the adoption of Area Development Plan No. 5~
subject to the following conditions:
That the circulation system should be developed in accordance with
the intent of the circulation system depicted on the exhibit
denoted as Area Development Plan No. 5.
7741
City Hall~'Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 2~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
That Sherrill Street be extended northerly in order to provide
adequate circulation for subject property and to provide adequate
access from the existing single family subdivision southerly of
/he study area to Ball Road.
That all development proposals within /he bounds of Area Development
Plan No. 5, be subject to review by the Development Review Committee.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1109,
Series 1963-64, approved General Plan Amendment No. 4.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to R~solution No. 1108,
Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No.. 541~ subject to the
following conditions:
5
That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and re-
creation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, prior to final building inspection.
That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department~ to be installed
prior to final building inspection.
That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 63-64-91.
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Revision No. 1, Exhibit No. 1, and Exhibit Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5.
That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the southerly
property line, prior to final building inspection.
That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of a
6-foot masonry wall on the east and west property lines, prior to
final building inspection.
Mr. Grudzinski noted the location of subject property,
comprising three parcels, described the uses and zoning in the immediate
area, and called attention to the single-family developments located
across Ball Road to the north~ and within the City limits of Stanton
to the south. He noted the approximate 396 foot by 607 foot size of
the property, the existing drainage pattern, and the general agricultural
use in subject area.
Mr. Grudzinski called attention to Area Development Plan No. 5,
posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, which was prepared at the
direction of the City Planning Commission; said plan incorporating the
area between Magnolia Avenue and the Edison Company easement, and from
Ball Road to Lola Avenue in the City of Stanton; and noted the proposed
northerly extension of Sherrill Street from the south requested by the
City of Stanton as the logical access from Ball Road to residential
properties in said City. He noted that the City Planning Commission
recommended future development of those parcels adjacent to subject
property be made in accordance with the intent of the circulation system
indicated on the Area Development Plan, particularly as it pertains to
Sherrill Street.
Attention was also called to General Plan Amendment No. 4,
posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, and Mr. Grudzinski
reported that the City Planning Commission felt low medium density would
be a logical alternative to the low density development indicated on the
existing General Plan.
Councilman Pebley referred to the Area Development Plan,
noting that the owner of the parcel lying between subject property and
the Edison Company easement to the west, would be required to dedicate
at least one-third of his property for the proposed extension of Sherrill
Street, and he questioned the equity of this arrangement.
7742
City Hall~ Anah,eim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21.~ 19,64~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Grudzinski advised that the owner of said parcel, Mr. Allen,
has indicated his recognition of the logic in extending Sherrill Streetl
further, in his being able to utilize the access drives on subject pro-
perty under the circulation as proposed, subject to payment of a prede-
termined proportionate share of costs of improvements, in essence he
would acquire twenty additional feet of usable land for access to his
property.
Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant was present, and wished
to address /he Council.
Mr. John G. Dugan, 624 Anthony Street, Authorized Agent for
the applicants, referred to the Area Development Plan noting the 20
foot access drive across the southerly portion of subject property, which
would also provide access for those parcels east and west thereof. He
advised that the plans for the proposed 68 unit were the result of
consultations with members of the City staff; further, that the developers
plan to rent their units to tenants having no children under the age of
13, thereby avoiding a possible crowding of elementary schools.
Mr. Lee Bowen, 2648 West Ball Road, addressed the Council,
reporting that during a recent convemsation with the owner of property
to the west of subject parcels, Mr. Allen expressed no objection to
the proposed extension of Sherrill Street. He called attention to the
heavy traffic on Ball Road, and to a similar development of higher
density located approximately two blocks west of the area, and further
advised thai the property owner to the east of subject property, Mr.
Blake, is in favor of the proposed reclassification.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition.
Ntt. Howard Davis, 8841Lola Avenue, Stanton, requested
information as to the number and location of the proposed single-
story and two-story buildings.
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and
it was noted that the garages would be placed 25 feet north of the
wall on the southerly boundary, four single-story buildings were to
be located approximately 60 feet north of the wall, with the two-
story buildings located a minimum distance of 150 feet north of
said wall.
Mr. Davis advised of the fine homes in the subdivision to
the south of the property within the City of Stanton, and noted that
some of the Lola Avenue residents are opposed to the development,
althou9h they prefer apartments to a shopping center. He requested
that the applicants be required to increase the height of the existing
wall on the north side of their homes to alleviate noise from traffic
using access drives to carports.
Mr. Ben Landhuis, 8821Lola Avenue, addressed the Council
concurring with Mr. Davis' remarks, requesting an approximate 16 inch
addition to the existing wall. He reported that the said wall measures
approximately 5 feet 4 inches from the ground level on his property
line.
Mr. Landhuis was informed of the Anaheim Municipal Code
requirement for a 6 foot block wall between R-3 and R-1 properties,
and of the Council Policy that said walls be measured from that side
which has the highest finished grade; further, that the choice of
adding to the existing wall or constructing a separate wall was a
matter to be determined by the developer.
Mr. Dugan advised that it will be necessary to fill the
south portion of the property, and he would have no objection to the
6 foot wall requirement as outlined.
7743
City Hall, Anaheim' California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 21, 1964, 1.:30 P~M...
MaYor Chandler stated that a good cross section of the evidence
had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed on Reclas-
sification No. 63-64-91, Conditional Use Permit No. 541 and General Plan
Amendment No. 4.
RESOLUTION NOw 64R-287: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-287
for adoption, concurring with recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested,
subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-91 - R-3)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-287 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-288: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-288
for adoption sustaining action of the City Planning Commission, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 541, subject to the recommendations of the
City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 541.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-288 duly passed and adopted.
.RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-289: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-289
for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 4~ subject to the re-
commendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS A~ENDMENT NO. 4. (63-64-91)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-289 duly passed and adopted.
AREA DEVELOPMENT PlAN NO. 5: On the recommendations of the City Attorney,
the City Council suspended all proceedings on Area Development Plan No. 5.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 5521, REVISION NO.,..1~ Developer - D. & M. Develop-
ment Company; tract contains 71 proposed R-3 condominium lots, property
described in Reclassification No. 63-64-91.
7744
City H~ll~ Anaheim, california - coups. IL MINUTES - April 21, 1964., 1,30
The city Planning commission at their meeting held March 30,
1964, approved said Revised Tentative Map subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings, to Ball Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5521, Revision
No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification
No. 63-64-91 and Conditional Use Permit No. 541.
4. That "A" Street shall be 64 feet wide with a 40-foot roadway.
5. That the following stipulations be noted on the final tract map:
a. Lettered lots (1-a through 85-a) to be used for carports
with no residential uses permitted.
b. Lot No. 69 to be used for recreational uses with no
residential uses permitted.
c. Use and occupancy of all lots shown hereon, are subject to
conditions and restrictions of Conditional Use Permit No. 541.
6. That the drainage shall be provided to Ball Road, or through
easements and facilities as approved by the City Engineer.
7. That the Covenants, Conditions~ and Restrictions shall be submit-
ted to and approved by the City Attorney"s office prior to City
Council approval of the Final Tract Map, and further, that the
approved Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall be recorded
· concurrently with the Final Tract Map.
8. That Lot No. 70 along the east and west boundaries shall be
designated as Lot."A" on the east boundary and Lot "B" on the
west boundary.
9. That a predetermined price for Lots "A" and "B" shall be calculated
and an agreement for dedication entered into between the Developer
and the City of Anaheim prior to approval of the final tract map.
The cost of Lots "A" and "B" shall include land and a proportionate
share of the underground utilities and street improvements.
10. That Street "A" shall be recorded as Sylvan Street.
Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5521,
Revision No. 1, he approved subject to the recommendations of the
City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
NDTION CARRIED.
CONDItiONAL USE PERMIT NO. 457z (Recla~ificatio.n No, 63-64-%0): Verbal
report and recommendations by the City Attorney, pertaining to request
from Sara D. Hastings, 1447 South Lemon Street, that the existing
masonry wall remain as constructed adjacent to her property was
presented. The City Council took no further action.
CONDITIONAL US~ PERMIT ..NO. 4~8 - REVISED PLANS (RECLASSIFICATION NO.
Submitted hy Robert L. Wurgaft for proposed development to he located
on the south side of Ball Road, approximately 350 feet east of Dale
Avenue. Council consideration of revised plans was continued from the
meeting of April 14, 1964, for further study and investigation.
On report and recommendation of the City Manager, the City
Council directed that the applicant he advised to make further revi-
sion, as the Revised Plans submitted do not conform with City Planning
Commission recommendations as to modification of the cul-de-sac and
setbacks, and reduction in the number of units to provide a minimum
300 square feet of recreation area per unit.
ADJ~NT, Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn, Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED, 10:08 P.M.
x City Clerk