1968/01/16
68-21
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1: 30 P.M.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARR! ED .
r
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $739,047.94, in accordance with the 1967-68 Budget, were approved.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NOS. 93 and 94 (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 63): Public Hearings were continued from the meetings of August
29 and September 26, 1967, at the request of interested parties,for further
consideration of proposed amendments to the Anaheim General Plan Circulation
Elements - Highway Rights-of-Way, establishing the general alignment of Con-
vention Way and Clementine Street, and designating said streets as Secondary
Highways, and further establishing Convention Way between West Street and
Harbor Boulevard as a Major Highway, with exceptions.
Councilman Dutton asked whether experience gained since the open-
ing of the Convention Center had resulted in any changes to the Traffic Cir-
culation Study, which had been instituted prior to the opening.
n
Traffic Engineer, Edward Granzow, reported that the existing por-
tion of Convention Way between Harbor Boulevard and West Street was primar-
ily used as an exit to Harbor Boulevard and West Street for the rear portion
of the Convention Center; that Harbor Boulevard received the majority of the
traffic, due to its connection with the Santa Ana Freeway and other major
routes, and as a result, some problems at the intersection of Katella Avenue
and Harbor Boulevard had been created. He advised that one primary reason
for'extending Convention Way east of Harbor Boulevard would be to disperse
traffic out of the Convention Center, and relieve tra~fic congestion on
Harbor Boulevard.
Councilman Krein left the meeting, 1:40 P.M.
In response to Councilman Schutte's question, Mr. Granzow pointed
out that, as proposed, the extension would ultimately connect to State College
Boulevard, and he noted that as more property developed in the area, there
would be a greater need for traffic circulation.
Mr. Mickelson explained that approval of subject General Plan Amend-
ments would indicate that the street would ultimately be extended as proposed;
that the next step would be to determine the precise alignment of subject ex-
tension so that the owners of property in the area would be informed.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council.
n
Mr. Norman Smedegaard, Attorney, representing the owners of Satel-
lite Mobile Home Estates and Shopping Center, located at the southeast cor-
ner of Katella Avenue and Haster Street, referred to statements made at the
last public hearing on subject amendments, September 26, 1967, by Mr. James
B. Smith, real estate appraiser, estimating that the cost to., the City of
Anaheim for the necessary acquisition of land, not including building im-
provements nor a new overpass for the Freeway, would amount to approximately
$280,000.00, based on present-day value of the existing mobile home park pro-
perty, severance damages, and cost of rehabilitating the park.
Councilman Krein returned to the meeting, 1:47 P.M.
Mr. Smedegaard was of the opinion that the construction of the
previous Katella Avenue Overpass, immediately in front of the mobile home
park and shopping center, had caused considerable loss of business, for
which no compensation was received; that recently the curb had been painted
red in front of their property, which further retarded business; and the
subject proposal would take approximately one and one-half acres off the
back of the mobile home park. It was their feeling that the better way
would be to widen existing streets, in order to improve traffic circula-
tion, and he urged that serious consideration be given to this matter be-
fore Council action was taken.
68-22
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council,
there being no response, declared the hearings closed on General Plan Amend-
ment Nos. 93 and 94.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Krein ex-
pressed the opinion that at the present time too many uncertainties were
evident, relative to the proposed extension of Convention Way.
Councilman Dutton stated that there was no question as to the need
and necessity for the street, and was of the opinion that too long a delay
would render acquisition of right-of-way for adequate traffic circulation
nearly impossible, because of development.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-27: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-27 for
adoption, adopting General Plan Amendment No. 93, establishing Convention
Way from Harbor Boulevard to Haster Street, as a major arterial street, and
Convention Way from Haster Street to Anaheim Boulevard, and Clementine Street
from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue,as standard secondary arterial streets
on the Circulation Element of the General Plan, as recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENT
TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 93.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
come ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
Krein
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-27 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-28: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 68R-28
for adoption, adopting General Plan Amendment No. 94, establishing Convention
Way, between West Street and Harbor Boulevard, as a 55-foot, half-width major
highway, and listing it on the Table of Exceptions of the Circulation Element,
Highway Rights-of-Way, of the General Plan.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMEND-
MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 94.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor delcared Resolution No. 68R-28 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1921: Submitted by Fred and Violet Nason
and Ralph and Barbara Rolapp, requesting permission to erect a roof sign;
with waivers of maximum sign area and maximum height of a roof sign; M-l
zoned property, located at 2500 Miraloma Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-236,
denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commis-
sion was filed by the authorized agent, and public hearing scheduled December
12, 1967, and continued to December 26, 1967, and to this date, at the request
of the applicant.
Pursuant to report of the Zoning Supervisor, verbal request of the
applicants to withdraw petition for Variance No. 1921 was granted, on motion
by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
l
l
1l
68-23
n
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January l6. 1968. l:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-34: Initiated by the Anaheim City
Council proposing deletion of deed restrictions which limit the uses of
the property to certain specified uses, to permit the full range of C-l,
General Commercial Uses; C-1 zoned property located at the northwest cor-
ner of State College Boulevard and Morava Avenue, and having frontages of
approximately 620 feet on State College Boulevard, and approximately 170
feet on Morava Avenue.
Pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-262, the City Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council execute a written consent to the amend-
ment to deed restrictions heretofore imposed by the deletion of said deed
restrictions, subject to the following conditions:
l. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along State College Boulevard and
Morava Avenue, for tree planting purposes.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance
with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public
Works.
3. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro-
perly shielded from view and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent
residential homes.
4. That any lighting that is provided shall be directed down-
ward and away from the property lines.
n
5. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be com-
plied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
6. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be com-
plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, noted the location of subject
property, and the uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention
to Council approval of application for restaurant development on property
adjacent on the north, at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard
and South Street. He briefed the findings of the City Planning Commission
in their recommendation, and noted that C-l site development standards
would provide for and accommodate those uses already existing on subject
properties.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, for
or against subject reclassification, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-29: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-29
for adoption, authorizing the execution of written consent to the deletion
of deed restrictions heretofore imposed on subject property, to allow the
full range of C-l General Commercial Uses, subject to the conditions recom-
mended by the City Planning Commission, changing Condition Nos. 5 and 6
to read as follows:
o
I
68-24
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
"5. That Condition No.1, above. mentioned, shall be complied wi. th
within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City
Council may grant.
6. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be com-
plied with prior to final Building and Zoning inspections."
Refer to Resolution Book.
n
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE REMOVAL
OF CERTAIN DEED RESTRICTIONS FROM THE PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN A CONSENT TO SUCH REMOVAL. (67-68-34).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCIlMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-29 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-36: Submitted by Eugene Metz, request-
ing change of zone from R-A to C-1, to allow development of a commercial office
structure; property located on the west side of Brookhurst Street, between
Lincoln and Crescent Avenues.
Pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-263, the City Planning Commission
recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following con-
ditions:
l. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Brookhurst Street, for street 1
lighting purposes.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of ,~:
Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Brookhurst Street, for tree plant-
ing purposes.
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied
with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly
shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential
homes.
6. That evidence of ownership of subject property shall be submit-
ted to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a Building Permit in order
to determine the necessity for the recordation of an agreement fora mutual
easement over the southerly 25 feet of the property to the north of subject
property.
7. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be com-
plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord-
ancewith plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to n
and CODa idered by the Ci ty PI anning COllllllis s ion. I.~ .c
Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant had new or different evidence to
present, the answer being negative, asked if anyone else wished to address the
City Council.
68-25
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
n
Dr. Charles Hendricks, owner of the Ana-Brook Animal Hospital,
south of subject property, addressed the Council, expressing opposition
to the reclassification, unless a stipulation were made that the develop-
ment be set back from the property line so as not to block the animal hos-
pital from view of southbound traffic. He advised that in 1961 the County
of Orange required them to construct their facility with a 75-foot setback;
that the motel which had been developed adjacent on the south had used a
50-foot setback, which partially blocked the hospital from view of northbound
traffic. Further, that most of their business came from walk-in traffic,
and they were restricted from installing a sign larger than the one they
presently had, pursuant to veterinary ethics.
Dr. Hendricks submitted photographs of their facility, illustrat-
ing the setback. He pointed out that same of the parking proposed for the
rear portion of the property could be relocated to the front, thereby allow-
ing a 50-foot front building setback. He further expressed objection to a
six-foot wall being placed between the proposed development and the animal
hospital.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council in
rebuttal.
Mr. David Hook, 1786 West Lincoln Avenue, developer, addressed the
Council, advising that the building could be constructed at a 50-foot front
setback, however, the intent was to avoid an "asphalt jungle," and keep
parking to the rear of the building. He noted that they would have no signs,
and was of the opinion that the sign in front of the animal hospital would
be sufficient identification. Further, that the proposed development was
planned in accordance with provisions of the C-l Site Development Standards
of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
n
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Coun-
cil, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Councilman Chandler
failed to see the need for the animal hospital to'be seen by moving traffic,
so long as their sign was visible.
Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the hospital should have
the best identification sign possible.
Mr. Thompson noted that a block wall would not be required, but
would be permissible between the two properties.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-30: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-30 for
adoption, authorizing preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-36,
C-l).
n
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
68-26
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-30 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-86: Request of Harold Hirsh, dated December 27, 1967,
was submitted, requesting removal of deed restrictions on Lot 1 of Tract No.
4620; Lots 1, 2, and 3, of Tract No. 4621; and Lot 1 of Tract No. 4617; said
restrictions recorded as condition of Reclassification No. 60-61-86; proper-
ties described as located on the north and west sides of Greenleaf Avenue,
and on the south side of Glenoaks Avenue, between Chippewa Avenue and the
Santa Ana Freeway.
n
Report dated January 16, 1968, was submitted from the Development
Services Department, Zoning Division, recommending that said reclassifica-
tion be granted, without the necessity of a public hearing, and setting forth
reasons therefor.
On the recommendations of the Development Services Department, Council-
man Dutton moved that the removal of deed restrictions, without the necessity of
a public hearing, be approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign
necessary consent thereto. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS - CITY CHARTER: Communication dated January 5, 1968, from
John F. Simpson, was submitted, requesting that the following proposed amend-
ments be placed on the ballot for the 1968 Municipal Election:
STEP ONE: Providing for the election of the mayor by the people be estab-
lishing that position as a separate and distinct office within the Council.
This is more easily accomplished by eliminating the overlapping terms of the
council members, thus requiring all council members, including the mayor to
stand for election at the same time.
The changes are:
l. The office of mayor shall be established as a member of the n
council, elected hy a majority vote of the people for that specific pod tion L
and performing the same duties enumerated in the existing charter.
2. The terms of office for all members of the council, including
the mayor, shall be for two years from the date of election. These terms
shall begin and end on the same dates for all councilmen.
3. The membership of the council shall be limited to five, the
mayor and four councilmen, all elected at large until the official popula-
tion of the city reaches 165,000.
STEP TWO: Providing for the election of all councilmen, except the mayor,
from districts or areas. The mayor, as in step one, shall be elected at
large. This is accomplished after the official population of the city reaches
165,000, by increasing the size of the council to seven members and dividing
the city into three areas. Each area would be represented by two councilmen.
The term of office remains at two years as in step one.
The changes are:
l. At the next election after the official population of the city
reaches l65,000, the membership of the council shall be raised to seven, the
mayor elected at large and six councilmen elected from districts.
2. At that time the city shall be divided into three districts of
approximately equal population.
3. Each district shall be represented by two councilmen elected
by the people of that district.
n
Councilman Dutton reported that Mr. Simpson had telephoned him the
previous evening, to advise he would be unable to be present today, and to re-
quest that if the City Council determined to place these issues on the April
ballot, that the City Attorney's office reword them in accordance with correct
terminology.
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, sub-
ject communication, setting forth proposed changes in the Anaheim City Charter,
was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED.
68-27
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
ENTIRTAINHENT PERMIT APPLICATION: Application filed by William Harold Stoops,
for entertainment permit to allow Go-Go-type dancers and topless entertain-
ment at Tap City Restaurant, 1116 Fountain Way, was submitted.
n
The Chief of Police recommended that said application be denied,
due to the fact that it would be in direct violation of Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 4.18.060, and very probably in violation of the State law.
Mr. Dean Pic'l, 140 West College Street, Covina, attorney repre-
senting the applicant, asked consideration of the following two points:
1. With regard to recommendations of the Chief of Police, Mr.
Pic'l was of the opinion that no State law existed which would prohibit the
requested "topless" entertainment. He referred to his letter, dated Decem-
ber 28, 1967, setting forth the opinion that Section 4.18.060 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code was void, under terms of the United States Constitution.
2. If the City Council denied the "topless" entertainment, since
the application requested permit for two types of entertainment, it was re-
quested that the "Go-Go" dancing be approved.
Mr. Pic'l briefed several similar cases in the State of California,
and the disposition thereof by the Courts.
The City Attorney was of the opinion that inasmuch as a single en-
tertainment permit application was filed, denial in toto was the correct
procedure, if a portion of said permit was not acceptable. The applicant
could proceed to file a separate application for that portion of the enter-
tainment, and the City Council could act separately.
n
With reference to the laws governing "topless" entertainment, Mr.
Geisler advised that the right of the City to regulate such entertainment
had not been determined, however, in his opinion, the type of dancing pro-
posed by the applicant might be in violation of Section 647-A of the Penal
Code.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. en-
tertainment permit submitted by William Harold Stoops was denied. MOTION
CARRIED.
ORANGE COUNTY ZONE CHANGE NO. ZC67-48: Petitioner - M.L. Whaley, et aI, propos-
ing change of zone from R-1, Single-family residence, and R-P, Residential-
Professional Districts, to the C-l Local Business District, for properties
located on the west side of Brookhurst Street, extending from Harriet Lane
on the north, to and including the one parcel south of Pacific Avenue,
(southwest Anaheim area).
Excerpts of the minutes from the City Planning Commission meeting
held January 15. 1968, were submitted, recommending that the Orange County
Planning Commission be urged to deny Orange County Zone Change No. ZC67-48,
and setting forth reasons therefor.
n
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
the City Council concurred with recommendations of the Planning Commission,
and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-31 - WORK ORDER NO. 102: Upon receipt of certification from
the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-31
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
68-28
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES -Januarv 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND ~UIPMENTAND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL ,AND
WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN
IN THE OLIVE HILLS PARK SITE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 102. .
(Sully-Miller Contracting Co.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-3l duly passed and adopted.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Edward George, attorney representing Adele
L. Mulligan, for personal injury damages purportedly received on City-owned
property, on or about September 19, 1967, was denied, as recommended by the
City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance agent, on motion by Council-
man Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton:
a. City of Tustin - regarding their position in the efforts of
Huntington Beach to detach from Orange County Harbor District.
b. Houston I. Flournoy, State Controller - Summary of Apportion-
ments of Motor Vehicle License Fees for the Period June 1, 1967, through
November 30, 1967.
c. Annual Report - Building Division - 1966 and 1967.
d. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of November,1967.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2464: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2464 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (8) - C-R).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENI':
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2464 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2465: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2465 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (9) - C-R).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2465 duly passed and adopted.
D
[]
J
n
n
n
68-29
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januarv 16. 1968. 1: 30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 2466: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2466 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI.;.
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-26 - C-2).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN :
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley.
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2466 duly pas$ed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2468: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2468 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
cIpAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-31 - P-l).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2468 duly passed and adopted.
DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-66: 6n motion
by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, dedication of Vehicular
Access Rights to Euclid Street, by Genowefa Hurley Mc Dade, in connection
with Reclassification No. 66-67-66 was accepted by the City Council, and
the recordation thereof was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2469: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2469 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 - C-l).
ORDINANCE NO. 2470: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2470 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS SUNKIST ANNEXATION.
(Uninhabited).
Mrs. Ann Madison requested permission to address the Council,
advising that she represented the owners of property included in the Sun-
kist Annexation, and she questioned whether subject property could not be
annexed under the Uninhabited Act, without the necessity of the delay re-
sulting from two readings of the annexation ordinance and thirty days refer-
endum period thereafter.
The City Attorney reported that all annexations were adopted by
ordinance, under the laws of the State of California, and there-was no ex-
isting law or authority for approval of an annexation by resolution.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were pre-
sented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their infor-
mation:
68 -30
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
A. Application submitted by Theodore Stephen Kosarenko, for New
On-Sale Beer License at the Golden Key, 2625 West Lincoln Avenue, (C-2 zone)..
B. Application submitted by Robert Joseph McAvoy, for New On-Sale
General License, at the Jolly Roger, 2250 East Lincoln Avenue, (C-l zone;
Conditional Use Permit No. 9l3).
C. Application submitted by Bonnie H. and Kenneth L. Payne, for :.n..I.. .
Person-to-Person Transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, at Ken's Market, .
1150 North East Street, (C-l zone).
No action was taken on the foregoing applications.
ANAHEIM DISPOSAL COMPANY - EXTENSION OF ODNTRACT: Assistant City Manager, Robert
Davis, referred to memorandum report, dated January 2, 1968, received from
Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, relative to the proposal of
C.V..Taormina, Anaheim Disposal Company, for five-year extension, at no in-
crease in price to existing contract for the collection and disposal of rub-
bish and waste materials in the commercial areas of the City, (copies fur-
nished each Councilman). Also noted was communication dated December l6,
1967, from Mr. Paul T. Havens, requesting that a public bid be taken when
the current contract expires.
It was Mr. Davis' recommendation that inasmuch as the City had been
satisfied with the service under the existing contract, and the price compared
favorably with those in other nearby cities, that the contract not be let
for public bid at this time.
At the conclusion of brief Council discussion, Councilman Krein moved
that the contract with Anaheim Disposal Company be renewed fora period of five
years, (expires June 30, 1973). Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED .
n
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: Mr. Robert
Davis reported that the State of California, Division of Highways, wishes
to acquire a right-of-way through City-owned property located on Pinney
Drive. Further, the City Council previously established a value of $25,000.00
per acre, and the State has offered $22,259.00 per acre and wishes to commence
eminent domain proceedings so that an independent appraisal can be obtained.
It was determined by the City Council that there were no objections
to the proposed project or the taking of land for right-of-way purposes; how-
ever, it did object to the value established by the State.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that the
City Council go on record as not objecting to the filing of condemnation pro-
ceedings by the State of California on subject property. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-32: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 68R-32 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THEREDF.
(Thorobred Racing Plate Company - Portion of Yorba Substation Site).
Roll Call Vote:
1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-32 duly passed and adopted.
68-31
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-33: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-33 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
n
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 67R-404 AND AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS
JOB CLASSES. (Line Truck Operator).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-33 duly passed and adopted.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten-minute recess to Execu-
tive Session to consider a personnel matter. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:15 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-34: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 68R-34 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 63R-910. (Personnel R~les).
n
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-34 duly passed and adopted.
INSURANCE - EMPLOYEES~ COMPENSATION: Councilman Dutton requested that the City
Manager's office investigate and report to the Council on possible savings
if the City converted to a self-insurance program, in lieu of State Work-
men's Compensation Insurance.
No objections were expressed by the City Council.
PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: Mayor Pebley was granted permission to leave the
State for a period of sixty days, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded
by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED:
3:45 P.M.
n
SIGNllDQ_~ _ h. V~ :'~.....,I
City Clerk