Loading...
1968/05/07 68-224 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend S. Donald Ganstrom, of Bethel Baptist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Clark led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INTRODUCTION - NEW EMPLOYEES: Mr. Ned Paulionis, of the City Personnel Depart- ment, introduced six new employees. On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Pebley welcomed the new employees to the City Family. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamatiohs were issued by Mayor Pebley: "Hire A Veteran Week" - May 12 to 18, 1968. "Hospital Week" - May 12 to 18, 1968. "Conquer Multiple Sclerosis Month" - May 12 to June 16, 1968. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held April 23, 1968, were ap- proved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such or- dinance or resolution. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in th~ amount of $7l8,2l4.73, in accordance with the 1967-68 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARIN~ - ABANDONMENT NO. 66-3A: Public hearing was held on proposed abandon- ment of a portion of a dedicated roadway easement, known as Gum Road, located south and east of Euclid Street and Katella Avenue, pursuant to Resolution No. 68R-2ll, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin on April 25, 1968, and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wLshed to address the City Council. Mr. Bill Droessler, 1598 West Katella Avenue, owner of adjacent pro- perty on the east, addressed the City Council, requesting clarification of the proposed abandonment. He stated that at the time he purchased his property, it was with the understanding that he would have future access to Gum Road, for traffic circulation to Katel1a Avenue from his property, in accordance with de- velopment plans he had presented to the City Planning Commission. City Engineer, James P. Maddox, briefed the history of subject pro- perty, advising that Gum Road had never been improved or used, and abandonment thereof was approved June 14, 1966, however, the legal description had inad- vertently omitted Lot No.9, across which that portion of the easement in ques- tion was located; that the abandonment now proposed was for the purpose of cartying out the original intent to abandon the entire easement, and he noted n l n 68-225 City Hall. Anaheim. California ~ CO~IL MINUTES -Hav 7. 1968. l:30 P.M. there was a solid curb on Kate11, Avenue, where subject easement terminated. Copy of the parking lafout referred m by Mr. Droessler, was re- viewed by the City Council and dtscussion held, the matter being deferred to a later hour for further inve,tigation. r Later in the meeting "f. Maddox further reported that at the pre- sent time two block walls were located on the east side of subject easement, one having been constructed by tbe Euclid Shopping Center, and the other a wall belonging to the residenti_l structure currently being used for com- mercial purposes by Mr. Droessler. At the time the subdivision, (Tract No. 3240), east of the easement developed, the easterly half (20 feet) of the street easement was eliminated, leaving the westerly half currently under consideration. ' Mr. Alvin Levy, of Technological Engineering Corporation, repre- senting Euclid Shopping Center, addressed the Council, advising that they had originally requested abandonment of the remaining portions of Gum Road adjac~nt to their property, and subsequently, believing that had been com- pletely accomplished, they constfucted their wall on the east side of the easement, a requirement of their development. He thereupon requested that the abandonment be approved. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Coun- cil. Mr. Droessler returned'to the stand, pointing out that if he would have no access to Gum Road, when his office building was constructed, he would be severely limited for t~affic circulation on his property. He fur- ther objected to the fact that the shopping center could construct buildings to a point ten feet from his property line, if the abandonment were approved. I l It was explained that if the residential structure on Mr. Droessler's property were removed, he could construct a commercial structure up to with- in ten feet of his side of the Property line. Mr. Joe Fernandez, xesident of the City of Orange, requested per- mission to address the Council a~d asked if Mr. Droessler would be able to construct a driveway along subj~ct easement if the property were not aban- doned to the Euclid Shopping Cen~er. The parking layout was again reviewed by the Council, and Mr. Geisler pointed out that the easterly twenty feet of the Gum Road easement had previously been abandoned to Mr. Droessler's property, and was included within his fenced lot. He further explained the procedure of abandoning easements to the abutting owners in fee, and the fact that the City of Anaheim would not have the authority to abandon the subject property ~to any- one," ," but would abandon their right to use the property for public pur- poses; the abutting property owner, who owns the property in fee, would be responsible for the abandoned ar~a thereafter. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-234: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-234 for adoption, approving subject .bandonment as requested. n I ' I I Refer to Resolution BOQk. A RESOL~TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACA- TION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF GUM. ROAD AND AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFtER DESCRIBED REAL PRO- PERTY. (No. 66-3A; Street Eas~~ent extending southerly from Katel1a Ave- nue, east of Euclid Street, Lot 9.) Roll Call Vote: I ~ ~: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Nope 68-226 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-234 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1964: Submitted by Adventure Inn, Incorporated, re- questing permission to erect two free-standing signs, with waivers of maximum height and location.of a free-standing sign, and maximum area of free-standing signs; C-R zoned property, located at 1414 South Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-92, ap- proved said Variance, in part, permitting the sign along Manchester Avenue, at its proposed location in accordance with revised plans presented, and denying waiver of the area of a free-standing sign for Harbor Boulevard frontage; the requested waiver of the maximum height of the Manchester Avenue sign being with- drawn by the petitioner. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Heath and Company, on behalf of National General Corporation, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, noted the location of subject pro- perty and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mr. Thompson briefed the findings of the City Planning Commission, and reported on revised plans for the Manchester Avenue sign, advising that it would be scaled down to 373 square feet. That under the Anaheim Municipal Code, the Harbor Boulevard sign was allowed 204 square feet, for the 102 foot frontage, and the sign approved by the City Council, under a temporary permit (April 2, 1968 Minutes, page 68-165), was approximately 532 square feet in area, and 35 feet high. Mayor Pebley asked. if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. Mr. Richard M. Crane, representing National General Corporation, called attention to the fact that the original proposal for the Harbor Boulevard front- age was a 650 square-foot sign, which was subsequently reduced; that in addition to the 102 foot frontage,they leased a parcel with 64 feet of frontage, which cannot be included, since it is not on a long-term lease. In response to Mayor Pebley's question, Mr. Crane advised that the Corporation is satisfied with the signs as they presently exist. The Mayor asked if anyone had opposition to present. Mr. James Edmundson, proprietor of the Howard Johnson Motor Lodge, across the street to the north, pointed out that at the time they constructed their facility, they would like to have had a large sign; however, they confined themselves to what was allowable under the Anaheim Municipal Code. He stated that since the installation of the Harbor Boulevard sign by National General Corporation, the Howard Johnson sign is no longer visible to northbound traffic and, in his opinion, the sign ordinance was provided for all to follow. Mr. Edmundson further advised that he was a tenant in a restaurant which was to be constructed on the same property as the theatre, and he was of the opinion that the restaurant was as much entitled to a full amount of sign- ing as was the theatre. He displayed a site plan, prepared approximately two years earlier by the ~a~ional Genoral Corporation architects, illustrating both facilities on the. property, and noted that the Bui1dinS Pennit for the restaur- ant had been issued and construction was about to commence; that he would prob- ably be requesting a sign variance at a later date, and a part of his objection to subject variance was a concern that the north portion of the Harbor Boulevard entertainment area, for which signing had been retained in good taste, would be turned into a "Sign Jungle," as was the southerly portion of the street. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Edmundson stated that the theatre and the restaurant would share the same parking facility, fronting on Harbor Boulevard, although the restaurant would be oriented to Manchester Avenue; that when the temporary sign permit was previously granted to the applicant, it was stipulated that they would assume full responsibility for removal of the signs, if the variance.ere re1ected. A' -, i J l -, ; 'I . 68-227 City Hall. Anaheim. California - G9VNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The Mayor asked if .~yone else wished to speak in opposition, there being no response, call,d for rebuttal. r Mr. Crane stated that he failed to see how the Motor Lodge could be opposed to the Harbor Bou1ev,rd sign. He noted the difference in the type of signing used by theatre, and other commercial facilities, includ- ing the fact that the current Pfogram must be prominently displayed on theatre ~arquees; that the vari,nce application was for release from an ordinance which did not meet tht situation. That they believe that they have complied with the intent at the ordinance, and would like to have had a much higher sign. Mr. Crane further advi,ed that the plans for the new restaurant were larger than, and not in accprdance with the agreement with National General Corporation and the prop,rty owner; that the property owner requires that any signing for th, restaurant not interfere with the theatre signing. The Mayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO 68R-235: Councilm.n Dutton stated he agreed, in essence, with the comments on the many sisns on Harbor Boulevard. However, he pointed out that a temporary permit was approved by the Council for sub- ject signs, and previous actions of the City Council have demonstrated that they were not in complete agreement with the sign ordinance, as it pertains to theatres. He thereupon offet'ed Resolution No. 68R-235 for adoption, approving Variance No. 1964, to allow the Harbor Boulevard sign as it presently exists; the Manchester Avenue sign to be revised in accord- ance with plans dated this date, and signed by the City Clerk. Refer to Resolution-Book. I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1964. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Du~ton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None NOlle The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-235 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION No. 67-68-66: Submitted by Mikagi Nakamura, requesting change of zone from R~A to C-1; property located at 2109 West Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-96, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: I 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for tree plant- ing purposes. . 3. That the si.dewalks and driveways shall be installed. along Lincoln Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in t~e office of the City Engin- eer. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- ther time as the City Council may grant. 68-228 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. 7. That the parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting, and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential in- tegrity of the area. 8. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 9. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and noted that the proposed zon- ing would be in conformance with the General Plan. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his representative wished to ad- dress the City Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the petitioner, stated that he had little to add, except that the properties extending easterly from Brook- hurst Street w~re nearly all commercial uses, with the exception of subject pro- perty and the one adjacent on the west. The Mayor called for opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-236: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-236 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-66 - C-l.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-236 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-67.AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1019: Submitted by Edward and Vivian Simoneaux, Ephrem and Rose A. La Plante, and Emily E. O'Keefe, requesting change of zone from R-l to C-l, and permission to establish an automobile service station within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waivers of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family resi- dential zone, and maximum permitted sign height; property described as. those lots fronting on the east side of Magnolia Avenue, between Crescent and Glencrest Avenues, (604-608 and 612 North Magnolia Avenue.) The City Clerk read communications received in her office, May 6, 1968, from E.B. Schultz, authorized agent, requesting continuance of subject public hearing for 30 days, inasmuch as the petitioners would be unable to be present. On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Schutte, public hearing was continued to June ll" 1968, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. Due to a possible conflict of interests, Councilman Schutte withdrew from the discussion and action on the foll~ing items, 2:20 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68~69 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1020: Submitted by Alan and Marjorie Talt, Herbert and Shirley Botsford, and Marvin'and Luana Fluegge, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to es- tablish a 35-unit, planned residential development, with waiver of permitted location of an accessory building; property located on the east side of Euclid Street, and north of the Orange County Flood Control Channel, (south of Kate11a Avenue.) l l ~ I J 68-229 City Hall. Anaheim. California - CO~~fL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. l:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-97, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject" to the following condf.tions: l 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet ~n width, from the centerline of the street, along Euclid Street, for street widening purposes. 2. That street improv~ent plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Euclid Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili- ties, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guar- antee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of An&heim the sum of 15~ per front foot along Euclid Street, for tree plant- ing purposes. 5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anah~im the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and rec- reation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period.of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. The City Planning Co~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-98, granted said conditional use pe~it, subject to the following conditions: l 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-69. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 5. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2, and 3. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the ex- isting uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing ~he evidence sub- mitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the proposed development, there being no response, de- clared the hearing closed. r RESOLUTION NO. 68R-237: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-237 for adoptirm, authoT.'izi.oe prer~,.ati(ln of ".t'>cel:l~~ry nrrtjm\nce, ch8nging dt& zone as reques.ted" subject to the conditions recommended by the City Plannin~ Commission: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING 1'0 ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-69- R-3.) Roll Call Vote: 68-230 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-237 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-238: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-238 for adoption, l. granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1020, subject to recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. l020. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-238 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-70 AND VARIANCE NO. 1965. (General Plan Amendment No. 31): Submitted by Alan and Marjorie Talt, requesting change of zone from County A-I to R-3, and also requesting waivers of maximum building height within l50-feet of a single-family residential zone, minimum side yard setback, carport location, and minimum distance between buildings; property extending southerly from the south side of Ball Road to the north side of Winston Road, the westerly boundary being east of State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-108, recommended that subject reclassification be approved for Portion A only, sub- ject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, 'from the centerline of the street, along Ball Road, for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineer- ing requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs and gut- ters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appur- tenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accord- ance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a b0nd in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Ana- heim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engin- eering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road, for street lighting pur- poses. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of l5~ per front foot, along Ball Road, for tree planting purposes. 5. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject pro- perty be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange'County Recorder. 6. That tne owners of subject propercy shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum 6~ $25.00 per dwe11ih~ unit, to be use~ for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building.Permit is issued. 7. That Condition Nos. l, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of l80 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal.description, and containing a map of the property. 9. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopted as and when each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. -, ~ I j l 1 68-231 City Hall. Anaheim. California - CO~~IL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1968. l:30 P.M. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l09, the City Planning Commission recommended that the requested .,iver of yard and building setback require- ments, and minimum distances bet~een buildings be denied under subject Var- iance, and the waiver of buildi~' and structural height limitations be ap- proved fo~ Portion A only, subj.,t to the following conditions: n l ' 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-70. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building and zoning inspect~ons. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 3l: A proposal to change the General Plan desig- nation from industrial to medium-density residential, with the area bounded by Ball Road, Orange Freeway, Ce~ritos Avenue and State College Boulevard. Said Amendment was considered in conjunction with Reclassification No.64- 65-15 and Conditional Use Permit No. 610, on October 20, 1964, and was de- nied by the Ci ty Council. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-107, the City Planning Commission recommended that the denial of s\lbject General Plan Amendment, (Resolution No.. 64R-770) be rescinded, and said Amendment be approved in accordance with Exhibit "D." I Planning Supervisor, Ronald Grudzinski, briefed the history of prior zoning applications in the area and General Plan Amendment No. 31. He noted that the question raised was whether it is in the best long range interests of the community to reserve the area in question for industrial development, in accordance with the Land Use Policy adopted for the South- east Industrial Area, April 10, 1962. Mr. Grudzinski referred to the four exhibits of the proposed General Plan Amendment, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, pointing out the difference in acreages proposed for Medium Density, Mul- tiple-Family Residential use. He refert'etl-~ Exhibit "D", prepared in conjunction with subject reclassification, de~~ng Medium Density, Mul- tiple-Family Residential on apprpximately thirty-eight acres, located on the south side of Ball Road, between State College Boulevard and Sunkist Street. .By comparison, Exhibit "c" proposed to designate the same area, extending south to Winston Road, encompassing l53 acres. The impact of residential population could create a need for 4 to 8 acres of additional park land. Points of the staff report relative to Public Hearing held by the City Planning Commission on General Plan Amendment No. 31, revised, were noted. Also briefly reported upon were various issues considered by the City Planning Commission should subject reclassification be approved, such as drainage, the traffic flow, etc. ~ Mr. .Grudzinski pointed out that the future interchange at Ball Road and Lne Orange Freeway wOulu rG~illtate traffic entering the indus- 'rrta1 district. Mayor Pebley asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the Cit~ Council. Mr. A.J. Schutte, 420 North Loara Street, addressed the Council, representing the petitioners, a4vising that they were in favor of the General Plan Amendment extendina only from Sunkist Street to the west side of subject property. He pointed out that the petitioners would be dedicat- ing a portion of their property for a street, while he, as owner of adja- cent property on the east, intended to make a dedication for the extension of Sunkist Street southerly. 68-232 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Schutte advised that he had been informed by representatives of Pacific Scientific Products, (southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Winston Road), that they were concerned about the property to the north. Mr. Schutte felt the reclassification should extend to Winston Road, as the natural flow of water was south to Winston Road; the north five acres to be the first stage of development. He pointed out the increase in their property tax, and further reported that they have received no offers for their land for industrial use. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in favor of subject applications. Mr. Albert Tousseau, 6672 Richfield Road, owner of property adjacent to subject property on the west, addressed the Council in support of Mr. Schutte's position, and was of the opinion that some relief from the industrial use desig- nation in the area was necessary, and the Low Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential uses would be compatible. Further, that the drainage problem could be corre,cted with a good development. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. R.H. Lincoln, representing the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Indus- trial Committee, advi~ed that the Committee was working with the City of Anaheim for an ambitious industrial program, and they felt that the parcel-by-parcel elimination of the potential M-l area could be extremely detrimental to the de- velopment of industry in the city, and subject property is in a prime industrial area with potential freeway access. Brief discussion was held relative to the conclusions set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission, dated April 8, 1968, and the sta- tistics which pointed out that an estimated 77 percent of the people employed in local industry reside outside of the City of Anaheim. Councilman Clark noted the difficulties evident in many zoning requests for R-3 development in close. proximity to single-family homes. Subject property, in his opinion, was ideally situated for a R-3 project without adversely affect- ing anyone. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Merrill Skilling, representing Nortronics, 500 East Orangethorpe Avenue, called attention to the two Nortronics facilities in the vicinity of State College Boulevard and Cerritos Avenue, advising that they searched the southern area of the State for' an ideal location before selecting these sites; that they were chosen because they were suited to their purposes and situated in a prime industrial area, designated by a General Plan. Mr. Skilling advised that Nortronics was the first aerospace industry in the city seventeen years ago, and he was of the opinion that industrial de- velopment required the minimum of city services, as opposed to residential de- velopment; and is instrumental in maintaining a low personal property tax rate. He requested that the present General Plan designation of light industry for the southeast area be retained without encroachment by residential use, thereby pro- viding potential expansion by existing and new industries in the area. Mr. Robert Kottman, Production Manager, Pacific Scientific Company, 1346 South State College Boulevard, south of the area being considered in sub- ject application,' a~vised that they moved their plant ~rom another city for the sole reason that this area was zoned for industrial uses, and protected by the General Plan. He submitted, for Council review, a map illustrating recent in- dustrial development in the area, and pointed out that they owned additional land to the south of the present facility, reserved for future expansions. Mr. Kottman was of the opinion that there is a good potential for ad- ditional industrial development in the area and residential traffic would con- flict with the developed industrial traffic pattern. l l l 68-233 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNyIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Regarding the drainage problem, Mr. Kottman advised that any de- velopment of subject property wtll have to take this problem into consider- ation, particularly on Winston ..ad. He displayed a photograph of the street fronting Pacific Scientific Company during a recent rainstorm, de~ picting the drainage problem in the area. n In conclusion, Mr. Kottman called attention to the discussion by the City Planning Commission concerning possible limitation of residential traffic generated by the propose4 development to Ball Road access only. He requested the General Plan not be changed, and as a compromise, if changed, and the R-3 zoning is granted, it be limited to the north half of subject property, (Portion "A".) Mr. Stahl, Office Manager, Neville Chemical Company, advised that their facility had been in the City for seventeen years, and he con- curred with previous statements relative to the fact that this is prime industrial land, particularly with the good railroad service available. He noted that Ball Road was presently becoming a major route to the in- dustrial district; that the bulk of industrial traffic would use the Ball Road, new Orange Freeway interchange. The present and future industrial traffic on Ball Road will present problems should residential use, adja- cent to Ball Road, be permitted. In conclusion, Mr. Stahl, on behalf of the company he represents, recommended further study be made by the City Council before making a decision on the issue of changing the General Plan Amendment to allow residential encroachment into the Southeast Industrial Area. Mayor Pebley left the meeting, 3:17 P.M. Acting Mayor Pro Tem Krein asked if anyone else wished to ad- dress the City Council. n Mr. Robert S. McMichael, Authorized Agent for the petitioners, addressed the Council, being of the opinion that when Sunkist Street is extended southerly, a better traffic pattern would be established; that if the industrial land develops .t the same pace as it has last year, it would take ninety years to develop the area designated for industrial use. In his opinion, industrial developers do not wish to extend manufacturing facilities north to Ball Road. Mr. McMichael felt the City Planning Commission merely moved the problem by not extending the multiple zone to Winston Road. In answer to Councilman Dutton's questioning, Mr. McMichael ad- vised that they planned no east~est street through the proposed develop- ment; however, a north-south street was projected; that the present de- velopment plans would not be adaptable to Portion "A" only, without re- vision; and they were holding said plans in abeyance, pending determina- tion on whether both portions would be approved for R-3 zoning. Mr. Schutte returned to the speaker's stand and reported that many parcels of land in this general area had been on the market for years with no offers for purchase. n Mr. Ed Leahy, Assistant District Freight and Passenger Agent for Southern Pacific Railroad, owners of industrial land in the area, ex- pressed concern that a pattern of rezoning had recently become evident in the district,and cited the hotel project approved for the southwest corner of Ball Road and State College Boulevard; 'as an example. He noted that the proposed zoning would bring R-3 development on Portion "B" next to the existing railroad right-of-way. He expressed, from experience, the opinion that potential developers preferred land isolated in industrial tracts, re- served for that purpose. He thereupon requested serious consideration to the rejection of residential zoning south at Ball Road. Mr. Tousseau returned to comment on odor problems experienced created by the Neville Chemical Company, and expressed concern that new industries could cause additional problems. -1 i 68 - 234 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Mayor Pebley returned to the meeting, 3:30 P.M. Mr. Stahl, of Neville Chemical Company, advised that they had made every effort to control this problem, and he cited various measures taken to control any offensive chemical odors, etc. Mr. Schutte was of the opinion that the Southern Pacific Railroad, one of the largest industrial land owners, was evidence that there was more industrial land zoned than can be developed. l J Mr. Joseph Mullin, 526 South Bond Street, addressed the Council as an interested citizen concerning the General Plan, stating that he would not like to be restricted in the disposition of his property by a General Plan; that it appeared, at the time the General Plan was adopted, someone accepted the potential industrial designation for subject property. He noted that cer- tain property owners now want a change, and questioned whether anyone had the right to prevent the property owner from developing his land in the manner he desires. Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and called attention to find- ings of the Commission. He noted that the Planning Commission felt Portion "B" should be retained for future industrial development, in accordance with their prior approval of the General Plan Amendment. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. Councilman Krein moved that Council determination on the public hear- ing be continued for four weeks for further study of subject petitions, includ- ing the entire area in question. Further discussion washeld, and Councilman Dutton stated he would like an "in depth" study prepared of the entire area, including information on the impact of multiple housing vs. industry, and why a high percentage of the people working in local industry. reside elsewhere; projected buffering, the drainage situation, together with projected traffic circulation, and thereupon seconded the motion. l Councilman Clark was of the opLnLon that the proposed development would be compatible with the area, and suggested approving the reclassification and variance for Portion "A" as recommended, and withhold decision on Portion' "B" pending results of the requested study. Mr. Grudzinski reported that it was brought out at the Planning Com- mission hearing that the small percentage figure of those working in local in- dustry living in Anaheim was relatively average, and that Anaheim's two large industrial areas also support other communities. The foregoing motion failed to carry by the following roll.call vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Krein Clark and Pebley S.chutte RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a fifteen-minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. K>TION CARRIED. (3: 55 P.M.) l AFTER RECESS: Maybt Pebley called the meeting to order, oal1' members of the City Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Schutte. After determining the minimum length of time necessary for said in- depth study, Councilman Krein restated his previous motion, changing the con- tinuance of decision to two weeks, (May 21, 1968, l:30 P.M.), for further study and report. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Schutte returned to the Council Table, 4:20 P.M. n n r l ; 68-235 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. , ~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-7l: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to consider change of zone 'from Orange County A-1 to R~A; pro- perty extending southerly from Ball Road to the north side of Winston Road, east of State College Boulevard, and as described in Reclassification No. 67~68-70 and Variance No. 1965 (R-3 Zone requested.) (Ball-Winston Annexation.) The City Planning Commisaion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68- 104, recommended approval of said reclassification. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against subject reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. It was noted that Ordinance No. 2509, approving the Ball-Winston Annexation, was adopted by the City Council April 30, 1968; that subject reclassification would establish permanent R-A zoning on subject annexa- tion, pending Council action on Reclassification No. 67-68-70. ORDINANCE NO. 2514: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2514 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- cIpAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-7l - R-A.) PUBLIC DANCE PERMITS: The following applications for Public Dance Permits were submitted and granted, subject to Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code,as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. Application submitted by Gonzalo Vasquez, on behalf of Socie- dad Progresista Mexicana, Inc., #25, Westminster, for permit to conduct public dance at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, June 2, 1968. b. Application submitted by Carmen D. Sanchez, on behalf of Sociedad Ignacio Zaragoza, for permit to conduct public dance, May 19, 1968, at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT: Application submitted by C.S. Brewer, Advance Industrial Security, requesting permission to conduct a contract industrial guard ser- vice in the City of Anaheim, was submitted and granted, subject to the pro- visions of Chapter 4.60, A~M.C., as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton" secon4ed by Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 5826: Developer - E & C Development Company; tract lo- cated between Riverdale Avenue and the Riverside Freeway, east of B1uerock Street, and contains 64 R~l zoned lots. The City Engineer reported said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees, paid, and he recommended approval thereof. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein moved that Final Map, Tract No. 5826 be approved. Councilman Dutton second- ed the motion. MOTION CARRIED. . . . . .. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-239 - WORK ORDER NO. 543-B: Councilman Krein offered Reso- lution No. 68R-239 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF BALL ROAD, FROM FLORE STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 355 FEET THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 543-B, APPROVING TllI DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AutHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION p~ ~AID PUBLIC I~VJHENT IN ACCOIDANCE.WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE IN- VITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCtION THEREOF. 68-236 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. (Bids to be opened May 29, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCIIMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-239 duly passed and adopted. l RESOLUTION NO. 68R-240 - WORK ORDER NO. 196: Upon receipt of Certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-240 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOW- ING PUBLIC IMPROVI!MENT, TO WIT: MAXWELL PARK LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 196. (Smith Electric Supply.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-240 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: The Assistant City Manager reported on proposed purchase of four additional il.... Police Units, for the Detective Division, finding that the low bid for 'the . twelve units authorized by the City Council, April 30, 1968, was ~cPeek Plymouth, and they have quoted the same cost for the additional units. On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that four additional Police Units be authorized from McPeek Ply- mouth, in the total amount of $9,250.50, including tax. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by the Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California, on behalf of Matthew J. Kolmos, for damages to ve- hicle purportedly resulting from accident with City-owned vehicle on or about March 1, 1968, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered re- ferred to the insurance agent, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-33 (2): . On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, dedication of vehicular ac- cess rights to Ball Road, by Alvie Lee and Virginia Ruth Starmer, in connection with Reclassification No. 67-68-33 (2), was accepted by the City Council, and the recordation thereof authorized. MOTION CARRIED. DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-26: On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, dedication of vehicular access rights to Sunkist Street by Wright, Ltd., a Nevada Corporation, in connection with Reclassifieation No. 64-65-26,'was accepted by th~ City Council, and the recordation thereof authorized. MOTION CARRIED. l PROPOSED ROUTE 39 FREEWAY: Communication from the California Highway Commission, dated April 25, 1968, was submitted, requesting expression concerning their recommendation for possible location of Route 39 Freeway, between Route 1 Free- way and Lampson Avenue, in Orange County. Also submitted and reviewed was map illustrating the three proposed routings, 68-237 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Clark moved that the California Hilhway Commission be advised that the City of Anaheim offers no objection to the adoption of any proposed route south, of Lampson Avenue. Councilman Krein Seconded the motion. MOTION CAtffiIED. n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-241: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-24l for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE, FROM TIME TO TIME, OF SHORT TERM SECURITIES PERMITTED BY LAW, OR THE DEPOSIT IN INTEREST BEARING ACCOUNTS IN BANKS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF IDLE CITY FUNDS; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 6179. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-24l duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-242: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-242 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT GRANTING TO UNIQUE STATIONS, INC., A LICENSE TO ENCROACH UPON AN EASEMENT OF THE CITY. n Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: "None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-242 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-243: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-243 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO DEMAND PRESENTATION OF A CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 5250, ET SEQ., 'OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. - Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None n The Mayor 'declared Resolution Na. 68R-243 duly pas~ed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-244: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-244 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY" RECORDS. (City Engineer.) 68-238 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-244 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by ~ouncilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. City of Newport Beach Resolution No. 6758 - expressing its support for Senate Bill 425 concerning preemption. b. Public Utilities Commission Case No. 5495 - Resolution enlarging allocation from Crossing Protection Fund for protection at crossing of Orange- thorpe Avenue over track of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Crossing No. 2B-4l.8. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2512: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2512 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-61 - R-A. Fire Station No.7 Annexation.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2512 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2513: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2513 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-24 (5) - M-1.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2513 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2515: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2515 for first reading: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-59 - C-O.) ORDINANCE NO. 2516: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2516 for first reading: AN ORDINANCE OF' THE CITY: OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 'OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-26 - R-l.) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by Byron Lee and Donna Irene Layton, for Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License for Mimi's, 314$~ West Lincoln Avenue, (C-1 Zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 402.) b. Application submitted by Northridge Industries, Inc., for Person- to-Person and Premises-to-Premises Transfer of On-Sale General License, for Hyatt Coffee Shoppe, 1626 West Kate11a Avenue, (C-1 zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 1021.) l l 11 .J n n n 68-239 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL "MINUTES - May 7. 1968..1:.30 P.M. c. Application submitted by Winfred Orville and Lillian Imojean Reid, for Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, for The Gold Room,,508;South Knott Avenue, (C-l zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 776.) d. Application submitted by Emerson Henry and Natalie Flora Tiffany, for Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, for The Golden Key, 2625 West Lincoln Avenue, (C-2 zone.) No Council action ~as taken on the foregoing applications. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-245: Pursuant to action taken by the City Council on April l6, 1968, approving increase of architectural fees for additional work on the Police Building additions, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-245 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SER- VICES ENTERED INTO ON DECEMBER 26,l967, BETWEEN THE CITY AND MANUEL P. MENDEZ . Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-245 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-246: On report and recommendations of the City Attorney, Counci~man Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-246 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE UTILITIES DIRECTOR TO SELL WATER SERVICE LOCATED AT 10722-32 KATELLA AVENUE TO THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The MaY9r declared Resolution No. 68R-246 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST - WESTERN MISSIONARY ARMY: Mr. Davis reported, for Council information, on request for solicitation permit received from Western Missionary Army, to support activities of their organization, advising that the amount of funds used in the applicant's actual solicitation process will be more than the limit of 10%, as provided by the Anaheim Municipal Code) .that to deny their request would Dot prohibit the organization from proceeding with their missionary or religious work. The City Manager was authorized to reply accordingly, and no further action was taken by the City Council. REQUEST - SYNANON FOUNDATION: For the information of the City Council, Mr. Davis reported on request received from the Synanon Foundation, of Santa Monica, ~ot ~olicitation permft, and permission'to conduct a lottery. He advised that the lottery could not be granted in any case, and Council Policy No. ll6 provides for administrative granting for requests by local charitable organizations only, to conduct fund-raising events. The City Manager was authorized to reply accordingly, and no further action was taken by the City Council. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIID. AD~: 4:50 P.M. SIGNEl).~L )(. ~~~Jr~ . City Clerk