The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2004/08/09i i Monday, August 9, 2004 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California ® Chairperson: Gail Eastman ® Chairperson Pro-Tempore: David Romero ® Commissioners: James Vanderbilt-Linares, Jerry O'Connell, Kelly Buffa, Cecilia Flores, Pat Velasquez ® Call To Order Planning Commission Morning Session 11:00 A.M. • Staff update to Commission on various City developments and issues (As requested by Planning Commission) Preliminary Plan Review for items on the August 9, 2004 agenda ® Recess To Afternoon Public Hearing Session ® Reconvene To Public Hearing 1:30 P.M. For record keeping purposes if you wish to make a-statement regarding any item on the agenda please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. ® Pledge Of Allegiance . Public Comments ® Consent Calendar . Public Hearing Items ® Adjournment You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission(a~anahem net H:\docs\clerical\agendas\080904.doc 08/09/04 Page 1 Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 1:30 P.M. Items Of Public Interest: Oath of Affirmation of Allegiance: New Planning Commissioner -Pat Velasquez. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. Consent Calendar: The Report and Recommendation items 1-A through 1-D on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar far separate action. Reports and Recommendations 1A.(a) CEQA Negative Declaration (b) Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04661 (Tracking No.CUP2004-04870) Agent: Dwyer Beesley. P.O. Box 17783, Anaheim, CA 92817 Location: 115 N. Gilbert Street. Requests a retroactive extension of time (approved April 29, 2003; expired April 29, 2004) to comply with conditions of approval for a previously approved 9-unit "affordable" senior citizen's apartment complex with waivers of minimum landscaped setback abutting an arterial highway and minimum building setback.. 1 B. (a) Location: 1725 South Douglass Road. Request to determine conformance with the Anaheim General Plan for the proposed lease of additional office space to be used by staff from the County of Orange Environmental Resources Division. 1C. Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning Commission Meetings of July 26, 2004. (Motion) Project Planner: Della Herrick (d h errick(o) anah ei m: n et 1 sr$747dh.doc Q. 5. 26 Project Planner: Marie Newland (mnewland onanaheim.net) sr8761 mn.doc Q. S. 127 08/09104 Page 2 Public Hearina Items: 2a. CEQA Categorical Exemption -Class 1 2b. Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04868 Owner: Brookhurst Group, LLC, 1026 South Wall Street, #200, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Agent: Ahmad Alzuq, Family Market, 319 South Main Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Location: 802-808 South Brookhurst Street. Property is approximately 1.8 acres, located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Brockmore Avenue. Request to establish land use conformity with current zoning code land use requirements for an existing non-conforming commercial retail center and to permit a convenience market. Continued from the July 26, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting. Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. Project Planner: Della Herrick (dherrick(o)anaheim.nel) sr8742dh.doc Q.S.41 08/09/04 Page 3 3a. CEQA Negative Declaration 3b. Reclassification No. 2004-00124 Owner: Raymond Siegele, P.O. Box 3284, Anaheim, CA 92803 Voit Anaheim Business, 21530 Oxnard Street, Unit 6, Woodland Hills, CA 91367-4942 Charles Atwood, 23772 Avenue 208, Lindsay, CA 93247 CP/HERS Anaheim LP, 600 Citadel Drive, Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90040 Kenneth Thompson, P.O. Box 5406, Orange, CA 92863 Tomas Rodriguez, P.O. Box 8521, Anaheim, CA 92812 Location: Portion A: 516 East Santa Ana Street and 501 - 547 South Atchison Street: Portion B: 500 - 558 South Atchison Street• Portion C: 610 South Olive Street and 711 East South Street: and Portion D: 525 East South Street Portion A: This 10.7-acre area is located at the southeast corner of Santa Ana Street and Olive Street with frontages of 970 feet on the south side of Santa Ana Street and 480 feet on the east side of Olive Street (516 East Santa Ana Street and 501 - 547 South Atchison Street - Kwikset site). Portion B: This 10.3-acre area has frontages of 150 feet on the south side of Santa Ana Street and 340 feet on the east side of Olive Street and a maximum depth of 1,120 feet (500 - 558 South Atchison Street). Portion G This 10.3-acre area has frontages of 15p feet on the north side of South Street and 340 feet on the east side of Olive Street and a maximum depth of 1,120 feet (610 South Olive Street and 711 East South Street). Portion D: This 9:8-acre area is located at the northeast corner of South Street and Olive Street with frontages of 440 feet on the east side of Olive Street and 970 feet on the north side of South Street (525 East South Street). City-initiated (Community Development Department) request for approval of a reclassification of these properties as follows: Portion A-from ML (Limited Industrial) to RM-3 (Residential, Multiple- Family-2400) zone or less intense zone. Portion B -from ML (Limited Industrial) to RM-4 (Residential, Multiple- Family-1200) zone or less intense zone. Portion C -from ML (Limited Industrial) to RM-4 (Residential, Multiple- Family-1200) zone or less intense zone. Portion D -from ML (Limited Industrial) to RM-3 (Residential, Multiple- Family-2400) zone or less intense zone. Continued from the June 14, 2004, Planning Commission Meeting. Reclassification Resolution No. bequest for ;ontinuance to JVednesday, September 8, 2004 Project Planner: David See (dsee(a~anaheimnet) sr2151ds.doc 08/09/04 Page 4 9 abed b0/60/80 (•ure 00 6) b0-90-80 :Pas!naa '(auoZ ~(e!JanO 3S ay; panoJdde yo!yM'bl-OOOZ~d 'oN uo!}n!osaa 6wpupsaJ fiu!pnloup auoZ ~(e~Janp (ash pax!W al6ueu1 wnu!leld) flWld ay; y3!n~ auoZ ~(e~Janp (;uawu!e;Ja;ud s;JOdg) ~g ay; aoe!daJ o; apo~ 6u!uoZ ay; puawy ~MO!aq pa;s!I suo!;oe ay; Jo; uo!;e;uawnoop (e}uawuoJ!nua ay; se anJas o} a;enbape 6ulaq se (weJ6oJd a}epd~ 6u!uoZ pue"' ue~d IeJaua~ ay} y;!M pa;eioosse) OEE 'oN 2113 Pa!;!;Jai llsno!na~d au!wJa;a4 a{6ueul wnu!}e!d ayl Jo; uo!s!n s,ueld IeJaua~ ay};uawa!dwi o} suo(;oe 6u!N,opo; ay} 6u!pJe6aJ '1!ouno~ ~(a!3 0} uo!}epuawwooaJ e anew pue Jap!suoo o} uo(ss!wwo~ 6u!uue~d Jo} }sanbaJ pa}e!}!u! ~(}!~ „eaJy wn!pe}g w!ayeuy„ ay} se unnou>I os~e pue ~y~ou ay} uo ~(enn-;o-;y6u ~(uedwo~ uos!p3 e(wo}peg way3nog ay} pue ;sang ay; uo (g a;eisJaau~) ~(ennaaJd euy e}ueg ay} 'y}nos ay} uo s;!wll !;!~ w!ayeuy ay} ';sea ay; uo Jan!a euy e;ueg ay; ~(q papunoq /~~eJaua6 saJOe OZB.(la;ew!xoJdde 6u!ssedwooua sa!uadad uie;Jao asoyi 'al ue!Jl wnul;eld ayl :uol;eoo~ 50~ S PS oS qS eS'SON W311 dO M31n32i II~Nf10~.l1I~ 210d1S3f1O321 'y5 0£L00•b00Z pue 6Z600-b00Z 8ZL00-b00Z LZL00-b00Z'soN uo(~eo!~!sse!oaa •6g (59000-b00Z'oN ase~ snoaue0aos!w) ;uawaaJ y ~uaw o!anap pJepue;g a! uelul wnu!~e!d ayl ~o waod ayl ';g b8000-b00Z'oN ase~ snoauepaaslW ue!d ash pue ~a;seW a( ue!Jl wnu(;e!d ayl •ag (E8000-b00Z'oN ase~ snoaue0aos!W) ueid asn pue ~a;seW eaay wn!pe~g w!ayeuy ayl pu}osaa •pg Z8000-b00Z oN ase~ snoauepaos!W) auoZ ne!~anp auawu!e;ua~u3 s}JOOg ayl pu!osaa •og ZE000-b00Z 'oN auawpuawy apo~ uluoZ •qS OEE'oN 2113 Pa!;!;aa~- Isno!na~d •eg •oN uo(~n}osab;!woad ash leuo!;(puo~ bE 'S'D Oap'JI6~; 5JS (iau wiayeue zaJ!weJ , zaJlwea uyo~ uauueid }oafoJd s6u!}aaW uo!ss!wwo~ 6u!uue!d 'b00Z '9Z ~(Inp pue gZ aunp ay} woJ~ panu!;uo~ ~saoeds 6u!JIJed }o Jagwnu wnwiww;o ~an!enn y;ins Ja;uao I}e;aJ IeioJawwoo 6ufwJ0;uoo-uou 6u!}sixa ue Jo; s;uawannbaJ apoo 6u!uoz s,~t;!~ ay; y}!nn.(}iwJO;uoo asn pue{ yspge}sa o} pue'!ley 6upaaw snowluoue so!}oaeu e'sayanyo 6u!;s!xa one; u!e;aJ pue;!wJad o};sanbai{ •;aaJ3gluo!o~ pue anua Ja}sayo!o~ ;o Jawoo;seat'}nos ay;;e pa;eool'aJOe-L8'0 ~(la}ew!xadde s( ~(padad •anlua uaasayolo~ ~saM OEZZ ;uo!3eoo~ ZOB06 y~ 'yoeag 6uol '09b# 'PJena~nog ueaop ;sed l0E'dll'yl!wgpueopu(pe~'pJn3'pm~ydasop :;ua6y b00Z 'OZ ~agwa;dag o; aouenu!}uoo Jo}3sanbaa b9Z06 y~ 'yoeag esowJaH 'b0E xog •p d 'aa!66!211a suy~ o/o 'dly~ 'Ja;sa4olo~ asaM OEZ aaunnp L98b0-b00Z 'oN ~Iwuad asn leuo!;!puo0 rob ;uawaJ!n ab apo~;p ~an1eM •qb uol;eueloaa an!~e aN y1030 'eb • Replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) • Adopt The Platinum Triangle Standard Development Agreement as to form (to be customized on a project specific basis for all development within the PTMU Overlay Zone). • Reclassify properties with The Platinum Triangle designated by the General Plan as "Office High" to the 0-H (High Intensity Office) Zone (Resolution of Intent only -finalization required by property owners to develop under the O-H Zone) (Reclassification No. 2004-00127) • Reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle designated by the General Plan as "Office Low" to the O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone (Resolution of Intent only -finalization required by property owners to develop under 0-L Zone) (Reclassification No. 2004-00128) • Reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle designated as "Mixed-Use" by the General Plan to the PTMU (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (finalize zoning -property owners may develop utilizing the underlying zone or the PTMU Overlay Zone) • Reclassify properties finalized to SE (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone to the: • I (PTMU) (Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone (finalize zoning) -Rectangular-shaped 3.7-acre property having a frontage of 292 feet on the west side of State College Boulevard, having a maximum depth of 556 feet and located 335 feet north of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue (2045 South State College Boulevard). • I (SE) (Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone (finalize zoning) -Irregularly-shaped 24.5-acre property having a frontage of 1,120 feet on the east side of Douglass Road, a maximum depth of 1,130 feet and located 1,081 feet north of the centerline of Katella Avenue (146D South Douglass Road). • O-L (SE) (Office Low -Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone (finalize zoning) -Irregularly-shaped 7.25-acre property having a frontage of 1,560 feet on the west side of Douglass Road, having a maximum depth of 513 feet and located 690 feet north of the centerline of Katella Avenue (1501 - 1551 South Douglass Road). Zoning Code Amendment Resolution No. The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Resolution Rescind Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Resolution No. Rescind Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan Resolution No. Reclassification No. 2004.00127 Resolution Reclassification No 2004-00128 Resolution Reclassification No. 2004-00129 Resolution Reclassification No. 2004-00130 Resolution Project Planner: Susan Kim (skim(o)anaheim.net) sr8764sk.doc OS/09I04 Page 6 6a. CEQA Cateoorfcal Exemption -Class 1 6b. Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242 (Tracking No. CUP2004-04871) Owner: Lakeview Plaza Investment Company, 1667 East Lincoln Avenue, Orange, CA 92865 Agent: Investment Concepts, Bodycentre Orange, LLC, 1667 East Lincoln Avenue, Orange, CA 92865 Location: 430 North Lakeview Avenue. Property is approximately 3.1 acres, located north and east of the northeast corner of Lakeview Avenue and McKinnon Drive (Bodycentre). Request to expand an existing wellness spa and massage facility and to modify a condition of approval pertaining to a time limitation. Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 7a. CEQA Negative Declaration 7b. Waiver Of Code Requirement 7c. Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04857 Owner: John Lee, 3026 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 Agent: Chung Myung, 3380 Flair Drive, Suite 222, EI Monte, CA 91731 Location: 3026 West Ball Road. Property is approximately 0.41- acre, landlocked parcel located on the south side of Ball Road located 418 feet west of the centerline of Beach Boulevard. Request to permit a church within two existing residential structures with waivers of: (a) minimum setback for institutional uses abutting a residential zone boundary, and (b) minimum number of parking spaces. Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. Project Planner: John Ramirez (ioramirez(~anaheim.net) sr5108jr.doc Q.S. 167 Project Planner: Della Herrick (dherrick onanaheim.nel) sr8756dh.doc Q.S. 11 08109/04 Page 7 Sa. CEQA Negative Declaration 8b. Waiver of Code Requirement 8b. Conditional Use Permit No. 2871 (Tracking No. CUP2004-04872) Owner: Connelly S. Cornelia, 2323 West Broadway., Anaheim, CA 92804 Agent: Ron Sorenson, HGA Inc., 1613 Santa Clara Drive, Roseville, CA 95661 Location: 2323 West Broadwav. Property is approximately 6.5 acres, having a frontage of 454 feet on the north side of Broadway, located 860 feet east of the centerline of Gilbert Street (Cornelia Connelly High School). Request to construct a new gymnasium in conjunction with an existing private educational institution with waiver of maximum structural height adjacent to a residential zone boundary. Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 9a. CEQA Negative Declaration 9b. Reclassification No. 2004-00126 9c. Variance No. 2004-04619 9d. Tentative Parcel Mao No. 2004-137 (Tracking No. SUBTPM2004-137) Owner: Sarkis Balikji, 1429 West Crone Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802 Agent: Mamdouh Mina, 9849 East Flower Street, Suite D, Bellflower, CA 90706 Location: 1429 West Crone Avenue. Property is approximately 0.45-acre, having a frontage of 70 feet on the north side of Crone Avenue, located 38 feet east of the centerline of Hampstead Street. Reclassification No. 2004-00126 -Request reclassification of the subject property from the T (Transition) formerly RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) zone (formerly RS-7200). Variance No. 2004-04619 -Request waiver of minimum lot frontage on a public or private street for atwo-lot RS-2 single-family residential subdivision. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-137 -Request to establish atwo-lot, 2- unit detached RS-2 single-family subdivision. Reclassification Resolution No. Variance Resolution No. Request for continuance to August 23, 2004 Project Planner: John Ramirez (ioramirez(~anaheim.net) sr8756dh.doc Q.S. 33 Project Planner: Scott Koehm (skoehm(olanaheim.net) sr8763gk.doc Q.S. 64 08/09/04 Page 8 10a. CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration Request for 10b. Reclassification No. 2003-00109 continuance to 10b. Tentative Tract Map No. 16545 Wednesday, September 8, 2004 Owner: Red Curb Investments, P.O. Box 995, Torrance, CA 90508 Agent: Thomas Hartley, 29462 Thackery Drive, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Location: Property is approximately 53 acres, having a frontage of 190 feet at the terminus of Avenida de Santiago, located 260 feet west of the centerline of Pointe Premier (No address). Reclassification No. 2003-00109 -Request reclassification of the property from the T(SC) (Transition; Scenic Corridor Overlay) formerly the RS-A-43,000(SC) (Residential/Agricultural; Scenic Corridor Overlay) zone to the RH-2(SC) (Single-Family :Hillside Residential; Scenic Corridor project Planner: Overlay) and OS (SC) (Open Space; Scenic Corridor Overlay) zones. Amy Vazquez (avazouez(o~anaheim.net) Tentative Tract Map No. 16545 -Request to establish a 28-lot, 21-unit detached single-family subdivision. sr8762av.doc O.S. 286 Reclassification Resolution No. 11 a. CEQA Categorical Exemption -Class 11 1 tb. Variance No. 2004-04618 Owner: Ismos Investment Company, 11875 West Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90064 Agent: Martin Ross, 3845 East Coronado Street, Anaheim, CA 92807 Location: 3845 East Coronado Street. Property is approximately 6.3 acres, having a frontage of 385 feet on the north side of Coronado Street, located 509 feet east of the centerline of Jefferson Street. Project Planner: Elaine Yambao Request waiver of maximum size of freestanding sign. (eyambao@anaheim.net Variance Resolution No. sr3077ey.doc O.S. 154 Adjourn To Monday, August 23, 2004 At 11:00 A.M. For Preliminary Plan Review. 08/09/04 Page 9 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: q•.v~ U. „-- ~ S o (TIME) (ATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND / COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ~~-c(~-~ ~~ If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. RIGHTS OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits and Variances will be final 22 days after Planning Commission action and any action regarding Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said .appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department, (714) 765-5139. Notification no later than 10:00 a.m. on the Friday before the meeting will enable City staff to make reasonable accommodations. Recorded decision information is available 24 hours a day by calling the Planning Department's Automated Telephone System at 714-765-5139. 08109/04 Page 10 SCFiE®ULE 2004 August 23 September 8 (Wed) September 20 October 4 October 18 November 1 November 15 November 29 December 13 December 27 08/09/04 Page 11 ITEM N0. 1-A PR RCL 73-74-34 DAD MILLER GOLF COURSE T SAVANNA HIGH SCHOOL GG RCL 65-86-29 3616 RM-0 RCL 68-69-96 VAR 2091 APARTMENTS 52 DU RM-0 K i- r C-G RCL 85-e6-29 G CUP 3fi18 _ _~_ CUP 2951 VAR 3fi91 VAR 3554 ~~ -I F CUP O Dl 3390 C L1J m -~ R -a F- ij (n 1 ~ RM-3 LLI iCL 62-fi3-90 D] zDU J T `CUP 2954 APTS. m 20; .. -84-33 I z r C-G T z o z RCL 73-74-5 - -UARY o o ~ RCL 63-fi4-13fi ~ o a w CUP 2582 N ? S S B mow is . . MINI-MART RM-4 RCL fit-fit-92 VAR 1794 VAR 1744 CASA BONITA 71 Du RM-4 RCL 69-70-24 CASA BELINpA 91 DU C-G RCL 61-62-92 CUP 983 CUP 955 VAR 1794 VAR 1744 GRANADA INN MOTEL RESTAURANT 5 DU RM_q 5 DU -RCL 77-78-21- RCL 69-70-285 DU 5 DU (Res. of Inl, to CL) VAR 2971- m 4DU [)r 4DU ~O D Uy o __~_._ I I I I I RS-2- ?. _I I I I I 1.IU EAI/ LEVEL AVENUE ® ~- RS-2 a 1 DU EACH ® RS-2 Du EACH CHAIN AVE LINCOLN AVENUE N N O a O F x U N ~ W o: ~ ~_ °U aQ N w y 7 ¢o C-G RCL 77-78-23 T-CUP 2003-04730 CUP 4085 CUP 1999 ADJ 78 SHOPPING CENTER .---. ~"G ,..... Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04661 Subject Property TRACKING NO. CUP2004-04870 Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: DWYER BEESLEY Q.S. No. 26 REQUESTS RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME (APPROVED APRIL 29, 2003; EXPIRED APRIL 29, 2004) TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 9-UNIT "AFFORDABLE" SENIOR CITIZEN'S APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH WAIVERS OF: (A) MINIMUM LANDSCAPED SETBACK ABUTTING AN ARTERIAL HIGHWAY (B) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 115 North Gilbert Street G :L 77 1P 2Q CUP' {HOPI CEN- ~N U 1451 ITE*1 N0. ! -g I I ---.~~ ~~ / ~ I AFf OP ANA E M ND / KATELLA AVENUE I RCL 99-DO-15 (Res. of lnt. to SE) RCL 59-60-23 CUP 22fi9 CUP 1844 CUP 1707 VAR 4363 AYRES HOTEL O D Z m 'Tl mC D fn I.. . RCL 99A0-15 (Res, of Int. In SE) RCL fig-70-A3 (3) RCL fig-70-02 RCL 59{0-23 T-CUP 2003-04727 CUP 3703 v ARENA PLAZA 262 RCL 99-00-15 (Res. of Int. to SE) RCL 59-60-23 CUP 2003.04673 CUP 3716 GPC 2004-00036 .. (CUP 560) Q COMMERCE Q .. CENTER <' ~ Q~~ T RCL 99-00-75 (Res. of Int. to SE) RCL 97-98-14 M4INTENANCE DIVISION O.C.F.C.D. T PARKING O.OF.C.D- ~~ANO 'PF / SAryTq FERA (y,AY PR 99-00.15 (Res al Intent to SE) 73-7434 ~-@?-?? ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE (SE) (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT) OVERLAY ZONE General Plan Conformity No. 2004-00036 ~ Subject Property Date: August 9, 2004 Requested By: COUNTY OF ORANGE Scale: Graphic ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Q.S. No. 127 REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED LEASE OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE SPACE TO BE USED BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DIVISION. 1725 South Douglass Road, Suite D 1452 ATTACHMENT - R&R 1-B Bryan Speegle~ Director J ~,~ a 0~9~ 300 NSan~a Ina, CA ®(Jl o/ l l ®d' ®d6.11L'0'~Tti O G~ I'.O. Box 4048 ~' ~ RESOURCES & DEVELOPMENTMANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT Santa Ana, G~ 92702-4048 gLIFOR`~l~ Telephone: (7.14).834-?300 Fax: (714) 834-5188 Sheri Vander Dussen, Planning Director City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Ste. 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 July 16, 2004 SiiBJECT: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Dear Ms. Vander Dussen: V~' ~ 'S ~~~` ? n D~~''~+~Nl ~~ ~RTn~FNr `~~-. The County of Orange proposes to enter into a lease agreement for the use of 624 square feet of space at 1725 S. Douglass Road, Suite D, in Anaheim. The space will be used for offices for the Environmental Resources staff of the County's Resources and Development Management Department. Please review this proposal in accordance with Government Code Section 65402 to determine if the use conforms with the City's General Plan. To simplify processing, you may complete the bottom portion of this letter and return it to me. Thank you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter. Feel free to call me at (714) 834-5436 if you have any questions. Sincere GG~ Teri t~oger RDMD Real Estate Services Determination: Yes ^ No ^ This project is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim. City of BY: DATE: Comments: ITEM N0. ~ MU I tL ~~ O NIOBE AVE U CL m RCL fig-70-26 RCL 98.99.11 RCL 98-99-i 1 RCL 72-]3.33 RS-7200 T-CUP 2002-04511 CUP 326] 1 DU EACH T-CUP 2001-04344 CUP 3159 f CUP 2469 PARKf G LOT N MOTEL& RESTAURANT ~- CL Z RCL 96-99-11 RS-7200 ~ ~ RCL 57-5835 1 DU EACH p 1 O CUP 32fi7 VAR 646 CUP 3159 U ~ pdEDICAL OFFICES CRONE AVE STONYBROOK DR I Q p CL f ll RCL 98-99-11 RS-7200 ~ W RCL 58-59.111 1 DU EACH ~ OFFICE BLDG ORANGE COUNTY LIMITS J O~~ ANAHEIM CITY LIMITS RCL 9B 99-n H ~ RCL 50-5934 U L1J v~ CL (BCC 200 RCL 57-SB-2fi U ~ VAR 1918 ENTS ~ CUP 3145 m ~ = RCL 68-68436 ((CUP 4P3fi) SHDPS & Y RCL 62-63-173 VAR 1918 CI COCKTAIL LOUNGE ~ O RCL 54.55-7 (VAR 1918) COLCHESTER DR ~ ~ CUP 2004-048fiB (VAR 1138 CL ~ o m CUP 2317 (VAR 967 S) RCL 98-99-11 U) ~ CUP 2181 (VAR 1979) p U N RCL 5&59-34 Q' "~ CUP 1977 (VAR 796) p RCL S]-58-2fi ~ ~w 1- CUP 3342 9ALLHURST PLAZA ~ W w .-mN CUP 3Bfi6 = SHOPPING CENTER ~ Q ~ ~ CL ammmn GOODYE R Y j ~ RCL 9B-99-11 ~mmr'~~ CL y RCL 57-58-260~~~~~ RCL 98-99-11 O 2 CUP 2004-04861 oooop RCL SB-59-34 Q_' 210' O CUP 3649 rcK¢ RCL 57-58-26 m RM-2400 ~ CUP 1662 CUP 2961 K O SHOPS CUP 1354 0 BROOKMOREAVE RCL es-90-ss a APARTMENTS p RCL 67-68-86 CL ~ RCL 62-63-113 ~ RCL 54-55-7 VAR 1494 ~ -RCL 9899-11 TOWNHOMES Gm~ ¢ RCL 63-64-106 111 DU m~~QO U RCL 62-63-113 ~Om'o~am ~ BANK V n U> pn ~ U VAR 4246 00 m CL RCL 98.99-11 h c Pxafis] MINERVA AVf ~ suswnr ~ SANDWICH SHOP CL p cL CUP 3980 ~ RCL 9&99.11 RGL 50-55-] ' CUP 2003-04766 m RESTAURANT oCL 98 99-~ t CUP 1444.. ... v4rnur Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04868 Subject Property Date: July 26, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: BROOKHURST GROUP, LLC Q.S. No. 41 REQUEST TO ESTABLISH LAND USE CONFORMITY WITH CURRIENT ZONING CODE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING COMMERCIAL CENTER AND TO ESTABLISH A CONVENIENCE MARKET WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER. 802-808 South Brookhurst Street 141s ~ ~~ ~' s .~ x~ 5 .' ,.~ .~, ~ t, ,'~4 ~ ~' ~ rG z. ~~ - NIOBE~AVE ~ -~~- ~~ ( ~ ~ '"~ ~ ~ a ~a :~ ~~ ~. EN ~ ~ ~_,.~ ~ ~' ~ zI ~~ ~a~^, c'~"` 'n4`c ., v~ ~~ , L._ . - y-. i ~ "dui ~_ ~R~ -_= ~ t ~ , ~9 ~' ,w,. 3t ,r*-.F. ("' '~ ~ I ,~ ~~~ - 9 ,~„ ~ .,3o- } K~ 1 ~ ' ~' t ` e ~~ ~ Y ~~ ~; i ~~ ~ h j~F .k. ~. A aLY}. -. ~,. :.-..rr s / i ~ r . ,., .. _ __ ~ ~ _ CRONE AVE ---STONYBROOK DR f ~ _ ~ ~ t f ; .~.'~ c - ! f ~:~ ~!„ `~ I ~ ~' sz ~f. .3 f~~; .S ~ ~ ~ ~~i maker, ~ `~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ ~ rte' ; ' ~~ y V COLCHESTER` DR ~ ~ ~ ~`~ ~' ~ ~~p ~ - t~ p~ ~ ~:. ~ _ r ~ ~ ~_ ~ `.is ~ ~. .~. ~ :;= "`1 N"`' x., G a-4i "' a rya„ -~2in ~ :L,~?"t az~$ I r s y~ "~~m„, a Z ~ rs+ @Ei ak i s ro tie Y ' y ` ~"`°' 2 ~ ~~s~~n~~r$ '~ `'~ . ~' ~•~~~° *'~ O : x z D _ ~ ~.~~~r31 & ~ r ~' ~ ~ ~ `` E--~.. BROOKMORE AVE ~ ~ ~ ~ . gi n ¢v I s y ~ 1~ $ $ra r tm 4 r ~,..~ T ~ i ;= ~~~ `,u~,~ ~. w z 2 ~R~'~ v ;v'fi `} i v ~ ~ ~ v t ~ ~ ,e~~•y ~ -?~, ~'YC,u ~ "a ~ : k z u $~ R c r o r.. ~"~ ~ [ s~~w _ §1 ~ ~- ~ ` K m s t gvr s ,~ 7 2` ~` ~~~ ~ n,~~c.. d x ,y,~ ~ ~ `~` ~ t ~/ ~u x` =i~~``~~' ss'~i t~}} +t i i~ ~ .kL'~ r ~ ~ t ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ €~ ~ r~~.CHURCHILL' CIRr~ ~, E= r ~ d A J ' y 1i ~ a~ )dye 4 r s z; i '~, ~i ,--.^~ a2~ a ~ a ~ _ s ~S „, '~ f. x k t c , ~ ..ter ~" =.'.'i~1 x -e.. !r { L T '§ W ~ FAT ~ Lr^~ a '~ ~ s~ h N ~ e J CC r ~ P ~=.~I W x r ~, O#WELLINGTON CIR~ "'~1gVON CI > ,~ € .. - ~y ~r . a f ~ O ~ ~4 ~,RO , i ~ ~ xh . ~ ~ ~ ~ z- # e tl.. s v s " t. ~ ~ ~ . ~ si1 ._ai ~..' ~,. r. ?L' , Direction` General Plan Designation' North Corridor Residential East:: Residential' Low-Medium South, across Brookmore Avenue Corridor Residential West, across + Brookhurst Street Residential Medium Store Total Square :Code-Required ~ ' + Total Required Business Name Number Footage Parking Ratio Spaces er 1;000 s.f. Proposed Convenience Market 802/808 4 700 5.5' 25.8 ::(formerly AI Rayan , restaurant 'AI Sanabel Bake 816/820 2,050 5.5 11.2 Kassem EI-Katat (office) 824 1,028 4A 4.1 Video Rental :826 1,000 5.5 5.5 Ontime Printing 830 2,000 5.5 11 Star Dental ' 842 1,850 6 9.9 ' Islamic Fashion 8461850 1,650 5.5' 9.1 First Glass Hair Designs 858 2,475 5.5 13.6 Skywings Travel 866 825 5.5 4.5 Cleopatra Hair 868 935 5.5 5.1 West Pharmacy 870 1,575 5.5 8.6 Casa Mexicart (shown on 882 1,320 5.5 72 laris as Banana Juice>Bar Sizzler 888 4,727 8 37:8 Total 25,935 153 Staff Report to the r Planning Commissi~ FINDINGS: (23) Before the Planning Commission. grants any Conditional Use Permit, it must make a finding df fact that the evidence presenked shows hat all of the following conditions exist: (aj That the use as"modified is properly one for which a conditional usepermit is authorized by the Zoning Code, or is'an unlisted use as defined in Subsection 0030 (Unlisted Uses Permitted)`df Section`18.66.040((ApprovaifAuthority) (b) That the use as modified will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area+in which if is proposed to be located; (c) That the size and shape of the site for the modified use isadequate to allow the full development of he proposed use In a manner not detrimental to the particular'area or to the'health and safety; (tl) That the traffic generated by the modified use will not impose an undue burden;upon the streets and, highways designed and improved to carrythe traffidin the area] and (e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. RECOMMENDATION: {24) Staff recommends that unless additional or contrary information`is received during the meeting, antl based upon the evidence submitted to the Planning Commission, including the evidence presentetl in this staff report„and oral and written evidence presented at the public hearing that the' Commission take the following.: actions: 'Approve the petitioner's request including a time limitation for the market only of one (1) year from the commencement of the activity or August 9,:2006, whichever is less, by adopting the attached resolution, including the findings and conditions contained therein. Page 7 [DRAFT] RESOLUTION NO. PC20D4--* A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04868 BE GRANTED (802-808 SOUTH BROOKHURST STREET) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT NO. 5162, FILED IN BOOK 302, PAGES 24 TO 29 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTH 89° 58' 11" EAST 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 60.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF BROOKHURST STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF TRACT 5162; SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY .LINE NORTH 89° 58' 11" EAST 220.02 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT SOUTH 00° 40" 06" WEST 378.83 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 32.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF BROOKMORE AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT MAP; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 89° 19' 54" WEST 205.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF SAID CURVE BEING TANGENT W ITH FIRST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE; THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 00' 00", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG FIRST MENTIONED PARALLEL-LINE NORTH 00° 40' 06" EAST 361.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 26, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and that said public hearing was continued to August 9, 2004. WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and .after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section No. 18.08.030.0402. Cr\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- 2. That the existing commercial retail center and proposed convenience market as conditioned herein would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and developmept,of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. That the size and shape of the site for the commercial retail center and inafkefis adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health., safety, and general welfare since no waivers from Code development standards were necessary for this business. 4. That the traffic generated by the commercial retail center and market would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That'*' indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director's authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities), as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: Convenience Market: 1. That the convenience market is approved for a period of one (1) year from the commencement of the activity or August 9, 2006, whichever is less. 2. That, as stipulated by the petitioner, the hours of operation for the convenience market (including deliveries) shall be limited to 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., daily. 3. That no alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed on-the premises. 4. That no video, electronic or other amusement devices or games shall be permitted in conjunction with this convenience market. 5. That prior to the operation of this business, a valid business license shall be obtained from the City of Anaheim, Business License Division of the Finance Department. 6. That window signage shall not be permitted for the convenience market. All fixtures, displays, merchandise and other materials shall be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from all window areas. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. 7. That a separate trash enclcsure shall be provided for the market and shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum 1-gallon size clinging vines planted on maximum 3-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division approval. No trash storage areas shall be allowed in any required setback areas. -2- PC2004- That a plan sheet far solid waste storage, collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval. That an on-site trash truck turnaround shall be provided and maintained in conformance with Standard Engineering Plan No. 476. Said turnaround area shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. 10. That the business shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or audible). 11. That aBurglar/Robbery Alarm permit application, Form APD 515 shall be obtained from the Police Department. 12. That a Fire Emergency Listing Card; Form APD-281 shall be obtained from the Police Department. 13. That 4-foot high rooftop address numbers shall be displayed on the roof in a contrasting color to the roofing material and shall not be visible from adjacent streets. Said information hall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Police Department, Community Services Division approval. 14. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the C-G(BCC) zone, including the removal of the sign projecting from the subject unit adjacent to Brookhurst Street. 15. That as designated on Exhibit No. 1, parking space no. 1 shall be reserved for deliveries during regular business hours for loading and unloading in connection with the convenience market; that said area shall not be used for outdoor storage of goods or delivery vehicles. 16. That no trucks shall be parked or stored anywhere on the subject property for the purpose of advertising this commercial retail center or tenants. 17. That shopping carts shall be stored inside the building at all times and plans submitted for building permits shall indicate an area within the market dedicated to the storage of shopping carts. That a shopping cart retrieval plan shall be submitted to the Planning Services and Code Enforcement Divisions. The plan shall include provisions for the periodic retrieval of shopping carts from the parking lot and operational practices to prevent patrons from taking the shopping carts from the premises. 18. That no outdoor storage, display or sales of any merchandise or fixtures shall be permitted outside the building. 19. That for a period of one year from the commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, the Code Enforcement Division shall inspect the property on a quarterly basis to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval. Said inspections shall be paid for by the business owner. 20. That no truck larger than the actual parking space designated as the loading and unloading space shall be permitted and that delivery vehicles shall not encroach into the drive-aisle nor block the driveway. Commercial Retail Center 21. That trash storage areas shall be refurbished to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division to comply with approved plans on file with said Department. 22. That a landscape plan for the entire site shall be submitted to the Planning Department indicating type, size and location of existing and proposed refurbished landscaping and irrigation for review and approval by the Planning Department. Any decision by staff regarding said plan may be appealed to the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendation item. Once approved, the -3- PC2004- landscaping shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the plan. The landscape plan shall indicate the following: o That an on-site landscaping and irrigation system shall be provided/refurbished and maintained in compliance with City standards. a That the front landscaped setback area adjacent to Brookhurst Street shall be planted and irrigated with a minimum of nineteen (1 g) 24-inch box evergreen trees, groundcover and shrubs. o That the front landscaped setback area adjacent to Brookmore Avenue (adjacent to the parking lot) shall be planted with shrubs (minimum size of 5-gallon) to provide screening of the parking area from public view. The planter area adjacent to Building C shall be planted with two (2) additional 24-inch box trees. o That parking lot trees (minimum of six (6) 24-inch box trees for a total of ten (10) trees within the parking lot area) shall be planted within the existing parking lot landscape planters. 23. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by providing regular landscape maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty-four (24) hours from time of occurrence. 24. That all existing landscaping shall be maintained and immediately replaced in the event that it 'becomes diseased or dies. 25. That a plan sheet for solid waste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval. 26. That all air conditioning faciljties and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be properly screened from view and sound buffered from adjacent residential properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Planning Services Division approval. 27. That all publjc telephones shall be located inside the building only. 28. That no outdoor storage, display or sales of merchandjse or fixtures shall be permitted. 29. That roof-mounted balloons or other inflated devices shall not be permitted 30. That no video, electronic or other amusement devices or games shall be permitted anywhere on subject property. 31. That no vending machines shall be permitted on the property, which are visible from the public right- of-way. 32. That the number of tenant spaces shall be limited to thirteen (13) units as reflected on the site plan (Exhibit No. 1). 33. That all trash generated from this commercial retail center shall be properly contained in trash bins contained within approved trash enclosures. The number of bans shall be adequate and the trash pick-up shall be as frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of refuse from the property. The Code Enforcement Division of the Planning Department shall determine the need for additional pick-up. All casts for increasing the number of bins or frequency of pick-up shall be paid far the business owner. -4- PC2004- 34. That a valid business license shall be obtained from the City of Anaheim, Business License Division of the Finance Department for all businesses within the commercial center. 35. That all window signage exceeding 10% of the window area shall be removed. 36. That the parking lot shall be repaired, slurry sealed and restriped. 37. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1. 38. That the owner of subject property shall submit a letter requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 2181 (to permit on-sale alcoholic beverage sales in an existing restaurant at 808 South Brookhurst Street) to the Zoning Division. 39. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14 and 17, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18:03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 40. That within ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution, Condition Nos. 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 35, 35, 36, and 38 above-mentioned, shall be complied with. 41 That prior to final building and zoning inspections Condition Nos. 5, 10, 11, 12 and 37 above- mentioned, shall be complied with. 42. That approval of this applicatipn constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Cade and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution., and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS -5- PC2004- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY QF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -6- PC2004- Item No. 3 ~~iiW Pp F= Grp "east > LIA0.1]5 6i 4,0.1 Err rr m ~i PF ]5]a A A A VP~Ri16cH 1 rN \ vpF t50l ~ y p i m ~ F1wnEM \\1l i° ~ ; ~'J'1P +t W SP 9l0' IAL I ° 9a-0 VA0.1o]0 p 0.LlGPP]9f pll C INL FIP m P a m ML m p0 ~ VAP ]44t Q Po~(~n ~ m y G Z n ~ m o; zn 03 N Z.... o u. ~ o ML m l09<AO11° LUP \Bt4 ~ RL GPPJ9 VPLPNT a~o 9~p N acLZa°°]eetza PofL~~P B a 1 6 T0.1pi,F10.M ~6RTN pJE V'ia\9 ° \NpUO SI4F R ASO ~ (PBPN0.L 1 _. it nn~_-.v {_.. \ ~WPTE0.5t0.E ... ~y ~~ -.~ IAL ML 460 \ VPRypR 424M INO. P0. °; 14L INO FIP IAL pI1AME PREL\. Ml 446U V PRVPR]4 gUh01NG \NOUST0.wL RB' E4yN IPU RL1 V wiR+i~ 1 Ppi'K' 0. V P VI P I B ~]016/` ~ n ~ ~ ~ ", agp011° M0~ °P^ q ;. 0.GLGPP]9 FIµM0 ~ o SMPU'IN~ ° SWO ]0 L Rc~g9EP~N m ~ 1 V~ 0.S6W~5] ~ F\pU EALH „,~ ~.: ''; ~.' .... ~pLN ~' ~ N p 0 A100 9 ~ aM P M A~ l oM~2400» 'o $ Y Reclassification No. 2004-00124 Subject Property Date: June 14,2004 Scale: Graphic Requested By: ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Q.S. No. 84 / 94 CITY-INITIATED (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) REQUEST FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTIES FROM THE ML (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) ZONE TO THE RM-3 AND RM-4 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONES OR LESS INTENSE ZONES. 516 East Santa Ana Street., 500-554 South Atchison Street, and 525-711 East South Street '1371(2004-6-3) II Tf om Nn ~ sr2158ds RECOMMENDATION: (5) ; That the Planning Commission, by motion, continue Commission meeting, as recommended by staff. '! 07/27/2004 16:00 5626241178 V t'~I~ ~ SMITH L.L.P. lltrorneys July 27, 2004 John P. Itaniirez Planning Department City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: CUP Application Our Client; 2230 W. Colchester, a CA LP prot,rm~ Address 2230 W Colchester Dr Anaheim CA Dear Mr. Raalirez: Via Fax and U. S. Mail (714)765-5280 Our recent letter to Ms. Vander Dusan requested that the Commission hearing set for 7uly 26, 2004 be postponed until we have had a chance to work our the conditions with staff. As you know, we intended ow submission as a pre-filing request only to get staff input and to work out issues prior to hearing. Unfortunately, staff postponed the heating to August 9, a date on which the applicant will be out of the country, We ask that you check with our office before setting dates so these issues do not arise. The applicant wilt be out of the country from August 5 through Labor day weekend. Accordingly, the first time he will be available will be September. Please have the hearing reset for a September date after Labor Day, and please let me know the specific date before it is selected. In addition, two of the tenants did not get notice of the August 9 date. The tenants should be notified of the new September date as well. Vary truly yours, CURD, GALINDO & SMITH, L.L.P. Joseph D. Curd JDC:map cc: Client Sheen VanderDusen CGS PAGE 02 ATTACHMENT - ZTEM N0. 3 0 301 East Ocean Blvd. a Suite 460 a Long Beach o CA o 90802 a (562) 624-1 ] 77 o Faa (562) 624-1 i7@ ATTACHMENT -ITEM N0. 3 MEMORANDUM CITY OF ANAHEIM Community Development Department DATE: August 3, 2004 TO: David See FROM: Mark Asturias SUBJECT: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00124 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE The Community Development Department requests a 30 day continuance on Reclassification No. 2004-00124. The Department continues to discuss with affected property owners the future opportunity for residential development that would occur with the reclassification of their property. In addition, the Department continues to negotiate the acquistion of various properties that would be incorporated into the future Kwikset project site and anticipates that negotiations will be completed within 30 days. Should you have any questions please call me at extension 4315. FVDOCS~hDhI1M.AILA109MAM1W 607^ OOC ITEM N0. ~L T-CUP 2002-04511 ` OOP 326] 1 DL ~ T-CUP 2001-04344 4y+® pARI(P G LOT p N CUP 2469 MOTELS RESTAURANT a Z BROOKRURST COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR cL RCL 9a-99-t1 ~ ~ RCL 57-58-35 Q O I CUP 3267 U U I CUP 3159 I ,.MEDICAL OFFICES STONYBROOK DR I CL RCL 98-99-11 ~ RCL 50-59-111 ORANGE COUNTY LIMITS ~ OFFICE BLDG ANAHEI i CITYLIM/TS~ RCL 9B 99-11 ~ VAR 1918 RCL SB39-34 IL RCL 57-58-26 Ll.l C HOPS 8 a' CL COCKTAIL LOUNGE I- RCL 98-99-11 RCL 67-68-96 (- COLCHESTER DR 120 cL ~ RCL 62-63-113 ~ IL- RCL 9B-99-tt RCL 54-55-7 O RM- 200 y RCLSa-59-34 ~ CUP 2317 O r RCL 58-59-34 ~ RCUP 3342 6 ~ CUP 2181 ~ IIL RCL 57-58-26 W to CUP 3B6fi CUP 1977 O APARTMENTS W "-~ry~~ GOODVE R = BALLHURST PLAZA u ~- 'I mNmmQ. Y SHOPPING CENTER Q (nN / ~ Jmm1~N~ CL O }m 0~~~» RCL 98.99-11 p ~. ~20~ - p ' ¢~¢OV RCL 58-59-34 Q. W RCL 57-58-26 ~ APARTMENTS o cuP 2961 m ~ U ~ APARTMENTS CUP 1354 BROOKMORE AV O ~ ~ CL y VANCOUVER DRIVE cuP 16z9 co ~ ~ VAR 1494 RCL 99-99-11 2 I I t I CL mnm~ RCL 63-64-108 ~ I I j N l RCL 98.99-11 m° ^¢ a RCL 62-63-113 O I I ICI RCL 57-58-26 °me~¢m BANK ~ col RM-3DDD I~I CUP2 0 04-0 4 8 61 ~~°> m 101 RCL 78-79-45 Iml cUP 3649 rc~ ICI RCL 54-55-40 Ipl cUP 1662 ~ Iml CUP 982 ICI CUP 3456 RCL 9&9411 I{I CUP 1220 ~ml CUP22B4j RCL545s7 ~~I fiO D.U. CONDO Iz~ (cUP 15E3) SUBWAY I i l o l SHOPS SANDWICH SHOP I I I / I CUP 3960 RCL 5455-7 I _~__~/ t\~__~________/ t..... L CUP 2003-04768 RESTAURAM ®.~' CL BROOKHURST COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR RCL 99-99-it CUP 1444 CL CL RCL 54-55-7 VACAM VAR 2005 I CL I VAR 1211 S cL UP 2003-04768 RCL 98.99-11 BROOKHURST SHOPPING RCL 9e-99.11 'DST OFFICE CENTER ROL 54.55.7 RCL 54-55-40 T-CUP 2092-04314 CUP 2003-04768 T-VAR 2002-04815 CIIP 2007.04579 I.ARecc: Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04861 Subject Property Date: June 28, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: 2230 WEST COLCHESTER, A CALP Q.S. No. 34 REQUEST TO PERMIT AND RETAIN TWO EXISTING CHURCHES., A NARCOTICS ANONYMOUS MEETING HALL, AND TO ESTABLISH LAND USE CONFORMITY WITH THE CITY'S ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER WITH WAIVER OF MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. 2230 West Colchester Drive 1384(20046-22) 4a. 'CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4b. 'WAIVER'OFCODE`REQUIREMENT 4c, 'rCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT`NO. 2004-04861 .`SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: ((1) This irregularly-shaped 0.87-acre property is located at the so Drive and Colony Street;".having frontages of 120 feet on the:: and 321 feet on the east side of Colony Street (2230 West Cc REQUEST: (2) The petitioner'requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit. chinches, a narcotics anonymous meeting hall, and to establi City's zoning code requirements for an existing non-conformii waiver of the #ollowing: , SECTIONS 18.42.040 Minimum numbE :AND 18.08'.070 .:'(213 required; 6 (recommended B Manager) r BACKGROUND: (3) This property is developed with an existing commercial retail (Commercial,;.Limited - Brookhurst'Commercial Corridor Ove West Anaheim Commercial Corridors constituent sub-area of Project. The Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element Map' surrounding properties for Residential Medium land uses. (4) This item was continued from the June 28'and July 26, 21 meetings at the request of the petitioner due to a schedu recommended conditions of approval with staff. The pet attached letter dated July 27, 2004, requesting an additio property owner will be unable to attend this meeting. St be`continued to the September 20, 2004, Commission mE RECOMMENDATION: (5) That the Planning Commission, byinotion, continue this item Commission meeting, as recommended by staff. Sr5109jr 07/27/2004 16:00 5626241178 C lpJ lytd~l ~~y-~ GL'~LilV J.J® ~L ~~IZ'H~ L.L.P.. Attorneys July 27, 2004 John P. Ramirez Planning Department City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: CUP Application Our Client: 2230 W. Colchester, a CA LP pro Address• 2230 W Colchester Dr Anaheim, CA Dear Mr. Ramire2: is Fax and U. S. Mail (714)765-5280 Our recent letter to Ms. Vander Dusan requested that the Commission hearing set for 7uly 26, 2004 be postponed until we have had a chance to work our the conditions with staff. As you know, we intended ow submission as a pre-filing request only to get staff input and to work out issues prior to hearing. Unfortunately, staff postponed the hearing to August 9, a date on which the applicant will be out of the country. We ask that you check with our office before setting dates so these issues do not arise. The applicant will be out of the country from August 5 through Labor day weekend. Accordingly, the first time he will be available will be September. Please have the hearing reset for a September date after Labor Day, and please let me know We specific date before it is selected. In addition, two of the tenants did not get notice of the August 9 date. The tenants should be notified of the new September date as well. Vary truly yours, CURD, GALINDO ~ SMTTH, L.L.P. Joseph D. Curd JDC:map cc: Client Sherri VanderDusen ATTACHMENT -ITEM N0. 4 CGS PAGE 02 • 301 East Ocean Bivd. o Suite 460 a Long Beach m CA o 90802 0 (562) b24-L 177 o Fax (562) 624-L 178 master Cana use Tian, wmcn encompasses the entirety of The Platinum Tnangle;'thE Overlay Zone, which encompasses the 325 acres of The Platinum Triangle designate Use, and a standard Development Agreement, which would be requiredfor developrr ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ~~ A'f"TACFiMEN? /~ SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION FIGURES 1-6 Figure 1 i ® ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2004-00032 AMEND THE ZONING CODE TO REPLACE THE (SE) (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE (ORDINANCE NO. 5673 PERTAINING TO CHAPTER 20 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE) WITH THE (PTMU) (PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00085 APPROVE AS TO THE FORM OF THE STANDARD PLATINUM TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00082 RESCIND THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO THE (SE) (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE (RESOLUTION N0. PC2000-14). ~ece.e The Platinum Triangle b ee Hemp Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 7409a L i MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00083 RESCIND THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANAHEIM STADIUM AREA MASTER LAND USE PLAN (RESOLUTION NO. 99R-39). d^®®^^o MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00084 ^ q^^^a^C gppROVE THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN. Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 1409b i RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00127 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM THE I (INDUSTRIAL), C-G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL), 0-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) AND PR (PUBLIC RECREATION) ZONES TO THE 0-H (HIGH INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE. p..vaao The Platinum Triangle ~ea®eaC Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 1418a Figure 4 Figure 5 i RECLASSIFICATFON NO. 2004.00129 ,peoooo RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM: m The Platinum Triangle (A) I (INDUSTRIAL) ZONE TO I (PTMU) (INDUSTRIAL - 9oaeeae Date: Au ust 9, 2004 PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. 9 (B) 0-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE TO O-L (PTMU) Scale: Graphic (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. (C) PR (PUBLIC RECREATION) ZONE TO PR (PTMU) (PUBLIC RECREATION -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. (D) T (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TOT (PTMU) (TRANSITIONAL - PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. ® (E) C-G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE TO C-G (PTMU) (GENERAL COMMERCIAL -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. iaia Figure 6 i RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00130 RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM: (A) I (SE) (INDUSTRIAL -SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE TO I (PTMU) (INDUSTRIAL -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. (B) I (SE) (INDUSTRIAL -SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE TO 0-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE. (G) O-L (SE) (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE -SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE TO 0-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE. 8ea®oao m e The Platinum Triangle 9...a.. Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic iaio ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE p-T7'ACHIENT B GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ~4TTi4CHf~lENT C ALTERNATIVE FIGURES Alternative A Alternative A removes bike lanes on Market and Connector Streets. Alternative A ._--~• / _~- . ~.-- .~• ~ ., r ..~•' ? ! ~u_~-- _ r .~ ., .--' r' ~, -_ t r r ~ V ~ ~e ~\, rc+~m, x,~ . NL. 1 '.~ u f ;~ ee L c~~„y a '.\ ~ a r ,`~ r q • j_ "y~ 1/ X p V ~ R Legend ~ ~------- ~~...~ The Platinum 'triangle Lioundary Mixed-Use General Plan DeSignatinn . m m m m Conceptual Connector Streets 0 r'S0 1500 :',000 Conceptual Market Streets {Regmred Ground Floor Commercial) RequireU GruunU Floor Commercial ~ PoienU215i(rnal[: eU lnturSeGlion - ConGePluai Mlni Park l.ocahon Conceptual Neiq_hbodrooU Path 4ocalion ~yy,, ~t~, Gxir,I~ny AmtrakFMeirolm{; Station t.ocat~np Conceptual :.RTIC Slahon Lacntion `~ ~P' Lantlmarn Archdaclme ~ ~ Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan Alternative A Ultimate Pn)Itl of VJay Figure 32: Gonceptual Market Street Alternative A c R ck prep ~E. ~~ 1 I - fJ SIR V(Fr- f ~ I t ~! 1 ~>~ ~jt ~ , .,,~', ~~,, Poa uiaSUSC ~ artir f u+-ing Envonvhmert vefa:o "..iaVlr tUpuona~~ Vlidl~OvRrYJp i0n0l. Uhtmme it~gnt of Way kot 44~iO~ir ct pl cignObIDA tll'60CIiat1 pal Ming ~~n=mH~`CG Ctl fp 'ravel 1. nc Figure 33: Conceptual Connector Street Alternative B Alternative B removes bike lanes on Market and Connector Streets and requires parallel parking instead of diagonal parking along Market Street. Alternative B `'`. ~..' °-. . -. _ .o.. .--z.. ~. ~ .. ' ~ r" ' - ~ ~ ~ xmi u. n.c ~ ii :~ r.. ,• } - 'ry Oe Legend -~...o The Platinum Tnangln Houndary 0 Mixed-Use G¢neral Pian Designation .emna Conceptual Connector 5ireels Conceptual Marked Streets (Required Ground Floor Commercial! Regmretl Ground Floor Commercial Polentia15ignal¢P.d Intersection -?'~,° Conceptual Mrtu Fark Location ~Yy Conceptual Nelyhborhood Park Location 7 ExisGnn Amlrak/M¢Irphnk Station Locaton ~,~, Conceptual AFTIC Station Location ~ ~' LandmarF. Arcfiieclure .9 ~' ___~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~~ ~YYR~ l~ l ~` ~~~ / ~= ~fa~{T~~ ~j Z 0 750 i5t10 3000 Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan Alternative B Figure 32: Conceptual Market Street Ullnnale R19ht of `Nay Nnie Within SUU leel of Si9na{Ixetl inlnrSaclton. p9;vmp lane may convert 10 Travel lane Alternative B f ,. ~ , -ui~ ~~;~.., i i ~ ~ <.;,v <<n~. t 11 v9G(1 4uuD ~i n I n, •r :o par4vay d 1 iii.. v,,.c:Ap~ ~d14AOq F:rtk;p{i c~pnF m iPJF•ooo~i; i~,i bl>3 Uce i MnCh11161514%~ilYU C 'kti UVninY~ro+ei 5tG1 [LICY UIM1n1piC FI!ghl at atop Male +Nillun SUD It I ;I SRJ~~itlCeil ~ IIY/ (:1m`~ 1'rtuFi rt ~ nib=/ 6L."qrt in tr. vGl IanO Figure 33: Conceptual Connector Street Alternative C Alternative C removes bike lanes on Market and Connector Streets, requires parallel parking instead of diagonal parking along Market Street and removes a portion of a Connector Street that links Gene Autry Way to ©rangewood Avenue, south of the conceptual mini park location Alternative G , ..~• ~-• . _ . 4 ~.. .'~°, ., r.~.r'- f' ~ ! 3 a „- ' v tl a ~ x.,mro a.< \ h n u ;~ . n > ~•• c•~~e aa~rv s ~~ ~~ ~ i .4. V 4„ °d ~~ e4~o . Legend ®.•® The Platinum Triangle ©oundary MixeU-Use General Plan Destgnalion • m m m m Conceplual CommGOr Streets Conceptual Market Streets (Requited Ground Floor Commeruah Required Ground Floor Cornmeriol ® POtenlial Signahzetl Infe^sectinn Conceplual Mirti Park Looation Conceptual Neryhborhood :'ark Loratinn ,yV4~ Cam,,, Exislmg Flmt[ak/Melrolink Station Location Conceptual ARTIC Station Loraiiun ~ ~' Landmark Hrcl7ilecture _ ~- -,,..~- f ~::.- ai J ..,~„~~ who tmrtpeaootf->11 1 f = ~ r f) %50 1500 30bC1 Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan Alternative C Figure 32: Conceptual Market Street Mote WiBnn $Ofl feel nl ,~agnalretl mlefsen¢m pafiny Iane nIDy convNn ro I ,wel Iti ne Alternative C .i~ia•. m it :+_F nt ela (- I ti ii'Fti . °"v„ ~ ~~- 1 ~ G m ~^ ) JJ (/ F~i1~A~n :1l Miff i.JV~Y:i~~II~ i~)~Ii~iflJi.1 bi1Ci, )11L Vlil!n3;c Riphi cl Way PJCIe 'Mithin S00 Leel nl SlgtgllZCi1 nHCf6eGlioq Va~krnq lone OIT{ conantl b InMe~ :me Figure 33: Conceptual Connector Street ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ~-TTA-CHNIEIVT D THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE -KEY PROVISIONS The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone Key Provisions Purpose: To implement the Mixed Use General Plan land use designation and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Applicability: Applicable to properties within The Platinum Triangle designated for Mixed- Use by the General Plan. The'PTMU Overlay Zone would permit properties to continue to be operated, expanded and developed utilizing the underlying zone or be developed with residential, office andlor commercial uses under the PTMU Overlay Zone standards and provisions. Uses: Residential Uses allowed as primary permitted uses. > Ground Floor Commercial Uses are required along Market Street and along Gene Autry Way, east of Market Street, and are permitted in all other Ipcations. . Ground Floor Commercial Uses include both retail and non-retail uses. Development The maximum intensity is based on planning and infrastructure considerations Districts: analyzed in EIR No. 330 (General Plan and Zoning Code Update) such as traffic capacity, access and availability of infrastructure and proximity to destination areas. Maximum Maximum Office Maximum Commercial pistrict Dwelling Units Square Footage Square Footage Arena 425 100,000 100,000 Gateway 1,750 530,000 50,000 Gene Autry 1,000 100,000 50,000 Katella 4,250 775,000 544,300 Stadium 1,750 1,760,000 1,300;000 Total 9,175 3,265,000 2,044,300 Structural . Structural height requirements along Gene Autry Way are intended to Height: preserve view corridors to Angel Stadium of Anaheim. • Greater heights are permitted by Conditional Use Permit. Maximum Height Location in Feet Within 300 feet north or south side of Gene Autry Way 55 Right-of-Way Between 300 and 600 feet north or south of the Gene 75 Autry Way Right-of-Way Arena and Stadium Districts Unlimited All other properties 100 Coverage: . Maximum Site Coverage is 75% THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE HIGHLIGHTS (continued) Project Size: • Minimum Project Size is 50 dwelling units. • Residential projects of more than 400 units on parcels .larger than 5 acres will consist of more than one building type (i.e., tuck-under buildings with the garage under the living unit, buildings that surround or wrap around a freestanding parking garage., podium buildings located above a subterranean parking structure or tower buildings over 5 stories in height) Minimum Unit Type Minimum Floor Area Floor Area: Studio 550 square feet, provided, however, that the number of studio units shall not exceed 20% of the total number of units per residential building One-bedroom 650 square feet Two-bedroom 825 square feet Three-bedroom 1,000 square feet More than three 1,000 square feet plus 200 square feet for each bedroom bedrooms over three Structural Setbacks may be modified subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Setbacks: Setback Requirement Public Right-of- 10 feet along Market Street, Connector Streets, Way, Private Wright Circle, Private Streets, Alleys and Railroad Streets and Alleys ROW • 12 to 18 feet along Arterial Highways • Outdoor restaurant dining areas, residential patios and building features may encroach into the setback area Abutting Interior • 5 feet-fully landscaped Property Lines No encroachments Between Buildings • 20 feet - 40% of the setback area is required to be landscaped > Limited encroachments (i.e., balconies, private patios, building entrances, plazas, recreational facilities, walkways, benches and driveways) Structural . All buildings adjacent to a public street will maintain a continuous 'street wall' Location and formed by the edge of the building for a minimum of 70% of the IoUparcel Building frontage adjacent to the street. Orientation: • parking lots and structures will be located internal to the block in a location screened from view of the public right-of-way or subterranean to the building. Public Parks: . Parcels 8 acres or larger are required to provide a public park at a rate of 44 square feet per unit. Parkland dedication will be credited against park-in-lieu fees. Developers of arcels smaller than 8 acres will pay park-in-lieu fees. Recreational 200 square feet of recreational-leisure area per dwelling unit will be provided -Leisure in private or common areas. Balconies and patios must comply with minimum Area: size requirements to be considered as part of the recreational-leisure area requirement. THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE HIGHLIGHTS (continued) Parking: e A parking demand study must be submitted far any mixed-use development. On-street parking, tandem parking and valet parking may be allowed to satisfy parking standards if approved as part of the parking study for certain uses and building types. Vehicle . Parcels located adjacent to the Connector Streets will have their primary Access: access off of these streets. The minimum distance between driveways on arterials is 350 feet. Streets: An access and alignment study will determine the exact location of Market Street and the Connector Streets based on their conceptual location in the Master Land Use Plan. o A traffic study will determine if additional Connector Streets will be required based on projected traffic volumes. Loading and a Residential uses are required to have one off-street loading space or moving Moving plaza for every 150 units. Plazas: Refuse Buildings with both commercial and residential uses must have separate Storage and refuse storage areas. Recycling Facilities: Design o Requirements include: Standards: Architectural Massing Fagade Enhancement Landmark Architecture Architectural Detail Roof Treatment Parking Structure Design Pedestrian Circulation Screening of Service Areas Signs: o Coordinated sign program is required Compatibility: . Mixed-use projects must demonstrate compatibility both internally and with adjacent properties. ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACHMENT E CORRECTIONS AND OMISSIONS The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan .............................................................................................................................................................................................. A previous planning study, Anaheim Stadium Area 1lYlaster Land Use Plan, provided a plan for office, sports, entertainment and retail uses around a sports entertainment destination know as Sportstown. The Platinum Triangle Master Land Usc Plan replaces and supersedes the Anaheirri Stadium Area ivtaster Land Usz Plan. continue to be able to develop using their underlying zones, which vary from I (Industrial), 0-L (Low Intensity Office), PR (Public Recreational), T (Transitional) to CG (General Commercial). The underlying zones for properties within the area ` designated for Mixed-Use by the Genera( Plan are shown on Figures b-10. I'lte PTMU Overlay Zone replaces and supersedes the (SE) (Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone, which was the implementing zone for the A~aaheim Stadium Aran Master Land Use Plan. However, unlike the (SE) Overlay "Lone, the PTMU Overlay Zone does not apply to all of the propertizs within The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The PTMU Overlay Zone only applies to properties designated by the General Plan for Mixed-Use. In addition, to utilizing the PTMU Overlay Zone, these properties will Properties within The Platinum Triangle that are not designated for Mixed-Use by the General Plan are designated for Office High, Office Low. Open Space, Industrial and Institutional uses. The respective implementing zones are O-H (High Intensity Office)_e O-L (Low htteasity Office),; I (Industrial}„ OS (Open Space); and, ~'~ -- ,". ~ . ,. , ,',^ ~.,~; ittrriE~e~tfse-[?~ (-pt;kil4;. '~a`~ '~=.~+}srtionrl}tt~ SP (Semi- public). August S, 2004 8 Fogaa¢•e 2: AePial Pho~a~ The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ~lfface Flzg9a gaar~ efface 3,ou~ Located along the freeways and the periphery of The Platinum Triangle, the high and low density office areas will be implemented through the O-F-T (Office High) and O-L (Office Low) Zones and will provide new workplace opportunities within easy access to a Variety of housing, retaih entertainment and sports facilities within the Mired-Use areas. The maximmn amount of allowable office squaze footage in these office hieh and low designations is 1,735,000 square feet. IaaaPaastreBl At the northern periphery of The Platinum Triangle there are industrial uses, which will continue to provide needed jobs for the area. Industrial uses may have a PAR ranging from 035 to 0.50. The implementing zone for these uses is the 1 (Industrial} Zone. ~peaa Sprees The Open Space designation includes those areas intended to remain in natural open space including utility easements that will provide recreatioriaf and trail access to Anaheim's residents. 1'he implementing zone is the OS (Open Space) Zone. Iaasa'iPaati®aarel The Institutional designation covers a wide variety of public and quasi-public land uses and is applied to existing public facilities. Institutional uses may have a FAR of 3.0. The implementing zones-ate-W~ il-'u~Ft~R;~tm'~-.,~;=~s;t;r~rt-is the SP (Semi-Public) Zones. ,, --." _-- I --,.-~" ~.. ~. ,~ ,` ,. t.;- -. ~ r . .5 T ~ ~ :o ~~ ~/ -~' i~ I~ - _ ~Nav/eIIP e ~ i ' ~ ,~ i- \` ~ .~' _ a l; ~ , I . ~ i ~ - ~~ , O 2'a F ~ ~ ~ t ~ u , ° ,v -`~" ~ t; A ~ ~ ~~4 ~'sn~ ' i t x i' 1 ~' y~'V~e.l ~~ `~~ \ti .< ~n4 ~ ~ t ~ ey 1 `,. >>~~ ,. P h G ` ? \ ~ ~ i' ~ \\~ i 7' ~ -_ c ~sAu~+y 4"+v~ ~~~; ~ ~ ~ ,. ~` Q 9 WOOO AV OYC \ l ~ .• Legend L. '~ y 1 ,_~`, ~r °_~~~ Alixed-Use ~,~ ~' x is O%ice-Lrnv , ;. Ofime-High 1. .. ..-... :~.. Industrial Instttutianel Open Space ^~- kaihoad ,~~ ~igaare 3: ~e~eraB Pura ®esign~~i®ras P.ugust 9, 2GOA 10 .................................................................................................. .................................................................................................. Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan __ , o~_ n ~. v~p ®.e® h. ~ ~ +. *~.. ~- ~~ ~ ~ Wi. - i ~"~•4, tM 4 ~, ~~ , H' 8 ~ F Kaleila Ave ~ ~. li II ~ h.yry1. +~ y ~" ~ Jrq ~y[p, I \\ 4'Y~i,~f" ~ 'Qhr~~~~M ® I ~~ ,~ I„ >vv_ r" /' µ. II I'_ -°r~ ~`~~ _ Gane AGtry ~, - en , ~ ~.\ =- . Eli a ~ Uar D~~H.. D: Ere \ 9r i~` _.._ `, qua e i t n 3 ~ j ~~~ I ~~It ~ ~~ s J Legend ~~. ..~._®. ,, ®ao® The Platinum Triangle Boundary `! _/~~ 0 Mixed-Use General Plan Designation <"~ ® s~ m ®© Conceptual Connector Streets 0 750 1500 3006 ^'-~ `Conceptual Markei Streets = - (Required Ground Floor Commercial) ~~~-~°` Required Ground Floor Commercial -••-- Proposed Bike Lane ~ Potential Signalized Intersection Conceptual Mini Park Location Conceptual Neighborhood Parlc Location Existing Amtrak/Metrolink Station Location >~ Conceptual ARTIC Station Location ~ ~ Landmark Architecture `~ ~.' ~igt~re 4: "i•he 9~Ia~inLtr~a ~riangie IJrbar~ ~esigra dart June 28, 2004 19 Platinum Triangle Master Land llse Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ,- ®" t ~~ a O . ®ysy4 ~ C ~ C ~Q ~^ 51 I tl u t Df a s, µ~ ~fl6: O • a e ~,„„~ ., S q i., rp § i °i n 5~0 a G~~f t' ~ fE"i.-go-», ti.-' ei a.-'m'.n a.--~~ vc 5. y.- '~ c ~i .~y'~~ 4~ ~6 ~ ~ ty ~E+ ~fisnq~~. } i W /1~~.. c #y. ~ii~f 'e ,~„ULC'~ Y:.e Q , z m b ,~ o°{~ ~eee n ~ y rv4 Y ~ ~ fy &A~ 71 d ~ \ Cam. ~y C@O '~o~,~a~_F?d~~L"~i tit'io Gca?at7~ O $ ss Or 9ewootl Avenue • v $;-* '^ -ale =.d f - - ~, ~. ..0 75D 1500 300p Legend ®.er.~, The Platinum Triangle Boundary ~ Conceptual Mini Park Location ~~ Date Patm fi Mexican Fan Palm Conceptual Neighborhood Park Location Green canopy Tree Existing Amtrak/Metrolinl< Station Location i% Flowering Canopy Tree Citrus Tree Conceptual ARTIC Station Location e a o m a Conceptual Connector Streets 0 Mixed-Use Gen=_ral Plan Designation Conceptual Market Streets (Required Ground Ftoor Commercial] ~ Potential Signalized Intersection Pequired Ground Floor Commercial Fagaare ~i: Landscape ~once~st 9~Ean July 30, 2004 30 Draft ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................. Legend ~. ® Potential Signalized Intersection ®®®m Conceptual Connector Street Localion ma®a Conceptual Markel Street Location Mixed Use General Plan Designation ~g~g~~,, u .rou~ sim~ le~.r See Figure 37 for Secondary Streets (Floweli Avenue, Sunkist Street and Cerritos Avenue) Figaare 12: Cross Sectioro Key iVdap July 3D, 200-. 31 Draft .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Platinum Triangle fNaster Land Use Plan Ullimale Right cf 4Vay Figatre 32: ~r~~ezst~aal 11~as~ket Street July 30, 2004 58 Draft .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................................ PrivaL palms may encrpacn i' Inm setback area Metlium campy Tree La;i tlo-aerino Shrub ar grounrlcover m pafkc~ay anc lantlscape realm narking iOptionab Sel walx Biked ~Bilae back Lane Lane (ias requiretll 26'-48' las requVetll~ Ulitmale Rlght o(Way ~igtare 33: s~rsca~staaal connect®r Street duly 30, 200? 60 Draft ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Anaheim Zoning Code 15.20.050 STILUC'1'bJ L HEI<O)13TS. Platinum TrianUle iVtixed Use Overlay Zone The height requirements for the PT_MIT Overlay Zone are shown in Table 20-1; (Maximum Structural Height: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) and apply in addition to the Structural 1-Ieight Limitations in Chapter 13.40 (General Development Standards). Greater heights are permitted in connection with a conditional use permit as set forth in Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permit) nroviiicd iL-tit plans submitieci in samection with ~~ condiii+nlal ust ir.:nnit ibr hirzher heiafhts Yvithin 600 fivet north of ,alith o{'Gene!-turn ~~';n=sh.}11 ile^U?n5ti ..lC ?hift \'IC~4 i; Ot i1~L:Cl ~?al llliTl Ol iLiial7C tn1 ll Ollt the j.Il Etliell}7 L~OnVi;nllQn t. clllc'r LrLlt )1'0!17 ~Jt-1!.: ;1: U.li't ~~5 ,i t i,nd UlC ~'~Llllt it !Li 1121 (i-.'1 l 1 ~~,{~}±~~ , ~t!O]:.1n~T t~".`,SL ?G~l41rt,~;; l~li'; ~ttidllll171 arfi ilOl tiii~71111c18.nt1`.YObll'llCG9d. Table 20-E ?~l.9XIMUMSTRUC'TU1tf9L HEIGkiT: TLfE PLATINUh7 TItLt1NGLE ML°CEd3 USE (PTA4U) U6'EftL,2YZONE 11'tazinaum Height in )r eet Within 300 feet north or south side of 55 Gene Autry Way Right-of--Way Beriveen 300 and 600 feet north or south 75 of the Gene Autry Way Right-of--Way Arena and Stadium Districts Unlimited All other properties 100 &5.20.060 C®VEIlgAGE. .OiO Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage for the PTMU Overlay Zone is seventy-five percent (75%). .0101 Coverage is the sum of the area of all building footprint areas and the area of exposed parking divided by the gross area of the parcel excluding Market Street or Connector Streets and/or any required public right-of--way. For purpose of coverage calculations, parking is not considered exposed when landscape, patios and pool decks are located on the top level of a parking structure. .0102 Accessory Buildings and Structures. AII accessory buildings and structures, shall be included in the maximum site coverage calculation. 18.20.070 PRO~C'I' SIZE. The residential project size requirements are as follows: .010 The minimum residential project size shall be fifty (50) dwelling units. .020 Residential projects of more than four hundred (400) dwelling units on parcels of five (~) acres or greater shall consist of more than one (1) building type, as defined in Table 20-F (Building Types: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone). .030 Building Site Requirements in Chapter 1II.40 (General Development Standards) shall also apply. DRAFT 20-5 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Codc Platinum Triangle ivtixed Use Overlay Zone .0101 Number of Spaces for Residential Uses. The following minimum parking requirements shall be used in determining parking need: T able 20-I ~ NIPNIIVHUM PARICINO REQUIREMENTS: TIIE I'LATINUILI TIRANGLE MIXED IJSE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE "i'•otal Nnmher of Bedrooms Mfinimnm Number o6Parl;ing Spaces Per Unit 1 bedroom 1.5 spaces 2 bedroom i 2.Q spaces 3 bedroom 2.5 spaces 4 bedroom 3.5 spaces .0102 Number of Spaces for Non-Residential Uses. The number of parking spaces for non-residential uses shall be detern~ined by the type of use (use class) specified in Table 42-A (Non-Residential Parking Requirements) of Chapter 42 (Parking and Loading}. .0102 On-Street Parking. Parking located on a private or public street directly in front of a use may be considered for parking credit as part of the parking demand study. .0103 Tandem Parking. Tandem Parking maybe permitted in conjunction with subterranean parking and tuck-wider buildings, where both spaces aze assi;ned to the same designated dwelling unit. .0104 Valet Parking. Valet parking may be permitted in conjunction with subterranean parking, provided valet services are provided for and managed by an on-site management company or homeowner's association. .020 Designation of Parking for Residential and Non-Residential Uses. Parking spaces specifically designated for non-residential and residential uses shall be marked by the use of posting, pavement markings, and/or physical sepazation. Parking design shall incorporate separate entrances and exits, or a designated lane. for residents, so that residents are not waiting in line behind non-residential drivers. .030 Vehicle Access. All vehicle access shall be designed and improved in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. .0301 Primary Vehicle Access. Parcels located adjacent to Connector Streets €rree-t `Sint*~shall have their primary vehicle access off of said streets. .0302 Minimum Distance Between Driveways of Arterials. The minimum distance between adjacent driveways on the same site or adjacent properties located along arterials shall be not less than three hwtdred and fifty (350) feet except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. .0303 Vehicular Access from Katella Avenue. When two or more parcels or lots located adjacent to 1Catella Avenue are considered as a single, integrated development, additional driveways may be permitted subject to the Standard Driveway Detail requirements of the Public Works Department. DRAF"I' 20-16 ~-9-04 Anaheim "Coning Code Platinwn Triangle iViixed Use Ova; lay Iona .0304 Driveway ~~/idth Dimensions. Driveways shall be a mininuun of twenty- lour (24) feet wide. and a masitnum of thirty-five (35) feet wide. in order to enhance the pedestrian est~endnce, \t~ider widths may be allowed if oedestrian eirculatien is not si~,nificaittly com,pramised,_subiect to the approval of the City"s Traffic and Transportation Matta*er based on 901IIid en~lneerlnC practices. .040 Streets. As provided in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Comiector Streets and a "ivtarket Street" wilt be required within the PTMU Overlay Zone. The location of these streets shall be in conformance with The Platinum Triant*le Master Laird Use Plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer based on a?t access and alignment study.-<ld~~itional t'onner u?r 5tretas may be required 1n' the City luicinecr bawd or. proiected traffic volumes as determined b~° a traffic study. .0401 The streets shall be designed to comply with the cross sections in The Platinum Triangle Master Land tJse Plan provided that the final width, including supplemental turn lanes if reyuired, shall be determined based on anticipated traffic volumes analyzed as part of a project specific traffic impact study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. .0402 Traffic calming and special street design features such as enhanced paving and parkway tapers at intersections are permitted and encouraged, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 050 Loading Areas. Off-street loading spaces shall be provided as follows: .0501 Non residential uses ofF=street loading requirements shall comply with requirements of Section 18.42.100 (Loading Requirements). .0502 Residential uses. .O1 Residential uses shall have one (1)off--sweet loading space or moving plaza for every one hundred and fifty (150) units. andlor elevators. 02 Loading spaces or moving plazas shall be located near entries .03 Loading spaces or moving plazas shall be incorporated into the design of vehicular access areas. .04 Decorative paving, removable bollards and potted. plants are permitted and encouraged to enhance loading spaces or moving plazas. .05 Loading spaces or moving plazas maybe located on a local or Connector Street with the approval oftlte City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The adjacent parkway and. setback landscape treatment shall be designed to allow for loading and unloading. 18.20.130 IeEF'LJSE $T®Id~i~Y/ A.NI? Ltt/C'~'CI.IlVG F'.~CII,Y'I"IES ANY9 I'IZIV~'I'iC Via'®IBAGIr AI2YilvS .010 Refuse Storage and Recycling Facilities. Refuse storage areas and recycling facilities shall conform to the standards set forth in the document entitled "Refuse Container Enclosure for Multiple-Family Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Use" {Form li9) on file with the City of Anaheim or as otherwise approved by the Director of Public Worls, with the additional requirement that the refuse storage facilities for residential and non-residential users shall be maintained as separate facilities and shall not allow commingling of the separate DRAFT ?0-17 3-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0103 R%all signs shall be placed between the o~round floor doot~ays aitd the upper facades and shall be located at approximately the same height to create a unifying, - -- - horizontal pattern. .020 Applicability of other Regulations. The provisions in Chapter 18.44 {Signs);"shall apply to projects within the PTMU Overlay Zone except as provided below: .0201 Awning signs and projecting signs are permitted for buildings with eround floor commercial uses. .0202 Thematic elements or three-dimensional object or non-habitable structure such as a gateway. tower, sculpture, spire and similar architectueat features to entertain pedestrians are permitted. 18.20.160 COIV1Pf"'Y'1[1~9,1'1'i~ S'Y'AIVD S. The following standards are intended to ensure the compatibility of uses in a mixed-use project. .010 Secm~ity. Residential units shall be designed to ensure the security of residents tluough the provision of secured entrances and exits that are separate from the non-residential uses and are directly accessible to parking areas. Non-residential and residential uses shall not have common entrance hallways or common balconies. These separations shall be shown on the development plan and the separations shall be permanently maintained. .020 Restriction on Activities. Commercial uses shall be designed and operated, and hours of operation limited, so that neighboring residents are not exposed to offensive noise, especially from traffic, trash collection, routine deliveries or late night activity. No use shall produce continual loading or unloading of heavy trucks at the site between the hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. .040 Vibrations .and Odors. No use, activity or process shall produce continual vibrations or noxious odors that are perceptible without instruments by the average person at the property lines of the site or within the interior of residential units on the site. .050 Lighting. Outdoor lighting associated with commercial uses shall not adversely impact surrounding residential uses, but shall provide sufficient illumination for access and security purposes. Such lighting shall not blink, flash, or oscillate. .050 Windows. Residential windows shall not directly face loading areas and docks. To the extent windows of residential units face each other, Use windows shall be offset to maximize privacy. 18.20.170 F164PL>Cl4'1Ji110.r'1'A'1')<O1V. An approved Final Site Plan and a Development Agreement between the property owner and the City of Anaheim are required for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone in the patella Avenue. Gene Autry and Ciatewav Districts except as exempt under subsection 13.20.170.020.0201 {Development Agreement Exemptions). Develornnent within the Stadium and Arena Districts shall be subject to ttie requirements of the underlYine PR fiPublic Recreatianl or T (Transitional) 7_.ones .010 Final Site Plan Review. A Final Site Plan Application for davelotnnent in the ICat~lla. Gene Autrv and C7ate~wa4 Disuricts shall be submitted to the Planning Department fnr DRAFT 20-23 II-4-0=t Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zooe review and approval by the Planning Director as to conformance with the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and The PlatinLml Triangle i~2astzr Land Use Plan. Said application shall include, but not be Limited to, Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscape Plans, Sign Plans and any other such information as determined by the Planning Director. The approved Final Site Plan shall be attached as an exhibit to the Development Agreement as required pursuant to subsection18.20.170.020 (Development Agreement} and submitted to Planning Commission and City Council for review at a noticed Public Hearing. .0101 Variances. A Final Site Plan which includes a request for a Variance shall have an application for said Variance processed concurrently with the Development Agreement. .0102 Conditional Use Permit. A Final Site Plan which includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit shall have an application for said Conditional Use Permit processed concurrently with the Development Agreement. .020 Development Agreement. A Development Agreement shall be processed for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone except as exempt under subsection 18.20.170.020.0201 (Development Agreement Exemptions} per Resolution No. 82R-565 (Procedures Resolution) adopted by the City pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute. The form of the Development Agreement shall be as approved per City Council Resolution No. on file in the Office of the City Clerk. A Final Site Plan found to be in accordance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan shall be attached as alr exhibit to said Development Agreement. :0201 Development Agreement Exemptions - Followi9ng construction and commencement of operation of a project That has been implemented pursuant to an approved Development Agreement, the following projects or improvements do not require a Development Agreement; however, plans for said projects or improvements shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval for consistency with all applicable provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan prior to the issuance of building, landscape or sign permits. .O1 Interior building alterations, modifications or improvements which do not rzsult in an increase in the gross square footage of the building. .02 Minor building additions or improvements interior to or at the rear of a building or development complex which are not visible from the public right-of--way; do not exceed 5% of the building's gross square footage or 1;000 square feet, whichever is lesser; are in substantial conformance with the building envelope; and, are in conformance with the Desigm Plan and the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in this chapter. .03 Exterior facade improvements which do not add to the gross square footage of a building or development complex; are not visible from the public right-of--way; do not exceed five percent (5 %) of the building's gross square footage or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is lesser; and, are in substantial conformance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and'I'he Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. 04 Signage, including wall signs, and on-site directional/informational signs, except as conditionally pernritted, and which signs are in confornance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. DRAFT 20-24 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle IvIixed U;e Overlay Zone .OS Landscape/hardseape improvements or modifications which are not in connection with building modifications and are in conformance with the PT~1U Overlay -- - - Zone and The Platinum Trian,le Master Land Use Plan. .0° Conditionally permitted uses that will not increase the square footage or parking demand of the ewisting development as determined by the Platuring Director and City Engineer. .030 Environmental Review. Development Agreement Review by the Planning Conmiission shall include an environmerrtal determination for the proposed project as depicted in the Pinal Site Ptan. DRAFT 20-_S g_9.Oq Develorament Agreement Corrections and Omissions 9.2.I Water Ser<riee. OWNER will provide engineering studies to size the water mains for ultimate development within flee Project. Said engineering studies will be conducted prior to rendering os 3vatea• see•~~iee or sigeaataare approval of the final water iaaaproveeaBent plaeas, whichever Decors fprst. The studies shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager, Public Utilities Department or aenthorized designee. 1 he water system maybe constructed incrementally, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide municipal demands az~d fire flow protection for the proposed development phasing. OliJIVER will conform with Rule 1~D of the Water Utility's Rates, Rules and Regulations ~~-hich provides for, in part, a fee based on GFA and the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water facilities. OWNER shall be entitled to reimbursement in accordance with the terms of Rule ISD for the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water facilities. 12.3..1 Water Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all applicable fees in accordance wi#h the Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service including Rule 15D zvhich provides for, lea part, a fee based on ~F'A to construct flee necessarg~ avatar facili4y ienproventents avithin The )Platananan'Triangle. ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACHMENT F RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2004-00032 RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-000 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTER 18.20 "SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY (SE) ZONE" IN ITS ENTIRETY. (ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2004-00032). WHEREAS, the Zoning Code was originally adopted in 1929 and has been updated a number of times over the years; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.76 (Zoning Amendments) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, provisions of Title 18 may be amended whenever the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require, when adopted by an ordinance of the City Council :in the manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific :Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business OfficelMixed Usellndustrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed- use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter- modal transportation .hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and .arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The :Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; CR\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3:0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the 0-H (High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes recommendations to the City Council regarding Zoning Code Amendments; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Consultant, City Staff and the City Attorney's Office have prepared the proposed replacement to Chapter 18.20, entitled "Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone", designated as Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, copies of which have been provided to the Anaheim City Planning Commission, including certain corrections and omissions thereto which are set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 9, 2004, attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (the "Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone"); and WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone will, if adopted, amend Chapter 18.20 "Sports Entertainment Overlay (SE) Zone" of the Anaheim Municipal Code, in its entirety; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and fn accordance with the provisions of state'law, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, having reviewed and considered The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, has determined that the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require its adoption, in that The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone: 1. Implements the Goals and Policies in the Land Use and Community Design Elements of the Anaheim General Plan, as set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 9, 2004; 2. Updates the permitted land uses and standards to reflect development factors and design trends which have changed over time, and 3. Facilitates the use and ease of finding land use and development information in the Zoning Code, and WHEREAS, _ people were present in opposition of the proposal; _ people spoke in favor of the subject request. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to approve Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 in conjunction with the proposed Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and -2- PC2004- Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead .agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial . _ Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the 0-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving the Proposed Zoning Code Amendment, as modified by the Planning Commission during the public hearing. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Pat Chandler, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC2004- ATTACHMEPIT A -4- PC2004- Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Chapter 18.20 PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXE® USE (PTMU) ®VERLAY ZONE Sections: 18.20..010 Purpose and intent. 18.20.020 Applicability. 18.20.030 Uses. 18.20.040 Development districts. 18.20.050 Structural beigbks. 18.20.060 Coverage. 18.20.070 Project size. 18.20.080 Floor area. 18.20.090 Structural setbacks. 18.20.100 Structural location and building orientation. 18.20.110 Public parks, recreational-leisure areas and landscaping 18.20.120 Parking, loading and vehicular access. 18.20.130 Refuse storage and recycling facilities and private storage areas 18.20.140 Design standards. 18.20.150 Signs.. 18.20.160 Compatibility standards. 18.20.170 Implementation. 18.20.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT. .010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone (hereinafter referred to as the "PTMU Overlay Zone") to provide opportunities for well-designed development projects that combine residential with non- residential uses including office, retail, business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities within the portions of The Platinum Triangle designated with the Mixed-Use land use designation in the City of Anaheim General Plan, and consistent with the policy direction in the General Plan. .020 Objectives. The PTMU Overlay Zone has the following major objectives: .0201 Create a unique integrated, walkable urban environment that encourages pedestrian activity and reduces dependence on the automobile for everyday needs through a streetscape that is connected, attractive, safe and engaging. .0202 Develop an overall urban design framework to ensure that the appearance and effects of buildings, improvements, and uses are harmonious with the character of the area in which they are located. .0203 Encourage compatibility between residential, commercial and sports entertainment uses. .0204 Reinforce Transit Oriented Development (TOD) opportunities around the existing Amtrak/Metrolink and the proposed Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) stations. DRAFT 20-I 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0205 Maintain and enhance connectivity and linkages with convenience services, dining, retail and recreation facilities within walking distance by providing ground floor commercial uses in key locations. .0206 Provide a mix of housing types. .0207 Create great long-lasting neighborhoods that maintain value through buildings with architectural qualities that create attractive street scenes. .0208 Provide a variety of open space including private, recreational-leisure areas and public parks. 0209 Create a balance of landscape and architecture by providing sufficient planting space. .0210 Encourage parking solutions that are incentives for creative planning and sustainable neighborhood design. .0211 Stimulate market driven development investment. 18.20.020 APPLICABILITY. .010 The Platinum Triangle comprises approximately eight hundred twenty (820) acres generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company Easement on the north. The PTMU Overlay Zone covers an area consisting of approximately three hundred and seventy-five (375) acres within The Platinum Triangle, as depicted in Figure 3 (General Plan Designations) of The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan approved by the City Council on _, and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, said Figure 3 is incorporated herein by this reference. .020 Applicable Regulations. The provisions of this chapter shall supersede the corresponding regulations of the underlying zones, except as provided below. .030 Option to Use Underlying Zone. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to parcels that have been or are proposed to be developed entirely under the underlying zone, provided that all requirements of the underlying zone are met by the project except as specifically approved otherwise by variance or other official action by the City. 18.20.030 USES. .010 Primary Uses. Table 20-A (Primary Uses: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) sets forth allowable primary uses for the PTMU Overlay Zone, listed by classes of uses as defined in Section 18.36.030 (Residential Primary Use Classes) and Section 18.36.040 (Non-residential Primary Use Classes) of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .020 Accessory Uses. Table 20-B (Accessory Uses and Structures: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) sets forth allowable accessory uses and structures for the PTMU Overlay Zone, listed by classes of uses as defined in Section 18.36.050 (Accessory Use Classes) of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). DRAFT 20-2 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .030 Temporary Uses. Table 20-C (Temporary Uses and Structures: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) sets forth allowable temporary uses and structures °- for the PTMU Overlay Zone, listed by classes of uses as defined in Section 18.36.060 (Temporary Use Classes) of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses). .040 The allowable uses in Tables 20-A, 20-B and 20-C aze established by letter designations as follows: .0401 "P" designates classes of uses permitted by right; :0402 "C" designates classes of uses permitted with a conditional use permit; .0403 "N" designates classes of uses that are prohibited; and .0404 "GF" designates classes of uses that are considered ground floor commercial for the PTMU Overlay Zone. .050 Ground-Floor Commercial Uses. In order to encourage an active street life while accommodating market demand, ground floor commercial uses facing the street aze required along "Mazket Street" and on Gene Autry Way, east of Market Street as identified on Figure 4 (The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan) in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Ground floor commercial uses aze identified in Tables 20-A, 20-B and 20-C, and may include the non-residential portion of live/work units, or may be designed so that the space may be used for either residential or non-residential uses where the residential portion does not face the street. Ground floor commercial uses are also permitted along all other streets within the PTMU Overlay Zone. .0501 Ground floor commercial uses as designated in Tables 20-A, 20-B and 20- C shall have a minimum depth no less than thirty (30) feet along "Mazket Street" and Gene Autry Way, east of Market Street, as identified on Figure 4 of The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The total amount of ground floor commercial along these two streets shall not exceed 150,000 square feet of gross floor area. .060 Live/Work Units. A commercial land use may be combined with a residential land use within one unit to create a space that contains both a residence and commercial azea such as an office. .070 Unlisted Uses. Any class of use that is not listed in Tables 20-A, 20-B and 20-C is prohibited unless a determination is made by the Planning Director to allow the submission of an application for a conditional use permit to approve the use. .080 Interpreting Classes of Uses. The provisions for interpreting the classes of uses in Tables 20-A, 20-B or 20-C aze set forth in Section 18.36.020 (Classification of Uses) in Chapter 18.36 {Types of Uses). .090 Special Provisions. Special provisions related to a use are referenced in the "Special Provisions" column of Tables 20-A, 20-B and 20-C. Such provisions may include references to other applicable code sections or limitations to the specified land use. DRAFT 20-3 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Table 20-A P Permitted by Right PRIMARY USES: C Conditional Use Permit Required THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE N Prohibited MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE GF Ground Floor Commercial PTMU GF Special Provisions Residential Classes of Uses Dwellings-Multiple Family P Dwellings-Single-Family Attached P Dwellings-Single-Family Detached N Senior Citizen Housing C Subject to Chapter 18.50 (Senior Citizens' Apartment Projects) Non-Residential Classes of Uses Alcoholic Beverage Sales-Off-Sale C GF Alcoholic Beverage Sales-On-Sale C GF Antennas-Broadcasting P Subject to Section 18.38.060 (Antennas -telecommunications) Automotive-Public Parking C Automotive, truck, trailer and other N vehicle sales Automotive-Service Station C Bars & Nightclubs C GF Billboards N Business & Financial Services P GF Breweries C GF Including the on-premise sale and consumption of beer or ale Commercial Retail Centers C Community & Religious Assembly C GF Computer Internet & Amusement C GF Facilities Conversions of hotels or motels to N semi-permanent living quarters Dance & Fitness Studios-Large P GF Dance & Fitness Studios-Small P GF Day Care Centers C GF Drive-up or drive-through services N Hotels & Motels P/C/N Hotels are permitted, extended-stay hotels are permitted by CUP, motels are not permitted (See Chapter 18.93 for definitions) Markets-Large P GF Outdoor farmer's markets are allowed with a conditional use permit Markets-Small P GF Pawnshops N Personal Services-General P GF On-site dry cleaning not allowed; conditional use permit required for laundromats Personal Services-Restricted C GF Offices P GF DRAFT 20-4 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Table 20-A P Permitted by Right PRIMARY USES: C Conditional Use Permit Required THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE N Prohibited MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE GF Ground Floor Commercial PTMU GF Special Provisions Public Services Recreation-Bowling & Billiards Recreation-Commercial Indoor Recreation-Commercial Outdoor Recreation-Lo w-Impact Recreation-Swimming & Tennis Recycling Services-Consumer Repair Services-Limited Rescue missions, shelters for the homeless Research and Development Facilities Restaurants-General Restaurants-Semi-Enc I osed Restaurants-Walk-Up Retail Sales-General Retail Sales-Kiosks Retail Sales-Regional Secondhand shops Sex-oriented businesses, as defined in Chapter 18.54 (Sex-Oriented Businesses) Studios-Broadcasting Studios-Recording Swap meets, indoor or outdoor Transit Facilities Utilities-Major Utilities-Minor Uses or activities not listed, nor specifically prohibited P P P C P P P GF GF GF P N C P GF P GF P P P P N N C P N P C P C GF GF GF Subject to Chapter 18.48 (Recycling Facilities); reverse vending machines located entirely within a structure do not require any zoning approval Subject to Section 18.38.220 (Restaurants -outdoor seating and dining) As determined by the Planning Commission to be compatible with the intended ouroose of the PTMU Overlav Zone. DRAFT 20-5 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Table 20-B ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES: THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE P Permitted by Right C Conditional Use Permit Required N Prohibited GF Ground Floor Commercial PTMU GF Special Provisions Amusement Devices P Subject to Chapter 4.14 (Amusement devices) Animal Keeping P Subject to Section ] 8.38.030 (Animal keeping) Antennas-Private Transmitting P Subject to Section 18.38.040 (Antennas -private transmitting) Antennas-Receiving P Subject to Section 18.38.050 (Antennas -receiving) Caretaker Units C Subject to Section 18.38.090 (Caretaker units) Day Care-Large Family C Subject to Section 18.38.140 (Large family day care homes) Day Care-Small Family P Fences R Walls P Subject to Section 18.40.050 (Special area setbacks); this use may occur on a lot with or without a primary use Home Occupations P Subject to Section 18.38.130 (Home occupations) Landscaping & Gardens P Subject to Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and screening) Mechanical Utility and Equipment- P Subject to Section 18.38.160 (Mechanical and utility equipment- Ground Mounted ground mounted) Mechanical Utility and Equipment- P Subject to Section 18.38.170 (Mechanical and utility equipment- RoofMounted roof mounted) and Section 18.20.150 (Design standards) of this chapter Murals P/C Permitted when not visible from right-of--way or adjacent properties. Conditional use where visible from any Public right-of--way or adjacent properties. Parking Lots & Garages P Portable Food Carts C Recreation Buildings & Structures P GF Signs F Subject to Chapter 18.44 (Signs) and section 18.20.160 (Signs) of this chapter Solar Energy Panels P Must be mounted on the roof and, if visible from the street level, must be parallel to the roof plane Vending Machines P Shall be screened from view from public rights-of--way and shall not encroach onto sidewalks Table 20-C P Permitted by Right TEMPORARY USES AND STRUCTURES: C Conditional Use Permit Required THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE N Prohibited MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE GF Ground Floor Commercial PTMU GF Special Provisions Contractor's OfFce & Storage P Subject to Section 18.38.105 (Contractor's office and storage) Open-Air Festivals P Requires all applicable City permits Special Events P Subject to Section 18.38.240 (Special events) DRAFT 20-6 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code 18.20.040 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS. Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .010 Purpose. To permit the maximum amount of development in The Platinum Triangle consistent with the General Plan and the infrastructure capacity analyzed by EIR No. 330, the PTMU Overlay Zone establishes land use intensities for each of the following Development Districts: Arena District, Gateway District, Gene Autry District, Katella District and Stadium District. The boundaries of the Development Districts are depicted in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .020 Table 20-D (Development Intensities: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) indicates the maximum land use intensities analyzed by EIR No. 330. The Planning Department will maintain an accounting of the total amount of square footage approved within each district. Development shall not exceed the overall total land use intensity for The Platinum Triangle (PTMU) Overlay or the intensity identified for each District. Table 10-D DEVELOPMENT INTENS/T/ES: THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE Maximum District Maximum Dwelling Maximum Office Commercial Square Units Square Footage Footage Arena 425 100,000 100,000 Gateway 1,750 530,000 50,000 Gene Autry 1,D00 100,000 50,000 Katella 4,250 775;000 544,300 Stadium 1,750 1,760,000 1,300,000 Total 9,175 3,265,000 2,044,300 DRAFT 20-7 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code 18.20.050 STRUCTURAL HEIGHTS. Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone The height requirements for the PTMU Overlay Zone are shown in Table 20-E (Maximum Structural Height: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) and apply in addition to the Structural Height Limitations in Chapter 18.40 (General Development Standards). Greater heights are permitted in connection with a conditional use permit as set forth in Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permit) provided that plans submitted in connection with a conditional use permit for higher heights within 600 feet north or south of Gene Autry Way shall demonstrate that views of Angel Stadium of Anaheim from the Anaheim Convention Center and from Gene Autry Way and the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway (looking west towards the Stadium) are not significantly obstructed. Table 20-E MAXIMUM STRUCTURAL HE/GHT: THE PLAT/NUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAYZONE Maximum Height in Feet Within 300 feet north or south side of 55 Gene Autry Way Right-of--Way Between 300 and 600 feet north or south 75 of the Gene Autry Way Right-of--Way Arena and S[adium Districts Unlimited All other properties 100 18.20.060 COVERAGE. .010 Site Coverage. The maximum site coverage for the PTMU Overlay Zone is seventy-five percent (75%). .0101 Coverage is the sum of the area of all building footprint azeas and the area of exposed parking divided by the gross azea of the parcel excluding Mazket Street or Connector Streets and/or any required public right-of--way. For purpose of coverage calculations, parking is not considered exposed when landscape, patios and pool decks are located on the top level of a pazking structure. .0102 Accessory Buildings and Structures. All accessory buildings and structures, shall be included in the maximum site coverage calculation. 18.20.070 PROJECT SIZE. The residential project size requirements are as follows: 010 The minimum residential project size shall be fifty (50) dwelling units. .020 Residential projects of more than four hundred (400) dwelling units on parcels of five (5) acres or greater shall consist of more than one (1) building type, as defined in Table 20-F (Building Types: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone). .030 Building Site Requirements in Chapter 18.40 (General Development Standards) shall also apply. DRAFT 20-8 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Tablc 20-F BUILDING TYPES: THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE Typical Density Range Building Type UnitType Units/acre Definition Tuck-under Townhomes 16-24 Residential buildings in which individual parking garages are Flats 18-30 located under the living unit but still accessed by surface driveways Wrapped Deck Flats 45-80 Residential buildings that surround, or wrap around, a free- standing (not subterranean) parking structure Podium Townhomes 16-32 Residential buildings located above a subterranean parking Flatslfownhomes 36-65 structure Fla[s 48-100 Mid-rise Tower Fla[s 65-100 Residential building of a height between 5 and 20 stories 18..20.080 FLOOR AREA. The minimum floor area for dwelling units are shown in Table 20-G (Minimum Floor Area: The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone), .010 Calculations. For purposes of this section, a "bedroom" is a private habitable room planned or used for sleeping, separated from other rooms by a door or a similar partition. Further, all rooms (other than a living room, family ropm, dining room, bathroom, hall, lobby, closet, or pantry) having seventy (70) squaze feet or more of floor azea, or less than fifty percent (50%) of the total length of any wall open to an adjacent room or hallway, shall be considered a "bedroom." Table 20-G MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: PLAT/NUM Minimum Floor Area ZONE Studio units: 550 square feet, provided, however, that the number of studio units shall not exceed 20% of the total number of units per residential building One-bedroom units: Two-bedroom units: Three-bedroom units: More than a three bedroom unit: 650 square feet 825 square feet 1,000 square feet 1,000 square feet plus 200 square feet for each bedroom over three DRAFT 20-9 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code 18.20.090 STRUCTURAL SETBACKS. Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Every building or structure erected under the provisions of this zone shall be provided with setbacks as follows: .010 Setbacks Abutting Public Rights-of--Way, Private Streets and Alleys. .0101 Minimum Open Setback. All properties shall have a minimum open setback for the full width of the property as indicated in Table 20-H (Structural Setbacks Abutting Public Rights-of--Way, Private Streets and Alleys) and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .Ol Setbacks abutting Public Rights-of--Way shall be pazallel to the centerline of the adjoining public rights-of--way and shall be measured from the ultimate right-of- way as indicated in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. .02 Setbacks abutting private streets or alleys shall be pazallel to the centerline of the adjoining private street or alley and measured from the private access easement. .0102 Required Improvement of Setbacks. Setbacks abutting public rights-of- way, private streets and .alleys shall be landscaped with lawn, trees, shrubs or other plants and/or decorated hard surface expansion of the sidewalk as set forth in Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening), Table 20-H and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Setback areas shall be permanently maintained in a neat and orderly manner. .0103 Permitted Encroachments. Setbacks abutting public rights-of--way, private streets and alleys may include the following encroachments: .O1 Patios, residential buildings and ground floor commercial uses that encroach into the required street setback no more than the maximum amount allowed per Table 20-H and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .02 Walkway connections to building entrances, provided that special paving treatment or modular paving materials aze used. .03 Vehicular and bike accessways. .04 Transit stops. .OS Outdoor seating and dining areas in conjunction with full-service restaurants, coffee shops, and bakeries, provided that such aeeas shall be designed to not adversely affect the safe and efficient circulation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, :06 Public art displays, fountains, ponds, planters, outdoor seating areas, benches, decorative trash receptacles, planters, public plazas, or other similaz amenities and attractive street furnishings that create public gathering places. .07 Newsracks that are designed to be aesthetically harmonious with the character of the area and not cause obstruction or adversely affect the safe and efficient circulation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. .08 Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills, buttresses and fireplaces that encroach into the required street setback no more than thirty-six (36) inches. .09 Awnings, canopies and arcades. DRAFT 20-10 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .10 Open, unenclosed balconies that encroach into the required street setback no more than three (3) feet. .1 ] Covered or ttncovered entrances that do not extend above the level of the first floor of the building and that include a wall not more than thirty-six (36) inches in height that encroach into the required street setback no more than five (5) feet. .12 Fences, walls and hedges that comply with Section 18.46.110 _ (Landscaping and Screening) and subsection 18.20.30.. .0104 Improvement of Walkways Required. Adjacent to State College Boulevard, Gene Autry Way and Orangewood Avenue, the portion of the setback adjacent to the right-of--way shall be improved with a walkway as indicated in Table 20-H and as shown in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. An easement for said walkway shall be provided to the City. Table 20-H STRUCTURAL SETBACKS ABUTTING PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, PRIVATE STREETS AND ALLEYS: THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE Permitted Street Minimum Setback Encroachments Required Landscape Katella 18 feet Patios: 8 feet The area between residential patios and the Avenue sidewalWwalkway (see below) shall be fully Residential landscaped buildings: 3 feet* • Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% of the setback area may be paved Ground floor • A date palm matching the date palm in the public commercial: 4 feet right-of--way in spacing and height shall be installed 5 feet from the right-of--way as indicated on the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan State South of Gene Autry Way : 13 feet Patios: 8 feet The area between residential patios and the College = North of Gene Autry Way to railroad sidewalWwalkway (see below) shall be fully Boulevard grade separation: 16 feet Residential landscaped • Adjacent to railroad grade buildings: 3 feet* Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% separation: per subsection of the setback area may be paved 18.20.090.0104 Ground floor A 2.5' walkway shall be provided adjacent to ROW, commercial: 4 feet • North of railroad grade separation: scored to match adjacent sidewalk and an easement 20 Feet provided to the City, north of Gene Autry Way to the railroad grade separation Gene Autry 12 feet Patios: 5 feet • The area between residential patios and the Way sidewalk/walkway (see below) shall be fully Residential landscaped buildings: 3 feet* • Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% of the setback area may be paved Ground floor • A 2.5' walkway shall be provided adjacent to ROW, commercial: 5 feet scored to match adjacent sidewalk and an easement provided to the City * Residential buildings may encroach into the street setback area for no more than 30% of the length of the street elevation. DRAFT 20-11 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone Table 20-H (Continued) _. STRUCTURAL SETBACKS ABUTTING PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, PRIVATE STREETS AND ALLEYS: THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE Permitted Street Minimum Setback Encroachments Required Landscape Orangewood West of State College Blvd: 12 feet Patios: 8 feet The area between residential patios and the Avenue sidewalWwalkway (see below) shall be fully East of State College Blvd: IS fee[ Residential landscaped buildings: 3 feet* • Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% of the setback area may be paved Ground floor A 2.5' walkway shall be provided adjacent to ROW, commercial: 8 feet scored to match adjacent sidewalk and an easement provided to the City, east of State College Blvd. Douglass 14 feet Patios: 8 feet • The area between residential patios and the sidewalk Road shall be fully landscaped Residential • Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% buildings: 3 feet* of the setback area may be paved Ground floor commercial: 3 feet Railroad 10 feet None • Setback area shall be fully landscaped RO W Market 10 feet Ground floor • A maximum 30% of setback area may be landscaped Street commercial: 4 feet Connector 10 feet Patios: 7 feet • The area between residential patios and the sidewalk Streets/ shall be fully landscaped Wright Residential =Adjacent to ground floor commercial uses, up to 80% Circle/ buildings: 3 feet* of the setback area may be paved Private Streets Ground floor commercial: 3 feet Alleys 10 feet Patios: 2 feet • A minimum 4-foot-wide pedestrian walkway shall be provided parallel to the alley. Residential buildings: 2 feet* Ground floor Freeways 25 feet None • Setback area shall be fully landscaped * Residential buildings may encroach into the street setback area for no more than 30% of the length of the street elevation. DRAFT 20-12 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .020 Setbacks -Other. An open setback shall be provided between buildings and - -- interior lot lines and between buildings located on the same project site. Minimum setback requirements shall be measured perpendiculaz to building walls. .0201 Required Improvement of Setbacks. Required setbacks abutting interior property lines and setbacks between buildings shall be landscaped with lawn, trees, shrubs or other plants as indicated above and as set forth in Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening). Setback areas shall be permanently maintained in a neat and orderly manner. .0202 Setbacks Abutting Interior Property Lines. A minimum five (5) foot wide fully landscaped setback area shall be provided for structures abutting an interior property line along the entire length of the building. Where a fence or wall is provided along or adjacent to the interior property line, the five (5) foot wide fully landscaped setback shall be measured from the side of the fence or wall facing the property. .0203 Setbacks Between Buildings. A minimum twenty (20) foot wide setback between parallel walls of two (2) sepazate buildings shall be provided.. At least forty percent (40%) of the setback area between buildings shall be landscaped. .O1 Permitted Encroachments. The following encroachments are permitted, provided a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the setback area is landscaped: (a) Open, unenclosed balconies and/or private patios for ground floor residential units may encroach no more than five (5) feet. (b) Covered or uncovered entrances that do not extend above the level of the first floor of the building and that include a wall not more than thirty-six (36) inches in height may encroach no more than five (5) feet, .03 Outdoor recreational facilities. .04 Fountains, ponds, sculptures and planters. .OS Fences, walls and hedges that comply with Section 18.46.110 (Landscaping and Screening). - :06 Paved walkways, benches and plazas. .07 Vehicular accessways. .030 Parking, loading or unloading of privately owned and operated automobiles and other vehicles shall be prohibited in all required setbacks. .040 Required vehicle sight distances shall be maintained. No landscaping or other elements such as signs or fences exceeding twenty four (24) inches in height shall be permitted within the line-of--sight triangle described in Section 18.44.080 (Freestanding and Monument Signs -General) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) and as shown on Engineering Standazd Plan No. 115 (Pertaining to Commercial Drive Approaches) unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. .050 Modifications. The .setbacks prescribed in this section may be modified in connection with a conditional use permit as set forth in Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permit), provided that minimum landscape requirements are met. DRAFT 20-13 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone 18.20.100 STRUCTURAL LOCATION AND BUILDING ORIENTATION. All Buildings shall have the following orientation to the street: .010 All buildings shall be aligned either parallel or at right angles to the street rights- of-way. .020 All buildings adjacent to a public street shall maintain a continuous `street wall' formed by the edge of the building for a minimum of seventy percent (70%) of the lot/parcel frontage adjacent to the street. .030 Parking lots and structures shall not be located directly adjacent to a public street but shall be placed internal to the block in a location screened from view of the public right-of- way or subterranean to the building. .040 Parking Structures. Parking structures shall be screened from view of the public right-of--way. 18.20.110 PUBLIC PARKS, RECREATIONAL-LEISURE AREAS AND LANDSCAPING 010 Public Parks. Public pazks shall be provided as follows; .0101 Pazcels eight (8.0) acres or larger shall provide and construct an on-site public park at a minimum size of forty-four (44) square feet per unit. .O1 Said park shall be bounded on at least one side by a public street with on-street parking. .02 This requirement is in addition to the payment of park-in-lieu fees; however, the value of the parkland dedication will be credited against overall pazk in lieu fees paid for the project. This credit will be given for pazk land dedication only. No credit will be given for improvements to the pazk or for recreational-leisure areas as required subject to 18.20.110.020 (Recreational-Leisure Areas). .0102 Pazcels less than eight (8.0) acres in size shall pay apazk-in-lieu fee. .020 Recreational-Leisure Areas. Two hundred (200) squaze feet of recreational- leisure area shall be provided for each dwelling unit and may be provided by private azeas, common azeas, or a combination of both. .0201 Common Recreational-Leisure Areas. All common recreational-leisure areas shall be conveniently located and readily accessible from all dwelling units located on the building site and shall be integrated with and contiguous to other common azeas on the building site. The common recreational-leisure area may be composed of active or passive facilities and may incorporate any required setback areas other than .setback areas adjacent to public rights-of- way, private streets and alleys and interior property lines, but shall not include or incorporate any driveways or parking areas, trash pickup or storage azeas or utility areas. The common recreational-leisure azea shall have a minimum dimension often (10) feet. .O1 Improvement of Common Recreational-Leisure Areas. All common recreational-leisure areas shall be landscaped with lawn, trees, shrubs or other plants as set forth in Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) with the exception of reasonably DRAFT 20-14 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone required pedestrian walkways and paved recreational facilities such as swimming pools and decks and court game facilities. (a) Fountains, ponds, waterscape, sculpture, planters, benches and decorative screen-type walls installed incidentally to the primary plants in the landscaping shall be permitted and encouraged. (b) All required common recreational-leisure areas and other required open space areas shall be developed and professionally maintained in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation plans. (c) Courtyards internal to a project or enclosed on at least three (3) sides shall have a minimum width of forty (40) feet and shall be landscaped with a ratio of hardscape to planting not exceeding a ratio one (1) square foot of landscape to one (1) square foot of handscape. Pools and spas shall be excluded from this ratio. (d) The base of a building shall be separated from adjacent common recreational-leisure area by a planter allowing a minimum thirty (30) inches planting width. .0202 Private Recreational-Leisure Areas. In order for private patios and balconies to count towazd the Recreational-Leisure Area requirement, they must comply with the following: .Ol Any private patios for ground floor units shall not be less than one hundred (100) square feet in area, with a minimum dimension of eight (8) feet. .02 Private balconies for dwelling units located entirely above the ground floor shall not be less than seventy (70) squaze feet in area, with a minimum dimension of seven (7) feet. :030 Landscaping. Landscaping, including fences, walls and hedges, shall be permitted and/or required subject to the conditions and limitations set forth herein and in Chapter 18.46 (Landscaping and Screening) except that the minimum plant size for a Date Palm, which shall be 30-foot brown trunk height and a Mexican Fan Palm, which shall be 20-foot brown trunk height. 18.20.120 PARHING, LOADING, AND VEHICULAR ACCESS .010 Parking Demand Study. Due to variations in pazking demand and needs of each project, vehicle pazking requirements and the design of the parking azeas, including ingress and egress, shall be determined as part of the final site plan review process by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager based upon information contained in a pazking demand study prepazed by an independent traffic engineer, as approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The pazking demand study shall be prepared at the property owner/developer's expense and provided at the time of application for the use. DRAFT 20-15 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0101 Number of Spaces for Residential Uses. The following minimum Pazking requirements shall be used in determining Pazking need: Table 20-I MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS: THE PLATINUM TIRANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE Total Number of Bedrooms Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Per Unit 1 bedroom 1.5 spaces 2 bedroom 2.0 spaces 3 bedroom 2.5 spaces 4 bedroom 3.5 spaces .0102 Number of Spaces for Non-Residential Uses. The number of parking spaces for non-residential uses shall be determined by the type of use (use class) specified in Table 42-A (Non-Residential Pazking Requirements) of Chapter 42 (Parking and Loading). .0102 On-Street Parking. Pazking located on a private or public street directly in front of a use may be considered for Pazking credit as part of the parking demand study. .0103 Tandem Pazking. Tandem Parking may be permitted in conjunction with subterranean parking and tuck-under buildings, where both spaces are assigned to the same designated dwelling unit. .0104 Valet Pazking. Valet Pazking may be permitted in conjunction with subterranean Pazking, provided valet services are provided for and managed by an on-site management company or homeowner's association. .020 Designation of Pazking for Residential and Non-Residential Uses. Parking spaces specifically designated for non-residential and residential uses shall be marked by the use of posting, pavement mazkings, and/or physical sepazation. Parking design shall incorporate separate entrances and exits, or a designated lane, for residents, so that residents aze not waiting in line behind non-residential drivers. .030 Vehicle Access. All vehicle access shall be designed and improved in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer. .0301 Primary Vehicle Access. Parcels located adjacent to Connector Streets shall have their primary vehicle access off of said streets. :0302 Minimum Distance Between Driveways of Arterials. The minimum distance between adjacent driveways on the same site or adjacent properties located along arterials shall be not less than three hundred and fifty (350) feet except as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. .0303 Vehicular Access from Katella Avenue. When two or more parcels or lots located adjacent to Katella Avenue aze considered as a single, integrated development, additional driveways may be permitted subject to the Standazd Driveway Detail requirements of the Public Works Department. DRAFT 20-16 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0304 Driveway Width Dimensions. Driveways shall be a minimum of twenty- four (24) feet wide, and a maximum of thirty-five (35) feet wide, in order to enhance the pedestrian experience. Wider widths may be allowed if pedestrian circulation is not significantly compromised, subject to the approval of the City's Traffic and Transportation Manager based on sound engineering practices. .040 Streets. As provided in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Connector Streets and a "Market Street" will be required within the PTMU Overlay Zone. The location of these streets shall be in conformance with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and shall be approved by the City Engineer based on an access and alignment study. Additional Connector Streets may be required by the City Engineer based on projected traffic volumes as determined by a traffic study. .0401 The streets shall be designed to comply with the cross sections in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan provided that the final width, including supplemental turn lanes if required, shall be determined based on anticipated traffic volumes analyzed as part of a project specific traffic impact study to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. .0402 Traffic calming and special street design features such as enhanced paving and parkway tapers at intersections are permitted and encouraged, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. .050 Loading Areas. Off-street loading spaces shall be provided as follows: .0501 Non residential uses off-street loading requirements shall comply with requirements of Section 18.42.100 (Loading Requirements). 0502 Residential uses. .O1 Residential uses shall have one (1) off-street loading space or moving plaza for every one hundred and fifty (150) units. and/or elevators. 02 Loading spaces or moving plazas shall be located near entries .03 Loading spaces or moving plazas shall be incorporated into the design of vehicular access areas. .04 Decorative paving, removable bollazds and potted plants are permitted and encouraged to enhance loading spaces or moving plazas. .OS Loading spaces or moving plazas may be located on a local or Connector Street with the approval of the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The adjacent parkway and setback landscape treatment shall be designed to allow for loading and unloading.. 18.20.130 REFUSE STORAGE AND RECYCLING FACILITIES AND PRIVATE STORAGE AREAS .010 Refuse Storage and Recycling Facilities. Refuse storage .areas and recycling facilities shall conform to the standazds set forth in the document entitled "Refuse Container Enclosure for Multiple-Family Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Use" (Form 139) on file with the City of Anaheim or as otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works, with the additional requirement that the refuse storage facilities for residential and non-residential users shall be maintained as separate facilities and shall not allow commingling of the separate DRAFT 20-17 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone facilities. The storage areas shall be screened from adjacent public or private rights-of--way, or railroads. .020 Private Storage Areas. General storage cabinets with a minimum size of one hundred (100) cubic feet capacity shall be required for each dwelling unit. Provision of said storage areas shall be in addition to the minimum floor azea of the unit. Storage areas may be. located inside the dwelling unit, adjacent to the dwelling unit's balcony or patio or in close proximity to the dwelling unit. 18.20.140 DESIGN STANDARDS. .010 The design of buildings within The Platinum Triangle shall be of the highest quality in massing, design details and amenities. .020 Amenities. High quality recreational and service amenities to serve the tenants of the residential complexes shall be provided. Such amenities may include, but are not limited to, private health clubs or fitness centers, meeting rooms, recreational rooms, pools, spas, dry cleaning collection and distribution, computer facilities, barbecues, decks, court game facilities, and community fireplaces. .030 Integrated Design. The design of buildings, signs, landscaping and other structures or elements shall feature a unified and integrated theme. 040 Architectural Massing. .0401 Regardless of style, a building shall not have a continuous roof or pazapet line exceeding one hundred twenty (120) feet in length without vertical breaks that cause a change in height of at least six (6) feet. .0402 When a building exceeds two hundred forty (240) feet in length, building height shall step down in at least one location at least one (1) floor for a minimum length of twenty-four (24) feet. .0403. The wall plane of a building fapade shall not extend longer than eighty (80) feet without a break in the plane no less than three (3) feet in depth. :050 Facades. .0501 Street wall facades shall be architecturally enhanced through the use of arcades, colonnades, recessed entrances, window details, bays, variation in building materials, and other details such as cornices and contrasting colors. Total blank wall areas (without windows or entrances) are prohibited. In addition to architectural massing requirements, building facades shall be articulated through the use of separated wall surfaces, contrasting colors and materials, variations in building setbacks, and attractive window fenestrations. .0502 Street wall facades shall be integrated with public plazas, mini parks, outdoor dining, and other pedestrian-oriented amenities. .0503 Buildings at comers of any street intersection not identified as requiring landmark architecture in The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, shall receive special treatment to enhance the pedestrian experience and create visual interest and focal points at the entryways such as but not limited to, building cut-offs and corner entrances with additional architectural detail. DRAFT 20-1$ 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0504 Tops of building facades shall be visually terminated through the use of cornices, stepped pazapets, hip and mansard roofs, stepped terraces, domes and other forms of __ multifaceted building tops. .060 Architectural Detail :0601 Buildings on corners must address both streets with an equal level of architectural detail. .0602 Projecting features to create visual interest and distinction between units, such as balconies, porches, bays, and dormer windows, are required. Trim detail on rooflines, porches, windows and doors on street-facing elevations aze required. .0603 When trim is used, a minimum of one-inch by four-inch (1" x 4") trim is required. .0604 With stucco walls, a minimum one-inch (1 ") deep raised relief around the window may be used. windows. :0605 With brick, a minimum two-inch (2") wide brickmold is required around .0606 Corner boards (the board which siding is fitted at the comer of a frame structure) are required with wood or simulated wood sidings. .0607 Dormers must be authentic and either be habitable or provide attic ventilation and have a symmetrical gable, hip, shed or curved form. :0608 Windows shall have cleaz glazing, (panes or sheets of glass) or lightly tinted glazing e.g., low emissivity, solaz, or spandrel glazing (opaque glass for concealing structural elements). Other types of mirror glazing (including tinted or opaque glass) are not permitted. .0609 Windows shall be recessed (not flush with the wall plane) to create shadow lines and to impart athree-dimensional design feature. .0610 Hinge all first floor exterior doors. Sliding glass doors aze permitted only above the first floor and on rear or interior side yazd elevations not visible from public rights-of- way or adjacent properties. .0611 Primary wall materials used on the front fagade must be repeated on the reaz and side elevations. .0612 The lower thirty percent 30 % portion of balcony rails shall be finished with a permanent, solid, building material that matches or is otherwise compatible with the building. .0612 Balconies shall provide penetrations in the building mass at least three (3) feet and create shadow and expose extended wall thickness. .070 Roof Treatments. .0701 Roofs shall be of a monochromic color and all penetrations and appurtenances shall be painted to match or be compatible with the roof color so that their visibility is minimized. DRAFT 20-19 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .0702 Rooftop mechanical equipment screens shall be solid enclosures (e.g., standing seam metal, corrugated metal, and plaster coated panels). _, __ A703 Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be mounted behind major rooftop elements such as stair or elevator penthouses, pazapets, or architectural projections so that the equipment is not visible from the adjacent public rights-of--way or adjacent property at grade level. .080 Parking Treatments. .0801 Parking structures shall be screened from view and shall include architectural detailing, facade treatment, artwork, landscaping, or similar visual features to enhance the street facade. .0802 The portions of any parking structure facing the street, excluding vehicular access areas, shall be "lined" with residential, live/work or other usable space to clad the face of the structure so that it is not visible from the adjacent street. A803 Subterranean parking structures can extend above grade up to two feet six inches (2'6") without requiring cladding treatment as required above.. .0804 Parking structures shall include asqueal-free floor treatment. .090 Service Areas. Locate and screen service aeeas and mechanical/electrical/ backflow prevention equipment to reduce their visibility from public and communal gathering areas; use methods of screening that are compatible with the project's azchitecture. .100 Landmark Architecture. Building azchitecture on key intersection corners as shown on The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan requires special treatment. This treatment shall consist of the following: .1001 Tower element that demonstrates distinctive azchitectural features on the fapade by providing both greater height and off-set from the building wall plane. .1002 Enhanced pedestrian entry on the comer defined as including at least three (3) of the following chazacteristics: .O1 Oriented on a diagonal to the comer. .02 Setback at least three (3) feet behind the building facade. .03 Two (2) story entrance height and twenty (20) foot entrance width. .04 Canopy, overhang or other azchitectural covering over the building entry. .OS Other architectural element of a size and scale easily visible from at least one block away and customized for that specific corner location. .06 Decorative landscaping, hazdscape, planters and/or fountains. .110 Building Treatment Adjacent to Streets. Consistent with the goal of creating walkable and safe neighborhoods, the ground floor of a building and the space between the building and street requires "pedestrian friendly" design treatments. DRAFT 20-20 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone . 1101 Commercial Ground Floor Treatment. When the ground floor is intended for retail or other commercial use in a vertically mixed use building, the ground floor elevation ._ exposed to the street shall provide: .O1 Primary pedestrian access directly from the adjacent public street frontage. .02 A maximum eighteen {18) inch deep azea, measured out from the face of the building, within which a commercial tenant may customize store front design. .03 A pedestrian signage azea at least twenty-four (24) inches in height integrated into the front ground floor elevation of the building. .04 An average of fourteen (14) foot floor to ceiling height on the retail ground floor. .OS Projecting signs. :06 Approximately twice the amount of window area on the ground floor compared to other floors. ,07 At least one (1) ofthe following devices shall be used to visually differentiate the retail from other levels: (a) Minimum two (2) foot setback between the ground and upper floors, up to six (6) feet setback is allowed; (b) Use of overhangs, awnings or trellis work for at least sixty percent (60%) of the frontage. .1102 Arterial Streets -Residential Ground Floor. When residential ground floor use is adjacent to an arterial street, the ground floor shall be designed to provide the following: .O1 At least one (1) residential entry into a communal lobby or courtyard per block. .02 Dwelling unit patios shall be located at least eighteen (18) inches above the sidewalk grade. .1103 Connector Streets -Residential Ground Floor. When residential ground floor use is adjacent to a Connector Street, regardless of the number of floors, the ground floor shall be designed to provide the following: .01 Communal or individual dwelling unit entries accessible from the adjacent street and/or individual dwelling unit walkway connections to the adjacent street sidewalk. .02 Residential entry stoops, patios or communal entries shall be at least eighteen (18) inches above the sidewalk grade for a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the entries .along connector streets. .120 Pedestrian Circulation. On-site pedestrian circulation shall be continuous and connect vazious on site uses and, where feasible, connect to off=site transit stops. DRAFT 20-21 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone 18.20.150 SIGNS. .010 Coordinated Program. A coordinated sign program is required and shall address the following: .0101 Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying element along the streetscape. :0102 The size, scale, and style of signs .shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the buildings which they are a part. .0103 Wall signs shall be placed between the ground floor doorways and the upper facades and shall be located at approximately the same height to create a unifying, horizontal pattern. .020 Applicability of other Regulations. The provisions in Chapter 18..44 (Signs), shall apply to projects within the PTMU Overlay Zone except as provided below: .0201 Awning signs and projecting signs aze permitted for buildings with ground floor commercial uses. .0202 Thematic elements orthree-dimensional object or non-habitable structure such as a gateway, tower, sculpture, spire and similar azchitectural features to entertain pedestrians are permitted. 18.20.160 COMPATIBLITY STANDARDS. The following standards aze intended to ensure the compatibility of uses in a mixed-use project .010 Security. Residential units shall be designed to ensure the security of residents through the provision of secured entrances and exits that aze separate from the non-residential uses and are directly accessible to parking azeas. Non-residential and residential uses shall not have common entrance hallways or common balconies. These sepazations shall be shown on the development plan and the sepazations shall be permanently maintained. .020 Restriction on Activities. Commercial uses shall be designed and operated, and hours of operation limited, so that neighboring residents are not exposed to offensive noise, especially from traffic, trash collection, routine deliveries or late night activity. No use shall produce continual loading or unloading of heavy trucks at the site between the hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. .040 Vibrations and Odors. No use, activity or process shall produce continual vibrations or noxious odors that are perceptible without instruments by the average person at the property lines of the site or within the interior of residential units on the site. .050 Lighting. Outdoor lighting associated with commercial uses shall not adversely impact surrounding residential uses, but shall provide sufficient illumination for access and security purposes. Such lighting shall not blink, flash, or oscillate. .050 Windows. Residential windows shall not directly face loading azeas and docks. To the extent windows of residential units face each other, the windows shall be offset to maximize privacy. DRAFT 20-22 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code 18.20.170 IMPLEMENTATION. Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone An approved Final Site Plan and a Development Agreement between the property owner and the City of Anaheim are required for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone in the Katella Avenue, Gene Autry and Gateway Districts except as exempt under subsection 18.20.170.020.0201 (Development Agreement Exemptions). Development within the Stadium and Arena Districts shall be subject to the requirements of the underlying PR (Public Recreation) or T (Transitional) Zones. .010 Final Site Plan Review. A Final Site Plan Application for development in the Katella, Gene Autry and Gateway Districts shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and .approval by the Planning Director as to conformance with the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Said application shall include, but not be limited to, Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscape Plans, Sign Plans and any other such information as determined by the Planning Director. The approved Final Site Plan shall be attached as an exhibit to the Development Agreement as required pursuant to subsection18.20.170.020 (Development Agreement) and submitted to Planning Commission and City Council for review at a noticed Public Hearing. .0101 Variances. A Final Site Plan which includes a request for a Variance shall have an application for said Variance processed concurrently with the Development Agreement. ..0102 Conditional Use Permit. A Final Site Plan which includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit shall have an application for said Conditional Use Permit processed concurrently with the Development Agreement. .020 Development Agreement. A Development Agreement shall be processed for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone except as exempt under subsection 18.20.170.020.0201 (Development Agreement Exemptions) per Resolution No. 82R-565 (Procedures Resolution) adopted by the City pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute. The form of the Development Agreement shall be as approved per City Council Resolution No. _ on file in the Office of the City Clerk. A Final Site Plan found to be in accordance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan shall be attached as an exhibit to said Development Agreement. .0201 Development Agreement Exemptions -Following construction and commencement of operation of a project that has been implemented pursuant to an approved Development Agreement, the following projects or improvements do not require a Development Agreement; however, plans for said projects or improvements shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval for consistency with all applicable provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan prior to the issuance of building, landscape or sign permits. .O1 Interior building alterations, modifications or improvements which do not result in an increase in the gross squaze footage of the building. .02 Minor building additions or improvements interior to or at the reaz of a building or development complex which are not visible from the public right-of--way; do not exceed 5% of the building's gross square footage or 1,000 squaze Feet, whichever is lesser; aze in substantial conformance with the building envelope; and, aze in conformance with the Design Plan and the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in this chapter. DRAFT 20-23 8-9-04 Anaheim Zoning Code Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone .03 Exterior fapade improvements which do not add to the gross square footage of a building or development complex; are not visible from the public right-of--way; do not exceed five percent (5 %) of the building's gross square footage or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is lesser; and, aze in substantial conformance with the PTMU Overlay.. Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .04 Signage, including wall signs, and on-site directional/informational signs, except as conditionally permitted, and which signs are in conformance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .OS Landscape/hardscape improvements or modifications which are not in connection with building modifications and are in conformance with the PTMU Overlay Zone and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. .06 Conditionally permitted uses that will not increase the square footage or parking demand of the existing development as determined by the Planning Director and City Engineer. .030 Environmental Review. Development Agreement Review by the Planning Commission shall include an environmental determination for the proposed project as depicted in the Final Site Plan. DRAFT 20-24 8-9-04 ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE A-TT/~CHMENT G RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION RESCIND THE SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT (SE) OVERLAY ZONE (MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00082) RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-000 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RESCIND THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO THE SE (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT) OVERLAY ZONE (RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-14) (MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00082). WHEREAS, on February 14, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2000-14 amending Resolution No. PC2000-9 in its entirety, nunc pro tunc, adopted in connection with Reclassification No. 99-0015 for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as those certain properties located in the approximately 807 acres bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north, and known as the "Anaheim Stadium Area" and further depicted in Attachment A to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, said Resolution provided for the exclusion of the above-described properties from the "CO" Commercial, Office and Professional Zone, "CL" Commercial, Limited Zone, "CH" Commercial, Heavy Zone., "ML" Limited Industrial Zone, "PR" Public Recreational Zone and "RS-A-43,000" Residential/Agricultural Zone, and to incorporate said described properties into the "LO(SE)" Commercial, Office and Professional- Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "GC(SE)" Commercial, Limited-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "CH(SE)" Commercial, Heavy-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "ML(SE): Limited Industrial-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "PRISE)" Public Recreational-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone and "RS-A- 43,000(SE)" Residential/Agricultural-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, upon reclassification, each of the above properties would be subject to the land use and development standards established by Chapter 18.50 {now Chapter 18.20) "Sports Entertainment Overlay (SE) Zone" of the Anaheim Municipal Code for the underlying Development District; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004., the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisipns The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed- use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter- CR\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and- - developmentopportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places., ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2;000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the fallowing applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the {PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the 0-H (High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Consultant, City Staff and the City Attorney's Office have prepared a proposed replacement to Chapter 18.20, entitled "Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone', designated as Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, copies of which have been provided to the Anaheim City Planning Commission, including certain corrections and omissions thereto which are set forth in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 9, 2004, attached as Attachment "A" to Planning Commission Resolution No. ;and WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone will, if adopted, amend Chapter 18.20 "Sports Entertainment Overlay (SE) Zone" of the Anaheim Municipal Code, in its entirety; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of state law, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and 1. That the adopted (SE) Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone is not consistent with the Goals and Policies and vision for The Platinum Triangle set forth in the recently adopted citywide comprehensive General Plan Update (General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419). 2. That rescinding the resolution of intent to reclassify the above-described properties to the (SE) Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone is required in conjunction with adoption of the new Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone for The Platinum Triangle to implement General Plan Goals and Policies. -2- PC2004- 3. That, by Resolution No. _, Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council amend the Zoning Code to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone (Ordinance No. 5673 pertaining to Chapter 20 of Title 16 of the Anaheim Muncipal Code) with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone. 4. That, by Resolution No. , Planning Commission has recommended that the City' Council approve Reclassification No. 2004-00130 to reclassify certain properties described in said Resolution that have finalized to the (SE) Overlay Zone to the following Zones: I(SE) (Lndustrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay) to I (PTMU) (Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone; I(SE) ((Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone; and, O-L (SE) (Office Low -Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone to be consistent with the corresponding General Plan designations for the subject properties. 5. That persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to rescind the resolution of intent to the (SE) (Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone (Resolution No. PC2000-14) {Miscellaneous Case No. 2004-00082) in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Cade Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Cade Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Ciry Council that Resolution No. PC2000-14 approving a resolution of intent to the (SE) (Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone be rescinded. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -3- PC2004- I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby - - certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, t have hereunto set my hand this day of .2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CR\PC2004- .doc -4- PC2004- ATTACHNiEP1T A -5- PC2004- Figure 1 < ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2004-00032 r ,a AMEND THE ZONING CODE TO REPLACE THE (SE) (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) ZONE (ORDINANCE NO. 5673 PERTAINING TO CHAPTER 20 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE) WITH THE (PTMU) (PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00085 APPROVE AS TO THE FORM OF THE STANDARD PLATINUM TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. ~;'w ~ MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00082 ~,~ RESCIND THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO THE (SE) (SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT OVERLAY) 'ZONE (RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-14). va..aab ° The Platinum Triangle 'eoaeoaP Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 1409a ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACHnAENT H RECOMMENDATION :RESOLUTION RESCIND THE STADIUM AREA MASTER LAND USE PLAN (MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00083) RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-- ** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT CITY COUNCIL :RESOLUTION NO. 99R-39 APPROVING THE ANAHEIM STADIUM AREA MASTER LAND USE PLAN BE RESCINDED WHEREAS, on January 29, 1999, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing and did recommend to the City Council the approval of the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan to provide for economic development and enhancement of the area surrounding and including the Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim; and that said area (known at the time as the Anaheim Stadium :Business Center) is bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way to the north; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 99R-39 approving the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan and certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 321, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 in conjunction with its adoption of Resolution No. 99R-38 approving General Plan Amendment No. 361 re-designating the Anaheim Stadium Business Center as "Business OfficelMixed Use/Industrial" and making certain amendments to the Circulation Element and to the Safety and Seismic Safety Element; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. OOSSa for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land use designations within an .approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter-modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing CR\PC2004-_ doc -1- PC2004-_ views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 20004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, .Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the O-H (High Intensity Office) and 0-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations ("Proposed Actions'); and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Proposed Actions to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the adopted Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan is not consistent with the Goals and Policies and vision for The Platinum Triangle set forth in the recently adopted citywide comprehensive General Plan Update (General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419). 2. That rescinding the resolution approving the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan is required in conjunction with adoption of a new Master Land Use Plan for The Platinum Triangle to implement General Plan Goals and Policies. 3. That persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to rescind the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use CR\PC2004- doc -2- PC2004- Plan (Miscellaneous Case No. 2004-00083) which generally encompasses the area including and surrounding the Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim; generally bounded by . the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way to the north in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004- 00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004- 00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004- 00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004- 00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330., and that the previously- certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and Ciry CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that Resolution No. 99R-39 approving the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan be rescinded. August 9, 2004. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CR\PC2004-_.doc -3- PC2004- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments to this resolution: Miscelleneous Case No. 2004-00083 -Figure (location map) CR\PC2004- .doc CR\PC2004- .doc -4- PC2004- ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ,4TTACFiNIENT I RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN (MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00084) RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN WHEREAS, on January 29, 1999, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing and did recommend to the City Council the approval of the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan to provide for economic development and enhancement of the area surrounding and including the Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim; and that said area (known at the time as the Anaheim Stadium Business Center) is bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way to the north; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 99R-39 approving the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan and certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 321, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 in conjunction with its adoption pf Resolution No. 99R-38 approving General Plan Amendment No. 361 re-designating the Anaheim Stadium Business Center as "Business OfficelMixed Use/Industrial" and making certain amendments to the Circulation Element and to the Safety and Seismic Safety Element; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; .and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City 9imits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue, and further depicted in Attachment A to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter-modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridpr from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing CR~PC2004- doc -1- PC2004- views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is " integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks,' pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), 5,000;000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (.Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the 0-H (High Intensity Office) and 0-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Proposed Actions to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the City Council has adopted its Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. No. 2004-00419 which provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update and included a redesignation of The Platinum Triangle area from Commercial Recreation and Business OfficelMixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional land uses and set forth a vision and goals and policies for the development of The Platinum Triangle. 2. That the adopted Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use :Plan is not consistent with the vision and goals and policies for The Platinum Triangle set forth in the recently adopted citywide comprehensive General Plan Update (General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419) and, that, by Resolution No. ,the Commission recommended to the City Council that Resolution No. 99R-39 approving the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Plan be rescinded. CR\PC2004- doc -2- PC2004- 3. That the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan is set forth in Attachment A to this resolution, which is incorporated herein as if set forth in its entirety, as .modified by the modifications to The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use set forth in Attachment E to the August 9, 2004 staff report to the Planning Commission. 4. That the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan provides for the implementation of the General Plan vision, goals and policies for The Platinum Triangle and will serve as a blueprint for future development and street improvements within The Platinum Triangle, including setting forth planning principles, development intensities, conceptual street, park and potential new signalized intersection locations and streetscape designs including, but not limited to, landscaping, lighting fixtures and street furniture and by identifing the existing Amtrack/Metrolink Station and the conceptual Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) location. 5. That persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to approve The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (Miscellaneous Case No. 2004-00084) which generally encompasses approximately 820 acres including and surrounding the Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim; generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way to the north in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004- 00129 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004- 00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based uppn said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously- certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure .improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H .and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. August 9, 2004. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: CR\PC2004- .doc -3- PC2004- SENIOR SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of .2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments to this resolution: Miscelleneous Case No. 2004-00084 -Figure (location map) CR\PC2004- .doc CR\PC2004- .doc -4- PC2004- ATTACHMENT A Miscellaneous Case No. 2004-00084 Figure 2 (location map) CR\PC2004-_.doc -5- PC2004- Figure 2 u MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00083 RESCIND THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANAHEIM STADIUM AREA MASTER LAND USE PLAN (RESOLUTION NO. 99R-39). pooeaeo MISGELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2004-00084 q®e®eorr APPROVE THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN. Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 7409b ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACHMENT J RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION RECLASSLFICATION NO. 2004-00127 RESOLUTION NO. PC2004- " A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00127 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided'for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area general y bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades,(set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter-modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), CR\PC2004- doc -1- PC2004- 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor -°-- area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the O-H (High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission's July 12, 2004 motion did include initiation of a petition for Reclassification No. 2004-00127 for certain real properties situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and described on the attached map labeled "Reclassification No. 2004-00127 -Property Descriptions'; and that the general location of each area is shown on the attached location map labeled 'Reclassification No. 2004-00127 -Figure 3 (location map).' WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) and 18.76 (Zoning Amendments), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, :investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, .and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That this City-initiated proposal will establish a resolution of intent to reclassify certain properties within the Platinum Triangle from the I (Industrial), C-G (General Commercial), O-L (Low Intensity Office) and PR (Public Recreation) zones to the O-H (High Intensity Once) zone. 2. That ordinances to rezone specific parcels to the O-H (High Intensity Office) zone will not be adopted until the underling property owner(s) request finalization of said zone, as conditioned herein. 3. That the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General. Plan designates subject properties for Office High. 4. That no development shall occur within The Platinum Triangle that exceeds the maximum allowable development analyzed by EIR No. 330; and, that the maximum amount of office development within that portion of The Platinum designated Office-Low and/or Office-High by the General Plan shall be no greater than 1,735,000 square feet. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 6. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. -2- PC2004- 7. That _ persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that _ correspondence was received in opposition. - - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciry. Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify the following areas to the O-H (High Intensity Office) zone: (1) An irregularly shaped area zoned C-G (General Commercial), O-L (Low Intensity Office) and 1 (Industrial) located at the .northwest corner of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, and having frontages of 640 feet on the north side of Katella Avenue and 675 feet on the west side of Lewis Street; (2) A rectangularly shaped area zoned 1(Industrial) located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, and having frontages of 910 feet on the north side of Katella Avenue and 620 feet on the east side of Lewis Street; (3) An irregularly shaped area zoned I (Industrial) located on the northeast side of Anaheim Way between Katella Avenue and Gene Autry Way, and having frontages of 1,71p feet on the south side of Katella Avenue, 1,460 feet on the northeast side of Anaheim Way and 1,100 feet on the north side of Gene Autry Way; (4) An irregularly shaped area zoned I (Industrial) located on northeast side of Anaheim Way between Gene Autry Way and a point 350 feet north of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue, and having frontages of 865 feet on the south side of Gene Autry Way, 1,490 feet on the northeast side of Anaheim Way, 180 feet on the northwest side of Stanford Court and 675 feet on the northeast side of Santa Cruz Street; (5) An irregularly shaped area zoned I (Industrial) located on the northwest side of Katella Avenue between the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the west and Howell Avenue on the east, and having frontages of 580 feet on northwest side of Katella Avenue and 710 feet on the southwest side of Howell Avenue; (6) An irregularly shaped area zoned O-L (Low Intensity Office) located on the northeast side of Howell Avenue between Sinclair Street and Katella Avenue and adjoining the State Route 57/Orange Freeway on the east, and having frontages of 400 feet on the south side of Sinclair Street, 300 feet on the northeast side of Howell Avenue and 470 feet on the north Side of Katella Avenue; and (7) An irregularly shaped area zoned I (Industrial) and O-L Low Intensity Ofrrce located on :the south side of Orangewood Avenue between a point 825 feet east of State College Boulevard and the Anaheim City Limits west of the Santa Ana River, and having a frontage of 1,830 feet on the south side of Orangewood Avenue and a maximum depth of 1,070 feet; in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00128, 2004- 00129 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council., as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004- 00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously- certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are -3- PC2004- adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental - - documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects .and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciry Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described properties from the 1(Industrial), C-G (General Commercial), O-L (Low Intensity Office) and PR (Public Recreation) zones and to incorporate said described properties into the O-H (High Intensity Office) zone upon the following condition which is hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject properties in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Gitizens of the City of Anaheim: Prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning any parcel or parcels, the following shall be submitted to the Planning Department: (i) letter from the property owner (or property owners where applicable) or the property owner's authorized agent requesting reclassification to the 0-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone, (ii) current title report or preliminary title report showing the legal vesting of title and containing a legal description of the property, (iii) map of the property (including scale and dimensions), and (iv) payment of a filing fee in an amount as specified by resolution of the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with the condition hereinabove set forth. Should said condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject properties; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion as set forth in Section 18.76.070 (Effect of City Council's Failure to Adopt Rezoning Ordinance) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -4- PC2004- I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning - --- Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments to this resolution: Reclassification No. 2004-00127 -Property Descriptions Reclassification No. 2004-00127 -Figure 3 (location map) -5- PC2004- Reclassification No. 2004-00127 Property Descriptions (to be provided) -6- PC2004- Reclassification No. 2004-00127 Figure 3 (location map) -7- PC2004- i p669amm RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00127 6 9698606 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM THE I (INDUSTRIAL), C-G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL), O-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) AND PR (PUBLIC RECREATION) ZONES TO THE 0-H (HIGH INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE. The Platinum Triangle Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 1418a ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACHIVIEVT K RECOMMENDATION RESOLU~fION RECLASSIFICATION N0;.2004-00128 ., RESOLUTION NO. PC2004- ** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00128 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a far the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter-modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), -1- PC2004- 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor - - area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications .and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the O-H (High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission's July 12, 2004 motion did include initiation of a petition for Reclassification No. 2004-00128 for certain real properties situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and described on the attached map labeled 'Reclassification No. 2004-00128 -Property Descriptions'; and that the general location of each area is shown on the attached location map labeled 'Reclassification No. 2004-00128 -Figure 4 (location map).' WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) and 18.76 (Zoning Amendments), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make Endings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That this City-initiated proposal will establish a resolution of intent to reclassify certain properties within the Platinum Triangle from the I (Industrial) zone to the O-L (Low-Intensity Office) zone. 2. That ordinances to rezone specific parcels to the O-L (Low Intensity Office) zone will not be adopted until the underling property owner(s) request finalization of said zone, as conditioned herein. 3. That the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates subject properties for Office-Low. 4. That no development shall occur within The Platinum Triangle that exceeds the maximum allowable development analyzed by EIR No. 330; and that the maximum amount of office development within that portion of The Platinum designated Office-Low and/or Office-High by the General Plan shall be no greater than 1,735,000 square feet. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 6. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject properties and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. -2- PC2004- 7. That persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that correspondence was received in opposition. -- :.__ CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify two irregularly shaped areas located (i) on the south side of the Southern Pacific Railroad and Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks between Lewis Street and State College Boulevard north of Katella Avenue, including properties on both sides of Howell Avenue, and (ii) on the east side of State College Boulevard between Howell Avenue on the north and the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the south, from the I (Industrial) zone to the 0-L (Low Intensity Office) zone (Reclassification No. 2004-00128); in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be .required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously-certifed Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the 0-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described properties from the I (Industrial) zone and to incorporate said described properties into the O-L (Low Intensity Office) zone upon the following condition which is hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject properties in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: Prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning any parcel or parcels, the following shall be submitted to the Planning Department: (i) letter from the property owner (or property owners where applicable) or the property owner's authorized agent requesting reclassification to the O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone, (ii) current title report or preliminary title report showing the legal vesting of title and containing a legal description of the property, (iii) map of the property (including scale and dimensions), and (iv) payment of a filing fee in an amount as specified by resolution of the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with the condition hereinabove set forth. Should said condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion as set forth in Section 18.76.070 (Effect of City Council's Failure to Adopt Rezoning Ordinance) of the Anaheim Municipal Cade. -3- PC2004- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of -- - August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim'Municpal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a Ciry Council resolution in the event of an appeal CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM 1 I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments to this resolution: Reclassification No. 2004-00126 -Property Descriptions Reclassification No. 2004-00128 -Figure 4 (location map) CR\PC2004- doc -4- PC2004- Reclassification No. 2004-00128 Property Descriptions (to be provided) -5- PC2004- Reclassification No. 2.004-00128 Figure 4 (location map) -6- PC2004- Figure 4 i RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00128 r ?c, RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM THE I (INDUSTRIAL) ZONE TO THE O-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE] ZONE. epaeeeae The Platinum Triangle m....e'e Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: Graphic 1418b ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATT~4CFIMIENT L RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00129 RESOLUTION NO. PC2004- ** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 2004-00129 BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the Cjty of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future developmenE of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed- use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter- modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), S,OOO,OOp square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0; and -1- PC2004- WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to--- initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triang a Mixed Use) Overlay.Zone (including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the 0-H (High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission's July 12, 2004 motion did include initiation of a petition for Reclassification No. 2004-00129 for certain real properties situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and described on the attached maps labeled 'Reclassification No. 2004-00129 -Property Descriptions'; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) and 18.76 (Zoning Amendments), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed reclassification of certain properties (which are shown on the attached location map labeled 'Reclassification No. 2004-00129 -Figure 5 (location map)') to add the PTMU "Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone to the existing base zones, is as follows: Area A - from the I "industrial" zone to the I (PTMU) "Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on various properties located (i) on the west side of State College Boulevard between the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the north and Orangewood Avenue on the south, (ii) on the north side of Orangewood Avenue between Anaheim Way and State College Boulevard, (iii) at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, (iv) at the northeast and southeast corners of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard, and (v) on both sides of Douglass Road south of Katella Avenue; Area B - from the O-L "Low Intensity Office"zone to the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on various properties located (i) on the north side of Orangewood Avenue between Anaheim Way and State College Boulevard, (ii) at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, (iii) southeast of the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, and (iv) on the south side of Katella Avenue between the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the west and the State Route 57-Orange Freeway on-ramp on the east; Area C - from the PR "Public Recreation" zone to the PR(PTMU) "Public Recreation -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on two properties: the Anaheim Stadium property bounded by Katella Avenue and the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the north, State College Boulevard on the west, Orangewood Avenue on the south, and the State Route 57-Orange Freeway and the Anaheim City Limits on the east, and the Anaheim Arena property at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass Road; -2- PC2004- Area D - from the T "Transition" zone to the T(PTMU) "Transition -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone on two properties: the northwest corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass Road, and property---- east of the Anaheim City Limits and the Santa Ana River between the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks on the north and Katella Avenue on the south; and Area E - from the C-G "General Commercial"zone to the C-G(PTMU) "General Commercial -Platinum. Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on property located on the south side of Katella Avenue between a line projected southerly from Howell Avenue on the west and the State Route 57- Orange Freeway on-ramp on the east. 2. That the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates subject properties for Mixed-Use. 3. That no development shall occur on the above listed properties that exceeds the maximum amounts analyzed by EIR No. 330 for that portion of The Platinum Triangle designated Mixed-Use by the General Plan as divided into Districts (as indicated on Figure 5 of The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan). The maximum allowable development shall be as follows: District Dwellinc Units Office Scuare Feet Commercial Scuare Feet Stadium 1, 750 1, 760, 000 1, 300, 000 Arena 425 100,000 100,000 Katella 4,250 775,000 544,300 Gene Autry 1,000 100; 000 50, 000 Gateway 1,750 530,000 50,000 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject properties and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 6. That _ persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that _ correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify various properties as follows: Area A -from the 1 "Industrial"zone to the 1 (PTMU) "Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone (properties generally located (i) on the west side of State College Boulevard between the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the north and Orangewood Avenue on the south, (ii) on the north side of Orangewood Avenue between Anaheim Way and State College Boulevard, (iii) at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, (iv) at the northeast and southeast corners of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard, and (v) on both sides of Douglass Road south of Katella Avenue), Area B -from the O-L "Low Intensity Office" zone to the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone (properties located (i) pn the north side of Orangewood Avenue between Anaheim Way and State College Boulevard, (ii) at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, (iii) southeast of the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, and (iv) on the south side of Katella Avenue between the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the west and the State Route 57- Orange Freeway on-ramp on the east), Area C -from the PR "Public Recreation"zone to the PR(PTMU) "Public Recreation -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone on two properties (the Anaheim Stadium property bounded by Katella Avenue and the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks on the north, State College Boulevard on the west, Orangewood Avenue on the south, and the State Route 57-Orange Freeway and the Anaheim City Limits on the east, and the Anaheim Arena property at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass Road), Area t) -from the T "Transition"zone to the T(PTMU) "Transition -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on two properties (the northwest corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass -3- PC2004- Rcad, and property east of the Anaheim City Limits and the Santa Ana River between the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks on the north and Katella Avenue on the south), Area E -from the C-G "General Commercial"•-- zone to the C-G(PTMU) `General Commercial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone (property located on the south side of Katella Avenue between a line projected southerly from Howell Avenue on the west and the State Route 57-Orange Freeway on-ramp on the east) (Reclassification 2004-00129); in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004- 00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128 and 2004-00130; and did recommend, by motion, that the Ciry Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004- 00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330, and that the previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the 0-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies far those projects shall be prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to reclassify the above-described properties., unconditionally, as follows: (a) To exclude Area A from the 1 "Industrial"zone and to incorporate said"properties into the 1(PTMU) "Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Oveday"zone; (b) To exclude Area 8 from the O-L "Low intensity Office"zone and to incorporate said properties into the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay' zone; (c) To exclude Area C from the PR "Public Recreation"zone and to incorporate said properties into the PR(PTMU) "Public Recreation -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone; (d) To exclude Area D from the T "Transition"zone and to incorporate said properties into the T(PTMU) "Transition -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone; and (e) To exclude Area E from the C-G "General Commercial" zone and to incorporate said property into the C-G(PTMU) "General Commercial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject properties; any such rezoning shall.require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion as set forth in Section 18.76.070 (Effect of City Council's Failure to Adopt Rezoning Ordinance) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to he appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council resolution in the event of an appeal. -4- PC2004- CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments to this resolution: Reclassification No. 2004-00129 -Property Descriptions Reclassification No. 2004-00129 -Figure 5 (location map) CR\PC2004- .doc -5- PC2004- Reclassification No. 2004-00129 Property ®escriptions (to be provided) -6- PC2004- Reclassification IVo. 2004-00129 Figure 5 (location reap) -7- PC2004- Figure 5 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00129 p°oo°°o° RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES FROM: The Platinum Triangle (A) I (INDUSTRIAL) ZONE TO I (PTMU) (INDUSTRIAL - ~"°0°` ~`''~°~'~ PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. Date: August 9, 2004 (B) 0-L (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE) ZONE TO O-L (PTMU) Scale: Graphic (LOW INTENSITY OFFICE -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY)ZONE. (C) PR (PUBLIC RECREATION) ZONE TO PR (PTMU) (PUBLIC RECREATION -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. (D) T (TRANSITIONAL) ZONE TOT (PTMU) (TRANSITIONAL - PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. ~ (E) C-G (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE TO C-G (PTMU) (GENERAL 'r COMMERCIAL -PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE OVERLAY) ZONE. 1419 ITEM 5 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ATTACFBMENT M RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00130 RESOLUTION NO. PC2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 2004-00130 BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023), Amendment No. 2 to the .Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions; and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an approximately 620-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to "The Platinum Triangle") from Commercial Recreation and Business OfficelMixed Usellndustrial to Mixed Use, Office High, Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except for approximately 15 acres adjacent to the east side of the Santa Ana {I-5) Freeway, :north of Katella Avenue, and further depicted in Attachment A to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades (set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element); and WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle include providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed- use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter- modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Ana (I-5) and Orange (SR-57) Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River; developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths, gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office development along the highly visible periphery of the area to provide a quality employment center; developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops and identify and pursue opportunities for open space areas khat serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents and employees; WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units (at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units per acre), 5,000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial uses, industrial 1- PC2004- development at a maximum floor area ration of 0.50 and institutional development at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone (.including rescinding Resolution No. PC2000-14, which approved the (SE) Overlay Zone); Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (including rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the 0-H {High Intensity Office) and O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions"); and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission's July 12, 2004 motion did include initiation of a petition for Reclassification No. 2004-00130 for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows AREA A PARCEL A OF THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT NO. 123, AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 AND 2 OF SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JANUARY 7, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 85-004456, OFFICIAL RECORDS, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AREA B PARCEL 1: LOT 4 AND THE EAST 46 FEET OF LOT 5 OF THE TRAVIS TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGE 120 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOT 4 THAT PORTION, LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE 40 FOOT COUNTY ROAD SECOND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM B.R. DOUGLASS AND OTHERS TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1926 IN BOOK 682, PAGE 109 OF DEEDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE 833 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1965 IN BOOK 7646, PAGE 943 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586[Y), A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972 IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT Y OF THE VAN DE GRAAF TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 440 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT BEING 1443.6 FEET EAST OF THE POINT WHERE THE SOUTH LINE OF -2- PC2004- SAID LOT Y PRODUCED WEST, INTERSECTS THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA; THENCE NORTH 1012.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE `" NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 455.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11904.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT Y; THENCE WEST -- 447.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 20, 1928 IN BOOK 169, PAGE 417 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH SAID POINT OF BEGINNING IS DISTANT SOUTH, MEASURED ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE 81 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND RUNNING THENCE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 25 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EAST 20 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH 25 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES WEST 20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE 833 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972 IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. AREA C PARCELS 1 THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE OF :PARCEL MAP NO. 97-187, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 304, PAGES 31 TO 36 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) and 18.76 (Zoning Amendments), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed reclassification of certain properties, including removing the (SE) Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone, is as follows: Area A - from the 1(SE) "Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay" zone to the 1(PTMU) "Industrial - Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on an approximately 3.7-acre rectangularly shaped property having a frontage of 287 feet on the west side of State College Boulevard and a depth of 556 feet, being located 335 feet north of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue, and further described as 2045 South State College Boulevard; Area B - from the 1(SE) "Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone to the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone on an approximately 8.7-acre triangularly -3- PC2004- shaped parcel located at the southwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and Douglass Road and adjoining the State Route 57/Orange Freeway on the west, having a frontage of 1,474 feet on the west side of Douglass Road and a maximum depth of 513 feet, and further described as 1501- ' 1551 South Douglass Road; and Area C - from the O-L (SE) "Low Intensity Office-Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone to the O-L "Low Intensity Office"zone pn an approximately 24.5-acre irregularly shaped parcel having a frontage of 1,120 feet on the east side of Douglass Road and a maximum depth of 1130 feet, and being located 1,081 feet north of the centerline of Katella Avenue. 2. That the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the property in Area A for Mixed-Use, and the properties in Areas B and C for Office-Low. 3. That no development shall occur on the above-described properties that exceeds the maximum amounts analyzed by Environmental Impact Report No. 330, and further described below: (a) Area A is within the Gateway District of The Platinum Triangle as indicated on Figure 5 of The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The maximum allowable development for this district shall be no greater than five hundred thirty thousand {530,000) square feet of office uses; fifty thousand (50,000) square feet of commercial uses; and one thousand seven hundred fifty (1,750) dwelling units. (b) Areas 8 and C are designated Office Low by the General Plan. The maximum allowable office development within The Platinum Triangle in that portion of The Platinum Triangle designated Office-Low and/or Office-High by the General Plan shall be no greater than one million seven hundred thirty five thousand (1,735,000) square feet. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject properties and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 6. That persons indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify various properties as follows: Area A -from the I (SE) "Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone to the 1(PTMU) "Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone on an approximately 3.7-acre rectangularly shaped property having a frontage of 287 feet on the west side of State College Boulevard and a depth of 556 feet, being located 335 feet north of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue, and further described as 2045 South State College Boulevard, Area B - from the 1(SE) "Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone to the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office - Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay" zone on an approximately 8.7-acre triangularly shaped parcel located at the southwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and Douglass Road and adjoining the State Route 57/Orange Freeway on the west, having a frontage of 1,474 feet on the west side of Douglass Road and a maximum depth of 513 feet, and further described as 1501-1551 South Douglass Road; .and Area C -from the O- L(SE) "Low Intensity Office -Sports Entertainment Overlay" zone to the O-L "Low Intensity Office" zone on an approximately 24.5-acre irregularly shaped parcel having a frontage of 1,120 feet on the east side of Douglass Road and a maximum depth of 1,130 feet, and being located 1,081 feet north of the centerline of Katella Avenue (Reclassification No. 2004-00130) in conjunction with the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00063, 2004-00084 and 2004- 00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128 and 2004-00129; and did recommend, by motion, that the City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions, based upon its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00032, -4- PC2004- Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085 and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127., 2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130) and analysis whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which was not previously examined in FEIR No: `°° 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received. at the public hearing, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposal, no new mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, and that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330,"and that the previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover, as individual development projects and infrastructure improvements are proposed to implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H and O-L Zones, Initial Studies for those projects shall be ,prepared in compliance with CEQA requirements to determine whether additional environmental documentation will need to be prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to reclassify the above-described properties, unconditionally, as follows; (a) To exclude Area A from the 1(SE) "Industrial -Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone and to incorporate said property into the 1(PTMU) "Industrial -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay"zone; (b) To exclude Area B from the 1(SE) "Industrial-Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone and to incorporate said property into the O-L(PTMU) "Low Intensity Office -Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay° zone: and (c) To exclude Area C from the O-L(SE) "Low Intensity Office- Sports Entertainment Overlay"zone and to incorporate said property into the O-L "Low Intensity Office"zone. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion as set forth in Section 18.76.070 (Effect of City Council's Failure to Adopt Rezoning Ordinance) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -6- PC2004- I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby,.., , ._. certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CR\PC2004- .doc -&- PC2004- ITEM N0. 6 1`~"- MPy CN~~ RCL 73-74.37 RCL 67-fib-13 RCL 67-66-12 CUP 365t KAISER PERMANENTS EMPLOYEE PARKING RS-2(SC~ RCL 67-GB-13 f8 RCL 67-6b-t2 1 DU EACH ASTORIA CIR CUP 1378 C-G(SC) RCL 69-70-44 RCL 67-68-13 RCL 67-68-12 CUP 3599 ~ CUP 4132 ~ CUP 2459 VAR 2548 S ~ KAISER PERMANENTS HOSPITAL ~mG Nw ~G \~~ RCL 71-72-16 P~~ 119' RM-3(SC) RCL 77-76-31 VAR 2962 17 DU ~ ~ ~~ = v Q RS-2(SC) v i ¢ (p RCL 67-68-13 (8) N W Q RCL 67-68-12 di ~ = 1 DU EACH ~ o ~ i i PqR[~~ E CtR RS-2(SC) RCL 67-fib-13 (B) RCL 67-fib-12 1 DU EACH 1 DU ~\ J~~OP~, ty~m~ ~~ VPR 92O ~m N~ aP ~~ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE (SC) (SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZONE Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242 Subject Property TRACKING NO. CUP2004-04871 Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: LAKEVIEW PLAZA INVESTMENT COMPANY Q.S. No. 167 REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING WELLNESS SPA AND MASSAGE FACILITY AND TO MOpIFY A CONDITION OF APPROVAL PERTAINING TO A TIME LIMITATION. 430 North Lakeview Avenue - D t43o ~ ~~~ ~ ' ~ °. , ~-~"`"~ ~ , <~ \ y ,;, rte""` [ ,..~ fi'r' { 0. y' ~ "'.:'a~'~°.^ ?;~ k~ 'r ~' 3"'. .ry T *Yp K_ ~T~ ~ ~,4 r ~' n. ~ $ ?' v - -. ¢~ ~~ ~ e'~N ~f vA ~''rv. ~~ ~^ <W ~ a ~ ~ ~ i ~_ ~~ : ITEM N0. 6 ~,p ~, :.r Eii' `! (DRAFT] RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-' A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. PC2001-102 ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04242 (430A, 4308, 432 and 434 NORTH LAKEVIEW AVENUE) WHEREAS, on August 14, 2000, The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2000-94 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242, to establish conformity with existing Zoning Code land use requirements for an existing nonconforming commercial retail center and liquor store on property located at 404 to 452 North Lakeview Avenue, and to permit a massage facility at 430 North Lakeview Avenue in the same center; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2001, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did, by Resolution No. PC2001-102, reinstate Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242 for a period of five (5) years, to expire July 3D, 2006. WHEREAS, Resolution No. PC2001-102, adopted in connection with the subject use permit reinstatement includes the following conditions of approval: "1. That the massage facility portion of this conditional use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of this resolution, on July 30, 2006. 31. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the Petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, and as conditioned herein:' WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested to amend said conditions of approval and amend exhibits to expand an existing wellness spa and massage facility and to modify a condition of approval pertaining to time limitation. WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a request for a modification/amendment to the subject Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 110, PAGES 48 AND 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60.190, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in .its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed expansion is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.60.190.030 and 18.60.190.040. 2. That the proposed expansion will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; Cr\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- (TRACKING NO. CUP2004-04871) 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the expansion is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to health and safety; ""° 4. That the traffic generated by the proposed expansion will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed. if any. will nor be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That **' indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director or her authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities), as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement tc prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby amend Resolution No. PC2001-102, adopted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 2000- 04242, as amended by Resolution No. PC2004--**, to amend said conditions of approval and amend exhibits to expand an existing wellness spa and massage facility and to modify a condition of approval pertaining to time limitation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the existing commercial retail center and liquor store at 404 to 452 North Lakeview Avenue, which were established as conforming uses by the original approval of this conditional use permit, are not subject to the time limitation; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby amend, in their entirety, the conditions of approval of Resolution No. PC2001-102, as amended, to read as follows: Massage Facility 1. That the massage facility portion of this conditional use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of this resolution, on August 9, 2009. 2. That, as stipulated to by the petitioner, the hours of operation shall be limited to: Monday through Friday: 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Sunday: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. 3. That any activity described under Code Section 18.54 for Sex-Oriented-Business shall not be permitted on the premises. 4. That this business, including the conduct of all its employees, shall be operated in full compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 4.29 pertaining to Massage Establishments. 5. That all records of treatment shall be maintained on the premises for one (1) year and shall be made available for inspection by any authorized City official during regular business hours. 6. That this business shall be subject to unscheduled inspections by authorized City of Anaheim personnel in order to observe and enforce compliance with all applicable Code requirements. -2- PC2004- That should a security system be installed, a security alarm system and alarm permit application shall be obtained from the Anaheim Police Department, Community Services Division. 8. That portable A-frame signs are not permitted by the Municipal Code and shall not be permitted as an advertising device for this business. Liquor Store with sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption That no window signs shall be permitted at any time, in order to maintain unobstructed visibility of the store interior from the outside. 10. That no video, electronic or other amusement devices or games shall be permitted anywhere on subject property. 11. That no advertising of alcdhclic beverages shall be located, placed or attached to any location outside the building; and that no audio advertising, either interior or exterior shall be permitted. 12. That no alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on the premises. 13. That no display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside the building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. 14. That no person under twenty one (21) years of age shall sell or be permitted to sell any alcoholic beverages. 15. That beer shall not be sold in packages containing less than a six (6) pack; and that wine coolers shall not be sold in packages containing less than a four (4) pack. 16. That no fast-food service shall be permitted in the liquor store. Commercial Retail Center 17. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for storage or other outdoor use 18. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, .and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. 19. That any tree or other landscaping planted on-site shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dies. 20. That roof-mounted balloons or other inflated devices shall not be permitted. 21. That all trash generated from this commercial retail center shall be properly contained in trash bins contained within approved trash enclosures. The number of bins shall be adequate and the trash pick- up shall be as frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of refuse from the property. The Code Enforcement Division of the Planning Department shall determine the need for additional bins or additional pick-up. All costs for increasing the number of bins or frequency of pick-up shall be paid for by the business owner. 22. That the parking lot serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Said lighting shall be directed, positioned and shielded in such a manner so as not to unreasonably illuminate the window areas of adjacent properties, and that said lighting information shall be specified on plans submitted for approval by the Community Services Division of the Police Department and the Zoning Division of the Planning Department. -3- PC2004- 23. That no vending machines which are visible to the public right-of-way shall be permitted on the property. 24. That the required trees adjacent to the public rights-of-way shall not be unnecessarily pruned in order to increase visibility of the commercial retail center. 25. That any existing or proposed roof-mounted equipment shall be subject to the requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Section Nos. 18.18.090.0202 pertaining to the C-G(SC) (Commercial, Limited -Scenic Corridor Overlay)Zone. If proposed, such information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Zoning and Building Division approval. 26. That the number of tenant spaces shall be limited to fourteen (14) units, as specified on the exhibits submitted by the petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. 27. That signage for subject facility shall be limited to all legal existing signage as of the date of this resolution. Any additional signs shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission as a "Reports and Recommendations" item. 28. That the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the premises free of litter at all times. 29. That all public telephones (existing or proposed) shall be located inside a building. 30. That no outdoor storage, display or sale of merchandise or fixtures shall be permitted. 31. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Revision 1 of Exhibit No. 1 and Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3, and as conditioned herein. 32. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Cpde and any other applicable City, State .and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60.130, "Zoning Provisions -General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an .appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -4- PC2004- I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission., do hereby "" " certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day o; 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -5- PC2004- ATTACHI~NT - ITNM N0. 6 City of Anaheim POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE: July 27, 2004 TO: John Ramirez Planning Department FROM: Mike Lozeau Vice Detail Sergeant SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 2004-04871 LOCATION: The Bodycentre 430 N. Lakeview Avenue Anaheim, CA 92804 The Police Department has received an I.D.C. Route Sheet for Conditional Use Permit 2004-04871. The applicant is requesting to permit an expansion of an existing wellness spa with massage. The location is within Reporting District 1337, which has a Crime Rate of 68 percent below average. The Reporting District to the North is 1237 and has a crime rate of 79 percent below average. The Reporting District to the South is 1437 and has a crime rate of 90 percent below average. The Reporting District to the West is 1436 and has a crime rate of 49 percent below average. The Reporting District to the East is 1338 and has a crime rate of 86 percent below average. From July 2003 to July 2004 this location has had no calls for service. The Anaheim Police Department does not oppose the expansion to the facility; however, we would be opposed to the applicants deletion of a time limitation. We would like to request a 5 year time limit for the CUP. The business has remained in good standing. However, due to the type of business, we feel it is important to have some kind of a time limitation remain. Please contact me at extension 1451 if you require further information. f:\home\mmirwin\2004-04871 The Bodycentre.doc Page 1 of I ATTACHMENT - ITEM N0. 6 John Ramirez From: Don Yourstone Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:07 PM To: John Ramirez Subject: Body Center, 430 N. Lakeview Ave. On July 27, 2004, 1 conducted an inspection at the Body Center Massage Facility located at 430 N. Lakeview Ave. During my inspection I found that the business was operating within the conditions of Conditional Use Permit # 2000-04242. No active Code Enforcement investigations. 7/27/2004 ATTACHMENT -ITEM N0. t5 RESOLUTION NO. PC2001-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNLNG COMMISSION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-94, AS AMENDED, ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04242, TO REINSTATE AND APPROVE THE MASSAGE FACILITY FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE (5) YEARS TO EXPIRE JULY 30, 2006 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2000, The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2000-94 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242, to establish conformity with existing Zoning Code land use requirements for an existing nonconforming commercial retail center and liquor store on property located at 404 to 452 North Lakeview Avenue, and to permit a massage facility at 430 North Lakeview Avenue in the same center; and WHEREAS, Condition No. 1 of said-resolution specifies: "That this conditional use permit as it pertains to the proposed massage facility shall expire one (1) year from the date of this resolution, on August 14, 2001." WHEREAS, on November 6, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2000-119, to amend the aforementioned Resolution No. PC2000-94, nunc pro tunc, to correct Condition No. 20 regarding termination of previously-approved conditional use permits which were no longer being utilized; and WHEREAS, this property is developed with a commercial retail center inpluding a massage facility (Body Centre) in the CL(SC) (Commercial, Limited -Scenic Corridor Overlay) zone; and that the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the property for General Commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, property owner has submitted a request for modification of Condition No. 1 of Resolution No. PC2000-94, as amended, pertaining to the 1-year time limitation for the massage facility to reinstate said business and to delete the time limitation; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 30, 2001 at 1:30 p.m., nptice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That reinstatement of the massage facility (which will expire August 14, 2001) by the modification or deletion of the condition of approval pertaining to the one year a time limitation to retain the existing massage facility in an existing commercial retail center is permitted under authority of Code Section No. 16.03.093. 2. That the use, as reinstated and amended, is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code. 3. That the conditionally permitted use has been exercised in substantially the same manner as originally approved by the Commission. 4. That the massage facility is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the particular area and surrounding land uses, nor to the public peace, health and safety and general welfare. Tracking CUP 2001-04395 CR5144PK:doc -1- PC2001-102 5. That the massage facility, as proposed to be reinstated, will not adversely affect the adjoining land use .and the growth and development of the area in which it is located; and that the Code Enforcement Division has indicated that no Code violations or complaints have been received regarding this massage business and that it has been operating in compliance with the conditions of approval as originally adopted. 6. That the size and shape of the site for the use, as proposed to be reinstated, is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. 7. That the traffic generated by the use., as proposed to be reinstated, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 8. That the reinstating the massage facility, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 9. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that no correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director's authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State of California Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby amend Resolution No. PC94-2000 adopted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-04242, as amended by Resolution No. PC2000-119, to reinstate and approve the massage facility portion of said conditional use permit for another five (5) years to expire on July 30, 2006; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that existing commercial retail center and liquor store at 404 to 452 North Lakeview Avenue, which were established as conforming uses by the original approval of this conditional use permit, are not subject to the 5-year time limitation; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby amend, in their entirety, the conditions of approval of Resolution No. PC2000-94, as amended, to read as follows: Massage Facility 1. That the massage facility portion of this conditional use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of this resolution, on July 30, 2006. 2. That, as stipulated to by the petitioner, the hours of operation shall be limited to: Monday through Friday: 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m, Sunday: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. 3. That any activity described under Code Section 18.89 for Sex-Oriented-Business shall not be permitted on the premises. 4. That this business, .including the conduct of all its employees, shall be operated in full compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 4.29 pertaining to Massage Establishments. 5. That all records of treatment shall be maintained on the premises for one (1 j year and shall be made available for inspection by any authorized City official during regular business hours. -2- PC2001-102 6. That this business shall be subject to unscheduled inspections by authorized City of Anaheim personnel in order to observe and enforce compliance with all applicable Code requirements. 7. That should a security system be installed, a security alarm system and alarm permit application shall be obtained from the Anaheim Police Department, Community Services Division. 8. That portable A-frame signs are not permitted by the Municipal Code and shall not be permitted as an advertising device for this business. Liquor Store with sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption 9. That no window signs shall be permitted at any time, in order to maintain unobstructed visibility of the store interior from the outside. 10. That no video, electronic or other amusement devices or games shall be permitted anywhere on subject property. 11. That no advertising of alcoholic beverages shall be located, placed or attached to any location outside the building; and that no audio advertising, either interior or exterior shall be permitted. 12. That no alcoholic beverages shall be consumed on the premises. 13. That no display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside the building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. 14. That no person under twenty one (21) years of age shall sell or be permitted to sell any alcoholic beverages. 15. That beer shall not 6e sold in packages containing less than a six (6) pack; and that wine coolers shall not be sold in packages containing less than a four (4) pack. 16. That no fast-food service shall be permitted in the liquor store. Commercial Retail Center 17. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for storage or other outdoor use. 18. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. 19. That any tree or other landscaping planted on-site shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed., damaged, diseased and/or dies. 20. That roof-mounted balloons or other inflated devices shall not be permitted. 21. That all trash generated from this commercial retail center shall be properly contained in trash bins contained within approved trash enclosures. The number of bins shall be adequate and the trash pick-up shall be as frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of refuse from the property. The Code Enforcement Division of the Planning Department shall determine the need for additional bins or additional pick-up. All costs for increasing the number of bins or frequency of pick-up shall be paid for by the business owner. -3- PC2001-102 22. That the parking lot serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Said lighting shall be directed, positioned and shielded in such a manner so as not,to,_ unreasonably illuminate the window areas of adjacent properties, and that said lighting information shall be specified on plans submitted for approval by the Community Services Division of the Police Department and the Zoning Division of the Planning Department. ' 23. That no vending machines which are visible to the public right-of-way shall be permitted on the property. 24. That the required trees adjacent to the public rights-of-way shall not be unnecessarily pruned in order to increase visibility of the commercial retail center. 25. That any existing or proposed roof-mounted equipment shall be subject to the requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Section Nos. 18.44.030.120 and 18.84.062.032 pertaining to the CL(SC) (Commercial, Limited -Scenic Corridor Overlay)Zone. If proposed, such information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Zoning and Building Division approval. 26. That the number of tenant spaces shall be limited to fourteen (14) units, as Specified on the exhibits submitted by the petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. 27. That signage for subject facility shall be limited to all legal existing signage as of the date of this resolution. Any additional signs shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission as a "Reports and Recommendations" item. 28. That the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the premises free of litter at all times. 29. That all public telephones (existing or proposed) shall be located inside a building. 3D. That no outdoor storage, display or sale of merchandise or fixtures shall be permitted. 31. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, and as conditioned herein. 32. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. July 30, 2001. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of (Original signed by J. Vanderbilt) CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: (Original signed 6y Eleanor Fernandzs) SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4- PC2001-102 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Fernandes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on July 30, 2001, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, EASTMAN, KOOS, VANDERBILT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2001. (Original signed by Eleanor Fernandes) SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -5- PC2001-102 ITEM M0. 7 :H F } U D NQ J W ~~ Q ~ 2 NQ w ~7 GLEN HOLLY DR d RS-2 1'DU EACH W U Q O i RtSTHURANI C-G VAR 1207 RCL 57-58-03.ROBIN HOOD CUP 2712 MOTEL r- ' ~ c.c RCL 56-5759 O CUP 907 0 ' VAR 3026 5 _ Q VAR 1200 ~i MOTEL6 -~ } Q 2 GG RCL 5-0-57-59 GG CUP 1243 RCL 56.57.59 _ SMALL SHOPS SMALL SHOPS ,,,~ WESTANAHE/M 1 BALL ROAD I COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS f® 418'-~ ~ ~~ ( L RCL 5&&59.109 ~ RCL 62~-73 CUP 2832 L CUP 1964 BEACH-BALL SHOPPING CENT RCLS2-8326 I C-G RCL 92-93-09 CUP 763 RCL 5859-09 RCL 68-69.11 VAR 1832 CUP 2004-04857 CUP 2003-04815 MOBILE VAR2685 CUP 3978 HOME (6657413) GUP 3608 PARK 20U cUP 51 CUP 2625 VAR 2001 EIR 312 (RCL 80.81-21) (CUP 2164) PICK YOUR PART ANAHEIM CITY LIMITS STANTON CITY UMITS 9 DU GG RCL 71-7223 (' CUP 2]57 _..Gc RCL 71.72-23 VAR 67 CUP 3179 TRAVEL CUP 2494 MOTET CUP 1382 RESTAURANT C-G I RCL fig-70-11 F CUP 2630 LI 5,5.8 FI FOODMART C~ T-CUP Z00}Di00< RCL 64455-95 cuan96 CUP 2776 0 vnei eie]s REST. ~ T T GG Q flCL 200100096 > flcLet-6x14 T-cuvzoo}aafioz Cam' T-cuP zoo}64c64 R RCL 64455-95 euP ZZe9 6465-11 ~ vAa 1014 s CUP 1363 O ucuoa sroae m C-G (MHP) Z RCL 82.83-28 („~ RCL 56-57-44 Q MOBILE HOME PARK W m C-G RCL 6657-04 VAR 2211 S VAR 891 5 HOBBY CITY 4 Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04857 Requested By: JOHN LEE r _.: Subject Property Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Q.S. No. 11 REQUEST TO PERMIT A CHURCH WITHIN TWO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WITH WAIVERS OF: (A) MINIMUM SETBACK FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONE BOUNDARY (B) MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 3026 West Ball Road taze(zoo4-e-a) ITEM NO. 7 Use Square Code Parking;Requirement Parking Feet ) .Spaces Re wired '. Chapel (assembly) 480 29 spaces per 1,000 square feet 13.9 Building 8 of assembly area or 0.333 space er fixed seatwhichever is rester Caretakers Uni[ 1,547'. 4"parking spaces 4 Buildin A Pastor's Office 102 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of 0.4 Buildin (B ross floor area Restrooms for Buildih B 159 <'N/A N/A Gars a for Buildin B 612 fN/A N/A Kitchen 196 .02 pace/maximum capacity of 1 Buildin !A kitchen area r Accessory Church Uses (lobby j 1,151: N/A N/A areas antl bible rooms TOTAL 'i 4,247 + 19 + requirement. RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-* A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04857 BE DENIED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit for certain :real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 71, PAGES 23 TO 24, FILED AUGUST 6, 1975, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing .having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: the following: That the petitioner proposes to permit a church within two existing residences with waivers of (a) SECTION NO. 18.04.040.040 Minimum setback for institutional uses abutting a residential zone boundary (15 foot wide setback required; 6 feet existing adjacent to the building and 6 feet proposed adjacent to the parking area) (b) SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces (DELETED) 2. That waiver (a) is hereby denied on the basis that permitting a 6-foot setback adjacent to the residential condominiums to the west that have their outdoor patio areas facing the west property Line would be negatively impacted due to additional traffic, lighting and noise impacts from the proposed church and the 6-foot landscape setback does not provide an adequate buffer for these impacts. 3. That the proposed church within two existing residences is hereby denied because the proposed church operation would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the local community; and that the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding area and character of the local residential neighborhood to the west and the commercial properties to the north and east. 4. That although the size and shape of the subject property may be able to accommodate the existing two residences, the intensification of use from single family to a church use would intensify the site beyond the its capacity; and, that it is reasonable to anticipate that full development and growth of the proposed use would result in more vehicles than the existing property may be able to accommodate; .and that full development' of the proposed use would result in an over-intensification of the subject property and would negatively impact adjacent and surrounding properties. C r\PC2004-0 -1- P C2004- 5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health and safety of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use may impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 7. That "* indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Gommission has reviewed the proposal to permit a church within two existing residences with waivers of maximum structural setback and minimum number of parking spaces (deleted); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, on the basis of the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Gommission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- PG2004- ATTACHMENT - ITEM N0. 7 SECTION 4 PETITIONER'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE/CODE WAVER (NOT REQUIREnD~FOR PARKING WA~VrER) iZEQUBST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTION: t`6 ~~~• ~~ -" ~ ~ , (A sep~r e st temd ent is r~quired for each Code waiver) PERTAINING TO: ~-~~t~- ~-F3t~ i ~`G~'T't ~~~-k~ v~ S.-L5 Sections 18.03.040.030 and 1.8.12.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code require that before any variance or Code waiver maybe granted by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the following shall be shown: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. In order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission to arrive at a decision, please answer each of the following questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, fully and as completely as possible. If you need additional space, you may attach additional pages. 1. Are there special circumstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings? _ Yes ~No. If your answer is "Yes," describe the special circumstances: 2. Are the special circumstances that appl to the property different from other properties in the vicinity which aze in the same zone as your property? _ Yes ~ No If your answer is "yes," describe how the property is different: Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently enjoyed by neighboring properties located within the same zone? Yes~No If your answer if "yes," describe the special circumstances: 4. Were the special circumstances created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or previous property owners)? _ Yes No EXPLAIN The sole purpose of any variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no variance or Code waiver shall be approved which would have the effect of granting a special privilege not shazed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which is not otherwise expressly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property. Use variances are not permitted. ~~- ~- ~-~ Signature o roperty Owner or Authorized Agent Date DECEMBER 12, 2000 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNARIANCE NO. SUP ~0. 2004 - fl 4 8 5 7 ITEM N1J. 8 1u C-G ER RCL 77-78-23 -CUP 2003-047 CUP 1999 SHOPPING CENTER ~AGAN RM-2 (ECCj - RCL 2 001-000 63 RCL 96.99-11 RCL 62.63-2H '-CUP 2003-0477Q_ CUP 2003-04681 CUP 3429 CUP 2053 CUP 307 VAR 4041 VACANT II I I- RM-2 (BCC) RCL 2003-00095 - RCL 2003-00093 _ RCL 98-99-11 - RCL 62-63-26 T-CUP 2003-04776 _ CUP 2003-04681 CUP 3429 CUP 307 - - VAR 4041 FURNITURE STORE- CANOPY LN w z a J a RS-2 4 1 pU EACH J TRANSIT AVENUE ~ x w U- Z NQ ~ ~W O ~~ U ~- MALL AVE T T-CUP 2004-04872 CUP 2671 VAR 2277 (CUP 223) PRIVATE SCHOOL --- T RCL 71'-72-02 (1) RCL 71-72-04 (Res of Intent to CL) 264 DU APARTMENTS - RM-4 N APARTMENTS ANAHEIM CITY LIMITS _ _ _ L ~ .~ . Y-860 ;to fhe centerline ~® 454'----~T ORANGE COUNTY LIMITS of G116erf Street BROADWAY •- F J N ~ _ ~ > U_ W m Z W Z ~ fn W ~ O W U K D! Conditional Use Permit No. 2871 Subject Property TRACKING NO. CUP2p04-04872 Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: CORNELIA S. CONNELLY O:S. No. 33 REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW GYMNASIUM IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION WITH WAIVER OF MAXIMUM STRUCTURAL HEIGHT ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONE BOUNDARY. 2323 West Broadway -Cornelia Connelly High School 1431 TTF.M Nn_ R CNPA 916 288 6008 e Arc Oita cture En9in Bering ~ Piann in9 July 27, 2004 Mr. John Ramirez City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Blvd. Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Cornelia Connelly High School Gymnasium 2323 West Broadway Pre-File No. 2004-00043 Dear Mt. Ramirez: 07128J04 12:26pm P. 001 ATTACHMENT - ITEM N0. 8 The above referenced project is currently scheduled for the August 9th Planning Commission hearing. We respectfully request that this agenda item be continued to the next hearing on August 23'~ in order for the design team to adequately prepare the Water Quality Management Plan required by the Development Services Division. The other items generated by the interdepartmental committee meeting, including exterior lighting and material and color call-outs have already been addressed. New plans depicting these revisions will be forwarded early next week. We appreciate your consideration on this project. If there is anything that HGA can do to help with the approval process, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, ®®tel, Green and Abra6so®, Inc. --°'1 ,r Ron So""rens~oJn Project Manager CC: Scot Berlinski, PDC Rannml 1, Grccu and Auro l:n nisn n, Inc, 1613 Sanla Clara Drive Roseville, Cali to rnia OSA 95661 Tnln.. 1. ..nn OlG ]II] [l/1 I1 C.. ........In OlL lpq 'I 'lip ITEM N0. 9 ~ I I I I¢ I' I l l ~ . APOLLO AVE -® RCL: RS-2 ._ ___ i oL R5-2 1 DU EACH 1 DU EACH BRANDEAVE RS-2 VACAN T RS-2 ~ ~ 1 DU EACH LANG 1 DU EACH vARZfiis DAMONAVE 0 o x 1 DU EACH ~ q+¢ T m w ~ ' RCL 2064-00126 W Q ~ ~ ~ . Q ~ VAR 2004-04fi19 LL TPM 2ooa-137 ~ RS-2 j EDITHIA AVE ~ 1 DU ¢ 1 DU.EACH ¢ o = N ~ ' ~ ~ ¢ a VAR 2004 RS-2 i DU EACH U . ~ ~ `, m ~ ~ ~ vAR c ~ N m F rc ~ o ~ RS 2 ~~ m ~ Uaa ~ ~ m 8a DU EACH RCL 53-54.18 1 DU EACH ~ t U EACH 1 DU EACH K VAR 1228 j 70 ~ ~ CRONE AVENUE ' 38 -mot ~ ® RS-2 t D U EA CH Q RS-2 DU EACH N ® RS-2 jggR ~ 1 DU EACH ¢ CHATEAU AVE _ CHATEAU AVE ® RS-2 R S-2 n ~ 1 DU EAC 1 DU EACH ~ rc ~ ~ ~ RS-2 v !DU EACH ~ ° o III I I I I I (°° 9 Reclassification No. 2004-00126 Subject Property Variance No. 2004-04619 Date: August 9, 2004 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-137 Scale: 1" = 200' Requested By: SARKIS i3ALIKJI Q.S. No. 64 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00126 -REQUESTS RECLASS9FICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE T (TRANSITION) ZONE FORMERLY THE RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE TO THE RS-2 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE. VARIANCE NO. 2004-04619 -REQUESTS WAIVER OF MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET FOR ATWO-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2004-137 -REQUEST TO ESTABLISH ATWO-LOT, 2-UNIT DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION. 1429 West Crone Avenue tg32 Lot No. Proposed Lot Area Proposed Lot Width* Proposed Lot De'th 1 :10,080 70 ft. 144 2 '8;820 .70'ft. A26 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2004--** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATfON NO. 2004-00126 BE GRANTED (1429 WEST CRONE AVENUE) - WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: THE EAST 70 FEET OF THE WEST 280 FEET OF THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF LOT 48 OF THE ANAHEIM EXTENSION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER '.MAP OF SURVEY BY WILLIAM HAMEL, A COPY OF WHICH IS SHOWN IN BOOK 3, PAGE 163, ET SEQ. ENTITLED "LOS ANGELES COUNTY MAPS". EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THAT STRIP OF LAND 60 FEET IN WIDTH CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM BY DEEDS RECORDED MARCH 2, 1908 IN BOOK 157, PAGES 334 AND IN BOOK 157, PAGE 335 OF DEEDS RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from the T (Transition) zone to the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family) zone or less intense zone. 2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for Residential Low land uses. 3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification is consistent with the Residential Low land use designation for the property and does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 5. That **** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassification of the subject property from the T (Transition) (formerly RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural)) zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) zone; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with .any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and .any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. C R1PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the T zone and to incorporate"said described property into the RS-2 zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim: That prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, a preliminary title report shall be furnished to the Zoning Division showing the legal vesting of title, a legal description and containing a map of the property. That prior to placement of an ordinance rezoning subject property on an agenda for City Council consideration, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The City Council may approve or disapprove a zoning prdinance at its discretion. If the ordinance is disapproved, the procedure set forth in Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.60.140 shall apply. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied with within one (1) year from the date of this resolution, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. 3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion. BE tT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- PC2004- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 2004. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of SENIOR SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM -3- PC2004- [DRAFT] RESOLUTION NO, PC2004--*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEtM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2004-04619 BE GRANTED (1429 WEST CRONE AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as: THE EAST 70 FEET OF THE WEST 280 FEET OF THE SOUTH 300 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF LOT 48 OF THE ANAHEIM EXTENSION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP OF SURVEY BY WM HAMEL, A COPY OF WHICH IS SHOWN IN BOOK 3, PAGE 163, ET SEQ. ENTITLED "LOS ANGELES COUNTY MAPS". EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THAT STRIP OF LAND 60 FEET IN WIDTH CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM BY DEEDS RECORDED MARCH 2, 1908 IN BOOK 157, PAGES 334 AND IN BOOK 157, PAGE 335 OF DEEDS RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having .been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing., does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the following to establish atwo-lot, RS-2 single- family residential subdivision: SECTION NO. 18.92.150 Minimum lot frontaoe on a public or orivate street (frontage abutting at least one public or private street with legal access to a oublic right-of-way or alley required; no frontage proposed). 2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted based on the special circumstances of this property due to its long depth and narrow width, making compliance with these Code standards difficult. 3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 5. That **** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Ciky Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to waive the of minimum lot frontage on a public or private street for atwo-lot single-family residential subdivision; and does hereby approve the Negative CR\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received thafthere is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the City of Anaheim Drainage Impact Mitigation Fee for the South Central Area shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is currently $ 12,353/acre. Credit will be applied for the current development. The project architect or engineer must document the existing impervious area and the proposed impervious area. If the impervious area remains the same or decreases, no fee is due. If the impervious area increases, the fee will be proportional to the increase. 2. That the City of Anaheim Sewer Impact Mitigation Fee for the Combined West Anaheim, Zone C Area shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The fee is currently $ 218 /unit far residential developments. 3. That a detail of trash barrel storage location and trash collection pickup shall be approved by the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. 4. That roll-up garage doors shall be shown on plans submitted for building permits. Said doors shall be installed and maintained as shown on submitted plans. 5. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by providing regular landscape maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty-four (24) hours from time of occurrence. 6. That Variance No. 2004-04619 is hereby granted subject to the approval and recordation of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-137, and finalization of Resolution No. 2004-00126 now pending. That signage as approved by the Planning Services Division shall be installed and readily visible from Crone Avenue, indicating the address and location of the rear house to facilitate response by emergency vehicles. 8. That the legal owner of Lot No. 2 shall acquire a recorded unsubordinated covenant granting an access easement from the legal property owner of Lot No. 1 for ingress and egress purposes to subject property. Said easement shall be designed in a manner satisfactory to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager and said covenant shall be in a farm satisfactory to the City Attorney. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division. 9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 and as conditioned herein. 10. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 11. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 7 and 9, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. -2- PC2004- 12. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. ATTEST: CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC2004- City of Anaheim [DRAFT] ~LANN~NG ~~~AR'~'Ii~Elii'Y' ,.,.. ` F '< August 9, 2004 a ~' Sarkis Balikji 1429 West Crone Avenue Anaheim, CA 92802 - Following is an excerpt from the minutes of the Anaheim City Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. 9a. CEQA Negative Declaration 9b. Reclassification No. 2004-00126 9c. Variance No. 2004-04619 9d. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-137 Owner: Sarkis Balikji, 1429 West Crone Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802 Agent: Mamdouh Mina, 9849 East Flower Street, Suite D, Bellflower, CA 90706 Location: 1429 West Crone Avenue. Property is approximately 0.45-acre, having a frontage of 70 feet on the north side of Crone Avenue, located 38 feet east of the centerline of Hampstead Street. Reclassification No. 2004-00126 -Request reclassification of the subject property from the T (Transition) formerly RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) zone. Variance No. 2004-04619 -Request waiver of minimum lot frontage on a public or private street for atwo-lot single-family residential subdivision.. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004.137 -Request to establish atwo-lot, 2-unit detached single- family subdivision. ACTION: - 1. That the legal owner shall provide the City of Anaheim with a public utilities easement if deemed necessary to provide electrical service tc the project. 2. That prior to issuance of the building permit for the new house, a final map to record the division of subject property as approved for a two (2) lot residential subdivision shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Surveyor. Following approval, the final map shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder (Subdivision Map Act, Section 66499.40). 3. That prior to approval of the final map, a maintenance covenant, shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities, including compliance with the approved Water Quality Management Plan, and a maintenance exhibit. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. 200 South Anaheim Boulevard P.0. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92803 www.anahefm.nei TEL (714) 765-5139 [DRAFT] 4. That prior to final map approval, the portions of the existing structures encroaching intoahe proposed 20-foot wide access easement shall be demolished. The legal property owner shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division. 5. That a reservation agreement for reciprocal access and maintenance of the shared driveway shall be approved by the Subdivision Section. The agreement shall be recorded subsequent to the final map. 6. That approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-137 is contingent upon approval of Variance No. 2004-04619 and Reclassification No. 2004-00126 now pending. 7. That prior to approval of the final map, Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and S, above mentioned, shall be complied with. 8. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) days from the date of this letter or unless members of the City Council request review of this decision within said 10 days. Sincerely, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary Anaheim City Planning Commission Cc: Mamdouh Mina, 9849 East Flower Street, Suite D, Bellflower, CA 90706 CR DM.doc ' SECTION 4 PETiTIONER'SSTATEMENTOF ATTACHMENT - ITEM N0. ' NSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE/CODE WAVER (NOT REQUIItED FOR PARKING WAIVER) REQUEST FOR WAVER OF CODE SECTION: ~ g < lJ { , ~ 3 d / ] ~ (A separate statement is required for each Code waiver) PERTAINING TO: (~y "C" ~ls~u i /' ew.e~.. S. Sections 1$.03.040.030 and I $.12.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code require that before any variance or Code .waiver maybe granted by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the following shall be shown: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and 2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. In order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning Administrator or Flamming Commission to arrive at a decision, please answer each of the fol]owing questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, ful]y and as completely as possible. If you need additional space, you may attach additional pages. 1. Are there special c' umstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings? Yes _ No. If your answer is "Yes," describe the special circumstances: ~~j p~ ~a P,~„ „ ~ ~, U V' }re, ~ 7 N I yl Q s 2. Are [he special circumstances [hat ply to the property different from other properties in the vicinity which are in the same zone as your property? es _ No "yes," describe how the property is different: 3. Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently enjoyed by neighboring properties located within the same zone? _ es _No If your answer if "yes," describe the special . _. 4. Were the special circums es created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or previous property owners)? _ Yes T o ' EXPLAIN The sole purpose of variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no variance or Code waiver shall be approved hick w 1 ha e the effect of granting a special privilege not shared by other property in the same vicinity and zone which is t o see ressly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property . Use variances are not permitted. ' ~ ~ Si atu e P Owner or Authorized Agent Date C TNARIANCE NO. DECEMBER 12, 2000 VAR N0. 20a4 - a 4 61.9 ITEM N0. 10 r RCL )6~T-]3 X16) ANAHEIM HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE (SC) (SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZONE Reclassification No. 2003-00109 Tentative Tract Map No. 16545 Sub)ect Property Date. August 9. 2004 Scale: Graphic Requested By: RED CURB INVESTMENTS Q.S. No. 286 RECLASSIFICATION N0. 2003-00109 -REQUESTS RECLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE T (TRANSITION) ZONE FORMERLY RS-A-43,000 (SC) (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL;SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZONE TO THE RH-2(SC) (SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL; SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) AND OS (SC) (OPEN SPACE; SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZONES. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16545 -REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 28-LOT, 21-UNIT DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION. No address 0 1433 ATTACHMENT -ITEM N0. 10 ~~ ~~°~ d~v~~~~~t~ August 3, 2004 City of Anaheim Planning Dept PO Box 3222 Anaheim, Calif. 92803 Re: Robbers Peak TTM 16545 Amy Vasquez, I am requesting an extension to the 9.6.04. Commision meeting. This will give us time to respond to the MND questions in an orderly fashion. Very $est Regards, Tom Hartley 25971 Arriba Linda, Laguna Niguel, Calif. 92677 949.364.1188 ITNM N0. 11 iHOP ~oo ~o ~~o I U~ ¢ ¢ SP 94-1 SP 94-1 RCL 65-66-24 (6) RCL 65-66-24 (32)--~- SP 94-1 RCL 65-6fi-13 DA2 RCL 65-66-24 (4) VAR 2862 EXPANDED RCL fi5-66-73 VAR 2456 INDUSTRIAL DA2 ADJ 0021 EXPANDED DA2 EXPANDED INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1 RCL 65-fib-24 (20) RCL 65-66-13 ;79) F- W W W SP 94-1 RCL 65-66-24 (27) SP 94-1 RCL 65-66-24 (16) SP 94-1 ~ RCL 65-66-13 RCL 65-66-13 RCL 65-66-24 (26) ADJ 0061 VAR 2004-04616 RCL 65-66-13 Z Q CUP 2109 RIVERBEND CUP 1865 c PACIFIC BELL (n ADJ 0057 VAR 2456 DA2 ~ IND. CENTER qDJ 0021 EXPANDED W LL DA2 EXPANDED SEAGATE SUBSTRATES, INC. INDUSTRIAL W INDUSTRIAL EXPANDED ~ INDUSTRIAL (~- ~ 509' 365'- mo t CORONADO STREET I SP 94-1 SP 94-? 96 RCL 65-fib-24 (3) SP 94-1 RCL 65-66-24 151 5P fw. RCL 65-66-73 RCL fi5-66-24 (5) RCL 65-66-?3 pq-. CUP 2001-044 5 0 RCL 65-66-13 CUP 2076 EXPANDED SPRAYON PRODUCTS fNC STORAGE YARD CUP 1997 INDUSTRIAL . DA2 DA2 IND. BLDG. EXPANDED EXPANDED DA2 INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL EXPANDED INDUSTRIAL Variance No. 2004-04618 Subject Property Date: August 9, 2004 Scale: 1" = 2D0' Requested By : ISMOS INVESTMENT COMPANY Q.S. No. 154 REQUESTS WAIVERS OF: (A) MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FREESTANDING SIGN (B) MAXIMUM WIDTH OF FREESTANDING SIGN TO WAIVE TH E MAXIMUM HEIGHT AND WIDTH L IMITATIONS TO PERMIT AND RETAIN AN EXISTING SIGN ON A FREESTANDING ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE ON AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. 3845 East Coronado Street ITEM N0. 11 Property Permitted by Code Existing and Proposed Frontage (feet) Area Height Width Area Height Wtlth 300 or more 60 s.f. 8 feet 8!feet 66 s.f. 15 feet 48 feet [DRAFT] RESOLUTION NO. PC2004--*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2004-04618 BE DENIED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AND 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 45, PAGE 47 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1983 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83- 413523 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 9, 2004, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 16.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waiver of the following to permit and retain an existing sign on a freestanding architectural feature: SECTION NO. 18.44.090.0201 Maximum size of freestanding sign (8 feet high. 8 feet wide, 60 square feet of sign area permitted; 15 feet high, 48 feet wide, 66 square feet of sign area proposed) 2. That the above mentioned waiver Is hereby denied on the basis that there are no special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape, topography, location and surroundings which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the same vicinity; and that strict application of the Zoning Code would not deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the identical zone and classification in the vicinity. 3. That there are opportunities for additional signage that the applicant may take advantage of, in the form of both wall and freestanding signage. Both options would provide comparable visibility from the street, while maintaining consistency with the size of signage that is typical for the area. 4. That since signage of this size would not be permitted for other similarly zoned properties, granting the requested variance would effectively grant a special privilege not shared by other similar properties in the vicinity. That **** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director or her authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 11 (Accessory Structures), as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. C R\PC2004-0 -1- PC2004- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance, on the basis of the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a.City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 9, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 2004. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- PC2004- SECTION 4 ATTACHMENT - ITEM N0, 11 r1;TITIONER'S STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE/CODE WAIVER (NOT REQUIRE4DnFnOR PARK! ING WAIVER) REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTION: r , 1~' \ ~ 7 ~ ~~ . 3~ PERTAINING TO: is required for each waiver) --- Sections 18.03.040.030 and 18.12.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code require that before any variance or Code waiver maybe granted by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the following shall be shown: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply [o other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and 2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. In order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning Administrator or Planning Conunission to arrive at a decision, please answer each of the following questions regarding the properly for which a variance is sought, fully and as completely as possible. If you need additional space, you may attach additional pages. 1. Are there special circumstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings? ~ Yes _ No. If your answer is "Yes," dvels_cribe the s ecial circumstances: A by ~c, fw ¢ 8 f S ~ &C~. A, ~v o~6P Q N SAC N IJ na ~~ etr{N t~t;~`i~~ ~ ~c~ppy~ d_: b~tldi~. -y S~ ~>r{' l~ddn~sg, 2. Are the special circumst ces tha apply to the property dif~rent from other properties in the vicinity which aze in the same zone as your property? X Yes _ No ..b 3. 4. The sole purpose of any variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no variance or Code waiver shall be approved w 'ch would have the effect of granting a special privilege not shazed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which snot the ' e ex r sly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property. Use variances aze not permitted. 6 .a ~ Signa r o roperty O er or thorized Agent ate CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNARIANCE NO. DECEMBER 12, 2000 VAR N0. 2004 - 0 4 6 1 8 Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently enjoyed by neighboring properties located within the same zone?~c Yes No Were the special circumstances created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or previous property owners)? y~ Yes _ No