PC 2006/07/10_~
V
e
~ ~ I~~'
Z_
D
~~
~NDED~
Council Chamber, Gity Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California
• Chairman: Gaif Eastman
• Chairman Pro-Tempore: Cecilia Flores
• Commissioners: Kelly Buffa, Stephen Faessel, Joseph
Karaki, Panky Romero, Pat Velasquez
• Call To Order
Preliminary Plan Review 1:00 P.M.
• Staff update to Commission on various City developments and issues
(As requested by Planning Commission)
• Preliminary Plan Review for items on the July i0, 2006 agenda
• Recess To Afternoon Public Hearing Session
• Reconvene To Public Hearing 2:30 P.M.
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any
item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to
the secretary.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Public Comments
• Consent Calendar
• Public Hearing Items
• Adjournment
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address planningcommission@anaheim.net
.~~ nnondav, July io, Zoos
H:\docs\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10/06)
Page 1
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 2:30 P.M.
Public Comments:
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the
Anaheim Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing
items.
Planning Commission Appointments:
Appointment of a Planning Commission Chairman (Motion)
Appointment of a Planning Commission Chairman Pro-Tempore (Motion)
Consent Calendar:
The items on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be nc separate
discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning
Commission, staff or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Minutes
1A. Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning Commission.
Meeting of June 26, 2006. (Motion)
H:\does\cleribal\agendas\07100fi.doc (07/10/06)
Page 2
Public Hearing Items:
2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Request for
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Continuance to
2c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05083 August 7, 2006
Owner: Guillermo M. Aguirre, 415 North Sunkist Street, Anaheim,
CA 92806
Agent: Rob Perez., Parsons, 19752 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite
240, Irvine, CA 92612
Location:. 1920 East Center Street: Property is approximately 0.37-
acre, having a frontage of approximately 114 feet on the
south side of Center Street and is located approximately
345 feet west of the centerline of State College Boulevard.
Request to permit a telecommunications antenna (disguised as a pine
tree) with accessory ground-mounted equipment with waiver of maximum
permitted fence height.
Continued from the May 15, and June 12, 2006, Planning Commission meetings. Project Planner
(dh errick Cs' ana h eim. neQ
Conditional' Use Permit Resolution No.
H:\docs\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10!06)
Page 3
3a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISEDI
3b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006-00175
3c. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
3d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05101
3e. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18972
Owner: Tom Doyle, 700 South Street LLC, 94 Discovery, Irvine, CA
92618
Agent: Chris Campbell, The Olson Company, 3020 Old Ranch
Parkway, Suite 400, Seal Beach, CA 90740
Location: 700 East South Street: Property is approximately 3 acres,
having frontages of 212 feet on the south side of South
Street and is located 150 feet east of the centerline of
Dakota Street.
Reclassification No. 2006-00175 -Request reclassification of the
subject property from the I (Industrial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple-Family
Residential) zone, or a less intense zone.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101 -Request to construct a 63-
unit attached condominium complex with affordable units with an
incentive for required improvement of private street, and waiver of sound
attenuation for residential developments.'
Tentative Tract Map No. 16972 - To establish a 1-lot, 63-unit airspace
attached residential condominium subdivision.
'Advertised with "and a density bonus with waivers of (a) improvement of
private street, and (b) sound attenuation for residential. developments".
Continued from the June 26, 2006, Planning Commission meeting.
Reclassification Resolution No.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
4a. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 330
(PREVIOUSLY-C E RT I F I E D-
4b. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2006.00049
Agent: City of Anaheim, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA, 92805
Location: Citywide
Request to amend Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonus) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to reflect current California State Government Code
Sections 65915 through 65918, Density Bonuses and Other Incentives,
and to request approval of a Density Bonus Implementation Regulations
document to be referenced in Chapter 18.52.
Reclassification Resolution No.
H:1d ocs\clerical\age n d as\071006. d oc
Pmject Planner:
(dsee@anaheim.net)
Request for
Continuance to
July 24, 2006
Pmject Planner:
(tsato@anaheim.nef)
(07/10/06)
Page 4
5a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
5b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
Sc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05084
Owner: The Church in Anaheim, 2528 West La Palma. Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92801-2611
Agent: Michio Miyake, Acaciawood School, Inc., 2530 West La
Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801
Location: 2530 West La Palma Avenue: Property is approximately
2.2 acres, having frontages of 180 feet on the south side of
La Palma Avenue and is located 676 feet east of the
centerline of Magnolia Avenue (Acaciawood. School).
Request to expand and retain an existing private school in conjunction
with an existing church to add grades 1 through 7 to an existing school for
grades 8 through 12 with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
6b WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.2005-05055
Owner: Albert Bahu, 757 Encanto, Corona, CA 92883
Location: 5700 East La Palma Avenue: _Property is approximately
0.52-acre and is located at the southeast corner of La
Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway.
Request to construct a three (3) unit commercial retail center and to
permit roof-mounted equipment in the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone
with waiver of minimum landscape and structural setback.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
H:\docs\cl a ri ca I\agen d as\071006. doc
Project Planner:
(dherrick ~anaheim. net)
Request for
Continuance to
July 24, 2006
Project Planner.
(kwong2~anaheim.neq
(07/10/06}
Page 5
7a. CEQA ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 330
(PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED)
7b GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-00431
7c. AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE NORTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 94-1
(TRACKING NO.. SPN2006-00035)
Owner: City-Initiated
Location: Citywide and as described in the tables below.
Request: General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 -
City -initiated (planning Department) request to amend the
Land Use, Circulation, Green and Growth Management
Elements of the General Plan to incorporate various textual
refinements and clarifications; to update various maps and
tables resulting from General Plan Amendments approved
since the 2004 comprehensive update to the General Plan, to
revise the Corridor Residential land use designation
description to allow for detached single-family residential
uses in conjunction with attached. single-family residential
uses and to remove references to the minimum one acre
project size requirement; to amend the Green Element to
include three additional parks and the expansion of an
existing park facility; and, to redesignate properties as
identified in the tables below:
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431
Locatton: ~ `~~~
~~ ~ .Existing Designatwn. _
~~
~ =,-,Proposed Designation ~ - ~~'
Broadway/Manchester Ave.
APN: 03605027 Parks Railroad
Broadway/Manchester Ave. (APN:
none General Commercial Railroad
853 W. Cottonwood Circle Open Space Parks
1280E Lincoln Ave. Schools Medium Density Residential
1710 S Anaheim Way General Commercial Parks
1730 5 Anaheim Way General Commercial Parks
Anaheim Way, west of Claudina Way
APN: 08223078 General Commercial Parks
Anaheim Way, west of Claudina Way
APN: 08223080 General Commercial Parks
2748 W Lincoln Ave.. Low-Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential
2726 W Lincoln Ave. Low-Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential
2736 W Lincoln Ave. Low-Medium Density Residential Medium: Density Residential
Southwest of Santa Ana St./Olive St.
APN: 25108124 Low-Medium Density Residential Railroad
1001 N Harbor Blvd. Institutional General Commercial
515 W La Palma Ave. Institutional General Commercial
1011N Harbor Blvd. Institutional General Commercial
525 W La Palma Ave. Institutional General Commercial
.,,1340. N Red Gum St. General Commercial Industrial
1330 N Red Gum SL General Commercial Industrial
1320 N Red Gum St. General Commercial Industrial
1310 N Red Gum St. General Commercial Industrial
H:\dots\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10/06)
Page 6
.Location Existing Designation Proposed Designation
2985 E Miraloma Ave. General Commercial Industrial
2963 E Miraloma Ave. General Commercial Industrial
2926 E Miraloma Ave. General Commercial Industrial
2940E Miraloma Ave. General Commercial Industrial
1260 N Red Gum St. General Commercial Industrial
8160 E Bauer Institutional Parks
'Advertised as Cottonwood Cir.Nermont Ave. (APN: 03627027)
Specific Plan No. 2006-00035 -Amendment No. 3 to the Northeast
Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 to adjust its associated Development Area
(DA) boundaries to be consistent with the revised General Plan land
use designations proposed as part of GPA2005-00431, as identified in
the following table below.
Specific Plan No. 2006-00035
Location ~ ~
- - ! _ Current
~'
Development Area
Proposed Development Area
-
1340 N Red Gum St. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
1330 N Red Gum St. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
1320 N Red Gum St. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
1310 N Red Gum St. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
2985 E Miraloma Ave. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
2963 E Miraloma Ave. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
2926 E Miraloma Ave. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
2940E Miraloma Ave. ' DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
1260 N Red Gum St. DA 5 -Commercial DA 1 -Industrial
General Plan Amendment Resolution No.
Specific Plan Resolution No.
Project Planner:
(ethien ~anaheim.net)
H:\dots\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10/06)
- Page 7
~ __._
Sa. CEQA ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 330
(PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED)
8b ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2006-00046
(Tracking Nos. SPN N0. 2006-00037, SPN NO. 2006-00038, SPN NO. 2006-
00039, SPN NO. 2006-00040, SPN NO. 2006-00041)
Owner: City-Initiated
Location: Citywide:
Request: City-initiated request (Planning Department) to amend various
sections of Title 18 "Zoning" of the Anaheim Municipal Code to
correct various errors and omissions; clarity text; provide
consistency with other chapters. of the Anaheim Municipal Code
including provisions related to bingo games and permitting trailers
to be parked in driveways; increase encroachment allowances for
patios and canopies in the RS-3 and RS-4 Zones; allow the
Planning Director to approve refuse containers fully screened
from public view in the front setback; provide more flexible criteria
for architecturally enhancing building walls; allow additional
commercial uses within the O-H Zone when fully integrated with
an office building; provide aprocess-for "Dwelling Unit Transfers"
within certain areas of the PTMU (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use)
Overlay Zone; add "Community and Religious Assembly" to the
list of uses permitted in a residential structure subject to a
conditional use permit; modify special event permit requirements;
modify setbacks for certain locations along Anaheim Boulevard
and. Lincoln Avenue to provide consistency with existing building
setbacks; change procedures related to the Zoning Administrator;.
provide an appeal process for Planning Director decisions;
provide an administrative review process for "Minor
Modifications"; streamline the administrative adjustment public
hearing process; modify development requirements related to the
implementation of the General Plan Corridor Residential land use
designation; modify requirements for small collection recycling
facilities; modify sign standards for the Disneyland Resort
Specific No. 92-1 (Adjustment No. 6 - SPN2006-00037); amend
the zoning and development standards for the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 fn their entirety to provide consistent
formatting with Title 18 (Zoning Code) along with minor
modifications and clarifications (Adjustment No. 5 - SPN2006-
00038); modify sign standards for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan
No. 93-1 (Adjustment No. 2 - SPN2006-00039); allow hospitals by
conditional use permit in Development Area 4 and fast food and
take-out restaurants as primary permitted uses in Development
Area 5 of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (Adjustment
No. 10 - SPN2006-00040); and, provide a procedure for fence
relocation in the Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan No. 87-
1 (Adjustment No. 1 - SPN2006-00041).
Project Planner:
(skimQanaheim.net)
Adjourn To Monday, July 24, 2006 at 1:00 P.M. for Preliminary
Plan Review.
H:\dots\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10/06)
Page 8
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
1-0~00 a.m. July 6, 2006_.
(TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND
COUNCIL DISPLAY K/,IOSK
SIGNED: ~ ~;/I,VGLC~~~~~ V~C~f.If.~ Y~
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written
correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use
Permits and. Variances will be final 22 days after Planning Commission action and any action regarding
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 days after Planning Commission action unless a timely
appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied
by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing
before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing.
ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the Planning Department, (714) 765-5139. Notificaticn no later than 10:00 a.m.
on the Friday before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting.
Recorded decision information is available 24 hours a day by calling the Planning Department's
Automated Telephone System at 71.4-765-5139.
H:\dots\clerical\agendas\071006.doc (07/10/06)
Page 9
C
SCHEDULE
2006
July 24
(~ August 7 ~~
August 21
September 6 (Wed)
September 18
October 2
October 16
October 30
November 13
November 27
December 11
December 27 (Wed)
H:\dots\clerical\agendas\071006.dac (07/10/06)
Page t0
Item No. 2
N
W
Q O Q
~W 3
N O
V)
F
U
BOA
N
TN
CondtionaL.Use Permit No. 2006-05083
Requested By: ROB PEREZ
1920 East Center Street
'-y1GMe VA~VP0.110 ~. I
1pU WEIN RSGHNIREL I
1
~
~,
SREE / ;
35
5
ER
(~
~
S
GE ~ qLL 545538
4'
„ CUP ]BW
]
~ GG qR 1015
5 0
~
G DIG 4UU WSTA
T~
E1UP Q
~
~ G
G
RCLb0.553B W
f C-G VAR 159 I
RCL 52-5]-1U
CUP R20 VAR 1&10"11
~'T GRPETS ...
~
VPR BSfiS WAREHOUSE O
SMALL 6HOP5 ypR 1~B1B-5 m
RESTAURANT DENIAL
OF£ILE W
LINCOtN
AVENUE ~
O
AGa 6164 U
9 W
pGl P 693 !a-
~m0.1pT5 !q
W PY
BROPO GG
RGL fit-fi}ZB
<NGWFRINf.
i~2 3
fi
-1 X C-G
1562 CLS}54-1Z 11
CUP T663
VAR 1646 Z
TAMPICO U
1-12 MOTEL
lUr
C-G r
RCL 65E6-66
VAR 1946
ADJ 0167
WALGREENS
PHARMACY
GG
ANAHEIM TOWN /L
50UARE 1/////pp\\V\\
Itl
Subject Property
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: 1" = 200'
Q.S. No. 102
10039
r
.Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item. No. 2
2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion for Continuance)
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
2c. .CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05083
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This irregularly-shaped 0.37 acre property has a frontage of approximately 114 feet
on the south side of Center Street with a maximum depth of 166 feet and is located
approximately 345 feet west of the centerline of State College Boulevard
(1920 East Center Street).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of
Code Section 18.08.030.040.0402 and 18.38.060 to permit a telecommunications
antenna (disguised as a pine tree) with accessory ground-mounted equipment with
waiver of the following:
SECTION 18.46.110.030 Maximum fence heioht
(DELETED)
:BACKGROUND:
(3) This request was continued from the May 15, and June;12, 2006, Planning
Commission meetings at the request of the applicant tq explore alternatives.
{4) This property is improved as a parking lot for the adjacent parcel (1925 East
Lincoln Avenue- Mi Fondita restaurant) and is zoned C-G (General Commercial).
The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Mixed Use land uses and
its surrounding properties to the north, east and west for Mixed Use land uses and
to the south (across Lincoln Avenue) for Low Density Residential land uses.
(5) The applicant, Rob Perez, has submitted the attached letter dated June 22, 2006,
requesting a further 30-day continuance to the August 7, 2006, meeting in order to
further evaluate a location for a building mounted stealth facility.
'RECOMM'ENDATION:
(6) That the Commission, by motion,. continue this item to the August 7, 2006,
Planning Commission. meeting.
Cup2006-05083conV-10-2008
Attachment -Item No. 2
-----Original t9essage-----
From: emailrobperez@gmail.com [mailto:emailrobperez@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Rob Perez
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:50 PM
To: De11a Herrick
Subject: Re: PC Meeting
Thanks for the heads up. Yes I do need to
request another continuance for the Nextel application at 1920 E.
Center St. Please continue the item to the August 7, 2006 meeting.
Thank you
Rob Perez
Parsons for Nextel
310-798-9839
Item No.
RM.3 169 RG~ ~ R qZ 269
v V P v PR 4244 Lp\NG
BV
ROG a6Q 422
~VP OMpSpN
OO
T tNpUS-CFltp'~'
R3 90
P O
ME
FF.A
O J oog6
PWPREHOUSE ~H S.`REE-C
\NO~ FpG1l~~ ~V
S
2121
~ _„ ~ ~
V PR 1948.24
t
1
1
O,T, 06~NG pME ON
pUF;~vjPFtENOU
1
C((Y 05WG DN~E ON
pUR& W pFtEHOU
Reclassification No. 2006-00175
Conditional-Use Permit No. 2006-051.01
Tentative Tract Map No. 16972
Requested By: TOM DOY~E
700 East South Street
nVON P~,
C
v
~~
0
~i
mo~a
26
5
1-52-
C~ ~ o
R
m m
3
m n
~ c
a~
Dc
m
1
;~~ Subject Property
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: 1" = 200'
Q.S. No. 94
y
'' :;v.
a
~,
~.
~.7 `" ar '
~AV
1V
I Photo:
Reclassification hlo. 2006-00175
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101
Tentative Tract Map No. 16972
Requested By: TOM DOYLE
Subject Property
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: 1" = 200'
Q.S. No. 94
700 East South Street
coma
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3 ,
3a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISED) (Motion)
3b. RECLASSIFICATION NO.2006-00175 (Resolution)
3c. 'WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT (Motion)
3d. CONDITIONAL'USE PERMIT N0:2006-05101 (Resolution)
3e. TENTATIVE TRACTMAP N0.16972 (Motion)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly-shaped 3-acre parcel has a frontage of 212 feet on south side of South
Street, a maximum depth of 630 feet, and is located 150 feet east of the centerline of Dakota
Street (700 East South Street).
REQUEST::.
-- (2) The applicant requests approval of the following:
Reclassification No. 2006-00175 -to reclassify the property from the I {Industrial) zone to
the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone, orless intense zone.
o -Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101 - to construct a 63-unit attached condominium
complex with affo~dabie units antl incentive for required improvement of right-of-way (50
required; 41 proposed)" under the authority of Section Nos. 18.06.030.040.0402 and
'18.06.160.010 and:Government Code Section 65919 with waiver of:
(a) SECTION N0. 18.40.090.060 Sound attenuation for residential developments (65
d6 CNEL required forYecreational areas; 75 dB
CNEL proposed).
o 'Tentative Tract Map No. 16972 - to establish a 1-lot, 63-unit, airspace attached residential
rcondominium subdivision.
'Advertised as "and a density bonus with waivers of (a) improvement of private street,. and. (b) sound
.attenuation for residential developments"
BACKGROUND:
(3) This request was continued from the June 26, 2006, Planning Commission meeting in order for
the applicant to complete revisions to the proposed elevations.
(4) The,property istleveloped with an industrial building is zoned I (Industrial), antl is located in
the Merged Redevelopment Project Area. The Anaheim General Pian designates this
property for Medium Density Residential land uses. Properties to the north (across South
Street), south, and west. are designated for Medium Density Residential land uses; and
properties to the east (across the railroad tracks) are designated fior Institutional land uses.
PREVIOUS ZONING ACTIONS:
(5) Variance No. 2236 (waiver of minimum height and permitted location of a freestanding sign)
- ~ ' was approved. by the Commission in 1971. This entitlement is no longer necessary and can
be terminated.
!. SR-RCL2006-00175ds
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(6) .The applicant proposes to reclassify the subject property from the I zone to the RM-4 zone in
conformance with the General Plan. The applicant also proposes to construct a 63-unit,
attached.single-family residential condominium subdivision. The tentative tract map indicates
an "air space" subdivision that would consist of 1 residential lot. The site plan (Exhibit No. 1)
indicates the following:
iDevelo merit Standards Pro osed Pro'ect RM-4 Zone Standards '
Site Area 3 acres 133;560 s.f. N/A
Numberbf Dweilin Units 63 dwellin units "111 units max.
Land Area per Unit 2,120 s.f.
21 units/acre 1,200 s.f. per unit min.
36 units/acre
Lot Covera a 28% 55% max.
Recreation/Leisure Area 345 s.f. per: unit
21,792 s uare feet total 200 s:f. per unit
12,600 s.f. total
(7) The site plan. and tentative tract map indicate the following setbacks:
~1:...w~i..:~. .0............1 n..J.. o......:~.J
,$etbacks'~Minirrium `~` Setbacks*-`
North (adjacent to South Street) 20 feet to building 20 feet to building,
15 feet to orches 15 feet to orches
East (adjacent to railroad tracks). '50 feet 20 feet,
5-13 feet landsca ed 5 feet landsca ed
.South. (adjacent to apartments) 33 feet 20 feet,
5feetlandsca ed 5feetlandsca ed
West (adjacent. to a public alley 70 feet' 20 feet,
and a artments 5 feet landsca ed
Modification to standards is allowed in order to achieve goad project design, privacy, livability, and. compatibility
with surrounding uses..
(8) The site plan further indicates that the project. is designed with 9 individual buildings with 7
.units in each building. Buildings are separated by private yards, central landscaped "paseos"
which vary from 23 to 47 feet in width, and.private drives. Codefequires a minimum of 40 feet
between the buildings: Setbacks of 23 to 47 feet are. proposed between buildings.. However,
.Code further allows modification to these standards in order to achieve gootl project design,
.;privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. In the case of this project, these
igbjectives will be achieved by the provision of heavy landscaping, articulated building planes,
balconies porches, and strategically-located windows which allow for adequate privacy.
(9) The floor plans (Exhibit Nos. 2 - 6) for the attached, townhouse-style units.indicate 2 and 3-
storybuildings consisting of a living room, dining. room, kitchen, patio, bedrooms,bathrooms,
deck, laundry area, and attached 2-car garages. The unit. types are summarized as follows:
Page 2
Plan: Alo of. Utttts Living area {s f) No, oT Bedraoins
W W y ~
~~~ ,
N
~~ Y _
, _
t3
1 8 1,475 ~3 Bed
2 55 1,570 2 Bed
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 20D6
Item No. 3
{15) The conceptual jandscape plan (Exhibkt No. 10) indicatesa dense mixture of 24-:and 36-inch
box trees arranged throughout theproject site. A mixture of evergreen trees and shrubs would
be provided within the. landscaped setback along the South Street frontage and interior private
driveway system throughout the project. Vine pockets and shrubs are proposed next to the
garages for each of the units. A 5-fook wide planter with. l3-foot wide"pop-outs" and a row of
24-inch box trees is proposed along the east property line adjacenf to the railroad tracks.
Code requires one 24-inch boXevergreen tree for every 20 feet of street frontage to be planted
in the landscape setback adjacent to each public street. A ayered landscaped theme is
required to provide depth and variety within the andscaped setback. 'Code further requires
that50%bf all shrubbery be a minimum of 5 gallon in size at the time of planting.;The future
homeowner's association would be responsible formaintaining the on-site landscaping.
Submitted;plans cdmply with Code requirements.' As a recommended condition of approval,
the applicant would be required to submit final detailed landscape plans for staff review.
(16) ,The landscape plan further indicates a 6-foot high block wall adjacent to alley along the west
property line, a 6-foot high block wall adjacent to apartments along the south property line, and
<a 14-foot high block wall adjacent tothe railroad rack along the east property line for sound.
attenuation purposes.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
{17) Staff has reviewed the proposal to construct a 63-unit attached condominium complex and the
initial Study (a copy of which is aveilable for review in the Planning Department) and finds no
sighificant ehvironmehtal impact and, therefore, recommends that a tegative Declaration be
:approved upon a finding by the Commission that the declarationreflects the independent
judgment of the lead agency; and that it has considered the proposed Negative. Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review. process: and further finding on
the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect oh the environment
EVALUATION:
(18) The Anaheim General Pian designates this property for Medkum Density Reskdential land uses,
with a density range of 0 to36 dwelling unitsper acre:. The applicantproposes 83,attached
condominium dwelling units at a density of 21 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed
reclassification from he l zone to the RM-4 zone would be compatible with the existing
residential development in the area and the density pe[mitted under the General Pian.-:The
density bonus allowed. by State l.aw is not being requested, only. the incentive and parking
reduction.
(19) The project site contains parcels identified as a portion of Site No. 25 of the Central Anaheim
Area within the Housing Element with a density range of up to 45 units pef acre (36 units per
acre allowed!in the RM-4 zone plus a 35 percent density bonus per State Law). Based on this
,density, the subject 3 acre site could accommodate a maximum of 135 units; however, a total
of 63 units are planned. Thus, the proposetl reclassification from an industrial to multiple-
family residential zone would result in an increase in the City's housing stock and would be
consistent with the goals and policies contained in the Housing Element. '
(20) The applicant has submitted the attached density bonus application requesting incentives
pursuant to'State Law. `Section :65915 (b) of the Government Code, in relevant part, requires
that the City'must approve a density bonus end incentives when an applicant agreis to
:provide specified levels of affordable housing. The applicant isentitled to receive one
incentive or concession: for projects that include at least 10 percent of the total units for
:Page 4
Staff Report to the
.Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3
modetate income households: (Government Code Section 65915 (d) (2)J The City must
grant the incentive orconcession requested unless it makes the findings. set forth in Section
65915(d)(1). Section 85915(1) defines a concession ocincentive to mesh any of the following:
"(1) A reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code requirements
orarchitectural design requirements that exceed the minimum building standards approved by
the California Building Standards Commission ss provided in Part 2:5 (commencing wfth
Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Heafth:and Safety. Code, including, but not limited to, a
reduction in setback and square footage requirements and in the ratio of vehicular parking
spaces that would otherwise be required that results in identifiable, financially sufficient, and
actual cost reductions.
(2) Approval of mixed use zoning in conjunction with the housing project if commercial, office,
industrial, or other land uses will reduce. the cost of the :housing development and if the
commercial, office, industrial, or otherJand uses are compatible: with the housing project and
the existing or planned development in the area where.the proposed housing project will be
located.
(3) Dther regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the developer or the city, county,.
br city and county that result in identifiable, financially efficient, and actual cost reductions.
This subdivision does not limit or require the provision of direct financial incentives. for the
housing development, including the. provision `of publicty owned land, by the cfty, :county, or city
and oounfy, or the waiver of fees or dedication requirements." A copy of Section 65915 is
attached to this staff report.
(21) The incentive pertains to required improvement of right-of-way. Public Works Standard Detail
No:'462, pertaining to right-of-waydesign fora 2-lane Private (residential) Street, requires a
`width of 50 feet. Plans indicate a 41 foot width for the proposed,private street. The applicant
has waiver of this requirement as an incentive pursuant to State Law (Govt. Code Section
85915). State Law requires that one incentivebe granted for projects that provide a minimum
of at least 10 percent of the total units for moderate income households, therefore, since seven
<of the dwelling units (11 %) within the complexwill be allocated fpr moderate income residents,
the project would. be In compliance with the density bonus provision of State Law.
(22) The requested waiver pertains to sound attenuation for residential projects. Code requires
exterior noise within common recreation areas of anysingle family attached project to be
attenuated to not exceed a maximum of 65 d6 CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level).
The CNELaccountsfocsingle event noise as part of a 24-hour time-weighted average.
Interior noise levels shall be attenuated to a maximum of 45 d6 CNEL. Based on a noise
study prepared by Venekiasen Associates dated November 16, 2005, #orthe existing railroad
track along the east side of the property, the worst case unmitigated noise exposure would be
approximately 75 dB CNEL. To mitigate the noise, the applicaht proposes to construct a 14-
fobthigh block wall along the railroad track boundary consistent with the other residential
projects in the area. This would teduce the exterior noise exposure to 69 to 73 CNEL. To
ferther reduce exterior noise levels, the Redevelopment Agency is in the process of creating a
"Quiet Zone" at four grade crossings near he site. The purpose of a Quiet Zone is to eliminate
the use of train horns at each of the crossings, wh(ch is a large contributorto the single-event.
noise levels generated by the train. The Agency will be required to construct new vehicular
Wand pedestrian bamers at each crossing. Since the: property has a narrow lot depth that would
make R difficult to construct s multiple fam(ly project without the need for this sound attenuation
waiver, and since the applicant proposes to mitigate train. noise with a sound wall and the
Agency proposes to establish a Quiet Zone at adjacent grade crossings and thereby further
reduce sound levels at the subject site, staff recommends aoaroval of this waiver.. With
Page 5
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3
respect to interior noise, the applicant proposes to comply with the requiredA5 dB CNEL
standard by;installing double glazed windows with. a maximum acoustical rating. With the
appropriate sound transmission. control glass as identified in thesound study,`the interior noise
levels. would comply with code requirements.
(23) The applicant,requests econditional use permit to construct a 63-unit attached condominium.
<: complex with affordable units and incentives. Attached single family ~esidentral projects are
permitted in the RM-4 zone, subject to the approval bf a conditional use permit under authority
of Code Section 18.06:160. The project would facilitate the replacement of incompatible
rblighted industrial properties with new residential developmenfin an area containing other
residential uses. The Redevelopment Agency has invested in new infrastructure, new housing
developments, historic preservation projects, and urban office and commercial developments
in the Downtown area The proposed RM-4 zoning ciassificattonfor his property.would
':complement and support the existing and proposed development in the Downtown area, the
> goals and objectives of the Merged Redevelopment Project Area,:and ongojng City programs
:,identified in Anaheim's Housing Element. Therefore, staff recommends aooroval of this
.conditional use permit request.
(24) Although the proposed building design incorporates articulation and architectural detail, staff
7ecommends Ghat final plans be eubmitted for: staff review to ensure that all the details of the
wnstruction'reflect aquality project. Staff will 6e reviewing the final plans foccolors and
materials and to ensure that the architectural details are incorporated into the final elevations.
(25) Modification to development standards, including minimum lot width, minimum floor area,
maximum site coverage, eetbacks, and minimum size of recreational-leisure areas are allowed
in order to achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and competibiltty with surrounding
uses as outlined In Code Section 18.06.160.1+Before the Planning Commission approves these
modifications, it shall make the following'findings:
(i) The uses within the project are compatible;
(il) ` New buildings dr structures related to .the. project are compatible with the scale, mass,
bulk,'and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing
buildings conform with the provisions of this title
(iii) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate;
(iv) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
(v) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner. not detrimental to the. particular area;
(vi) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden :upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
(vii) The project complies with the General Plan and any applicable zoning or specific plan;
and
(viii) She granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
be detrimental to the peace, fiealth, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City
df Anaheim.
Page 6
:Staff Report to the
Planning Gommission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3
(26) The setback modification is being requested for (a) distance between buildings; 40 #eet is
>required between buildings and 23 to 47 feet isproposed and (b) setback adjacent to the alley;
20 feat is required and 10 feet is proposed. ,Staff believes that these mbdifications`would be
justified in this case since the amount of recreational space exceeds Code requirements,
enhanced private and common yard areas are being provided, and the site design,
architecture,landscaping, and window arrangement achieves the intent of these development
standards. To maximize the efficiency of the site, code required setbacks are provided where
it is most important, with the deviation proposed where appropriate. Overall, the proposed
project would be compatible with existing and surrounding land uses ahd that this modification
from the Code allowed under the Planned.. Unit Development Ordinance (Chapter 18.06} would
achieve a good project designed to preserve and enhance the neighborhood in a manner that
is compatible in scale,. mass and bulk with existing buildings in the area and' consistent with.. the
design guidelines for the area. Therefore,. staff recommends aoproval of the request, as
conditioned.
FINDINGS: r
{27) When practical difficulties or unnecessary hartlships result from strict enforcement bf the
Zoning Code,:a modification may be granted for the purpose of assuringYhat no property,
because ofspeciatcircumstances applicable to it, shall be deprived of privileges commonly
enjoyed by otherproperties in the same vicinity and zone. The sole purpose of any code
waiver is to prevent discriminatiop and none shall be approved which would. have the effect of
granting a specialprivilege not shared by othersimilar properties=Therefore, before any code
waiver is granted by the Planning;Commission, it shall be shown:
(a) That there are special circumstances applicable tq the property such as size, shape,
aopography, location or surroundings,which donot apply to othef'tdenticallyioned
:properties in the vicinity; and
(b) .That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed. by
other properties urtder identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
(28) 'Before the Planning Commission grants any conditional use permit, it must make a finding of
fact that the evidence presented shows that all of tfte following :conditions exist:
(a) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized
by the Zoning Code, or is an unlisted use as defined in Subsection .030 (Unlisted
Uses Permitted) of Section 18.6fi.040 (Approval Authority);
(b) `' That the proposed. use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth
and development of the area'ih which it is :proposed to be located;
(c} That the size and shape of the site proposed focthe use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner hot detrimental ko the particular area or
o the health and safety;
(d) .That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon
he streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
C-will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Page 7 ,
-' - -- -
.Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 3
(29) The State Subdivisiorz Map Act (Government Code, Section 66473.5) makes it mandatory to
includo_in all motions approving, or recommending approval of a tract map, a specific finding
that the proposed Subdivision together.with:its design and improvement is consistent with the
City's General Plan.
Further, the law requires that the Commission make any of the following findings when
::denying or recommending denial. of a tract map:
1. , That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable General and Specific Plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with
:applicable General and Specific. Plans.
3. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. ,
5.: That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are ikely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife
or their habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause
serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with
::easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property
within. the proposed subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION:
(30) Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Planning Commission, including the
evidence presented in.this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Planning Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, aoorove a CEQA Negative Declaration.
(b) By resolution, a~orove Reclassification No. 2006-00175 to reclassify the subject
property from the I (Industrial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple Family Resldenttal) zone, or
less intense zone, by adopting the attached resolution. including the findings and
conditions contained therein.
(c) By motion, aoorove a waiver of sound attenuation for residential projects since the
applicantproposes to mitigate train: noise to levels consistent with other residential
projects In the vicinity and the Agency proposes to establish a Quiet Zone thereby
reducing train noise at nearby grade crossings.
(d) By resolution, aoorove Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101 to construct a planned
- unit development for an attached condominium complex with affordable units with
:modifications of (a} distance between buildings and (bj setback adjacent to the alley,
by adopting the attached resolution including the findings and conditions contained
therein, and further approve an incentive for improvement of right-of-way pursuant to
Section 65915 of the Government Code.
Page 8
- - - - - -'_
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 1-0, 2006
Item No. 3
(e) By motion, approve Tentative Tract Map No. 16972 to establish. a 1-lot, 63-unit,
airspace attached residential condominium. subdivision by approving the attached tract
map excerpt including the findings and conditions contained herein.
Page 9
C
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006--***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006-00175 BE GRANTED
(700 EAST SOUTH STREET)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF DREYFUS AND OTHER LANDS, 1N THE CITY OF ANAH£Itvl, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STATE OP CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP .OF SUP.VEY MADE BY
WILLIAM HAMEL AND FILED FOR RECORD IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, A COPY OF
WHICH 3S FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUtJTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ON PAGES 163 AND FOLLOWING OF 900K 3, ENTITLED "LOS ANGELES
COUNTY RECORDS" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
$EGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OP
CENTERLINE OF ORANGE STREET, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SURVEY OF WILLIAM
HAMEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ORIGINAL ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND $30 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALiFORN1A; THENCE SOUTH 74°30' WEST ALONG SAID LINE TO A LINE
DISTANT THEREON 210.00 PEET FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE
A7CHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S b0 FOOT STREP OF LAND
DESCRIBED iN DEED TO THE CALIFORNIA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY RECORDED
MARCH 26, 1988 IN 600k 407, PAGE 135 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; Tf-FENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SA{D PARALCEL LINE TO A LINE
DISTANT THEREON 660.00 FEET FROM AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE
"ORIGINAL ANAHEIM" THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL
LINE TO FHE SAID PROLONGATION OF THE CENTERLINE OF ORANGE STREET, THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF THE NORTH NOW INCLUDED IN SOUTH STREET
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ANV PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN THE SAID ATCHISON,
TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S LAND.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on July i0, 2006, at 2:30 p.m:, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required bylaw
and in accordance with the provisions. of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures", to hear and
consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration. of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. That the applicant proposes reclassification of subject property from the t (Industrial) zone to the
RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone, or less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates the property for Medium Density Residential land
uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly~and proper development of the community.
CR\PC2005-0 -1- PC2005-
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted
uses generally established throughout the community because it would result in a residential project that is
consistent with the type of housing envisioned for the Downtown.
5. That °'* indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify the subject property from the I (Industrial) zone to the RM-4
(Multiple Family Residential) zone;. and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the
declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning. Map of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the I (Industrial} zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone,. or less intense zone, based upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, a preliminary title report
shall be furnished to the Planning Services Division showing the legal vesting of title, a legal description and.
containing a map of the property
2. That the approval of Reclassification No. 2006-00175 is granted subject to the approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101, now pending.
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations.
Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning. of, or a
commitment by the Clty to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City
Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its•sole
discretion.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all
of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or
unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competentjurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
-2- PC2005-
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 10, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 16.60 "Procedures" of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and maybe replaced by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning. Commission held on
July 10, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
2006.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION.
-3-
PC2005-
C ~ _ __
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006--"°
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05101 BE GRANTED
(700 EAST SOUTH STREET)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit to construct a 63-unit attached condominium complex with affordable units and an incentive for
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
THAT PORTION OF DREYFUS AND OTHER LANDS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE, STAT€ Of CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP.OF SURVEY MADE BY
\hdILLIAM HAMEL AND FILED FOR RECORD IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, A COPY OF
UJHICH IS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ON PAGES 163 AND FOLLOWING OF HOOK 3, ENTITLED "L05 ANGELES
COUNTY RECORDS" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION DF THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF
CENTERLINE OF ORANGE STREET, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF SURVEY OF WILLIAM
HAMEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ORIGINAL ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN ON MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND 1130 OF DE'r05, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELS
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTH 74° 30' WEST ALONG SAID LINE TO A LINE
DISTANT THEREON 2'10.00 FEET FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST L[NE OF THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S 50 FOOT STRIP OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CALIFORNIA CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY RECORDED
MARCH 26, 1988 tN BOOK 407, PAGE i35 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE
DISTANT THEREON 860.00 FEET PROM AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE
"ORIGINAL ANAHEIM" THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL
LINE TO THE SAID PROLONGA710N OF THE CENTERLINE OF ORANGE STREET, THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION. TO THE POINT 4F BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF THE NORTH NOW INCLUDED IN SOUTH STREET,
ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN THE SAID ATCHISON,
TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S LAND.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on Juiy 10, 2006 at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,60, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed. conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and that. said hearing was continued from the
June 26, 2006, Planning Commission meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed request to construct a 63-unit attached condominium complex with
affordable units and incentive is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized as a Planned
Unit Development by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.32.030.120 with the following waiver:
___ .. (a) SECTION NO. 18.40.090.060
Sound attenuation for residential developments
65 dB CNEL required for recreational areas; 73 dB
CNEL proposed).
Cr\PC2006-0
-1-
PC2006-
®_ ___ _
1. That the waiver of sound attenuation for residential development is hereby approved
because the subject property has a narrow lot depth that would make it difficult to construct a multiple family
project without the need for this sound attenuation waiver; and the Agency proposes to establish a Quiet
.Zone at adjacent grade crossings thereby further reducing sound levels at the subject site. In addition, the
height of the sound wall proposed is consistent. with other sound walls approved in the area. for residential
projects.
2. That at least ten (10) percent of the total units will be allocated for moderate income
households; therefore, the project would be in compliance with the density bonus provisions of State Law
(Government Code Section 65915).
3. That the incentive pertaining to improvement of right-of-way is hereby approved because the
applicant has submitted a density bonus application requesting this as an incentive pursuant tc State Law
(Govt. Code Section 65915). State Law requires that one incentive be granted for projects that provide a
minimum of at least ten (10) percent of the total units far moderate income households. This project
provides affordable units for moderate income households for 11 percent of its units.
4. That the proposed project is compatible with existing and surrounding land uses and
maintains good overall project design.
5. That the project would: not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed because the site plan is well designed with adequate
setbacks to the street and within the development.
6. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
7. That the granting of this conditional use. permit under the conditions imposed, would not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
8. That modification to development standards would be compatible with existing and
surrounding land uses and that the modifications from the Code allowed under the Planned Unit
Development Ordinance (Chapter 18.06) would achieve a good project designed to preserve and enhance
the neighborhood.
9. That the modification would allow for a development that exceeds the amount of recreational
space required by code and promotes compatibility with. surrounding development in a manner that would
not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is
proposed.
10. That **" indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that
the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration. together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does
-hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the fdllowing conditions which. are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
-2- PC2006-
___ _® e --
That the City of Anaheim Sewer Impact Mitigation fee for the Old Town Basin 8 Area shall be paid.
2. That all existing driveway approaches on South Street shall be removed and. replaced with curb, gutter,
parkway landscaping, and sidewalk. A Right-of-Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the
Public Works Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building
permits.
3. That prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division for review and approval a Water Quality Management Plan that:
• Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as minimizing impervious areas,
maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero
discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas.
• Incorporates: the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area
Management Plan.
• Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP.
• Describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs.
• Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the
Treatment Control BMPs, and
• Describes the mechanism for funding the long-tern operation and maintenance of the Treatment
Control BMPs.
4. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall:
• Demonstrate that all structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and
installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications.
• Demonstrate that the applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in the
Project WQMP.
• Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Project WQMP are available
onsite.
• .Submit for review and approval by the City an Operation and. Maintenance Plan for alf structural
BMPs.
5. That all driveways shall be constructed with ten (10) foot radius curb returns as required by the City
Engineer in conformance with Engineering Standard No. 115. Said information. shall be specfcally shown.
on plans submitted for building permits.
6. That gates shall not be installed across the driveway in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular
traffic ih the adjacent public street. Installation of any gates shall conform to Engineering Standard Plan
No. 475 and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Services Division prior to issuance
of a building permit.
7. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for his review and approval in
conformance with the Engineering Standard No. 115 pertaining to sight distance visibility for the sign. or
wall/fence Idcations.
8. That plans shall be submitted to the Planning. Services Division for review and approval showing
conformance with the current version of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 4028, 436 and 470 pertaining to
parking standards and driveway locatiohs. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained
in conformance with said plans.
9. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for. storage uses.
10: - That no compact parking spaces shall be permitted.
-3- PC2006-
11. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Worl<s
Department, Streets and Sanitation Division and in accordance with approved plans on file with said
Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened. so as not to be readily
identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from
graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum 1-gallon size clinging vines planted on
maximum 3-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans
submitted for building permits.
12. That a plan sheet for solid waste storage and collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval..
13. That the locations for future above-ground utility devices including, but not limited to, electrical
transformers, water backflow devices, gas, communications and cable devices, etc., shall be shown on
plans submitted for building permits, Plans shall also identify the specific screening treatments of each
device (i.e. landscape screening, color of walls, materials, identifiers, access points, etc,) and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the appropriate City departments.
14. That all requests for new water services or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonment of existing water services and fire lines, shall be coordinated through the Water Engineering
Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
15. That all existing water services and fire lines shalt conform to current Water Services Standards
Spec cations. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if
continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The
owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line.
16. That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the front setback area in a manner
fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currenfly installed in a vault
shall be brought up to current standards.. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the
satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the front setback area in a manner fully screened
from all public street and alleys:. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by
Water Engineering and Cross Connection. Control Inspector
17. That since this project has landscaping area exceeding 2,500 square feet, a separate irrigation meter shall
be installed and comply with City Ordinance No. 5349 and Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
18. That prior to submitting water improvement plans, the developer shall submit a water system. master plan,
including a hydraulic distribution network. analysis, for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and
approval. The master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed on-site water system to meet
the project's water demand and fire protection requirements.
19. That water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a
performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City
Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim.
20. That prior to rendering water service, the developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing
water service to the project,
21. -That prior to application for water meters, fire line or submitting the water improvement plans for approval,
the developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Water Engineering Division an estimate of the
__., .. maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information
will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water
demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall occur in accordance
with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules and Regulations,
-4- PC2006-
22. That the property owner/developer shall install street lights on the public streets as required by the
Electrical Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a bond for the installation of the
street lights shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. The street lights shall be installed prior to
occupancy.
23. That the property owner/developer shall provide the City of Anaheim with a public utilities easement to be
determined as electrical design is completed.
24. That any required relocation of City electrical facilities shall be at the developer's expense. Landscape
and/or hardscape screening of all pad mounted equipment shall be required and said equipment shall be
located outside of the easement areas. All electrical facilities that are located on the project boundary
shall be relocated underground and all existing services that are fed from the overhead system shall be
converted to underground at the expense of the developer. The developer shall provide 12Kv duct bank
and substructures for electrical backbone circuits per the electrical system design. The substructures shalt
require a ten (10) foot wide path through. the proposed streets or a ten (10) foot wide easement on the
property. Easements. shall be required on the property for surface mounted switches that are integral to
the electrical circuits. The developer shall install the duct bank, substructres, and provide switch
easements as the new streets are ihstalled. The Public Utilities Department shall specify the duct bank
and easement configurations when a load schedule is available. The backbone circuits shall serve the
electrical systems required for the Individual buildings.
25. That'rf required by the Urban Forestry Division of the Community Services Department, street trees shall
be installed, by the property owner, within the public rights-of-way adjacent to South Street. The size, type
and number of trees shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Urban Forestry Division of the Community
Services Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
26. That it is the developer's responsibility to remove and/or relocate any traffic signal equipment or any other
related item to the traffic signal at the developer's expense if the project requires street widening or
modification of the driveway.
27. That the driveway closest to the railroad track on South Street shall function as a right-in and right-out
access only. The striping on South Street shall be modified to prevent turning movements. Said
informaton shall be spec~cally shown on plans submitted for building permits.
28. That alf air conditioning apparatus and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be properly
shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent residential properties and the public right-of-way.
Such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
29. That all dwelling units shall be assigned. street addresses, and all public and private streets shall be
assigned street names, by the Planning Department.
30. That the applicant shall agree to construct, operate and maintain the: Affordable Units in accordance with a
written "Affordability Agreement" between the applicant and the City, in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney and Community Development Department, duly executed and acknowledged by the applicant
and the Clty, and recorded against the subject property in the official records of Orange County, Cal'rfomia.
The Affordable Units shalt. be subject to the requirements of the Affordability Agreement for a period. of
fifty-five (55) years, beginning on the da#e a certficate of occupancy is granted for the Affordable Units.
31. That the entire property shall be permanently maintained in an ordedy fashion by providing regular
landscape maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffdi within twenty-four (24)-hours
from time of occurence.
32. That any tree planted on-site shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed,
damaged, diseased and/pr dead.
-5- PC2006-
33. That final building elevation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval. Any decision made by the Planning and Community Development Departments regarding said
plans maybe appealed to the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendations item. Such
information shall be spec~cally shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
34. That final landscape and fencing plans for the subject property shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for review and approval. Said plans shall show minimum 24-inch box size trees, shrubs,
groundcover, and clinging vines to be planted in layers. The landscape material selected shall be
appropriate to the width of either the parkway or the planter area. Any decision made by the Planning and
Community Development Departments regarding said plan maybe appealed to the Planning Commission
as a Reports and Recommendations Item. Alt trees shall be properly and professionally maintained by the
property owner to ensure mature, healthy growth. Such information shall be specfically shown on the
plans submitted for building permits.
35. That the approval of Conditional. Use Permit No. 2006-05101 is hereby granted subject to the approval.
of, and finalization of, Reclassification No. 2006-00178, now pending.
36. That the property owner shall submit a letter to the Planning Department requesting termination of
Variance No. 2236 (waiver of minimum height and permitted location of a freestanding sign).
37. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department. marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10, and as wndttioned herein.
38. That prior to issuance of a grading permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution,
whichever occurs first, Condition No. 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further
time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170.
39. That pdor to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this.
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 22,25, 27, 28, 29,
30, 33, 34, 35 and 36, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete
said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 1.8.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
40. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 4, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26 and 37,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with..
41. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request
regarding. any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
42. That timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon
a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent
and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim. Municipal Code and
(iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved
development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared.
invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competentjurisdiction, then this Resolution,.
and. any approvals herein contained, shalt be deemed null and void.
-6- PC2006-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying. all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or
prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges
shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 10, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning
Provisions -General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on July 10, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-7- PC2006-
City of Anaheim
Pb.,1~l~tl~Igl~i~ DE~A~~'li~lEl~l~'
July 10, 2006
Chris Campbell
The Olson Company
3020 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 400
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Following is an excerpt from the minutes of the Anaheim Planning Commission meeting of
July 10, 2006.
3a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION fREADVERTISED)
3b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006-001.75
3c. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
3d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.2006-05101
3e. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16972
Owner: Tom Doyle, 700 South Street LLC, 94 Discovery, Irvine, CA 92618
Agent: Chris Campbell, The Olson Company, 3020 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite
400, Seal Beach, CA 90740
Location: 700 East South Street: Property is approximately 3 acres, having
frontages of 212 feet on the south side of South Street and is located
150 feet east of the centerline of Dakota Street.
Reclassification No. 2D06-00175 -Request reclassification of the property from the
I (Industrial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone, or a less intense
zone
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05101 -Request to construct a 63-unit attached
condominium complex with affordable units and incentive for required improvement of
private street with waiver of sound attenuation for residential developments.
Tentative Tract Mao No. 16972 - To establishes 1-lot, 63-unit airspace attached
residential condominium subdivision.
ACTION: Commissioner XXX offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner XXX and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to to
establish a 1-lot, 63-unit attached single-family residential subdivision and does hereby
approve the Negative Declaration upon a finding that the declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the lead agency; and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together
with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis
of the Initial Study and comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Commissioner XXX offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner XXX and MOTION
CARRIED, that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby determine that the proposed
tentative map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the Anaheim General
Plan, and does therefore approve Tentative Tract Map No. 16972, to establish a 1-lot, Ei3-unit
airspace attached single-family residential subdivision subject to the following conditions:
That the final map shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and the
Orange County Surveyor and then shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder(Subdivision Map Act, Section 66499.40).
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
P.0. Bax 3222
Anaheim, California 92803
vnvw.anaheim.net I TEL (714) 765-5139
2. That the legal property owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a form
approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public improvements in areas
not covered under the Cooperation Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency at the legal property owner's expense. Said
agreement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department,. Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer and then recorded concurrently with
the final tract map.
3. That sanitary sewer and storm drains for this development shall be privately maintained
except the mainline sewer and storm drain within the public streets. Improvement plans
for the sanitary sewer, and private drainage system shall be submitted to the Public
Works Department, Development Services Division. concurrently with. the final map.
4. That the legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim
(Water Engineering Division) an easement twenty (20) feet in width for water service
mains andlor an easement for large meters and other public water facilities.
5. That a maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and approved
by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of
private facilities, including compliance with approved Water Quality Management Plan,
and a maintenance exhibit. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final
map.
6. That approval of this tract map is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. 2006-05101, now pending..
7. That CC&R's recorded on the property shall include provisions requiring that garages
be maintained for vehicle parking in compliance with code.
8. That prior to final tract map approval, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, above-
mentioned, shalt be complied with.
9. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to
the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other
applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or
findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable
ordinance, regulation or requirement.
10. That timing for compliance with conditions of approval. may be amended by the
Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is
established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has
demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved
development.
Sincerely,
Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary
Anaheim Planning Commission
TTM'16972_Excerpt
_ _ ® _ _ _ .
Attachment -Item IVo. 3
PETITIONER'S STATEMENT OF
JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE/CODE WAIVER
(NOT REQUIRED FOR PARKING WAIVER)
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTION: 18.40.090
(A separate statement is required for each Code waiver)
PERTAINING TO: 700 - 708 E. South Street
Sections 18.03.040,030 and 18.12.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code require that before any
variance or Code waiver may be granted by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission,
the following shall be shown:
1. That there aze special circumstances applicable to the property, including size,. shape,
topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical
zoning classification in the vicinity; and
2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the
property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the
vicinity.
1n order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning. Administrator
or Planning Commission to arrive at a decision, please answer each of the following questions
regazding the property for which a variance is sought, fully and as completely as possible. If you
need additional space, you may attach additional pages.
I. Are there special circumstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings? X Yes _ No.
If your answer is "Yes," describe the special circumstances: The property is located within 600
Fee[ of a railroad. The Olson Company has conducted'a noise study and based on the study will
mitigate the noise created by the railroad. The Olson Company will mitigate the noise by
Furthermore, the site elan has been desired to place ffie homes as faz away from the railroad line
as possible.
2. Are the special circumstances Utat apply to the property different from other properties in the
vicinity which aze in the same zone as your property? X Yes _ No
If your answer is "yes," describe how the property is different: The property is located adjacent
to an active raihoad line.
3. Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently
enjoyed by neighboring properties located within the same zone? X Yes No
If your answer if "yes;' describe the special circumstances: The property is located adiacent to an
active railroad line.
4. Were the special circumstances created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or
previous property owners)? X Yes _ No
EXPLAIN The railroad tracks were constructed outside the control of the property owner and
the previous property owners
The sole purpose of any variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no
variance or Code waiver shall be approved which would have the effect of granting a special
privilege not shazed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which is not otherwise
expressly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property. Use variances aze not.
permitted.
of Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNARIANCE NO.
- - -® _ _.
l __ __
C °-- - --- ---
r
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 4
4a. _ CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 330
(PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED) (Motion for Continuance)
4b. .ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2006-00049
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This proposed Zoning Code Amendment would apply Citywide.
REQUEST:
(2) This is aCity-initiated (Planning Department) request for approval to amend Chapter 18.52
(Density Bonus) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to reflect current California State Government
Code Sections 65915 through 65918, Density Bonuses and Other Incentives, and to request
:approval of a Density Bonus Implementation Regulations document to be referenced in
Chapter 18.52.
.BACKGROUND:
(3) The California State Government Code Sections 65915 through 65918, Density Bonuses and
Otherlncentves; requires Iccal governments to provide density bonuses, modified parking
standards, and incentives and condessions to housing developmehts of five units or more if
they include a specified. percentage of affordable units or senior citizen housing. These Code
Sections were updated in 2004 and 2005 by Senate Bills 1818 and 435 (respectively). As
such; Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonuses) of the Anaheim Municipal Code is proposed to be
updated to reflect the new State provisions.
(4) Staff requests a continuance of this request to complete final refinements to the proposed
.code amendment.
RECOMMENDATION:
(5) That the Planning Commission, by motion, continue this item to the July 24, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
SR-ZCA2006-000491s 7-10-06 coot
Page i
Item No.
I
APPLIANCE SHOP
._~___1 _~_.
RCL fi6.67.14
RCL 53-54-7
VAR 2673.
VAR 2483
MEDICAL CLINIC
t UP 2001-0499 I
VAR 12fi3 SI
SERVICE
STATION
I
~
s7s
t1J C-G
~ RCL 55-56-29
Z CUP 3743
CUP 1613
W RESTAURANT
Q C-G
Q R
9
CUP 2399
96
CUP 29
DRIVE-THRU
RESTAURANT
Q
r n~L 5s-54-i
TALL INDUSTF
FIRMS
1
RCL 53-54-7
RCL
FIRMS
I
66417-14
RM-4
RCL 85-66.12
RCL 55-56-29
CUP 598
APARTMENTS
RCL 63-64-26
RCL 55-56-30
LA PALMA AVENUE
-®;~ 160' -~I
RCL
I
RCL fi6{~.7-14
RCL 53-54-7
CUP 2357
GUP 22D1
CUP 1748
SMALL INDUSTRIAL
FIRMS
I
RCL 6fi-67-14
RCL 53-54--~
ADJ 0030
MAGNETIC
METALS COR
`~ CUP 136 RM-4
VAR 30795 RCL 71-72-12(1) d^rce
VAR 22 6 VAR 2389 m ~ =~
- ~' _ VAR 2288 ^~ m
- `- LA PALMA WOODS Vu_=
' r `- <-x APARTMENTS ~ a ri ~
T 56 DU
CU
689 "U~
CUP 3538 ~ U
CUP 3924
~
N _
CUP 1833
~
>
~
CUP 136 p
~
(RCL SS
5830) ~
CHURCHAND T
ACACIAWOOD CUP 424
SCHOOL CHURCH
VAR 2170 ''r ;;''>;,, ~.
CUP 486 ~
6 ak "e$
3-
~ ~ s~~e
a~Y `$<
R 1552
R ma RS-2 RS-2
1 DU EACH ~
1 DU EACH
V1
U
~ V Z =
N O N V
~
y a a rn
~ y
z =
= GREENBRIER AVE
\ RS-2
1DU EP
''a
RS-2
1 0U EA H
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05084
Requested By: THE CHURCH IN ANAHEIM
2530 West La Palma Avenue
6I
1DDe1
'~ Subject Property
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: 1" = 200'
Q.S. No. 25
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05084
Requested By: THE CHURCH IN ANAHEIM
2530 West La Palma Avenue
iooe~
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
Juty 10, 2006
It N 5
em o.
5a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION {Motion)
5b. .WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT (Motion)
5c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05084 ;(Resolution)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly-shaped, 2.2-acre property has a frontage df 180 feet on he south side of
La Palma Avenue, a maximum depth of 533 feet and is located 676 feet east of the
centerline of Magnolia Avenue (2530 West La Palma Avenue - Acaciawood School).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a Conditional use Permit uhderauthority of Code
Section No. 18.14.030.040.0403 (Educational Institutions-General) to retain and expand an
existing. private school which shares the site with an existing church, to permit grades 1
through 7 town existing schodl focgrades 8 through 12 with waiver of the following:
:SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces
' 172 required; 61 proposed)
BACKGROUND:
{3) The property is developed with a private school that shares the use of existing buildings
and `parking areas with a church; however the school is not a part of the church. The
property is zoned T (Transition) and the General Pian designates this site for Residential
Low Density lahd uses. The General Plan designates surrounding properties'as follows: o
south for Low Density Residential land uses,#o the east for Low Density and Medium
Density Residential land uses,: to the north foFlndustrial and Medium Density Residential
land uses and to the west for Medium Density Residential land uses.
PREVIOUS ZONING ACTIONS:
(4) The following zoning actions pertain to this property:
a) .Conditional Use Permit No. 3536 (to permit a private educational facility (8`h grade
through 12'~ grade) in conjunction with an existing:church and preschool was
approved by the Planning Commission on September 9, 1992. On October 17,.1994,
an amendment to previous exhibits and to a condition of approval pertaining to the
maximum permitted student enrollment,(with sparking waiver) was approved by the
Planning Commission. This entitlement would be replaced by this request and can
be terminated.
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 3424 (to permit apre-school in an existing church. and
the construction df two 1,492-square foot modular housing units for pastor's quarters
with waiver of minimum required yard,'minimum number of parking spaces and
maximum structural height) was granted by the Plannirig Commission on July 1,
1991. This entitlement is no longer necessary and can be terminated.
c)' Conditional Us Permit No. 1833 (to permit the expansion ofchurch offices, with
'waiver of maximum structural;height; and minimum rear yard setback) was approved
by the Planning'Commission on May22, 1978.
d) Variance No. 2296 (to waiver permitted uses, minimum number of parking spaces
and maximum building height to permitsubdivision of an existing'parcel into two lots
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 5
and construction of church executive office) was approved by the City Council on
December 28, 1971.
e) Conditional. Use Permit No. 136 (to permit the construction of a church) was
approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1961:'
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(5) The applicantproposes to retain and expand and (by adding grades 1 through 7) an
existing private school that operates independently, but shares the building. with an existing
church. This case is the result of a Fire Department inspection to modify a change of
occupancy in the buildings to include classroom use. The school has been operating with
grades 3 through,12 since dhe school relocated to the site in February 2001.
(6) The site plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates five (5) existing buildings on-site that total :19,849
square feet: The site plan and floor plans.(Exhibit Nos. 1 through 8) indicate buildings one
and five are shared between the school and the existing church, buildings two and three
are exclusively used by the school and building four,is exclusively used by the church.
There is no hew construction proposed. The site plan further indicates existing fencing
around all interiorpropertyiines. The square footage of uses is as follows:
9tUdiq ~ ~~ :S ware 6oota a ~~. Uses'.:
Building 1 -.Church and Scheol ': 7,820 Church offices, meeting conference
room,:classrooms (3"'ao 12~' grade),
stora e
Buildin 2-.School 6,000 Classrooms,tibra ,office
Buildin 3-School 1 259 r -Grades 1 and 2
Buildin 4-:Church ( 1358 Twomeetin rooms
Building 5 -Church and School 3,412 Assembly hall, faculty room, kitchen
and stora e
~UIOt~IiIC~ '(
~@S~ ~(8V3ti(O17
Y .~
~~~~ K /
,, xi~ ~p~
~ t~l~
4` ~~ J
~'~~,
~.
~~~ ~~~
~ ~~ ~~ ~~
~' fz "zrd ~`.~/~ ~
Photo of existing Building 1 along,La Palma Ave.
(7) Vehicular access to the site is provided via two driveways from La Palma. Avenue. The site
plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates an existing wrought,iron fence with a rolling gate separating
the northern and southern parking lots.: Staff has determined that there. are a total of 61
_. existing useable on-site parking spaces. `:.The site.plan indicates 28 spaces within the
northern parking lot and 99 parking spaces within the southern parking lot however, 66 of
the parking spaces within the southern.parking lot are not striped in compliance with city
:'standards as confirmed by a site visit by the City's traffic consultant. The area is currently
marked far outside school activities such as basketball, volleyball and foursquare as shown
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
.Item No. 5
in the aerial below. In addition, 6 parking spaces are currently occupied by storage
containers (as shown in the photo below) and 16 spaces do not have proper back-up due
to the outdoor school activities. Only 33 striped parking spaces meet code for the southern
parking lot. Outdoor storage is not permitted. within the T zone, therefore they would need
to be removed and 6 additional parking spaces wouldbe available for a total of 67 parking
paces. Code{equires 172 spaces based on the following:
Use Square Feet Code Parking R®quirement;(per 1,000 s.f.) .Parking Required
s.f.
Assembly area (which 3,412 29 spaces per 1,000 square feet of assembly 99
includes church and 670 ! area gr D.333 space per fixed seat whichever is 19
school 4,082 s.f. total rester 118 total
Kitchen within assembly Occupancy i' Two-hundredths (.02) space per person for the
area maximum capacity figure of the assembly area 6
Bldg. 5 300 maximum determined by the Fire Departrnent 1
Bld . 1 49 maximum 7
Storage 420 s.f. 1.55 spaces per1,000 square feet 1
.Office (which includes 945 s.f. 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet 4
church and school
Elementary Classrooms B classrooms c 1 space per classrooM plus 1 space per teacher 20
6,660 s.f. 12
High School 60 students: 1 space per every 6 students plus t space per 22
6,000 s.f. teacher 12
Hallways restrooms 1;742 s.f. N/A N/A
•Iibra Sunda school
Total square footage 19,849 s.f. Total paces required 172
' Code does not require any parking for fhe accessory Sunday school Gassrooms, restrooms. lobbies or hallvravs
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 5
SW ~orr~er
~81dg3
F~ ~ ~ ~~
~y~ w r
I N Ah^ ^y~ ~ ta~'.~s."i" ../Y~ L ~E 'J ^.y~~''w'r
r:~~~~ s~~~t~~~f~''-mom ~~~~ "n~,r'w.
`Y
(9) The applicant has submitted the attached letter of operation and. project description that
`indicates the existing church operates as follows:
Office: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., Monday through Friday
Evenings: 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Weekendsi 9 a.m. to 12 p.mzSaturday, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Sunday
The school operates 7:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m:, Monday through Friday, with a maximum
enrollment of 135 students. The parking study evaluates thesite for maximum enrollment,
:but the school currently has 67 students. '
(10) No signagepians were submitted with this application and the applicant has not proposed
any additional slgnage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(11) Staff has reviewed theproposal to retain and expand an existing private school in
conjunction with an existing church and the Initial Study (a copy'of which is available for
review in the Planning 17epartment) and finds no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends that a Negative Declaration be approved upon a finding by he
Commission'thattha declaration reflects the independentjudgment of the lead agency; and
that it has considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments
received during the public review process and further finding on3he basis of the Initial
.Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project wilt
• have a significant effect on the environment.
EVALUATION:
(12) Schools are,permitted in the T (Transition) zone subject to a conditional use permit. The
proposed school expansion would continue to operate at the site during times when the
church has minimal office activities in a manner, and at times that are compatible with the
existing chinch operation.
(13) .The waiver pertains to the minimum .number of parking spaces. Code requires a minimum
of 172 spaces for the church and school and plans indicate 61 existing spaces on-site. A
~" " parking study dated May 31, 2006, was conducted by the City's' independent parking and
`traffic consultant which determined that the school provides sufFcient parking for its daily
uses and the actual parking demand is less than the number of parking spaces existing on
the site due to the restrictions placed on the students (only juniors and seniors are allowed
Page 4
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 5
to drive to school), and carpooling that occurs. Also, the church does not have concurrent
services During the hours that the school is in session. The actual. observed parking
demand was 27 spaces. When factored up to account for an;eventuat increase in
enrollment, he fiorecasted parking demand is 56.4The forecasted parking tlemand at build-
out can be accommodated within the 61 actual, marked, and available parking spaces.
::Based upon the analysis providedby the applicant and upon the recommendation of the
City's independent Traffic Consultant, staff recommends approval of this waivecbased on
the following findings:
°(a) ?hat the waiver, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such spaces
:necessary to accommodate all vehiclesattributable to such use under the normal
and reasonable foreseeable conditions of operation of such use.
The Acaciawood school site provides adequate parking on-site for its daily school
uses as well as the uses for the church office in Building 1, provided that there are
no concurrent church service and school assemblies.
(b) That the waiver, under the condtions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand
and competition for parking spaces upon the,public streets in the immediate. vicinity
of the. proposed use.
The Acaciawood School provides adequate parking on-site to meet its observed
.parking demand. No off-site parking along thepublic street will be needed. When
infrequent special assemblies are scheduled, arrangements to secure additional
parking, if necessary will be made with the adjacent church property to the west.
No on-street parking will be needed for the school use.
(c) That the waiver, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand
for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use.
The Acaciawood School provides sufficient parking for its'daily uses, and no
overFlow parking will be occurring upon adjacent. private property within the vicinity.
- For inftequent schoolassemblies, theschool will make arrahgements with the
adjacent church to provide additional parking, fit is anticipated to be needed.
(d) <That the waiver, under the conditions fmposed, will not increase trafkc congestion
within he bff-street parking areas ortots provided for such use.
The Acaciawood School provides. sufficient parking for its daily uses, Because the
supply of parking spaces is`adequate for the anticipated parking demand, no
congestion within the parking lots'is expected. The schooFstaff also monitors the
drop=off and pick-up procedures, such that;he teachers are able to direct. vehicles
through the site to avoid any queuing of vehicles onto La Palma Avenue.
(e) That the waiver, undecthe conditions. imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to
or egress #rom adjacent properties upon the public streets in the fmmediate vicinity
of the proposed use.
The Acaciawood School traffic will not block any adjacent driveways. School staff will
direct traffic to avoid any vehicles queuing onto La Palma Avenue in the vicinity of
.adjacent driveways "
Page 5
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 5
(14) Based on site inspections and analysis of the submitted information, the parking proposed
and drop-off area is adequate for the proposed use.. During special events and large
assemblies at which parents and chool staff would be present, dhe City's traffic consultant
recommends that the principal should make arrangements with the adjacent church for
overtlow parking, if the need should arise.: in addition, the school and church that share
buildings at 2528 and 2530 West La Palma Avenue should coordinate any assemblies or
ervices that are held during the week, such that they arefiot concurrent:
(15) The subject request to permit the expansion of the school is compatible with the existing
church, and the proposed expansion will not negatively impact the adjacent uses as
evidencetl by the lack bf Community Preservation violations over the last two years. School
,enrollment will be tmited to 135 students which can. be accommodated by the 61 marked
parking spaces as demonstrated in the parking study prepared by the City's independent
Traffic Consultant. Therefore, staff is supportive of this request to allow the expansion of the
school.
FINDINGS:
(16) ..Section .18.42.110 of the parking code sets forth the following findings which are required to
be made before a parking waiver is approved.. by the Planning Commission:
(a) That the waiver,. under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street
:parking spaces to be;provided torsuch use than he numbe[ofsuch spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and
reasonable foreseeable conditions of operation of such use.
(b) That the waiver, under the,conditions imposed, if any, wiq not increase the demand
and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use.
(c) That the waiver, under the conditions. imposed, if any, will not increase the demand for
parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the
;proposed use.
(d) That the waiver, undecthe conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion
:within the off-street parking areas or lots: provided for such use.
(e) That the waiver,Lnder the,conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or
egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
..proposed use.
Unless conditions to the contrary are expressly imposed upon the granting of any waiver
pursuant to this sectiom, thegranting of the waivershall be deemed,contingentnpon
operation of the proposed use in conformance with the assumptions relating to the operation
.and intensity of the use as contained in the Parking Demand Study that formed the basis for
;approval of the waiver. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise deviating from any of
the assumptions as contained in the Parking Demand Study shall be deemed a violation of
;the express conditions imposed upon the waiver, which shall subject the waiver to
.revocation or modification pursuant to the provisions of Section:18.60.200 (City-Initiated
Revocation or Modification of Permits).
Page 6
[ _
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 206
Item No. S
(17) Before the Commissiongrants any conditional use permit, it must. make a fiinding of fact. that
the evidence presented shows that all of the following. conditions exist:
(a) .That the use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the
.Zoning Code, or is an unlisted use as defrned in Subsection .030 (Unlisted Uses
Permitted) of Section 18.66.040 (Approval Authority);
(b) That the use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which. it is proposed to be located;
(c) That the size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
or to the health and safety;
(d) .That the traffic generated by the use will. not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to thehealth and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
RECOMMENDATION:
(18) Staff recommends that,. unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the evidence
presented in this staff report, and oral and written. evidence presented at the public hearing,
that the Planning Commission aborove the applicant's request by taking the following
actions:
(a) By motion, aoorove a CEQA Negative Declaration for the project.
(b) By motion, aoorove the waiver of minimum number of parking spaces 172
.required; 61 proposed) based on the findings contained in the parking study and
summarized in this report.
(c) By resolution., aoorove Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05084 to retain and
expand an existing private school which shares the site with an existing church., to
permit grades 1 through 7 to an existing school for grades 8 through 12, by
adopting the attached resolution including the findings and conditions contained
.therein.
Page 7
[®RAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05084 BE GRANTED
(2530 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARCEL 1 AND 2 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on July 10, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said. proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and. recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
L That the proposed request to retatn and expand an existing private school which shares the
site with an existing church, to permit grades 1 through 7 to an existing school for grades 8 through 12 is
properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.14.030.040.0403 (Educational Institutions-General) with. the following waiver:
SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum. number of oarkina spaces
172 required; 61 proposed)
2. That the parking waiver is hereby approved based upon. a parking analysis dated May 31,
2006, prepared by the City's Independent Traffic Engineer providing evidence that adequate parking exists
on the property to retain and expand an existing private school in conjunction-with an existing church.
3: That the parking waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street
parking spaces to be provided for the school expansion and church operations than. the number of such
spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such uses under the normal and reasonable
foreseeable conditions of operation.
4. That the parking waiver, under the conditions imposed, if any,. will not increase traffic
congestion and will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in
the immediate vicinity of the use because the supply of parking spaces is adequate for the anticipated
parking demand and no congestion within the parking lots is expected. The school staff also monitors the
drop-off and pick-up procedures, such that the teachers are able to direct vehicles through the site to avoid
any queuing of vehicles onto La Palma Avenue.
5. That the parking waiver, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and
competition forparking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use
because as indicated in the parking study, adequate parking to accommodate the anticipated peak parking
demand for the church and private school will be provided on-site.
6. That the parking waiver, under the conditions imposed if any, will not impede vehicular
ingress to or egress from. adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
Cr\PC2006- -1- PC2006-
proposed use because the project site is physically separated from adjacent private properties. Furthermore,
it has been determined by the parking study that adequate on-site queuing and parking are being provided.
7. That the use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development
of the area in which it is proposed to be located as the parking study has demonstrated that the site can
accommodate the combined uses on-site and a portion of the proposed use is already operating in a manner
that is not adversely affecting adjoining land uses;.
8. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as evidenced by the lack of
Community Preservation complaints for the existing operation of the church and school.
9. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
10. That the size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed
use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or the health and. safety.
t 1. That "' indicated them presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition. to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Planning Commission
has reviewed the proposal and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the
declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the
basis of the initial. study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon. the following conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
heath and safety of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
That the school and church. shall operate consistent with assumptions contained in the approved
parking study. If at any such time the operational characteristics of the church change, a detailed
description of the operational changes shall be submitted for review by the City's Traffic and Parking
Consultant to determine if the changes would cause feweroff-street parking spaces to be provided
than required to serve the activities on the property. If ft is determined the expected demand is greater
than the spaces provided on site, an application for modification of the conditional use permit shall be
submitted to the Planning Services Division for approval by the Planning Commission.
2. That any additional signs shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division for review and approval.
Any decision by staff regarding signs may be appealed to the Planning Commission as a "Report and
Recommendation' item.
3. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provisions of
regular landscaping maintenance,. removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four
(24) hours from time of occurrence.
4. That drop-off vehicles shall be routed through the site and out via the easterly drive aisle.
5. That the school shall be responsible for securing overFlow parking. on adjacent property for large
assemblies in which parents are invited and all teachers are present on campus together.
-2- PC2006-
6. That the school shall be responsible for coordinating with the church to ensure that the school and
church shall not hold assemblies or services concurrently during the week.
7. That the property owner shall submit a letter requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No.
3538 (to permit a private educational facility (81h grade through 12'h grade) in conjunction with an
existing church) and Conditional Use Permit No. 3424 (to permit apse-school in an existing church and
the construction of two 1,492-square foot modular housing units for pastor's quarters with waiver of
minimum required yard, minimum number of parking spaces and maximum. structural height) to the
Planning Department.
8. That an automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the
Fire Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
9. That a fire alarm system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the Fire
Department. Said information. shall be specifically shown. on plans submitted for building permits.
10. That four (4) foot high address numbers shall be displayed on the roof of the building in contrasting
color to the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible to adjacent and nearby streets or
properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted to the Police Department,.
Community Services Division, for review and approval
11. That an Emergency Listing Gard, Form ADP-281 shall be completed and submitted in a completed
form to the Anaheim Police Department.
12. That an alarm system (silent or audible) shall be installed. Said information shall be specifically shown
on plans submitted for building permits.
13. That gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner, which may
adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public street. Installation of any new gates shall
conform to the Engineering Standard Plan No. 475 and shall be subject to the review and approval of
the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to issuance of a building permit.
14. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for his review and
approval in conformance with the Engineering Standard No. 115 pertaining to sight distance visibility
for any new sign or wall/fence location.
15. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department Exhibit Nos. 1 through 8 and as conditioned herein..
16. That the maximum permitted enrollment of students shall be 135.
17. That the unpermitted storage containers located in the southern parking lot shall be removed within
thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution.
18. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition. Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with.. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.60.1.70 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
19. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 11, 15 and 17, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with.
20. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
-3- PC2006-
regulations. Approval. does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
21. That timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon
a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent
and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and
(iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved
development,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared
invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or
prior to the commencement of the activity or issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs
first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of
the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 10, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning
Provisions -General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution. in the event of an appeal
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on July 10, 2006, by the following vote of the. members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC2006-
Attachment -Item No. 5
25301M. La Palma Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92801
E-mall: office(~awschool.ora
April 7,.2008
Ms. Della Herrick
City of Anaheim
Anaheim Planning and Zoning
225 S. Philadelphia
Anaheim, CA 92805
~~~~'~~~ sOS Phone: (714) 995-1800
q°; o Fax: (794) 995-4023
V
40 ~ IN OH~P~pO
k ~N 61A~~~
Change of Occupancy: School Expansion Grades 1-7
Letterpf Church in Anaheim Operation
Prefile No. 2005.00018
Dear Ms. Herrick:
This letter is part of the conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by Acaciawood
School (AWS) requesting the expansion of the school. AWS is a college prep academy that
" will mark its 10-year.annivecsary in June 2006.. AWS is accredited for grades 2 to 12, and
relocated to the present site in February 2001.
Described heieiri are operations for the church in Anaheim which is the owner of the
property and which shares the property with Acaciawood School.
The school uses the property Monday to Fridays, from approximately 7:30 am to 3:45 pm
Church in Anaheim Operation
Business Office
(Two persons)
College Meeting
Service Breakfast
Lord's Table Meeting
Message Meeting
Monday to Friday
9amto12pm
Friday
7:30 pm to 10 pm
Saturday
9amto12pm
Sunday
10 am to 11 am
Sunday
11 am to 12 pm
If you have any questions regarding this document, please contact me.
_.. ,
Respectively yours,
ACACIAWOOD SCHOOL...... ,
__..
c/ Gc~-~ ~'i J
Michio Miyake
Principal
2530 W. La Palma Avenue p*~'oo° 8~~ Phone: (7t4) 995-1800
Anaheim, CA 92801 Q~, o Fax: (714) 995-4023
E-mail: office(o~awschool.ora
4
iiOH~ IN TII~PI'PG
~H IN a N.~O~
March 23, 2005
Ms. Della Herrick
City of Anaheim
Anaheim Planning and Zoning
225 S. Philadelphia
Anaheim, CA 92805
Change of Occupancy: School Expansion Grades 1-7
letter of School Operation
Prefile No. 2005-00018
Dear Ms. Herrick:
This letter is part of the conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by Acaciawood
School (AWS) requesting the expansion of the school. AWS is a college prep academy that
will mark its 10-year anniversary in June 2006. AWS is accredited for grades 2 to 12, and
relocated.to the present site in February 2001.
Described hereinare operations for its elementary school, grades 3 to 6, located on fhe
second. floocof Building 1, future grades 1-2 to be located in Building 3 as shown on the Site
Plan A-1, and 7a' grade. Grades 1 and 2 will meet on the around floor and. grades 3 to 7
meet primarily on the second floor. An existing CUP on the property allows for the instruction
of grades B-12 only. Therefore, another CUP to expand the operation of the school at the.
property is required. No new construction is required for the school expansion except an
existing fenced play area adjacent to Building 2 will be upgraded with new playground
equipment and will be enlarged
Site Description
There are two land parcels at the 2..05 acre site owned by the church in Anaheim. There are
five buildings on the site,. ail wood framed with stucco construction (V-1 hr). Two buildings
are two-story structures while the three others are single level structures. The property is
bordered on three sides by single family and multi-family dwellings. The north side of the
property fronts La Palma Avenue. (See Site Plan Sheet A-1). The site is completely
developed with north and south asphalt parking lots, some lawn areas, perimeter drive with
entrance and exit at La Palma Avenue, fenced play area, and five buildings. Six-foot high
concrete block walls secure the site on three sides except the north side where there is a
wrought iron fence.
Building Descriptions
Building 1 (two-story) Usage is shared with church and school. The first floor is only used by
_ the church and consists of church offices, meeting room, conference room, restrooms, a
'small kitchen, and two storage closets. The building bears the address of 2528 West La
Palma Avenue. The second floor of the building is used only by the school, and is the
area where grades 3-7 will be instructed and is one of two areas where a new CUP is
required.
Acaciawood School Expansion
Letter of Operation
Page 2
Building 2 (two-story) is leased exclusively by Acaciawood School (AWS) from the church.
Classrooms, school office, restrooms, storage room, computer server room, and reference
library are located in Building 2 bearing the. address 2530 West La Palma. High school and
junior high students use this building.
Building 3 (single-story) is the second area affected by the expansion of the school.
and new CUP. Grades 1 and 2 will be instructed in the two rooms of the building which is
used exclusively by the school..
Building 4 contains two meetings rooms for church use only.
Building 5 is a large assembly hall with raised stage, faculty room, kitchen, restrooms, and
storage space. This. building is shared by the schooP and church.
See Site Plan A=1 attached and Table 1 herein for a summary of the building areas and
usage.
Church in Anaheim Operation
The church in Anaheim. is a registered Calffornia non-profit corporation, that is an
independent entity with its own board, completely unrelated to the school. The
church in Anaheim has three meeting halls, with the La Palma Avenue hall being the
intermediate-size one among the three halls.
The church ministry concentrates on numerous home meetings during the week and
only large meetings are held on Sunday momtngs at its large assembly halls. The
Sunday meetings begin with alt languages meeting in Building 5 for the first hour..
During. the last hour, the congregation breaks. out into four smaller meetings in
Buildings 1, 4, and 5. College-age meetings are held in Building 1 on Friday evenings
and breakfast meetings are held, on Saturdays in Building 1 and 5. The church has
nursery on Sundays for their members in Building 1.
Because of the meeting practices of the church, the church and school use of the
site are mutually exclusive and never coincide. The lease agreement explicitly states
that the school. can only use the site during the weekdays, Monday to Friday. The
lease allows an occasional use by the school at times outside of these regular
periods provided the school obtains permission from the church.
General School Operation
The school day is the same for all the students on the site except for seniors that leave early
because they have fewer classes. The regular day begins at 8:10 am and ends at 3:10 pm,
Monday to Friday. All students are required to leave campus by 3:25 pm unless they have
school business, and there is no after school day care proposed. Elementary teachers
park and office staff park in the north parking lot and all other teachers. park in the south lot.
Seniors that drive at lunch park in the north lot and all others are required to park in the
south lot. Ali students commute back and forth to school using private vehicles, no bus or
van service is planned for this purpose.
Acaciawood School Eicpansion
Letter of Operation
Page 3
The location marked with a "1" inside a hexagon on Site Plan. A-1 is where children are
currently dropped off. Traffic enters the north lot from La Palma Avenue and circles around
the lot.counter clockwise toward the east and exits out of the north lot making a right turn.
For the school expansion and CUP, the drop off/pick up of students and exit out of the
property will be changed. Vehicles will enter the north tot and proceed south to the new drop
off/pick up location. designated by "2". All. vehicles will exit using the east alley and a teacher
direct cars to turn right onto La Palma Avenue.
Teachers. current take turns to serve as parking attendant during school "rush hours" (arrival
and dismissal) to keep traffic flowing safely. Cars that must wait for children will be directed
to park in the south parking lot. Vehicles will not be allowed to stop at any point in the
perimeter drive. This will prevent vehicle stacking to occur. on La Palma Avenue.
The elementary students use the west stairs and enter Building 1 primarily through. the glass
double door located on fhe west side of the building. The door on the south side of Building 1
is occasionally used by the students when they return from lunch. The north exterior door is
not used except as an emergency escape route for fires and other disasters.
At present there are 23 students in grades 3 to 6, but a maximum enrollment based on a
student teacher ratio of 15:1 could possibly equate to 90 students in grades 1 to 6. Two full
time teachers, three part time teachers, and two teacher aides provide instruction in the
elementary school. In the future, when first and second grade are added, there will be six
elementary teachers in the elementary school.
A fenced off play area, adjacent to Building 2 and 3, consisting of swings and steel rings is
rarely used by the elementary students because the site is not suitable for them to use. The
school is fundraising now to add new equipment and sawdust to make the play area more
"user friendly" for the students by Fall 2006.
The elementary school has no free recess time. Instead the students have a daily recess
time consisting of organized games under the instruction of a teacher and two teaching
assistants at the south parking lot. The lot is striped for basketball, volleyball, four-square,
dodge ball, and similar games. The students eat lunch at tables in an outside picnic area
beneath the west overhang of Building 5 while under the careful eyes of two adults..
The elementary students leave Building 1 and assemble in Building 5 (auditorium) for their
music classes on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The computer lab for the school is
located on the ground floor of Building 2. Beginning in April 2005, the elementary school will
use the computer lab for an hour on Tuesdays and Thursdays. At dismissal time each day,
the children are escorted down the west stairs from Building 1 to loading zone "1" as stated
earlier. During afternoon dismissal, the parking lot traffic is directed by a teacher to flow in
two, one-way, concentric circles until the students are picked up. At approximately 3:30 pm,
students that have not been picked up go upstairs to wait for their ride in a room designated
as a study half.
-'" Upper School Desceiption
Acaciawood School Expansion
Letter of Operation
Page 4
The upper school (7 to 12 grade) now consists of 64 students, but has a potential maximum
enrollment of 90 students based on a quota of 15 students per grade. There are six full time
teachers and 16 part time teachers that provide instruction for the upper school.. Only seniors
and juniors are allowed to drive to school., but very few of them own their personal vehicles
so at present only seven students regularly drive to school. The majority of the students are
dropped off/picked up by their parents. The seniors park in the north parking lot and juniors
park in the south lot. Only the seniors have off campus privileges at lunch time so there is
minimal traffic in and out of the parking lot during the day. PE is held every Friday using the
south parking lot during the last period of the day. All PE students shower at home.
Special School Functions
Six times a year, the school holds 300-person assemblies in Building 5, three of which are
during the evening from about 7:00 to 9:00 pm. The two other assemblies are during the
regular school day. The high school sports program, consisting of girls' volleyball and boys'
basketball, is conducted using gymnasiums located off site. The annual high school
graduation is also held off-site at a rented. facility.
The typical school year runs from the last week of August to the first week of June.
During one month in the summer, there is a special English language day camp for
approximately 50 foreign students. Activities run Monday thr9ugh Friday, from. 8:30
am to 4:00 pm.
If you have any questions regarding this document, please contact me.
Respectively yours,
ACACIAWOOD SCHOOL
Michio Miyake
Principal
_ _ r .. _
f _
/Attachment - Item No. 5
PARKING STUDY
~~~
2528 and 2530 W. La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA
Prepazed for:
Prepared by:
Rafq
SS®CI~$~'So'IiCe
May 31, 2006
c
Table of Contents
Section Page
I. Introduction 1
II. Project Location 1
III. Site Description 1
a. Existing Site 1
Site Plan 2
Site Photo 3
b. Proposed Site 4
c. Chazacteristics 4
N. Site Uses 4
V. Pazking Requirements 5
VI. Site Pazlcing Counts 6
VII. Methodology of Study 6
VIII. Findings 7
1X. Recommendations and Conclusions 8
Acaciawood School Pazking Study Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
C ~ e _~..m _®_ __e
I. Introduction
The Acaciawood School is a private school that shazes the use of buildings and pazking azeas
with a church. The school has submitted a conditional use permit (CUP) to expand its operations
to include additional grades. The current CUP is for grades 8-12. The school has. approximately
87 students in grades 3-12. The purpose of this pazking study is to evaluate the parking needs of
the school for an ultimate expansion to 180 students at build-out conditions.
II. Project Location
The site is located at 2528 and 2530 W. La Palma Avenue in Anaheim. It is located one block
east of the intersection of W. La Palma Avenue/N. Magnolia Avenue, and is less than one mile
from N. Magnolia Avenue at Interstate 5 freeway.
III. Site Description
a. Existing Site
There are five existing buildings on the site that will remain. A site plan is included on page 2.
The uses, and sizes of the individual buildings aze as follows:
Building Square
Feet Uses
Buildin 1 7,820 Church of&ces, meetn ,conference room, classrooms, stora e
Buildin 2 6,000 Classrooms, libra ,office
Buildin 3 1,259 !Grades 1 and 2
Buildin 4 1,259 Two meetin rooms
Buildin 5 3,412 Assembl Hall, Facul room, Kitchen, Stora e
There are two existing access driveways on La Palma Avenue. There is a continuous, two-way
left tom lane along La Palma Avenue for left toms into and out of the site. The westerly
driveway serves as a full access to the northerly pazking lot.
The northerly pazking lot is used for the morning drop-off. School staff monitors the site
circulation. A morning uniform inspection. is also performed during the drop-off period, as the
school maintains a strict dress code. Vehicles pazked in the northerly pazking lot aze those
driven by elementary school teachers, some high school seniors, office staff and two church
office workers. The northerly pazking lot contains 28 pazking spaces.
Acaciawood School Parking Study 1
ltafiq & Associates, Ina.
Acaciawood School Site Pla®
anuany ew~ed e~
~luc
f
o ~~ ~
~ <<
0 oa
2 N
m ~~~2
m
rv ~~
~pp~~~p~
G C83~~
yyU~ Gdf F@
O ~~~
~:~~
~I '=~
~~
a
a m.~
~~ ~inmi7~
~~ ~~~~
~~~N ~~n19 b1
9 b~~a%~9
m m' ~' mmm
~-• - -- ----Wtl '- -~-- - -T---
a WPww'i ~
E ~ ~`
l `~ ~ I~
5 ~ ~ 'i
'4 ? ui I ~ w
h~ I G
.Q m _ 2 ~ (J
W s ~ W
V f
~~~
a V ~
V
...I __ - ate ~ C
i ~ E
F$ ~ ~~ ~ °m
~ ~~ $ W~ gJt
Q ~ ;s
~' '6
e
1 v~ j
'~ N GAS ~
p ~ ~ ~L~
J Z
m
~~ ~~ ,b
~I bFS ~~
w'
~ s<
m ~ II
2 i[
s ~
~ ~b e a =m p i
'~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
;~ ~
-~
TT.. J
•~ s -~ a ~ ~g,~
q Y
a ~~~
~ ~~i<m
$i-
m i ~:LL.LI.~LL~IL~JJ.1J::
O ~~
`a
Acaciawood School Pazlting Study 2
}tafiq & Associates, Inc.
l -- __ e
r
The southerly pazking lot is accessed through a rolling gate along the westerly drive aisle from
the northerly parking lot. This drive aisle is one-way, southbound. Vehicles then exit the
southerly parking lot via aone-way drive aisle, northbound to the easterly site access onto La
Palma Avenue. The high school teachers, junior and senior students pazlc in the southerly
parking lot. The southerly parking lot per the site plan contains 99 parking spaces. Per a site
visit, there are approximately 33 available, marked pazking spaces in the back pazking lot, not
including 6 parking spaces that aze occupied by storage containers.
View looking west at the two storage containers along the westerly property line and volleyball
poles within the center playground/pazking field.
The lazge expanse of pavement in the center of the southerly pazking lot is used as a shared
playground/pazking azea and it is currently striped for basketball, volleyball, and four squaze,
which differs from the striping shown. on the site plan. There are volleyball poles and two
basketball backboazds installed in the pavement. When necessary, vehicles during the afternoon
pick-up are routed through the southerly pazking lot and out the easterly access. These
photographs depict the existing striping and playground equipment in the southerly pazking lot.
Acaciawood School Pazking Study 3 Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
View looking north from the southerly pazking lot ;at Buildings 3 (foreground) and 4
(background)
b. Proposed Site
No physical. changes aze proposed to the site. Operational .changes to accommodate an
increased enrollment include aone-way flow pick-up procedure in the afternoon, and whenever
necessary, through the back pazking lot.. The two lazge storage containers that occupy six
pazking spaces in the back pazking lot will be removed, as the church desires the use of those
pazking spaces on weekends.
c. Characteristics
There is another church on a parcel to the east of this site, that has an access onto this site's
easterly drive aisle via another gate. The two properties have an agreement that the school may
use the adjacent church's pazking lot when there aze lazge assemblies, however, based on a
conversation with the school's principal, the school has not had the need for any additional
Paz~g•
)v. Site Uses
The school is operated Monday through Friday. Classes begin at 8:10 AM and end at 3:10 PM,
with an eazlier dismissal on Fridays. For the purposes of this pazking study, the weekday school
and church uses will be evaluated,. and the pazking code for the use of all facilities concurrently
---will be provided.
Acaciawood School Parking. Study 4
Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
V. Parking Requirements
The parking requirements per Section 18.42 of the Municipal Code for Educational Institutions
and Religious Assemblies are provided in the table below.
Tabulation of Code-Required Parking for Educational Institutions and Community and
Religious Assembly
Land Use Quantity Parking Rate per Code-
Municipal Code Required
Parking
Element School 8 classrooms. ' 1/classroom 8
Elementary School 12 teachers 1/non-office 12
employee
School Office 645 SF
Church Office 350 SF 4/TSF 4
Total Office 945 SF or 0.945 TSF
High School 60 students 1/every 6 students 10
High School 12 teachers 1/non-office 12
employee
Bidg. S Assembly Hall 3,412 SF 99
Btdg. 1 Meeting Room 670 SF 29/TSF 19
Total Assembl Area 4,082 SF or 4.08 TSF 118
Bldg. 5 Assembly Hall 300 max. 6
Bldg. 1 Meeting Room 49 max. 0.02/max. occupancy 1
Total OCCU anc 349 max. occu anC when kimhen is provided) ,7
Storage Bldg.l 200
Storage Bldg. 2 100
Storage Bldg. 5
120 1.55/TSF 1
Total Stora a 420 SF or 0.42 TSF
Total parking spaces
re aired 172
As shown above, the school requires 1.72 pazking spaces based upon the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code, Section 18.42.040. The site, per the site plan, provides 126 pazking spaces,
when all the paved azeas aze used. The church and school do not operate concurrent activities, so
the table above would be the worst-case scenario. Scheduling of special events will be done to
avoid concunrent church services and school assemblies.
Acaciawood School Pazking Study 5 Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
Vd. Site Parking Counts
In order to assess the existing site's actual parking demand, Rafiq & Associates contracted with
Southland Car Counters to conduct parking counts every half hour during the morning and
afternoon on a typical weekday. Parking counts were taken on May 16, 2006. The summary of
the parking count is provided on page 6. The maximum number of vehicles counted was 27
vehicles at 3:00 PM. There were a total of 61 mazked pazking spaces available (not including the
center playground in the southerly pazking lot). This pazking count includes two church office
employees in the northerly pazking lot.
Parking Counts taken by Southland Car Counters
Tuesday
Acaciawood 5/16/06
School
'"~ `'~ . one T
~. ~ ~
~~ k z
goes ;~ s; ~~ '~I~,1~S~~'
~ p ~ ~
°
F -:
~
k~.4.
. ~ 5 1 : ~fi'..
6 1 7 ,~.
~
7 5 12
:~
~
14 12 ~26
.
14 12 ~ 26a-° ~'
.,. _
12 14 26 ~i
12 14 26`
12
„ 15 ~ "27°
7
8
. 12 ~ .,2Q
~
S 6 14 ~ - .
VII. Methodology of Study
Based upon the data above, the observed pazking demand for the current enrollment of 87
students is 27 vehicles. The build-out enrollment is anticipated to be 180 students. To forecast
the future pazking demand, we calculated a factor based upon the eventual enrollment of 180
future students divided by the current 87 students, or 2.07. Factoring up this actual observed
pazking demand of 27 by 2.07 results in a future pazking demand of 56 pazking spaces. This is
lower than the number of mazked, available, pazking spaces, (61), which aze currently onsite.
The site has sufficient pazking available onsite to accommodate the eventual build-out of the
school.
Acaciawood School Pazking Study 6 Itafiq & Associates, Inc.
VIII. Findings
The number of code-required pazking spaces is 172. The site plan shows that the site can
accommodate 126 pazking spaces. Based upon the municipal code parking requirements for
educational institutions and religious assemblies, the site is short by 46 spaces. However, due to
the restrictions placed on the students (only juniors and seniors are allowed to drive to school),
and carpooling that occurs, the actual pazking demand is much less. Also, the church does not
have concurrent services during the hours that the school is in session. The actual observed
pazking demand was 27. When factored up to account for an eventual increase in enrollment, the
forecasted pazking demand is 56. This forecasted pazking demand at build-out can easily be
accommodated within the 61 actual,. marked, and available pazking spaces.. The future pazking
needs: at the build-out of the school can be accommodated within the existing parking lots.
Finding Number .0101 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause
fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number- of such
spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and
reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use.
The Acaciawood School site provides adequate parking onsite for its daily school uses as
well as the uses for the church office in building 1, provided that there are no concurrent
church services and school assemblies.
Finding Number .0102 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate
vicinity of the proposed use.
The Acaciawood School provides adequate parking onsite to meet its observed parking.
demand. No offsite parking. along the public streets will be needed. When infrequent
special assemblies are scheduled, arrangements to secure additional parking, if necessary
will be made with the adjacent church. No on-street parking will be needed for the school
use.
Finding Number .0103 That the variance, under the conditions imposed,. if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for
such use under an agreement in compliance with subsection 18.42.050.030 (Non-Residential
Uses- Exception).
The Acaciawood School provides sufficient parking for it daily uses, and no overflow
parking will be occurring upon adjacent private property within the vicinity. For
infrequent school assemblies, the school will make arrangements with the adjacent church
to provide additional parking, if it is anticipated to be needed.
Finding Number .0104 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed
use.
Acaciawood School Pazking Study 7 12afiq & Associates, Inc.
The Acaciawood School provides sufficient parking. for its daily uses. Because the supply
of parking spaces is adequate for the anticipated parking demand, no congestion within the
parking lots is expected.. The school staff also monitors the drop-off and pick-up
procedure, such that the teachers are able to direct vehicles through the site to avoid any
queuing of vehicles onto La Palma Avenue.
Finding Number .0105 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
The Acaciawood School traffic will not block any adjacent driveways. School staff will
direct traffic to avoid any vehicles queuing onto La Palma Avenue in the vicinity of
adjacent driveways.
IX. Recommendations and Conclusions
The site will be able to accommodate the anticipated parking demand at the build-out of the
school, to 180 students, within the existing pazking azeas of the site, based on the current
observed pazking demand. The following three recommendations aze made:
a If vehicles should begin to queue onto La Palma Avenue during drop off or pick-up
periods, staff should be instructed to route the vehicles through the site and out. via the
easterly drive aisle.
® When there are lazge assemblies in which pazents are invited and all teachers aze present
on campus together, the principal. should make arrangements with the adjacent church for
overIlow pazking, if the need should arise.
® The school and church that shaze buildings at 2528 and 2530 W. La Palma Avenue
should coordinate any assemblies or services that are held during the week, such that they
aze not concurrent.
Acaciawood School Pazking Study 8 Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
Item No. 6
SP 94-, SP 94-, B
NORTHEAST RCL 89-90-48
INDUSTRIAL AREA RCL BB-69-59
RCL 09-90-08 RCL 84-85-04 ~
RCL 07-88-OB RCL 65-66-25
RCL 66-87.29 (Res Df Intent to ML) Q
RCL 65-66-25 (2) RCL 65-66-17 ~
CUP 2003-04699 °~
RCL 65-66-17 CUP 3881 E C-G
CUP 2005-05049 CUP 3253 p RCL 69-70-64
T-CUP 2004-04889 CUP 3514
CUP 2003-04822 ~ RCL 69-70-18
CUP 3881 VAR 4192 p>i CUP 2005-05029
CUP 3414 VAR 4156 ~ CUP 3822
CUP 3240 SHOPPING CNTR. N CUP 2077
CUP 2905 m CUP 1934
VAR 3892 D.A. 5 Q CUP 1766
(CUP 3314) CUP 1715
(CUP 1585) SP 9d-1 t° VAR 3977
CINEMA CITY RCL 656626 y. VAR 2733
(Res of Intent to ML) t
THEATRES Rcv7aszs (RCL 68-69-66)
D.A. S RCL 66x61] p c-D (CUP 1090)
VAR 4262 RCL 69-]41a VAR 4404 S
VAR 31d55 Z RCL6&7464 ( )
V-3145 S RCL 66661] (VAR 4307)
6ANK = CUP 3914 (VAR 2930)
~5 a Cvaeii° CANYON. VILLAGE
Q': RESTAURANT SHOPPING CENTER
° ~" ~ ~
7 167' y, ~1 P
SP 94-1 9P 84-1 T' .RCL6&7664-;_ q~M'q q VE
RCLfi66617 RCL 84-85-07 RCL6&70.18
T-CUP 2pp3-0491p RCL 65-66-25(1) ' ~RCL6666n rz V
CUP2p02-09699 CUP'3711 WP2pp605p55V
CUP 3985 PCN 96-04 ~ I CUP 2/48 QI
DA.S $,$JMINI MKT. ~" - sVAR 3854 >~
M-N-ouT g CAR WASH ~ VAR z3a7 '~,., .
REST. DA 5
® = C-G
C-G RCL 69-70-64
° (~ RCL fig-70-64 RCL 69-70-18 RCL 699-70-04
SP 841 ~ = RCL 69-70-18 CUP2365 RCL 69-70-18
RCL 7&77-16 RCL 65-fib-17 VAR 4145 T-CUP 2003-0476
RCL 65.66-25 CUP 3234 J CUP 2392 VAR 3426 S T-CUP 2002-0459
(Res pf Intent to ML) CUP 3233 Q CUP 1635 CUP 1420
T-CUP 2005-00873 CUP 1722 ~ ANAHEIM HILLS NURSERY
T-CUP 2003-04810 CUP 1721 TRAVELODGE
CUP 2002-04644 VAR 4267 t1J
T-CUP 2002-04809 VAR 4252 0_
CUP 2001-04465 VAR 3863 ~S
T-CUR 2000-04219
CUP 4115
ANAHEIM HILLS VILLAGE
SHOPPING CEMER
DA 5
® a
OP~SpACE RCL 6~-66-25 APIA RNER
(Re>~CLI65-66i7ML) SANTA '`t/'~
OPEN SPACE
p~p~
- IV
ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN 7HE SCENIC CORRIDOR (SC) OVERLAY ZONE.
- , s =~~ Subject Property
ConditionaL.Use Permit No. 2005-05055 Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: 1" = 200'
Requested By: ALBERT BAHU Q.S. No. 184
5700 East La Palma Avenue 10062
---- - _'-a_ _
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 6
6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion for Continuance)
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005-05055
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly-shaped 0.52-acre property is located at the southeast corner of La Palma
Avenue and Imperial Highway, having frontages of 140 feet on the east side of Imperial
:.Highway and 167 feet on the south side. of La Palma Avenue (5700 East La Palma Avenue).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of Code Section
No. 18.08.030.040.0402 (Commercial Retail Centers) to construct a three (3) unit
commercial retail center and Code Section No, 18.18.090.020.0207 to permit roof-mounted
equipment in the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone with waiver of the following:
(a)SECTION NO. 18.18.090.010.0102 .Minimum landscaped and structural
setback. 25 feet landscaped required; 9
feet-19.5 feet proposed;. structural
setback portion deleted)
BACKGROUND:
(3) The property is currently vacant and is zoned. C-G (SC) (General .Commercial, Scenic
Corridor Overlay). The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for General
Commercial land uses. Surrounding properties in all directions are also designated for
General Commercial land uses.
{4) The applicant has submitted the attached letter dated, June 29, 2006, requesting a
continuance to the July 24, 2006, Commission meeting since the property owner is unable to
attend the Planning Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
(5) .That the Commission, by motion, continue this item to the July 24, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
Srcu p2005-05055klwcont71006.do c
Page 1
C o
Attachment -Item No. 6
From:. Jim Whalley [mailto:jimw@gpaarchitects.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:16 PM
To: Kimberly Wong
Subject: RE: 5700 East La Palma
HELLO AGAIN KIMBERLY,
AS AN UPDATE, I AM ATTACHING OUR CURRENT SITE DESIGN PER THE OWNER'S
PREFERENCE FOR YOUR REPORT. WE JUST LEARNED THE THE OWNER WILL NOT BE
AVAILABLE FOR THE 7/10 MEETING DUE TO A PRIOR COMMITTMENT, AND ASK
CONTINUANCE UNTIL THE 7/24 MEETING. WE WILL STILL RESUBMITTOMORROW AS
INTENDED.
THANK YOU,
JIM WHALLEY
e - . _ _--
Item No. 7
g
kC x~y
°: ~'°
' o
i ow e~
iQ+w °~ ~~
6 w
a ~ .
a'~
:m w¢ '"O
O w
s
~m w
c' w' ~ ~oQ ~°° ~°O>°
g ~
2i ~~
Sz ~~i °
5°
i
tn 0
F
m w U
m x .
S
u
a
\~ /~/t~
'RF
AVENUE ORPE
!
'y :P /'
~'~Y
~ ey ~ ~, }
_ 4 `/ w`~Vi
UPALMA ~1 ~ r \
~
1 y,il~E gyRn •xr. ~. EMN~ ~ )))
i --
/ j~}
f _
AVENUE I 1 \ - ^
` r
\
LINCOLN ~
!M, ~
~
~ I
/
AVENUE ~
~
~
~r.~
I .. ~
Raa° ~
C
_ r
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~
6 ~
/
I 5` ~<
NAIELLA d
AVENNE , ~ 1
pUFA1AN
AVENUE ~
H
lv m~
Q
9~F ~y~y
~ 5y, ~y w
g
a ~
3
mn ~y ~$~
3
~
w
'tl
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 ._,~~~ Subject Properly
Specific Plan Amendment No. 2006-00035 Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Requested By: CITY OF ANAHEIM Q.S. No. n/a
Citywide ~oos~
~ - _ __ _ m
~~
L
~~ ~ may, `~~r(~/~
Date of Aerial Photo:
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431
Specific Plan Amendment No. 2006-00035
Requested By: CITY OF ANAHEIM
Subject Property
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. n/a
Citywide
foos~
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
7a. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0.330 (Motion)
(Previously Certified)
7b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0,2005-00431 - (Recommendation Resolution)
7c. AMENDMENT N0: 3 TO THE. NORTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC (Recommendation Resolution)
PLAN N0. 94-1 (TRACKING NO. SPN2006-000351
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION AND REQUEST:
(1) <General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431:
a. .LOCATION: Citywide and specific locations as follows (See Exhibit No. 2-A for vicinity map):
i. `Area 1: Four (4) properties situated on 5.49 acres located 670 feet east of the centerline
of Dale Avenue and. having frontages of 406 Peek oh the south side of Lincoln Avenue.
Property addresses include 2726, 2736 and 2748 West Lincoln Avenue (See Exhibit No.
2-6);
ii. Area 2: Two (2) properties situated on 1.38 acres located in the vicinity ofSroadway and
Manchester Avenue,. including a portion of railroad right-of-way approximately 897 feet
long, north-of Broadway and approximately 424 feet long, south of Broadway. There are
no addresses assigned to these properties (See Exhibit No. 2-C);
iii. Area 3: Four (4) properties situated on 2.94 acres located at the northwest corner of La
:Palma Avenue and. Harbor Boulevard, with frontages bf 504 feet on the north side of La
'Palma Avenue and 392 feet on the west side of Harbor Boulevard. Property addresses
'include 1001 and 1011 North: Harbor Boulevard and 515 and 525 West La Palma Avenue
{See Exhibit'No. 2-D);
iv, Area 4: One (1) property situated on 0.62. acre located approximately 80 feet north of the
r ntersection of Cottohwood Circle and Vermont Avenue, with a frontage of 331 feet on the
west side of Cottonwood CircielThe property address is 853 West Cottonwood Circle
(See Exhibit No. 2-E);
v, .Area 5: One (1) property situated on 0.62 acre located southwest of the intersection of
`'Santa Ana Streetand Olive Street, hcluding a portion of railroad. right-of-way
approximately 463 feet long and bounded by Santa Ana Street to the north and Oilve
Street to the east. There is no address assigned to this property (See ExhibitNo:2-F);
vi. 'Area 6: Four (4) properties situated on 7:1 acres located 359 feet northwest of the
centerline bf Claudina Way and having frontages of 974 feet on the hortheast side of
Anaheim Way. Property addresses include 1710 and 17308outh Anaheim Way (See
Exhibit No: 2-G);
vii. !Area 7: One (1) property situated on 0.44 acre located 1,000 feet east of the centerline of
East Street and having a frontage of 88 feet on the south side of Lincoln Avenue. The .
property address is 1280 East Lincoln Avenue (See Exhibit No. 2-H);
.viii. Area 8: `Nine {9) properties situated on 8.8 acres located at the northeast, southwest and
southeast corners of Miraloma Avenue ahd Red Gum Street. Propertyaddresses include
1260, 1310, 1320, 1330 and 1340 North Red Gum. Avenue and 2926, 2940, 2983 and
2985 East Miraloma Avenue (See Exhibit No. 2-I); and,
1
_ -_
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
ix. Area 9: One (1) property situated on 2.33 acres located at the. southwest corner of Monte
Vista Road and Bauer Road with frontages of 190 feet on the southwest side of Monte
Vista Road and 395 feet on the north side of Bauer Road. Property addresses include
S16D East Bauer Road and 8100 East Monte Vista Road (See Exhibit 2-J).
b. REQUEST: City-initiated (Planning Department) request to amend the Land Use, Circulation,.
Green and Growth Management Elements of the General Plan tb incorporate various extual
refinements and clarifications; o update various maps and tables resulting from General Plan
Amendments approved since the 2004 comprehensive update to the General Plan; to revise
the Corridor Residential land use designation description to allow for detached single-family
residential uses in donjunction with attached single-family residential uses and to remove
references to the minimum one-acre project size requirement; to amend the Green Element
<to include three additional parks and the expansion of an existing park facility; and, to
propose various amendments to;the Land Use Plan of the. Land Use Element, as shown. in
ExhibitNos. 2-A througfi 2-J.
(2) Amendment No. 3 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94.1 (Tracking No. SPN 2006-
00035):.
a. LOCATION: The Northeast Area Specific Plan consists of apprdximately 2,645 acres
generally located in the Santa Ana Canyom, bounded by the Citybf Placentia to the north, the
Orange. (SR-57) Freeway to the west, the Riverside. (SR-91) Freeway and Santa Ana River to
the south, and Imperial Highway to the east. The proposed amendment includes a cluster of
nine (9) properties situated on 8.8 acres with frontages on Miraloma Avenue and Red Gum
Street. Property addresses include 1260,1310, 1320, 11330 and!1340 North Red Gum
Avenue and 2926, 2940, 2983 and 2985 East Miraloma Avenue (See Exhibit No. 12).
b. REQUEST: City-initiated request to amend the Northeast Area Speck Plan (SP94-1) and
>its associated Development Area (DA)boundaries from DA 5 (Commercial Area) to DA 1
(IndustriaLArea) to be consistent with the revised General Plan land use designations
proposed as parfof General Plan Amendment No.'2005-00431.
BACKGROUND:
(3) In May 2004, a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan was approved by the City
Council following a recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission.: The updated
"General'Plan became effective on July B, 2004.:
The General Plan is a comprehensive planning document. that reflects the vision, goals and land
use=relatad pbllcies of the City. Periodic review and modification to the documenkis necessary in
order to ensure that its content is,up to date and is reflective of current City land usegoals and
policies. Planning Department staff recently requested that each City Department review various
sections of the General Plan in order to ensure that It is reflective of current goals and policies.
.Following this review,`various amendments were recommended by interdepartmental staff, as
described below:
a:` Planning staff recommends revising the Corridor Residential designation description as
described to paragraph no. 9 and updating various tables in the Land Use Element as
>;described in paragraphs nos. 7 and 10.
b. Public Works staff recommends incorporating various textual refinements throughout the
Circulation and Growth Management Elements.
2
-- _ _
r
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
c. Community Services staff recommends incorporating. three additional park facilities and the
expansion of one existing park facility into the Green Element. The revision of various maps,
ables and limited text included in the Green Element is also recommended.
(4) Since the adoptionbf the comprehensive update to the General Plan, a number of individual
amendments to the Land Use Pian df the Land Use Element have been approved. These
amendments necessitate the update of various tables, charts and text to ensure internal
consistency with the document. For this reason., various "clean up"items, subsequent to these
previously-approved actions, are being addressed as part of this amendment.
.DISCUSSION:
Land Use Element
The Land Use Element designates the distribution and genefatlocation of land uses, such as residential,
retail, industrial,'open space, recreation, and public uses. The land Use+Element also addresses the
permitketl density and intensity of the Variousland use designations as reflected in the Land Use Plan.
.:The proposed changes to the Land :Use Plan of the Land Use Element include a variety of textual and
map amendments: as described below:
(5) :Figure LU-1, Specific Plan Map. Amendment No. 1 to the Mountain Park Specific Plan (SP 90-1)
'was approved by the CityCouncil on August 23, 2005. As a follow up to this action, a modification
to the Specific Plan Map is proposed to depict theboundaries df the Mountain Park Speck Plan.
(6) Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan. Staff proposes to redesignate various properties throughout the City
as described below: c
a. Area 1: Staff proposes to redesignate these properties from the Low-Medium Density
Residehtial to the Medium bensity Residential land use designatiom(Exhibit No. 2-B). The
City's Redevelopment Agency recently purchased the Lincoln Inn motel, located at 2748
WesNLincoin Avenue. (identified as Parcel No. 1), with the intent of converting it into a
multiple-famlly residential project (Cherry Orchard). The current use of the property is a motel
and will continueto operate as such until the property and buildings can be rehabilitated.. The
proposed residential designation would be consistent with the Agency's plebs for the site.
The three parcels immediately to the east of the Lincoln fnn site are currently'developed with
multiple-famllyYesidential uses::Parcel No:2 on the same exhibit is currently developed with
a 42-unit apartment complex in the RM-4 zone; Parcel Nos. 3 and 4 are developed with a
plant nursery and multiple detached dwellings and are zoned Transition. The Housing
Elemeht identifies all four sites as Housing Opportunity Sites. Staff recommends that Area 1
be designated as Medium DensityResidential in the Land Use Plan as such a designation
would be consistent with. the existing and anticipated use of the area
b. Area 2: Staff proposes to redesignate these sites from the GeneraLCommercial and Park to
the Railroad and use designation (Exhibit No: 2-C). The Land Use Plan includes a distinct
Railroad"designation: for railroad rights-of-way that traverse the City. Staffsecommends
that, =because these two parcels are used exclusively for pail activity, Area 2 be designated as
Railroad in the Land Use Plan.
a. Area 3:Staff proposes to redesignate these sites from he Institutional to the General
Commercial landuse designation (Exhibit No.2-D). The four parcels at the northwest comer
of Harbor Boulevard and La Palma. Avenue were inadvertently designated for Institutional
3
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
Uses as part of the 2004 comprehensive update to the General Plan. The adjacent property
to the west is occupied by a City of Fullerton water pumping facility and the subjectproperties
mistakenly carried the same institutional designation. The current zoning of these parcels are
General Commercial. and existing uses include an assisted living facility (Anaheim Gardens
Retirement Care Center), church, canvash and conveniencestore. Staff requests that Area 3
be designated as General Commercial in the Land Use Planto be consistent with the area's
underlying uses end zoning.
d. Area 4: Staff proposes to redesignate this site from. the Open Space to the Parks land use
designation (Exhibit No. 2-E). The property is currently developed as Cottonwood Park, a
mini park located at Cottonwood. Circle and Vermont Avenue. The Open Space designation
is typically reserved for passive open space areas, rather than active park facilities. Staff
recommends that this parcel be redesignated as Parks in the Land Use Plan.
e. -Area 5: Staff proposes o redesignate this site from he Low-Medium Density Residential to
'the Railroad land use designation (Exhibit No. 2-F). This parcel is,currently used exclusively
for rail activity. Staff recommends Ghat this,parcel be designated as Railroad in the Land Use
=Plan.
f. Area 6: Staff proposes to redesignate these sites from the General Commercial to the Parks
land use designation,{Exhibit No:>2-G) The Clty has recently acquired four unimproved
parcels near.the Intersection of Claudina Way and Anaheim Way, just outside of the Platinum.
Triangle boundaries. A Request for Proposals (RFP) process has been initiated for the
design of a 7.1 acre park (Platinum Triangle Park) with sports fields, parking, small picnic
`areas and restrooms,proposed for he site. A design consultant will be selected py,the end of
August 2006 with a Master Plan and Construction Documents to be completed byspring
2007. Construction is anticipated to begin during summer 2007 with .project completion
expected by spring;2008. Staff recommends that Area 6 be redesignated as Parks in the
Land Use'Plan in light of hese future plans.
g. Area 7: Staff proposes to redesignate this site from Schools to the Medium: Density
Residential land use designation (Exhibit No: 2-H). The property is cumently improved with
office and retail uses, but was inadvertently designated. as Schools because the site is
.:bounded on the eastand south by Lincoln Elementary School. The Medium Density
Residential designation for this site would. be consistent with the land use designations of the
properties ocated immediately west of the subject property: Staff recommends that this
...parcel be redesignated as Medium Density Residential in the Land Use Pian because of
hese:reasons.
h. Area 8: Staff proposes to redesignate these sites from GeneraLCommercial to the General
:Industrial land use designation (Exhibit No.i2-I). The nine (9) properties encompassing the
northeast, southeast and southwest comers of Miraloma Avenue and Red Gum Street are
located within the boundaries of the Northeast Area Specific Plan. As part of the
comprehensive update to the General Plan, the Planning and Community Development
Departments made various refinements to,the Development Area boundaries within this
SpecifiaPlan. Likewise, tall believes these nine parcels would be more; appropriately
designated forGeneral Industrial and uses. These sites are currently developed with
concrete tilt-up buildings, housing a variety of general industrial uses..: Community
Development Department staff believes that current industrial uses are appropriate for this
ocation and, further, do notanticipate future commercial development at this location.
Amendment No: 3 to the Northeast Area Specific Pian would serve to amend the
4
Staff Report to the
..Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
.Item No. 7
Development Area boundaries to include these sites in Development Area 1 (Industrial Area),
es described in,paragraph nos. 21 through 25 of this report.
i. Area 9: Staff proposes to redesignate this site from the Public-Institutional to the Parks land
use designation (See Exhibit No. 2-J). The Anaheim Public Utilities .Department is working
with the Community Services Department on the construction of an electrical substation and
passive park on this site. The substation is being constructed below grade within an
underground vault and a terraced lawn surface above will serve as a public park. Further
information regarding the status of the project is included in paragraph no. 1li(d). Staff
requests that this parcel be redesignated as Parks in the Land Use Plan to represent the
future public use bf the site.
(7) Table LU-2, Residential Land Use Designations (Exhibit No. 3). Staff proposes to modify a note.
on this table to clarify that other zones may be substituted for the typical implementation zones,
provided that the overall density rages established by the Geheral Plan' are not exceeded. This
information was inadvertentlypmitted when the comprehensive update to the General Plan was
prepared: Clarifying language pertaining to Specific'Plans and Overlay Zones is also included.
(6} ''Figure LU-5, Arnas of fhe City with Special Density limitations (Exhibit No. 4-B). This map would
``be modified to reflect the boundaries of the Stonegate area, which has a density limitation of 35
dwelling units for the'32-acre site. General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00416 was;approved in
`conjunction with this project, however, this particular map was not amended to reflect the
approved'oensityiimitation for the site.
(g) Corridor Residential land use designation description. The Comdor Residential land use
'designation is one of the new land use categories created as part of the comprehensive update to
'the General Pian. The intent of this designation is to facilitate the conversion of shallow strip
'commercial sites into quality residential projects. The maximum allowable density of this land use
'.designation is 13 dwelling units per acre. iJ In response to recent developer interest,'staff proposes.
various modifications to this land use designation. The first modification relates to'the
recommended deletion of the minimum one acre project size'raquiremant. Staff has reviewed all
Corridor-designated: parcels less than an acre in size and found that many of them have the
'potential td be developed witha qualityYesidential project based on theirlot depth end street/alley
access. `The one acre project size requremenf'could preclude the future development of these
sites. A code amendment {Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046) is currentlyin process
and will also change the Zoning Code in this regard. As a part of said code amendment, staff will
be recommending that Corridor projects maintain a`minimum`10-unit size in order to ensure their
`quality and on-going'effective'management and maintenance.
The second mod cation would serve to allow single-family detached housing when provided in
`conjunction with a single-family attachedproduct.!Since the comprehensive update to the
'General Pian, staff has been approached by developers interested in developing combination
attached and detached housing projecte on some bf the IargeCCorridorResidential sites. Staff
has reviewed this issue and has determined that it is appropriate to allow such a mix of unit types.
'in order to maintain consistency with the goals and. policies of the Community Design Element as
it pertains to Mid-Block Corridor Residential'Development, detached units would only be
permitted when located behind street-fronting attached townhomes. Staff does not propose a
change in .the maximum allowable density. The Zoning Code currently prohibits any detached
single-family residences in the`RM-1 Zone (the implementation zone fior the Corridor Residential
` designation). An amendment to the Zoning Code allowing detached single-family: dwellings in
`conjunction with attached townhomes is also being proposed as part of Zoning Code Amendment
No. 2006-00046.
5
- . _
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
Following is the proposed change to the description of the CorrdocResidential land use
designation:
.The Corridor Residential designation is intended to provide for quallEy
single-
familyattached tewflheuse-style housing Eypisalyr fronting on arterial.
highways'and incorporating a rear access drive or service alley. For projects
with sufficient debth. this designation may also incoraorate single-
family detached housing located behind the attached aroduct. This
designation is intended to provide for housing opportunities along the City's
arterial corridors: This category is implemented by he RM-1 zone. The
permittetl density range for Corridor Residential is from zero up to 13.0
dweiling'units per gross acre:
(10) TableslU-5, Residential8uildouf Estimates (Exhibit No. 5) and Table LU-6, Non-Residential
Buildout Estimates (Exhibit No. 6): Staff proposes to update both tables with updated land uee
acreage and projected residential and non-residential estimates, respectively, These changes
are necessary as a result of updated.Geographic Information System,(GIS) mapping processes
which result in more accurate and refined land use acreage calculations. Additionally, the
basis. City staff uses this information to update the parcel lines and then adjusts land use
designations (acreages) accordingly. These annual updates and corrections result in slight shifts
in parcel boundaries and parcel acreages.
Finally, changes to the tables reflect previously-approved General Plan Amendments that were
processed after the comprehensive,update to the General: Plan as well as the land use changes
being proposed as part of this General Pian Amendment. These Amendments. represent the most
significant land use acreage changes. for Tables LU-5 and LU-6. Since the General Plan was
adopted in 2004, thirteen General Pian Amendments havebeen approved that changetl tfte land
use designations on 104.fi acres of land. Some amendments havebeen minor and use
designation changes of less than one acre. Others have been more significant, covering. over 30
acres of land. These thirteen amendments are now accurately reflected in these tables.
Circulation Element
The Circulation Element addresses the identification, location and extent of existing and proposed major
thoroughfares, transportation facilities and bicycle/pedestrian routes. It serves as an infrastructure plan
and is closely related to the Land Use Element.
(11) The Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division staff intends to incorporate various
textualrefinementsthvoughout the Circulation Element. Exhibit No. 7-A shows the proposed
changes, with tleletions identified with text stfiketlareughs and additions shown n underlined text.
The majority of the text changes are a result ofproviding additional clarificatiodorensuving
consistency with the objectives and policies of he Orange County Transportation Authority and/or
Caltrans.
(12) Reference to the. Right-of--way Exceptions Map.. Staff has Included a reference to the Right-of-way
Exceptions Map on Page C-5 of the Circulation Element, :which identifies specific street segments
° that for various reasons do not conform to the City standard details for various arterial highway
classifications. The'list and map are maintained. by the Public Works Department and could be
modified on an as-needed basis. This map has historically been incorporated into the Circulation
6
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006.
Item No. 7
Element as a companion to the Planned Roadways Network Map (previously knownas the
Circulation Map), but was inadvertently omitted from the Comprehensive General Plan Update.
.Staff recommends that the following related language be added to Page C-5 of the Circulation
Element:
it is important to note. that there are some exceptions o each classification
and.that individual streets may have modified standards; as identified in the
Right-of-Way Exceptions Map maintained by the Public Works
Department. Development Services Division.
(13) Santa Ana Canyon Road Access Points Map. In order to minimize vehicular conflict points on
Santa Ana Canyon Road and facilitate the orderly development of he area, the Santa Ana
Canyon Road Access Points Map was adoptedby the Ctty Council on January 11, 1966. Prior
versions of the General Plan included reference to said map. Staff recommends incorporating the
Santa Ana Canyon Access Points Map as one of thepigures of the Circulation Element. No
changes to the designated access points are proposed by his General Plan Amendment.
(14) Figure C-4, Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities: While the primary purpose of this map is to
identify existing and futurebicycie routesand trails, other pertinent information including the
locations of parks and open space are also depicted. This map would be modified to reflect the
additionel`proposed,park sites described in paragraph no. 16 of this report.
:The Hidden Canyon Regional Trail would be modified to reflect the actions related to the
Stonegate residential project.Stonegate included;approval of GPA2004-00416, which amended
he GreemPlan to realign the Hidden Canyon Regional Trail,fiowever, the F~cisting antl Proposed
"Bicycle Facilities map was hoEamended et that time. The proposed map addresses this
discrepancy.
The final recommended change to this map relates to the removal of the bicycle parking symbols.
'Typicalaocations for bicycle,parking'irtclude public;parks, transit facilities and major.:employment
centers. There arenumerousiother locations throughout the,City where bicycle perking exists,
however, they are not monitored or enforced by the City. Far this reason, providing this :depiction
on themep maybe misleading and, more importantly, the information may be inaccurate.
Green Element
Green Element. The Community Services Department continually strives to identify additional park and
recreation facilities to meet the needs of the City's expanding population. As a result of their efforts over
the past two years, three additional park sites have been. identified and acquired and one existing park
facility,(Maxweli Park) is planned foeexpansion:,The following are recommended amendments to the
Green Element:
(15) :Figure G-i, Green Plan (Exhibit No. 8-B); The purpose of the Green Plan is to make spatial
':connections throughout the City through: parks, trails, open: space and,fandscaping. This map
features Park Deficiency Areas which reflect those areas that,,due to population figures, and
+limited park opportunities, are underserved by recreational facilities. These deficiency areas
inGude residential areas that are located outside pf aone-half mile radius of Community and
Neighborhood Parks orone-quarter mile radius of a Mini Park.
This revised Green Plan has been amended to reflect the locations of new park facilities. The
Park Deficiency Areas have been modified accordingly and:have resulted in an overall decrease
7
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
in "deficient' areas. Other changes to the Park Deficiency Areas have resulted from three
:discrepancies on the original map as described below. (See Exhibit 8-A.)
a. First, buffers were inadvertently created around two parks. located outside of the City
boundaries, however, it has been the City's policy to ensure that park needs are being met by
:parks provided. in our own city. For his reason, additional deficiency areas are shown on the
west end ofthe City in the approximate area of Knott Avenue and Western Avenue, near
..Lincoln Avenue, and a smaller area at thenorthwest City boundary.
b. The second change is less obvious and is a result of using a different method to create the
deficiency area buffer. The original. buffers were created by plotting points in the approximate
centersbf each park site. The revised buffers were created based on perimeter parcel lines
ahd have resulted in better accuracy and consistency because of the irregular shapes and ,
configurations of manyof the park sites.
c. Staff proposes to modify the legend and note on Figure G-1 in order to show that the Park
Deficiency Areas pertain to Neighborhood deficiencies, since Community parks have a
senrlce radius bf two miles for Community park functions. Community parks serve
Neighborhood park functions within a ohe-half mile radius.
(16) Figure G-4, Existing Park Facilities (Exhibit No. 9-8) and Table G-7, Existing Park Facilities
(Exhibit'No. 10-6). For planning purposes, the City has aditionally been divided into three Park,
Recreation and Commuhlty8ervice Areas (PRCS): West Anaheim orated west of Euclid Street;
CentratAnaheim'sltuated easYof Euclid Street and west of the Santa Ana River; antl East
Anaheim, located east of the Santa Aha River. Figure G-4`depicts the park and other recreational
facilities owned and operated bythe City. Table'G-1 is a companion to the map and lists the
various sports antl recreational facilities provided at each park in a table format. The#ollowing
park programs have resulted in changes to the map and table:
a. Expansion of Maxwell Park. Through a cooperative lease agreement with Southern California
Edison, the City will be expantling the existing 16.2-acre Maxwell Park into`ah' Edison right-of-
wayto the west that was. previously a nursery. As part of the 7-acre expansion, there will be a
new day-use T-ball sports field with back stop and seating areas; two landscaped turfareas;
two parking lots with a total of 128 parkfig spaces; concrete walkways with security fighting;
and open passive turf areas. The park is in the plan check phase with. the bidding process
expected to take place in September 2006 and construction. expected to begin in late Fall
2006.
b. Proposed Energy Field Park. Energy Field Park will be a 3-acre park located on South Ninth
Street, between Kateila Avenue and Cerritos Avenue. -The park's playtield will be equipped
with photovoltaic (PV) components and wiilbe constructed underSouthem California Edison
transmission Ilnes. Amenities will include a turf playtield, interpretive signage, one public
restroom and two picnic structures. An eight foot high decorative block wall will separate the
:park path from the adjacent residences.'Walkways, security lighting, playequlpment and
landscaping`are also proposed elements for thispark.?he park development project has
bompletedthe desighphase ahd is currentlyin plan check.<The bidding process is expected
to take place in September`2006 with the start of construction expected to begin In late FaIF
2006.
...,.
c. Platinum Triangle Park. The City has recently acquired four unimproved parcels near the
intersection of Claudtna Way and Anaheim Way,'just outside of the Platinum Triangle
'bouhdaries.The Request for Proposals (RFP} process has been initiated for the design of the
8
f
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 1D, 2006
Item No. 7
7.1 acre park with sports fields, parking, small picnic areas and restrooms. A design
consultant will be selected by the end of August 2006 with a master plan. and. construction
documents to be completed by spring 2007. Construction is anticipated to begin during. :
summer 2007. with project completion expected by spring 2008.
d. Roosevelt Park and Park Electrical Substation. The Anaheim Utilities Department is working
with the Community Services Department on,the construction of an electrical substation on
this site. The substation will be located in an underground vault and will serve the growing
need for energy in East Anaheim. Terracing has been completed;on top,of the substation to
create a small passive. park for thelocai community at,the same. grade as She adjacent
residences.;Nosports or other recreationatfeatures are proposed. at this park. The substation
and park's construction is in its final stages with project completion expected in Tate August
2006.
(17) Anaheim's Existing Facilities. The following text would be modified to accurately reflect the
number and types,of parks identified in Figure G-4 and Table G-1, as follows:
As shown in Figure G-4, Anaheim currently owns or operates a wide variety
of parks and recreation facilities, totaling ~ aparoximately 700 acres.
These include:
® 24 neighborhood parks
® 11 community parks
® ~ 8 mini-parks
• 5 nature centers
® 3 specialized recreation centers
These parks feature passive uses such as picnic tables, barbecue facilities,
.and tot lots as well as activeuses such as ball fields and tennis courts. +
(18) The Green Plan: Park DefrciehcyAreas. As described in paragraph no.' 15, deficiency areas
include'residential areas that are located outside of a one-half mile radius of Neighborhood Parks
orone-quarter mile radius bf Mini Parks.`'Community Parks have a service radius of two miles
and also serve Neighbofidod Park functions within. a dne-half mile'radius: The text of the Green
Element ihcorractly states that residential areas Ideated outside of a two-mile radius of
'-Community Parks are considered deficiency areas:?Thefoliowing text would bemodified:
The Green Pian: Park Defciency Areas
'One of the key features of the Green Plan (Figure G-1) is the itlentification of
`Park Deficiency Areas. Park Deficiency Areas reflect those areas that, due
o population pressures and limited park opportunities; are underserved'by
xacreationai facilities"and includes residential areas that are located outside
of a one-half mile radius of Neighborhood and ' '
of Community Parks or one-quarter mile radius of a Mint Park. Community
Parks have a service radius'of two miles and also'serva Neighborhood
Park functions withlh gone-half mile radius. These areas are based on
'needs established in the last update of the'Parks and Recreation Element,
demographic changes since the last update, and future land use and
employment trends described in the tend Use Element.
9
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
Growth Management Element
Growth Management Element. The Growth Management Element is required if the City is to receive
funds fortransportation :improvements Uhder Measure M. Tne Element also implements applicable goals
of the Orange County Congestion Management Plan.
(19) The Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division recommends incorporating minor
textual refinements and clarifications throughout the Growth Management Element. Exhibit No.
11-A shows the proposed changes; with deletions identified with text str+ket#rrsughs and additions
shown in underlined text.
(20) .Figure GM-1, County of Orange Growth Management Areas Encompassing Anaheim. Anaheim
encompasses portions of foU~ of the 11' CountyGrowth Managemenfgreas.' ExhibitNo 11-C
hows the proposed map. No substantive changes are requested; the modification recommended
by staff extends the areas shown on the current map (Exhibit No. 11-B) and expands the
depiction of the Growth Management Areas to indlude portions of other adjacentjurisdictions.
Since the purpose of the Growth Management Element is to ensure that theplahning and
management of transportation and public facilities meet County-wide needs, it!is important to
showthe relationship of the Citys transportation network with adjacent jurisdictions.
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE NORTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN No. 94-1 tSPN2006-000351:
{21) Amendment No. 3 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan. The City Council adopted the Northeast
Area Specific Plan on August 22, 4.995 to provide for the orderly development of the 2,645-acre
Northeast Industrial Area. (since re-named The .Canyon) to foster the development of a well-
designed, high-quality business and employment center.
(22) As part of the comprehensive update to the General Plan, Planning and Community Development
Department staffs reviewed the Development Area boundaries and. associated zoning provisions
of the Specific Plan area and recommended a number of refinements to the existing Development
Area boundaries. Since the update, tall has identified one additional area, as shown in Exhibit
No. 12, that would be more appropriate in an aitemate Development Area. The northeast,
southeast and southwest corners of Mlraloma Avenue and Red Gum,Street are currently located
in Development Area 5 (Commercial). Staff recommends that this area be included as part of
Development Area 1 (Industrial Area).
(23) As part. of the General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431, he General Pian.land use designation
for the area Is proposed to change from General Commercial to General Industrial,sas described
in paragraph nd.,6(h) of this report. The recommended amendment o the Northeast Area.
Specific Pian would serve to amend the development area boundaries to reflect the revised
General Pfan land use designation.
(24)Development Area 1 is intended to provide for increased opportunities for a mix of light industrial,
corporate headquarters, and research and development uses with essential support services at
strategic locations. The current underlying base zone used for land uses and development
standards is "I" (Industrial).
10
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 7
(25) Development Area 5 is intended to provide for and encourage the orderly development of
.commercial retail areas throughout the Specific Plan Area, which serve the demand for a wide
variety of goods end services. The current underlying base zone used for land uses and
development standards and is "CG" (General Commercial}.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(26) On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330
("FEIR No. 330") under Resolution No. 2004-94, and determined that said Final Environmental
Impact Report fully complies with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and is
adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for General Plan Amehdment No. 2005-
A0431 and for future discretionary actions described in Environmental Impact Report No. 330,
including follow-up actions to correct errors and omissions in the new General Plan where
:necessary.
(27) Initial Studies have. been prepared by Community Services Department staff for the expansion of
MaxweiLPark and the adtlitions of Energy Field and Rooseveltparks. No additional
environmental documentation is required for theproposed amendments to the Green Plan as any
potential environmental issues have been enelyzed and addressed by each project's respective
environmental impact analysis. Since a master. plan has not yet. been established for the Platinum
.Triangle: Park, no environmental documentation has been prepared. An Initial Study will be
prepared. for the Platinum Triengle Park once the park is designed and prior to implementation of
the project.
(28) 'The portions of this General Plan Amendment which are being recommended as a follow up to
previously-approved projects do not require additional environmental analysis above and beyond
that which was prepared as part of their respective discretionary approvals.
j29) Staffhas prepared an Initial Study for the proposed amendments listed in Paragraph Nos. 1 and
2 of this staff report and has determined that FEIR No. 330, previously certified by the City
'Council for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and related projects, is adequate to serve
as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Action and satisfies all the
requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for
the Proposed Action.
RECOMMENDATION:
(30) Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the public
hearing, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the evidence
presented in this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the public hearing, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached draft resolution,. recommending that the City Council
adopt General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 based on the findings contained in the attached
draft resolution.
(31) Staff recommends unless additional or contrary information is received during the public hearing
and, based upon the evidence submitted, including the evidence presented in this staff report,
and•oral and written evidence presented at the public hearing the Planning Commission adopt the
attached draft resolution, recommending that the City Council adopt Amendment No. 3 to the
Northeast Area Specific Plan (SPN2006-00035) to amend the Development Area boundaries
within the Northeast Area: Specific Pian as described in paragraph No. 22, based upon the
findings contained in the attached draft resolution.
11
~ _ _ _ _
[®6~F'fj
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006-""'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2005-00431 PERTAINING TO THE LAND USE, CIRCULATION,
GREEN. AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Council did adopt the Anaheim General Plan by Resolution
No. 69R-644, showing the general description and extent of possible future development within the City;
and
.WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 2004-95, adopted a
comprehensive update'to the General Plan for the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, staff anticipated that periodic review and modification to the document would
occur; and
WHEREAS, Planning Department staff recently requested that each City Department
review various sections of the General Plaq in order to ensure that it is reflective pf current goals and
policies,. and
WHEREAS, following this review, various amendments were recommended by
interdepartmental staff, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.68 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, provisions of the
General Plan may be amended whenever the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare
require such amendment when adopted by a resolution. of the City Council in the manner prescribed bylaw;
and
.WHEREAS, on July 10, 2006, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing to consider a General Pian Amendment, designated as General Plan Amendment No.2005-00431,
notice of said hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said General Plan Amendment and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment proposes to amend the Land Use, Circulation,
Green and Growth Management Elements of the General Pian, as follows:
Land Use Element
(a) .Amend "Figure LU-1, Specific Plan Map" to include a depiction of the Mountain Park
:Specific Plan (SP 90-4) boundaries, as shown on Exhibit No. 1-B, on file with the
Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full
(b) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Pian" to re-designate four (4) properties situated
on 5.49 acres located 670 feet east of the centerline of Dale Avenue and having
frontages of 406 feet on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, as shown on attached
Exhibit No. 2-B and which is on file with the Planning Department, from Low-
Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential.
(c} Amend' "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate two (2) properties situated
on 1.38 acres located in the vicinity of Broadway and Manchester Avenue,
including a portion of railroad right-of-way approximately 897 feet long north of
Broadway and approximately 424 feet long south of Broadway, as shown on
attached Exhibit No. 2-C and which is on file with the Planning Department, from
General Commercial and Open Space to Railroad.
(d) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate four (4) properties situated
on 2.94 acres located at the northwest corner of Harbor Boulevard' and La Palma
Avenue, with frontages of 392 feet on the west side of Harbor Boulevard and 504
feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue, as shown on attached Exhibit No. 2-D
and which is on file with the Planning Department, from Public Institutional to
General Commercial
(e) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate one (1) property situated on
0.62 acre located approximately 80 feet north of the intersection of Cottonwood
Circle and Vermont Avenue, with a frontage of 331 feet on the west side of
Cottonwood Circle, as shown on attached Exhibit No. 2-E and which is on file with
the Planning Department, from Open. Space to Parks.
(f) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate one (1) property situated on
0.62 acre located southwest of the intersection of Santa Ana Street and Olive
Street, including a portion of railroad right-of-way approximately 463 feet long and
bounded by Santa Ana Street to the north and Olive Street to the east, as shown
on attached Exhibit No. 2-F and which is on file with the Planning Department,
from Low-Medium Density Residential to Railroad.
(g) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate four (4) properties situated
on 7.1 acres located 359 feet northwest of the centerline of Claudina Way and
having frontages of 974 feet on the northeast side of Anaheim Way, as shown on
attached Exhibit No. 2-G and which is on file with the Planning Department, from
General Commercial to Parks.
(h) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate one (1) property situated on
0.44 acre located 1,000 feet east of the centerline of East Street and having a
frontage of 88 feet on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, as shown on attached
Exhibit No. 2-H and which is on file with the Planning Department, from Schools
to Medium Density Residential
(i) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate nine (9) properties situated
on 8.8 acres at the northeast, southwest and southeast comers of Miraloma
Avenue and Red Gum Street, as shown on attached Exhibit No. 2-I and which is
on file with the Planning Department, from Generaf Commercial to Industrial.
(j) Amend "Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan" to re-designate one (1) property situated on
2.53 acres located. at the southwest comer of the intersection of Monte Vista
Road and Bauer Road with frontages of 190 feet on the southwest side of Monte
Vista Road and 395 feet on the north side of Bauer Road, as shown on attached
Exhibit No. 2-J and which is on file with the Planning Department, from Public-
Institutional to Parks.
(k) Amend "Table LU-2, Residential Land Use Designations" and 'Table LU-3, Non-
Residential Land Use Designations" to clarify that other zones may be substituted for
the typical implementation zones, provided that the overall density ranges
- established by the General Plan are not exceeded, as shown on Exhibit No. 3, on file
with the Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if
set forth in full.
(I) Amend "Figure LU-5, Areas. of the City with Special Density Limitations" to include
a depiction of the boundaries of the Stonegate area which has a density limitation
of 35 dwelling units for the 32-acre site, as shown on Exhibit. No. 4-B, on file with
the Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if
set forth in full
(m) Modify the description of the Corridor Residential designation:
The Corridor Residential designation is intended to provide
for
prejest-sites-fersingle-family attached tewaheuse~tyte
housing typisaity fronting on arterial highways and
incorporating a rear access drive or service alley. For
projects with sufficient depth, this designation mayalso
incorporate single-family detached housing located
behind the attached product. This designation is intended
to provide for housing opportunities along the City's arterial
corridors. This category is implemented by the RM-1 zone.
The permitted density range for Corridor Residential is from
zero up to 13.0 dwelling units per gross acre.
(n) Amend "Table LU-5, Residential Buildout Estimates" and "Table LU-6, Non-
Residentiai Buildout Estimates" with updated land use acreage and projected
residential and non-residential estimates, as shown on Exhibit No. 5 and Exhibit
No. 6, respectively, on file with the Planning Department and which are
incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
2. Circulation Element
(a) Amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to incorporate various textual
refinements and clarifications, as shown on Exhibit No. 7-A, on file with the Planning
Department and which is incorporated. herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
(b) Incorporate "Figure C-2, Santa Ana Canyon Access Points Map," adopted by the City
Council on January 11, 1966, as a figure in the Circulation Element and which is
shown on Exhibit No. 7-C, on file with the Planning Department and which is
incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
(c) Amend "Figure C-5, Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities" (previously Figure C-4)
to reFlect the addition of three proposed park sites, depict the realignment of the
Hidden Canyon Regional Trail, and remove the bicycle parking symbols from the
map, as shown on Exhibit No.7-E, on file with the Planning Department and which is
incorporated herein py this reference as if set forth in full.
3
3. Green Element
(a) Amend "Figure G-1, Green Plan" to reflect changes to the Park Deficiency Areas, as
shown on Exhibit No. 8-B, on file with the Planning Department and which is
incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
(b) Amend "Figure G-4, Existing Park Facilities" to include three proposed park sites and
the expansion of an existing park as shown on Exhibit No. 9-B, on file with the
Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full.
(c) Amend "Table G-1, Existing Park Facilities" to include three proposed park sites and
the expansion of an existing. park as shown on Exhibit. No. 10-B, on file with the
Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full
(d) Modify the text. pertaining to Anaheim's Existing Facilities:
Anaheim's Existing Facilities. The following text would be
modified to accurately reflect the number and types of parks
identified in Figure G-4 and Table G-1, as follows:
As shown in Figure G-4, Anaheim currently owns or operates a
wide variety of parks and recreation facilities, totaling ~
aaaroximately 700 acres. These include:
e 24 neighborhood parks
m 11 community parks
q ~ 8 mini-parks
5 nature centers
3 specialized recreation centers
These parks feature passive uses such as picnic tables,
barbecue facilities, and tot lots as well as active uses such. as
ball fields and tennis courts.
(e) Modify the text pertaining to The Green Plan: Park Deficiency Areas:
The Green Plan: Park Deficiency Areas
One of the key features of the Green Plan (Figure G-1) is the
identification of Park Deficiency Areas. Park Deficiency Areas
reflect those areas that, due to population pressures and limited
park opportunities, are underserved by recreational facilities and
includes residential areas that are located outside of a one-half mile
radius of Neighborhood and
Community Parks or one-quarter mile radius of a Mini Park.
Community Parks have a service radius of two miles and also
radius. These areas are based on needs established to the last
update of the Parks and Recreation Element, demographic
changes since the last update, and future land use and employment
" "` trends described in the Land Use Element.
4
4. Growth Management Element
(a) Amend the Growth Management Element of the General Plan to incorporate various
textual refinements and clarifications, as shown on Exhibit No. 10-A, on file with the
Planning Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full
(b) Amend "Figure GM-1, County of Orange Growth Management Areas Encompassing
Anaheim" to expand the depicted Growth Management Areas to include portions of
other adjacentjurisdictions, as shown on Exhibit No. 11-C, on file with the Planning
Department and which is incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Anaheim City Planning Commission. did adopt its
Resolution No. PC2006--"' containing a report of its findings, a summary of the evidence presented at said
hearing, and recommending that General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 be adopted by the City Council;
and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to amend the
Land Use, Circulation, Green and Growth Management Elements of the General Plan;: and did recommend, by
motion, that the City Council, based on its independent review of the Initial Study prepared in connection with.
the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 and unless additional or contrary information is
received during the public meeting, find and determine, based upon said Initial Study and any evidence
received at the public meeting, that no additional significant effect will result from the proposed modifications,.
no new mitigation measures or alternatives will be required, and that the proposed General Plan Amendment
No. 2004-00431 is within the scope of the Final Environmental. Impact Report No. 330, and that the
previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 for General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419, which was a
comprehensive update to Anaheim General Plan, is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and is adequate to serve as the required
environmental documentation for the proposed Amendment and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA~ and
that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the proposed General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the
Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim
approve and adopt a resolution to amend the Land Use, Circulation, Green and Growth Management
Elements of the General Plan.
July 10,.2006.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting. of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on July 10, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS:
IN W ITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY,. ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
6
[® Fl'j
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006--***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO THE NORTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 94-1, INCLUDING
RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM DEVELOPMENT
AREA 5 "COMMERCIAL AREA" TO DEVELOPMENT AREA 1 "INDUSTRIAL
AREA,.
WHEREAS, on August 22, 1995 the City Council of the City of Anaheim approved Resolution
No. 95R-155 to approve Specific Plan No. 94-1, the Northeast Area Specific Plan, for the 2,645-acre area
generally bounded by the Riverside (SR-91) Freeway on the south, the Orange (SR-57) Freeway on the west,
Orangethorpe Avenue on the north and Imperial Highway on the east; and that on September 12, 1995 the
City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 5517 and 5518 to add Chapter 18.110 "Specific Plan No. 94-1(SP 94-1)
-Northeast Area" to the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to zoning and development standards for the
Northeast Area Specific Plan, and to amend the Zoning Map by incorporating said 2,645-acre area into the SP
94-1 zone
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1996 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5563 amending Ordinance
No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to permit service stations and automotive vehicle repair as conditional uses in
Development Area 4 'Transit Core" of the Northeast Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 1"); and
WHEREAS, on June 4, 1996 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5564 amending Ordinance
No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to permit service stations and automotive vehicle repair as conditional uses in
Development Area 4 "Transit Core" of the Northeast Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 2"); and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 1996 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5565 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 pertaining to eating and drinking.establishments in the Northeast
Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 3"); and
WHEREAS, on August 20, 1'996 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5574 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 relating to deleting a time limitation for churches in the Northeast
Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 4"); and
WHEREAS,. on January 11, 2000 the City Council. adopted Ordinance No. 5714 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 relating to self service laundries in the Northeast Area Specific Plan
("Adjustment No. 5"); and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2000 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5728 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to amend the boundaries of Development Area 5 (Commercial Area)
and Development Area 1 (Industrial Area) at the northwest comer of La Palma Avenue and Hancock Street in
the Northeast Area Specific Plan ("Amendment No. 1"); and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5761 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 relating to asphalt and concrete processing in the Northeast Area
Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 6"); and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2002 the City Council. adopted Ordinance No. 5767 amending Ordinance
No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 relating to requirements for freeway-oriented signs in the Northeast Area
Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 7"); and
WHEREAS, on August 6, 2002 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5817 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to allow hospitals as conditional uses Development Area 3 (La Palma
Core) and Development Area 4 (Transit Core) in the Northeast Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 8"); and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2003 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5865 amending
Ordinance No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to allow new vehicle conversions in Development Area 3 (La Palma
Core) in the Northeast Area Specific Plan ("Adjustment No. 9");
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2004 the City Council adopted Ordinanca No. 5923 amending Ordinance
No. 5517 and Chapter 18.110 to amend the Northeast Area Specific Plan (SP94-1) and its associated
Development Area (DA) boundaries to be consistent with the revised General Plan land use designations
proposed as part of the General Plan Update (Amendment No. 2).
WHEREAS, this City-initiated petition for Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Northeast Area.
Specific Plan (Anaheim Canyon Business Center) to amend the Development Area. boundaries for nine (9)
properties situated on 8.8 acres with frontages on Miraloma Avenue and Red Gum Street. Property addresses
include 1260, 1310, 1320, 1330 and 1340 North Red Gum Avenue and 2926, 2940, 2983 and 2985 East
Miraloma Avenue.
WHEREAS, as part of the General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431, the General Plan land use
designation for the area is proposed to change from General Commercial to General Industrial; and that this
amendment to the Northeast Area Specific Plan would amend the development area boundaries to reflect the
revised General Plan land use designations.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on July 10, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear
and consider evidence for and against said proposed Amendment No. 3 and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. That Development Area 1 is intended to provide for increased opportunities for a mix of light
industrial, corporate headquarters, and research and development uses with essential support services at
strategic locations; and that the underlying base zone used for land uses and development standards is "I"
(Industrial).
2. That Development Area 5 is intended to provide for and encourage the orderly development
of commercial retail areas throughout the Specific Plan Area which serve the demand for a wide variety of
goods and services; and that the underlying base zone used for land uses and development standards and is
"CG" (General Commercial).
3. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim
General Plan and with the purposes, standards, and land use guidelines therein, and will encourage high.
quality development compatible with the surrounding area
4. That the proposed amendment will result in development of desirable character and will
contribute to a balance of land uses, which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the
surrounding neighborhood.
_ _ 5. Given that the intersection of Miraloma Avenue and Red Gum Street is not a major
intersection, the subject properties are unlikely to attract quality commercial development in the future and are,.
therefore, better suited for industrial development consistent with the surrounding area.
6. That the proposed amendment respects environmental and aesthetic resources consistent
with zoning and development standards and with economic realities.
WHEREAS, On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City CounciV certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330") under Resolution No. 2004-94, and determined that said Final Environmental
Impact Report fully complies with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and is adequate to serve
as the environmental documentation for General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 and for future discretionary
actions described in Environmental Impact Report No. 330, including follow-up actions to correct errors and
omissions in the new General Plan where necessary; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the Anaheim
City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopt an
ordinance to reclassify the subject properties from Development Area 5 "Commercial Area" to Development
Area 1 "Industrial. Area" of Specific Plan No. 94-1.
July 10, 2006.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM }
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adapted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission
held on July 10, 200ti, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
.2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT NO. 2-B
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 Area 1
Land Use Element Combined Acreage - 5.49
RESIDENTIAL-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL C
LOW-MEDIUM ¢
W
RESIDENTIAL- ~ RESIDENTIAL-
CORRIDOR ~ CORRIDOR
LINCOLN AVENUE
r W
~] w 1 `~.
Y ¢
r J RE
~ a 7LC
RESIDENTIAL
LOW-MEDIUM _
~` ;
RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIC
OPEN SPACE-WATER
RESIDENTIAL-LOW
row nvE rownvE
5 a
OPEN
SPACE
1
u
rc
U
r
w
w
rc
z
0
m
z
SERENO PL
OPEN
SPACE
U
6cisting Land Use Designation
RESIDENTIAL•
MEDIUM w
RESIDENTIAL
LOW-MEDIUM m rc
u
w OPEN z
RESIDENTIAL- ~ RESIDENTULL- SPACE rc
CORRIDOR 'm CORRIDOR 5
UNCOLN AVENUE
rc
N
Z
N
O
W Z
Z
a
0
RESIDENTIAL LO W-MEDI UM
OPEN SPACE-WATER
SERENO PL
RESIDENTIAL{OW
rounvE Tow, p.~E OPEN
SPACE
5 RESIDENTIAL{OW ~
Proposed Land Use Designation
~;,Y ~ "5
p t
RESIDENTIAL- s "~,~ ~ ~ ~^^
CORRIDOR -x -,: '"
~ s
?~ .
Y'
+~~
V +
S
Ph+~`\ ~
13 .
9a.
` v'
~
'3 %~~ ~:~. OP EN
.~
°
RESIDENTIAL + 31R ESIDENTIA L
-
~
EOWaafEDIUM ~MEDIUM~
+ ~ z c ''
2181
EXHIBIT NO. 2-C
General. Plan Amendment IVo. 2005-00431 Area 2
Land Use Element Combined Acreage - 1.38
DENIER ST ('
S
g A
'Pyi ~ N Ai
~G "..:. a 9Z ~
90 GENERAL ~ RESID
COMMERCIAL y
2
9
T~
F
GENERAL ~~Z
. COMMERCIAL '9~
0.87 AC
INDUSTRIAL 5 ~ ~
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
'PARK
Y 0.51 AC
BROAOWP °q'k
~p:
y .:. V~.....
1 V
RESIDENTIAL S ~
LOWMEDIUM p i
O
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
LOW-MEDIUM
Existing Land Use Designation
A_ GE~ERS
`~/~°" g
0
'* GENERAL ~ ~ N'92
COMMERCAL ~
\\ RAILROAD RESIDE
9
a ~~
F~
9~
r
INDUSTRIAL ~5~;-. i~
GENERAL
COMMERCUL
RAILROAD
BFtOPOWPY ''4'eY
m m ~.~
N
RESIDENTIAL ~ fu'
LOW-MEDIUM o PARK
RESIDENTIAL
LOW-MEDIUM
Proposed Land Use Designation
2191
EXHIBIT NO. 2-D
General Plan Amendment Ido. 2005-00431 Area 3
Land Use Element Combined Acreage - 2.94
Existing Land Use Designation
RESIDENTIAL-LOW
auunru sr
RESIDENTIAL-LOW
-~~nz~x ~ ~; 9 PARKS
GENERAL ~~wrJ~'a ~~ '. ~~
COMMERCIAL c~.~ O
PUBLIC- ~ ~~~ ~
INSTITUTIONAL O
M~ ~~
~ }~ f ~ s
~' m
x
LA PALMA AVENUE
NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDEPITIAL
~
COMAfiERCIAL SCHOOL LOW'•MED RESIDENTIAL-
` LOW
Proposed Land Use Designation
2191
EXHIBIT NO. 2-E
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-0043'1 Area 4
Land Use Element Acreage - 0.62
RESIDENTIAL-
LOW
RESIDENTIAL-
MEDIUM
-,tr ~ OPEN SPACE
cO~~RESIDENTIAL-
N ~~ ' :,~~y LOW
o
-92 '.. °o
y °'~
X2,9 VERMONT PVE
T~
~~
~~ GENERAL
COMMERCIAL ~ COMMERCIAL
RECREATION s
Existing Land Use Designation
o
tP~ n~ ,r "~, ~O^
~~
nS F /
3 `~
'92~ VER~'ONS p,VE`
T~ 1
~~
~ GENERAL
COMMERCIAL ~ COMMERCIAL
.RECREATION 'J
Proposed Land Use Designation
2191
EXHIBIT NO. 2-F
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 Area 5
Land Use Element Acreage - 0.62
6cisting Land Use Designation
S\DE~'~\A,'
RE ~EO\V~
\.O~' Pg'lREET
SPN'(P PN
RFs~ ~
~ e:
F3ABLROAD ~`',~ O~G~ o ~
~: ~ m C ,
'~ a ~ r
a ~
E~t\p,~ Y~ `' a
Rom ~~p\V~
VV
\' `O P
Proposed Land Use Designation
2191
® e®
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431
Land Use Element
EXHIBIT NO. 2-G
Area 6
Combined Acreage - 7.1
T
~L
~{
N
a
A
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL 'ya
G
14 Na
A
O f
v ~5 rcn ~
S
-I
9 o
'
~ s
~
INDUSTRIAL
s
v
~r
'
2T is
92 ~
9.0 • ~ O MM
r J
/
GENERAL ~ i
RECREATION. ca rn
2
w
r
~
9L
F~cisting Land Use Designation
e
y~ c
N
a
GENERAL
COMMERCIAL ..
s ~'
t~ ~,
F "
~
~>
`a-~ "f.~~:-~~' 'y } .i~ PARKS
~`~j
~ ~
d ~y
F t `1 t~ ~
~~ 4f }}~~
`
`~'~~~
`~%r'} 1q Ya3
~
~ G
~
rx r.
+~ a~ .5~. Z a
s
~ ~~~~~, ~
..r N ~ T
f
? s3 ~~~ ~ ~ s#'~
~ ~
~ ~
~ '~' 's-
~~~Y'
~ ~~ ~ `~ k~~ :
r'~ ~
~
~ F
i
INOUSTRIAL
~
~
3~ ,
92 ~"`~ GEN
9,c `'='~ CGMM
~F~ Ja
9y U a0
'J
COMMERCIAL
~ m ~
~
RECREATION
OS
` a f
4`n
r N
FR 2
9
Proposed Land Use Designation.
2181
I ~ ®.. _ a.
EXHIBIT NO. 2-H
General Plan Amendment iVo. 2005-00431 Area 7
Land Use Element Acreage - 0.44
R~S1 ~~®1u~
R~SeDE~~~~.L° Low:
~-E®`u~
~`NGp~N PVE~U~ RES1D®~~~'~".
17
6Z~Stp~~'i~~` r SCHOOLS
ME~tV pG
Op pAR~S
V \
~S1DE~~IP~L' o SCNpO
R ~~p1U~ ~
Existing Land Use Designation
E~~~A~
FL~SI ~E®1u
~~~`pL. ~'D~'
~~S~Epiu~-
PvE~vE E~,~,~~.
``NCOLt.1 ~ES1D o`N
'_~~,~.
~~ RE3IDENTIAL-
~~~ nAED1UIVi
RESIDE~~1A~-' ~ ~~~.
~EpW~ ~~~~°~ p.C
~~~ ~` Op p~~~S
v ODD
s SCH
~~S,~L, o
RES~EpNM
Proposed Land Use Designation
2'181
EXHIBIT ND. 2-I
General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00431 Area 8
Land Use Element Combined Acreage - 8.80
M~~ \E \
5
~~
s
Existing Land Use Designation
1tJpU5jR\AL 1NpuSSR~A~
,A`
~NpUStR ~ rs. INDUSTRIAL
~ao~ ~s~r
-~ ;~a p \ SFt\AL
~ U
~ ~a ~
~~
~~a~ ~,
Vg(R~R'L
\P~p "~ ,~~ ~ ,
E
"
P PVEN~
,~
M1R1~'OM
6
~' 6 0
~~ ~ F a
~`~ , ~~~~1,~r a S'~R\A`
pV
~ g~ '1$~ a~~$„t~ a_ ~~
J ~
~~
~~°~°a
L
R1 ~
:
r `~ ~ ~'
~~
1~pV \
\ , .INDUSTRIAL.
~
~,-:_~
INDUSTRIAL 1PL
SSR`P`1. UE t~pUS ~
1P1pV ~ ,~„
,
~~ " 4
Proposed Land Use Designation
2181
® _. _. oo _
I
EXHIBIT NO. 2-J
General Plan Amendment fVo. 2005-00431
Land Use Element
Area 9
Combined Acreage - 2.33
PUBLIC-
O~
v
F~~'~\JP PGA
Se~
OQ~/~ , O°
A
Existing Land Use Designation
R
'(~~P~O
F~5 pG~
5e
A
Proposed Land Use Designation
2191
~ ~ -
Item No. 8
° ~
kG :~ ~~ xw e~ o C i si ww
~ $
~ °° 3O°
' .°°
r~ 3m ~'< mw W~ :m ~~ ~u~ ~~ i<
Z'< LL ~
Src u~c 3i;s
pgIJIGEM°gPE
AVENUE
IAPALAU
FVENUE
IINLOtN
AVENUE
flAU ~>
w~£
o
W
RWO ~_ 3 ~°
w~
u6 ¢
IUTEIU
AVENUE
CH4R/N.'
AVENUE
C~ :L
x~ 3m eag5 6~ p~C g~g g~g~ $
Si m~ 'w~ 3m 3~ G$g
~
p
w~~
Itl
~ s{ k'f
e
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046 t
K ~ Subject Property
TRACKINGNO. SPN2006-00041, TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00040 Date: July 10, 2006
TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00039, TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00038 Scale: Graphic
TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00037 Q.S. No. nla
Requested By: CITY OF ANAHEIM
Citywide toos2
® _ _ _
~ p
IV
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046
TRACKING NO. +:SPN2006-00041, TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00040
TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00039, TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00038
TRACKING NO. SPN2006-00037
Requested By: CITY OF ANAHBIM
Citywide
Subject Properly
Date: July 10, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. n/a
isoss
Date ofAedaLPhoto:
Jury 2005
.Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 8
8a. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL'IMPACT REPORT NO.330 {Previously Certified) (Motion)
6b. ZONING-0ODE AMENDMENT NO. 2006-00046 (Motion)
Tracking Nos. SPN2006-00037, SPN2006-00038, SPN2006.00039,
$PN2006-00040, and SPN2006-00D41
.SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) The proposed Zoning Code Amendment applies citywide.
PROPOSAL:
(2) This is aCity-initiated request (Planning Department) to amend various sections of Title 16
"Zoning" of the Anaheim Municipal Code to:
a. Correct various errors and omissions,
b. -Clarify text;
c. 'Provide consistency with other chapters of the Anaheim Municipal Code including
provisidhs related to bingo games and permitting trailers tobe parked in driveways;
d. increase encroachment allowances forpatios and canopies in the RS-3 and RS-4
Zones;
e. 'Allow the'Planning birector to approve refuse containers fully screened from public
''view in the front setback;
f. Provide more flexible criteria for architecturally enhancing building walls;
g. 'Allow additional commercial uses within the O-H Zone when fully integrated with. an
'?office building;
h. Provide a process for "Dwelling Unit Transfers" within certain areas of the PTMU
r(Platinum Triangle;Mixed Use}:Overlay;
i. rAdd "Community and Religious Assembly" to the list of uses permitted in a residential
structure'subject to a conditional use permit;
j. Modify Special Event Permit requirements;
k. 'Modify setbacks for certain locations along Anaheim Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue to
provide consistency with existing building setbacks;
I. .Change certain procedures related to the Zoning Administrator,
m. Provide an appealprocess for Planning Director decisions;
n. 'Provide an administrative review process for "Minor Modifications';
o. Streamline the Administrative Adjustment public hearing process;
p. Modify development requirements related to the implementation of the General. Plan
' CorcidorResidential land use designation;
q. Modify requirements for small collection recycling facilities;
r. `Modify sign standards forThe Disneyland Resort Specific No. 92-1 (Adjustment No. 6 -
'` SPN2006-00037);
.. .
s. Amend the Zoning and Development Standards for The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan:
No. 92-2 in their entirety to provide consistent formatting with Title 18 (honing Code)
along with minor modifications and clarifications (Adjustment No. 5 - SPN2006-
00038};
ZCA2006-00046 SR SK Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 8
t. Modify sign standards for the Hotel Circle Specific No. 93-1 (Adjustment No.2 -
SPN2006-00039);
u. Allow hospitals by conditional use permit in Development Area 4 and fast food and
.take-out restaurants as primary permitted uses in Development Area 5 of the Northeast
Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 .(Adjustment No.:10 - SPN2006-00040); and,
v. Provide a procedure for fence relocation in the Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific
Plan No. 87-1 (AdjustmehfNo. 1 - SPN2006-00041).
BACKGROU N DID ISCUSSI ON:
(3) On June t3, 2004, the City Council adopted a comprehensive update to Title 18 (Zoning
Code) for the purpose of implementing the Land Use Element of the nev/ General Plan,
updating the land uses and development standards, modifying the Zoning Code format to
make it easier to find land use and development information, and assuring that the code
complies with state statutes and other applicable laws. The updated Zoning. Code became
effective on July 8, 2004. Since then, fifteen Zoning Code Amendments have been
approved and two additionalZoning Code Amendments are currently under review, in
.addition to the subject request.
(4) At the time the Zoning Cade was comprehensively updated, it was anticipated that staff
would cohtlnue to review he code and,propose clarifications and enhancements as
needed. The Planning Director has initiated the proposed Code amendments identified in
paragraph. (2) of this report to correct errors and omissions, edd text to further clarify or
enhance existing code provisions and add new standards. A detailed discussion of each of
he proposed amendments is;provided ih Attachmeht A. A draft red-lined ordinance has
'.been provided to the Planning Commission and is also on file in the Planning Department.
(5) The Planning Director has initiated this amendmenf to Title 18 pursuant to subsection .020
(Text Amendment) of Section 18.76.030 (initiation) of Chapter18.76 (Zoning
Amendments). Thesubjecttequest includes amendments to five. Specific Plans (The
' Disneylahd Resort, Anaheim Resort, Northeast area, Hotel Circle and Highlahds at
:Anaheim Hills Specific Plans}: Pursuant to subsection 18.72.040.040 (Specific Plan
Adjustment) of the Zoning Code; modifications to Specific Plan Code`stahdards are
designated as Specific Plan Adjustments and processed in the same manner as Zoning
Code Amehdmenta
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(6) On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report
No. 330 ("FE[R") under Resolution No. 2004-94, and determined that said FEIR fully
complies with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and is adequate to serve
as the environmental documentation for Zoning Code Amendment No:'2004-00029 and for
future discretionary actions'described'in Environmental Impact Report No. 330, including
follow-up actiohs to correct errors and omissions, and to provide clarifications and
modifications to the new Zoning Code where necessary.
(7) Staff has reviewed the proposed Zoning Code Amendment.("Proposed Action"), as
summarized iq paragraph (2) and further detailed Jn Attachment A to.this staff report, and
_has determined. the FEIR No. 330, as previously certified. by the Gity Council for the
!General Plan and Zoning Code update and related projects, i adequate to serve as the
.:required environmental documentation for the Proposed Action and satisfies all the
requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental tlocumentation need be
prepared for the Proposed Action...
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
July 10, 2006
Item No. 8
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY:
(8) Section 18.76.020 of the Code provides that an amendment to the Zoning Code maybe
.made if it implements the Anaheim: General Plan and will. enhance and preserve the
general. welfare. The proposed Zoning Code Amendment, as summarized in paragraph (2)
and further detailed in Attachment A to this staff report, is in conformance with. and
.implements the General Plan, and will enhance and preserve the general welfare.
RECOMMENDATION;
(9) Staff recommends that unless additional or contrary information is received during the
public hearing, including the information in this staff report and the attachments hereto, that
.the Planning Commission takes the following actions:
(a) By motion, recommend .that the City Council, unless contrary evidence is received
.during the public hearing, find and determine that no additional significant effect will
- result from the proposal, no newmttigation measures or alternatives will be
required, and that the proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046 is
within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact. Report No. 330 prepared in
connection with Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, which was a
comprehensive update to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and
that Final EIR No. 330 is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Acf("CEQA") and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and. is adequate to serve as
the required environmental documentation for the proposed Zoning Code
Amendment and satisfy all the requirements df CEQA; and that no further
environmehtal .documentation need be prepared for the proposed Zoning Code
Amendment.
(b) By motion, recommend that the City Council adopt the Draft Ordinance provided to
'the Planning. Commission and on file in the Planning Department amending various
sections of the Anaheim Municipal Code for the reasons discussed in paragraph
(4) of this staff report and. based upon findings that the proposed amendments are
in conformance with and wilt implement the Anaheim General Plan and will
enhance and preserve the general welfare.
City of Anaheim
P~1-~IVl~i~l~G ~iG~A~t'I'l~lEl~T'g'
wwvtanaheim,net
July 10, 2006
City of Anaheim.
Planning Department
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Following is an excerpt from the minutes of the Anaheim. Planning Commission meeting of
July 10, 2006.
Sa. CEQA ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 330
(PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED)
8b ZONING CODE AMENDMENT N0.2006-00046
(Tracking Nos. SPN N0.2006.00037, SPN NO. 2006-00038, SPN NO. 2006-00039,
SPN NO.2006-00040, SPN N0.2006-00041)
Owner: City-Initiated
Location: Ci ide:
Request: City-initiated request (Planning Department) to amend various sections of Title
18 "Zoning" of the Anaheim Municipal Code to correct various errors and
omissions; clarify text; provide consistency with other chapters of the Anaheim
Municipal Code including provisions related to bingo games and permitting
trailers to be parked in driveways; increase encroachment allowances for
patios and canopies in the RS-3 and RS-4 Zones; allow the Planning Director
to approve refuse containers fully screened from public view in the front
setback; provide more flexible criteria for architecturally enhancing building
walls; allow additional commercial uses within the O-H Zone when fully
integrated with an office building; provide a process for "Dwelling Unit
Transfers" within certain areas of the PTMU (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use)
Overlay Zone; add "Community and Religious Assembly" to the list of uses
pernlttted in a residential structure subject to a conditional use permit; modify
special event permit requirements; modify setbacks for certain locations along
Anaheim Boulevard and. Lincoln Avenue to provide consistency with existing
building setbacks; change procedures related to the Zoning Administrator;
provide an appeal process for Planning Director decisions; provide an
administrative. review process for "Minor Modifications"; streamline the
administrative adjustment public hearing process; modify development
requirements related to the implementation of the General Plan Corridor
Residential land use designation; modify requirements for small collection
recycling facilities; modify sign standards for the Disneyland Resort Specific
No. 92-1 (Adjustment No. 6 - SPN2006-00037); amend the zoning and
development standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 in their
entirety to provide consistent formatting with Title 18 (Zoning Code) along with
minor modifications and clarifications (Adjustment No. 5 - SPN2006-00038);
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
P.O. Box 3222
Anaheim, California 92803
TEL (714) 765-5139
modify sign standards for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (Adjustment
No. 2 - SPN2006-00039); allow hospitals by conditional use permit in
Development Area 4 and fast food and take-out restaurants as primary
permitted uses in Development Area 5 of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No.
94-1 (Adjustment No. 10 - SPN2006-00040); and, provide a procedure for
fence relocation in the Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan No. 87-1
(Adjustment No. 1 - SPN2006-00041).
ACTION: Commissioner XXX offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner XmC and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim Planning. Commission has reviewed the proposal to
amend Title t8 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046)
and does hereby recommend that the City Council, find that Previously Certified
Environmental Impact Report No. 330 is adequate to serve as environmental documentation
far Zoning Code Amendment No. 2006-00046.
Commissioner XXX offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner mCX and MOTION
CARRIED, that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City
Council adopt the Draft Ordinance provided to the Planning Commission and on file in the
Planning Department.
Sincerely,
Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary
Anaheim Planning Commission.
ZCA2006-00046 Excerpt
0
z
E
d
w
c
m
E
r
v
m
~~
Ho
W°o
=o
U~
N
N
d'
Q O
O
C O
N c0
E°
U_O- _.
Q ``4444N77
V
Q O
O
C O
N (O
E°
L N . _...
U
Q N
`
4 .. + fi >
yJ r w
C N
NI
L O O
C~ T
(0 N
U
O
E c m
°' E N
~ c
rn~ ~~ O
c N L
a
c
~ D1 N a N
w R N N ~
L a
i
W
p N N 0
O C '
~` C N N N N
_ 3 O Q 7
E~ N .'
-' C
N C O O
C •
O
t -o ~ m i d
.~ O V-. n. c
7 a.-
-O N
C "O L N ..0.
L O ~
y..+~ "O
~-p C LO ..L..
N L
U D. ~ C
~ O
N
E m N~ .
.•
3 N m m
°~ va E E CNJ•N N
N U~ .
am
m~ o,~ -o ~ r
U `-o E vi ~ m ~ ~ c E o o m
O
~ w
'O
~ N
N
o~ ~ aci O. ~
°' O
m E~ p.
G
QN o o ~ O
$ a 3 'O -O
N °1 c V
N
~ ~•>
n.o m E in m
. o,o'- o ~'^ y
^,E d~ m oU
o c o
c we
°' m cmo N a
L
aair aNi > N,-° o ~
F- ~~.~ ~ E E 3N m:G m ~'
~
r
t:~ L •o o y ~ ~.N o ~ N ° ~ ac o~ ~p ~m
~ c
~ ~
~ ~ '
•-
~ >'
m
o Z a
i
in
°
v c °' N
~ o
°~
~
E ~
~ T ~°
p o N
°L ~ o
m ~~' ~ E yr`ti
°~
a
E7E7 :
-
m
~.E° ~
-o
~o~- ~
dE~~o
mE~
N o
~
UE~
o N 7 ~ ~ ° ~ '~ c m oii ~
iU •c aci =
~ ~ E~ eiC7:?
m m c o TU c N m N a
o-o v ~ E off. ow? m a
ornm
> • 10~O ~~o °~Emc •oa N°7Uf0 7rnL
i
a
'O °. ~' o o O N O U N~ C C O ~ N O ~ tl U
o ~ m m c
.c ~~ o ° ~ N o
a N a g>~
U
-° d ~~~
° y
~
N~ am am oco3 0- E3
°E vm
N N~ 'L" ~~ 3 Q w N ~ N' C w O C N U N w ~ N N~ N
~ •N "•' N w L C)
~'
M U
'O O ~ N N ?i L O
N N O y.
N
.-,
N N L
'0
a~EL
N N C
~._ °
"O C 01 N
~ c_ °N
l6 U
N o
N
' ~ .. .
°•-v N
N ~ N D •
FL c
U O
0
't~wm ~3~ C)
cn7
° ~~3c:a a
~~c >
~m
a
Q 'o>
N
o dvt Z,o 0 n
1
0 ~ ~ rns c o o ° ~
v
2~E mo •
Na m
Uo°o mwr
m co~o o
rn•°cc~ co°~
E oEd3
° Nv•U
~a~N E. o~c
° o~va~N ~
d Eo~o!-
° ~o~w
°E~N
c a~m °.-
:9~ • om~?~°
as ~ oUU
d :omm
a
m ¢oE°
N
c N ~ N _
N p
N E U N Q
C O O N C
T
~
• W N x
__ ~ „°-, C Q 0 0 fN
W
O p m
«L.
C U
•C d l0 p O w .
~ O
U O V O d E. O N C N
V
N > O
W
d .
Z ` N
o
°• m ~
o ~
~
N U '" a o- U a~ o ~ 3 m
~ F- o .o m
N
N t~
O v
N d
O
V m
c
N w N C
'O O N. V A C +•'
7
V U N O N
•O N
N O U N YO
U U Vl N N N E
N
~
Y
U
.. w
(0 O L IO
N d C ~ O
O C d N~ a
~
N O Q f0 (~ _
rL-.
y
~ 7.
N N
~da?N N«
E
E N
E~~~ E°=Lm ~
E~c E L_
E• m
o~N?~ y
Q•om
¢a~O «
Q~..L
¢lO7 V ~
Q °
¢30.~
Q N
Q CO
~
f0 ~ W W
N r O N
~
I M O O h F-
~ O O
O O O
O O O O O O
OJ GO p ~ aD W
r ~ r r r r
O r N M V'
.. ~ l'- ~ ~ l". T
M
a
a°
°
~~
~~
E°
L ° _,.
Q
a
a°
°
~~
~~
E°
L Q . _...
p ~Q`J
lC
QN
-p C ro > O N '~ `p ro N
C N w ro ~ - C
~3•E ij E m w `m v ro E ~x m m.= m L n~•~
coa~i ca.c }ro~omo~m 3-o•`m mow
` ~ ..
00 •°viW E cyo~•om•°cE om~ 3mEy
E2.3 n~'roa y~~.cmEN~ro o~~0 °n~~
U N O N~ fn .C pM N ro U ro Cl~ ~ •C 3 .LO+ w~ O ro
~•~oo~~c~ ~oroN ,~9c.o w c °O
N °o r~ °' .nroc myc vmNc
rov n~ aci °? U nro c N o m^ro ~= m
° N.Z`O E~ c a m m N ro w cY y E ro m o~
^y ~ y 'O m c 7 ro 7 m ~'~ m O .N ° m ,~• O N .> > .D N
c• c'c ~ ro3. roc W
° mF ro o ro oU ° `m.-°n m ai aMi~ ro croi ~ c °~D ~ a
~ Ur ~~ o o b a9 •~ ~ ~.c m o nay °' m
2duiU~3c to3.nodc=lnF- o°m o~nn
v1c~o~°~m o0~'vim>~iaroiE S. •O U` 5mN
mc°~°~ m°a; d'cu°cairo¢mQc m.om cN°
N w- ~' y~ N o ro N° c m ~ N w o~ c
acica>° mcmc ct°~coimmowmro "nL E °a-miE
•v_ O«N. v•- ac ~ ro ° ro v cL ~a 4 ~• ~ ~. v
N~~ ~ O .Op O O.. ~ O~y O J.'3 ~dt Ol fLn N' Qw `• N
~~ E N'mA~ o m,=~in c ~ ~ ~ N c ro° ~' E
ro N ~ ~ w.. ~ N .~. •O O V ro C ~ O u.- •~ ro ~ O) ~ ro
O ~ ~ O ~ N N ~ (n "ro0 Y+. C ,roO ~ N O .N., C +' O ~Y L .0.
ro ~ m m E=o ,~, c ro~ ~ c•NO~ c oY v `m ro~
~ n3t c a~ N inUL%.~ mC $~ E ~ c ~ dL$
m ~vz ~ m d ~ ~ c~,c m c.o c ~ ~.~.N ~ o¢
.`~ WQm~ rom.c~¢omaQ Ocd •-mE>,
d,~J3-mNd EEroE-ov~a~ oo ~•-Nro
ro romc• ~ ro'Q33
Eo0 ~.~ c o° moo ° J a mY o o Z ,v_
E N ~~ ro cw m o o~ ro~ ~U v o E m c m ~o ro
od°Na~~a m> Nnon~ro -ocnroa~romc m
V ~,~ .N va o m ~ d N ro vL o v a ~ c a. ~~ v
O C7 U C O N N N ~ Q C nN-. O O A C_ tOA O C C p O .~' N ro
r..'C.-. N V N Lp ~ N O~ ,~ N O C ro E ro 7 V ~ O U O w = 0
~° E.'~ o n o c ~~ EoE a o m ~cc y E m ~i~~~
m~ E€che.;oL °'00m~:mm3ro>`'rootnd: om
~.nU ro'~ ~ N n oU'vo'g ~ a>i~ ~ m¢ o ~U ro~ c~ N
O N 3 o
~ N ~.w O "'~ N Nd. ~~ Om d Ny UN OlO U O.L..O~
dQ acid ~w n.a ~~ ~ m a°i Ew oL~~°Y ~ ~ ~~° °
fn fn (~ N ~ N
N7"ON N~N.N ndNNLy~Cro NO)Q N[JOO
•ooU' •o3roO3vroLNVroro ro>•oc c~B E
c'rnU`o c•- rne.o cL ° ro c c rov d a~ c~ ro ro c ~°• n .
a~ ._ c d € ~ o '> m U ro E ro ¢ .o > ~ o ro .c ~ v °' n. •S
Q~wUQd v ~~Q oQ ni¢ ° ccadamQ m.n mQco~ a~i~n
o
0 0
0 0 0 0
r
O N
O N
O ~
O
r O O O O
N
O
~'
M
M
VO'
~
~h
V'
¢ O OC [O N GO CO CO
C 4 ~ ~ ~- 'r ~- ~-
d O
Eo
U
~_. _. N N N M m c'9
Q N
U7
0
O C O
n ~ U
U d ~
a~~
O C
O 'gyp N
01
U ~° N
~ U
~ N
a m =
(6
~ N
N N U
c O ~
° Nv
o' °~ c
N U N
d N
O yN N
a ~ N
o ° 3
0) U..
C N C
:D a a~
m m E
J O C
~ ~ N
m°?cEa
me °
_C '- 'O
~•NU
nv. ~ m
N O O
~~
m
d m ~
~Uw
m
'C C w
° ~ c
c c ,E
Ec°1
¢w ~
M
(h
l0 l0 N f0
i
cn ~ ~ n
N
O
O
O
Q O
C O
E$
U _..
Q ~.
O O O O O D O
l0 T T M d T N
O 0 0 0 0 0 0
C 0 0 0 0 O C
000 00
0 0
N N (VNN NN
V' st <Y ~}' d' V' V
OC OO CU 0.U 47 QD ED
T T T T T T T
M P M O
C
7 '7 c
7
y
U1 C
o
N ~.
6 C p w O
O
W O .'C. !n
N
v ~ O C O
_ _ f0 l9
N C O O U
°
N 'p O N
E° mmv
7 ~ C ~ ~
E c y m€
.N ~ .O O N
E~ ~~ a
m a'-> a~
v d E o a.m
j a V1 U O r
Q y ' N .+ U
a rna °'ti o
~ d
o m ~.~~
N m E o.€ o
cEcon~
N ~'y N ~ ~
m~a~c E
Ew ° E.°
~ (p C
N N U d
N U +L-' J (CO f0
~ o~ I a>v
C ~
C L V~ N N
c 3~O °~ o
rn ~ ~ m
~ ~ C m ~ N
a~
°~N Eo~~l=-
or~N~~;
v o ° ~ r o
~ad~3'N
r d o T c o
o . o o ~ $
mU ~ °'°
inEcin!=-o
N N U U
N ~ ~ N N
c w V C W C
° ~ m °~~ t
QwFt-Q m v
T {J
V
~ O
T T
r~Oi ~ r°~i
N ~ ~
y o m
~ y o
N .O
C ~ N ~
N C N
O N ~ ~r0. U
.O ~ O L 7
a~ ya.p m E
m`--d~3'
o ~•~ m~
~ U ._ O'rp~
C ~ 0~ a0.. .D
'O N ~ N T .p.~
3 ~ `1 "O - N
c c c
m o o. >. ~ o
•~ f0 N ,Lj U c
E m o ~ o~
o a~ U .-~
com~'cc
O = ~ (0 ~ O
~ O y N «.
f~ p C N d N
~w->>n
~a
~ C C N f0 N
m ~ E ~ ~
y~c~~~E
~ Q
~ ~ m E E a
~~n 3 ~'~ aci
C
m ~ ~ O O vl
O N N w w
ry= a~ aao
~:oEmy..
C 'O N N L
~yaci>>
c w+ E"v~.c
0~10~~Oc
•-
v .,.,
C y O O N
~ " O ~O O O
N ~ ~ ~ 'O
m 3 °'tv` c
E-°zm~m
a~~~r~
T
a
a~
0
~~
~~
E~
t ~_...
U
Q N
0 0 0
O M ~ N
C~. N ~
'1 ~`7
O O ~ ~ 'r O O
d' V O ~ O O ~ N
D
( O
C C
D O
(
O
Q O
CD
N
O
W
O
O
O
C O
N O
Ea
QN
0
v
Qo
c°
dm
E~
~ ~ ...
ro ..
aN
~ O .. p 0 O Q7 ,.•C., y~ C N
U N
w~ ~ ~ co•o•rna m o mU voir m n..~ N
v S. N 'c o.~ •oo ~ cUE Ucovi
'O E .O C 7 T N N C C ~ O O ~. w a N
(0 a O O d a 'O O (6 t~ O. Z 0) ~ .N O O U W 'C
m N - c. c~ c ocoo
~ w y0 O ~ N~ O~ W~ O ~ f6 -O ~ N C m d O V N
y~ ~ c o rn s ~ c c m d '> w 'n d ._ cA N c N
° E U .~ . m 0 U~ O c E O 'C o --
c~ c ~•~~~ E coo- .~ m oao°
ao €a ~3~'0o nr~cmamN~c ~wEo
C T td ~ T¢ T E h N N n •-• ~ w E C S O N
N C N N ~ N. ~ CO U W N ~. f0 (0 (0 C O ,~ C:
Ec cm o=E~~ ~aca~e~mNCn. m d'v,
c E O
~ m °~ o ~u`0.N a°ci a~v~ `mU 07 ~•¢r°.. m ~ m'~
o > co U' :c. ad Tm ~~in~,~ ~'~ ~:~w coma
a>i m w.s c m rnm ~ nca o. ~ d c o y o p
w c a m 'emo m c o t~ o~ ~w
D. o m o c
mN~o3 -°mU>m °'oc°~o~~°OUo °~TO~
m ad.U aci °'m mO m: NZO o00 o m,Z•y F ~ ~ v
3 m Q ~n.w o co ~rUa U '~ t N
v~aci-°.~ oca~"2~ Nd~a~w~c°a~o ~c~io,o
X M
~3Eoc°~ °E~~aci 5o~~~F='c~wm ~°o
r .o^"' ma~'cE v`•c o °ooa~>.wcm °.
y C~~FFOC„_•,00Nm ~d0"-NO Ndfn a.N'~~mNN
IO [0 0 C •N O N> ~° a 7 ~ O' U N~ C Y N N E N N N L t
` ~p d ~ m o- aU O~v 1°w.r 3 c• E-oL me
LmmaEmoO Em .p`~.N000aoF-~v'E~~ro
pyQ,w. o i°:nmt2-°o m=w d~~-__~ m ~i°U ° d dM.
U' oa o d o m E 3 U o a~ ~-~ E
~ ~ m= mN U m~U o•°~ °~ c m o.v v° o c c E d m
00 ~c~ c~Qoo .c~~°? Erncoia•Oi'~~ °~EEo
L''~a 3 c.oc o a.>.~.~ °~¢v c ao of c a~ m~•X c c
p. m ~v f° o•ccnEwa ~ m m-Y~- ='' o.Ua `gyp f6 E o
°L~U~m~aoiyc~ ov -~°~~°co•rnaf0im~~Eg'o
o +..v m a c^~ .~ao ca c C~ •~.
v m c o. o m w -° r a °
~~mc~OO,cvrnNcm ~sm,Em•o°a~~m~'pQNCa
NNCOCCm UEd rno >.....3 Od om
or-mr w c Ua E •yo
OUN.O+7>O.NCNC OOfn '00.O.wL OO'O> ONN
•~~oLU....LO•d~f0 ~~occoiN~Uoy~ooX~cm
U GI
(gocU.~aciUti3mo cn°r°Em~co>c°ia>i~ovW ~~`
o
mo~.mUEwo~a~ Nan m c_°'~oN~~o
vc v°'ovN>;:~a~_ vp~o~~OVmmFom•oNCw
c. -c c c c ~ o.n~•- aci> m ~ c a~ ~rn~ d
y -o 0 o r o >.'- 'v E d
E`oaNiE>,EEcmo°oE.~OCa>ioEQ inf0aoo Eoacic=i
Q 3-oQa mQQLL U ~NQUO ¢ a~ (pdr m¢Z:4
o °
m n
i m
0 0 0
O
O O O M LL
'7 c0 ~
r C'') r O O r r
O O N O N :mot ""
O ~
d' ~ (
p m r r .C
¢ p 07 'CO OJ W o~ CO K
C O r r r r r r W
i
N (D
Eo
o ___
r
o
~
°
r
m
m ~ ' u
i m c
o
~U
QN
r
N
T
Q O
_ Q
C O1
E~
=o,
~ ~..
QN
a
a~
0
~°
mm
~o
r o ._._
N
~U
Q N