Loading...
1968/06/25 68..347 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. r- I I f Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend John D. Robinson, of the East Anaheim Methodist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 28, 1968, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless af- ter reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $708,248.59, in accordance with the 1967-68 Budget, were approved. I CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-67 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1019: Submitted by Edward and Vivian Simoneaux, Ephrem and Rose A. Laplante, and Emily E. O'Keefe, requesting a change in zone from R-l to C-l and permission to establish an automobile service station within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waivers of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone, and maximum permitted sign height; property briefly described as those lots fronting on the east side of Magnolia Avenue, between Crescent Avenue and Glencrest Avenue, (604, 608 and 612 North Magnolia Avenue.) Public hearing was continued from the meetings of May 7th and June lIth, at the request of the applicant, and again continued to this date to allow for the redesign of plans as recommended by the City Engineer. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l05, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l06, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1019. r ! Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property, ad- vising that the application encompasses three R-l zoned lots. He reported on the current zoning and uses in the immediate.vicinity. In summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Thompson noted that subject property was recommended in the "Front-On Study" to be re- tained for residential use. It was also noted that a service station use was one of the heaviest uses that could be interjected into a basically residential area. Revised plans, together with report thereon, were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr. Thompson noted that Crescent Avenue was presently being considered for recommendation as a secondary highway, and if subject applications are considered favorably, the City Engineer recommends that 45 feet be acquired along the north side of Crescent Avenue. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, referred to a map indicating existing uses in the immediate area, noting three cor- ners of the intersection of Magnolia and Crescent Avenues were used, or projected for use other than residential. 68-348 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Letters of approval, subject to the erection of a masonry wall, were submitted from the two property owners easterly of subject property. Also sub- mitted was a petition of approval, containing 2l signatures. Mr. Knisely advised of a meeting with the City Traffic Engineer, for the purpose of exploring the hazards created by the service station develop- ment. He reported, in the opinion of the Traffic Engineer, there could be no safer use for this corner because of the sight distance afforded. He noted that in one of the petitions of opposition reference was made to the accident rate at this intersection, and Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that the proposed service station would help alleviate this problem. He stated that of the 230 service stations within the City, 16 of which are located across from schools, not one accident had been reported. n . The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion. Mrs. Annetta Sands, 705 North Hanover Street, addressed the Council in opposition, fearing for the safety of the children in their tract going to and from school. Regarding the accident report, Mrs. Sands advised that her own daughter had been hit by a car in front of the Standard Station across from subject property. Letters of opposition received by the City Clerk, together with pe- titions of protest purportedly containing 9l signatures, were referred to. In rebuttal, Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that the issue in the matter was safety, and was of the further opinion that the development of the service station would add to the safety of the intersection by providing greater sight distance. There being no further evidence submitted, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. n Councilman Clark related opposition expressed to him by the Princi- pal of the Peter Marshall School and the teachers, and the President of the P.T.A., who advised that it had been voted by their membership to oppose S4b- ject request. He further noted the three existing homes on subject property, di- rectly adjoining others and felt that the service station situation within the City was not so critical that existing uses should De aDandoned in order to secure additional locations. Councilman Clark being an operator of a service station, located at the corner of Magnolia and La Palma Avenues, to clarify his position, stated he, as a Councilman, would never oppose a service station use when all these various variances from the Code are not required for its establishment. To further clarify his position, he reported that directly across the street from the service station he operates is an available corner on which a station could be established without variances and conditional use permits, and he would be the first on the Council to offer a resolution approving the use, if such a use was requested, recognizing the use would be in direct competition with his operation. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-338: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-338 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-67. Refer to Resolution Book. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-67.) Roll Call Vote: 68-349 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton and Krein None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-338 duly passed and adopted. n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-339: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-339 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 1019. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1019. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton and Krein None The Mayor declared Resolution No.6 8R-339 duly passed and adopted. On the above action, Councilmen Dutton and Krein advised that their vote was based on the fact that the two adjacent property owners to the east approved of the requested use; Crescent Avenue is scheduled to become a secon- dary highway, and considering other uses in the area, were of the opinion that to deny subject request was to deny a use to the property presently en- joyed by others in the area. I PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. l026: Submitted by Arno H. Stovall, Jr. and Dorothy Wileman, requesting pennission to establish an automatic carwash with accessory gas pumps on property presently zoned C-l, located on the west side of Western Avenue, south of the centerline of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l37, .denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Thompson, with the aid of a map posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, noted the location of subject property, the use and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence considered by the City Planning Commission and the basis on which the permit was denied. Mr. Thomp- son further reported that since the City Planning Commission action the ap- plicant has submitted new plans, indicating that lights will be directed away from the apartment complex to the south, and a provision has been made to take care of the landlocked parcel to the west, by providing a 25-foot access to Western Avenue. Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. rl ~ I Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants, reported I that eighty percent of the City Planning Commission's concern was related to the landlocked parcel to the west. He further advised that the particular unit is new to California, and reported on his inspection of a similar unit in Reseda. In explaining the operation he reported that this was a one-man operation, operating from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. There are no brushes or blowers. The final rinse is an ironized solution, and the vehicle air-dries itself, and the important factor is that no sound can be heard ten feet from the side of the unit, the only sound is from the front. Pictures of the proposed unit were presented. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 68-350 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-340: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-340 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1026, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval, and then be record- ed in the office of the County Recorder. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That any lighting proposed on subject property shall be directed away from the property lines, to protect the residential area immediately to the south. 4. That Condition No.1, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued, or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 5. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, and Plot Plan, marked Revision No.1, in- dicating a 25-foot access on the north to the property to the west. 7. In the event it is determined at a later date to install a me- chanical drying system, prior approval must be obtained from the City Plann- ing Commission and the City Council. n Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1026. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None n Roll Call Vote: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-340 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-73 AND VARIANCE NO. 1970: Submitted by Palmer Sandeno, et al, requesting change of zone as follows: PARCEL 1: From C-l to R-3. PARCELS 2 and 3: From County R-4, 6,000 and PD-4,000 to R-3 ReQuestin2waivers of: 1. Minimum building setbacks 2. Location of accessory buildings 3. Minimum distance between buildings 4. Maximum distance of living unit from standard street for the construction of a 73-unit apartment complex on approximately three acres of land, briefly described as located on the south side of Orange Ave- nue, west of Brookhurst Street, (County territory included in proposed Orange- Thistle Annexation.) The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l46, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: n 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Orange Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orange Avenue,for street light- ing purposes. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Orange Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 4. That the subject property shall be annexed to the City of Ana- heim prior to sewer or water services being provided to the subject property. 68-35l City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with within a period of l80 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. n \ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l47, granted subject variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 67-68-73. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That the existing driveway aprons and/or depressions which are not to be used shall be removed and replaced with standard curb and gutter and shall be installed along Orange Avenue, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the of- fice of the City Engineer. 5. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. land 2, Revision No.1. r With the aid of a Sectional Zoning Map, Mr. Thompson noted the loca- tion of subject property, the zoning, and existing oses in the immediate area. In summarizing the hearing before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Thompson reported that the plans indicate that the property is to be developed in two phases, the first phase being 65 multiple-family units, and the second phase; four additional units on the westerly portion of subject property, with all two-story construction along the easterly portion of the property and away from single-family residences. Mr. Thompson noted the Revised Plot Plan Exhibits land 2, Revision No. l, indicate peripheral circulation. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion. Mr. Kenyon, 9502 Greenwich Street, reported that the planned resi- dential development would be less density than what is now requested and, in his opinion, the entire area should have remained in the R-l zone. He noted the estimated value of the residences in the area, and called attention to the high-speed traffic on Orange Avenue, advising that one of the problems created, should the R-3 zone be approved, would be ingress and egress to the apartment complex. Mr. Kenyon called attention to the drainage problem on Orange Ave- nue which, in his opinion, would be aggravated if subject property drained out to Orange Avenue. Mr. Henry Fredricks, de~eloper of subject property, advised that the project is mostly one-bedroom apartments and is an all-adult complex. r There being no further evidence submitted, Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 68R-34l: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-34l for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance to change the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-73 - 68-352 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Parcels 1, 2 and 3- R-3.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-341 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-342: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-342 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1970, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1970. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-342 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-81: Submitted by David H. and Ruth McConnell, et al, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-2, 5,000; pro- perty briefly described as located north of Ball Road, east of Knott Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. PC68~148, recommended said reclassification, subject to a Final Tract Map of subject property being approved by the City Council ~nd recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Mr. Thompson noted location of subject property, comprising ap- proximately 2-1/2 acres and summarized the evidence submitted to and con- sidered by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-343: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-343 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Com- mission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLtJliI.PN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-81 - R-2, 5,000.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-343 duly passe~ and adopted. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6146. REVISION NO. l: Developer - J.M. McMichael Company, tract located north of Ball Road, east of Knott Avenue, and contains l6 pro- posed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots, (Reclassification No. 67-68-8l,) was submitted and approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. n 1 l I I ~ . I 68-353 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-82 AND VARIANCE NO. 1977: Submitted by Thomas H. Vetter, M.D., requesting a change of zone from R-l to C-l; pro- perty located at 1701 South Euclid Street, and requesting waiver of minimum landscaping and required number of parking spaces to permit an office use of a residential structure. n l The City Planning Commission recommended denial of said reclassi- fication, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-149, and denied said variance, pur- suant to Resolution No. PC68-l50. Mr. Thompson noted location of subject property, the zoning and existing uses in the immediate area. In summarizing the hearing held be- fore the City Planning Commission he noted the findings on which the recom- mended denial was based. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the City Coun- cil. Dr. Vetter, 1592 Orangewood Avenue, advised that his office was in the Ana-Grove Medical Group, directly across the street from subject property and has been for approximately seven years. He advised that he was an ear, nose and throat doctor, and his practice was limited to approxi- mately fifteen to twenty patients per day. He reported that subject pro- perty is directly across the street from property granted C-l zoning. Dr. Vetter stated that at the present time the house is rented, however, the family will soon be moving because of the noise and traffic on Euclid Street, and he would like to remodel the structure into a type of facility similar to Dr. Robb's office, across the street, and at no time had he seen a parking problem on Dr. Robb's property. n I Pictures of the house transformed into Dr. Robb's office, and also of the house on subject property were submitted for review. Dr. Vetter assured the Council that the use of the property would be strictly for a medical office, and the C-l zoning was not necessary if the use could be accomplished by variance. If zoning is necessary to ac- complish the use, Dr. Vetter stated he would be willing to have it revert back to R-l zoning, if ever sold, or the medical office use discontinued. He further advised that the property was purchased so that the office would be established when his son was ready to enter the medical profession. Mr. B.C. Adams, Architect, 12765 Brookhurst Street, Garden Grove, explained plans of development, including landscaping. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Clark advised that his personal investigation in this matter showed that the medical office would be an asset to the area, and that parking would be no problem because of the highly restricted practice. In answer to Council inquiry, Mr. Geisler stated it was his opin- ion that legally the City Council can grant a variance for any purpose, however, a variance or zoning, runs with the land. r Councilman Krein was of the opinion that to continually approve this type of request would ultimately defeat obtaining high-rise office buildings in the City. Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that parking provisions were similar to those across the street. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-344: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-344 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-82. Refer to Resolution Book. 68-354 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. l:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-82.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None n The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-344 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-345: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-345 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1977, to be limited to a medical office only, restricted to two employees and one doctor, and further subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land, 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Euclid Street, including a IS-foot radius corner return for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Euclid Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engin- eer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfac- tory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot, along Euclid Street, for tree plant- ing purposes. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 6. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from abutting parcels. 7. That the structure shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the uniform Building, Plumbing and Electrical Codes, as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 8. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, and shall be complied with prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. 10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2, and 3. 11. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. n Refer to Resolution Book. n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1977. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton and Krein None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-345 duly passed and adopted. n l \ r r I 68-355 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. l:30 P.M. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a IS-minute recess. Councilman Pebley sec- onded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:25 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-83: Submitted by Don W. and May H. Burdick, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-l; property located at the northwest corner of Falcon Street and Niobe Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l83, recommended said reclassification unconditionally. Mr. Thompson noted location of subject property and summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. Douglas Spencer, an interested party was present, however, of- fered no objections. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-346: Councilman putton offered Resolution No. 68R-346 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-83 - R-l.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-346 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-85 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1028: Submitted by G.L. Harbour, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3; pro- perty briefly described as located on the north side of Burton Street, west of Acacia Street, and requesting waiver of minimum distance between build- ings for a proposed IS-unit apartment complex. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l39, recommende4R,.-2 zoning,.:s,3bject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Burton Street, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a cul-de-sac with a minimum radius of 40 feet for the extension and terminus of Blossom Lane. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Burton Street and Blossom Lane, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drain- age facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Burton Street and Blossom Lane, for street lighting purposes. 68-356 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Burton Street and Blossom Lane, for tree planting purposes. 6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of l80 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. n The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l40, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 1028, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 67-68-85. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. land 2; provided, however, that Blossom Lane is cul-de-saced and the parking area is revised as necessary and still comply with Code required parking. Mr. Thompson noted location of subject property, compr~s~ng approxi- mately 1-1/2 acres, for a proposed one and two-story planned residential de- velopment. In summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commis- sion, Mr. Thompson advised that the Commission felt the R-2 zoning, with the conditional use permit, would accomplish the development as requested, and provide for a transition from the single-family homes to the south and east, and the industrial land to the north, in the City of Fullerton. 1 The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Wayne Carter, 1428 East Burton Street, addressed the Council, on behalf of residents on Burton Street and Blossom Lane. He referred to the petition of protest, filed with the City Planning Commission, and objected to the proposed reclassification for the following reasons: 1. The developer of the proposed project you1d not be obligated to conform to the same building regulations that they were required to. 2. Increased traffic in the area, to the detriment and danger of children. 3. If the apartment units were rented with school-age children, it would result in an increase in the school population. 4. The accessibility of the nearest Fire Station being approxi- mately two miles from the area. Slides of typical homes in the area were shown,as well as what Mr. Carter deemed to be a typical apartment complex. In conclusion, Mr. Carter felt the present regulations should be retained, and the property remain in the R-l zone; however, if the reclassi- fication and use is approved, it will be their request that the proposed alley be designated as a public alley. l Discussion was held relative to development of subject property as an R-l tract, and it was noted that five to seven lots could be developed. Mr. Frank Campione, l45l East Burton Stree~, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that he was a commercial artist and purchased in this area for the sole reason that it was a quiet neighborhood where he could work out of his home. 68-357 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. l:30 P.M. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council in rebuttal. n Mr. Frank :_:L~:121ena, Agent representing the owner, advised that they agree with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and Staff, and was of the opinion that the proposed project would be an excel- lent buffer for the industrial area at the north, the freeway to the south, the apartments to the east, and the flood control channel and industrial property to the west. He stated that they have agreed with the residents on Blossom Lane to cul-de-sac the street, and were willing to designate the alley either a private or public alley, whichever was requested by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, relative to the possi- bility of the property being developed into five R-l lots. At the conclu- sion thereof, Councilman Clark offered necessary resolutions denying Reclas- sification No. 67-68-85 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1028. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Clark Dutton, Krein and Pebley None Said resolutions failed to carry. r Discussion continued, and in reply to Mayor Pebley's inquiry, Mr. Thompson reported that the City Planning Commission favored R-2 zoning, be- cause this would be a rather low-density, planned residential complex, and would conform to all Site Development Standards of the R-2 zone. In addi- tion the City Planning Commission was of the opinion that because of the odd shape and size of the parcel it would be rather difficult to develop. Mayor Pebley again reviewed said plans. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-347: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-347 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone to R-2, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the condition that the alley remain a private alley, with dedication of necessary easements to the City for City services. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-85 - R-2.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NO ES : ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Pebley Schutte and Clark None r The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-347 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-348: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-348 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1028, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the provision that the alley remain a private alley, with dedication of necessary easements to the City for City services. Refer to Resolution Book. 68-358 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1028. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Pebley Schutte and Clark None n The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-348 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 99 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-87. VARIANCE NO. 1981: Pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l43, The City Planning Com- mission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 99, in accord- ance with Exhibit "A", proposing a change in land use symbology from Commer- cial-Professional to medium-density residential; property bounded on the west by Magnolia Avenue, on the east by Gilbert Street, on the south by Lincoln Avenue, and on the north by Savanna High School. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-87 AND VARIANCE NO. 1981: Submitted by Erich and Alma Winger, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3, and requesting waivers of maximum building height, location of accessory buildings, minimum distance between buildings, and maximum distance of a living unit from a standard street, to permit l45-unit garden apartment complex; property lo- cated on the east side of Magnolia Avenue, north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l44, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-87, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed m the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Magnolia Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2.That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineer- ing requirements of the City of Anaheim along Magnolia Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satis- factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Magnolia Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Magnolia Avenue, for tree plant- ing purposes. 5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is is- sued. 6. That Condition Nos. l, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- ther time as the City Council may grant. l The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l45, granted Variance No. 1981, subject to the following conditions: n l. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-87. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. n I r I r n I I 68-359 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2; provided, however, that 15 of the carports ad- jacent to the golf course located along the north property line are removed, and that the areas around each of the entrances into the project shall be opened up by the elimination of carports as necessary, in order to assure adequate open area for fire-fighting equipment as required by the Fire De- partment, and stipulated to by the petitioner. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing land uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submit- ted at the City Planning Commission hearing; that the petitioner stipulated to the removal of l5 carports along the north property line, in order that the aesthetic beauty of the golf course might become visible from subject property. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the General Plan Amendment. Mr. John Thorstensen, 125 North Gilbert Street, spoke in opposi- tion to the General Plan Amendment, noting the existing traffic conditions in the area. He felt that Lincoln Avenue is more suited to commercial de- velopment. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLJ .'ION NO. 68R-349: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-349 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No.'99, Exhibit "A", as recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 99, EXHIBIT "A". Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-349 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-87 AND VARIANCE NO. 1981: Plans and files were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Donald Severa, Fredricks Development Corporation, 524 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, advised they were in agreement with the City Planning Commission's recommendations, and that the applicant would elimin- ate the required carports to afford a complete view of the golf course. At the conclusion of Council discussion, regarding the fencing re- quirements adjacent to the golf-course property, the Mayor asked if anyone present was in opposition to the proposed reclassification. There being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-350: Council~an Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-350 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended :JY the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-87 - R-3.) Roll Call Vote: 68-360 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-350 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-351: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-35l for adoption, granting Variance No. 1981, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the additional condition as follows: That fencing be provided adjacent to the golf course, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE, CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1981. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-35l duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-86 AND VARIANCE NO. 1979 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5162): Submitted by Everett H. Miller, requesting zone changes on Portion No.1, from R-A to C-l, and Portion No. 2 from R-A to R-3; on Por- tion No.2, requesting waivers of minimum floor area per dwelling units, maximum number of main buildings per building site, minimum number of re- quired parking spaces, and maximum height of fences in front yard setbacks, to permit a 224-unit apartment complex; property located north of Ball Road, on the east side of Brookhurst Street. The City Clerk submitted correspondence dated June 17, 1968, from Baseline Development Company, which owns approximately two acres of land to the west and across the street from subject property, stating no objection to subject reclassification. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l4l, recommended said reclassification for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed excepting window- mounted units, shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. The City Planning Commission recommended said variance be granted, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l42, subject to the following conditions: l. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-86. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2, and 3; provided, however, that a 3-foot strip of landscaping shall be planted at the terminus of the stub-end of Minvera Avenue. 1 1 n 68-361 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. l:30 P.M. 6. That the owner of subject property shall enter into an agree- ment with the City of Anaheim to perpetually maintain the proposed landscaped medians; with the agreement being a covenant to run with R-3 zoned property. r- Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission for the development of eleven R-3 parcels; and noted that with the extension of Brookmore Street easterly, ani the additional street facilities proposed, each lot within the R-3 subdivision would have frontage on a dedicated street. He indicated that the City Planning Commission felt that medium density was suitable to the area, and that the waivers requested were technical in nature; that the request for minimum number of required parking spaces had been withdrawn since the City Planning Commission hearing, and that all parking now meets Code requirements. There being no opposition to subject reclassification, the Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Jim Huson, 1665 South Brookhurst Street, representing lease holders Robert H. Grant and Ed Wallington, noted that the proposed develop- ment utilized 48.5% coverage, whereas 55% is permitted; that there is a need for deluxe single units, such as these; and that the requested planting strips in the street will be covered by a perpetual maintenance agreement as required. The Mayor declared the hearing closed. I' RESOLUTION NO. 68R-352: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-352 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD B~ AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-86 - Portion No.1, C-l; Portion No.2, R-3.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-352 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-353: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-353 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1979, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the following: That proponent accept the perpetual maintenance of the planters in the streets by some method satisfactory to the City of Anaheim. r , Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1979. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-353 duly passed and adopted. o 68-362 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 5162. REVISION NO.3: Developer - Brookmore, Inc- corporated; tract located on the east side of Brookhurst Street, north of Brookmore Avenue and Ball Road, containing eleven proposed R-3 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held May 20, 1968, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: 'l 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5162, Revision No.3, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-86 and Variance No. 1979. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. ment with the medians; wi th perty. That the owner of subject property shall enter into an agree- City of Anaheim to perpetually maintain the proposed landscaped the agreement being a covenant to run with the R-3 zoned pro- Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5162, Revi- sion No.3, be approved, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL - PLANTERS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the fol~owing Council Policy was adopted: It is the policy of the City Council that permission for the con- struction of planters in the public right-of-way shall be granted adminis- tratively by the Development Services Department subject to the following: 1. Approval of the Director of Public Works as to design, affect on traffic circulation and maintenance requirements. 2. Approval of the Fire Chief as to the affect upon circulation of fire fighting equipment. 3. Approval of the City Attorney as to the establishment of a parkway maintenance assessment district to provide for perpetual maintenance of said planter at the expense of the abutting property owners. l MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-42. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 988 AND VARIANCE NO. 1935: Public hearings held January 30 and April 30, 1968, with decision continued from the meetings of May 14 and June 11, 1968, to this date as a result of tie vote on resolutions to deny; submitted by Dick Ables, Leonard Smith and Frank Clayton, Jr., requesting a change of zone from R-l to C-l and permis- sion to establish a service station within 75 feet of a residential zone, (Portion No. 1 only,) and permission to erect two free-standing signs with waiver of minimum distance permitted between free-standing signs, (Portion Nos. 1 and 2); property located on the east side of Euclid Street, between Cerritos Avenue and Mells Lane. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC68~3, PC68-4, and PC68-5, recommended denial of subject reclassification, condi- tional use permit and variance, Mayor Pebley, refering to the tie vote taken June ll, 1968, at which time he abstained from voting, stated that the architect of the pro- posed development is no longer a leaseholder of his, and requested an opin- ion from the City Attorney as to any possible conflict of interest involved in voting on the matter at this time. 1 Mr. Geisler advised that the possible conflict of interest which previously existed has now been removed, and as reported before, such con- flict of interest did not prohibit his participation, but justified his ab- stention; and since a conflict of interest no longer exists, abstention at the present time would not be justified. 68-363 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. I At the request of Councilman Schutte, Mr. Chan Lefebvre, repre- senting Rinker Development Corporation, address the Council, outlining nine changes in the plans which were hoped to overcome objections from the adjoin- ing property owners. The revised plans were reviewed by the City Council as Mr. Lefebvre outlined the proposed changes, indicated in red on said plans. Councilman Clark called attention to the petition signed by 236 people who opposed the subject development, as well as those who spoke in opposition at the public hearing. He felt that the proposed revision should be considered by the City Council, but that the adjacent resident should be heard to determine how the proposed revisions would affect him and others living nearby. Mr. R.C. Maus, l680 West Cerritos, directly southeast of subject property, addressed the Council, stating that although he had seen the re- vised plans, it was the service station itself to which he and others in the area objected, and the proposed revisions had not changed their thinking. He cited Reclassification No. 67-68-67 and Conditional Use Permit No. lOl9 which the City Council denied earlier in the day, and indicated surrounding circumstances were the same; that this was an expensive residential area, and their privacy should be protected; that if the Council approved this requested use he would like to speak in regard to hours of operation. Councilman Clark observed that most station in that area operate from 6:00 A.M. to Midnight; that 7:00 A.M. to lO:OO P.M. would be the mini- mum span of feasible operation, but he felt there would be no schedule of operation compatible to adjoining residential property owners. Mr. Maus concurred. I' RESOLUTION NO. 68R-354: Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-354 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the following conditions: f1 . r l. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a str.'_p of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Mells Lane, including a 15 foot radius corner return,for street widen- ing purposes. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 25 foot radius corner return for street widening purposes at the intersection of Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Mells Lane, Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Mells Lane, Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 5. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject' property be submotted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be re- corded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 6. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Mells Lane, Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue, as required by the City Engineer, and in accord- ance with standard plans and 8pecifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 7. That the existing driveway depressions, which are not proposed to be used, along Mells Lane, Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue, shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard p=-ans and specifications on file in the of- fice of the City Engineer. 8. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 9. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent resi- dential homes. 10. That all external lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjacent property lines. 68-364 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. 11. That there shall be no access on Mells Lane to the commercial property within 75 feet from the residential area. 12. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of l80 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tt~E CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUlHCIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-42 - C-l.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIUIEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-354 duly passed and adopted. Mr. Lefebvre again addressed the Council, calling attention to the difficulties involved in complying with the conditions for reclassification, due to separate ownership of the thr~e parcels. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-355: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-355 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 988, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 988. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton and Krein None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-355 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-356: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-356 for adoption, denying Variance No. 1935, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 988. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton and Krein None 1 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-356 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSAL - VALEN PARKING MANAGEMENT COMPANY: Request for permit to operate a town tour service, submitted by Valen Parking Management Company, continued from the meeting of June ll, 1968. The City Clerk read two letters received June 24, 1968, from both partners of the Yellow Cab Company, and letter dated June 25, 1968, from Taylor School Bus Service, urging denial of subject request. 68-365 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 19689 1:30 P.M. r The Mayor asked Councilman Clark for his and Mr. Murdoch's recom- mendation regarding the subject proposal; Councilman Clark replied that they had recommended the service, however, the points raised in the corres- pondence read should be investigated, especially regarding charter opera- tions. He felt that nothing should be done that would adversely affect the Anaheim Jitney Systems operation, and invited Mr. Valen to answer the objections raised in the correspondence. Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 5:35 P.M. Mr. Michael Valen, l44 South West Street, addressed the Council in support of his proposal, maintaining that the proposed tour bus operation would not be in competition with the Anaheim Jitney Service because of the need for both services; that the jitney system has only four buses to service the eight million visitors to this area; that the jitney system operates routes to Knott's Berry Farm and the downtown area, which the tour bus does not propose to do; and that the tour bus service proposes what businesses in this area have requested and recommended. In answer to statements made in regard to similar services exist- ing in Los Angeles and St. Louis, Mr. Valen pointed out that the representa- tive of the Minibus Company made the comparison with the Tanner Grey Line operations. Mr. Valen explained the hours of operation which would differ from those of Anaheim Jitney System, and cited names of hotels and entertainment establishments that have requested this service. r I I Council discussion followed, and Councilman Dutton pointed out that the Disneyland area route is the most lucrative, and if the tour bus operates in this area it could diminish the profit which the existing jitney system requires in order to operate the other less profitable routes. Mr. Geisler noted that the type of operation is in the nature of a public utility; that permits are granted on the public utility concept and the person accepting the privilege of limited competition is expected to serve the general public; the City Council may grant all applications and establish specific routes, however, increased competition on the only profitable route places in jeopardy the routes which are not profitable, and noted that the jitney could establish a route similar to that proposed by the tour bus to serve the need if one exists. He further reported that the Visitor and Convention Bureau has ascertained that existing public trans- portation in Anaheim is inadequate for most conventions. Mr. Dennis Menke, attorney for Mr. Valen, requested that the City Council also grant them a temporary permit for six months or one year, on a trial basis, to be reviewed at expiration thereof, to determine whether con- tinuation of the service is desirable. He felt their proposal would comple- ment the existing jitney service, rather than compete. He further felt that such determination should be made by observation rather than by speculation. n I I I I Council discussion followed, regarding the necessity of issuing a permit for the proposed tour bus operation, with Mr. Geisler ruling that the proposal as outlined would require a permit under our ordinance, on the basis that the operation constitutes a service to the public, paid for by the passenger. Mr. Menke concurred with this ruling. Councilman Clark asked Mr. Valen if he would be willing to accept a six-month temporary permit, with the understanding that it may not be ex- tended following the trial period. Mr. Va1en answered in the affirmative. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing Anaheim Jitney Systems, Incorporated, spoke in opposition to granting a temporary permit, and felt the existing transportation systems could take care of the demand as it arose. Additional competition in the Disneyland area would be detrimental, due to the fact that this profitable route supplements the others. He pointed out that the Anaheim Jitney Systems, Yellow Cab Company, Taylor School Bus Service, and Southern California Rapid Transit District were presently in the area, and profits were limited according to present demand. 68-366 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Tom Jaeger, Anaheim Jitney Systems, Incorporated, also spoke in opposition to granting a temporary permit, as the jitney system is able to con- tinue and expand the downtown area and senior citizen routes only through the profit received from the Disneyland area. He requested a study be made on the need and necessity for the service proposed, and indicated the jitney system would provide said service if it is determined a real need exists. In answer to Councilman Clark, Mr. Jaeger indicated he would investigate the demand for a baseball route from Downtown Anaheim to the Stadium. Mr. Howard Beardsley, representing Southern California Rapid Transit District, 1060 South Broadway, Los Angeles, concurred with Mr. Jaeger, and was of the opinion that service in this area was highly competitive, and that an erosion of Rapid Transit District revenues would also result if the City Coun- cil granted the permit requested. Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 6:05 P.M. Mr. Jim Bauers, Manager, Taylor School Bus Service, 10961 Dale Street, Stanton, addressed the Council, pointing out that Mr. Valen did not answer the charge that he would be competing in the charter field. Mr. Valen responded that the Visitor and Convention Bureau indicated a need for additional charter service for conventions; that he did not propose to be in competition with bus service. Mayor Pebley stated that the Council was interested in keeping all the existing jitney routes in operation, and expressed concern over the possi- bility of endangering these routes by granting a permit for the tour bus service. Mr. Menke and Mr. Valen offered to accept a temporary permit on the basis of revocation at the discretion of the City Council. MOTION: Following further Council discussion, Councilman Dutton moved to deny subject request for temporary permit, as determination of need and neces- sity had not been shown. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMITS: The following applications were submitted and granted, sub- ject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recom~ mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. Application submitted by Edward Negrete on behalf of Comite Central DeFestejos del Condado do Orange, for permit to conduct public dance on July l4, 1968, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue. b. Application filed by Carmen D. Sanchez, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana #14, for permit to conduct public dance on July 21, 1968, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held June 3, 1968, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 1988: Submitted by Irving Kingston requesting waivers of maxi- mum area of a free-standing sign and permitted location of a free-standing sign, to enlarge an existing free-standing sign; M-l zoned property, located at 1566 West Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l54, granted said variance, subject to condition. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. l03l: Submitted by Max C. and Pauline Graves, requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant; R-1 zoned property, located at 2004 and 2008 Underhill Avenue. l 1 1 68-367 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l62, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1032: Submitted by Reverend H.A. McPheeters, requesting permission to establish an existing church facility as a conform- ing use, with waivers of minimum building setback and minimum required rear yard; R-A zoned property, located at 1648 West Broadway. I The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l55, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1791: Submitted by Kurt Singer, requesting an extension to Variance No. 1791 as provided by Resolution granting the use of a single- family residential structure as a professional writer's office, for a per- iod of two years; R-l zoned property, located at 3164 West Tyler Avenue. The City Planning Commission granted a one-year extension, to expire May 6, 1969. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 970: Submitted by Walt Disney Productions, re- questing an extension of time to complete conditions. Previously granted to permit the establishment of an II-story hotel-motel complex; R-A zoned property located at the southwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and West Street. The City Planning Commission granted a six-months extension of time, to expire November 6, 1968. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permits and variance applications. I RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-54 AND VARIANCE NO. 1954: Submitted by Clifford C. Bottenfield, requesting a change in zone from R-l to R-2, and permission to construct six 2-story apartment units, with waivers of maximum building height within 150 feet of single-family residences, and required masonry wall; property located at 732 North East Street. (Resolution of Intent to zone R-3 - 67-68-68.) The City Planning Commission recommended termination of subject reclassification, upon request of the applicant. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, all proceedings on Reclassification No. 67-68-54 were terminated, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l5l, granted Variance No. 1954, subject to conditions; no further action was taken by the City Council. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 6647. REVISION NO.1: Developer - Sand S Con- struction Company; tract located on the east side of Rio Vista Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, and contains ll7 proposed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. r l On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Tentative Map, Tract No. 6647, Revision No.1, was continued to be consid- ered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 67-68-98, and Variance No. 1989. MOTION CARRIED. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18. ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held June 3, 1968, terminated all proceedings on considera- tion of an amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.12, Zone Established, Section 18.12.030, Rules for Interpretation, on the basis that the proposed change was not necessary at this time. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Clark, action of the. City Planning Commission was sustained. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-357 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-20: On recommendation of the Development Services Department, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-357 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 64R-l03, to allow individual development of parcels under Reclassification No. 63-64-20. 68-368 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968,. 1: 30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-103 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-20. (R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None l The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-357 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2534: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2534 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-20 - R-3.) RESOLUTION NO. 68R-358 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-21: On recommendation of the Development Services Department, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-358 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 64R-l05, to allow individual development of parcels under Reclassification No. 63-64-21. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-105 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-21. (R-3.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None l The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-358 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2535: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2535 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-21 - R-3.) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nos. 68R-359 to 68R-363, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-359 - WORK ORDER NO. 237: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: REMOVAL OF TREES, TREE STUMPS AND SHRUBS ON WEST STREET AND CON- VENTION WAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 237; AP~ROVING THE DE- SIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THERIDF; AUIHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON- STRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened July 18, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-360 - WORK ORDER NOS. 247. 522A. and 954: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUB- LIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND dOMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF WEST STREET AND CONVENTION WAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NOS. 247,. 522A, and 954; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND A~ORIZING AND DI- RECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened July ll, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) 68-369 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-361 - WORK ORDER NO. 536-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CON- VENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT~ THE IMPROVEMENT OF CRESCENT AVENUE, FROM BROOKHURST STREET TO MAGNOLIA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 536-B. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUB- LISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - July 11, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 68R-362 - WORK ORDER NO. 539-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CON- VENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF DALE AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 539-B, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - July 11, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) r RESOLUTION NO. 68R-363 - WORK ORDER NO. 537-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CON- VENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LINCOLN AVENUE, FROM RIO VISTA STREET TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO.537-B, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZ- ING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PRO- POSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - July ll, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 68R-359 to 68R-363, both in- clusive, duly passed and adopted. CALL FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING: Councilman Dutton moved that the City Clerk be au- thorized to publish notice inviting sealed bids for furnishing legal adver- tising for the City of Anaheim, (bids to be opened July 18, 1968, at 2:00 P.M.) Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Pebley left the Council meeting, 6:20 P.M., and Mayor Pro- Tem Schutte assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. n REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION - NO PARKING ZONE - LINCOLN AVENUE AND SUNKIST STREET: Mr. Francis L. Ricker, 12459 East Lincoln Avenue, addressed the Council, requesting clarification of the "No Parking Ordinancell recently adopted affecting the area in front of his home. He objected to the "No Parking II zone because he felt that original street dedication was for the purpose of establishing parking, the loss of which impaired his residence. He also referred to an application for reclassification, formerly submitted, to establish a service station on his property, which had been denied by , the City Council, and requested it again be considered at this time. The City Attorney advised Mr. Ricker that street dedication is for the movement of traffic and not necessarily for the purpose of provid- ing parking; and when increased traffic warrants, parking is removed by action of the City Council. He further advised that the Council could not reconsider a zoning change without formal application and required public hearings, and suggested he contact the Development Services Department for additional information. 68-370 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1968. 1:30 P.M. PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Councilman Schutte was granted permission to leave the State for thirty days. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - WEB SERVICE COMPANY: Request was submitted by Mr. W.E. Bloomfield, of Web Service Company, to discuss a possible change in the Anaheim City Ordinance pertaining to the licensing of coin-operated laundry equipment. On recommendation of Mr. Davis, and with the consent of Mr. Bloom- field, consideration of subject request was continued pending completion of a survey by the City Manager's office. n ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn to June 28, 1968, 2:00 P.M., and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 6:40 P.M. SIGNED L),r, ~.: ,...-/ r City Clerk n City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1968, 2:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: Schutte ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. n PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - AWARD OF CONTRACTS: In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 68R-364 to 68R-367, both inclusive, for adoption as follows: