Minutes-ZA 1998/10/08ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8,1998 9:30 A.M.
--
STAFF PRESENT:
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator
Dave See, Associate Planner
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney
Gladys Wason,
1a. CEQA EXEMPTION SECTION 115061(bl(31} APPROVED
1b. ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 146 APPROVED
OWNER: ILija and Lucija Jukic
388 S. Country Hill Rd.
Anaheim, CA 92808
LOCATION: 388 S. Country Hill Road. Property is approximately 0.87 acre having a
frontage of 220 feet on the east side of Country Hill Road, a maximum
depth of 321 feet and located approximately 310 feet west of the
centerline of Old Ranch Road.
Waiver of maximum height offences/walls (a 3-foot high wall permitted in the front yard
setback; a 6-foot high wall proposed) to retain an existing six (6) foot high concrete black
wall located in the front yard setback within 4 to 6 feet of Country Hill Road (Code
requires a 25-foot setback fora 6-foot high wall located adjacent to Country Hill Road).
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION NO.98-27
Appeal period ends October 7, 1998 at 5:00 p.m.
REMARKS: The Zoning Administrator approved Administrative Adjustment No. 146
.PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION APPROVED
2b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.4063 APPROVED
OWNER: Joe Wassilian
601 Michael Collins
Montebello, CA 90640
ZA100898.DOC
to/oa/9s ~~~ /
AGENT: Christopher Sarkissian
517 S. State College Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 512 South State College Boulevard. Property is
approximately 0.34 acre having a frontage of 144 feet on
the east side of State College Blvd., located
approximately 168 feet south of the centerline of Westport
Drive.
To permit the sales of beer and wine for on-premises consumption in
conjunction with an existing 2,235 square foot enclosed restaurant.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION NO. 96_28
9:40 A.M.
The applicant not being present, and staff having attempted to reach the applicant by phone
and being unable to do so, the Zoning Administrator continued this request to the next
meeting of October 23, 1998 and adjourned the meeting.
9:47 A.M.
The applicant entered the Council Chambers and the Zoning Administrator re-convened the
meeting, recinded the continuance, and re-opened the public hearing.
Christopher Sarkissian, took time and reviewed conditions of the staff report at the
Administrative hearing and was satisfied with the conditions.
The Zoning Administrator approved Conditional Use Pennit No. 4063 subject to the
conditions as recommended by staff with acceptions of
A one year limitation for conditional use permit at a new location..
Standard conditions typically use the phrase alcoholic beverages, and this is a beer and
wine specifically and if approved the wording alcohol and beverages will be changed.
Condition No. 5 references that there shall be no more than 40 seats both in and out of
doors to insert the word "at these premises".
Insert a new condition no. 23 indicating that they shall obtain an Alcbholic Beverage Control
License for beer and wine. That condition no. 20 is modified to read that condition 16, 17,
18, 19 and 23 shall be met prior to commencing the operation that has been approved.
This proposal is for beer and wine for on premises consumption in connection with the
service of meals at all times and it is just a table set up.
In connection with a permit like this, if the City approves it, the applicant must obtain a
license from the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board which may or may not
approve it, so the approval made at this hearing would not be the final decision.
The Zoning Administrator requested that a copy of the decision and staff report be sent to
the school district.
The Sarkissian's sent a letter (attached to the staff report) to the school district regarding
previous concerns that the school district had but neither the Sarkissian Family or the City
received acknowledgment or response.
t oiosi9a ~~"GE
A palm tree was cut and the Zoning Administrator requested a replacement with trees and
the applicant agreed.
PLANNER: Dave See, stated that we did not receive a letter from the school district similar
to the one we received last year for a similar case.
No one indicating their interest in speaking.
3, ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: NONE
10/08/98 ~~~~LC-