Resolution-PC 2004-6~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-6
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04817 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for
Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as:
PARCEL 1: THE NORTH 15 ACRES OF THE EAST 33.10 ACRES OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE
SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2: THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SANTA ANA BRANCH OF THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, WHICH EXTENDS SOUTHERLY ACROSS SAID
WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 OF A DEED TO THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 20, 1961 IN BOOK 5854 PAGE 457, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on January 12, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03
(Zoning Procedures-Amendments, Conditional Use Permits and Variances), to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.03.030 and 18.61.050.360 to wit: to permit an indoor
sports complex in an existing industrial building.
2. That, as conditioned herein, the proposed sports center will not adversely affect the
surrounding land uses or the growth and development of the area.
3. That the size and shape of the property is adequate to allow full development of the
sports center in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare.
Cr\PC2004-006 -1- PC2004-6
• ~
4. That a Traffic Impact and Parking Study, prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan
Engineers and dated December 30, 2003, indicates that on-site parking spaces will be adequate to serve
the sports center; and that the Study was reviewed and approved by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager.
5. That granting this conditional use permit for an indoor sports center will not, under
the conditions imposed, be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of
the City of Anaheim.
6. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the
proposal, and no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit an indoor sports complex in an existing
industrial building on an irregularly-shaped 18.6-acre property located at the southeast corner of Cerritos
Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard with frontages of 1,260 feet on the south side of Cerritos Avenue and
530 feet on the east side of Anaheim Boulevard, and being further described as 1500 South Anaheim
Boulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects
the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of
the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have
a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
That the hours of operation shall be limited to the following:
Activities other than tournaments & special events: Monday through Friday: 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Tournaments and special events: Saturday and Sunday: 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Any request to allow tournaments and special events on days other than Saturday and Sunday, shall
be accompanied by an updated parking and traffic study submitted to the Traffic and Transportation
Manager for review. The applicant's request and the Traffic and Transportation Manager's
recommendation shall then be considered by the Planning Commission as a`Reports and
Recommendations' item.
2. That no public telephones which are located outside the building shall be permitted on subject
property.
3. That plans shall be submitted to the Building Division demonstrating compliance with all Building and
Fire Code requirements pertaining to the change in occupancy.
4. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the underlying ML(SABC) (Limited
Industrial -South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor Overlay) Zone unless a variance allowing sign
waivers is approved by the Planning Commission. Any new signs shall be submitted to the Zoning
Division for review and approval. The decision of the Zoning Division relating to new signs may be
appealed to the Planning Commission as a'Reports and Recommendations' item.
5. That the developer shall submit evidence to the Public Works Department, Development Services
Division, that the site is a legal parcel of record as defined by the Subdivision Map Act. If the site is
not a legal parcel, the developer shall submit a Certificate of Compliance for review and approval by
the City Engineer.
-2- PC2004-6
. •
Proposed Condition No. 6 was intentionally deleted at the January 12, 2004 public hearing.
7. That the property owner shall implement appropriate non-structural and structural Best Management
Practices ("BMPs") as specified in the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan ("DAMP"),
Appendix G. The selected BMPs shall be implemented and maintained to minimize the introduction
of pollutants from entering the City of Anaheim storm water drainage system.
8. That all requests for new water services or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations or
abandonment of existing water services and fire lines, shall be coordinated through the Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
9. That all existing water services shall conform to current Water Utility Standards. Any existing water
services that are not approved by the Utility for continued use shall be upgraded to current standards
or abandoned by the property owner/developer. Any existing service that is no longer needed shall
be abandoned by the property owner/developer.
10. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval
showing conformance with the current versions of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436, 601/602
pertaining to parking standards and driveway locations. Subject property shall thereupon be
developed and maintained in conformance with said approved plans.
11. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage.
12. That bicycle racks shall be provided adjacent to this sports center facility.
13. That a"Traffic and Parking Management Plan" for tournaments and other special events shall be
submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval. Said plans shall
specify the number of parking attendants needed to direct traffic during tournaments and other
events, including the number of parking attendants needed to direct overflow traffic to the roof top
parking lot located at 500 East Cerritos Avenue and accessed from the south via Claudina Avenue
and Anaheim Way.
14. That, if required, the legal property owner shall dedicate to the City of Anaheim an easement along
the property line (dimensions will vary) for public utility purposes.
15. That any required relocation of City electrical utilities shall be at the expense of the property
owner/developer. Landscape and/or hardscape screening of all pad-mounted equipment shall be
required and shall be outside the easement area of the equipment. Said information shall be
specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
16. That three (3) foot high street address numbers shall be displayed and maintained on the roof of the
building in contrasting colors to the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible to the adjacent
streets or properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted to the Police
Department, Community Services Division, for review and approval.
17. That the property owner shall submit a letter to the Zoning Division requesting termination of
Variance No. 3148 (waiver of maximum fence height to construct a 15-foot high fence) and Variance
No. 1961 (waiver of minimum required landscaped setback to permit a private parking lot).
18. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and as conditioned herein.
-3- PC2004-6
~ ~
19. That prior to issuance of a building permit or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 3, 5, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16 and 17, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
20. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 12, 13 and 18, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with.
21. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval
of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
22. That within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of this resolution, authorization for Conditional
Use Permit which is satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office shall be submitted to the Zoning
Division and the City Attorney's Office.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof,
be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted t the Planning Commission meeting of
January 12, 2004.
~vrn.P~- ~l~n-vteJ-c~~~ ^~ c,~ru,UtQ-~
HAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTES~:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pat Chandler, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on January 12, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BUFFA, EASTMAN, FLORES, O'CONNELL, ROMERO,
VANDERBILT-LINARES
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~day of
, 2004.
^ ~
~ ~~~~~~~~
IOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC2004-6