Loading...
ZA 1987-17PETITION NO.: DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - ZA 87-17 VARIANCE N0. 3693 EIR STATUS: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 27 , 1987 OPPOSITION: No. of people attending public hearing 0; Correspondence 0 OWNERS: JAMES D. BAKER 111 AND JON MARIE BAKER, 563 Paseo Ganado, Anaheim,. CA 92807 LOCATION: 563 Paseo Ganado REQUEST: Waiver of maximum building height to construct a 38-f oot high, tri-level, single-f amity residence. Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Director of Community Development, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.060, to decide the above-referenced petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed - for and held on the date set forth above, I do hereby find,..: that: 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as .size, shape, topography with a very `steep slope, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; and 2. .That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in identical zoning classification in the vicinity. 3. That the height of the tri-level dwelling follows; the steep slope on which it will be constructed and is not as high as it appears to be because of the unusual nature of the property with`approximately 2/3 being under a Southern California Edison easement. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the proposal and the Initial Study and finds no significant environmental impact and, therefore, recommends that a Negative Declaration be approved upon a finding by the .Planning Commission that zt has considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Variance No. 3693, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate major thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be paid to the City 'of Anaheim in an amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge:Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as approved by City Council Resolution No. 85R-423. 2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council. 0042T i • Page 2 Variance No. 3693 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council. 4. That przor to issuance of a building permit, the owner of subject property shall pay the appropriate drainage assessment fees to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Engineer. 5. That prior to issuance of a building permit the appropriate fees due for primary, secondary and fire protection shall be paid to the Water Utility Division by the owner/developer in accordance with Rules 15A and 20 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules and Regulations. 6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 8. That przor to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9. That any specimen tree removal shall be subject to the tree preservation regulations in Chapter'18.84 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the "SC" Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. 10. That, as specified in Anaheim Municipal Code Section No. 18.84.041.012, no roof-mounted equipment, whatsoever, shall be permitted. 11. That subject .property. shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and spec ifacations on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 12. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one year from the date of this decision, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4; and 5, above-mentioned, shall be comp.zed with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 13. That prior to final building and zoning inspections ,..Condition Nos. 6, 7, and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. 14. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable C zty regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request x egarding any other applicable ordinance, requlatzon or requirement. 2 ZA 87-17 0042T • • Page 3 Variance No. 3693 This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 2nd day of September., .1987. Annika M. Santalahti Zoning Administrator NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied. by an appeal fee, is filed with the City ..Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless a member of the City Council shall request to review thisdecision within said 15 days. DECLARATION OF_SERVICE BY MAIL:. i do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the US Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk. DATED: ~ !q i( ~~Q 3 ZA 87-17 0042T