Resolution-ZA 1988-72~ ~,
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR --ZA 88-72
PETITION: VABIANCB NO. 3876 CEQA STATUS: Negative Declaration
DATE OF PUBLIC .HEARING: December 1, 1988
OPPOSITIONS No one indicated their presence in opposition and no
correspondence was received.
OWNER: THOMAS A. CONTI AND KIM E. CONTI
..1245 North Big Spring.Street, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 1245 North Big Spring Street
REQUE5Tr Petitioner proposes waiver of the following to construct a
290-square foot room addition to. an existing single family
residence:
SECTIONS 18.12.060.07.0 - Maximum lot coveraae.
and 18.27.062.020 (35~ permitted, 39~;proposed)
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant
to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18:12.D40, to` decide-the above-referenced
petition and a 'public hearing having been duly noticed #orand held on the
date set forth above, I do hereby find:
1. That the request is minimal because other useable open recreation space
(to replace the back yard area covered by -the proposal) is available
elsewhere: in the front yard (about half of which-is 20 feet deeper than
the minimum required by Code) and in one:side'yard (which is 5 feet wider
than the minimum required by Code);
2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as
size, shape, .topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to
.other identically zoned properties in the vicinity;. and
3. That strict application. of the Zoning .Code deprives the. property of
_privileges enjoyed by other properties 'in identical zoning classification
in the vicinity..
..CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That- the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to waive maximum .lot ..coverage to construct a
290-square foot room' addition,: to an existing single-family .residence on a
'rectangularly-shaped .parcel of land consisting of. approximately 0.1 acre,
having a frontage of ;approximately 50 feet on the west= side of Big Spring
Street, :.having a maximum depth of approximately 100 feet, being located
approximately .340 feet north of, the center line of Woodsboro Avenue and
further ''described as 1245 North` Big Spring Street; and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration upon finding that she has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
0161g 1 ZA 88-72
Page 2
Variance. No. 3876
Based on the-evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approve Variance No. 3876, subject to the following conditions:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos.. 1, 2 and 3.
2. That approval` of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City regulations. Approval does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
This decision is made,. signed,. and entered.. into the file this eighth day of
December, 1988.
.. Div/-
Annika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final -unless an appeal to the .City
Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City
Clerk within 15 'days of the date of the signing of this `decision or unless
members°of the City Council shall ,request to review this:. decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby.declare-under penalty of perjury
that on the .date set. forth ..below, I did deposit, in the :United States Mail, a
copy of the decision `to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED: December 8, 1988 ,~G~L~C~ ~'
Pamela H. .Starnes, Executive ;Secretary
0161g 2 ZA 88-72