Resolution-ZA 1990-40P~ • ,
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - ZA 90-40
PETITION: CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT N0. 3291
CEQA'STATUS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIQN, CLASS 1
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. June 28, 1990
OPPOSITION: There was no one indicating their presence in opposition and no
correspondence was received.
OWNER:: F.J. HANSHAW ENTERPRISES INC.
10921 Westminster Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92643
AGENT: RHODA B. OSTOWARI
6263 East Twin Peak Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATIONt 1132 North Brookhurst Street
REQUEST: Petitioner requests approval of a conditional use under
authority of Code Sections 18.12.050.010 and 18.44.050.OI0 to
permit expansion of an existing restaurant with on-sale beer and
wine and with waiver of the following:
SECTIONS 18.06.050.0212 - Minimum number of parking spaces.
18.06.050.022 (66 required: fZ0 proposed)
18.06.050.0231
18.06.080
18.12.060.110
and 18.44.066.050
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director to decide
the above-referenced petition, pursuant to. Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.12.-020, and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the
date set forth above, I do hereby find, pursuant to the Sections 18.02.030.030
through 18.02.030.035 of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit
is authorized by the Zoning Code;
2. That a parking study dated May 29, 1990, was submitted and approved by
the City Traffic Engineer for the: specific combination of office,. retail
and restaurant uses at subject property;
3: That the parking waiver will not cause an increase in;traffic congestion
in the immediate vicinity .nor adversely affect any adjoining land uses;
4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect .the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which is is proposed to be
located;
0511g -1- ZA90-40
-
•
Conditional Use Permit No. 3291
Page.2
$. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and
generalwelfare;
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and
7. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be .detrimental to .the peach, health, safety and
general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to permit expansion of an existing restaurant with
on-sale. beer and wine and with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces; and
.that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has .determined
than.. the proposed project falls within the -definition of Categorical
.Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approved"Conditional Use Permit No. 3291, subject to the following conditions:
1. * That trash storage areas shall be provided and?maintained in a location
acceptable to the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division .and in
accordance with approved plans. on file with said division. .Such
information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for
bui ding permits.
2.- That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and .specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner and which plans are `on file. with the Planning Department
marked Exhibit. Nos. 1 and 2.
3. That prior to final building and zoning inspections or within a period of
.one. (1) year from the date of .this decision, whichever occurs first,
.Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
4. * That approval of this application constitutes: approval of the proposed
request only to the eutent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any: other applicable.' City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable
.ordinance, regulation or requirement: Condi ions marked with an asterisk
*) are required by .established laws, codes, regulations and agreements
and are, therefore, not subject to negotiation.
This decision is -made, .signed,. .and entered into .the file this fifth day of
July, 2990.
nika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
05118 -2- ZA 90-40
M • • •
Conditional Use Permit No. 3291
Page 3
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City
Council,. in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City
Clerk within 15 days of the date. of the signing of this decision or unless
members of the"City Council shall request to review this decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth. below,. I did deposit, in the .United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED: .July 5, 1990 / ~C~
Margari Perez, Acting Se etary
05118 -3- ZA 90-40