Resolution-ZA 1991-25~,
C7
•
DECISION OF ~ ZONING A~JIS•I'RA'POR NO. ZA 91-25
PETITION: ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 60
CEQA STATUS: Categorical Exemption, Class 11
DATE NOTICES MAILED: May 17, 1991
REQUESTED BY: Jeff Warmoth
The Baldwin Company
16811 Hale Avenue, Irvine CA 92714
LOCATION: 8125 East Oxley Court
REQUEST: Waiver of the Following to retain an existing single-family residence
under authority of Section 18.12.080.010:
Sections 18.24.063.020
and 18.72.020 -.100 of
the. Anaheim Municipal
Code and
Section 18.72.070.010 of
Chapter IV of Specific
Plan No. 88-2
Minimum side vard setback.
(Required: minimum 6 feet with a
combined side yard total of 15 feet for a
2-story dwelling in Development. Area No.
101 of The Summit Specific Plan;
Existing: 5.5 feet with a combined side
yard total of 13 feet)
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director to decide
the above-referenced Administrative Adjustment, and subject petition having
been duly noticed and no written objections having been received, I do hereby
find, pursuant to Section .18.12.080:
1. That the proposed deviations from the Code standards are 8.3~ for the
minimum side yard and 13.3 for the minimum combined side yards, which
percentages are less than the maximum 20~ permitted in connection with an
administrative adjustment;
2. That subject side yard abuts the rear yard setbacks of adjacent dwellings
which are located more than 90 feet from subject dwelling, and that said
adjacent rear yards contain a slope; and
3. That no written opposition was received during the required notification
period.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALZTY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to retain an existing single-family residence with
waiver of minimum side yard setback; and that the Planning Director or his
authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within
the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the State EIR
Guidelines ,and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to
prepare an EIR.
AADJ-60
1
ZA 91-25
Administrative Adjustment No. 60
Page 2
Based on the evidence presented to me, I do hereby determine to grant
Administrative Adjustment No. 60 subject to the following condition:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
.petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked
Exhibit No. 1.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this sixth day of
June, 1990.
Annika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City
Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City
Clerk within 25 davs of the date of the signing of this decision or unless
members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty. of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City
Clerk.
DATED.: June 6, 1991 ~/.~'~~`.%~-t/~C~ fU"
Pamela H. Starnes
Administrative Assistant
AADJ-60
2
ZA 91-25