Resolution-ZA 1991-31r ~"
DECISION OF THE ZONING-ADMINISTRATOR NO. ZA 91-31
AMENDING DECISION NO. ZA 90-31
PETITION: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3276
CEQA STATUS: Negative Declaration (previously approved)
HEARING DATE: July 25, 1991
OPPOSITION: One concerned person spoke at the public hearing; and one
letter was received opposing any additional children at the
child care facility.
PETITIONER: Hwa Ja Rah
Calvary Day Care School
2207 West Woodley Avenue Anaheim CA 92801
LOCATION: 2207 and 2211 West Woodley Avenue
REQUEST: The petitioner requests amendment to the conditions of approval
pertaining to time limitations.
Having-been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director to decide
the above-referenced petition, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.12.020, and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the
date set forth above, I do hereby find, pursuant to the'Sections 18.02.030.030
through 18.02.030.035 of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
1. That Decision No. ZA 90-31, approving a child day care facility for 30
children, was signed by the Zoning Administrator on June 21, 1990 and
included Condition No. 12, as follows:
"That subject conditional use permit is approved for a period of
I year; provided, however, that additional periods of time may be
sought upon written ,request by the petitioner in connection with a
duly-noticed public hearing. Approval of such extension will include
consideration as to whether this use has had an adverse impact on the
surrounding neighborhood (for instance: are children being
dropped-off and picked-up from vehicles stopped or parked on the Zot
at 2211 West Woodley Avenue, as required; are such vehicles being
backed onto Woodley Avenue or are such vehicles stopping in Woodley
Avenue, thereby adversely impacting passing street traffic; etc.)."
2. That the petitioner, in a letter dated June'18, 1991, requested a time
extension and that a public hearing was scheduled and duly held to
consider amending the conditions of approval pertaining to time
limitations;
3. That testimony given at the public hearing concerned fencing between
subject property and the adjacent property to the west, which fencing does
not provide an adequate view-screen between the day care center and the
adjacent residence;
ZA-3276 -1- ZA 91-31
• •
Conditional Use Permit No. 3276
Page 2
4. That based on the testimony given during the public hearing, a new
condition is being added to Decision No. ZA 90-31 to raise the height of
the existing block wall along the west property line to provide a visual
screen between subject property and the adjacent single family residence;
5. That subject use, as amended, will not adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which is proposed to be
located; and
6. .That subject .use, as amended and under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental. to the peach, health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to amend the conditions of approval pertaining to
time limitations; and does hereby determine that said request is in conformance
with-the previous Negative Declaration determination made in conjunction with
the original approval of subject conditional use permit; and that no further
action regarding said Negative Declaration is necessary.
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
delete .existing. Condit ion No. 12 of Decision No: ZA 90-31, in its entirety, and
to replace it .with the following new condition:
12. That within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of this decision,
the height of the existing block wall along the west. property line of
subject property shall be raised to least six (6) feet but no more than
seven (7) feet (as measured from the highest adjacent grade level) to
screen the view between subject property and the adjacent single-family
residence to the west. The height of the block wall may be raised by wood
or plastic screening material. The fence, height shall not be raised in
the front yard. Evidence shall be submitted to the Zoning Division
showing that: (a) the neighbor to the west has concurred with the height,
design and material of the screen fencing and (bj that the screen fencing
has been installed.
This decision is made, signed, and entered. into the file this first day of
August, 1991.
Annika M. Santalahti,
Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council,
in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within
15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless members of the
City Council shall request to review this decision within said 15 days.
ZA-3276 -2- ZA 91-31
~ •
Conditional Use Permit No. 3276
Page 3
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED: August 1, 1991 ~~ ~-Y~
Pamela H. Starnes,
Administrative Assistant
ZA-3276 -3- ZA 91-31