Resolution-ZA 1991-47
• •
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - ZA 91-47
PETITION: VARIANCE NO. 4154 CEQA STATUS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CLASS 5
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 14, 1991
OWNER: JAY O. LEE AND CLARA Y. LEE
306 North State College Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 29806
LOCATION: 306 North State Collette Boulevard
OPPOSITION:. No one indicated their presence in at the public hearing in
opposition and no correspondence in opposition was received.
REQUEST: Petitioner requests waiver of the following under authority of code
Section 18.12.060.110 to construct a 929 sq.ft. office addition:
SECTIONS 18.06.050.0212 - Minimum number of parking spaces.
18.06.080 (8 required; 7 proposed}
and 18.44.066.050
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant
to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced
petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the date
set forth above, I do hereby find:
1. That the City Traffic Engineering staff has concurred with the parking
demand analysis prepared for this specific proposal, a deviation of only 1
parking space (12'~~) less than the 8 spaces (100) required by Code;
2. That the parking variance will not cause an increase in traffic congestion
in the immediate vicinity nor adversely affect any adjoining land uses; and
3. That the granting of the parking variance under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety or general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal for waiver of minimum number of parking spaces to
construct a 927 sq.ft. office addition on a rectangularly shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 0.14 acre, having a frontage of approximately 61
feet on the east side of State College Boulevard, with a maximum depth of
approximately 97 feet, being located approximately 1,310 feet south of the
centerline of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 306 North State College
Boulevard and that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has
determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical
Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
ZA-4154 -1- ZA 91-47
. • ~
Page 2
Variance No. 4154
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approve Variance No. 4154, subject to the following conditions:
1. * That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
.signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as established by City Council Resolution.
2. * That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager for his review and approval showing conformance with the latest
revision of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436 and 602 pertaining to
parking standards and driveway locations.. Subject property shall
thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans.
3. That existing landscaping shall be refurbished and maintained.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
marked Exhibit No. 1.
5. That prior to issuance of a building permit or within a period of one (1)
year from the date of this decision, whichever occurs first, Condition
Nos. 1 and 2 above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for
further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
6. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 3 and
4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
7. * That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
..request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations.
Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval
of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement. Conditions marked with an asterisk (*) are required by
established laws, codes, regulations and agreements and are, therefore, not
subject to negotiation.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this twenty-first day
of November, 1991.
nnika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
ZA-4154 -2- ZA 91-47
• •
Page 3
Variance No. 4154
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City
Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City
Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless
members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City
Clerk.
DATED: November 21, 1991
a~
Pamela H. Starnes
Administrative Assistant
ZA-4154 -3- ZA 91-47