Resolution-ZA 1993-17
•
DECISION NO. ZA 93-17
A DECISION OF THE .ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 4219
OWNER: MICHAEL LANGFORD
1255 North Piedmont Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 1255 North Piedmont Drive
CEQA STATUS: Categorical Exemption, Class 5
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: February 18, 1993
OPPOSITION: No one indicated their presence at the public heazing in opposition to the proposal, and
no correspondence in opposition was received.
REQUEST: Petitioner requests waiver of the following under authority of Code Section
18.12.060.070 to construct a 245 sq.ft. family room addition:
Section 18.27.062.030 - Maximum lot coverage.
5 o permitted [1,750 sq. ft.];
proposed [1,945 sq. ft.])
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced petition and public heazing having been duly
noticed for and held on the date set forth above, I do hereby find:
1. That the requested waiver is minimal, consisting of a room addition which is only 195 feet (4%)
lazger than permitted by Code, and that this proposal could have been processed as an
administrative adjustment which permits a maximum 109b waiver without a public heazing.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator has
reviewed the proposal for waiver of maximum lot coverage to construct a 245 sq.ft. family room
addition on a rectangularly shaped pazcel of land consisting of approximately 0.11 acre, having a
frontage of approximately 50 feet on the west side of Piedmont Drive, having a maximum depth of
approximately 100 feet, located approximately 170 feet south of the centerline of Northfield Avenue, .and
further identified as 1255 North Piedmont; and that the Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical
Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the State of California Environmental Impact Report (EIlt) Guidelines
and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Vaziance No.
4219, subject to the following conditions:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
za4219.wp - 1 - za 93-17
J '
•
•
2. That. prior to issuance of a building permit or within a period of one (1) year from the date of
this decision, .whichever occurs first, Condition No. 1 above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with
Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent
that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State
and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or
approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this twenty-fifth day of February, 1993.
L, r
' a M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing,
accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of
this decision or unless members of the City. Council shall request to review this decision within said 15
days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the
date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and
did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATE: February 25, 1993
Pamela H. Starnes
Administrative Assistant
za4219.wp - 2 - za 93-17