Resolution-ZA 1993-62~~ _
DECISION NO. ZA 93-62
REQUESTED BY:
CEQA STATUS:
A DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 87
Rod O'Connor
28979 Big Ranch
Canyon Lake, CA 92587
Categorical Exemption, Class 5
DATE NOTICES MAILED: December 10, 1993
REQUEST: Waiver of the following to construct asingle-family dwelling on property located at
6405 Via Arboles:
Sections 18.12.080.020 - Maximum lot coveraae.
and 18.27.062.030 35% permitted; 38% proposed)
DETERMINATION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director to decide the above-referenced
Administrative Adjustment, and having been duly noticed and no written objections having been received,
I do hereby find, pursuant to Section 18.12.080:
That subject waiver, consisting of a 9.3% deviation from the maximum permitted lot coverage in the
RS-5000 "Residential, Single. Family" Zone (2,714, sq.ft. permitted and 2,967 sq.ft. proposed),
complies with the maximum 10% deviation permitted in connection with an administrative
adjustment; and
2. That no written opposition was received during the required 10-day notification period.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Zoning Administrator has reviewed the
proposal for waiver of maximum lot coverage on arectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
..,approximately 0.19 acre having a frontage of approximately 63 feet on the north side of Via Arboles, having
a maximum depth of approximately 130 feet, being located approximately 150 feet east of the centerline of
Ramsgate Drive; and that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the
proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions,. Class 5, as defined in the State of
California Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to prepare an EIR.
Based on the evidence presented to me, I do hereby determine to grant Administrative Adjustment No. 87,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. i through 6.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
decision, whichever occurs first, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with .Section
18.03.090 of the Anaheim. Municipal Code.
adj0087.wp - 1 of 2 - ZA 93-62
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning_Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval
of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 30th day of December, 1993.
,`
ni a M, antalahti, oning A ministrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become fina{ unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied by
an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless
members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said 15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set
forth below, I did deposit, in the United State Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward
a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED: December 30, 1993 ~ ~`-
Betty Prest , Sr. Office Specialist~~~
adj0087.wp - 1 of 2 - ZA 93-62