1968/07/09
68-384
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Ii
I
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1980: Submitted by Fredricks Development Corpora-
tion, requesting a waiver of maximum height of a free-standing sign to re-
place an existing 25 ft. sign with a 42 ft. sign; C-1 zoned property, located
north and east of the service station location at the northeast corner of
State College Boulevard and La Palma Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l6l,
denied said variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by Heath and Company, and public hearing scheduled this date.
Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, noted the location of subject
property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed
the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
Plans and files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Pebley
asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Larry Souza, 1113 West Struck Avenue, Orange, asked that the
variance be granted in that the surrounding landscaping impaired view of
the present sign; that east-bound and west-bound traffic on La Palma Avenue
could not view the existing sign; and that future development in the imme-
diate vicinity would further impair visibility of the existing sign. He
displayed a rendering of the proposed sign, and stated that granting the
variance would bring in an estimated $150.00 per day additional business.
--,
In answer to Council questions, Mr. Souza replied that he felt
t~e proposed sign would not be visible from the Riverside Freeway, and the
variance was requested for exposure to La Palma Avenue.
Mr. Souza further reported that a restaurant nearby which was lo-
cated across the street from the freeway and faced a residential area had
a sign much higher than the one he proposed. He also felt that the proposed
sign was not excessively large in size, and pointed out that no fascia signs
are on the building. In conclusion, Mr. Souza called attention to McDonalds
and Jack-In-The-Box drive-in restaurants, which do not adhere to the sign
ordinance as the buildings themselves were signs.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak
in opposition.
Mrs. Dorothy Brennan, 2104 West Judith Lane, Anaheim, expressed
opposition to granting the proposed variance.
There being no further evidence submitted, Mayor Pebley declared
the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-388: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-388
for adoption, denying Variance No. 1980.
n
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO . 1980 .
68-385
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
n
I I
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-388 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-88 AND VARIANCE NO. 1985: Submitted
by Hillman, et a1, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-1 and waiver
of maximum building height within 150 feet of single-family residential
zone boundary, property located adjacent to the southwest corner of Ball
Road and Magnolia Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l52,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
rr
f
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street,
along Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue, for street widening purposes.
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en-
gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road and Magnolia
Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as re-
quired by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering require-
ments.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue
for street lighting purposes.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue
for tree planting purposes.
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be
complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such
further time as the City Council may grant.
6. That any proposed air-conditioning facilities and/or refrigera-
tion equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be
buffered from the adjacent residential homes to the south.
7. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away
from the abutting parcels.
8. That Condition Nos. 6 and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission granted said variance pursuant to
Resolution No. PC68-l53, subject to the following conditions:
;l
, \
I
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 67-68-88.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter-
mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
4. That any air-conditioning facilities or refrigeration equip-
ment shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered
from the adjacent residential homes to the south.
5. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and
away from the abutting parcels.
6. That Condition Nos, 2,3,4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. land 2; provided, however, that treewells shall be
provided at 20-foot intervals and screened landscaping installed along the
west and south property line, as stipulated by the petitioner.
68-386
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to
and considered by the City Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present, and if he concurred
with the City Planning Commission recommendations; the applicant answered
in the affirmative. Mayor Pebley then called for opposition.
Mrs. Dorothy Brennan, 2104 West Judith Lane, Anaheim, spoke in op-
position to subject applications, as she felt an additional supermarket in
that location was unnecessary, as there was one presently located across the
street.
n
. I
J
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-389: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-389
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-
88 - C-l.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
-,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-389 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-390: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-390
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1985, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1985.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-390 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-89: Initiated by the City Planning
Commission, proposing a change in zone from P-L to M-l, the SO foot strip
of property fronting on the south side of Vermont Avenue, extending westerly
from the west side of East Street, to the east side of the Southern Pacific
Railroad (Olive Street). The Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No.
PC68-l63, recommended said reclassification be arypro,:yod. unconditionally.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to
and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to the
City-wide .study undertaken by the City Planning Commission as a result of
site development standards which make P-L zones no longer necessary; result-
ing in all P-L zoned property in the City being rezoned with the exception
of subject property, which was excluded pending determination of possible
upgrading of classification of Vermont Avenue to an arterial highway. Upon
n
!
68-387
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
determination to retain the present classification of Vermont Avenue, the
City Planning Commission initiated subject reclassification to allow de-
velopment with setbacks comparable to those existing in the area.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
n
I '
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-391: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No~ 68R-391
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(67-68-89 - M-l.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-39l duly passed and adopted.
r
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-90 AND VARIANCE NO. 1986: Submitted
by George Agajanian, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3 and a wai-
ver of maximum building height, minimum building site area per dwelling
unit, and minimum distance between buildings, to permit a two-story, 25-
unit apartment complex, property located at the southwest corner of Sumac
Lane and Humor Driven
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-
159, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Humor Drive and Sumac Lane for
tree-planting purposes, and shall be complied with within a period of 180
days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recrea-
tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l60,
granted said variance in part, approving only the waiver of maximum build-
ing and structural height limitations, subject to the following conditions:
r-!
I
I
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re-
classification No. 67-68-90.
2. That the trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance
with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works,
and shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
3. That sub j ec t property shall be developed in accordance wi-th the
Site Development Standards of the R-3 Zone.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted the requested
waivers of minimum building site area per dwelling unit and minimum distance
between buildings would allow the proposed development to exceed the recom-
mended density. Further, waiver of height limitation was approved as it was
felt the adjacent R-A property would develop other than R-l.
Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant was present; there being no
response, called for opposition; there being none, declared the hearing closed.
68-388
Citv Ha11~ Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9~ 1968~ 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-392: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-392
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGEDe
(67-68-90 - R-3.)
n
j
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NO ES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCILMEN: Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-392 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-393: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-393
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1986 in part, as recommended by the
City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NOe 1986.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
.....,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-393 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-91: Submitted by William Development Corporation,
requesting a change in zone from R-2 to R-2, 5,000, property located on the
west side of Lewis Street, between Orangewood Avenue and Simmons Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-
158, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the condition
that a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council
and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission, noting that R-2 zoning
had been previously approved, but never developed, (63-64-61), and that
the proposed single-family development was felt by the City Planning Commis-
sion to be an excellent use.
Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to speak; the applicant
indicated his presence and agreement with the City Planning Commission recom-
mendations. The Mayor then called for opposition; there being no response,
declared the hearing closed.
!""l
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-394: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-394
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(67-68-91 - R-2, 5,000).
II
r-
r-.
68-389
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-394 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 5123: Developer - Westport Development Enterprises,
Inc.; tract located at the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and Lewis
Street, containing 48 proposed R-2, 5,000 zone lots. (67-68-91.)
The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held June 3, 1968,
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5123 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-91.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings to Lewis Street and Orangewood Avenue shall be dedicated to the City
of Anaheim.
4. That in accordance with City Council Policy, a six-foot masonry
wall shall be constructed on the northerly and easterly property lines sep-
arating Lot Nos. 24 through 48 and Orangewood Avenue and Lewis Street, except
that corner Lots Nos. 24 and 25 shall be stepped down to a height of thirty
inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall
b~ provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highway rights-
of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irri-
gation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the ar-
terial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said land-
scaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of
Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
6. That Sealig Circle shall be abandoned prior to approval of the
final tract map.
7. That the proposed north-south street shall be cu1-de-saced
south of Orangewood Avenue and a street provided to Lewis Street.
Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5123, be ap-
proved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Coun-
cilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-92 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1033:
Submitted by Dr. G.P. Brooks, requesting a change in zone from R-1 to C-O,
to permit the office use of a residential structure, with waivers of minimum
required number of parking spaces and site area, property located at 3341 West
Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l56,
recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No.
PC68-157 denied said conditional use permit.
Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to
and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called Council attention
to application for c-o zoning previously submitted and denied, involving
subject property and two adjoining parcels (66-67-4), and reported that a
building permit was issued a few months later for home alteration; that be-
cause of the nature and magnitude of the alteration, a letter was sent to
the owner pointing out that the C-1 zoning had been denied, and the property
could be used for R-I purposes only. Mr. Thompson further noted that the
City Planning Commission referred to the recent "Front-On Study", wherein
subject property had been included and was considered not suitable for poten-
tial Commercial use.
68-390
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Thompson indicated
that the building permit referred to had been issued; however, no commercial
use of the property has been made to the knowledge of the planning staff.
Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City
Council.
(1
Dr. G.P. Brooks, 3341 West Ball Road, explained that he established
residence on the subject property twelve years ago when it was in County
territory, and since that time considerable commercial and residential growth
had taken place in the immediate area. He described the commercial develop-
ment directly across Ball Road which includes a hospital) medical clinic and
shopping center, indicating his approval of this use; and asked consideration
of his application in view of the predominant zoning trend in the area. He
stated that his intent is not to sell the property if his petition is granted,
but to use it to practice his profession.
In response to the Mayor's question, Dr. Brooks indicated he would
like to continue living in the home, but would move if this is not permitted.
City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that residential use of C-1
or c-o zoned property was prohibited under the zoning ordinance.
In answer to Councilman Dutton, Dr. Brooks stated that the recent
alterations performed on his residence were made in the hope that the property
could be rezoned for commercial use; further, he felt that the architectural
changes made were an asset to the area.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition.
Mrs. Dorothy Brennan, 2104 West Judith Lane, objected m a commer-
cial sign in a residential area, and felt that the proper location for a
chiropractic office was in a medical suite.
1
Mrs. Emily Le Desma, 3342 West Deerwood, located directly behind
subject property, objected to the traffic hazard to her children which would
be created in the alley behind her home, and referred m deed restrictions
on the tract which prohibit commercial use for a period of 25 years.
The City Attorney advised that deed restrictions are enforced as a
private matter, and the Council cannot be bound by deed restrictions in the
exercise of its legislative function.
Mrs. Le Desma felt subject property should continue to be used as
a residence, citing the existence of empty office space available, and stated
that the general welfare of her home and family would be endangered should
commercial zoning be approved $
Mr. Joseph Seymour, 3347 West Ball Road, spoke in support of sub-
ject reclassification, stating that the trend is to commercial zoning in that
area, and that Dr. Brooks' structure would improve the area.
Mr. John Hamilton, 2203 Vern Street, also favored subject reclassi-
fication on the basis of compatibility with surrounding land use and traffic
conditions. He pointed out that the residential property to the north was
separated by an alley and was located on a separate street. He also called
attention to the proposed Orange route of the Huntington Beach Freeway which,
if it materializes, will bring more traffic into the area.
,~
Councilman Dutton asked the applicant if the owners of the two par-
cels immediately adjacent to the subject property on Ball Road were interested
in seeking commercial zoning, to which Dr. Brooks replied affirmatively, add-
ing that the reclassification petition that had been denied in 1966 included
these two parcels. He felt denial may have been predicated on the fact that
no specific plans for development were submitted, and pointed out that at
this time he had a definite purpose in seeking rezoning.
68-391
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Krein noted that the subject property was only 6,500
square feet in area, and the minimum area required under C-O zoning is
20,000 square feet; which is a size that would be required for a desirable
development.
ri
Dr. Brooks as~ed if his application could be approved with the
possibility of the other two parcels being rezoned subsequently, as the
location on a major thoroughfare is no longer suitable for residential use.
Councilman Krein suggested all three property owners submit an ap-
plication for c-o zoning, as the size of the combined parcels would meet
the minimum site requirement, and the City Attorney advised that although
under C-l zoning there is no minimum site requirement, C-l zoning is less
restrictive, and would allow heavier commercial use, particularly if the
residential structure is removed.
The Zoning Supervisor noted again that the City Planning Commiss-
ion felt that the subject property should be retained for R-l use; that there
are 2,100 lots fronting or siding on arterial highways, all of which cannot
be used for commercial purposes; and the City Planning Commission is in the
process of implementing the "Front-On Study" by allowing walls to be built
in front yards which would retain the desirability of the property for resi-
dential use.
Dr~ Brooks failed to understand why areas in which no commercial
development presently exists were being recommended for commercial use, yet
his property, which is located in an established commercial area, is recom-
mended for denial.
r-
There being no further evidence offered, Mayor Pebley declared the
hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-395: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-395 for
adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-92.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-92.)
Roll Call Vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-395 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-396: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-396
for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 1033.
Refer to Resolution Book.
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1033.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-396 duly passed and adopted.
68-392
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
REPORT - FRONT-ON STUDY~ Assistant Development Services Director, Robert Mickel-
son, briefed the City Council and again distributed copies of a report of
the Development Services Department entitled "A Study of the Problem of Resi-
dential Homes Fronting on Arterial Highways," noting that the next five pub-
lic hearings on the Council agenda were initiated as a result of this recently
completed study.
He noted the location of the properties under consideration, the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate areas, and briefed the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission in arriving at
criteria used to determine which properties are more suitable for commercial
re-use and which are more desirable for retention for residential purposes.
In answer to Councilman Dutton's questions regarding the reason-
ing behind the actions initiated by the City Planning CommisSion, Mr. Mickel-
son explained that previous contact with the property owners in the areas
affected by the study had indicated an interest on their part in implement-
ing the recommendations; he agreed that rezoning for commercial re-use would
probably have an affect on future tax assessment of the properties.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-93 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 89:
Reclassification initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider a
change in zone from R-A and R-2 to C-l; property composed of seven lots
generally located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert
Street; Area Development Plan to consider secondary access solution.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l70,
as amended by Resolution No. PC68-20S, recommended Parcell of said reclas-
sification for approval, subject to the following conditions, and recommended
Parcel 2 be denied:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the centerline of the street
along Gilbert Street, for street widening purposes.
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en-
gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Gilbert Street and Lincoln
Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drain-
age facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications
on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City
to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Gilbert Street and Lincoln
Avenue, for street lighting purposes.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Gilbert Street and Lincoln Ave-
nue, for tree planting purposes.
5. That all access points shall be in accordance with Area Devel-
opment Plan No, 89.
6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro-
perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered away from adja-
cent residential homes.
8. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and
away from abutting parcels.
9. That any structures which are proposed for conversion from
residential to commercial uses shall be brought up to the minimum standards
of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Electrical Codes, as adopted by the
City of Anaheim.
10. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be
complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur-
ther time as the City Council may grant.
II. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
12. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopted
as and when each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to
such parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently
1-'
--,
:-;
68-393
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Julv 9~ 1968~ 1:30 P.M.
existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City
Council for a lot split.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-171,
recommended said Area Development Plan be disapproved.
~I
Mayor Pebley left the Council Chambers, (2:55 P.M.), and Council-
man Krein assumed chairmanship of the meeting.
Assistant Planner DoLo Brown noted the location of subject property,
the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that
the General Plan indicated Commercial-Professional uses for the eight parcels
located in the subject area, seven of which are included in subject reclas-
sification; that one parcel has been zoned for R-2 development (62-63-90);
that subject reclassification would require an additional 12 foot dedica-
tion to be developed commercially, thereby reducing front yards to 8 feet,
which would not meet the commercial site development standards and would
necessitate removal or relocation of the existing homes in order to conform;
that Area Development Plan #89 was initiated for the purpose of providing
secondary access to parcels in Portion No.2, as illustrated in Exhibits
"A" and "B" posted on wall; that in recommending approval of subject reclas-
sification on Portion No. 1 only, denial of the subject Area Development Plan
was indicated, as it affected only Portion No.2.
Councilman Krein asked if anyone in the audience wished to address
the Council.
r-
i
Mr. James Hill, 213 North Gilbert Street, spoke in opposition to
the proposed Area Development plan, and objected to the widening of Gilbert
Street on the basis that it would be used for parking by Savanna High School
students.
Councilman Dutton pointed out that the five northerly lots were
not recommended for approval in the subject reclassification; that Mr. Hill
might apply for multi~family residential zoning if he desired; to which Mr.
Hill replied it was not his intent to do so.
Councilman Krein asked if anyone else wished to speak; there being
no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-397: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68a-397 for
adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-93.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN ARIA OF THE CITY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67~68-93.)
Roll Call Vote:
r
AYES =
NOES:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT =
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEN =
CO UNa ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein and Clark
None
Pebley
Schutte
Councilman Krein declared Resolution No. 68R-397 duly passed and
adopted.
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 89: Councilman Clark moved that Area Development
Plan No. 89 be disapproved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-94 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOo 90:
Reclassification initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider a
change in zone from R-l to C-O; property fronting on the north side of Broad-
way, between Brookhurst Street and Garnet Street; Area Development Plan to
consider secondary access solution.
68-394
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9. 1968. 1:30 P.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l72,
recommended said reclassification be disapproved; and pursuant to Resolution
No. PC68-173, recommended said Area Development Plan be disapproved.
Mr. Brown noted the location of subject property, the existing uses
and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and
considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that although Commercia1-
Professional use was indicated on the General Plan, no zoning applications
had been made in recent years; and that a petition signed by 50 persons was
submitted and 30 persons appeared at the City Planning Commission public
hearing in opposition to said reclassification. He described Area Develop-
ment Plan No. 90, which would provide the necessary vehicular access required
if subject reclassification were approved.
He reported that in light of the foregoing considerations, the City
Planning Commission recommended subject property be designated as a residen-
tial retention area, instead of a potential C-O zone as recommended in the
Front-On Study.
Councilman Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Louis Kormendy, 2169 Victoria, stated he represented those op-
posing subject reclassification, and called attention to the petition on file
signed by 50 persons in opposition. He noted that four out of six property
owners in the subject area opposed the reclassification. He cited statis-
tics estimating a 12-20 percent vacancy factor in office space on Brookhurst
and Euclid Streets, and also called attention to deed restrictions on the
tract.
Mr. Timothy Daly, 2433 West Lincoln Avenue, spoke in favor of re-
classification at a future date. He stated that eventually Brookhurst should
be rezoned; that traffic at the corner of Brookhurst and Broadway makes resi-
dential use of that property undesirable, and C-l zoning exists on both sides
and across the street; however, he felt that an application should be made
at such time as development is proposed. Further, he did not wish to make
necessary street and alley dedication at this time, nor did he wish to in-
crease his taxes based on a higher use than presently exists.
Mr. David Michener, 2175 West Broadway, also opposed the subject
reclassification and advised that he, as a property owner, had not been con-
tacted relative to a possible change in zoning.
Councilman Krein asked if anyone else wished to be heard; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-398: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-398
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-94 as recommended by the
City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDo (67-68-94.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein and Clark
None
Pebley
Schutte
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Councilman Krein declared Resolution No. 68R-398 duly passed and
adopted.
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 90: Councilman Dutton moved that Area Development
Plan No. 90 be disapproved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
I~
~
i~
68-395
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Pebley returned to the Council Chambers, (3:20 P.M.).
1'""\
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68.95, AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 91, AND
G.ENERA1;._PLA~_~~MENT NO. 192: Reclassiffcation initiated by the City Planning
Commission to consider a change in zone from R-I to C-O, those eleven lots
fronting on the east side of Brookhurst Street between Harle Avenue and the
Southern California Edison Company easement; Area Development Plan to consider
secondary access solution; General Plan Amendment proposing change in land
use symbology from low density to commercial-professionale
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l65,
recommended said reclassification be disapproved; pursuant to Resolution No.
PC68-l66, recommended that Area Development Plan be disapproved; and pursuant
to Resolution NOe PC68-l64, recommended said General Plan Amendment be dis-
approved.
The City Clerk read petition received July 8, 1968, favoring ap-
proval of subject reclassification, signed by ten of the eleven property
owners as noted by the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Brown noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the City
Planning Commission recommended disapproval of all three proposals on the
basis that action at this time would be premature, as only one zoning appli-
cation had been submitted in recent years involving property in the subject
area, (Variance No. 1765, requesting permission to establish a beauty shop;
denied by the City Planning Commission and the City Council,) therefore, the
present use was deemed more appropriate.
i
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the pro-
posed reclassification.
Mrse Louis Fa1kowitz, 1606 South Brookhurst Street, addressed the
City Council in favor of proposed zoning and stated that she understood that
dedication and moving of the existing structure was not necessary until the
property is developed for commercial purposes; and that it is impossible to
sell, rent or obtain a loan on the property under the present zoning.
There being no others wishing to speak in favor, Mayor Pebley called
for opposition.
Mrs. Elizabeth Smith, 1607 South Lamar Street, presented and read
a petition signed by 45 people in opposition to the subject reclassification.
Mr. B.W. Morris, 1625 Lamar Street, also spoke in opposition, chal-
lenging the number of signatures of those purporting to be property owners
on the petition read by the City Clerk in support of subject reclassifica-
tion, stating that there are not ten different owners of the eleven parcels
under consideration.
~
I
!
The City Clerk read the signatures in question, and clarified ear-
lier reference to them to mean ten of the eleven names noted as owners by
the City Planning Commission appeared on the petition favoring reclassifica-
tion.
Mr. Morris further noted that none of the structures would meet
Commercial Code requirements.
In summary, Mr. Morris pointed out that more people opposed the
proposed reclassification than supported it, and felt that approval would
not be in the best interests of the majority involved.
Mr. James E. Britt, 2126 West Harle Avenue, also expressed opposi-
tion, citing an article in the July 5, 1968, issue of the Orange County Edi-
tion, Los Angeles Times, entitled "Instant Slums."
68-396
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to speak, there being no
response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-399: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-399 for
adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-95, as recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
~
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDo (67-68-95).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-399 duly passed and adopted.
AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 91: Councilman Dutton moved that Area Development
Plan No. 91 be disapproved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 102: Councilman Dutton moved that General Plan
Amendment No. 102 be disapproved, as recommended by the City Planning Com-
mission. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a ten-minute recess; Councilman Dutton second-
ed the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:00 P.M.).
~
I
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council, except Councilman Schutte, being present.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-~8-96A AR~ D~ELOPMENT PLAN NO. 92 AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 103: Reclassification initiated by the City Planning
Commission to consider a change in zone from R-l to C-O, four parcels of
land located on the north side of Katella Avenue, generally located east of
Brookhurst Street and west of Dallas Drive; Area Development Plan to consider
secondary access solution; General Plan Amendment to consider change in land
use symbology from low density to commercial-professional.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l68,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 60 feet in width from the centerline of the street,
including a IS-foot radius corner return, along Katella Avenue, for street
widening purposes.
2. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley
openings to Katella Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Katella Avenue, William Miller
Drive, Garden Drive and Dallas Drive, for street lighting purposes.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of ls~ per front foot along Katella Avenue, William Miller
Drive, Garden Drive and Dallas Drive, for tree planting purposes.
5. That secondary circulation shall be provided in accordance
with Area Development Plan No. 92.
6. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Katella Avenue,
and William Miller Drive, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City En-
gineer.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
~
\
68-397
City Ha11~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1~30 P.M.
r
8. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro-
perly shielded from view and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent resi-
dential homes.
9. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away
from abutting parcels.
10. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be
complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur-
ther time as the City Council may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
12. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopt-
ed as and when each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to
each parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently
existing parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split.
The C~ty Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l69,
recommended said Area Development Plan be disapproved, and pursuant to Reso-
lution No. PC68-l67, recommended said General Plan Amendment be approved in
accordance with Exhibit "A".
The City Clerk read communication dated July 9, 1968, submitted
by Mr. and Mrs. John F. Gibbs, 1749 South William Miller Drive, opposing
subject reclassification.
r
I
Mr. Brown noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the City
Planning Commission recommended disapproval of Area Development Plan No. 92
on the basis that the additional dedications required for street widening
and alley access would produce drastic reduction in lot size; that approval
of subject reclassification and General Plan Amendment would indicate future
development by a land assecbly method.
Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council.
Mr. William Schwenn, 1771 South Garden Drive, spoke in favor of
the proposed reclassification, stating that the homes were no longer suit-
able for residential use due to the increased traffic which generates noise
and a higher incidence of accidents in the subject area. He cited the need
for a continuous left-turn lane on Katella Avenue, which dedication would
make possible. He reported difficulty in selling the property for any use
under the existing zoning.
The Mayor requested a show of hands of those present who owned
property facing Katella and favored subject reclassification (6); those op-
posed (0); those residing in the subject area on street other than Katella
Avenue in favor (0); those opposed (5).
r
Mr. John A.Miller, 1761 South William Miller Drive, read and sub-
mitted a petition containing approximately 175 signatures expressing oppo-
sition to subject reclassification and Area Development Plan. He claimed
that should the reclassification be approved, only 15 property owners would
benefit, whereas all others would be hurt financially by devaluation of
their property due to additional traffic generated and lack of specific
plans for development which would encourage haphazard commercial development.
He pointed out that of the 15 property owners on Katella Avenue favoring
the reclassification, eight were absentee owners; that many of those object-
ing had made expensive improve~2nts to their homes.
Councilman Dutton explained that the City Council concurred with
the City Planning Commission in initiating the Front-On Study, to which Mr.
Miller repli:=c1 that the City Planning Commission recommended approval of the
reclassification although 75 percent of those affected by it were opposed.
Mr. C. Geall, 1775 South Dallas Drive, spoke in favor of the pro-
posed reclassification, stating that he made application for C-l zoning ap-
proximately two years ago and subsequentljT withdrew his request since he did
not have definite plans for development; that approval at this time would
make sale of his pFoperty possible.
68-398
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 91 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. William Dunn, 2118 West Midwood Lane, spoke in opposition,
citing hazardous traffic conditions which he felt would be increased by
on-street parking following the ultimate dedication which would make access
to Dallas Drive even more difficult, particularly if property is developed
in stages that would produce a zig-zag effect on the street boundary.
Mayor Pebley and Councilman Dutton called attention to the pro-
posed traffic signal at the corner of Katella Avenue and Nutwood Street,
to be jointly financed by the City of Anaheim and the City of Garden Grove,
and asked the City Engineer to investigate and report on the status of that
project.
Mr. Tuck Bose, 12411 Rebecca Lane, Santa Ana, who indicated own-
ership of a lot on the east side of Dallas Drive, spoke in favor of the
subject reclassification, as required street widening and sidewalks would
solve the problems created by the increased traffic on Katella Avenue.
Mrs. Ann Madison, representing Mr. and Mrs. John Leadford, 2113
West Katella Avenue, reported that her clients have had their property for
sale without any offers; that heavy traffic has effected a 20 percent de-
preciation in the market value of the property; and that commercial develop-
ment would be an asset to the area. She voiced concern regarding the 20,000
square feet minimum site requirement under C-O zoning, stating that indi-
vidual development of the lots, if sold, would be advisable since the price
of three combined lots would make c-o development prohibitive.
Mr. L.R. Fessenden, 1758 South Garden Drive, complained of rodents
in the neighborhood, and dirty conditions of the alley behind his home, and
attributed these conditions to the renters of the property on Katella Ave-
nue. He also called attention to the temporary traffic signal for the in-
tersection of Nutwood and Katella which was promised in February of this
year.
The City Engineer advised Mr. Fessenden that the signal was in-
cluded in the budget for the current fiscal year, and expected it to be
installed in approximately eight months.
Mr. William Vidt, 1766 South William Miller Drive, objected to
the reclassification on the basis that no specific plans for development
have been submitted.
Mrso L.M. Bose, 12411 Rebecca Lane, Santa Ana, reported that she
objected to single-family residential development of the subject area, feel-
ing that the County, in granting approval, made an error. She further stated
that children from the residential development played in the orange grove
located on her property, inflicting property damage which influenced her to
move elsewhere, leaving her with property on a major artery which should be
rezoned for commercial use.
The Mayor announced that sufficient evidence fIDm those present
had been received, and thereupon declared the hearing closed.
Discussion followed, Council being of the opinion that approval
of the subject reclassification was not indicated in the absence of any
specific plans for development.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-400: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-400
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-96.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED~ (67-68-96).
Roll Call Vote~
--,
.........
1
I
68-399
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-400 duly passed and adopted.
,--
Councilman Dutton moved that Area Development Plan No. 92 and
General Plan Amendment No. 103 be disapproved. Councilman Clark seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-97 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 93:
Reclassification initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider a
change in zone from R-1 to C-1; three lots located generally at the south-
east corner of Broadway and Fann Street; Area Development Plan to consider
secondary access solution.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l74,
recommended said reclassification be disapproved, and pursuant to Resolu-
tion No. PC68-l75, recommended said Area Development Plan be disapproved.
Mr. Brown noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and cQn.!de~ed by tho City Planning Commi~sion.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council.
r-
Mrs. Maxine Clayson, 401 Fann Street, submitted a petition bear-
ing 54 signatures opposing subject reclassification, and stated that the
area would be harmed by commercial development on lots too small, and felt
commercial zoning would increase the traffic hazard to children attending
Loara Elementary School. She noted the vacant commercial property across
the street, and advised such commercial developments need residential areas'
for support.
Mayor Pebley asked for additional evidence; there being none forth-
coming, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-401: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-401
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-97 as recommended by the
City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-97).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NO ES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
Councilman Dutton moved that Area Development Plan No. 93 be dis-
approved. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
r
I
REQUEST - OUTDOOR FLOWER SALES: Request by Federal Sign and Signal Corporation,
for permission conduct outdoor display and sales of flowers at "Thot'fu11
Stop Flowers" kiosk located in the parking :ot of the Ball-Brookhurst
Shopping Center, continued from Council meeting of June 11, 1968, for re-
port and recommendation.
The City Clerk briefed the report of the Development Services De-
partment which recommended that:
1. Where kiosks of this nature are proposed to be located in a
shopping mall or as an integral part of a commercial complex where they are
not readily visible from the street and would not pose traffic problems,
68-400
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
they be granted administrative approval for minor outdoor display and sales,
subject to approval of plans by the Development Service Department, and
2. Where kiosks of this nature are proposed to be located in
parking lots or other external locations (where visible from the street),
such outdoor sales should only be permitted subject to the granting of a
variance for such use.
The Zoning Supervisor reported that the kiosk has been installed,
and is in operation.
Mr. Miles Bader, Regional Leasing Manager of Thot'full Stop Flowers,
Inc., addressed the Council, stating that ample parking spaces exist in the
shopping center to accommodate the operation; that the shopping center plans
to allow other similar operations in the future; that no complaints had been
received regarding impairment of pedestrian and vehicular traffic; and no
complaints had been registered at other "Thot'full Stop" locations; that
the operation was similar to that of the Kodak operation in the same shopp-
ing center, and that the main objection seems to be directed toward the out-
door display. He referred to the existence of numerous businesses which
feature displays underneath an awning or overhang, and offered to install a
two-foot canvas or metal overhand and move the display underneath, if it
would comply with requirements; and also offered to provide fencing if re-
quired.
Mr. Bader then outlined an alternate proposal which involved moving
the kiosk to the vicinity of the proposed post office and requested permis-
sion, if this alternate is approved, to remain in the present location for
approximately four months until a cement pad can be installed in the new 10-
cafion.
Mr. Thompson noted that an application for a variance might be
filed by the applicants if they wish to remain in the present location, or
the kiosk could be relocated to a point which would meet the requirements
of recommendation (1) in the Development Services Department report.
COUNCIL POLICY: On motion of Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the recommendations of the Development Services Department were approved
and adopted as Council Policy. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER - 4225 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE: Request of Fredricks Development
Corporation for temporary waiver of sidewalks at 4225 East La Palma Avenue,
was submitted.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton
moved that said temporary waiver be granted, subject to the condition that
no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within
the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE - NATIONAL CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: Request sub-
mitted by Chloe Karr, Executive Director, National Cystic Fibrosis Founda-
tion, for waiver of business license at 1661 West Broadway, was granted on
motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 4241: Request of C.J. Queyrel, Anacal Engineering
Company, for one-year extension of time to Tentative Map, Tract No. 4241,
was submitted and granted, as recommended by the City Engineer, on motion
by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held June 17, 1968, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1034: Submitted by Voge, Incorporated, request-
ing permission to allow on-sale beer and wine in conjunction with an exist-
ing restaurant, C-l zoned property, located at 801 South State College Boule-
vard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-178,
granted said Conditioual Use Permit, subject to conditions.
-,
--,
--,
!
68-401
City Ha11~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9. 1968~ 1:30 P.M.
VARIANCE NO. 1990: Submitted by David Dow, requesting a waiver of permitted
uses to permit a retail tire, battery and accessory store; C-1 zoned pro-
perty, located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Brookhurst Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l79,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
r
l
VARIANCE NO. 1991: Submitted by Milton Wintrob, requesting waivers of mini-
mum required rear yard and building setback to permit an addition to an ex-
isting single-family residence, R-1 zoned property, located at 1527 Chateau
Avenue.
The City Planning COmmiSS1Qn, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-181,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO. 1992: Submitted by William M. Roeschlaub, requesting waivers
of maximum building height and minimum permitted size of covered parking
spaces, to permit the construction of a two-story, two-unit apartment build-
ing, R-3 zoned property, located at 731 and 733 North Lemon Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l80,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO. 1993: Submitted by Alvin F. Nellesen, requesting waivers of
minimum lot area and minimum lot width, to permit a lot split of an exist-
ing R-l (single-family) lot, R-l zoned property, located at 1167 Cherry Way.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l82,
granted said variance, subject to conditions.
n
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1032: City Planning Commission Resolution No.
PC68-l87 was submitted, recommending amendment to Resolution No. PC68-l55,
Condition No.9, requiring that parking be relocated toward the easterly
property line, property located at 1648 West Broadway. (Petition previously
granted to establish an existing church facility as a conforming use at the
City Council meeting of June 25, 1968.)
VARIANCE NO. 1898: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC68-188 was sub-
mitted, reinstating Variance No. 1898, and deleting conditions approving said
petition, submitted by John Balaam, requesting permission for addition of a
carport and six-foot fence, with waivers of fence location and rear yard cov-
erage, R-2 zoned property, located at southwest corner of South and Lemon
Streets.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 702~ Submitted by First Christian Church of Ana-
heim, (Dahl property), requesting an extension of time; property located on
the south side of South Street, west of Harbor Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted a six-month exten-
sion of time to said conditional use permit, to expire December 13, 1968.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 985: Submitted by Elizabeth Law and Don Davis,
requesting an exten~ion of time, property located on the east side of Beach
Boulevard, north of Orange Avenue.
r
The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted a six-month exten-
sion of time to said conditional use permit, to expire December 18, 1968.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 780: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC68-
189 was submitted, terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No.
780, previously granted to William C. and Ada I. Higdon, to permit the es-
tablishment of a travel trailer park on property located on the west side
of Beach Boulevard, north of Lincoln Avenue.
CONDITIONAL USE [ERMIT NO. 803~ City Planning Commission Resolution No.PC68-
190 was submitted, terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No.
803, previously granted to Harry Jung Enterprises, Inc., to permit an auto
rental agency on an established service station site, property located at
the northwest corner of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard.
68-402
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Jul~ 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 894: City Planning Commission Resolution NODPC68-
192, terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 894 previously
granted to Alwyn S. Jewell to permit the establishment of a l2-story office
building, property located on the north side of Kate1la Avenue, east of Harbor
Boulevard.
VARIANCE NO. 1917: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC68-l93, terminat-
ing aill hProceedbin1gishon varifance NOD 19i171 bPreiv1diOiUS1Y granted t10 petde warnhOff to h ~
perm t t e eata a ment 0 a commerc a u ng, property ocate on t e sout
side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Bush Street. j
The above actions were reviewed by the Council and no further action
taken on the foregoing conditional use permits and '/ariance applications.
PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGES - KlRALOMA AVENUE AND SUNKIST STREET: City Planning
Commission Resolution No. PC68-l94 was submitted, recommending Miraloma Avenue
and Sunkist Street overpass of the Riverside Freeway and those cul-de-sac por-
tions be re-named Miraloma Way and Sunkist Way.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-402: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-402 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAMES OF
CERTAIN STREETS IN THE NORTHEASTEro~ A~(EA OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Miraloma Avenue
and Sunkist Street.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
~
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-402 duly passed and adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 872: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC68-l9l
was submitted, recommending termination of all proceedings on said Conditional
Use Permit previously granted to Elden Kanagae, to permit establishment of a
beer bar in a shopping center located to the west and south of the service
station at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Dale Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-403~ Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-403
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PRO-
CEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 872 AND DECLARING
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-617 NULL AND VOID.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-403 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 66591 Developer - J.WD Klug Development Company, tract
located on the west side of Rio Vista Street, between Lincoln Avenue and Mardi
Gras, containing 107 proposed R-l lots.
--,
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said
Tentative Map was continued to be considered in conjunction with Reclassifi-
cation No. 68-69-4 and Variance No. 1995. MOTION CARRIED.
,
68-403
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-68-99 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 95 - REQUEST FOR
EVENING PUBLIC HEARING: Petition dated June 21, 1968, was submitted, requesting
the City Council to schedule public hearing on Reclassification No. 67-68-99
and Area Development Plan No. 95 in the evening.
,~
':C,-:~lC=- :I:'"~an C: rlr:;. c_cO-,/C\' co s~he(tule said public hearing for July
30, ]_~)St, 7: i-I P.U. COl.<.l._L~~Jan K;:3in. seconded the mot::.onc MOTION
CAnDIED.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: Councilman Clark offered Resolution Nos. 68R-404
and 68R-405 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-404 -" WORK ORDER NO. 547-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, 10 WIT: MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
AT THE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND CONVENTION WAY, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 547-B, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAW-
INGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CON-
STRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECI-
FICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A
NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to
be opened August 1, 1968, 2:00 P.M.)
-
I
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-405 - WORK ORDER NO. 3509: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, 10 WIT: THE YORBA SUBSTATION, LA PALMA AVENUE AT ORCHARD DRIVE,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 3509, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHOR-
IZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be opened August 1, 1968, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
COUNCILMEN~ None
COUNCILMEN: Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 68R-l:.'4 and 68R-40S duly passed
and ac1opted.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION: On the recommendation of the City Engineer, it was
moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized to sign Right-of-Way Certification in connection
with the right-af-way for A.HoF.P. Street Improvement Project No. 388, Wes-
tern Avenue, from north city limits to south city limits. MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 68R-406 to 68R-4l0,
both inclusive, for adoption.
n
!
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4J6: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR POLES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES AND OVERHEAD
C~W~\~-A}~h":; ~j~D ELECTRIC POWER LINES. (Whittle, Pralle and Case.)
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-407: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC POWER LINES, POLES AND
APPURTENANCES 0 (Richard T. and Jean M. Mc Alpine.)
68-404
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1~30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NOo 68R-408: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES 0
(Orange County Flood Control District.)
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-409: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED FROM LAWRENCE A. MUCKENTHALER AND
NELLIE MUCKENTHALER, FOR SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO MAKE PAYMENT FOR THE SAME.
(Lawrence A. Muckenthaler.)
'1
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4l0: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE A RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (Hiroshi
Fujishige.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution NOI. 68a-406 to 68R-410, botb inc1u-
sive,du1y passed and adopted.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Stephen Proctor for personal property
damages, purportedly resulting from collision with a City truck on or about
June 18, 1968, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered
referred to the insurance agent, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded
by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIEDo
~
REPORT - ACCIDENT: Report was submitted by the Anaheim Convention Center for
Council information, involving personal injury to Charles Sullivan, purport-
edly resulting from accidental discharge of gun on or about June 22, 1968.
SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: The City Manager reported on the independent ap-
praisal authorized by the City Council June 18, 1968, on City-owned property
located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia, and recommended
that the sale thereof be authorized to Western Shopping Center for the sum
of $34,750.00 on condition that the purchaser assume responsibility for
abandoning the well.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4ll: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-4ll for
adoption, as recommended by the City Manager.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THERE-
OF.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES ~
NO ES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
CODNCI LMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
~
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-4l~ duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on purchase of a Turf Vac to
replace one destroyed by fire, (insurance to cover approximately one-half
the purchase price,) and advised that the one manufacturer, Turf Vac, has
submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $3,045.53.
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved
that purchase of a Turf Vac be authorized in the amount of $3,045.53, in-
cluding tax4 Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
68-405
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchse of 35 - 100 KVAR-7200 Volt Standard Line Capacitors, as fol-
lows, and recommended acceptance of the quotation of General Electric
Company, as the lowest and best bid meeting specifications:
r
Vendor Total Price,
Standard
McGraw-Edison Company, Los Angeles - - - - -$5,659.50
Sangamo Electric, Los Angeles - - - - - - - 5,659.50
Westinghouse Electric Co., Los Angeles - - - 6,063.75
General Electric Co., Los Angeles - - - -No Bid
Including Tax
Plastic Film
No Bid
$6,615.00
6,615.00
6,615.00
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Krein
moved that the low bid of General Electric Company be accepted and pur-
chase authorized in the amount of $6,615.00, including tax. Councilman
Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on the necessary purchase of Convention
Center Brochures, and advised that the Visitors and Convention Bureau
authorized printing of 105,000 four-color folders from Continental Gra-
phics, cost of which totals $4,401.34; $1,000.00 of which will be paid
by the Visitors and Convention Bureau.
On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved
that purchase be approved and authorized payment of the City's share of
the cost of printing said brochures. Councilman Clark seconded the mo-
tion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4l2: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-4l2 for
adoption, on recommendation of t he City Engineer.
,,--
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE
MODIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM AND
HIGHWAY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EUCLID STREET WITH STATE HIGHWAY
ROUTE 07-0RA-2l4 7.1 (LINCOLN AVENUE) AND CHANNELIZATION ON LINCOLN AVENUE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-4l2 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED:
,--.
a. City of Orange Resolution No. 2961 - requesting that the
Federal Aviation Administration consider the undesirable features of es-
tablishing a metroport at the location proposed in Airspace Case No. 68-
LAX-54-NR and that the Federal Aviation Administration reject the proposed
site as an appropriate location for said metroport.
b. Orange County Grand Jury Resolution - regarding privately-
owned mobile X-ray units.
c. City of Long Beach Mayor - requests Council adopt a resolu-
tion supporting the application of the Pacific Southwest Airlines before
the Public Utilities Commission.
d. Division of Highways - California Highway Commission will
hold public hearing July 26, 1968, to n2lp determine the location of about
seven miles of the future Huntington Beach (Route 39) Freeway in Orange
County.
e. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Case No. 8102 - var-
ious crossings at grade of the lines of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Railway Company, the Union Pacific Railroad, the Southern Pacific Company
and the Pacific Electric Railway Company.
68-406
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
f. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application Noo
50248 - Skybus, Inc.
g. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of May and
June, 1968.
ORDINANCE NO. 2536: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance NOD 2536 for adoption.
-,
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-30 - C-l).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2536 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2537: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2537 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.40, SECTION
4.40.010 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO FORTUNE TELLING.
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S :
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
~
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2537 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2538: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2538 for adoption.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
cIpAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGD (67-68-50 - R-3.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2538 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2539: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Noo 2539 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-64 - C-l and R-3.)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: Application submitted by Lloyd E.
Carmichael and James E. Nye, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine, Person-to-Person
Transfer for National Convenience Stores, Inco, DBA Stop-N-Go Market at
1107 West South Street, Anaheim, (C-l zone), was presented by the City
Manager to the City Council for their information.
~
No Council action was taken on said application.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4l3: On recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton
offered Resolution No. 68R-4l3 for adoption.
68-407
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Julv 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT EMPLOYING ROSE & FEARS, ARCHI-
TECTS, TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUC-
TION OF PHASE III OF THE CORPORATION AND UTILITIES YARD AT 901 EAST VERMONT
AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIMs
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-4l3 duly passed and adopted.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS~ On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Krein moved
to transfer funds in the amount of $480.85 from Council Contingency Fund to
Community Promotion Fund. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
MEETING - GEORGE COLOURIS PRODUCTIONS~ The City Manager reminded Council of a
meeting with George Colouris for presentation of a proposed advertising ap-
proach scheduled for July 16, at 11:00 A.M., at the Convention Center.
,..-..
CITIZENS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE REPORTS: The City Manager reported that
the Citizens Capital Improvement Committees are ready to present their re-
ports, and recommended reports and recommendations be heard beginning as
soon as possible after July 21, 1968. Council authorized the City Manager
to schedule public meetings, the first being the Public Buildings Committee
on July 22, 1968, at 7:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers.
The City Council concurred with the recommendation of the City
Manager in appointing the chairman and vice-chairman of each of the five
committees to the Priority Ways and Means Committee which will review var-
ious priorities and methods of financing upon completion of the series of
presentations.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT INSPECTION TRIP: The City Manager reported the annual
Metropolitan Water District trip is scheduled for November 14, 15, 15, and
17, 1968, and two options are available; t~e northern facilities of the Cali-
fornia State Water Project, or the Parker Dam area. The Council elected the
Parker Dam area trip.
PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Lewis R. Olivos, Jr., for permit to
conduct public dance on July 13, 1968, at the Anaheim Room, Anaheim Conven-
tion Center, was submitted and granted subject to the provisions of Chapter
4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and also subject to the condition that
four police officers and one matron be hired to police said event, as recom-
mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-4l4: On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Krein
offered Resolution No. 68R-4l4 for adoption.
"..--..
I
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CON-
TROL DISTRICT WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF THE SPINNAKER
STORM DRAIN. (Pacifico to Katella).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley
None
Schutte
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-4l4 duly passed and adopted.
68-408
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 9, 1968, 1:30 P.M.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendation of the City Manager, the following tran-
sactions were authorized:
a. Carryover $2,483,665.29 from unexpended various Capital funds
to complete projects commenced in the 1967-68 fiscal year, on motion by Coun-
cilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED.
b. Transfer of $750,000.00 from Una110cated Funds to Capital Outlay
Fund, on motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION
CARRIED.
WATER RIGHTS - SANTA ANA VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY: The City Attorney reported on
water rights-of the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company, and recommended Council
authorize the staff to take appropriate action to preserve the rights.
Councilman Dutton moved the City Attorney's staff be author-
ized to take appropriate action to preserve the water and water rights
owned by the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company for Orange County, in-
cluding the bringing of eminent domain proceedings if such rights are
not acquired by the Orange County Water District. Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Council-
man Clark, Councilman Dutton was granted permission to leave the State for
thirty days, to attend the meeting of the International Association of Chiefs
of Police in Honolulu, on October 6, 1968. MOTION CARRIED.
It was agreed by the Council that any member wishing to attend the
International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference be so authorized.
REPORT - ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS, INC.: Councilman Clark reported that the Anaheim
Jitney Systems, Inc. is complying with Council requests for expansion of ser-
vices as evidenced by the purchase of one additional unit, with another on
order for the month of August, 1968. He stated they are making runs on a
regular schedule, and are ready to post signs and schedules.
On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, prep-
aration of 50 signs marked "Jitney Stop", to be erected at various locations
by the Anaheim Jitney, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
HUNTINGTON BEACH FREEWAY - PROPOSED ORANGE ROUTE: Councilman Clark reported on
requests for official opposition to the proposed Orange Route of the Hunting-
ton Beach Freeway, as adoption of the southerly segment now under considera-
tion will affect the probable routing through the City of Anaheim.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Council requested a lunch-
eon meeting be arranged for information purposes on July 17 or 19, 1968, to
which a representative of the State Division of Highways will be invited to
brief the Council and representatives of the press on the status of the var-
ious proposed routes.
ADJOURNMENT:
motion.
Councilman Krein moved to adjourn.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Dutton seconded the
ADJOURNED: 6:00 P.M.
SIGNED
g~~ )~. ?~4~~
City Clerk
-----
~
---.