Loading...
Resolution-ZA 1999-07• DECISION NO. ZA 99-7 U A DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.98-246 OWNER: Raymond Paul Dinkier and Geraldine H. Dinkier P.O. Box 8417 Hastings, Nebraska 68901 AGENT: Amador Gonzalez, Jr. 3151Airway Avenue #J-3 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 LOCATION: Two parcels consisting of: (1) A 2.7-acre in'egulariy-shaped parcel located between Frontera Street and Jackson Street approximately 260 feet east of the centerline of Park Ysta Street, and having frontages of 437 feet on the south side of Frontera Street and 162 feet on the north side of Jackson Street; and (2) A 1.8 acre in'egulariy-shaped parcel having frontages of 100 feet and 231 feet on the south side of Jackson Street, a maximum depth of 344 feet, and located approximately 720 feet east of Park Vista Street. HEARING DATE: March 11, 1999 OPPOSITION: No one indicated their presence atthe public hearing in opposition and no correspondence in opposition was received. REQUEST: To establish a 2-lot residential_subdivision in the RS-A-43,000(0) (Residential/Agricultural-Oil Overiay) Zone. Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced .petition and a .public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the date set forth above,l do hereby find: That the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Anaheim General Plan because the proposal map is consistent with the Medium Density Residential land use designation. 2.. That the design and/or.:improvement:ofahe proposedsubdivision.is;.consistent with_the_General<_<.~-- . _, - _ __:-. Plan. 3. That the design of he subdivision orthe proposed improvements_are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely #o cause serious public health problems. 5. That the design ofahe: subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at .large, for access through or use of the. property within the proposed subdivision. TP98-246.doc -1 of 2 - ZA 99-7 • CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Zoning Administrator has reviewed the proposal to establish a 2-lot residential subdivision in the RS-A-43,000(0) (Residential/Agricultural-Oil Overlay) Zone on property consisting of two parcels: (1) a 2.7-acre irregulariy-shaped parcel located between Frontera Street and Jackson Street approximately 260 feet east of the centeriine of Park Ysta Street, and having frontages of 437 feet on the south side of Frontera Street and 162 feet on the north side of Jackson Street; and (2) a 1.8 acre irregulariy-shaped parcel having frontages of 100 feet and 231. feet on the south side of Jackson Street, a maximum depth of 344 feet, and located approximately 720 feet east of Park Vista Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that she has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt under Class 15, Section 15061(b)(15) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.) Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Tentative Parcet Map No. 98-246., subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, Final Parcel Map 9&246 shall be approved by the City Engineer and then reconied in the Office of the Orange County Recorcier. 2. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 18th day of March, 1999. ~9~/~j/ ~~ ~~ O nnika M. Santalahti, Zoning Administrator ~t~/ I NOTICE: This decision:shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with he City :Clerk within 10 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unlessmembers of the City Council,shall request#o review this decision within said 10 days. DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty. of perjury that on the date set forth below, l did deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision #o the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk. .... DATE: March 18, 1999 Patricia Koral, Word Pro sing Operator 04/14/99 -CORRECTED PAGE 2 TP98-246.doc - 2 of 2 - ZA 99-7 • DECISION NO. ZA 99-7 A DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.98-246 OWNER: Raymond Paul Dinkier and Geraldine H. Dinkier P.O. Box 8417 Hastings, Nebraska 68901 AGENT: Amador Gonzalez, Jr. 3151Airway Avenue #J-3 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 LOCATION: Two parcels consisting of: (1) a 2.7-acre irregularly-shaped parcel located between Frontera Street and Jackson Street approximately 260 feet east of the centerline of Park Vsta Street, and having frontages of 437 feet on the south side of Frontera Street and 162 feet on the north side. of Jackson .Street; and (2) a 1.8 acre irregularly-shaped parcel having frontages of 100 feet and 231 feet on the south side of Jackson Street, a maximum depth of 344 feet, and located approximately-720 feet east: of Park vista Street. HEARING DATE: March 11, 1999 OPPOSITION: No one indicated #heir presence at the public hearing in opposition and no correspondence in opposition was received. REQUEST: To establish a 2-lot residential subdivision in the RS-A-43,000(0) (Residential/Agricultural-Oil Overlay) Zone. Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director,: pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the date set forth above, t do hereby find: 1. That the proposed. subdivision is consistent'with the Anaheim General. Plan because the proposal map is consistent with the Medium Density Residential land use designation. 2. That he design and/or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially .and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. TP98-246.doc -1 of 2 - ZA 99-7 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Zoning Administrator has reviewed the proposal to establish a 2-lot residential subdivision in the RS-A-43,000(0) (ResidentiaVAgricultural-Oil Overlay). Zone on property consisting of two parcels: (1) a 2.7-acre irregularly-shaped. parcel located between Frontera Street and Jackson Street approximately 260 feet east of the centerline of Park Vista Street, and having frontages of 437 feet on the south side of Frontera Street and 162 feet on the north side of Jackson Street; and (2) a 1.8 acre irregularly-shaped parcel having frontages of 100 feet and 231 feet on the south side of Jackson Street, a maximum depth of 344 feet, and located approximately 720 feet east of Park Vista Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that she has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the proposed project is Categorically Exempt under Class 15, Section 15061(b)(15) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.) Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 98-246, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to final parcel map approval or grading approval, a drainage report shall be s miffed to the Development Services Div' ' for review and approval. The report shall addr drainage for the entire site. 2. That .prior t nal parcel m pproval, .the developer shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan. (WQMP) cifi identifying the best management practices that will be used on-site to control predictab Ilutants from storm water runoff. The WQMPshall be submitted to the Public Wo epartm DevelopmentServices Division for review and approval. WQMP shall pproved prior to a val of precise grading plans. 3. That any sewerand storm drain imp ments within these parcels shall be privately maintained. 4. That prior to issuance of a building permit, Final Parcel Map 98-246 shall be approved by the City Engineer and then recorded in the Oft'ice of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal regulations. Approval does `not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement...._ This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 18th day of March, 1999. C Annika M. Santalahti, Zoning Administrator NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeaC to the City Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City. Clerk within 10 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless members of the City Council shall request to review this decisionwithin said 10 days. DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: J do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set forth below,. I.did deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy: to the City Clerk. DATE: March 18, 1999 ~~~~~~ ~~~ Patricia Koval, Woad Processing Opera r TP98-246.doc - 2 of 2 - ZA 99-7