Loading...
Resolution-ZA 1999-46~_ r DECISION NO. ZA 99-46 A DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DENYING VARIANCE N0.4382 OWNER: Joseph G. Little 6991 E. va EI Estribo Anaheim, CA 92807 AGENT: Frank Joe Lopez 5390 Park Place Chino, CA 91710 LOCATION: 6991 East ~a EI Estribo CEQA STATUS: CEQA Categorical Exemption, Class 1 HEARING DATE: December 2, 1999 OPPOSITION: One person indicated his presence at the public. hearing in opposition to the proposal and no correspondence was received in opposition. REQUEST: Petitioner requests waiver of the following to construct a 2-story addition to an existing single-family residence in the RS-HS-22,000 (SC) (Residential, Single-Family -Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone: Sections 18.12.060.040 - Maximum structural height. 18.23.062.010 25 feet permitted; 31.5 feet proposed) and 18.84.042.010 Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the. above-referenced petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the date set forth above, I do hereby find: 1. That there are no special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity. 2. That strict application of the Zoning Code does not deprive this property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. 3. That, subject to certain design conditions, 10°~ of the overall roof area may be 30 feet high in the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay; but that approximately 13°~ of the existing roof area already exceeds 25 feet high and approval of this variance would result in about 19% of the roof height exceeding 25 feet. 4. That a roof structure, complimentary to the existing roof profiles and with a similar 12" x 12" pitch, could be designed to comply with the 25-foot building height limitation. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS: That the Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the.proposed project is Categorically Exempt, under Section 15061(b)(3), as defined in the State of California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report. Za-V4382.DOC -1 of 2 - ZA 99-46 },;.' ; 4 Based on the evidence and testimony. presented to me, I do hereby determine to deny Variance No. 4382. This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 9th day of December 1999. ~~. Annika M. Santalahti Zoning Administrator NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said 15 days. DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk. DATE: December 9, 1999 l Patricia Koral Senior Word Processing Operator 1 i Za-V4382.DOC - 2 of 2 - ZA 99-46