Resolution-ZA 2002-25vwwiv,• ,.v....
` A DECISION OF THE ZONING gDMINISTRATOR
APPROVING VARIANCE N0.2002-04519
OWNER: Heliodoro Torres
216 N. Dahlia Drive
Anaheim, CA 92801
l_OCAT'iON: 216 North Dahlia Drive
'CEQA STATUS: CEQA Categorical Exemption, Class 1
HEARING DATE: August 8, 2002..
OPPOSITION: No one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal, and
no correspondence in opposition was received.
REQUEST: Petitioner requests waiver of the following to construct an addition which encroaches
into the required front yard of asingle-family residence in the RS-7200 (Residential,
Single-Family) Zone:
Sections 18.12.060.050 - Minimum front yard setback.
and 18.28.063.0'10 22 feet required; 18 feet proposed}
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal
Code.Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced petition and a public hearing having been duly
noticed for and held on the date set forth above; i do hereby find:
1. That the minimum front yard requirement for this property was inadvertently identified as 25
feet, but that the correct requirement is 22 feet based on the Zoning Code which specifies a front setback
of "...not less than 25% of the depth of the lot" in the RS-7200 Zone; and that subject property is 89 feet
deep and, therefore, the front yard requirement is 22 feet {instead of 25 feet); and under Section
18.12.080.010.0101,this petition should have been advertised as an Administrative Adjustment because
the proposed deviation (4 fee#) from the required front yard setback is only 18% and the maximum
permitted deviation in connection with Administrative Adjustments is 20%.
2. That no objections, including no written objections, to this proposal were received during the 10
days following mailing of the public notice on July 26, 2002.
3. That based on this proposal having complied with the above-findings: a deviation of )ess than
20°!° from the Cade standard in acxordance with Section 18.12.080.010.0101, and no written objections to
the proposal having been received within 10 days following the mailing of the public notice in accordance
with Section 18.12.080.040, this petition, although advertised as a variance, shall be considered as an
Administrative Adjustment; and that~his variance is, therefore, approved.
ti
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, l do hereby determine to approve Variance No.
2002-04519, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the subject properhr shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
V2002-04519.doc =1 of 2 - ZA 2002-25
-y t
...
1.
2. That within a period of one (1) year.frbm the date of this Decision, the appropriate permits for the
proposed addition shalt be obtained from the Building Division. Extensions for further time to
, complete this condition may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.490 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent #hat it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to, compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 15'" day of August, 2002.
;. fi'nriika M. Saritalahti; Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied
by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or
unless members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said 15 days.
. DECLARATION OF SERVICE 13Y MAIL: { do hereby tlec{are under penaSty of perjury that on the date set
. forth ,below; i did deposit, in the United States Maif, a copy of the decision ~to the applicant and did forward
a copy to the City Clerk.
DATE: August 15, 2002 ~ ~ ~
G~'r i cA ~ C~ \G~..ac
Patricia Koral, Senior Word Processing Operator
.'`.
V2002-04519.doc - 2 of 2 - ZA 2002-25