Resolution-ZA 2002-41.. , .. ^s^ t ~ Fc ~ i. f -~ x- ~F. ~ ~ i~u, 'T`tn+k X'~s4~- «~~c r { • 3
,.... s.
~-
~'
~
a
.4 j s 'n~•
Y i
~#SE
"F
. }
'?
J
ii j S ~
-
,
~
.i2
t ~..
3
~s`
~
.~ ..
.
,.
_...
. .,
.: '.:.i
,- . ;~ ~. DECISION NO. ZA 2002-41 ,° _ ~ .
....,...
....
_
,,
-..
A DEC1$LON OF THE.ZONING ADMINLSTRATOR ''
_:.
,.
APPROVING VARIANCE NO.`2002=04541 ~ - '
_..
OWNERS:
Roberto Zuaza Ochoa and Adela V. Zuazo
1137 S; Clarence Street
__...:.. _:__ _ . .
...
.~_... _. _..
. . ... _ .
_ _. __. _.. _ ,---. _ ..._._.. ,
... ._..
..Anahe~rri~ CA 92980 .....:............
LOCATION: 1137 South Clarence Street
_.
CEQA STATUS:
Cafifomia Environmental Quality Act Categorical Exemption,. Class 1 .
HEARING DATE: November 14, 2002
OPPOSITION: No one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal, and
no correspondence was received in opposition.
REQUEST: Waivers ofi the following to construct a family room addition to the rear of an existing
single-family residence in the RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone:
(a) Sections 18.12.060.070 - IVlaximum lot coverage.
and 18.27.062.030 (35%permifted; 42.7% proposed)
....:.: (b) Sections~18.12.060.060 - Minimum reauired open space. _
- _. _ and 18.27.062.031 15.850 sg.ft. lot required for afour=bedroom house; ,
357 sa.ft. lot existing and proposed) ,
. Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced petition and a public hearing having been duly
noticed for and held on the date set fiorth above, I do hereby find:
1. That waiver (a), maximum lot coverage, is hereby approved on the basis that strict
application of the Zoning Code would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other. properties in .
- -_ -- - identical =zoning classification in the vicinity because a number of variances have been granted for similar ,... r ~ry _....._.-.-.,.. .
.proposals o0 other properties in the neighborhood, as discussed in paragraph (10) of the Staff Report to '
the Zoning Administrator dated November 14, 2002; and that due to reclassification of the underlying :. , .
residential subdivision from the R-2-5000 Zone to the RS-5000 Zone in 1972, the maximum permifted lot
coverage was reduced from 45% to 35%, thereby causing the existing lot coverage (36.9%) to become
legally nonconforming..
2: Thatwaiver (b), minimum open space, is hereby approved on the basis that the existing ~,~
property is currently non-conforming with respect to minimum open space requirements and the proposed.
. family room addition will not increase the open space requirement or further intensify the use of the
property. -
3. That, except for maximum lot coverage and minimum open space, all other development
standards of the RS-5000 Zone will be complied with, including the proposed 18-foot rear yard which. '
exceeds the minimum 5 feet required. for asingle-story dwelling.
. ..f ~. k ~-t d~~ ~a'.~.ts~»-.r?°: ~.ei„i °a4.u. ~~i~ir '- _,~e~ '~r~.-o+a r'-35..> ~k ~~. ,~ ,,., ~ r
~~ ~ ~ ku,~ ~.'`u' '~'. cz,.~" 'r ~ti.~-'~`~ -~r~S~r'ia v~ ~ 'x'; t~3r ` ~ y~ rx.. ~ t
- - -
.., - _
~_ ::
.... .
.:...
-; i _ _ -
_ `;:
r i^rt.''z,;..:a t.~~ Y '~r,-,.F}}~~~ ~ ~x- r.. .:. ~-7 „`~':
i.
. -,,, - `•. '.. .t.y is ..y+.::? -,.., t. .
k -S 1 •..
..
'~., :4
. _' .: : .'
.,... -.. 5 ,.,.. ... ^ ..
` -- That no one indicated their ptesence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; ~~ .: ~-:
'and thtit no correspondence in opposition was received ' -
. , ....
Based on the evidence "and; testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Variance No.
2002-04541, subjectto,the`following conditions:
._
1. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifcations ,
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning .
__._ ..__...._ -. ~ . _- Department marked Exhibit Nos:=l=and 2; and as conditioned herein: ~-=: - .~: - ~.- ~ =--:=-:.: ~ :.:== . _.._._.:..;:: ~..:. -: - ~ :.-
• 2. That within a period ofi one (1).year from the date of this decision; the appropriate permits shall be
• obtained from the Building Division for the proposed addition. Extensions for further time to complete
-said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 1t3.03A90 of the Anaheim MunicipaCCode.
3. That approval of-this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not inc~ude'any action ar findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. .
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this 21$c day of.November 2002:
- AnniKa M. Santalahti, Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an, appeal to the City Council, in writing, accompanied
by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 davs of the date of the signing of this decision or
- unless members of the City Council shall request to review.this decision within said 15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE 8Y MAIL: I'do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set ..
forth below, I did.deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward
a copy to the City Clerk. ,
... ... DATE: Novembec21, 2002 .. ~ -.. - . _ ..._
• Patricia Koral, Senior ord Processing Operator