1960/06/2141~8
City_Hal_l_, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- Jun_e_21, 1960~ 7:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN.. Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutteo
ABSENT : COUNCILMAN: Fry.
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: PreSton Turner.
CITY CLERK: Dens Mo~ Williams.
CITY ENGINEBR: Thornton Piersall.
ACTING CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: The Minutes of the Negular Meeting held June 14, 1960 were approved on
motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE NO. 878: Public Hearing pursuant to request
submitted by Bryan Industrial Properties (G. W. MoPherson) to pass an emergency
Ordinance rescinding Ordinance No. 878 regulating the number df entrances to South
East Street, was continued fr°m the meeting of June 7th and 14th~ 1960 to this date
to receive the Ci'ty Attorney's ruling on the matter.
Mr. Turner reported that he reviewed the files, the Minutes, and Ordinance
No. 878, and had also inspecte~d the area and noted the locations of the buildings.
He briefed the City Council on the circumstances surrounding this zoning, and read
excerpts of the Minutes of the December 8, 1953 meeting, prior to the adoption of
Resolution of Intention No~ 2304o He further explained that provisions pertaining
to the P-L Zone, the 16~ 'travelway and one entrance on East, South and Water Streets
as well as the fence barrier, were provisions in both Resolution No. 2304 and Ord-
inance No. 878.
He reported that the buildings erected on this property are set back t~
required 60-feet; that there is one driveway onto East Street, approximately in
the center of the block, half way between South and Water Streets, and if the E.
D. Johnson Company would remov.e the two fences on the north and south sides of
their lot, and place the fence in the center of the one driveway, so that traffic
coming into the property could go north or south, it would comply with the pro-
visions of the Ordinance.
He explained that th.e Council could either require that the property
owners comply with the provisions of the Code, or they could rezone the property
and change the conditions of rezoning as they wished. He thereupon recommended
that the City Council require the property owners to comply with the provisions
of this ordinance.
With reference to the Service Station constructed on the south portion
of the property, he stated that to require the street, in accordance with the
Ordinance would place the driveway between the service station building and the
first row of pumps, and that in accordance with the code, where a service station
is located in snM-1 or M-2 zone, the P-L zone is waived for that particular lot.
He recommended that the property owners be rquired to put in the landscaping, also
being a provision of the ordinance°
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Patrick Smith, 700 South East Street, advised that they questioned
the legality of the Service Station at this location, and quoted from Sections
9200 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Mr. Turner explained that when this property was zoned, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 878, Service Stations were a permitted use in mM-1 zone.
Mr. Smith then referred to Variance No. 269,requesting an additional
opening onto East Street to allow for the construction of a service station, which Var-
iance had been denied. He was of the opinion that the denial of this variance
established a precedent. He further reported that when construction of the
station was commenced, protests were made to city offices, and no attempt was
made to halt construction until the legality could be determined.
Mr. Turner explained that this was an M-1 zoned area prior to the time
the ordinance pertaining to service stations was changed, and that ordinances
cannot be retroactive.
4169
Ci__ty Hal~. Anahei.m~ Califoznia - CO_UNC~L MINUTES- June 21, 1.960, 7:00 P.M.
Discussion was held regardin~ the rights of the City Council to Change
zones generally. It was the opinion o~ the City Attorney, that a service station
was an allowable use in snM-1 zone because at the time the C-3 zone was created
the provisions of the M-1 zone had not|been changed.
Councilman Thompson recalled that it was reported that the buildings
were located so as not to obstruct the use of the 16-foot roadway.
Mr Turner stated this was t~ue, with one exception, that of a tele-
phone booth ~n the service station property.
Mr. Smith, in recalling the ~riginal hearings advised that it was
their opinion that the P-L zone was no~ created on the property specifically
for landscaping and parking, but to ac~ as a buffer zone for them, inasmuch
as they were relinquishing their naturgl barrier, that of R-3 zoning, in the
original compromise, requested the proqisions of the ordinance be carried out
in its entirety.
One suggestion was~the traff4c could turn before getting to the
service station property and either go~out on East Street or to the rear of
the service station on to South Street~ It was noted that the exact position
of the roadway was not fixed in the pr~visions of the ordinance.
Mro Turner referred to the c
and explained that it was his opinion
entrance on East Street was authorized
not been established anywhere, that it
Lot, which was the approximate locatio]
~urt decision regarding this property,
~hat the court felt that since one
under the ordinance, and since it had
might as well be fronting the 3ohnson
! he felt the Council would have selec,ted,
being approximately in the middle of t]~e block. Inasmuch as the property to
the south is also owned by Mro Johnsoni and this one driveway would serve both
his properties, he felt there was no n~ed for another opening.
Mr. Sam Eo Collins, Attorney representing Mr. Johnson, addressed the
City Council stating that if the ordin%nce is to be enforced, it should be
enforced in its entirety, giving them % way to get out on to East and South
Streets, which at the present time wou~d be a very difficult thing. Mr. Collins
explained that when Mr. Johnson purcha%ed the property there was nothing of
record indicating this easement.
/he Mayor asked if anyone else· wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearin~ closed.
Discussion resumed pertainin~ to access and improvement of Water
Street.
Councilman Chandler asked Mr$ Smith what, in his opinion, would
happen if every piece of property ther% was given an access to Hast Street.
Mr. Smith replied that, in his opinion it would cut down the
landscape area, there would be debrisa~d a depreciation of their property
va lue.
A gentlemen from the audience reiterated the steps they had taken
in an effort to check the legality of ~he service station before construction,
and stated he believed the station was built either by Mr. Coons or Mr. Coons
Company.
Councilman Coons advised that his company had built the station and
called attention to the fact that because his company had built the station,
and that there was a conflict of inter, st, he had taken no part in the discussion,
nor would he take part in the voting on the issue.
Councilman Thompson moved to,accept the .City Attorney's recommendation
and enforce said Ordinance. CouncilmaB Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
4170
C_it¥ Hall~ A:~aheim~ California -COUNCIL MINU/,~S -June 21, 1960~ 7:00 P. M.
~ ". L-- ~, .... i ' '" ~ i , .... ,
Councilman Coons ~equested the record to show that he abstained from
voting because of conflict of business. ~'
COuncilman Thompsen moved request of Bryan Industrial Properties be
denied. Councilman Chandle~ seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Coons ~equested the record to show that he abstained from
voting because of conflict Of business.
PUBLIC HEARINGz RECLAS$IFIGAIION NO. F-59-60-93: Submitted by David Hock,
requesting change of zone f~.om R-A to R-3, property located on the northwest
corner of Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue (Tract 3691).
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 258,
Series 1959-60, recommended said reclassification subject to the following
conditions:
1. Record subdivision, or
Dedicate z~5~ from the center line on Orangewood Avenue and
Haster Street (exist 20~ & 30').
1-B Prepare street improvement plans and install all improvements
in accordance with approved standard plans on file in the
office of the City Engineer on BO/H Orangewood Avenue and
Has ter $ tree t~
1-C Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on bo th Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street.
2 180 day time limit on items no. 1 or l-A, 1-B and 1-C.
The ~4ayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mro Harry Knisely, Attorney for the Applicant addressed the Council
urging the granting of the reclassification and presented plans of development
for Council approvalo
Plans were reviewed and not approved by the City Council because
they indicated two story construction.
The ~ayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
REVISF. D TF. NTATIVE NbqP, TRACT NO. 3691.. Action of the City Council was deferred
from the meeting of ~ay 24~ 1960~ at the request of Ntro Knisely, to be considered
in conjunction with the above reclassification.
The City Planning Commission approved said Tentative ~ap, subject to
the following conditions;
t. Pertinent plot and building plans to be submitted to the City Council
for review.
2o Require that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval°
3o Subject to reclassification°
4. The northerly end of the most easterly alley be made 40' instead of
30~o
Councilman Coons moved that the revised tentative map of Tract No. 3691
be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Thompson seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
4171
CitY_ Hall, Ana.hei_m, Ca.!i.forn!a- CO.UNC~L MINUTES- June 21, 1_960~ 7:00
C
RESOLUTION NO. 6089: ounciiman Coonsjoffered Resolution No. 6089 and moved
for its passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance
changing the zone as requested, subjec} to the recommendations of the City Plann-
ing Commission, and further subject to]the following stipulations:
(a) That the Applicant, or ])eveloper pay into the Park and Recreation
Fund, a sum of $25.00 p~;r dwelling unit, payable at the time
building permits are is
(b) That final action on tk
building plans have bee
approved.
Refer to Resolution Book~ pa!
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH]
THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE IS N~CESSARY IN
IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM ~dNICIPAL
CHANGE OF ZONE° ~.F-59-60-93 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing
by the following vote:
adopted,
ued.
reclassification will not be had until
submitted to the City Council and
e
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
ERTAIN AREAS OF THE CITY~ AND THAT ARTICLE
CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ACCO~LISH SAID
solution was duly passed and adopted
AYES: COUNCILMEN: ChandlE.r, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNC I LMAN: Fry. i
The Mayor declared the foreg!ing resolution No. 6089 duly passed and
PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~-59-60-103: Submitted by
Masaiki
Yoshizaki, requesting a change of zonejfrom R-A to C-1 and C-3, property
located at the southeast corner of Brogdway and Brookhurst Street.
The City Planning Commissioni pursuant to their Resolution No. 260
Series 1959-60 recommended said reclas ification subject to the following
conditions: i
1. Service station in the C~3~ to be limited to ordinary service
station, not super servi~e.
2. Dedication of 45~ from tl~e center line of Broadway (exist 30J)
and dedication of 60~ from the center line of Brookhurst (exist 30')
3. Payment of $2000 per fro~t ft. for street lighting purposes on
both streets.
4. Prepare street improvement plans and install all improvements in
accordance with approved Istandard plans on file in office of
City Engineer on both st~eetso
5. 10 feet landscaping to b9 provided for and maintained along
Broadway and 6 feet along Brookhurst Street.
6. Filing of C-1 Deed Restrictions and C-3 Deed Restrictions.
7. 90 day time limit on items No. 2, 3~ 4 and 5.
Plans from the file were presented and reviewed by the City Council
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. There being
no response declared the Hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 6090: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 6090 and moved for
its passage and adoption authorizing the preparation of Ordinance changing the
zone as requested~ subject to the conditions of the City Planning Commission,
except that, Condition No. 1~ should be amended to read~ ~that the C-3 portion
4172
City Hail, Anahei..m~Caiifor.oia - COUNCIL MINUTES- JuDe 21, 1_960, 7:00 P.M.
150 feet frontage on Brookhurst Avenue, and 125 feet of frontage on Broadway
be reclassified to a C-3 zone, to allow for Service Station purposes only, or
anyother C-t use." Further, that the entire easterly property line of the
subject site shall have a 6-foot concrete block wall, 6-foot high, and that
this approval is subject to the submission by the Applicant of a revised site
plan, revising the parking layout showing fewer street entrances than are
indicated on the presen't site plan.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RFSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE IS NECESSARY IN CS~TAIN AREAS OF THE CITY, AND THAT
ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED TO
ACCOMPLISH SAID CHANGE OF ZONE. (F-59-60-103, C-1 and C-3)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILM~N: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMFN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry,
The Mayor declared the foregoing resolution No. 6090 duly passed
and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-102: Submitted by 3acinta
Herrera~ requesting a change of zone from R-3 to C-i, property located at
1121 and 1125 Swan Street, described briefly as on the west side of Swan
Street, between Romneya Drive and Los Angeles Street, approximately 200 feet
north of Los Angeles Street~
The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to their Resolution No. 259~
Series 1959-60 recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:'
t. Development in accordance with plans presented.
2o 10 feet landscaping setback on both Swan and Homer Streets.
3o Dedication of 30 feet from the center line of Homer and Swan
Streets (exist 20 feet)
Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on
both Homer and Swan Streets°
b. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements in accordance with approved standard plans on file
in office of City Engineer on Homer Street only.
6. Removal of existing improvements and preparation of street
improvement plans and installation of all improvements in
accordance with approved standard plans on file in office of City
Engineer on Swan Street.
Filing of Deed Restriction for Business and Professional Offices
only.
8. 90-day time limit on items Nos. 3, 4, 5~ 6, and 7.
Plans and pictures from the file were presented and reviewed by the
City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Walter E. Smith, Attorney for the Applicant, stated that there
should be no problems, as the Master Plan indicates this type of use for the
property. He requested, however, that the deed restrictions be amended to
include the possible use of the building as a Court Building, or County Offices.
In answer to Mayor Schutte~s question pertaining to the acquisition of
this property for municipal parking purposes, Mr. Murdoch referred to the Chamber
4173
City Hall, A.n..a...heim, Cal.ifornia _ COUN~,!L M_iNUTES_ June__21, !960, 7,0.0 P.M.. ~_
of Commerce~s recommendation for the}!cquisition of property in this area for the
La Palina Park Stadium. /he area inc dod in a Resolution to commence proceedings
by eminent domain was read by the Ci Attorney.
~tr. Smith requested that the
from the condemnation proceedings, and
for parking.
The proposed resolution pert
read.
Mr. Smith asked if the filir
was what motivated the Council into c~
was advised that the Council only rece
to finance this project.
Ntt. Smith~ in noting the loc
lation to the area proposed for conde~
consider exempting these two lots. Ac
parking spaces would be lost by the Ci
two lots under consideration be excluded
advised that one of the lots will be used
aining to the condemnation proceedings was
g of this application for reclassification
nsidering the condemnation action. He
ntly learned that the city was in position
ation of the two lots in question in re-
nation~ asked if the City Council would
cording to his calculations only twenty
rye
Councilman Coons called attention to the fact that if this entire area
was acquired by condemnation~ the cit~would be permitted %o vacate the streets~
thereby providing additional parking.
Mr. Herrera~ Applicant~ addressed the Council advising that he had
attempted to learn the city plans for ~his area with no results~ and that now
he had entered into a Contract with Ntrto Smith.
Mr. l~ichard Glover addressed(the council in opposition to the taking
of this property by condemnation, and ~:elt the wishes of the individuals should
be taken into consideration~
Mr. Turner~ City Attorney~ e~<piained that property taken by eminent
domain is paid for at the market
Mr. Joe Lane, owner of prope.~ty in the area~ advised of his plans for
commercial development of his propertyi and urged approval of Mr. Herrera"s
application for reclassification.
Mro Charles Lusin~ law par'triter of Mr~ Smith~ addressed the council and
questioned City Attorney, Preston Turner on certa~.n points of law pertaining to
eminent domain proceedings. ':
At the conclusion of this di$¢ussion~ Mayor Schutte declared the
Hearing closed° ..
Councilman Thompson moved that action on this reclassification applicat-
ion be postponed one week (June 28~ 1960), Councilman Coons seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Chandler r~quested that the record show he didnot
voter and had disqualified himself because of conflict of interest on both issues.
Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Coons
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER R~C~SS: The Mayor called the me%tin9 to order~ all members of the City
Council w~r~ pre,eh{ w~{h the exceptio~ of Councilman ~ry, and business before
the Council continued.
PUBLIC HfARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-t04: Submitted by Forrest C. and
garie C. Greenhalgh~ requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-i~ property located
at 1702 Sumac Lane~ briefly described as the southwest corner of Sumac Lane and
~uclid Avenue°
The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to their Resolution No. 261~
Series 1959-60 recommended said reclas,,~ification be denied.
4174
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- June 21, 1960 7:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the council.
Mr. Aune, Attorney for the applicant~ addressed the council advising
that the request was made in order to allow the property %o be used as a Real
Estate Office. He called attention to the area itself as well as Euclid Avenue
and nOted the existing commercial uses in the immediate vicinity. Regrading
the parking situation~ he ~.eriously.doubted if this corner lot could damage
or increase the traffic and parking situation of the houses on down Sumac Lane,
and suggested conditions be imposed on the parking situation to the satisfaction
of everyone. He urged the granting of the reclassification and was of the
opinion that to deny it would create a residential island in an otherwise commer-
cial zone.
Those addressing the Council in opposition to the reclassification
were:
Mr. and Mrs. WelLs, owners of adjacent property to the west of subject
property, and ~Lr. Gilbert Peter who called attention to the petition of protest
filed with the City Planning Commission.
Their objections :were: Increased parking problems and traffic hazard
to the children in the area~ depreciation of property values~ and objections to
the lights and flags of the proposed business.
Mr~ Aune advised that Mr. Greenhalgh has discussed with the adjoining
property owner to the south of a possible alley between %hese two parcels of
land. If such an alley was dedicated and placed in that area, it would provide
access for parking on the south side of the property under consideration.
Mro Perez felt that the proposed alley was hearsay, and that the
purchaser was aware of the R-1 zoning when he purchased the property.
Mr. Wells stated that to put in this alley would require the purchase
of the property and a house in order to put the alley all the way through.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the Hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 6091: Councilman Coons offere~ Resolution No. 6091 and moved
for its passage and adoption denying Reclassification No. F-59-60-104.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (F-59-60-104)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYe_S: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and $chutte.
NOES: COUNCI LMHN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCI L~AN: Fry.
The Mayor declared the foregoing resolution No. 6091 duly passed and
adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING.. RFCLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-105: $ubmitted by Bernard R.
Seaman, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l, property briefly described
as located on the east side of Topanga Drive, approximately 10~ feet south of
Lincoln Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 262,
Series 1959-60 recommended said reclassification be denied.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the council.
Mr. Raymond Ribal, Civil Engineer, representing the Applicant addressed
the Council relating the uses presently in the immediate area. He stated that
due to the development in the immedia%e vicinity~ and the nuisances created
4175
City Ha!l, Anaheim, California - COUNqIL MINUTES- June 21, 196.0, 7:00 P.M.
thereby, makes the use of this proper~y for residential purposes untenable. He
also called attention to the fact tha~ no protests to this request were made to the
City Planning Commission. Regarding ~raffi¢, he felt the traffic generated from
this development would be negligible,~and as far as intrusion. into a residential
area, he felt the intrusion had already been made.
The Mayor asked if anyone el
being no response, declared the Hearin
RESOLUTION NO. 6092: Councilman ChanC
for its passage and adoption, authori2
reclassifying the property, as request
se wished to address the council, there
g closed.
let offered Resolution No. 6092 and moved
ins the preparation of necessary Ordinance
ed, subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of 10-feet f~om center line of the alley.
2. Dedication of 32-feet flora the center line of Topanga Drive~
3. /he payment of $2.00 pe~ front foot for street lighting on opanga
Drive.
4. Preparation of street i~provement plans, and installation of all
improvements in accordance with approved standard plans on file in
the office of City Fngi~e~ er.
~lock wail en the easterly boun_.dary line Of
5.
Installation
of
6-foot
the property,and installation of 6'foot block wall on the southerly
boundary line of the pro~ert~ concurrent with
development
of
the
property. !
6. 90-day time limit on the above.
Refer to Resolution Book, pa
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH
THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE IS NECESSARY IN
IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM N~JNICIPAI
CHANGE OF ZONE. (F-59-60-105, C-l)
~e
~- CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DEIERMINING
3ERTAIN AR]~AS OF THF CITY, AND THAT ARTICLE
CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ACCOMPLISH SAID
On roll call the foregoing RWsolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote: i
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Fry.
The Mayor declared the foregping Resolution No. 6092 duly passed and
adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. [-59-60-106: Submitted by Mel Scharnweber
requesting change of zone from R-A to E-1 and R-3, property located at 1851-1875
Haster Street, and briefly described ag located on the west side of Haster Street
approximately 605 feet south of KatellA Avenue.
The City Planning Commissioni, pursuant to their Resolution No. 2637
Series 1959-60 recon~endod ~aid reclas~i~icatlon, subject 40:
1. Record Subdivision map~ Or
1-A. Dedicate 45 feet oh Haster Street (exist 30 feet), or
1-B. Prepare street improvement plans and install all improvements
in accordance with approved standard plans on file in office
of City Bngineer, or
1-C. Payment of $2.00 p~r front foot for street lighting purposes.
2. Filing of R-3 and C-1 Deed Restrictions.
3. 180-day time limit on items Nos. 1, or l-C, and 2.
Letter of appeal filed by Mri Clarence Meddock, partner of Satellite
Mobile Homes Estates, and petition of protests filed by tenants of the Satellite
Mobile Homes Estates, were submitted.
4176
City..Hall, An____aheim,..Cai!_foWnia- CoUNCIL.__MINU_TE$'- _June 2!, 196__0, 7:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
A gentleman representing 'the Riveria and Satellite Mobile Homes
Estates requested that the use of the property be kept comparable to their
use of the land.
Sarah McComb, 1844 Haster Street, speaking on behalf of the residents
of the Satellite Mobile Homes Estates~ and the person who circulated the petit-
ion of protests, requested that the area be kept residential and advised that
there were no objections to the R-3 request.
Mr. Jack FE. nnegan, representing the applicant, addressed the council~
explaining a brochure of the overall plan of development. Exhibit No. 1, being
the first phase of development~ the plot plan of the northeasterly section
of the development° Exhibit No. 2, the proposed floor plan of the shops,
Exhibit No. 3, the ..~.'endering of the first phase of development. Exhibit No.
4 being the complete master plan of total development, representing over one
million dollars. Exhibit No. 5~ the rendering of the second phase. Exhibit
No. 6, the floor plans of 'the proposed apartments~ and exhibit No. 7~ the
rendering of the proposed apartments~
The brochure and plans were reviewed by the City Council.
Letter of protest filed by Mr~ Louis M. Rubin of the Riviera Mobilhome
Park and also petition of tenants of said Park were submitted and read.
Councilman Thompson stated, although he did not doubt the sincerity
of those protesting, he felt that if this development were already there, it
would not have precluded the development o£ the trailer park. He could see
a reasonable objection to the two story apartments because of the invasion of
privacy o£ the residents in the mobile home park.
Miss McComb re£erred to the investments made in the mobile homes~
and the taxes paid by them to the City of Anaheim.
The Mayor asked if anyone had anything new to offer, there being no
response declared the Hearing closed.
Councilman Thompson offered a resolution that the application be
granted~ as requested~ with the stipulation that the R-3 development be limited
to single story construction.
vote:
On roli call the foregoing resolution failed to carry by the following
AYES.. COUNCI LM~_N.. Thompson.
N055; COUNCILMFN; Chandler, Coons and Schutte~
ABSENt: COUNCILMAN: Fry.
The Mayor announced that the Resolution failed to carry.
Councilman Coons moved that action by the City Council be deferred one
week (June 28, 1960) to allow Mr. Finnegan an opportunity to confer with his
client to de!ermine i£ he ~ould be agreeable to R-3 zoning only in the area.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 76: Submitted by the City of Anaheim, requesting per-
mission to establish a county operated trash transfer station on property
presently zoned M-2, located on the North side of Julianna Street approximately
310 feet east of Olive Street.
VARIANCE NO. 1258: Submitted by Robert L. Clark, requesting permission to
establish a county operated trash transfer station on property presently zoned
M-I, located approximately 355 feet west of Raymond Street at Romneya Drive.
/he City Clerk reported that appeals have been filed on action taken
by the City Planning CommiSsion on Special Use Permit No. 76 and Variance No.
1258~ at their meeting hel~ June 20, 1960, and that public hearings on the
two applications have been scheduled July 5, 1960~ 7:00 P.M.
4177
~ity.Hall, A_na_heim, Cali_f__ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES -.. June.21; 1960, 7_:00 p._~.__
At the request of Mr. Koch, ~range County Surveyor and Road Commissioner,
Councilman Coons moved that the date o~ Public Hearing on both Variance No. 1258
and Special Use Permit No. 76 be changgd from 3uly 5, 1960 to 3uly 19, 1960,
7:00 o"clock P. M., Councilman Chandle~ seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ·
SIGN APPLICATION: T. 3. WINTER: Appl
permission to erect one il-foot high,
West Center Street was submitted.
Ntt. Joe White, Manager, advi
an existing sign at 715 West Center St
view.
Lcation submitted by T. 3. Winter for
Jouble faced, free standing sign at 707
~ed that the request was made because of
ceet that hides their business from public
Councilman Thompson moved that action by the City Council be deferred
one week (3une 28, 1960) for further i~vestigation~ Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MO/ION CARRIEDo
SIGN APPLIC~IION~ GI~NERAL lIRE CO. g~pt. ication submitted by General Tire Co.
for permission to erect one ~6-foot hi~h, double faced, free standing lighted
sign at 1008 North Los Angeles Street .~as submitted°
Plans of the sign wore reviewed by the City Council, and on motion by
Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Thompson, action by the City Council
was deferred one week (3une 28, 1960) tfor further investigation. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION: WARREN HODGI~S: Apl~ication submitted by g/arren Hedges to
erect one 7-foot sign~ free standing '~'~' type sign at 922 East Center Street
was submittedo .
Mr. Hartley of Har%ley Rea% Estate office was present and explained
the plans for the sign.
The City Counci. 1 ctisapproveC~ of the type of sign planned and suggested
Mr. Hedges redesign the sign~ 'thereupon said request, as submitted, was denied
by the City Council on motion by Counc~ilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Coons. MOTION CARRI ~-D.
SIGN APPLICATION: HEINZ MOTOR CO.- ~pplication submitted by Heinz Motor Co.
for permission to erect one 32-foo~ h~gh, free standing, double faced lighted
sign at 336 South Los Angeles Street Was considered.
Plans of the proposed sign were reviewed by the City Council,noting
the 4-foot overhang of the existing r~ght-of-way.
Councilman Thompson moved s~id sign application be approved. Council-
man Chandler seconded the motion. MOT/ON CARRIED.
-
REVISRD SIGN APPLICATION: CHARIERHOU~E: Revised plans of sign to be located
at 1700 South Harbor Boulevard, previously approved by the City Council, in-
creasing the height of the sign and a~ding three smaller signs was submitted,
plans reviewed and approved by the City Council on motion by Councilman Thompson,
seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
RSCLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-55: Req~e.st of James L. Davis for six months
extension of time to comply with prov!s~ons of Resolution No. 5691 was sub-
mitted and granted on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman
Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-29: Req.~est of Kirk-Utterback Realty Company for
Council approval of revised plans in accordance with Condition No. 4 of Ordinance
No. 1480 was submitted~
Said revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and approved on
motion by Councilman Coons, seconded bY Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1239: Submi~tted by AltoD Jo and Gloria So Sharkey, requesting
a waiver of the minimum front yard setback requirements to allow for the en-
croachment of a block wall within 6-f~et of the front property line at 535
Concord Place.
4t78
City ~Ha.!l,_ _Anaheim., ca_li~grp~a - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 2!, 1_960, 7:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler reported that since the last meeting he had
again inspected the area of 535 Concord Place and noted that there were un-
usual circumstances there~ He saw no other pools in the area and felt it
was obvious from the number of pe'ople Mro Sharkey had with him at the last
meeting that a great many neighbors used this yard, at least to some extent~
for recreational purposes, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 6093 amend-
ing Resolution No. 6072 allowing for a ten foot encroachment into the front
yard, provided that the entire area from the garage, around the pool be en-
closed with a 6-foot block fence; the front part of the block fence to be
landscaped.
Councilman Chandler stated that this should in no way establish a
precedence in the city, that the encroachment is granted in an attempt to
remedy a hardship situation'
Refer to ResolutiOn Book, page
RESOLUTION NO. 6093:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 6072 PERTAINING TO VARIANCE NO. 1239.
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6093 duly passed and adopted.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 56: Request of J. R. Jacobsen of McDaniel Engineering
Co. for six months extension of time to comply with Special Use Permit No.
56 was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Council-
man Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUESTS: SOUTHWEST ANAHEIM LITTLE LEAGUE: Request of Mr. Charles E.
Samuel for waiver of provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to
the time limit established for applying for fireworks stand permit was sub-
mitted and granted on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman
Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST: WATER SERVICE: Petition from residents on Knott Avenue requesting
city water service was ordered deferred to the next meeting (June 28, 1960)
in order to allow for the completion of investigation being made on motion
by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
REFUND: Request of Anaheim Realty Inc for refund of $50.00 filing fee was
submitted and on the recommendations o~ the Building Department, authorized
on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST: USE OF CITY FACILITIES: Request of John Rivenburg, President,
Senior Youth Fellowship~ SeYenth-Day AdventistChurch, for permission to use
city facilities for a "Story Hour Program" was held over from the meeting
of June 14, 1960 for further investigation.
~r. ~urdoch reported on the investigation made regarding the lea~e
of the property and also the requested use o£ the property,
Councilman Chandler stated that inasmuch as there is some question,
at least, about endangering the lease of the property involved, and also because
it is getting close to the Council getting into a religious project, thereupon
moved said request be denied. Councilman Coons seconded the motion. MOTION
C ARRI ED.
RESOLUTION NO. 6095: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6095 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
4179
City Hal..1.., Anahei_m___C_a_lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES- June 21, 1960, 7:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y COUNCIL OF TI
ING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO
/HE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ATCHISON,
REFERENCE TO THE INSTALLATION OF FLA$
CROSSING OF THE SANTA FE TRACK.
{E CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ-
eS MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETW~-EN
TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, WITH
tING LIGHT SIGNALS AT THE SANTA ANA STREET
i
call
the
foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chand
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resoluti.
RESOLUTION NO. 6096: Councilman Coon..
its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, p~
.er, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
No. 6095 duly passed and adopted.
offered Resolution No. 6096 and moved for
:ge
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
POSAL FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCA:
HIGHWAYS CODE. (Engineering costs)
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Thompson and $chutte.
NOFS: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
[E CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET PRO-
'ED UNDER SECTION 2107.5 OF THE STREETS AND
The Mayor declared ResolutiOn No. 6096 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6097: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6097 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, p~ge_ .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI/Y COUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES. (Bernard R. Seaman)!
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote;
AYES; COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES.. COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSP-NT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution No. 6097 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6098; Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6098 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAH~.IM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD
AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Harry ~. Roman)
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution, was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYF. S: COUNCILMEN: Chandlier, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABS F. NT: COUNC I LM£N: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6098 duly passed and adopted.
4180
City Hall, Anahei_m~ Ca.lifo.~nia - COUN_C_IL MINU_TES-_Ju..ne 21, _1960;. 7:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 6099: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6099 and
moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR
STREET WIDENING PURPOSES. (North American Aviation, Inc.)
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCI L~EN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCI lJ~EN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6099 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6100: CounCilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6100 and
moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR
ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (The Southern California District of the
Lutheran Church)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6100 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6101: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6101 and
moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book~ page _
A R~.SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO TH5 CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR
ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Disneyland Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following votE:
AYES.. COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOF. S: COUNCI LMF-N: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6101 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6102: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 6102 and
moved ~o~ i~ pa~§~go an~
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING
RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS THE CORONADO STREET
ANNEXATION: DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE
ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY
PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY SO PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED
MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD
NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public Hearing August 2, 1960)
4181
City Hal__l, _A_naheim~_Califo.rn~..i.a -CouNcI..L MINUTES- Ju..9.e 21~ 1960,.7:00_P._M_.
On roll. call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. I
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN.. Fry.
The Mayor declared ResolutiOn No. 6102 duly passed and adopted.
/
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: Cancellation of City Taxes on property acquired
by the County of Orange for flood control
purposes, as listed below, was
authorized on motion by Councilman Co~ns, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRI ED: |
Project No. E2-301 and 301.1
Project No. E2-301.2 Carbon
Project No. F2-302 Carbon Cz
Project No. B1-718 Carbon C1
TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Transfer of $35,35
and Interest Redemption Fund to cover
authorized as follows, on motion by Cc
man Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
City Park Improvement
City Hall Building
Joint Outfall Sewer
1951 Sewer Improvement
1955 Improvement Bonds
TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Transfer of amount
fiscal year from Traffic Safety, In L~
Gas Tax Improvement and Parksites, Pla
General Fund for reimbursement of amcu
the fiscal year was authorized on mot~
Councilman $¢hutte~ MOTION CARRIED.
Carbon Creek
Creek
eek
eek
5.00 from the General Fund to the Bond
principal and interest payments was
uncilman Thompson, seconded by Council-
Interest $ 187.50
Interest 75. O0
Interest 300. O0
Interest 5,500.00
Interest 29,312.50
s to be determined at the closeof the
eu, Parking Meter, Recreation, Special
ygrounds and Recreation Funds to the
.nts advanced by the General Fund during
on by Councilman Thompson, seconded by
PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGE - ANAHEIM-BUSNA PARK: Orange County Boundary Commiss-
ion Report dated June 13, 1960 finding the proposed boundary change between
the City of Anaheim and the City of B~ena Park (amended resubmission) to be
reasonably definite and certain was r~ceived and ordered filed on motion by
Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIHD.
CORRESPONDENC5: Correspondence not requiring vote of the Council was ordered
received on motion by Councilman Coon~, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRI ED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1483: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1483 for final
reading and moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING ARTICLE III, CHAPTER 2 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING S~CTION 3297 THEREOF, AND AMENDING ARTICLE
IV, CHAPTER 2, PART 3, SECTION 4231 (~)OF SAID CODE. (Speed limit on Orange
Avenue, and changing a word) i
After hearing read in full ~he title of Ordinance No. 1483 and having
knowledge o£ the con~en~s therein~ Co~.ncilman Coons moved ~he reading in £ull
o£ said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the mo~ion. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roi1 call the foregoing Ordinance No. 1483 was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1483 duly passed and adopted.
4182
c_!t_~ H..a. 1_1, Ana_heim Califorqi. a - COUNC!.L .M. INUTES- June 2!,.. 1960~ .7:~00 P..,.M:..
ORDINANCE NO. 1484: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1484 for final
reading and moved for its Passage and adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1433 IN RE~ZLASS-
IFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. F-58-59-112.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1484 and
having knowledge of the co'tents therein, Councilman Coons moved the read-
ing in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinace was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1484 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1485: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1485 for final
reading and moved for its p.sssage and adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THF~ CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE VIII, CHAPTER 5,
SEISTIONS 8500.18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Clerk to set date of
Public Hearing)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1485 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1485 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1486: Councilman Thompson offered Ordinance No. 1486 for
final reading and moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 1,
SECTION 9100.2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS. ( Subdivision )
After hearing rea~ in full the title of Ordinance No. 1486 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILM£N: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOELS: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Fry.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1486 duly passed and adopted.
4183
Ci_ty Hall, Anaheim, Ca~l'_zfornia -_ COUNCIl_L.- MINU_TES- June 21, 196.0 ,_7 .. 0 .0 P....~..._.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-59-60-42: Ord,~nance pertaining to reclassification ordered
held over for the checking of lot numbers against Final Tract Map No. 3552, on
motion by Councilman Chandler, secondgd by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT CORRESPONDENCE: Statement of San Diego County Water
Authority - comments on Capital charggs for northern water for member agencies
of the M.W.D. and statement from M.W.~. regarding annexations to the district
were submitted.
30IN/ OUTFALL SEWF_R: Ntt. Murdoch pre~ent 3oint Outfall Sewer Resolution re-
commending that the Board of Director~ of Sanitation District No. 3 should re-
scind the resolution providing for connection of areas outside the city or
Sanitation District.
SANTA ANA FREEWAY- LANDSCAPING: Mr.lMurdoch advised that the landscaping
project has been budgeted by the Stat9 in the 1960-61 budget and would pro-
bably be started in October of this y~ar.
INJURIOUS MATERIALS: Mr. Murdoch reported that the chemical Chloropicrin was
now included in the list of injurious~materials according to the State Depart-
ment of Agriculture.
PROPOSED MASTER PLAN OF HIGHWAYS: A
Master Plan of Highways was reviewed
the conclusion thereof, Councilman
commend to the County of Orange that
with a modified section to provide
~ap of South Street, as proposed in the
~nd discussed by the City Council. At
~utte moved that the City Council re-
;outh Street be a secondary highway,
four lanes of traffice within a 64-foot
right-of-way° Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice by ~range County Board of Supervisors was
given of a Hearing to be held in the~hambers of the Board of Supervisors in
the Court House~ Santa Aha Wednesday~ June 29, 1960, 11:00 A.M. on the
petition for dissolution o~ Waterwork~ District No. 3.
AWARD OF JOB NO. 1191: Mro Thornton Riersall, City Engineer reported on the
following bids received for the Lewis iStreet - Cerritos Avenue Sewer Improve-
ment, in Lewis Street from Cerritos A,~.enue to Katella Avenue, and in Cerritos
Avenue from approximately 1116 feet we. st of Lewis Street to Lewis Street~ as
follows and recommended the acceptanc~ of the iow bid, that of Leo Weiler
Company: :
Leo Weiler Company.
10616 Stanford Avenue
Garden Grove, Ca ii fornia
Orange County Construction Co.
1506 N. Clinton,
Santa Aha, California
].0% bid bond
$ 38 ~ 7 30 o 30.
41,464.98.
James A. Moran Construction, Inc.
1202 East Washington Ave.~
Santa Ana~ California
de Leon Construction Co.
131 Coffman Avenue.
Anaheim, California
Vukojevich & Kordich
6124 Ferguson Drive
Los Angeles 22, California
10% bid bond
$5,500 bid bond and
Cashier"s Check No.
2090197 - $300.00
41,644.29
57,416.11
bi d bond 58,483.75
RESOLUTION NO. 6094: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 6094 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO T~E LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING
4184
City Hall., Ana_h._ei_m, Califq~nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21.~ 1960; 7:00 P.;.M...
ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE-
MENT: THE LEWIS STREET- CERRITOS AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN LEWIS
STREET FROM CERRITOS AVEN]JE TO KATELLA AVENUE AND IN CERRITOS AVENUE FROM
APPROXIMATELY 1116 FEET WEST OF LEWIS STREET TO LEWIS STREET, 30B NO. 1191.
On roi1 call the foregoing Resolution No. 6094 was duly passed
and adopted by the followiing vote:
AYES: COUNCI~EN: Chandler, Coons, Thompson and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCI IgMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCI I~AN: Fry.
The Mayor dec!aried Resolution No. 6094 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURN: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn to June 22, 1960, 10:00 A.M.,
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: _ 1: 30, A o M.
City Clerk
C_it¥_Hall, Anahei_m, _Califo?nia_- _C_OUNCIL MINUTES - June 22, 19_60, 10:00 A.M.
~Ihe City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular
session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Thompson and Schutte.
ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: Coons and Fry
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
FINANCE DIRECTOR,- Beatrice M. Miller
CITY CLERK: Dene M~ Williams
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Schutte.
This being the time and place fixed for the opening o£ bids for
the $6,600,000 bonds of the City of Anaheim, California, designated
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS, ELECTION 1960, SERIES A, and numbered 1 to
6,600~ inclusive~ the following bids received pursuant to the notice of
sale were publicly opened, examined and read:
BANK OF AMERICA NoT. & ScA. - WELLS FARGO BANK AMERICAN TRUST CO. AND ASSOCIAT
San Francisco 20~ California, bid par, accrued interest to date of delivery
and a premium of $1,369.00 for bond bearing interest payable annually the
first year and semiannually thereafter at the rates of:
RA/'E YEARS
$ 990,000
$ 4,290,000
$ 1,320,000
4~% July 15, 1961 to July 15, 1963
3~% July 15~ 1964 to July 15, 1976
3°60% July 15, 1977 to July 15, 1980
Bid was accompanied by a good faith, Cashier"s Check No. 332519
dated June 15, 1960, in the amount of $198,000.00.
CALIFORNIA BANK - THE FIRST NATIONAL B~NK OF CHICAGO, Co-Managers, White,
Weld & Co. - Bo 3. Van Ingen & Co., Inc. - E. F. Hutton & Coo - L. F.
Rothschild & Co. - First National Bank in Dallas - Baxter & Company-
Braun, Bosworth & Co., Incorporated - The Illinois Company- Stern Brothers
& Co. - Taylor and Company- Foster & Marshall - Bosworth~ Sullivan &
Company, Inc. -Lucas, Fisen g Waeckerle, Inc. -J. M. Dain & Co.~ Inc. -
Dempsey-Tegeter & Co. - McDonald-Moore & Co. - J. A. Overton & Co. bid
par, and accrued interest to date of delivery and a premium of $6~600.00
for bonds bearing interest payable annually the first year and semiannually
hereafter at the rates of: