The URL can be used to link to this page

1965/06/08City Ha_ll, Anaheim, California ~ COUNCIL MINUT~-S - June 8, 1965, 1:30 · , 8694 The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Robert Mickelson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - JOB NO. 932: The City Attorney reported on Change Order No. 1~ 3ob No. 932~ the structural steel contract for the Anaheim Con- vention Center (Bethlehem Steel Co.), advising that before the final contract was awarded, it was decided to change the roof structure of the auditorium building from a fle×ible surface toa~ridged surface, which can not be attached to the structural steel trusses without their being strengthened. Although the change order could amount to as much as $10,000.00, the end result of the roof change could be a saving to the City of Anaheim of ap~oro×imately $20,000.00. On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler / moved that Change Order No. 1, 3ob No. 932, consisting of re-enforcing trusses in the auditorium building at the Convention Hall, be authorized, not to exceed $10,000o00. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held May 11 and 18, 1965, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council- man for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman $chutte seconded said motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-407: Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 65R-407 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF 3UNE 8, 1965. (Warrants No. 39644 to 39945, both inclusive, totaling $756,396.80) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kre{n NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R~407 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-69 (NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL AREA): Public hearing was continued from the meeting of May 4, 1965, for further investigation and report from the Director of Development Services, to consider proposed amendment to Resolution of Intent No. 62R-335, to include as a condition of subject reclassification the cost of planting and maintenance of parkway trees fronting industrial property in subject area (City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1541, Series 1964-65). Mr. Alan G. Orsborn reported that after extensive consideration was given to the 'proposed amendment, it is'the recommendation of the Development Services Department that the a~nendment not be adopted. 8695 City Hal. 1, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch noted that as individual development plans for parcels with{n the northeast indUstrial area are reviewed by the City, landscaping is considered at that time. The Mayor asked, if anyone wished to address the City Council, there beth9 no response, declared the public hearin9 closed. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the proposed amendment to Resolution No. 62R-335 was disapproved, in accordance with the recommendations of the Director of Development Services. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by W. C. Garrett, 3r., requesting permission to move a dwelling from 1202 Ngrth' fast Street, to be connected to a dwelling at 423 Park Way, Anaheim, California, was reviewed by the City Council together with report from the Building Division. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-408: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-408 for adoption, granting housemoving permit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO W. C. GARRETT, 3R. TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 1202 NORTH EAST STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA TO 423 PARK WAY, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-408 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Development Coordinators for Romiro and Gloria Jimenez, requesting permission to move a dwelling from 1202 East Kenwood Avenue, to 1043 Boden Drive, Anaheim, California, was reviewed by the City Council together with report from the Building Division. The Mayor asked if the applicant was pre.sent. Mr. Darrell Meyer, 2516 Oshkosh Avenue, representing the appli- cants, advised that all ordinances have been complied with, and requested approval of the application. Mrs. Helen Hausmann, 1049 Boden Drive, adjacent to the property upon which the dwelling is to be located, addressed the Council being of the opinion that the value of her home would be better upheld by new construction on the lot. She asked whether the applicants will be residing on the property, or offering the home for sale. Mr. Meyer explained their plans for completely refurbishing the house, which will increase the value thereof. He advised that the home was to be sold to and occupied by his wife's parents. Photographs on file were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Keith Lyon, representing Development Coordinators, advised that a Record of Survey was filed for a lot split on subject.property earlier this year, however the depth of the lot as shown on the map was erroneous, and should have indicated 120 feet, rather than 149+ feet. He stated they are willing to file a new map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8696 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. In answer to Council question{ng, Mr. Lyon advised that it is necessary for them to accomplish the house moving immediately, and he stated that the property will be landscaped. Mrs. Mozelle Dallas, 1428 Forrest Lane, 'was of the opinion that the house in question would require a great deal of expense to make it comparable with others in the neighborhood. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined that the council would make visual inspection of both the lot and sur- rounding area, and the house proposed to be moved thereon, during the dinner hour this evening, and that the public hearing be continued to the 7:00 P.M. session. (See page 8719.) PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-110: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for a change of zone from R-A to R-E; property briefly described as located south of the Santa Aha Canyon Road and West of Peralta Hills Drive. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1632, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification for approval, uncon- ditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City C°Unci-1 for or against the proposed reclassification. Mr. Roland F. Krueger, 181a2 Peralta Hills Drive, representing the Peralta Hills Improvement Association, advised that residents of the area have enjoyed Orange County R-E zoning on their minimum one acre estate parcels for many years, and requested that the City grant comparable zoning to insure maintenance of the present status of subject properties. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 65R-409: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-409 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-110 - R-E) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-409 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-120 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 696: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for change of zone from C-3 to C-l, and permission to operate an established service station within 75 feet of a structure in an R-A zone; property briefly described as located at the northwest corner of Harbor Boulevard and La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 163a, Series 196z~-65, recommended said reclassification for approval uncondi- tionally; and pursuant to Resolution No. 1635, Series 1964-65, granted said conditional use permit, unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the requested reclassification and conditional use permit, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 8697 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. ._ REsoLUTION NO. 65R-410: Councilman Dutton Offered Resolution No. 65R-410 for adoption, authOrizin9 preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DET£RMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~£NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-120 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-410 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-411: Counci.lman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-411 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 696, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 696. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-411 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-121 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 697: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for change of zone from C-1 and R-3 to C-l, and permission %o operate an existing service station within 75 feet of R-3 zoned property; briefly described as 959 North Harbor Boulevard. Pursuant to Resolution No. 1636, Series 1964-65, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of said reclassification, unconditionally, and pursuant to Resolution No. 1637, Series 1964-65, granted said conditional use permit, unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-412: Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 65R-412 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RE'SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-121 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: None The MaYor declared Resolution No. 65R-412 duly passed and adopted. 8698 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTIq.N NO. 65R-413: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-413 for adop{lon, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 697, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 697. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None '. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-413 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-122 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 698: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for change of zone from C-3 to C-l, and permission to operate an existing service station within 75 feet of a residential zone; property briefly described as located at 950 North Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1638, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification for approval, uncon- ditionally; and pursuant to Resolution No. 1639, Series 1964-65, granted said conditional use permit, unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-414: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-414 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-122 - C-1 ) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-414 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-415: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-415 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 698, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 698. Roll cal 1 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-415 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-94 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5844, REVISION NO. 1): The City Council at their meeting held June 1, 1965, closed public hearing on Reclassification No. 64-65-94 and continued their decision thereon to this date. Council consideration of Tentative Tract 8699 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. NO" 5844, Reoision No. 1, was also continued in conjunction with said reclassification. The City Clerk read communication dated June 7, 1965, from Edward E. Mozer, of Kemmerer Engineering Co., Inc., requesting %hat de- termination on Reclassification No. 64-65-94 and Tentative Tract No. 5844, Revision No. 1 be further continued for a period of 30 days. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Council determination on subject reclassification and tentative tract was continued to July 13, 1965, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - RODEO PERMIT: Communication dated M~ay 12, 1965, from Bruce Coker, President, Ci~'cle "C" Rodeo Inc., was submitted requesting permit to con- duct weekend rodeos during a four month period, on the west street side of property located on Katella Avenue between West and Walnut Streets. Mro Geisler was of the opinion that any permit to conduct a rodeo for more than one single special event would require issuance of a condi- tional use permit, pursuant to Section 18.64o020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code o Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Chandler noted the property involved is within the commercial-recreation area, which would be greatly congested with tourists during the time of year the use is proposed° He suggested that a general policy be drafted for the use of large undeveloped properties in the congested areas. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request for weekend rodeos was denied, and the applicant was advised to contact., the Development Services Department if it is desired to apply fOr conditional use permit to conduct said rodeos. ~.4OTION CARRIED. PROPOSED GENERAL POLICY: Mro Orsborn was of the opinion that in approxi- mately thirty days he WoUld be able to submit to the City Planning Commission and report to the City Council on a proposed policy for the advisability o£ granting permits for the use of ,~ndeveloped properties~ together with suggested time limitation thereon° The City Council concurred with the foregoing statement, the matter to be scheduled on the Council Agenda upon notification of the Director of Development Services° CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 543 - EXTENSION OF TIME.. Request of Vesper B. White, agent for the petitioners, for 180 day extension of time for street improve- ments at 1759 West Orange Avenue, as condition of Conditional Use Permit No. 543, was submi%tedo Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, the matter was deferred pending further report from the City Engineer relating to the applicant's understanding that the City of Anaheim has not completed sewer work, thus delaying street improvements. Later in the meeting, Mr~ Maddox reported that in 1964, the pro--. perry owners paid required fees, and Lhe sewer line has been ins%ailed. The applicant may have thought that this included the lateral sewer connection to the property. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, extension of time was granted a~ requested, subject to the street improve- ments being resolved between Mrs. White and the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-6~-58 AND CONDITIONAL U$£ PERMIT NO. 503 - EXYENSION OF TIME: Request of Eva S. Bielanskt, dated May 12, 1965, for 180 day extension of time for compliance with conditions of Reclassification No. 63-64-58 and Conditional Use Permit No. 503 was submitted. Council discussion was held, and it was noted that the only 8700 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. extension of time previously granted to subject applications expired in January of 1965; further, none of the conditions thereof have been met, Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that no additional extension should be granted without the necessary dedication for the widening of Crescent Avenue and bond posted to guarantee installation of street improvements (Conditions Nos. 1 and 2, Resolution of Intent No. 64R-d4). Mr. Fernand Simoneau, representing the applicants, addressed the Council advising that the dedication of street widenin9 and posting of the bond cannot be accomplished at this time as the original developer failed to carry through as planned. These requirements will be met as soon as a purchaser is found for the property. Mr. Maddox reported that subject property's frontage on the south side of Crescent Avenue is the last portion in this area which remains unimproved; improvement would aiievia~e a drainage situation. At the conclusion of the discussion, Council consideration of the requested extension of time was continued to July 6, 1965, pending the receipt of street widening dedication from the property owner, PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Abel Caballero, on behalf of $o- ciedad Progresista Mexicana Inc., for permit to conduct a public dance, June 19, 1965~ between the hours of 9:00 P.M. and 1:00 A.M.~ at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Street, was submitted and granted in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police~ on motion by Councilman button, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - TEMPORARY FIREWORKS STORAGE: Communication dated June 5, 1965, from Red Devil Fireworks Company~ was submitted for permission to maintain a . temporary storage facility for fireworks in a steel building located at 2115 East Orangewood Avenue, from June 5 through 10, 1965. Also submitted was report from the Anaheim Fire Marshal noting his inspection of the premises, and recommending the following conditions~ if said permit is granted: "This warehouse shall not be open to the public, all employees who handle fireworks shall be instructed in the hazards of the materials involved and of the processes in which they are engaged." "Smoking shall be prohibited in all portions of the building where fire- works are stored, and portable fire extinguishers shall be install, ed in accordance with the Fire Department." Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mayor Krein suggested the further requirement that there be no smoking allowed out- side the building within the confines of the fenced area. Mr. Nate Gaffman, Sales Manager for the Company, addressed the Council explaining their precautions against fire, and noted the areas on the premises where smoking will be prohibited. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, permit for temporary fireworks storage was granted, subject to the re- commendations of the Fire Marshal. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF STANTON - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Notice of public hearing before the $tan%on Planning Commission on proposed adoption of revised land use districts comprising all of said City, and schedule of meetings, was sub- mitted together with report from the Anaheim Planning Division, finding that the proposed zoning reclassifications are not incompatible with the existing development in the adjacent portion of the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Clerk was instructed to advise the Stanton City Planning Commis- sion that the City Council of the City of Anaheim concurs with the report of the Planning Division. MOTION CARRIED. 8701 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965. 1:30 P.M. ORANGE ~OUNTy -PLANNED COMMUNITy. LOCKE RANCH: Excerpt_ from the minutes of the Anaheim Planning .Commission Meeting heid June 7, 1965, was submitted pertaining to review of a revised development_ plan for the Locke Ranch, proposed planned' community; recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission s~%r~ngty encourage %0 maintain conformance with the Yorba Linda General Plan, when approving development proposals of this type, in order to provide adequate public facilities such as schools, parks and highways, and further recommending favorable consideration of subject development plan. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and ordered copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Plan- ning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ~. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5553: Proposed expansion of Orange County Use Variance Nco 5553, to establish a truck storage yard with gasoline pump islands and gasoline storage tanks in connection therewith at the north- west corner of Blue Gum and Coronado Streets. Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held June 7, 1965, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Plan- ning Commission be urged to require that the proposed expansion of the truck storage yard conform to all Site Development Standards of the City o£ Anaheim M-i, Light Industrial Zone~ as previously recommended at the time of original construction on subject property. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, the City Council concurred with the foregoing recommenda%tons~ and author- ized Mr. Robert Mickelson, Zoning Coordinator, to appear at the hearing before the County Planning Commission representing the City of Anaheim. Further, a copy of the City Planning Commission's recommendations were ordered forwarded to the County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NO. 1845: The City Manager reported on bids taken June 3, 1965, for the Construction of Underground Concrete Water Vault No. 16, Orangewood Avenue, east of Lewis Street, advising that the o~e bid received was sub- stantially in excess of the estimated cost, and it was the recommendation of ~he City Engineer that said b].d be rejected. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, bid submitted by M. L. Garten, in the amount of $4,378.00, 'Work Order No. 1845, was rejected as it exceeds the City's estimate. MOTION CARRIED. AWARD OF CONTRACT - PROJECT NO. 146-A, UNIT 7: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that award of contract for Project No. 146-A, Unit 7, be deferred, pending receipt of approval by the State of California, to be rescheduled upon notification of the City Engineer. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT PROJECTS: Councilman $chutte offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-416, 65R-417 and 65R-418 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-416.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONV£NIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIR£ THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT, TO WIT: TH5 IMPROVFJ~ENT OF EAST STREET, FROM ORANGETHORP£ AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF RIVERSIDE FREEWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 150"; APPROVING TH~- DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING TH£ CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 1, 1965, 9:00 P.M.) 8702 City Hail, Anahelm,.California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-417: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMEN/ OF ORANGETHORPE AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 981 FEET EAST OF MILLER STREET TO DOWLING AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 147; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 1, 1965, 2:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-418: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BALL ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET WEST OF KNOTT AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1340 FEET WEST OF KNOTT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 153; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 1, 1965, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kretn NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-417, 65R-418 and 65R-419, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-419 - 30B NO. 926: Upon receipt of certification of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-419 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF SEQUOIA AVENUE, FROM BROOKHURST STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET EAST OF SIESTA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 926. (Sully Miller Contracting Co.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-m19 duly passed and adopted. DEED OF EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 65R-420: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-420 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY, FROM ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, ALONG AND ACROSS CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES. (Orange County Water District) Roll call vote: 8703 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. _ AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None ._ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-420 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:50 P.M.) Cake and coffee were served in celebration of City Manager Keith Murdoch's bir%h6ay and Fire Chief Edward J. Stringer's birthday. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-421 - EMINENT DOMAIN SETTLEMENT: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 65R-421 for adoption, authorizing compromise o£ eminent domain proceedings, settlement in the amount of $8,500.00. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMPROMISE OF CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION AND DIRECTING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE CERTAIN PAYMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (La Palma Avenue street widening- Bowler) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-421 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-422: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-422 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING A REVISION IN THE CONNECTIONS TO THE ROUTE 57 FREEWAY AT ORANGEWOOD AVENUE. (Orangewood Avenue Interchange) Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-422 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-423: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-423 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN DEEDS FROM ESSEX WIRE CORPORATION AND OTHERS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A DEED TO ESSEX WIRE CORPORATION AND OTHERS. Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-423 duly passed and adopted. 8704 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 65R-424: Councilman Dutton offered ResOlution No. 65R-a24 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INIENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND EASEMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSFS AND A PORTION OF A CERTAIN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPER/Y; RESERVING A PUBLIC UTILITY OVERHANG EASEMENT OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS A PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY ; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NO/ICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing June 29, 1965, 1:30 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: 'COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-424 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM CEMETERY - WATER LINE: On behalf of the Anaheim Cemetery Board of Directors, Councilman Schutte asked, for a report on Lhe status of existing Anaheim Union Water Comi-,any line through the Cemetery. The foregoing matter was referred to the Director of Public Utilities Gordon Hoyt for investigation. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 5,000 feet - 1 inch, and 6,000 feet - 3/4 inch Copper Tubing, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of Familian Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim, California, in the amount of $5,592.08, including tax: Familian Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim Chas. A. Estey, Anaheim Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim Taylor-Jett, San Gabriel M. E. Gray, Bell Gardens Howard Supply Co., Garden Grove Park-Son, Inc., Santa Fe Springs $5,592.08 5,644.91 5,690.15 5,709.60 5,709.60 5 ~ 709.60 5,943.60 On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that the low bid of Familian Pipe g Supply Co., be accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $5,592.08. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Mr. Murdoch reported on informal bids received for the purchase of One Ton Crane, as follows, noting that the apparent low bidder made necessary revision to their bid in the amount of $599.00 bringing the California Crane above that submitted by Frontier Industrial Machinery Corporation. He recommended acceptance of the next low bid, that of Frontier Industrial Machinery Corporation in the amount of $.3,150.00 including tax: California Crane, Paramount Frontier Industrial Machinery, Los Angeles Western Hoist~ Los Angeles Crane Veyor, Los Angeles ^Cleveland Tramrail, Los Angeles Domries, Anaheim $3,160.00 3~150.00 No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid On the recommendations of the City Manager and Purchasing Department, Councilman Pebley moved that the bid of Frontier Industrial Machinery Corporation, in the amount of $3,150.00 including tax, be accepted as the actual low bid. Councilman Du%ton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 8705 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. CLAIMS AGAINST-THE CITY: The fOllowing claims against the City were denied and referred to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a, Claim submitted by Curtis W. Warner for damages purportedly resulting from a broken street light globe, on April 10, 1965. b. Claim filed on behalf of Herman L. and Muriel Lenz for damages to real property purportedly resulting from abnormal surface water flow during the month of April, 1965. MOTION CARRIED. LART$ AGREEMENT: Council consideration of Los Angeles Regional Transportation Study (LARTS) was continued from the meetings of March 23, April 20 and May 18, 1965, pending receipt of a recommendation from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Murdoch reported that LARTS is a fact finding agency studying traffic problems relating to highways~ including rapid transit, but not related to the Rapid Transit Authority. Participants in the LARTS Program will have the advantage of a mutual exchange of materials and their analy- ration, basically on a staff level. It was noted by Mr. Murdoch that the City might be required to make available normally accumulated information, which would be included in the regional analysis and study. In turn, the State Division o£ Highways would use the findings thereof in their calculations concerning highways and freeways. Mr. George Strachan~ Secretary of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, advised that after careful study of this issue by their Highway and Trans- portation Committee, it was determined that the proposed agre~ement made no difference in federal support of the program, previous finanding having been taken from the Federal Road Funds, with future financing to be on the same basis. Therefor, it was the recommendation of the Board of Directors that the City of Anaheim participate in the program in order to have a voice in any findings and recommendations which may be made. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-425: Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-425 for adoption, authorizing the participation of the City of Anaheim in the LARTS Program. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RATIFYING THAT CERIAIN AGRKEMENI DAIED AUGUSI 2~, 196~ BE'YV~KFN THE COUNIIES OF LOS ANGELES, ORANGE, SAN BERNARDINO, RIVERSIDE AND VEN/URA~ THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.HIGHWAY IRANSPORTATION AGENCY, AND RATIFYING CITIES, WITH REFERENCE TO A CONTINUING COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCFSS IN IH5 "LARTS" AREA. Roll call vote: "i AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-425 duly passed and adopted. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AGREEMENT (SCAG): Communication dated May 28, 1965, from the SCAG Formation Committee, 3ay Michael, Temporary Secretary, was submitted together with copies of proposed SCAG agreement~ proposed by-laws and summary sheet concerning the creation and proposed functions of the association. Mr. Murdoch advised that the association would be concerned with the use and interpretation of data collected by other agencies for special- ized purposes, coordination of regional planning of area-wide facilities for various functions and facilities, and area-wide coordination of the regulation of regional problems, all to be accomplished on a cooperative, 8706 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. voluntary basis. He thereupon introduced Mr. 3ay Michael, formerly in charge of the Los Angeles Office, League of California Cities, and now City Manager, City of Claremont. Mr. Michael advised that the SCAG will be a non-profit govern- mental organization, wholly controlled by its members, who will consist of representatives of the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura and Imperial, together with the 141 cities within these counties and may at any time withdraw their membership by majority vote of their City Council or County Board of Supervisors. Mr. Michael further advised that the Formation Committee which formulated the by-laws of SCAG was comprised of representatives from the si× counties and several of the cities involved. He noted the positive purposes of the association, and advised that ultimately the functions of the LAR/S which involves only transportation should eventually be incorporated into the SCAG. Membership would be on a half cent per capita basis or $750.00 annually for Anaheim. Regarding federal aid to the undertaking of such an association, Mr. Michael advised that the City Council of the City of Claremont did not accommodate the federal aid aspects of SCAG, however, they approved the agreement, feeling that the positive purposes to be served and a means of self protection by the association were worthwhile. In answer to Mayor Krein's question, Mr. Michael reported that the by-laws of the Association clearly circumscribe functions of the SCAG to deal with regional problems, and there should be no conflict with the League of California Cities and any other organizations. Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the danger of such an association lies in the fact that to be effective, it would neces- sarily become mandatory to belong, in order to accomplish the purposes, and could be the first step to Metropolitan Government. Mr. Michael stated that could be the fact on a "District" approach, however as the association would be wholly controlled by its members, he was doubtful that members from the various localities would vote for such a measure. Councilman Chandler questioned whether or not this would be preventing State or District control, or promoting it, and asked what areas of planning would the association be concerned. Mr. Michael advised that this question would be 'determined by the membership. Mr. Murdoch read from the summary sheet, proposed regional planning areas, as follows: (a) Transportation - streets and local highways, transit; (b) Major sewer and outfall facilities; (c) Water Supply; (d) Disaster facilities; (e) Recreation facilities; (f) Open space; (g) Refuse disposal. Councilman Schutte asked what the association could do for the City that we can not do for ourselves, and who formulated the concept originally. Mr. Michael replied that the Southern Counties Regional Super- visors Association established a County Committee which presented a set of proposed by-laws to a City Committee, who in turn re-drafted the by-laws for sufficient City control, and presented it back to the County 8707 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES'- June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Committee who accepted the re-drafted bY-laws. He was of the opinion that the association would be a means of coordinating and organizing ideas and opinions from the various cities and counties, towards the prevention of undesirable events. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, final determination on the proposed City of Anaheim participation in the $CAG was continued to June 29, 1965, for further study of materials submitted. The City Council extended their appreciation to Mr. Michael for his presentation. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler: a. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application of Aero Space Coach Lines, Inc., a corporation, for authority to issue stock or evidence of indebtedness, and for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT - $B 81: The City Manager read report from the City Engineer on Senate Bill No. 81, Proposed Relinquishment of Certain State Highways, advising that letter from Assemblyman William Dannemeyer has been received stating that the bill will be amended to provide that Lincoln Avenue will not be removed from the State Highway System until such time as the Riverside Freeway is completed between Lakewood Boulevard in Long Beach and the Santa Aha Freeway (estimated approximately 1968). The report further stated that Mr. Legarra of the Division of Highways advised that State College Boulevard will be amended out of the bill, and therefor will re- main in the State System. RESOLUTION NO., 65R-426 - AB 2487: On report and recommendations of the City Manager and City Engineer, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-426 for adoption, setting forth opposition of the City of Anaheim to proposed publication of contracts per diem wage scale, Assembly Bill No. 2487. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2487. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-426 duly passed and adopted. SENATE BILL 727: Proposed legislation to allow a legislative body to expend a sum not %o exceed five percent of the money accrued to the general fund in the fiscal year for music and promotion, however not applicable to any moneys derived from room occupancy tax. .. On the recommendations of the City Manager and Finance Director, it was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley that a letter in support of $B 727 be forwarded to the appropriate legislators. MOTION CARRIED. PRESENTATION - PETITION OPPOSING FEDERAL URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM: Mr. James H. Townsend, 808 North Pine Street, Anaheim, presented petition containing approximately 300 signatures of interested citizens, as a token of other copies of said petition currently in the field, opposing Urban Renewal in the City of Anaheim under the federal program. He advised that work on the 8708 City Hall, Anaheim, Ca'lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8. 1965, 1:30 P.M. petitions was stopped as result of Councilman Dutton's motion that the City Council go on record as having no intention of requesting federal funds for Urban Renewal development in the City of Anaheim. (Page 8647 meeting of May 11, 1965.) Mr. Townsend thereupon read his letter requesting the petitions be made a part of the record indicating this Stand regarding use of federal funds for Urban Renewal. Councilman Chandler moved that the record show that petitions against the use of federal funds for Urban Renewal in the City of ~/~naheim was presented, Containing approximately 300 signatures of citizens ~f the City, and that the City Clerk be authorized to return said peti£ions to Mr. Townsend. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2150: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2150 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-100 - R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2150 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2151: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2151 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-53 - C-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMAN: Krein Mayor Pro Tem Pebley declared Ordinance No. 2151 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2152: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2152 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-92 - C-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMAN: Krein Mayor Pro Tern Pebley declared Ordinance No. 2152 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2155: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2155 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAING TO ZONING. (64-65-77 - C-l) 8709 Citv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2156: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2156 for first readin9. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-112 - R-A) ORDINANCE NO. 2157: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2157 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-95 - C-l) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Louis Edward Bennett and Max Meyer Gross for New On-Sale Beer license for un-named business, east side of Dale Avenue approximately 200 feet south of Ball Road (C-O zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte the City Attorney was authorized to file protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis of incorrect zoning. MOII ON CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Council action on application for New On-Sale Beer license at Fancy Cue, Inc., 332 East Lincoln Avenue, was deferred to this date to allow investigation of Conditional Use Permit No. 474 which granted existing use of the property, and to determine if sale of beer would be in conflict with the use as granted. Mr. Murdoch reported on review of the Anaheim Planning Commission Minutes of September 16, 1963, pertaining to Conditional Use Permit No. 474, wherein was noted that the petitioner intended to serve beer. No further action was taken by the City Council. SCOREBOARD PROPOSAL - ANAHEIM STADIUM: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis read from the minutes of the Anaheim Stadium Commission meeting held June 3, 1965, recommending that the scoreboard proposal of the American In- formation Corporation, alternate 4, be accepted by the City Council. Further, that the City Manager, Stadium Manager and the City Attorney be authorized to enter into negotiation with the American Information Corpora- tion for the completion of a contract. Mr. Davis advised it was the opinion of the Stadium Commission that the negotiation should include the possibility of some greater degree of sophistication for flexibility of the board itself, it being suggested that the lower two thirds thereof should be the minimum portion used for the message panel. He noted that the board, as proposed, will be sixty feet across the top and fifty feet across the bottom, and probable placement will be in the left field area of the ball park. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Chandler noted that the Del Webb Corporation, as the construction contractor for the Stadium, was requested to do the construction of the scoreboard by all but one of the firms submitting scoreboard proposals. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that the proposals submitted by American Information Corporation be approved in concept, and that the City Manager, Stadium.Manager and City Attorney be authorized to negotiate with American Information Corporation along this line, with possible improvement in the use of alpha numerics. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC PROJECT FINANCING: Councilman Dutton's motion that the City Council go on record stating they will not use "lease back" "no , or n-profit corpora- tion" financing for unusual expenditures, specifically non-revenue type facilities such as a city hall, music hall or auditorium, was deferred from the meetings of May 11 and 25, 1965, the City Attorney being instructed to draft a motion along the expression made into legal terminology for further Council consideration. 8710 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Krein stated he had read the motion as drafted, and at his request, further consideration of said motion was continued one week for further information. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED· (5:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: S chutte. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler· CIIY CLERK: Den, M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY £NGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Robert Mlcketson. INVOCATION: Reverend H. A. McPheeters, of the Anaheim Counseling Service gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION - YOUTH OPPORTUNITY MONTH: The month of June, 1965, was pro- claimed as Youth Opportunity Month by Mayor Krein. Said proclamation was read in full by the City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 694 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 56-57-33: Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council, and public hearing scheduled to consider application for Conditional Use Permit No. 694, submitted by 3ames D..~cAnena for permission to establish a walk-up restaurant on property presently zoned C-i, and briefly described as located at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Lynrose Drive (a private road), and also to consider amendment to Condition No. 1 of Ordinance No. 1223 pertaining to Reclassification No. 56-57-33. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1601, Series 1964-65, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 694 subject to the following conditions: · e . . · e · . That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Beach Boulevard, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Beach Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Beach Boulevard, for tree plant~ ing purposes. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked 5xhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets prior to final building inspection. That an irrevocable deed of easement be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder for the private road known as Lynrose 8711 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965. 1:30 P.M. Drive, to provide access for the multiple family development to the east of subject property, prior to final building inspection. 10. That a modified cul-de-sac, with curb break, shall be constructed on the commercial property northerly of subject property, as stipulated by the petitioner. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 26, 1965, recommended Condition No. 1 of Ordinance No. 1223 be amended to provide a modified cul-de-sac with curb break at the north property line adjacent to the frontage road presently existing on the east side of Beach Boulevard. Mr. Mickelson reported that review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council, as a question arose regarding Condition No. 9 of City Planning Commission's Resolution No. 1601 requiring an irrevocable easement for Lynrose Drive, and explained that this requirement was to guarantee right of access for the apartment development east of subject property. He further reported that the City Engineer advises that the street in its present condition, does not conform with City standards. Regarding recommended amendment to Condition No. 1 of Ordinance No. 1223, Mr. Mickelson explained that the original reclassification (56-57-33) encompassing the entire parcel of property, required a service road adjacent to Beach Boulevard, and since that time the State has abandoned plans for a frontage road; the modified cul-de-sac at the north boundary is recommended so that property south thereof reserved for service road can be put to commercial use. Discussion was held by the City Council and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that a survey of the R-1 properties to the north should be made to determine their wishes concerning abandonment of the frontage road adjacent to their properties. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-427: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-~27 for adop%ion~ granting Conditional Use Permit No. 694 in accordance with City Planning Commission recommendations. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 694. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-427 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2158: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2158 for first reading, amending Condition No. 1 of Ordinance No. 1223 %o read: "That a modified cul-de-sac, with curb break, be required on the north property line adjacent to the frontage road presently existing on the east side.of Beach Boulevard. Said cul-de-sac to be subject to the approval of the City Engineer." AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1223 IN RE- CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 56-57-33~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-111, VARIANCE NO. 1697, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 58 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 20: Application for reclassification and variance, submitted by William D. Procopio, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l, and variance to waive required landscaping in front setback to permit conversion of single family residence for pro- fessional use (dental office); property briefly described as located on 8712 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M, __ the east side of Euclid..Street, north of Alomar Avenue (624 South Euclid Street)'.. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1612-A, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. 1613, Series 1964-65, denied Variance No. 1697. Dis- approval of Area Development Plan No. 20 and proposed General Plan Amendment No. 58 was also recommended by the City Planning Commission in accordance with Resolution Nos. 1614 and 1615, Series 1964-65. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and existing zoning and uses in the immediate vicinity. Area Development Plan No. 20 was posted on the east wail of the Council Chambers, and Exhibits A, B and C explained. Mr. Mickelson advised that the main concern was a secondary access should the property be reclassified for commercial use. He further explained the problems involved which resulted in no recommended change in the alley situation. Proposed General Plan Amendment No. 58 was posted on the west wall of the Council Chambers and projected commercial'office use southerly to Ball Road noted. In summarizing the study and hearing held by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Mickelson reported that the C-O zone was also considered however the general consensus was that it would not be appropriate in- asmuch as the C-O zone was primarily developed to encourage high-rise structures in the downtown area, and would not lend itself to individual lot development. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, advised that the request is for a particular use and involves one dentist and two female assistants, which certainly could not be considered other than a light commercial use. Further, the consensus seemed to be that sooner or later this area will be commercial but not at this time. Mr. Knisely reported on residential rental experience of owners of properties fronting Euclid Street, and stated that it was commonly agreed that this was no longer a residential street. In his Opinion, the improvement and use proposed will enhance the area. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. Joseph Bradley, 707 Alvy Street, addressed the Council referring to portions of staff report prepared by Ronald L. Thompson concerning Area Development Plan No. 20. He advised of his objections to the C-1 classification and reported on the anticipated increase use of the alley which would be within six feet of a bedroom window of his home. Mr. Bradley thereon presented the petition of protest to said reclassification and supporting certain aspects of the staff support above referred to, containing 67 signatures. He further advised that if the Area Development Plan is considered, it be establish for the area between Ball Road and Broadway. Mr. Charles Murphy, 630 Alvy Street, addressed the Council in opposition advising that C-1 zoning, restricted or unrestricted, will establish a precedent for the entire Euclid Street frontage, and because of the size of the lot, sufficient parking could not be available. Mr. James C. Harris, 709 Alvy Street, indicated his opposition to subject applications for the reasons previously noted by the two former speakers. 8713 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Knisely, in rebuttal,'advised that according to the petition submitted, apparently everyone on Euclid Street favors reclassification~ and everyone removed from Euclid~Street objects to reclassification. He further advised that the use proposed is a restricted commercial use, and most compatible to the residential use. Mr. Knisely was of the opinion that the alley previously referred to could be blocked at the north, as one of the property owners on Euclid Street has agreed to grant an easement through their property providing for alley extension to Euclid Street. Mr. Dale Hammerschmidt, 626 Alvy Street, questioned the necessity of future commercial zoning on Euclid Street. Mr. Charles Murphy doubted sufficient area between two houses to extend the alley to Euclid Street, and should this be accomplished, called attention to the traffic problem that would be created. Eleanor Giblin, 1616 South Euclid Street, addressed the Council favoring subject application, and was of the opinion that the installation of a traffic light at Orange Avenue or Alomar Avenue would be the answer to the traffic problem; further, parking could be accomplished if curb breaks were permitted providing for parking in the driveways. Miss Giblin reported that a commercial zoning has been constructed on the lot next to her property and if the property is approved for pro- fessional use, she would be able to transfer her accounting business from Los Angeles to this area~ Mrs. Thelma Harris, 706 South Euclid Street, addressed the Council favorin9 said reclassification, advising that Euclid Street is no longer a residential street and relating her experience in endeavoring to rent her property· The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council either for or against subject applications, there being no response, de- clared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, recognition was given to the problems of both the residents located on arterial highways, as well as residential areas one street removed, in an effort to find a compromise to both situations~ that is, relief to those fronting highways and protec- tion to those in adjacent residential areas. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-428: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-428 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C-O, subject to the following conditions: · . · · . That the owner (s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Euclid Street, for street w~.idening purposes. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Euclid Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. That the conversion of the existing building for commercial usage shall conform to the requirements of the City of Anaheim Building Code. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-111 - C-O) Roll call vote: 8714 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-428 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-429: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-429 for adoption denying Variance No. 1697. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1697. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte · The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 65R-429 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-430: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-430 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment NCo 58, Exhibit A. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN A~ENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS A~ENDMENT NO. 58. (Exhibit "A"). Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor decl. ared Resolution No. 65R-430 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-43i: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-431 for adoption, apprOving Area Development plan No. 90, Exhibits B and C. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 20 EXHiBilS "B" AND "C". Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: $chutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-431 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-119: Submitted by John F. and Mary R. Kirsch, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-l; property briefly described as approximately 14 acres located on the south side of South Street (a small portion fronting South Street - 2236 East South Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1626, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification subject ~o the following conditions: . . That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. 8715 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of the property and advised that an R-1 tract (Tract No. 5611, Revision No. 4) has been approved subject to R-1 zoning, and this action is to comply with the subdivision requirement. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-432: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-432 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as re- quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF 'THE ANAHEIM MUNiCiPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-119 - R- 1 ) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 65R-432 duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-123: Submitted by James and Anna Morris requesting change of zone from R-A %o C-l; property briefly des- cribed as located on the south side of Orange Avenue, approximately 230 feet east of Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1621, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: , . . . That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orange Avenue, for street lighting purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orange Avenue, for tree planting purposes. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, mark ed Exhibit No. 1. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of the property and advised that the surrounding property is presently zoned C-1 and this action was brought to complete the zoning in the area. Mr. Larry Klang, 13366 Red Hill Avenue, Tustin, California, representing the applicant, reported that the small parcel 40 feet by 130 feet would be incorporated in the development (Albertson's Market) for ingress and egress to the parking area. The Mayor asked if anyone opposed said reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-433: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-433 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book~, 8716 , City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-123 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schu%te The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-433 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-124. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 700 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 57: Submitted by Frank K. Krogman, re- questing change of zone from R-A to C-1 and permission to establish a convalescent hospital with waiver of maximum building height and screen planting; property briefly described as located at the southwest corner of Wagner Avenue and Sunkist Street, containing approximately 2.618 acres. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1627, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification be denied, and in accordance with Resolutions Nos. 1628 and 1629, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 700 and recommended General Plan Amendment No. 57 be disapproved. Mr. Mickelson, with the aid of sectional zoning maps, noted the location of subject property and zoning and use in the immediate vlclni ry. He briefly reported on pass zoning applications affecting subject property and summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Com- mission. Correspondence dated June 5, 1965, from Mr. Krogman, was sub- mitred and read noting a breakdown of cost for an R-1 subdivision and advising that said cost would be prohibitive compared to the sale price. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Krogman addressed the Council and advised that his letter expressed his position, however he had been informed that the City Planning Commission might favorably consider a C-P zone (Commercial- Professional)o He further stated that his property was adjacent to a school site, and in his opinion unsuitable for residential use because of the traffic and the noise. The Mayor asked for a show of hands of those present in opposi- tion to said reclassification and use. Nearly the entire audience responded. Thereupon the Mayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-434: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-434 denying Reclassification No. 64-65-124. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (64-65-124) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-434 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-435: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-435 denying Conditional Use Permit No. 700. Refer to Resolution Book. 8717 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8. 1965. 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 700. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-435 duly passed and adopted, On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, General Plan Amendment No. 57 was disapproved. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the Council present with the exception of Councilman Schutte. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-125: Submitted by Thomas R, Coughlin, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-3; property briefly described as located at the southwest corner of Harbor Boulevard and Wilkin Way (Reclassification No. 63-64-103 and Variance No. 1628). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1624, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1. 3. --That elevations of the proposed buildings be subject to the approval of the Development Review Committee, prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of the property, and zoning and use in the immediate area. In summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Mickelson reported that the property was originally projected for an office building. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, advised that the same tenant (Firestone) would occupy the automotive service center and the proposed mall coffee shop is a national chain. Discussion was held concerning the possible use of a metal building, and Mr. Thomas R. Coughlin, 405-A West Katella Avenue, advised that plan submitted incorporated a steel type building for the coffee shop as their trademark is advertised by the building itself. Further, at this time, plans have not been finalized and it was possible that the proposed coffee shop tenant will approve a block type structure. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Further discussion was held concerning use of m~tal buildings, and Mr. Murdoch reported that the City did not have any prohibition against steel buildings, however, the policy of the City Council several years ago, was completely against steel buildings, which were then generally the cor- rugated sheet steel or sheet iron galvanized building that since that time many improvements have been made in the metal building, and if the archi- tectural characteristics and aesthetic quality were comparable,~or consistent with non-steel buildings, their use has been approved. 8718 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. REsoLUTION NO. 65R-436: councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-436 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City PIanning Commission~ eliminating Condition No. 2 thereof, and amending Condition No. 3 to read: "Pians of deveioDment to be submitted to and approved by the City Council prlor to the issuance of a building permit". Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-125 - C-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler 'and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-436 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-437'- RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-103; Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-437, amending Resolution No. 64R-596 by amending description contained therein to eliminate Parcel B. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-596 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-103. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN.. Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-437 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-126. VARIANCE NO. 1703 AND. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 56: Submitted by Union Bank, requesting, change of zone from R-1 to C-1 and waiver of the following: 1) minimum setback abutting R-1 zoned property, 2) maximum structure height within 150 feet of R-1 zoned property. (722 South Knott Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1618, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution Nos. 1619 and 1620, denied Variance No. 1703 and recommended General Plan Amendment No. 56 disapproved. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property advising that the lot in question was on the east side of Knott Avenue, adjacent to the Orange County Flood Control Channel. He reported on the zoning and use in the immediate vicinity, and summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the petitioner wished to address the Council. Mr. Gordon Kemmick, 111 West 17th Street, Santa Ana, California, representing Union Bank and Mr. Alvarez, advised of their flexibility as %o the addition to the building, and that the basic request is for re- sidential use of a portion of the property, the balance to be used for a beauty shop. He further reported the difficulties encountered by owners of properties fronting Knott Avenue in applying for a loan or renting their properties for residential use. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. 8719 City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. _. Mr. Bill Pierce, 3429 Rome Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition calling attention to the cul-de-sac alley at the rear. He noted existing beauty shops in the immediate area and advised that should the reclassification be granted, a precedent would be established that could extend south incorporating the residences facing Rome Place. Re- ference was also made to petition of protest filed with the City Planning Commission. Plans of development were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing, closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-438: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-438 denying Reclassification No. 64-65-126. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT B5 GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (64-65-126) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-438 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-439: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-439 denying Variance No. 1703. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1703. - Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-439 duly passed and adopted. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 56: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, General Plan Amendment No. 56 was disapproved. MOTION CARRIED.- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by . . Development Coordinators for Romiro and Gloria Jimenez, for permission to move a dwelling from 1202 East Kenwood Avenue, to 1043 Boden Drive, Anaheim, was continued from the afternoon session for visual inspection by the City Council of the dwelling to be moved and surrounding area involved. Mr. Darrell Meyer, addressed the Council again advising that in his .opinion the house presently on Kenwood Avenue was comparable with the neighborhood to which it will be moved. Further, he had contacted Mr. Beckman owner of the property south of subject property and was advised that he had no objections. Concerning repairs to the house, Mr. Meyer advised that the house will be completely color coated, the trim painted, the roof repaired and a concrete driveway installed, all in accordance with City requirements. Mr. Ray Dallas, 1428 Forest Lane, addressed the Council question- ing the moving of a dwelling in an area were there has been only new con- struction. He asked if this was to be a profit venture, and would 'it 8720 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965. 1:30 P.M. dePr~cigte'the value of the surrounding property. He advised of his concern regarding landscaping, and asked-what evidence was submitted to insure the repair of the house as stipulated. He requested, should the permit be granted, that the roof be repaired with large rock rather than small, and that the outer colorcoat not be a patch job, and that the house be completely painted both inside and out, and that a time limit be established to accomplish these repairs. Mr. Dallas was informed that the basic concern of the City Council was whether or not the house to be moved in was comparable with those in the area; the interior decoration or whether the applicant's parents lived in the home, was no concern of the Council. Mrs. Helen Hausmann, 1049 Boden Drive, advised that she has reviewed the plans and noted that the garage was to be located in the front, and requested it be relocated so that it would not be viewed from their livingroom windows. The Mayor asked if anyone else had any new evidence to submit', there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-440: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-440 granting housemoving permit as requested, subject to the following con- ditions: ® That the exterior of the house be stucco colorcoated and the trim painted. That the roof be repaired with additional white rock. That installation of driveway be in accordance with code requirements. Said permit to be subject to the approval by the City Engineer of a lot split prior to final building inspection. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO DEVELOPMENT COORDINATORS TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 1202 EAST KENWOOD AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA TO 1043 BODEN DRIVE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. (Romiro and Gloria 3imenez) Roi1 ceil vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-440 duly passed and adopted. ONE-WAY TRAFFIC - LF~ON STREET AND ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: Councilman Chandler requested a study be made of the possibility of establishing Lemon Street and Anaheim Boulevard as one-way streets, and that the people involved be contacted to determine if any problem would be anticipated; also, that the Urban Renewal Committee be requested to consider such a study. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - ILA JONES: The following resolution of condolence was unanimously adopted by the City Council: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING CONDOLENCE TO 30E TOMLINSON 3ONES. WHEREAS, word of the untimely death of Ila M. 3ones came as a shock to the City Council and the entire offical family of the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, Ila M. Jones has endeared herself to ali who have had the pleasure of enjoying her friendly smile, her quiet and effi- cient manner, and her wonderful sense of humor; and 8721 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 8, 1965, 1:30 P.M. WHEREAS, the City Family and the staff of the Anaheim Bulletin will feel the loss of this vital and pleasant woman who brightened the business day for us; and WHEREAS, we are keenly aware of the inadequancy of the written or spoken word to express our feelings of loss and sympathy; and WHEREAS, our hand of friendship goes out to Joe Tomlinson Jones, beloved husband ~f Ila, and to their children, Kathryn, 3acqueline and Kurt in their time of grief, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that it extends sincere sympathy and condolence; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be spread upon the minutes of the City Council and a copy thereof sent to Ila's husband and children. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was unanimously approved and adopted this 8th day of June, 1965. /s/ Fred T. Krein MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM /s/ Calvin L. Pebley COUNCILMAN ATTEST: /s/ Jack C. Dutton C OU NC I LM AN /s/ Dene M. Williams. CITY CLERK, CITY OF ANAHEIM /s/ A. J. Schutte COUNC I LMAN /s/ Odra L. Chandler COUNC I LMAN ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebtey moved to adjourn, Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 10:15 P.M. ' x C.t l r City Hal~, Anaheim, ~ti%'~a - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 15, 1965. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Robert Mickelson. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissner. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebl. ey, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held May 25 and June 1, 1965, were approved. MOTION CARRIED.