1965/07/2087'~2
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 13, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Davis advised that in accordance with previously stated
preferences of the Council relative to advertising, the basic philosophy
maintained in the negotiations has been a maximum of three permanent
advertisers on the scoreboard, with the prime position reserved for the
major advertiser.
Arrangements were made for Mr. Davis to meet with the Cifiy.
Council on an individual basis to clarify information concerning the
negotiations with potential advertisers, and details of the scoreboard
and advertising contract.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Council action was con-
tinued one week (July 20, 1965), 'pending further information.
REQUEST - INDEPENDENT BANK OF ANAHEIM: Pursuant to request by the Independent
Bank of Anaheim to consider their organization as a depositary for demand
funds from the City of Anaheim, Mr. Murdoch briefed report dated June 23,
1965, from the City's Finance Director relative to the active bank
accounts of the City.
In response to Mayor Krein's question, Mr. Geisler advised
that the accounts referred to in said report are general accounts; that
there are two individual trust accounts in local banks, one for Anaheim
Stadium, the other for the Convention Center, both being administered
by trustees, and can not be transferred. He noted that the general
accounts do have a minimum balance, and if the number of accounts were
increased, ~he minimum balance required on a new account would be an
amount on which no interest would accrue.
Councilman Dutton suggested that the existing general accounts
be rotated between the banks.
(Councilman Chandler left the meeting, a:45 P.M.)
Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof,
it was determined that copies of the Finance Director's report be
furnished each Councilman, and that any action on the request by the
Independent Bank of Anaheim be deferred one week (July 20, 1965).
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 4: 47.
City Clerk
City"Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council o'f the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEn: Pebley, Schutte and Krein.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler.
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. MurdoCh'
CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Get sler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: ~obert Mickelson.
STADIUM AND CONVENTION MANAGER: Thomas F. Liegler.
TRAFFIC EN~IN_E_ER! E~w~rd Granzow.
Mayo~ ~_r~iB ~~d ~h~'~'~.~ ~O order.
MI~TES: MigU~ ~f ~h~ Anaheim ~y ~oun~:~l ~~n~ held July 6, 1965, were
approv~ On ~{0. by O~u.~{%m~. P~i~y, [~.~,fl ~y Councilman Schu'tte.
MOTION
8793
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
WAIVER'OF-READING. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: CounCilma~-Schutte'moVed'to
waiy¢ the readin~ {n full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that
consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen,
unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council-
man for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 707: .... Submitted bY. Flor'
iene $andersfeld:_request':ing--permis§ion to establish a restaurant with on-
sale beer; C-1 property located at the southwest corner of Knott and Orange
Avenues (3465-A Orange Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1653,
Series 1964-65, denied said conditional use permit. ..
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by J. Lane Tilson, Agent for the Applicant, and Public Hearth9 was
scheduled July 6, 1965, and continued to this date at the request of'~'.the
petitioner.
Mayor Krein asked if the applicant or her agent was present and
wished to address the City Council.
Mr. J. Lane Tilson, Attorney representin9 the petitioner,
addressed the Council calling attention to findings set forth in the
Planning Commission's resolution denying subject application, and added
comments thereto, as follows:
Finding No. 2: "That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is pro-
posed to be located."
Mr. Tilson noted that the subject parcel lis located in an "L"
shaped shopping center, on property surrounded by. multiple-family dwellings
and other neigborhood commercial use. Included in the shopping center is
a package liquor store, and there is an existing beer-bar located 3 tenths
of a mile to the south. In his opinion, the proposed on-sale of beer would
not be novel Or detrimental to the area.
Finding No. 3: "Thai the plans of development Submitted iindicate~in, adequate
kitchen facilities to qualify as a restaurant orP"hofbrau and it is con-
sidered to' be a "beer-bar".
Mr, Tilson advised that /he proposed restaurant will feature a
"broil your own steak" dinner and will also serve short Orders with hot
and cold sandwiches, etc. He felt the kitchen facilities would be more
than adequate, and it was estimated that 40 percent of the gross revenues
would be from /he' sale of food, which would constitute a restaurant opera-
.tion.
Councilman Pebley called attention to the existing Junior High
School to the west o~ Orange Avenue, and the High School to the east, and
asked whether' the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board would issue a permit
for on-sale beer in this proximitY, to. thee schools.
·
Mr. Tilson advised that /he permit was tentatively approved
prior to their public hearing before the City Planning Commission, and
that no protests were filed with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
Council discussion was held, and it was noted that Conditional
Use Permit No. 604, applied for by the applicant in September of 1964,
requesting establishment o~f a hofbrau tavern on subject property, was denied.
Mr. Tilson advised that the requested hofbrau establishment was
principly a beer-bar, however the current, prop0sal hasi..been-'-taken'out. ~.?'
of that category by the addition,.of kitChen~-facilities. -F'ur~her,'~he
restaurant location is at the corner of the building, and not readily
visible from either of the two streets.
8794
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30 P,M.
Plans and the file wSre reviewed by the City Council. Council-
man Pebley noted that when ~he C-1 zoning was approved, the' Parent-
Teachers Association and church groups and the nearby residents were
assured the City Council was not in favor of a beer-bar being established
in the shopping center. -
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to the requested Conditional Use Permit, there being no
response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-539: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-539
for adoption, upholding the action taken by the City Planning Commission,
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 707.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 707.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley., Schotte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-539 duly passed and adopted.
SIGN REQUEST- 133 NORTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD: Application for sign permit,
submitted by Charles Lico for Lico's Italian Food, was reviewed by the
Council together with plans, and reports from the Building and Planning
Division, o£ the Development Servi.cos.DeDartment.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
said sign permit was granted, as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-65 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of 3ames Emmi,
dated June 29, 1965, was submitted for 1Q-month extension of time'to
Reclassification No. 64-65-65 for compliance with certain conditions,
pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-30.
At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, Councilman
Pebley moved that 19 months extension of time be granted, subject to
comp~ i an ce ,wi.th.. Co_nditi.on No', l'"Within~' th:i r'ty2 da~sn fr~m ~hl.i ~ .d~'t~e~ . Counc il
Co~ncilman-"SChu~tt'e seconded.'~ the m'otlion-'; MOT~If)N' CA-RRIED.-~ ~
ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Duane H. and Barbara 3. Hess for
entertainment permit at Duane;'s Pi':ra~eoCavern, :10~31 NorSh E-ucli'd,.Street, was
submitted and granted for a period of one year~ subject to the recom-
mendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Schutte,
seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER: Request of Jack E. Bray, on behalf of R. B. Huey Company, for waiver of sidewalk requirements on the west side of Baxter Street,
360 feet south of Via Burton to 699 feet south of Via Burton, was submitted.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Schutte moved that temporary sidewalk waiver be granted, providing .that
no permanent planting or permanent type improvements' be permitted 'within'
the area reserved for future sidewalk. Councilman Pebley seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-40 (TRACT NO. 3635)..'..:Request of Martha Holt, on
behalf of the owner of property located at the southwest corner of
Romneya and West Streets, for removal .Of..deed'restrictions recorded
pursuant to Condition of Reclassification No. %9-60-40, was submitted
together with reports from the City Zoning DiVision.
8795
City Hall. Apahetm. California - COUNCIL MINU.,TES - July' .20, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
........... Zgntng--coordtnato~ Rober~ 'Mickelson ~epo~ted that ~he prop~rty
ts.developed wtth-fourplex apartments, and tn his opinion, %he removal o~
deed restrlct~ons was desired because of the Architectural Review Committee
established by sa~d restrictions.. ~
.
Mr. Geisler was of the opinion that a public hearing should be
scheduled if the City Council wishes to consider a substantial change.
Mrs. Martha Holt, 801 Bush Street, Santa Aha, reported that the
proposed purchaser of subject property has requested cancellation of escrow
proceedings unless the deed restrictions can be lifted.
The City Clerk read communication dated July 20, 1965, from the
Escrow Corporation confirming the foregoing statement.
Mrs. Holt further advised that the property was nearing foreclosure~
the single-story buildings are constructed and their removal to allow build-
ings of a greater height would be very unlikely. Further, a real hardship
will be created in selling the property if the deed restrictions remain.
Councilman Pebley moved that the City Clerk be instructed to
schedule for public hearing, at the earliest possible date, to consider
removal of deed restrictions, subject to the payment by the applicant of'a
$50.00 fee to cover partial expenses of said hearing. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-125 - DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Plans were submitted by
3ames H. Hodges for development of a portion of property located at the
southwest corner of Harbor Boulevard and Wilkin Way, pursuant to condition
of Reclassification No. 64-65-125~ and reviewed by the City Council
together with reports from the Development Services Department.
Mr. Mickelson noted that the original proposal was for all metal
buildings, however the present plan is for a concrete block building With
metal roofing.
Mr. Murdoch reported that in the past, metal buildings and
buildings with metal roofing have been separately reviewed and allowed
under certain conditions.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
plans of development were approved, as presented. MOTION CARRIED. (Plans
dated this date and signed by Mayor Kretn)
METAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION: The City Clerk was instructed to Schedule review
of the Council Policy pertaining to metal building construction in com-
mercial and industrial zones, to be held August 3~ 1965, 1:30 P.M.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-97: Property located at the southwest corner of
Sycamore and East Streets and approved by the City Council for C-1 zoning,
pursuant to Resolution of Intent No. 65R-274.
Mr. Mickelson noted that at the publis hearing before the City
Plannin9 Commisston~ discussion was held regarding the elimination of
access to Rose Street on the west, and to the alley on the south, by the
installation of a solid masonry wall along both property lines. The
petitioner verbally agreed to the installation of said walls, as re-
corded in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held March 1,
1965, Page 9512.
The City Council added to City Planning Commission recommenda-
tions the requirement for trees on the southerly boundary of subject pro-
perty to screen a loading dock, and Mr. Mickelson reported that the wall
requirements were not reflected in the City Planning Commission's resolu-
tion, and are not shown on building plans recently submitted for plan check.
Council discussion was held, and at-the conclusion thereof, Council-
man Schutte moved that a block wall be required on the south boundary of
subject property, as agreed to, together with trees on the south boundary
for screening purposes. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. "
8796
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-536, 65R-540
and 65R-541 for adopt%on.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-536: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(E. W. and Irene E. Bradley)
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-540: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (John Ford
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-541: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Adeline Thompson Fechter and Carrie B. Thompson)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-536, 65R-540 and 65R-541
~uly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman $chutte, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was .requested
to cancel County Ta×es on the following properties acquired by the City
of Anaheim for municipal purposes:
a. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-516, formerly assessed
to Union Pacific Railroad Company, deed recorded July 13, 1965, as' Document
No. 9579, in Book 7591 at Pages 546, 547 and 548, Official Records of
Orange County, California.
b. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-502, formerly assessed
to Raymond Associates, deed recorded July 13, 1965, as Document No. 9569,
in Book 7591, at Pages 521, 522 and 523, Official Records of Orange County,
California.
MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of two 3000 KVA Transformers and 1 2500 KVA Transformer, as
follows, and based .upon analysis of bidSi..received, recommended acceptance
Of'the Westinghouse Electric bid,~.~in the amount of $32,836.96, as the
lowest and best bid:
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Anaheim
Waghe~ Electric, Los Angeles
Westinghouse Electric, Los Angeles
Moloney Electric, Los Angeles
P~Tk~ & Co., Long Beach
3. G. Coffin, Los Angeles
General Electric, Los Angeles
32,229.60
32,118.32
32,836.96
35,048. O0
36,181.60
33,028.32
32,770.40
On the recommendations of the City Manager and Purchasing
Department, Councilman Pebley moved that the bid of Westinghouse Electric,
in the amount of ~.32,836.96, be accepted and purchase authorized as the
lowest and best qualified bid. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTI ON CARRIED.
8797
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965. 1:30 P.M.
PURCHASE oF-EQUiPMENT: Mr' Murdoch reported, on informal' bids. received for the
purchase of one Offset Press, as follows, and recommended acceptance of
the low bid, that of American Type Founders, Inc., in the amount of
$4,445.48 including tax:
American Type Founders, Inc., Los Angeles
Ditto, Inc., Long Beach
Addressograph Multigraph Corp., Long Beach
Itek Business Products, Los Angeles
$4,445.48
4,870.80
5,021.64
5,181.96
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman $chutte
moved that the low bid of American Type Founders, Inc., be accepted and
purchase authorized in the amount of $4,445.48. Councilman Pebley seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-542: On the recommendations of the Superintendent of Pro-
perty Maintenance, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-542 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT SEATS FOR THE LA PALMA STADIUM MAY BE PURCHASED WITHOUT
FORMAL BID.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-542 duly passed and adopted.
PROPOSED A~ENDMENTS TO ANAHEIM CITY CHARTER: Mr. George Strachan, General
Manager of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, addressed the City Council
outlining recommendation of the Chamber's Charter Study Committee to delete
Section 606 from the Anaheim City Charter~ and add a new section to be
numbered 719, and entitled "Removal of City Officers appointed by City
Council", as contained in their letter dated 3uly 19, 1965. He advised that
~hts section has been throughly discussed with the City Attorney, and the
legal wording meets wi th his approval.
Mr. Geisler advised that the proposed amendment was written in an
attempt to incorporate various suggestions.
Mr. Murdoch reported that he had reviewed .the suggested Charter
change and was of the opinion that it encompassed points raised by the City
Council and Chamber of Commerce, and was within the intent of the Charter
Committee as expressed when the Charter was drafted.
The Proposed City Charter Amendment, was ordered received for
later consideration.
CHAMBER OF CON~ERCE RECONB~ENDATIONS - R-A ORDINANCE: Mr. George Strachan re-
ported on study sessions held by the Industrial and the Zoning and Planning
Committees of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, for the purpose of analyzing
the Anaheim R-A Ordinance, No. 2036, which sets forth standards for interim
usage of open lands and for the orderly development of R-A properties. He
advised that the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors unanimously approved
resolution of said Committees, 'which requests the City Council to follow
the standards contained in Ordinance No. 2036 when considering requests
for zoning actions on R-A properties, in order to provide for compatibility
with neighboring uses of land, and for the greatest economic health of the
community. The Chamber of Commerce forwarded copy of said resolution with
their letter dated 3uly 9, 1965.
Said recommendation was ordered received and ftl.ed.
RESOLUTIQN NO. 65R-543: Counci_lm~n Peb%~ey offe~Te~ Resolution No. 65R-543 for
adoption.
Refe_~ gO .Resg~u%ion Book,
8798
City Hall. Anghetm. California. -.COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20. 1965. 1:30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING A SPECIAL
TAX FOR ~HE FREEWAY PARK HIGHWAY LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 1965-66.
Roll call vote..
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-543 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-544: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-544 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN
ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1959-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, AUGUST 1, 1965 to JULY
31, 1966~ FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE TH£ STREET
LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (Tract No. 2489)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-544 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-545: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-545
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DIRECTING THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS TO ISSUE AN INTERDEPARTMENTAL~ PURCHASE' ORDER
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM OF STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1959-1. (Work Order No. 956)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, $chutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-545 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley:
a. Financial and Operating Reports - June 1965.
b. Minutes - Anaheim Stadium Commission Meeting of July 8, 1965.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2165: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 9165 for flnal
reading. ,,
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking, portion of Atchison Street from Broadway to 150 feet north
of Broadway)
Roi1 call vote:
·
8799
.City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - ,July 20. 1965. 1.30 P.M.
AYES: CQUNCILMEN:. Pebley, $chutte and. Krein~
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton 'and Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2165 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2166: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2166 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM /~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE: RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-125 - C-3)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, $chutte and Kretn
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Kretn declared Ordinance No. 2166 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2167: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2167 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING...(64-65-110, R-E, 64-65-120-121 and
:2e, C-:)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, $chutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2167 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2168: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2168 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE' ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-108 - R-I, Tract 5409 only)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
MayOr Krein declared Ordinance No. 2168 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2169: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2169 for final
reading.
· Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-131 - C-1 )
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2169 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2170: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2170 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
8800
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20. 1965, 1:30 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-61 - R-i~ Tract No. 4239)
Roll call. vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILM.EN: Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2170 duly passed and adopted.
'ORDINANCE NO. 2171: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2171 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1.04,
SECTION 1.04.400 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE_~ RELATING TO THE
STADIUM COMMISSION. (Powers and Duties - Deletion of Convention Center
Facility)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2171 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2172: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2172 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(Hotel Way and Clementine Street - No parking, portions of)
ALCOHOLIC LICEN. SF APPLICATIONS: The following beverage license applications
were presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their informa-
tion:
a. Application submitted by Lloyd Richard and Adah Rose McCollum for
New-On-Sale General License, premises to be located at 200-204 South
Rio Vista Street (C-1 zone).
b. Application submitted by Forest L. Bygum for Person to Person Transfer
of On-Sale General License for The Sherwood'Inn, 401 South Brookhurst
Street (C-1 zone pending).
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
the City Attorney was authorized to file. conditional~ protest with;the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Board against the foregoing applications, on the basis
that C-1 zone does not allow on-sale of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED.
SCOREBOARD - ANAHEIM STADIUM: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis read copy of
Communication from American Information Corporation and Del Webb Construc-
tion (a joint venture), contractors for the scoreboard at Anaheim Stadium;
said letter noting that their proposal was based on a starting date of
July 1, 1965, with a completion date of April 1, 1966. It was requested
that the City Council grant a preliminary release, prior to the execution
of a formal contract, in order that construction materials may be ordered
and actual design of the board begun.
Mr. Murdoch advised of his meeting with Councilmen Dutton and
Chandler this date, at which time both Councilmen indicated their acceptance
of the deluxe scoreboard, in the total amount of $986,000., as reviewed at
the previous Council meeting. He further advised that negotiations with
the potential advertisers have reached a point where the City is assured
that the costs for the board will be amortized by the advertisers.
8801
City Hall. Anahei, m. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20. 1965. 1:30 P.M.
.......... Mr' Dav{s~'rePorted that he had reViewed a rough draft of the
proposed agreement with the contractors, which will be submitted to' the
City CoUncil this week for review prior to possible action 3uly 27, 1965.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
the basic design of the scoreboard for Anaheim Stadium, as modified, and
the terms of the contract, as modified pertaining to price and structure,
in the amount of $986,000., were approved by the City Council. MOTION
C ARR I ED.
ANAHEIM STADIUM FASCIA MATERIAL: _The City ~_anagerldiSplayed a sample of the
4 foot by 23 foot by 4 inch panels of exposed aggregate concrete with
quartzite chip, which will be used on the exterior of the stadium. _ .
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS - ANAHEIM STADIUM: Traffic Engineer Edward Granzow, displayed
a sample directional sign for Anaheim Stadium, and advised of plans %o
place more than one hundred such signs in approximately..fifty~si.~.idifferent
locations to direct traffic to the baseball stadium. He reported that
nearby jurisdictions have been contacted for permission to place ·
directional signing in adjacent cities, and in the County of Orange, and
that the State Division of Highways has been contacted requesting
directional signing on the freeways.
The City Council indicated their approval of the sign concept,
in accordance with the model presented.
REPORT - STADIUM AND CONVENTION MANAGER: Mr. Tom Liegler, Stadium and convention
Manager, addressed the Council ad~istng of the procedure to be followed by
his office pertaining to progress and status reports for stadium and con-
vention facility development.
RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved- to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman $chutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:52 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton (entered the meeting 7:20 P.M.), Pebley,
Schutte, Chandler (entered the meeting 7:20 P.M.s)
and Krein.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dane M. Williams.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn.
CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Robert Mickelson.
INVOCATION: Reverend A. M. Engle, of the First Baptist Church of Anaheim, gave
the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE:
Councilman Pebley led' the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 699: Submitted by Edward Lewis and
Paulina M. 3ones, requesting permission to establish a corporate complex
consisting of offices, warehousing, parts manufacture, industrial training,
and associated scientifically based automotive test and repair facility;
property located at 1105 East Katella Avenue.
Pursuant to request of Paul Hatfteld, Agent for the petitioner,
dated 3Uly 19, 1965, Councilman Pebley moved that public hearing on Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 699 be continued to August 24, 1965, 7:00 P.M.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-136 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
715: Submitted by W. R. Mudge, requesting change of zone from R-1 to R-3 and
permission to establish home for the aged in an existing residential
structure, with waiver of minimum required parking; property located at
1219 East Cypress Street.
8802
City Hall, Anaheim, California -.COUNCIL MINUTES--July 20, 1965, 1:30 P.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1679,_
Series 1964-65, recommended denial of said reclassification, and pursuant
to Resolution No. 1680~ Series 1964-65, denied said conditional use permit.
Communication dated July 17, 1965, from J A. Ponce, Authorized
Agent, requesting withdrawal of subject petitions from any further action,
was read by the City Clerk.
On motion by Councilman $chutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
request to withdraw Reclassification No. 64-65-136 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 715 was approved. MOTION GARRIBD.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 17167 Submitted by Drew Hotel Corporation,
requesting waiver of maximum free-standing sign area and maximun sign
height; property located on the east side of Euclid Street, north of
Crescent Avenue (810 North Euclid Street).
Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution
No. 1672, Series 1964-65.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by the applicants, and public hearing scheduled this date.
Because of a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Chandler
withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue.
Mr. Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject property,
and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area° He advised that
the property has been developed with a theatre, and has an existing
changeable copy marquee°
Attention was called to the findings of the City Planning Com-
mission, as contained in Resolution No. 1672, Series 1964-65.
In response to Councilman Dutton, Mr. Mickelson reported that
there are multiple family properties located approximately 400 feet from
subject property, and that no comparison of the requested sign was made
with other theatre signs; that only Code provisions were considered.
Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council,
representing the applicants°
Mr. Lomax, of Heath and Company, sign contractors, addressed
the Council advising that the requested sign is a part of an integral
design of the theatre, and will be approximately the same size as an
existing banner. He called attention to a sign at Melodyland Theatre,
which he stated is approximately twenty-five per cent larger than the
requested sign. In his opinion, the sign ordinance creates a hardship to
theatre owners, since their signs must necessarily be larger than other
businesses, because of the subject matter which is posted on the marquee
reader panels.
Mr. Sol $chalman, representing Drew Properties Corporation,
noted the distances between the sign location and nearby residential
properties, and advised that' the single family.dwellings across the
street are owned by the company, and will soon be removed to allow for
commercial development.
In answer to Councilman Dutton's question~ Mr; Lomax returned
to the microphone and advised that the proposed sign will be illuminated
in a manner normal for plastic signs.
Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to the requested variance, there being no response, declared
the hearing closed.
88O3
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1~30 P.M.
RESOLuTiON NO. 65R-546:_ Cpunc~!man Dutton was of the opinion that because
of the nature of the business requesting the sign~ subject variance was a
proper request; and he thereupon offered Resolution No. 65R-546, granting
Variance No. 1716, subject to the following conditions:
1. That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines shall be provided
as required by the Electrical Division~ Department of Public Utilities,
and the State of California G. O. 95.
·
2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a 5-foot overhang easement along the northerly, easterly and southerly
boundaries of subject property, and shall be complied with prior to
the time that the building permit is issued or within a period of 180
days from date hereof, whichever Occurs firs%~ or such further time as
the City Council may grant.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1716.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein
NOES, COUNCILMEN, None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None
ABSIAINED~ COUNCILMAN~ Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-546 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 710, Submitted by Frank and Genowefa
Hurley McDade, requesting permission to establish a real estate-accounting
office in an existing residential structure, and to permit the installation
of a lighted roof sign with waiver of maximum sign area; property located
at 1703 West Crone Avenue and/or 745 South Euclid Street.
The City Planning Commissio~ pursuant to Resolution No. 1656,
Series 1964-65~ denied said condi'cional use permit.
Review of action taken by %he City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule public
hearing.
Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. Attention was called to
Variance No. 1339, granted in 1961 by the City Council for use of the garage
on subject property as a television and radio repair shop~ which variance
included a three foot by eight foot roof sign.
Mr. Mickelson summarized the evidence submitted to and considered
by the City Planning Commission, and advised that %he Commission felt to
grant the requested combination of commercial and residential use of this
property would establish a precedent for similar requests in predominantly
residential areas.
Mayor Krein asked if %he applicant wished to address the Council.
Mrs. Genowefa McDade~ 1703 West Crone Avenue, requested favorable
consideration of the requested conditional use permit~ advising that the
proposed roof sign will be illuminated, and is the same size as the existing
television and radio repair sign. She further advised that her family
8804
City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINUTES- July 20. 1965. 1:30 P.M.
would continue~_to_ reside 9n the premises.
Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to the requested use of subject property.
Mr. David McHaffie, ]~702 Siva Avenue, addressed the Council
noting the considerable opposition to the earlier variance, No. 1339.
Further, he opposed commercial uses of residential structres, although
he had noted no~ major problems from the television and radio repair
business, with the exception of the property's appearance. He foresaw
no improvement with the requested use, due to the signs, banners and
blackboards often associated with real estate offices.
Mr. Ronald Ztttell, 1717 Siva Place, addressed the Council in
support of Mr. McHaffie's position. He stated that although he supported
the applicant's first request for variance, he was not in favor of the
roof sign nor of the resulting additional vehicles parked in the area.
Mrs. McDade expressed the opinion that the majority of the
traffic was created by the market across the street to' the south. She
noted that her'parkway has been constantly used for banners and signs
advertising homes for sale in the area, and to her knowledge there have
been no objections made,
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
There being no response, declared the hearing closed on Conditional
Use Permit No. 710.
RESOLUTION .NO. 65R-547: At the conclusion of Council discussion,
Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 65R-547 for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 710, subject to the following conditions:
.
.
e
.
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City 'of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Euclid Avenue, for street widening purposes, including a 15-
foot radius corner return.
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior
to final building inspection.
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit No. 1, provided that plans for conversion from the
residential use to a commercial use shall be submitted to and
approved by the Building Department prior to the issuance of a
building license, concerning that portion of the property which is
to have a commercial use under this conditional use permit.
That Condition No. 1, above men~iQ~ned, shall be complied with prior
to the time that the building perm~!s issued or within a period
of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
That plans and location for any sign are to be submitted to and
approved by the City Council, said sign not to exceed 24 square feet.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERBIT NO. 710.
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-547 duly passed and adopted.
8805
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUN,CIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-133:._.Submitted by_Ethel H. McCarty
requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l; property located at the south-
west corner of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard (3006 West Orange Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1673,
Series 1964-65, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 64-65-133,
subject to the following conditions:
i ·
.
3~
.
·
e
·
·
That the owners of subject property' shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Orange Avenue, including a 25-foot radius corner return, for
street widening purposes.
That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Orange Avenue and Beach
Boulevard, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and
paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be
completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance With
standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City
Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the in-
stallation of said engineering requirements.
That the owners of subject property shall pay t° the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢. per front foot along Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard,
for tree planting purposes·
That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orange Avenue and Beach Boule-
vard, for street lighting purposes·
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied
with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from
view from abuttin9 streets.
That Condition Nos. 5, 6, and 8, above mentioned, Shall be complied
with prior to final building inspection.
Mr. Robert Mlckelson noted the location of subject property and
the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission·
Plans and the files were re.viewed by the City Council, and the
Mayor asked if the applicant or her agent was present and wished to address
the City Council.
Mr. Richard Rimel, Attorney representing the applicant, .addressed
the Council advising that the applicant is in accordance with conditions
recommended by the City Planning Commission; however they request the 180
day time limit be extended to 360 days (Condition No. 7) to allow a reason-
able time to complete the easement clearances, etc.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to the reclassification, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed·
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Rfmel advised that Condition
No. i can be accomplished within the 180 days, but Conditions 2, 3 and 4,
may require a longer period of time·
RESOLUTION NO. 65R-548: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-548
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, amending Condition No. 7 to read:
That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with within
a period of 180 days from date hereof, and Conditions Nos. 2, 3 and
4, above mentioned, shall be complied wi~h within a period of 360
days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant."
8806
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20. 1965, 1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY. OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TI/nE 18 oF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL COD£ RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE A~£NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZON£S
SHOULD B£ CHANGED. (63-64-133 - C-i)
Rol1 call vote:,.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kretn
NOES: COUNCILMEN: ~None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-548 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-134-AND VARIANCE NO. 1714: Sub-
mitted by Dorothy L. Dodd, requesting change of zone from R-O to R-2 on
Portion B, and waivers of minimum required yard areas and maximum living
unit distance from a standard street on portions A and B; property located
at 1233 Pearl Street.
Denial recommended by the City Planning Commission, pursuant
to Resolutions Nos. 1674 and 1675, Series 1964-65.
Mr. Harry Knlsely, Attorney, having recently been retained by
the petltloner, requested that subject public hearing be continued.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
public hearing on Reclassification No. 64-65-134 and Variance No. 1714,
was continued to September 7, 1965, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-135, CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO.
71'3 AND GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 42: Submitted by Pallmall Properties,
Incorporated, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-I, and permission
to establish a walk-up restaurant with waiver of block wall at t-he rear
of 3-foot planting strip and required landscaping around restaurant;
property located at the northeast corner of East and Sycamore Streets.
Pursuant %o Resolution No. 1676, Series 1964-65, the City
Planning Commission recommended Reclassification No. 64-65-135 for
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City o'f Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Sycamore Street, East Street
and Glenwood Street, for street lighting purposes.
2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Sycamore Street and Glenwood
Street, for tree planting purposes.
3. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a 3-foot public easement and a 2-foot overhang easement along the
easterly boundary of subject property.
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a 15-foot radius corner returns at the intersection of sycamore
Street and Glenwood Street with East Street, for street purposes.
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be
complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or
such further time as the City Council may grant.
6. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from
view from. abutting streets, prior to final building inspection.
7. That the curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Sycamore Street,
East Street' and Glenwood Street, as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
8. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Sycamore Street and
East Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
Standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City
Engineer.
9. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of 'the Director of Public Works.
10. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
88O7
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20, 1965, 1:30 P.M. ......
· ,
ii. Tha'~ ~ubj.~c~ P~r(~perty shali~ be de.veloped substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of .Anaheim,
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 7.
12. That all air conditioning facilities-shall be properly shielded from
view from-abutting streets, prior to final building inspection.
13. That a six foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and
east property line and along the easterly 118 feet of the south pro-
perty line which shall align with the masonry wall on the east pro-
perty line of the service station on the south side of Sycamore
Avenue.
14. That Condition Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 13, above mentioned, shall
be complied with prior to final building inspection.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1677,
Series 1964-65, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 713; and pur'suant to
Resolution No. 1678, Series 1964-65, recommended disapproval of General
Plan Amendment No. 42.
The City Clerk noted that in addition to revised plans received
July 12, 1965, a new set of revised plans has been received, July 16, 1965
(copies furnished each Councilman).
Mr. Mickelson advised that the latest plans omit the walk-up
restaurant, and comply with the recommendations of the City Planning Com-
mission, pursuant to the Commission's amended resolution adopted July 19,
1965, eliminating Condition Nos. 11 and 13 from Resolution No. 1676,
Series 1964-65 (Reclassification No. 64-65-135); said resolution further
recommending ~hat no vehicular access be allowed to Glenwood Street, or
to the easterly i18 feet of Sycamore Street.
Mayor' Krein asked if the applicant's agent was present and wished
to address the City Council.
Mr. J. R. Cruse, representing Tic Toc Markets, Inc., addressed
the City Council refertng to his letter dated July 9, 1965, wherein it
was stipulated that the recommended conditions will be complied with. He
noted the deletion of the walk-up restaurant from the revised plans, and
advised that the easterly side of the property will be used for service
access to the buildings.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to C-1 zoning.
Mr. John Ahern, 1237 Glenwood Street, addressed the Council being
of the opinion that to grant C-1 zoning on subject property would constitute
spot zoning. He called attention to neighborhood commercial stores pre-
viously established to the north and south within a mile of subject pro-
perty, and noted additional C-1 land at the northeast corner of Lincoln
Avenue and East Street, which has been vacant for a number of years.
Mr. Ahem failed to see why this particular property, bordered
by a narrow residential street on the north, should be zoned commercially.
He Objected to the increase in traffic which would be generated by the
proposed neighborhood commercial development.
Mr. Dale Heyne, 1240 Glenwood Street, advised of the~many children
residing .in. the neighborhood, and~he objected".to':~the; intrusion of additional
traffic into their area dreating additionat.-hazards.
Mr Clemens Heinz, 1235 Hast Sycamore Street, advised that the re-
sidential properties are well maintained and'in~ adding his opposition to that
of the former speakers, stated that the commercial development will jeopardize
the potential re-sale value of the residential property.
In answer to Mr. Hetnz's question, identity of principals in
Pallmall Properties, Incorporated, was announced.
Mrs. R. J. Graupmann, 603 North Elmwood, addressed the Council
in opposition to the C-1 zoning, and asked whether a wall would be required
along the north boundary of the property, if the reclassification is
approved,
8808
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 20. 1965. 1:30 P.M.___
......... ir'was-~oted by. the City-COunci1 that a'comme~cial buildtJg is ,
proposed along the northerly boundary of the property, with a landscaped
setback. Mrs. Graupmann was invited to the Council Table to review
revised plans.
Mrs. Graupmann was of the opinion that from her residence~
directly across the street, the view of the rear portion of store build-
ings would be unsightly.
Members of the audience were invited forward to the Council
Table to review the plans.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8:40 P.M.)
· . -
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present.
RECLASS%FICATION NO. 64-65-135, CONDITIONAL USE PEPA4IT NO. 713, AND_
GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 42 (CONTINUED): In answer to Council questioning,
Mr. Cruse advised that he had just spoken with some residents of the area
in question, and he felt that if a 20-foot setback from East Street were
incorporated into the plans, together with a 6-foot wall along the Glenwood
Street frontage, some of the major objections would be alleviated.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that the public hearing be continued to August 3, 1965, 7:00 P.M., to
allow .incorporation of the 20-foot setback from East Street into the plot plan,
and submission of elevation plans of the north~ and.i, east"side of the proposed
buildings; decision as to the choice of landscaping or a 6-foot masonry
wall along the north boundary to be determined at that time. Councilman
Dutton seconded ~he motion. MOTION CARRIED.
oRDINANCE~NO.' 2164: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2164 for adoption.
· ·
(Said ordinance was read in full in public)
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXTENDING THE TER~ OF ORDINANCE
NO. 2018, A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, FOR A
PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS. (Interim zoning, Northeast Annexation No. 3)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Kretn
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2164 duly passed and adopted.
INVITATION - PROPOSED UNIFICATION OF LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS: Councilman Pebley
announced that a meeting will be held in the Anaheim Union High School
cafeteria Tuesday, 3uly 27, 1965, 7:30 P.M. with the Orange County Com-
mittee on School District Unification and representatives, of the Anaheim
Elementary School District Board of Education to consider proposed
unification of local school districts, and he urged all'Councilmen and
City officials to attend.
RETENTION OF THE ELECTRICAL $YSTFJ~.- POSITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL: Discussion
was held relative to the position of each'indiQidu~l Councilman on re-
taining or disposing of the City owned Electrical System. Following,
briefly summarized, is a resume of the opinions .and positions as e×pressed:
MAYOR KREIN: The citizens and tax payers are the owners of the electrical
facility. To sell would be the most foolhardy ..thing that could be' done.
I am one hundred percent for retaining 'it. '~
8809
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL M~NUTES - July 20, 1965~ 1:30 P.M.
C~Nc~-L~AN"P£BL'EY:' The City origi~ted'"{he elec'~rtcat system for our
citizens, and as a tax payer and Councilman, I am strictly for retaining
the facility.
COUNCILMAN DUTTON: I w~s elected to represent approximately 150,000 people
in this City t.o the best-of my ability. It is my considered opinion, that
I would be derelict in my duty in representing-the people if I advocated selling
something built bylthe people, benefiting the people and belonging to the
people. Had it not been.for the City owned electrical facility, instead
of a tax rate of '$1.10, it would be $1.56 per $100 assessed valuation.
FOr many reasons to lengthy to enumerate at this time, ~ am for retaining
the system.
COUNCILMAN SCHUTTE: I have never felt so strongly about a matter as I do
this particular issue. I think the electrical system should be retained.
,
If it had not been for this facility, many improvements and programs, such
as"parks and playgrounds, which are for the people, would not have been
realized without either a bond issue or raising taxes.
coUNCILMAN CHANDLER: I believe I have previously clearly expressed my
position. One of the arguments in favor of selling the facility is that
we are interfering with free enterprise, and I feel to the contrary, we
are the only ones in this field in Orange County_making this a~free
enterprise, as we are the only ones in the same business as the Edison
Company. This presents a balancing factor in rates to the benefit of the
general public, not only in Anaheim but all Orange County. I feel it would
be the gravest error and dereliction of duty on the part of the City Council
to think of placing the people of the City of Anaheim in the position of
selling what I consider to be a Twenty-Five Million Dollar business, to a
limited market of exactly One. Who would bid9 Who would pay9 Regardless
of the value, how much could it be sold for9
In conclusion, Councilman Chandler advised that it has always
been the principle of the City Council, on any issue, to invite and listen
to any citizen regarding their views on the issue. He thereupon moved that
an open special meeting be authorized to be held at any desired location
in the City, at a date and time mutually agreed to, for the purpose of
listening to everyone desiring to express their opinion and views on this
matter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RESOLUTION OF CON~ENDATION: The City Council authorized a Resolution of
Commendation to Walt Disney and his staff for his "Great Moments with Mr.
Lincoln" exhibit at Disneyland.
ANNEXATION - PLACENTIA-YORBA LINDA AREA: Mr. Fred Sorsabal was authorized to
attend the Local Agency Formation Commission Meeting July 21, 1965, 2:30
P.M., on the matter involving a moratorium on annexation activity in the
Placentta-Yorba Linda area.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 9:35 P.M.
City Clerk