1956/02/291396
City Hall, An.a.,heim, C. alifo.rni~ February 29, .1956-..2:00. P..M.
The City Council of the City Of Anaheim met in Adjourned Regular Session.
PRESENT'~ COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry~ Wisser, and Van Wagoner.
ABSENT~ COUNCI LMAN~ Schutte.
CITY ATTORNEY, PRESTON TURNER: Present.:
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KEI/H A. MURDOCH: Present.
CONS/RUCTION OF STEEL-DECK GRAND STAND, ~A PALMA PARK: Discussion was held on the
revised proposal submitted by the PittsbUrgh-Des Moines Steel Company for the con-
struction of the steel-deck grand stand ~t the La Palina Park site. Mr. Preston
Turner, City A%torney~ read a transcript of a letter from the Pittsburgh-Des Moines
Steel Company, taken by his secretary, o~ the proposed revision which read in sub-
stance as follows: (Communication not yet received by the City of Anaheim).
"Based on the large grand stand~ at a total contract price of $138,560,
we would accept payments as follow~
Payment of 60~ of $108,449 on shipment of steel from our plant.
Payment of 20~ of $108,449 on delivery of steel at grand stand
site in Anaheim, California.
Payment of 20°~ of $108,449 thirty-five days after completion
and acceptance by the City of Anaheim~ California.
$7,527.75 plus $1,505.55 interest one year from date of signed
contract;
$7,527.75 plus $1,129.17 interest two years from date of signed
contract~
$7,527.75 plus $752.79 interest three yea~s from date of signed
contract~
$7,527.75 plus $376.38 interest four years from date of signed
contract.
The above payments are to receive first priority each year from the City
of Anaheim Park and Recreation Fund. In the event of default of any due payment~
that amount~ plus tnterest~ must become first priority from the Park and Recreation
Fund following your revenue, plus the payment and interest due that year.
Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company is to retain title to the steel
grand stand until paid for in full."
The City Attorney stated that he wanted to secure further info~mation
relative to the extension o£ title provision and also to check with their attorneys
as to the approval of the new contract form as presented.
Until the communication is received and confirmation can be made
between the attorneys as to the extensio~ of title provision and the approval of
this new proposal, the matter was held over until tomorrow.
MAGNOLIA-CRESCENT ANNEXATION NO. 2~ Orange County Boundary Commission's report
dated February 20, 1956 finding and detem~ining that the boundaries of the pro-
posed Magnolia-Crescent AnnexatiOn No. 2 are reasonably definite and cer2ain was
received and ordered filed~ on motion by Councilman Van Wagoner, seconded by
Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 3165~ Councilman Wisser offered Resolution No. 3165 and moved for
its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution BOok, page~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT
OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL TO ASSIST THE CITY /~TTORNEY IN THE CASE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
VS. THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, ET AL.
1397
.City Hall, .Anaheim, iCalifornia.,. February 29, 1956 - 2~00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT
COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Wisser, and Van Wagoner.
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNCI LMAN~ Schutte.
The Mayor declared ~he foregoing resolution duly passed and adopted.
PAYMENT OF ELECTION OFFICER$~ It was moved by Councilman Fry, seconded by Council-
man Wisser thai the City of ~naheim pay City election officers (for all types of
elections called by the City) the same rate as paid by the County of Orange:
Inspectors, $15.00; all others, $12.00. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Wisser reaved to adjourn to 11~30 A.M.~ Thursday~ March 1; 1956.
Councilman Van Wagoner seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNHD.
SIGNED.
City Clerk
Ci. ty. H. all~ A. naheim~ ~California~ March 1.~ 1956- 11:30 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Adjourned Regular Session.
PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pea~son~ Fry~ $chutte, Wisser~ and Van Wagoner.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Non~.
CITY ATTORNEY~ PRES/ON TURNER: Present.
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KEITH A, MURDOCH~ Present.
CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL-DECK GR6ND $TAND~ LA PALMA PARK: Mr. Turner~ City Attorney~
advised the Council of the in~ormation he had obtained from the Bank of America
relative to ibis contract. Telegram from the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company~
signed by ~. DeKlotz, was submitted and read, revising the nexl to the last para-
graph o£ the letter dated February 28~ 1956 wherein the company would retain title
to the unpaid portion of the grand stand. Mr. Turner £urther advised %hat he
doubted whether the City could legally enter into a contract under these conditions.
Further discussion was held as to the amount of interest saved by cash
payment by the City for the construction of this project. It was determined that
approximately $4~000.00 could be saved if the City could advance the entire con-
tract price at this time and that the schools' proportionate share would be paid
back to the City wi thin the next few years.
Mr. Turner advised that there were two things the City could do on this
matter: First, they could rescind this resolution accepting the bid and reject
all bids and readvertise for new bids. Second, they could rescind this resolution
and reject the bid and find tha~t it would be to the best interest of the City to
buy on the open market.
The Administrative Officer, Keith A. Murdoch, advised that a cash payment
was available only if property to be purchased adjacent to school sites could be
purchased from the General Fund.
The Mayor asked the representative of the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel
Company if his company would be willing to go along on the contract as originally
advertised if the Bank of America would underwrite the project. The representa-
tive assured the City that the company would approve of this; however, the matter
should be determined as quickly as possible as the steel for this project had been
already scheduled.
After further discussion, the Council had to first determine if the Bank
of America could negotiate wi!h the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Company, and, if
not, then the Council should rescind their action and buy on the open market.