Loading...
1968/07/30 68-437 City Hall. Anaheim. C$lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30. 1968. 1:30 P,M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley (entered meeting 2:05 P.M.) COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph M. Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson ABSENT: PRESENT: I I Mayor pro tem Schutte called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Clark led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: Resolution of Commendation to the USO and, Bob Hope, urging public support of the "All-Star Show of USO" to be held August 10, 196,8, at Anaheim Stadium, was unanimously adopted by the City Council. MINUTES: For clarification, Mayor pro-tem Schutte asked if action taken July 9, 1968, authorizing Council Members to attend the International Association of Chiefs of Police Convention in Honolulu on October 6, 1968, also included authorization for payment of convention expenses. The Council responded in the affirmative. Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held July 9 and 16, 1968, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. ,.---. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to .waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unle.. after reading of the titl., specifie request is made by . Councilman for the ~..ding of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT,,- FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amoun.t.."..C?J_.$722, 124.17, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97 AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 37 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 101 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1029 RECLASSIFICATION, NO. 67-68-98 AND VARIANCE NO. 1989 (TEN- TATIVE TRACT NO. 6647. REVISION NO.1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97: Initiated and rev':t'.ee:~.by the City Planning Commission, to consider an amendment to the General Plan proposing a change in land use symbology from low density to low-medium and medium density, property bounded on the west by the proposed Orange Freeway, on the north by the Riverside Freeway, on the east by the Santa Ana River and Glassell Street, and on the south by Lincoln Avenue. r-, Public hearing was continued from the meeting of June 18, 1968, to be considered in conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 101 and additional applications for developments in the area. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. PC68-22l adopted July 15, 1968, recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97, as amended, in accordance with Exhibit "A", Revised. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 37: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to determine the proper circulation of the area described in General Plan Amendment No. 97. 68-439 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES- July 30, 1968~ 1:30 P.M. ,..-. "---, The principle reason for the conclusion that multiple family residential uses are appropriate for a portion of the undeveloped land is the proximity of subject area to the nearby industrial employment, and typical multiple family site design allows for a greater distartce between dwelling units and commercial use than is normally provided by single-family development. Exhibit "A" attcrn.l"ts to provide for a compatible transition in residential densities by designating low- density land uses adjacent to existing low-density development, and future low-medium densities adjacent to future medium-density land use. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO, 37: Mr. Thompson reported that the City Planning Commission recommended approval of Area Development Plan No. 37, Revised, Exhibit "A" with Alternate No.1, as being the most logical method of providing additional circulation to those properties in the study area, and that since one street would utilize a portion of the school and park property, this would seem a more logical means of providing the circulation rather than attempting condemnation proceed- ings to remove an existing R-l home in the tract immediately vest of the Santa Ana River and north of Lincoln Avenue, for north-south linkage at the time those properties to the north are developed. Exhibit "A", posted on the Council Chamber wall, was e1tplained by Mr. Thompson as an exhibit which does not indicate precise street locations, but schematically depicts a generalized street linkage system for the entire study area, identifying the classification of each street, the general area each street will serve, and the connecting streets, and including the following proposals: Arterial Streets - Designation of Frontera Street as a Secondary, 7l-foot right-of-way, access on south side only. Local Streets - 1. Establish a north-south collector, connecting Lincoln Avenue with Dutch Street, and Dutch Street with Frontera Street. 2. Establish an east-west collector, connecting with Rio Vista Street and continuing east, ultimately returning north to Frontera Street. 3. Extend Dutch Avenue west, connecting at a four-way intersection with Rio Vista Street and a future east-west street located south of Tract 6659. Mr. Thompson explained four alternative alignments, prepared for consideration in conjunction with theproposal for a north-south collector street: Alternatives 1 and 2 extending northerly from Dutch Avenue, crossing Rio Vista School and parksite property along the eastern park property line. North of the park, Alternative 1 crosses school property and continues northerly, with the entire right-of-way located east of the school property. Alternative 2 alignment also crosses the school property, continuing northerly with the centerline of the street coincident with the eastern school property line. Alternative 3 alignment was shown for reference purposes only, as future alignment would depend upon expansion of park property and patterns of future residential developments. Alternative 4 alignment parallels the east property line of the school and the northern boundary of Tract No. 4321 and would require the acquisition of a developed residential lot in said tract to provide for a residential street serving the local area. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Thompson indicated that the school board had concurred with Alternate 1; and as tract maps are filed by developers, the recommended circulation plan would be imple- mented. Mayor pro tern Schutte asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. 68-441 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - )uly 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M~. The Mayor announced that sufficient evidence from those ty present had been received, and thereupon declared the hearings clQs.~. The City Attorney explained that the adoption of the General Plan Amendment did not establish zoning, but acted as a guide in considering applications for specific developments and zoning. I I I RESOLUTION NO. 68R-45l: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-45l for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 97 as amended, Exhibit "A", as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 97. Roll Call Vote: i' AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-45l duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-452: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-452 for adoption, approving Area Development Plan No. 37, Revised, Exhibit "A"; further, that Alternate No. 3 be rejected, and that action on Alternates 1, 2 and 4 be held in abeyance for further stuay. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 37, EXHIBIT "A". r-- Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-452 duly passed and adopted. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 101: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, all proceedings on General Plan Amend- ment No. 101 were terminated as recommended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1029: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, action taken by the City Planning Commission terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 1029 was upheld. MOTION CARRIED. r--i RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-98, VARIANCE NO. 1989 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6647, REVISION NO.1: Councilman Dutton moved that public hearing on Reclassification No. 67-68-98 and Variance No. 1989 and action on Tentative Tract No. 6647 be continued to August 20, 1968, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-4 AND VARIANCE NO. 1995: Submitted' by Clark W. Wingert, et aI, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-l; also requesting waivers of minimum lot area, minimum lot width, minimum floor area per dwelling unit, and minimum required front yard, to permit 107 one-family lots; property located north and west of the northwest corne~Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l99, recommended said Reclassification be approved subject to the following conditions: I " 68-443 City Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30~ 1968~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-454 duly passed and adopted. fl TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 6659: Developer - J. W. Klug Development Co., tract located on the west side of Rio Vista Street between Lincoln Avenue and Mardi Gras, containing 107 R-I zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held July 1, 1968, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6659 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69-4 and Variance No. 1995. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by under- ground utilities. r-- 4. That the vehicular access rights to Rio Vista Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim, except at street and/or alley openings. \.. 5. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the easterly property line separat~ ing Lot No. 1 and 103 through 107 and Rio Vista Street, except that corner Lot Nos. 1 and 107 shall be stepped down to a height of thirty inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable land- scaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Follow- ing installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume th~ responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 6. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the westerly property line separating Lot Nos. 17, 18, 31, 32, 45 through 50 and 63 through 66 and the Orange Freeway. 7. That Carousel Street (Streets "E" and "F"" shall be 64 feet in width. 8. That Carousel Street (Streets "E" and "R") shall be improved with a 40-foot roadway within the 60-foot right-of-way. 9. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satisfactory to the City Engineer. r 10. That Carousel Street (Street "E") shall provide for the extension of a future street, 64 feet in width, at the easterly tract boundary. 11. That Street "A" shall be named Dutch Avenue; that Street "B" shall be named Hempstead Circle; that Street "c" shall be named Ward Terrace; that Street "D" shall be named Chantilly Street; that Streets "E" and "F" shall be named Carousel Street; that Street "G" shall be named Royal Place; and that Street "R" shall be named Plantation Place. 68-44~ City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-5 - C-3) Roll Call Vote: I I ! AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-455 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-6 AND VARIANCE NO. 1996: Submitted by E. H. Baumann requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3 and .eivers of maximum building height, minimum distance between buildings and per- mitted location of accessory buildings, to permit a 23-unit one aAd two- story apartment complex; property located on the south side of Orahge Avenue, west of the centerline of Western Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-203, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: r-' 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 57 feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Orange Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Orange Avenue, such as curbs, and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orange Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Orange Avenue, for tree plant- ing purposes. 5. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and re- creation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. I The City Planning Commission granted said variance in part, pursuant co Resolution No. PC68-Z04, approving waiver of minimum distance between buildings and permitted location of accessory buildings, and denying waiver of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single- family residential zone, subject to the following conditions: ".--, I 1. That this '\lariance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-6. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view. 5. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with pr~o~ to final building and zoning inspections. 6. That revised development plans shall include one story de- velopment within 150 feet of the R-l Zoned property to the south. 68-447 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ju1v 30, 1968~ 1:30 P.M" RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-88 AND VARIANCE NO. 1985 - CLARIFICATION: Publi~ Hearing was held July 9, 1968, approving Reclassification No. 67-68-88 (Resolution of Intent No. 68R-389) and granting Variance No. 1985 (Resolution No. 68R-390), submitted by Hillman, et aI, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and waiver of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone boundary, property located ad- jacent to the southwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue. The City Clerk briefed a letter dated July 18, 1968 from Alvin B. Baranov, owner of a parcel of property originally included in said reclassification application, requesting inclusion of his property in the zoning action. Letter dated July 24, 1968 from Western Shopping Centers, Inc., authorized agent of Mr. Baranov, was also submitted, stating no objection to inclusion of Mr. Baranov's property in subject reclassificatioR, but indicating that his property is not included in the development ~ich is planned. The City Attorney advised that the parcel owned by Mr. Baranov was withdrawn from consideration by his authorized agent prior to the City Planning Commission public hearing on June 3, 1968, therefore eould not be considered by the City Council for inclusion in said reclassifi- cation; that the applicant must reapply in order to comply with the neces- sary requirements for a zone change. Mayor Pebley asked if the owner of the property wished to address the Council. r--- Mr. Alvin Baranov, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, stated that he was unaware that his property had been withdrawn by his authorized agent; that his parcel had been included in the legal advertisement published in advance of the City Planning Commission public hearing; and asked for clarification of the description of property acted upon by the City Council July 9, 1968. The Zoning Supervisor explained that when revised plans were submitted by the developer, request was made for withdrawal of the parcel owned by Mr. Baranov; that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission as a result did not include that parcel, and it was not considered by the City Council on July 9, 1968, Following Council discussion, Mr. Baranov was advised that a new application would have to be filed, with public hearing before the City Planning Commission, prior to further Council action. C~NDITIONA~_ USE JE~JNO. .237; Previously granted to permit on-sale alcoholic beverages (Resolution No. 62R-634), property located on the west side of Euclid Street between Ball Road and Beacon Street, The Development Services Department requested termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 237, as subject property has not been developed under conditions imposed on the granting of said petition. RESO~~IO~ ~9r 68R-45~; Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-458 for adoption, terminating all proceedings on said Conditional Use Permit, as recommended by the Development Services Department. ~: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 237 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-634 NULL AND VOID. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. I -,. -I I I 68-449 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M~ - - - RESOLUTION NO. 68R-461 - WORK ORDER NOS. 5025 AND 549B: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-461 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. ,--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ODNSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, 1'0 WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN NUTWOOD STREET, CRONE AVENUE, BALL ROAD AND CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDERS NOS. 5025 AND 549-B, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened August 22, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYE S : NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-461 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 68R-462: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-462 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (68-6A; area of Haster Street and Simmons Avenue. Public Hearing August 20, 1968.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-462 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 68R-463: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No~ 68R-463 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO \7ACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (68-7A; Seelig Circle. Public Hearing August 20, 1968.) Roll Call Vote: .........-.., AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None" None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-463 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-464 - GRANT OF EASEMENT TO COUNTY OF ORANGE: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-464 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 68-411 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M~, RESOLUTION NO. 68R-46B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0' ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1965-2 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, JULY 1, 1968 TO JUNE 30, 1969, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. RESOLUTlON NO. 68R-469: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1965-3 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, JULY 1, 1968 TO JUNE 30, 1969, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-470: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1967-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, OCTOBER 1, 1968 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1969, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING Qt)NTRACT YEAR. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 68R-466 through 68R-470, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. LIFETIME SPORTS TOURNAMENT - ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Letter dated July 17, 1968, from Rodney Coulson, President, Anaheim Chamberof Commerce, was submitted requesting use of the Anaheim Municipal Golf Co'~rsa on S("~:. tem- ber 21 and 22, 1968, for the Life Time Sports, City of Anaheim Golf Tournament. On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that said request he granted under the same terms and conditions granted for the 1967 Tournament. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application No. 50363 of Southern California Edison Company to increase rates charged by it for electric service. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission - ~?p1ication No. 50366 of Greyhound Lines, Inc., to increase intrastate~.:~p~i'ssenger fares and express rates. c. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of June 20, 1968. d. Minutes - Anaheim Public, Library Board - Meeting of June 17, 1968. e. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 68-638 - Detachment of Cypress Recreation and Park District. ORDINANCE NO. 2546: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2546 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 15.16.090 THEREOF, AND BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 15.16.370, RELATING TO THE ELECTRICAL CODE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. COUNCILMEN: l~'c~Lc. COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2546 duly passed and adopted. 68-453 City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Julv 30. 1968. 1:30 P.M~o The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-47l duly passed and adopted. REQUEST FOR STREET CLOSURE: The City Manager reported on a letter received from a group of Downtown Anaheim merchants requesting permission to have Lemon Street from Lincoln to Oak closed to through traffic from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. on August 6, 1968, for the Circus of Values Sidewalk Sale, and advised that the Traffic Engineer and Chief of Police have no objection to granting said request, noting that a traffic officer may be required for a portion of that time. On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Clark moved said request be granted. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ~~~S~ER O~ F~D~J. On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that transfer of funds, not to exceed $700, be authorized from the Council Contingency Fund to Account 109-214-396, Emblems and Awards, to cover purchase of Perma Plaques for presentation to members of the Citizens Capital Improvement Committees. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SANTA ANA CANYON ANNEXATION NO.2: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Clark, communication acknowledging the flood control problems and advising that approval of development will be withheld in the areas sub- ject to flood control hazard until construction of the needed protective works, either at the developer's expense or subsequent to the availability of public funds for said work, was authorized forwarded to the Local Agency Formation Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ,...-.. PHOTOGRAPHS - CONVENTION CENTER DEDICATION: The City Manager briefed a report from the Public Information Office itemizing charges in the amount of $542 from The Photographers, as requested by Councilman Dutton at the July 16, 1968, Council meeting. On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Krein moved payment of the outstanding balance of $42.00 to The Photographers for photographs taken during Convention Center Dedication Ceremonies. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-472 - MENASHA CORPORATION - TRAFFIC CONTROL: On the recom- mendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-472 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BETWEEN R. EARL SHEEHAN, DOING BUSINESS AS ANAHEIM SECURITY PATROL AND PACIFIC DETECTIVE BUREAU AND PATROL, AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, RELATING TO THE DEPUTIZING OF GUARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIRECTING TRAFFIC ENTERING, LEAVING, AND TRAVERSING THAT PORTION OF BALL ROAD WHICH BORDERS THE MENASHA CORPORATION PROPERTY. Roll Call Vote: ",..-... AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-472 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-473: On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-473 for adoption, authorizing execution of a contract not to exceed $10,000 with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for promotional advertising, 1967-1968, as previously authorized. I" 68-45Ji City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Julv 30, 19.68, 1:30 P.M._ PRESENT: bS2ISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph M. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIRECTOR: Thomas Liegler ,--- PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-99 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 95: Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider a change in zone from R-l and R-A to C-l, property located on the west side of Euclid Street between Broadway and Orange Avenue; Area Development Plan to consider secondary access solution. " The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l84, recommended said reclassification for approval, subject to the following conditions: r 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the Oity of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Euclid Street, for street widening purposes. 2. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/Or alley openings to Euclid Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 3. That the owner of the two southerly parcels which comprise the southerly 450.77 feet of subject area shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 4. That secondary circulation shall be provided in accordance with Area Development Plan No. 95. 5. That any driveway depression and/or apron not to be used along Euclid Street shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter and side- walk, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 8. That all external lighting shall be directed downward and away from abutting parcels. 9. That any structures which are proposed for conversion from residential to commercial uses shall be brought up to the minimum standards of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Electrical Codes, as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 10. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 11. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 12. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopted as and when each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertain- ing to such parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 13. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished for each property that is not a lot of a recorded tract, prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning said property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property. "........ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. pe68-l8S, recommended said Area Development Plan be approved in accordance with Exhibit "AU, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a standard, 20-foot alley be provided and dedicated to the City, to the rear of all subject properties as they develop for com- mercial or commercial-professional uses (since a 2:1 structural setback adjacent to the single-family, residential homesites to the west would be required). 1 .. 68-4.5J City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30~ 1968, 1:30 P.M. that it could be rented only to adults because of the heavy traffic. At the request of Councilman Clark, he indicated location of his property on the map posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers. Councilman Clark agreed that the subject properties were wall suited for commercial development, and suggested that Mr. Lindstrom submit an application with specific plans for development; Mr. Lindstrom replied that he felt there would be opposition from the same people who opposed this reclassification. rl t Mr. Reedstrom indicated that he would not oppose plans for development which were compatible with the area, but would object to the idea of an alley being developed at the rear of subject properties. Mr. Lindstrom stated that he wished to develop his property on an individual basis, citing the difficulties involved in assembliftg several lots for development. Council questioned whether approval of C-l zoning would allow approval of specific plans of development; the City Attorney advised that utilization of existing residential structures would require a Cond1tlonal Use Permit; that several of the subject properties would have inadequate parking spaces, which would also require a variance. If homes were removed, however, commercial structures meeting site development standards could be built without further Council approval. Mr. Lindstrom requested clarification as to whether removal of the existing homes and development of alleys would be necessary if commercial zoning is approved. Mr. Thompson advised that homes on the northerly five lots, which includes Mr. Lindstrom's property, would have tQ be relocated in order to meet requirements for commercial use. ,........ Mr. Burl Brown, 405 South Euclid Street, asked how many of those in the audience objecting to the reclassification lived on the east'side of Falcon Street, abutting the subject property. Seven persons responded. Mrs. Virginia Edwards, 424 Falcon Street, requested and was granted permission to examine the letter containing twelve signatures in favor of the reclassification. The Mayor pro tern announced that sufficient evidence fromtthose present had been received, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-475: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-475 for adoption, disapproving Reclassification No. 67-68-99. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN i\IGZA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-99) Roll Call Vote: ,.......... AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Clark, and Schutte. Dutton. Pebley. The Mayor pro tem declared Resolution No. 68R-475 duly passed and adopted. AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 95: Councilman Clark moved that Area Development Plan No. 95 be disapproved. Councilman Krein seconded the motion; To the foregoing motion, Councilman Dutton voted "No". MOTION' CARRIED. 68-458 City Hall, An.heim) California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M. CONVENTION CENTER - ADVANCE CIRCUS DATES: Mr. Davis reported on request of Ring1ing Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., that approximate dates be held open for circus performances at the Anaheim Convention Center for the next five years, with confirmation of exact dates to be made one year in advance. On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that tentative dates for circus performances be held open as requested for the next five years, with approval of exact dates to be handled admini- stratively one year in advance. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. :--... ADJOURNMENT: motion. Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Krein seconded the ADJOURNED: 7:50 P.M. SIGNED n ~_ 'A)dL~ ~ City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 6, 1968, 1:30 P.M. The City Counc'. . of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. ~. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley (entered the meeting at 2:30 P.M.) COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson CITY CLERK: Dene M. Will : ' CITY ENGINEER: James P. }~ddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow ABSENT: PRESENT: Mayor Pro-tern Schutte called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Howard Dobbs, of the East Anaheim Christian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Clark led the Asse q)ly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. JNTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Mr. Harvey Rose, of City Personnel De- partment, introduced new employees attendi~lg the Council meeting as a part of the City's orientation program. Mayor Pro-tern Schutte welcomed the new employees to the City Family. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held July 23, 1968, were approved, on motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. ~ WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the rea(~.'ng of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 68 -456 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M. 2. That only three (3) vehicular accessways be permitted to Euclid Street, to lessen vehicular movement on this street. The locations shown on Exhibit "A" are only suggestions. Final vehicular accessway locations would require the approval of the Development Services Department and the Traffic Engineer, when the properties are initially developed for commercial or com- mercial-professional uses. If the vehicular accessways are mutually developed and the properties adjoining said accessways are developed singly or jointly, it will be necessary that a mutual agreement be recorded, by property owners involved upon initial zoning action, to guarantee final joint vehicular access (10 feet on each property). Mr. Thompson noted the location of the subject property, consisting of seven parcels fronting on Euclid Street; the northerly five presently zoned R-l and the two southerly parcels presently zoned R-A; and noted that the properties had been indicated on the General Plan for Commercial land use since 1963, and that they were recommended in the Front-On Study as having commercial potential. He indicated that adoption of Area Development Plan No. 97, in accordance with Exhibit "AIf, posted on the Council wall, would provide for secondary circulation that would serve the properties when developed for commercial land use; that it would require dedication of an additional three feet for street purposes at the time of commercial develop- ment; that removal of the existing residences on the northerly five lots would be required if parking were developed at the rear of these properties; and that it would be possible to retain the residential structures on the two southerly parcels for commercial use. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Thompson indicated that although no zoning applications had been received on the subject property, the City Planning Commission felt that if a Resolution of Intent to zone C-l were adopted by the City Council, giving property owners an indication of appropriate zoning in the subject area, processing of individual applications would then be facilitated, and orderly development encouraged. In the ensuing discussion, Councilmen Krein and Clark indicated a preference to consider individual zoning applications in lieu of approving the subject reclassification. Mr. Mickelson cited other similar zoning actions which had been acted upon in the manner recommended by the City Planning Commission, and explained that if this reclassification is approved, development would take place in accordance with site development standards, which would offer pro- tection to others in the area. The Mayor pro tern asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Wayne Reedstrom, 517 Falcon Street, acting as spokesman for those opposing the subject reclassification, called attention to public hearings held July 9, 1968, on similar proposals initiated by the City Planning Commission concerning properties included in the recent Front-On Study. He noted the slwi~arity to the subject reclassification, in that no applications had been made by the property owners involved, and no specific plans for development were submitted. Reading from a July 10 newspaper account of the City Council meeting of July 9, 1968, Mr. Reedstrom stated that people want no change of zone, access solutions, or Area Development Plans that they themselves have not initiated; that until plans for development are available, rezoning should not be considered. Councilman Dutton asked if any of those present objecting to the subject reclassification owned property on Euclid Street; there was no response. He pointed out that the proposals denied by the City Council on July 9, 1968, were opposed by some of the property owners involved, which was not the case in this instance. The Mayor pro tern asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. Paul Lindstrom, 401 South Euclid Street, spoke in favor of the proposed reclassification, and called attention to the fact that twelve people who own property in the subject area were on record in favor of the reclassi- fication, and the remaining property owner had verbally expressed approval to him. He reported that he purchased his property in order to practice optometry there, and stated it was not suitable for use as a residence, and ~ ........ Ii ~~ ,~ 1 ~ 68-454 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968., .1.:;.30 PJ(, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROPRIATING CERTAIN FUNDS FOR ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH THE ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE DOING OF SAID ADVER- TISING; AND PROVIDING FOR COMPENSATION TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SERVICES TO BE RENDERED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, Roll Call Vote: ,~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-473 duly passed and adopted. LA PALMA-MlRALOMA ANNEXATION - RESOLUTION NO. 68R-474: The City Clerk submitted petitions, checked and found to be sufficient, requesting annexation of ~ uninhabited territory known and designated as La Palma-}liraloma Annexation. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-474: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-474 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS THE LA PALMA-MIRALOMA ANNEXATION; DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRiTORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY SO PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public Hearing September 24, 1968, 1:30 P.M.) ~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-474 duly passed and adopted. COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY - APPOINTMENT: Council discussion was held regarding the vacancy on the Community Center Authority created by the resignation of John Mitchell. The following names were submitted for consideration: David Snow, James Morris, and William Thorn. The City Attorney pointed out that appointments are a dual function of the City Council and the Anaheim Union High School District Board of Trustees, and suggested that the City Council either submit a list of names to the Board of Trustees for their consideration, or request nominations from them for final selection by the City Council. The matter was held over to determine the next meeting of the sc.hool board. BUILDING CODE - POSSIBLE AMENDMENT: Councilman Dutton suggested exploring the possibility of amending the Code to require contractors to repair damages to buildings caused in the installation of plumbing, air conditioning facilities, etc., and asked that the appropriate department study the problem and make a recommendation. ~ I RECESS: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Clark, the meeting was recessed to 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED (4:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS (7:00 P.M.): Mayor pro tem Schutte called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Mayor Pebley. 68-452 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30~ 1968~ 1:30 P,M. ORDINANCE NO. 2547: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2547 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.50, SECTION 15.50.010 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE MECHANICAL CODE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2547 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2548: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2548.for adoption. t Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-83 - R-l) Roll Call Vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2548 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2550: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2550 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-68 (1) - R-3) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented to the City Council by the City Manager for their information: a. Submitted by J. W. Wallen, Assistant Secretary, National Convenience Stores, Inc., for Off Sale Beer & Wine - Person to Person Transfer for Stop and Go Market at 530 North Magnolia Avenue (C-l Zone). b. Submitted by George A. Hunt, Assistant Secretary, Beech-Nut, Inc., for On Sale General (Bona Fide Eating Place) Person to Person - Premises to Premises Transfer, for Dobb's Houses, at 1850 South Harbor Boulevard (C-R Zone). No Council action was taken on the above applications. GEORGE COLOURIS PRODUCTIONS. INC: The City Manager reported on a meeting with representatives of Co1ouris Productions and submitted an agreement for Council approval authorizing Colouris Productions to furnish promotion, public relations and advertising services for the Anaheim Convention Center. RESOLUTION NO, 68R-471: On the recommendation of the City Manager, Council- man Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-47l for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE COLOURIS, DBA GEORGE COLOURIS PRODUCTIONS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE FURNISHING OF PROMOTIONAL, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR THE ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NO ES : ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. COUNCIIMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: ,j" ~ ----. ~ 68-450 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1968, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT DEED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE IN CONNECTION WITH COUNTY IMPROVEMENT OF LINDA VISTA STREET. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCI LMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. ~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-464 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of structural steel for Dowling and Yorba Substations, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of H. K. Porter Co.: VENDOR Coast Iron & Steel, Santa Fe Springs Welders Torro, Bell Gardens- - - - - - - - H. K. Porter Co., Los Angeles- - - - TOTAL PRICE, INCL. TAX - $ 22,653.75 - - - - 25,608.45 - - - - 20,989.50 On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Clark moved that the low bid of H. K. Porter Co. be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $20,989.50, including tax. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-465 - DEED OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-465 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Donald E. and Alice J. Pierotti) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NO ES : ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-465 duly passed and adopted. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Timothy Mounts for personal injury damages purportedly incurred on or about April 20, 1968, in the vicinity of reservoir located at the southwest corner of Orangethorpe and Placentia Avenues, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance agent, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Krein. MOTION CARRIED. ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS: On report and recommendation of the Superintendent of Streets, Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 68R-466 through 68R-470, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-466: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX FOR THE FREEWAY PARK HIGHWAY LIGHTING DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 1968-69. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 68R-467: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1965-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR, SEP- TEMBER 1, 1968 TO AUGUST 31, 1968, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. 68-448 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30, 1998, 1:30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-458 duly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 963: Previously granted to permit a day school, property located on the south side of South Street, west of State College Boulevard. Correspondence dated June 10, 1968 from Robert Orr, representing new owners of said property, was submitted requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 963. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-459: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-459 for adoption, terminating all proceedings on said Condition Use Permit, as recommended by the Development Services Department. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 963 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 67R-64l NULL AND VOID. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: A:r3ENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-459 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NOS. 6686 AND 6688: Developer - Schmid Development Company, tracts located on the west side of Orchard Drive, north of Orangethorpe Avenue; Tract No. 6686 containing 65 proposed R-2 5,000 zoned lots, and Tract No. 6688 containing 78 proposed R-2 5,000 lots. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Clark, Tentative Map, Tract Nos. 6686 and 6688 was continued to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 68-69-8, as requested by petitioner. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTI,ON NO.. 6GR~.,+GC,: On th::; recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-460 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 68R-352, Condition No. I (Reclassification No. 67-68-86), to read: 1. That the final tract map of the property be submitted to the City Council for approval and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a building permit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AHAHEIM AMENDING ~ '~SOLUTION NO. 68R-352 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 67-68-86. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSEI':L: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-460 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2549: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2549 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-86 - C-l & R-3) ,~:: ~i~ti ~.r .....-..- ~ .~ I" 68-446 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30~ 19Q8~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to address the City Council. Mr. Dwight Mies, 11922 Comstock, Garden Grove, representing the applicant, stated that it was possible to redesign the building to comply with the 150' setback requirement by eliminating one unit; that the develop- ment would then consist of 22 units, instead of 23 as originally planned. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-456: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-456 fort adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planningh Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-6 - R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayo~ declared Resolution No. 68R-456 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-457: Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-457 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1996 in part, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1996. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOE S : ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. COUNCIlMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-457 duly passed and adopted. DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application filed by Bonnie Pennington for permit to allow dinner dancing at Magic Carpet, 332 East Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Council- man Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Carmen D. Sanchez on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana #14 for permit to conduct public dance Sep- tember 8, 1968 at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Street, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. :.......... i ~ ~ 1 ., 68-444 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30~ 1968~ 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6659, be approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-5: Submitted by Frank Stueckle and Frances Millings requesting a change in zone from C-2 and R-3 to C-3, property located at the southwest corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Water Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-201, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: n 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a IS-foot radius corner return for street widening purposes. The corner return shall provide for an ultimate dedication of 40 feet along Anaheim Boulevard. 2. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ per front foot, along Anaheim Boulevard and Water Street, for tree planting purposes. 4. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Water Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. ~ I 7. That parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6 feet in height and shall be directed away from theproperty lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 8. Subject property shall be developed in accordance with the site development standards of the C-l, General Commercial, Zone, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6~ 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final bu!lding and zoning inspections. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the applicants propose a new auto sales facility to be located on said property. Mayor Peb~ey asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. I I t RESOLUTION NO. 68R-455: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-455 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. . 68-442 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30. 1968~ 1:30 P.M. 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the vehicular access rights to Rio Vista Street for the "Not a Part" shown on the Tentative Map of Tract No. 6659, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. Temporary access will be permitted to the "Not a Part" from the stub end of "H" Street. The City Planning Commission recommended said Variance be granted, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-200, subject to the following conditions: ~ 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-4. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor4- ance with renderings on file with the City of Anaheim; provided, however, that the northerly lots of subject property, abutting R-l, 7200 square foot lots, shall be a minimum of 65 x 100 feet, and that the remainder of the lots shalli' be not less than 5500 square foot lots. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the applicant was present, and wished to address the City Council. Mr. James M. Peters, Jr., of J. W. Klug Development Co., Inc., representing the applicant, indicated concurrence with the City Planning Commission recommendations. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-453: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-453 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. 1 Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-4 - R-l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NO ES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-453 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-454: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-454 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1995 subject to conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1995. 68-440 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 30t 19,68, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. George L. Hawthorne, 2903 Winfield Street, corner of 11 Kingsley Street, called attention to Reclassification No. 67-68-64 which t id was denied by the City Council on June 11, 1968, and the petition signed by 64 people opposing said reclassification, which involved the same property now under consideration. (Mayor Pebley entered the meeting - 2:05 P.M.) Councilman Dutton noted that Reclassification No. 67-68-64 was an application for R-3 zoning; that because of variance proposals filed for development in the area, it was felt that the entire area should be studied, along with the question of traffic circulation. Mrs. Hawthorne objected to any change in the General Plan which would allow development other than high quality R-l homes, and also ob- jected to adoption of any traffic circulation plan which would signifi- cantly increase traffic on Kingsley Street, as it would threaten the safety of the many small children in the neighborhood. Mr. Mark Andrews, 134 West Ball Road, commended the City Planning Commission on their study, and urged approval of the General Plan Amend- ment on the basis that it would benefit the entire city. He noted that land available for residential development was now very limited, and if this land is devoted exclusively to R-l development, fewer residences would be available to the large number of people wishing to live in Anaheim. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. Joseph Huarte, 1464 East La Palma Avenue, indicated the location of his property on the map on the west wall, and stated that Alternate I of Area Development Plan No. 37 would be unfair to him, as the northerly portion of the proposed street right-of-way would be entirely developed on his property. He felt that Alternate 2 would be more equitable, as the right-of-way would be equally shared by both the school and himself. Mr. Thompson indicated that the City Planning Commission felt the property owner would receive the most benefit from the development of such a street, which the school did not necessarily need. He further explained that if land is taken from thepark property, additional park land would have to be acquired; that Alternates 3 and 4 were considered less desirable because removal of an existing home would be required and traffic through the existing single-family area would be increased. John Collier, Director of Parks and Recreation, reported that either Alternate 1 or 2 would be acceptable; that Alternates 3 or 4 would require the purchase of additional land for access to the proposed street. Mrs. James Worker, 102 South Alice, asked Mr. Collier to clarify where the required additional park land would be obtained if the resi- dential density is increased in this area. Mr. Collier indicated that the additional land would probably be contiguous to the southerly boundary of the school property, west of the present park site. Mr. Albert Tousseau, 6672 Richfield Road, stated that he felt the owners of property in the subject area, two of which he represents, would prefer more specific zoning designations on their particular proper- ties, as in some instances of transitional zoning, a property owner would be negotiating with three different developers. Mrs. Sue Geriak, 2913 Hempstead Road, spoke in favor of adoption of Alternate 1 or 2 of the Area Development Plan, since the traffic flow would then be channeled into two streets instead of one. She objected to R-3 development on Frontera Street on the basis of increased density in the area. ., ~ ~ ~ 68-438 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Julv 30~ 1968~ 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-222, recommended the adoption of Area Development Plan No. 37, Revised, Exhibit "A", Alternate No.1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 101: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to consider an amendment to the General Plan proposing a change in land use symbology from low density to medium density, property located generally south of the Riverside Freeway between Rio Vista Street on the west and Glaslell Street on the east. The City Planning Commission, by motion, recommended termination of all proceedings on General Plan Amendment No. 101 on the basis that the area was now a portion of General Plan Amendment No. 97. ~TIOIAL USI PlIKIT NO. 1029: Submitted by Arthur and Hulda Hemmerling, Koler P.nnier .nd Lorraine Prater, requesting permission to establish a mobil. home park, property gen.r.1ly located on south side of Frontera Street, ve.t of 01....11 Str.et. The City Plannins Commi..ion, by motion, terminated all proceedings on laid Conditional U.. Permit, pur.uant to petitioners request for wi thdraw.l. UCUlSI'ICATIOI 10. 67-68-98 AID VAR.IAlCE NO. 1989 ('rIN~A'rIV~. T~9T _.NOl 6647. &I!lIJOllO. 1: Submittad by Jennie L, Dinkler, requesting change of zona from a-A to a-2 5,000 .nd waiver. of maximum lot coverage and minimum front .etback to plrmit 117 1-2 5,000 lot.; proparty located .ast side of lio Vi.t. Strllt, North of Lincoln. Public hearinl wa. continu.d from thl ~atinl of July 23, 1968, .t thl raque.t of Mr. Barnard MCCuna, S , S Con.truction Co. Tha City Clerk .ubmitted corra.pondanca dated July 29, 1968, from Mr. MCCunl, rlqua.tinl that public hlarinl on .aid rlela..ilieatlon and varianca b. further continuad for thi~ty daYI, '011owinl Council di.cuI.ioft, dlel.ion on rlqul.tld contlnuancl wa. defarrld plndinl action on Glnera1 Plan Amandmant 10. 97. Zoninl Supervilor Ronald Thomp.on noted thl location of the .ubjact proplrtil., thl Ixi.tinl U.I. and zoninl in thl aria, > and brilfed tha Ividlnca lubmittad to and con.idared by the City Planninl Commi'lion. CIDI4L rt.AI AMltmMlHT NO. 97: Mr. Thomp.on reported that Exhibit "A", po.tad on the we.t wall of thl Council Chamber., and racommanded by the City P1anninl Commi..ion, depicted the fo11owinl: (1) The araa b.cw..n Fronter. Street on the north and a future e..t-we.t collector .treet on the .outh .. medium-density residential development. Undeveloped land south of this future collector i8 designated low-medium (specifyinS R-2 5,000) with a low-density desisnation adjacent to daveloped 8ubdivi.ions. (2) The are. immediately north and e.st from the shopping center .t Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street as medium-density development; the remaining undeveloped land i8 designated low-medium (specifying R-2 5,000) with a low-density designation adjacent to development subdivisions. (3) A transition in residential densities (from low to medium density) for undeveloped land located northwest from the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street. Low-density would be designated adjacent to pending Tract 6659, low-medium (specifying R-2 5,000) is indicated adjacent to the low-density symbology, and medium-density is designated adjacent to the low-medium symbology. If developed as designated, it is estimated by staff personnel that the entire area of approximately 173 gross acres could accommodate 2,030 dwelling units, housing 5,670 population. t. ~ ~ ---. I . i'