1956/08/14
1628
City Hal19 Anaheim~ Califor,ia. August 7~ 1956 - 7:00 PoMo
Said appointments were appr~ved by the City Council on motion by
Councilman Wisser ae"conded by Gouncil~an Fry. MOTION CARRIED.,
RECLASSIFICATION NOB F-55-56-17: Ordtnance reclassifying area lying on the
east side of North Citron Street running from La Palma Avenue, South approx-
imately 500 feet and having a depth of approximately 120 feet was submitted
for first reading.
-.,
The City Oouncil felt that ~n the interest of Public Safety and
Welfare if this area is to be commercJa1, necessary dedication of right-of-way
for the widening of La Palma Avenue mpst be made and witheld first reading
of said OrdinanceQ
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: Discussion wasiheld on the matter of issuing encroachment
permits to persons building over ease~ents.
Councilman Wisser moved to ~djourn. Councilman Coons seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED. /I
SIGNED I &~ JJt _ 11" ~--'
Ci ty cletk' - ~
~
City Hal19 AnaheimCj Califo!fnia, August 149 1956 - 7;00 P~M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Regular Session.
PRESENT: OOUNCILMEN; Coons, Fry, 5dhutte and Wisser.
ABSENT: CDUNCILMEN: Pearson.
CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner, PresEtnt~
CITY AIlviINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Keith 1\. Murdoch, Present.
MINUTES: The minutes of the Regular Meeting held July 24, 1956 and AdjoUrned
Regular Meetings held July 31, 1956 and August 7, 1956 were approved on
motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOe> 3418: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3418 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING
THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF AUGUST 14, 1956. 1 $329. 924.71)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote;
AYES,
NOES I
ABSENT ;
OOUNCILMEN:
OOUNCILMEN t
OOUNCILMEN I
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
No ne.
Pearson.
~
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
adopted.
OONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - BALL-DAL~ ANNEXATIONI The following certificate of
the City Clerk was submitted and read relative to the assessed valuation of the
area proposed to be anne~d and the assessed valuation of those properties
protesting said annexation:
1629
City Hall. Anaheim. California. AUQust 14, 1956 ~ 7:00 PaM.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss ~
CITY OF ANAHEIM
~
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that upon receipt of ,ritten protests to the inclusion of properties
within the proposed BALL=DALEiANNEXATION, this office checked said written
protests to determine the sufficiency thereof, and
I FURTHER CERTIFY, that according to the last equalized assessment
roll of the County of Orange,State of California, the assessed valuation of
privately owned property within said annexation is ao.~eO~8...... $ 914,513.00
AND, the assessed valuation of property appearing on the Public
Utility Rolls, State of California, (Southern California Edison Company)
is. " . Q . ~ . . " . . . to . . . <3l . . 0 . III 0 . . . It <lI . " " 0 . . It . . . . Go . .. 0 0 0 " (') . 0 0 eo . . . . . iii . . . . Q $ 5 , 880. 00
AND, the assessed v~luation of publicly owned property,
(Anaheim Union High School Di$trict) is 8.................8~...<lI. $ 11,310.00
AND, the assessed valuation of publicly owned property,
(Savannah School) is ....O.......OO.....................~.e..~... $
1,620.00
AND I FURTHER CERTIJY, that the total assessed valuation of
all land, exclusive of improvements, within the area proposed for
annex a ti on i S 8 '" . Q . . 0 .. . . . . 0 . 0 " . . 0 . . 0 ct . . co III . .. 8 . .. II . . 0 . 0 G . . . . 0 0 . . " . . ~ $ 933,323. 00
AND I FURTHER CERTliY, that the total assessed valuation of
property, exclusive of improvements owned by persons within said territory
proposed to be annexed who have filed written protests on or before
June 12, 1956, and whose ownelship I have been able to verify, including
those persons requesting their names be withdrawn from said written pro~
uests, as previously reported, is 00..0........0.".....8.......... $ 231,931~OO
AND, during the period from July 31, 1956, through and in-
cluding August 10, 1956, additional written protests have been filed
by owners of property having an assessed valuation, exclusive of 1m-
provements~ totaling aaQoo.OO..."00000ClOOGOltOIll.OOOOllllll...O..O....O. $ 24,750.00
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the assessed valuation of all
written protests filed to the inclusion of properties within said pro~
posed BALL=DALE ANNEXATION, exclusive of improvements, and according
to the last equalized assessmsnt roll of the County of Orange, State
of California, whose ownership I have been able to verify, including
those persons requesting their names be withdrawn from said written
pro t est s i S It QI . . . Q II 0 . . . 0 Q It . . .. It (f 4') G . ~ " 0 0 fl Ii . II e " . QI 0 0 0 Q Gl 0 0 . It . 0 . . e /I . . . $ 251, 801 . 00
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of
properties, exclusive of improvements owned by persons within said
territory proposed to be annexed requesting their names be withdrawn
from said protests as previously reported, was e.....eo..e.o.... $ 80,430.00
AND~ upon r~examination it was found that two persons
requesting their protests be ~thdrawn had not filed written protests
to said proposed annexation, therefore, the previously reported amount
i 5 red u c ed 0 e . " & a . . . . ~ . 0 (J . ~ . 0 It . " 0 0 " 0 0 lJ I) 8 (J II . . . . . . . . . . . . it . . . . it 0 0 " I!J $ 1 , 100. 00
AND, one owner of property included in the previously re-
ported amount requesting their protests be withdrawn, during the
pe~iod July 31, 1956~ through and including August lO, 1956, re--
protested the inclusion of his property in said proposed annexation
thereby reducing the above amount of the assessed valuation of his
property . c 0 a 0 IJ .. .. IJ .. . . . . (J e . . . . .. . " . . . 01) . . . e .. .. . '1 . .. . .. . . . . 0 (OJ C) 1l' . G> " Q . . <) .
$
3,780.00
16~~
City Hall, Anaheim. Califor~ia. Auqust 14~ 1956 ~ 7:00 PeM.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that! the total assessed valuation of
property, exclusive of improvements, ~wned by persons within said territory
proposed to be annexed requesting thefr names be withdrawn from said written
protests, is ""...O....(J8.(J....OOG0000.00C>00060..IlIOOC!l""00.."'~.....II.llfil.....00 $ 75,550000
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, thatlthe total assessed valuation of
property, exclusive of improvements, t..hiCh may be owned by persons within
said territory proposed to be annexedwhe have filed written protests to
said annexation but whose ownership rlhave not been able to verify by
reasons of irregularity in signaturest or fer other reasons previously re~
ported, was "8(J.."OOOO.OQ"GOOGoe.$OGO~.OOQO~.o@ooom~O"QOQ..Gaell'."eo $ 42,530.00
,~
AND, during the period of J~.'lY 3l, 1956, through and including
August 10, 1956, protests have been filed by proposed owners of property
increasing the previously reported am~unt ....Ge(Jo.oaOO.8..G~Q..O...G $
1,550.00
AND, during the period of J~ly 31, 1956, through and including
August IO, 1956, one owner of propertt satisfactorily proved ownership
thereby reducing the above amount .@~~...o".o..Qeaoo.eG.a~e...a8e... $
360.00
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the total assessed valuation of
properties exclusive of improvements ~hiCh may be owned by persons within
said territory proposed for annexatio1 who have filed written protests to
said annexation but whose ownership I !have not been able to verify by reason
of irregularity in signatures, or for!other reasons previously reported,
wa so. G 0 II ~ · · . 6 .. 0 . .. 0 . . . 0 " G .. 8 . lJ .. () . Q () 0 (Jo Ii /JIj <ll . (!l . . .. 0 . .. .. . . GI . . . .. . iii .. 0 0 .. . II . . .. .. . $ 42,860. 00
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that ~he total assessed valuation of
properties, exclusive of improvement5~ owned by persons within said ter-
ritory proposed to be annexed, filed ~rior to and including the 10th day
of August, 1956, including property wHich may be owned by persons within
said territory proposed for annexatiori who have filed written protests
against said annexation, but whose owrlership I have not been able to
verify by reason of irregularity in Sij,l~gnatures or for other reasons, and
including those persons requesting th~r protests be wi thdrawn from said
written protests is the sum of ..C)<il...,.......... ..oo".ctO.O....fl.... $ 294,661.00
;~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have ~ereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of the City of Anaheim this 14th day of August, 1956.
/s/ Dene M. Williams
DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the
City of Anaheim.
(SEAL)
Councilman Coons moved that the finding of the City Council be: That the
sum of $294,661.00, representing the tbtal value of the protesting parcel owners, be
found to be less than fifty percent of the total assessed valuation of the area pro-
posed for annexation, according to the last equalized assessment roll" Councilman
Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Request of property owners lOcated on the south side of Ball Road for
exclusion of their properties from the boundaries of the proposed annexation was
submitted and reade
Discussion was held regarding exclusion of property up to five percent of
the total area to be annexed, and the posSibility of excluding that territory within
the Webster Street tracta
The people located on the so~th side of Ball Road felt that their property
was the area most likely to be exclude~ as they presently join County territory to
the south.
---'.
The letters of transmittal a~d statements of above signed written protests
were read whereby a great number of the protestants indirectly requested the ex-
clusion of their ploperties from the proposed boundaries of the annexation.
1631
City Hal11i Anaheim9California. Auqust 1"- 1956 -- 7:00 P.M.
The Administrative Qfficer presented a map showing the areap~oposed
for annexation and the Webstet Street Tract was outlined thereon in red. He
advised that should the Council wish to exclude the area within the Webster
Street Tract it would be nece$sary to also exclude that area south of Ball Road
not requesting exclusion ther,by making the excluded area contiguous to County
territory~ Mr@ Murdoch also darkened the location of those parcels requesting
exclusion south of Ball Road$
It was moved by Councilman Fry that the Council exclude that ~ortion
included in the Webster Street Tract as outlined on the map in red and Cbmprising
of approximately fifty~five and one-half acrese Councilman Coons seconded the
motionG
After further discu~sion, Councilman Fry withdrew his previous motion
and Councilman withdrew his second theretos
RESOLUTION NO. 3419: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3419 and moved for
its passage and adoption excl~ding those properties 1n the Webster Street Tract
as outlined in red on the pre$ented map with the exception of those lots re-
questing not to be excluded, to-wit: Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20 of Tract No. 796.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNOIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXCLUDING CERTAIN
TERRITORY FROM BALL~DALE ANN~ATION CONSTITUTING LESS THAN FIVE PERCENT OF THE
TOTAL AREA THEREOF.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None
Pearson.
adoptede
The Mayor Pro Tern de,clared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
RESOLUTION NO. 3420: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3420 and moved
for its passage and adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTIOO
ON THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER" 19f>6. IN A CERTAIN TERRITORY IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF ANAH~IM PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM,
PROVIDING FOR THE HOLDING OF SUCH ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS RE~
SIDING IN SUCH TERRITORY THE QUESTION WHETHER SUCH TERRITORY SHALL BE ANNEXED
TO, INCORPORATED IN, AND MADE A PART OF SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE PROPERTY IN
SUCH TERRITORY BE, AFTER SUCH ANNEXATION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION EQUALLY WITH PRO-
PERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO PAY ITS PRO RATA PORTION, BASED UPON ASSESSED
VALUATION, OF ALL THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF SAID CITY dF ANAHEIM OUTSTANDING ON
THE 8TH DAY OF MAY, 1956, OR THERETOFORE AUTHORIZED; DESCRIBING SAID TERRITORY AND
DESIGNATING IT BY THE NAME OF ~ALL~DALE ANNEXATION; ESTABLISHING AN ELECTION PRE-
CIN:I.__AND POLLING PLACE IN SAID TERRITORY; APPOINTING THE OFFICERS OF ELECTION
FOR SAID SPECIAL ELECTION, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SUCH
ELECTION.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote;
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COU~ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.
Pearson.
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
1632
City Hall. Anaheimlt GalifoIjI1ia. AUQust 14. 1956 ~ 7:00 PoM.
PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. 578; S4bm1tted by Sand N Construction Company re-
questing permission to erect a tempo~ary sign at the southeast corner of Broadway
and Magnolia Avenues to advertise thd sale of houses and lots in Tract No. 2440.
The City PIanoi ng C ommi ssio~ pursuant to thei r Resoluti on No. 230
granted said Variance subject to thelfollowing conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5"
Signs shall be a maxim~ size of 10 by 25 feet.
Signs will be permitted! for a maximum period of 6 months or lesslJ
A permit must be taken ~ut with the Building Department.
The name of the sign co~pany must appear on every s1gn erected.
Signs must be lO feet b~ck of the right-af-way line of any street
or highwayp
At the intersection of the streets, the signs must be set back 25 2et.
All signs shall have a ~ foot ground clearance~
The fee per sign shall ~e $25000.
Sign variances shall be ,I permi tted for directional signs adverti sing
only tracts within the ~ity limits of Anaheim.
~
6~
7"
8e1
9.
Review of action taken by t~e City Planning Commission was ordered by the
City Council so that a general surveyicould be made of the number of signs ad...
vertising each tract and the number of houses within the tract so advertised.
Inasmuch as this informatio$ was still not available to the City Council,
the matter was ordered A 28 56 7:00 o'cloc PM, and the
applicants were requested to furnish his information at this time, on motion by
Councilman Coons, seconded by Council~an Fryo MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. VARIANCE NO. 579: Su*mitted by Trudy Richards Building Corporation
requesting an extension of time to si~n variance previously granted which is located
near the northeast intersection of Magnolia Avenue and Houston Street, advertising
the sale of houses and lots in Tract Mo~ 250l~
The City Planning Commissio~, pursuant to their Resolution No. 231,
granted said Variance subject to the iollowing conditions:
~
1. Signs shall be a maximu~ size of lO by 25 feet.
2. Signs will be peI1llitted'for a maximum period of 6 months or less.
3. A permit must be taken out with the Building Department.
4. The name of the sign co~pany must appear on every sign erected.
5. Signs must be 10 feet back of the right~of~way line of any street
or highway.
6. At the intersection of the streets, the signs must be set back 25
feet.
7. All signs shall have a 6 foot ground clearanceo
8. The fee per sign shall be $~b.oo.
90 Sign variances shall be permitted for directional signs advertising
only tracts within the city limits of Anaheim.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the
City Council so that a general survey could be made of the number of signs advertising
this tract and the number of houses within the tract so advertised.
Inasmuch as this information was still not available to the City Council,
the matter was ordered further continued to August 28. 1956. 7,00 o'clock P.M., and
the applicant was requested to furnish this information at this time, on motion by
Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. VARIANCE NO. 580, Sub~itted by Frematic Homes, Inc., requesting
permission to erect a temporary sign om the north side of Manchester Avenue
approximately 150 feet north of West La Palma Avenue, advertising the sale of
houses and lots in Tract No. 19400
--.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 232,
granted said Variance subject to the fQllowing conditions:
1633
City Hall, Anaheim. California. Auqust 14. 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
lo Signs shall be $ maximum size of lO by 25 feet.
20 Signs will be p$rmitted for a maximum period of 6 months or less.
3. A permit must b, taken out with the Building Department.
4e The name of the sign company must appear on every sign erectedo
5. Signs .traJst be 1.q)4 feet .ba'ck of the right-=ofco;:Jw'ay line of any street.
60 At th~ intersection of the streets, the signs must be set back
25 feete
7a All signs shall have a 6 foot ground clearance.
8. The fee per siglj1 shall be $25.00G
9. Sign variances .hall be permitted for directional signs advertising
only tracts wit~in the city limits of Anaheim.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by
the City Council so that a general survey could be made of the number of signs
advertising this tract and the number of houses within the tract so advertisedo
Inasmuch as this information was still not available to the City Council,
the matter was ordered further continued to AUQust 28. 1956~ 7:00 o'clock P.M.,
and the applicant was request.d to furnish this information at this time, on
motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. ~81: Submitted by A. F. Thomas requesting per-
mission to cut IO lots from ptoperty located briefly between Burton Street and
the proposed Houston Street Freeway.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 236,
granted said Variance subject to the following conditions~
l@ Limiting the sale during the next year to the three lots at the
extreme West end of the parcel, the balance of the parcel to be
kept as one lot.
2. Allowing two single~family dwellings or one duplex to be built
on the lots due to the depth.
3. The filing of a Record of Survey Map covering these four lots.
4. The installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalks along the three
lots to be sold@
5. The deeding of 10 feet along the South side of Burton Street for
the length of the entire parcel.
6. The payment of $25.00 per lot to the Park and Recreation Fund
for the three lots to be sold.
Appeal from action ta:ken by the Ci ty Planning Commi ssion was filed by
residents in the area and public hearing ordereda
matter~
The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the
A gentlemen in the audience referred to the petition protesting the
multiple dwelling units in this areaG
Another gentlemen from the audience informed the City Council that
this application for variance was obsolete as the property had been sold.
There being no further discussion on the matter, the Mayor Pro Tam
declared the hearing closed.
-~
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 3421: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No~ 3421 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO.
581..
163~
City Hall, Anaheim. California. AUQust 14. 1956 - 7:00 oQclock P.M.
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissere
None.
Pears~n <J
adopted..
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
,~
PETITION: A Petition supposedly
owners on East Burton Street re esti
and also requesting a 54 foot street
senting over seventy percent of the property
that sidewalks be eliminated on Burton Street
as submitted and reade
Said Petition was ordered teceived and filed with a favorable intention
shown on the part of the City Council~
Discussion followed regardi1,'9 the meeting to be held with the City of
Fullerton to consider the future planing of this area with reference to Flood
Control Channel, Freeway, and highwaYlmatters. It appeared that the owners~re-
sidents of the area that were present!and the City Council agreed regarding the
future planning of this area.
PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO~ 583: S~bmitted by George M0 Holstein and Sons, re-
questing permission to erect a tempor~ry sign advertising the sale of houses and
lots in Tract No. 2425~
The City Planning Commissiory, pursuant to their Resolution No. 233, granted
said Variance subject to the following conditions:
1. Signs shall be a maximu~ size of IO by 25 feet.
2~ Signs will be permittedlfor a maximum period of 6 months or less.
3~ A permit must be taken qut with the Building Department.
4. The name of the sign co~any must appear on every sign erected. ~
5. Signs must be 10 feet b~ck of the right-af-way line of any street.
6. At the intersection of ~he streets, the signs must be set back 25 feet.
7. All signs shall have a fi foot ground clearanceo
8~ The fee per sign shall ~e $25~OO.
9. Sign variances shall be [permi tted for directional signs adverti sing
only tracts within the c[ty limits of Anaheim.
Review of action taken by t~e City Planning Commission was ordered by tffi
Ci ty Counci 1 so that a general survey icould be made of the number of signs adverti sing
this tract and the number of houses within the tract so advertised.
Inasmuch as this information was still not available to the City Council,
the matter was ordered further continu~d to August 28, 1956, 7:00 o'clock P.M.,
and the applicant is requested to furn~5h this information at this time, on motion
by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 584: Sub~1tted by Tobin Company requesting permission
to erect a temporary sign advertising the sale of houses and lots in Tract No. 2465.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 234, granted
said Variance subject to the following conditions:
l~ Signs shall be a maximum size of 10 by 25 feet.
2. Signs will be permitted for a maximum period of 6 months or less.
3. A permit must be taken o~t with the Building Department. --r
40 The name of the sign company must appear on every sign erected. .
5e Signs must be 10 feet batk of the right~of~way line of any street.
6. At the intersection of the streets, the signs must be set back 25 feet.
70 All Gigns shall have a 6 foot ground clearance.
8. The fee per sign shall be $25.00.
9~ Sign variances shall be ~ermitted for directional signs advertising
only tracts within the city limits of Anaheim.
1635
City Hall, Anaheim~ California. AUQust 14, 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council so that a general survey could be made of the number of signs
advertising each tract and the number of houses within the tract so advertised.
Inasmuch as this in~ormation was still not available to the City
Council, the matter was order~d further continued to Auqust 28, 1956. 7:00 o'clock
P.M., and the applicant was requested to furnish this information at this time,
on motion by Councilman Coons,: seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. ~86: Submitted by E.A. Fahrion requesting per-
mission to cut two lots off pnoperty described briefly as located on the north
side of Broadway, east of East Street.
The City Planning Cqmmission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 239,
granted said variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. The installation of sidewalks in front of the lots.
2. The payment of $25.00 per lot to the Park and Recreation Site
Fund.
3. The filing of a Record of Survey Map with the City of Anaheim
and the Councy af Orangeo
The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone wished to address the Council on
the matter.
No one present objected to the granting of said Variance and no written
protests were received in the office of the City Clerk, thereupon the Mayor Pro
Tem declared the hearing closed~
RESOLUTION NO. 3422: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3422 and moved for
its passage and adoption, granting said Variance subject to the conditions as
outlined by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 586.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.
Pearson.
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tern de'elared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. F=55~56~40: Submitted by Oliver G. Baker
requesting C,.,l Zoning on propetrty described briefly as located at the southwest
corner of Lincoln and Stanton Avenues, comprising approximately 57.14 acres.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 235,
recommended said Reclassification, subject to the following conditions:
1. In order to make the present~ses on Lincoln Avenue conforming,
that the area along Lincoln Avenue for a depth of 276 feet from
the center line be classified as C-3, Heavy-Commercial.
2. The area on the West side and the South side be classified as
~l, Parking, for a depth of 150 feet. This will protect the
single~family residences on the West and future development on
the South.
3. The balance of the property to be classified as C-l, Neighborhood-
Commercial.
4~ An access road to be provided back of Lincoln on Stanton Avenue
as designed by the City Engineer of the City of Anaheim.
1630
City Hall, Anaheim. Califorpia, Auqust 14, 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
matter.
The Mayor Pro Tern asked if ~nyone wished to address the Council on the
Mr. Henderson, representing.1 the property owners within the area requesting
reclassification, addressed the Counc~l urging the requested change of zone.
No one present at the meetihg objected to said reclassification and no
written protests were received in thej office of the City Clerk, thereupon, the Mayor
Pro Tern declared the hearing closed~
---,
RESOLUTION NO. 3423: Councilman Schu~te offered Resolution No@ 3423 and moved for
its passage and adoption, authorizingl the preparation of an Ordinance changing said
zone pursuant to the conditions as ou~lined by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Res,olution Book, p~ge
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TiE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT
A CHANGE OF ZONE IS NECESSARY IN CERTIN AREAS OF THE CITY AND THAT ARTICLE IX,
CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CO E SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ACCOMPLISH SAID CHANGE
OR ZONE. (F-55-56~40 - C-3, C-l an~ P-l Zones)
On roll call the foregoing lesolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons. Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None .1
Pearscpn@
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. -56-57-3: Submitted by Spadrom Estates re~
questing that Tract No. 2401 be rezon d from R-l to R-3. Said tract is bounded by
West La Palma Avenue on the south, Ro~neya Drive on the north, and North Citron
Street on the west.
~
I
The City Planning Commissio~, pursuant to their Resolution No~ 242, re-
commended said Reclassification subje4t to the filing of deed restrictions covering
the type of dwellings to be erected irt the subdiviSion. Such deed restrictions to
be ready for presentation to the City Council at the time set by them for their
hearing.
matter.
The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the
Recorded Deed Restrictions as recorded July 25, 1956, Document No. 101015
in Book 3590, pages 460 through 463, was submitted.
Mr. Alvin Lesser addressed ~he Council and advised that this tract was
originally zoned R-3 by the County of 'Orange, and at the request of the developers
was changed to R-l. It was their opinion because of sale pattern and trend that
this area should be changed back to the original R~3 zoning.
No one present at the meeting objected to said reclassification and no
written protests were received by the City Clerk, thereupon, the Mayor Pro Tern
declared the hearing closedQ
RESOLUTION NO. 3424: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3424 and moved for
its passage and adoption~
--.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT
A CHANGE OF ZONE IS NECESSARY IN CERTA[N AREAS OF THE CITY AND THAT ARTICLE IX,
CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED TO ACCOMPLISH SAID CHANGE
OF ZONE. (F~56-57'~3 ~ R--3)
1637
City Hall, Anaheim. California. AUGust 14, 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
On roll call the fo~egoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN=
COU NC I LMEN;j
COUNCILMEN=
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
NoneeJ
Pearson.
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tern d~clared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
VARIANCE NO. 569: Submitted ijy R & W Construction Company, requesting permission
to construct a bowling alley, billiard hall, restaurant and cocktail lounge on
property located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and West La Palma
Avenue.
The City Planning CommisSion, pursuant to their Resolution No. 12,
denied said Variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
the R & W Construction Company together with a request for a period of 60 days
time before any action is taken by the City Council on the above variance.
Mre Paul Woodings, resident-owner in the area, addressed th~ City
Council and called attention to the petition filed with the City Planning
Commission containing approximately 800 signatures in opposition to the granting
of this variance, and further requested that this petition be made a part of the
record to be considered by the City Council. He also requested that the hearing
be held by the City Council on this matter at the earliest possible date.
Public hearing was ordered to be held September 11. 1956. 7:00 o'c1ock
P.M. on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED.
VARIANCE NOS. 594, 595, 596, 597. 598 and 607: VARIANCE NO. 594, submitted by
Butler~Harbour Construction Company, requesting permission to erect a temporary
directional sign to advertise the sale of houses and lots in Tract N~. 2780 and
3044, said sign to be located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue approximately
200 feet west of Grand Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 13,
granted said Variance subject to the following conditions:
1. Signs shall be a maximum size of 10 by 25 feet.
2. Signs will be pe~itted for a maximum period of 6 months or less.
3. A permit must be taken out with the Building Department.
4. The name of the sign company must appear on every sign erected.
5. Signs must be 10 feet back of the right-of-way line of any street
or highway.
6. At the intersection of the streets, the signs must be set back 25
feet..
7. All signs shall have a 6 foot ground clearance.
8.. The fee per sign shall be $25.00.
9. Sign Variances shall be permitted for directional signs advertising
only tracts within the City limits of Anaheim.
VARIANCE NO. 595. submitted by Butler-.Harbour Construction Company, re-
questing permiSSion to replank the south side of an existing sign located on the
east side of Stanton Avenue approximately 1300 feet south of Lincoln Avenue.
The City Planning CommiSSion, pursuant to their Resolution No. 14,
granted said Variance subject to the conditions as outlined in their Resolution
No. 13.
1638
City Hall. Anaheim. Califo~nia. AUQust 14. 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
VARIANCE NO. 596. submitte~ by Butler-Harbour Construction Company, re-
questing permission to repaint an exilsting sign located on the east side of Stantm
Avenue 500 feet north of Lincoln Ave1ue.
The City Planning Commissiqn, pursuant to their Resolution No. 15, granted
said Variance subject to the conditi9ns as outlined in their Resolution No. 13.
VARIANCE NO. 597 submitted ~y Merdian Realty Corporation, requesting per- ~
mission to erect a temporary directi~al sign to advertise the sale of houses and
lots in Tract No. 2501. Sign to be Ipcated at the northeast corner of Euclid and
Broadway.
The City Planning Commissiop, pursuant to their Resolution No. l6, granted
said Variance subject to the conditio~s as outlined in their Resolution No. 13.
VARIANCE NO. 598 submitted ~y George M. Holstein & Sons, requesting per-
mission to erect a temporary directi~nal sign advertising the sale of houses and
lots in Tract No. 2425. Said sign tol be located at the northwest corner of Euclid
Avenue and Beacon Street.
The City Planning Commissio~, pursuant to their Resolution No. 17, granted
said Variance subject to the conditiohs as outlined in their Resolution No. 13.
VARIANCE NO. 607. subm1ttediby Ford Development Company, requesting per-
mission to erect a temporary directio~al sign advertising the sale of houses and
lots in Tract No. 2573, said sign to ~e located on the east side of Cypress Street
approximately 200 feet north of Romn,ya Drive.
The City Planning Commissio~, pursuant to their Resolution No. 18, granted
said Variance subject to the conditio~s as outlined in their Resolution No. 13.
Discussion was held by the City Council in reference to the number of
variances granted for temporary signs~ Councilman Coons felt that there should be ~
some relation between the number of sIgns granted and the number of houses to be
sold in the tracts.
Councilman Schutte moved that the action taken by the City Planning
Commission in granting the above variances, be sustained. Councilman Fry seconded
the motion.
The foregoing motion was du]y passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
Coons.
Pearsdn.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared ~e foregoing motion carried.
VARIANCE NO. 599: Submitted by A. E. ~obertson, requesting permission to use the
present dwelling at 898 South Palm St~eet for a home and real estate office.
The City Planning Commissionl, pursuant to their Resolution No. 19, granted
said Variance subject to the following, condi tions:
1. The providing of improvep off-street parking at the rear of the dwelling.
2. The placing of no signs between the dwelling and the sidewalk.
3. Any sign on the dwelling,must be parallel to South Palm Street and
specify only the name and business being conducted on the premises.
No action was taken by the City Council.
VARIANCE NO. 601: Submitted by Carroll G. Bland, Jr., requesting permission to use
present dwelling at 1815 West La Palma Avenue for a real estate office.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 20, granted
said Variance subject to the following conditions:
1639
City Hall. Anaheim.Ca1ifornia. AUQust 14. 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
,-.-
1. The deeding to the City of Anaheim, 20 feet for the widening of
West La Palma AYenue@
2. The installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalks along West
La Palma Avenue~
3. Any sign advertising the Real Estate Business to be limited to
4 feet by 8 feet.
4& The providing of improved off~street parking at the rear of the
property"
No action was taken by the City Council.
VARIANCE NO. 602:. Submitted py William T. McManus, requesting permission to
erect a professional bui1dington property described briefly as the south side
of Lincoln Avenue approximately 1,513 feet west of Euclid Avenue.
The Ci ty Planning Commi ssion, pursuant to their Resolution No. 21,
granted said Variance subject to the following conditions:
l~ The installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalks along Lincoln
Avenueo
2. Landscaping to be provided in front of the building.
3. Erection of building in accordanoe with plans presented.
RESOLUTION NO. 3425: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3425 and moved
for its passage and adoption, granting said variance subject to the conditions
as outlined by the City Planning Commission and further subject to the necessary
dedication of right-oi-way fOIr street purposes, and that the building set-back
line shall be maintained at a minimum of 76 feet from the center line of Lincoln
Avenue.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
r-
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 602.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN!:
COUNCILMEN,:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.
Pearson
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
adopted.
VARIANCE NO. 603; Submitted by Helen and Laura Porter, requesting permission
to continue the use of the property located on the east side of Euclid Avenue,
north of La Palma Avenue for a real estate office~
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 22,
granted said Variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. The deeding of 20 feet along Euclid Avenue to the City of
Anaheim by the owners for street widening.
2. Black topping or oiling the off-street parking area on the
North side of the property to eliminate dust nuisance.
3. The Variance to expire one year from date.
,-,
RESOLUTION NO. 3426; Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3426 and moved
for its passage and adoption, granting said Variance subject to the conditions
as outlined by the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the
widening and improvement of the Euclid Street frontage.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
164U
City Hall, Anaheim, Califo~ia. Auqust 14, 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF UHE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 603.
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCI LMEN:
Coon~, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.1
pearspn
~
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared ~he foregoing Resolution duly passed and
VARIANCE NO. 604: Submitted by Butle~.' Harbour Construction Company, requesting re-
duction of required front yard set...ba~ks on certain lots within Tract No. 3044.
The City Planning Commissiop, pursuant to their Resolution No. 23, gran~d
said Variance for a 20 foot front yar~ set-back on Lots 1-5 inclusiveJ 9-18 inclusive;
22-27 inclusive; 29-31 inclusivel andl22 foot front yard set-back on Lots 28, 30 and
32.
No action was taken by the ~ity Council.
VARIANCE NO. 605: Submitted by Kenneth E. Clark, requesting permission to expand
the automobile wrecking yard on North~Manchester Avenue to include the property
previously occupied by the Walt Taylo~ Lumber Company.
The City Planning Commissioh, pursuant to their Resolution No. 24, denied
said Variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
Mr. Kenneth E. Clark.
Public hearing was ordered to be held on the matter September 11, 1956,
7:00 o'clock P.M., on motion by Counct1man Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry.
MOTION CARRIED.
II
VARIANCE NO. 606: Submitted by Eugene and Margaret McLaughlin, requesting per-
mission to operate an office equipment servicing business at 1003 South Claudina
Street.
The City Planning Commissiom, pursuant to their Resolution No. 25, granted
said Variance, subject to a sign to be located on the alley side of the garage.
No action was taken by the City Council.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-56-57-8: SubmItted by Leo Freedman, requesting M-l zoning
on property located on the west side ()f Haster Street, north of Katella Avenue.
Public hearina was ordered to be held September 111 1956, 7:00 o'clock P.M.
on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-56-o7-1: Submitted by Leighton D. Jaeger, requesting C-l
zoning on property located on the east side of South Placentia Avenue between the
Anaheim-Olive Road and East Santa Ana Street.
Public hearing was ordered to be held on the matter September 11, 1956,
7:00 oOclock PeM., on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons.
MOTION CARRI~D.
11
TRACT NO. 2450: Tract No. 2450 located at the southwest corner of Gilbert Street
and Orange Avenuee Communication from the South Bay Engineering Company was submitted
and read requesting further extension of time and reconsideration of said tract
because of delay in recordation due to circumstances beyond their control.
Councilman Schutte moved that the action taken by the City Council
August 7, 1956 denying requested extension of time be rescinded, and that said
extension of time be granted for a period of six months commencing August 1, 1956.
Councilman Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
l641
City Hall. Anaheim,California. AUGust 14. 1956 -. 7100 P.Me
TRACT NO. 2571: Request from Conley Engineering Company to reapprove Tract
No. 257l was submitted and reads Said Tract is located at the northwest corner
of Romneya Drive and Acacia Street.
Said request for extension of time was granted for a period of six
months on motion by Councilmat Schutte, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION
CARRIED.
""."...
I
TRACT NO. 2326: Communicatiom dated August 9, 1956 from Jones and Bednar,
Attorneys, with reference to $ubdivision and tract improvement bond for
Tract No. 2326 was submitted and read.
City Engineer, Geor~e E. Holyoke, advised the City Council that all
improvements had been held up and that the tract has not been finally approved.
It was moved by Coumcilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
that the matter be referred tQ the City Attorney to notify the bonding company
to perform on their bond and take such steps as required to pay and discharge
claims for labor and material$. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 3427& Council$an Coons offered Resolution No. 3427 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAH~IM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD
AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Fechter, et al)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
f
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN,
COUNCILMEN l;
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None
Pearson
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
RESOLUTION NO. 3428: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3428 and moved
for its passage and adoptionQ
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR
ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Fechter)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wlssero
None@
Pearson
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
RESOLUTION NO. 3429: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3429 and moved
for its passage and adoptione
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED
CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD
AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Kenneth Wo and Edna Lee Holt)
1642
City Hall. Anaheim. Califo~nia. AUQust 14. 1956 ~ 7:00 PaM.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coon~, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.1
Pear~n.
The Mayor Pro Tem declaredlthe foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted.
I
J
RESOLUTION NO. 3430& Councilman Coo~s offered Resolution No. 3430 and moved for i~
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, ~ge
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T~.,.. E CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CON-
VEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAI~ REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Carroll G.~ Bland, Jr.)
On roll call the foregoing ~esolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOE S :
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons~ Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.
Pearspn.
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared ~he foregoing Resolution duly passed and
RESOLUTION NO. 3431: Councilman Coon~ offered Resolution No. 3431 and moved for
its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, p~ge
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TffE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CON-
VEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN'REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Millie Refland)
'!
On roll call the foregoing aesolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
Noneo
Pearsc>>n.
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
APPLICATION FOR TAXI CAB STAND: Mr. Wrank Miller addressed the Council in re-
ference to his application for permiS$ion to establish a taxi cab business within
the Oity of Anaheim.
This matter was held over to August 28, 1956 for the completion of in-
vestigation reports and the compliance of the required bonding and insurance pro-
vi s ion s .
.COMPLETION OF PROJECT NO. 52: George Eo Holyoke, City Engineer, certified that the
Sully-Miller Contracttng Company had qompleted the improvement of Wilhelmina Street,
Project No. 52, in accordance with pl~ns and specifications, and recommended the
work be officially accepted.
-,
RESOLUTION NO. 3432: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3432 and moved for its
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, p~ge
1643
Ci tv Halllll Anaheim.!California. AUQust 14. 1956 - 7:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITYCOUNqIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE
COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND
EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, RJEL AND
WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WOR~ NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOL-
LOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: lliE IMPROVEMENT OF WILHELMINA STREET.. FROM THE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT=dFa=WAY TO THE FIRST ALLEY WEST OF CLEMENTINE
STREET It PROJECT NO. 52.
~
On roll call the fo~eg01ng Resolution was duly passed and adopted"
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN&!
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser~
Noneo
Pearson...
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
COMPLETION OF PROJECT NO~ 541 George Eo Holyoke, City Engineer, certified
that the Sully-Miller Contrac~ing Company had completed the improvement of
North Olive Street, Project NOQ 54, in accordance with plans and specifications
and recommended the work be officially accepted.
RESOLUTION NO. 3433: Councl1~n Schutte offered Resolution N03 3433 and
moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
,~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNGIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTIN G THE
COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND
EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITI ES Art) TRANSPORTATION IOCLUDING POWER, RJEL AND WATER,
AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPRqJEMENT OF NORTH OLIVE STREET II FROM LA PALMA
AVENUE TO COMMERCIAL STREET. AROJECT NO. 540
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following votea
AYES:
NOES;
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
Nonee>
Pearson.
adoptedo
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
ORDINANCE NO. 1082: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1082 for final
reading and moved for its passage and adoption~
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT PROVIDING FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM IN THE CALIFORNIA STATf EMPLOYEESw RETIREMENT SYSTEM.. MAKING ITS
EMPLOYEES MEMBERS OF SAID SYSTEM.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1082, and
having knowledge of the content! therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived~ Councilman Coons seconded the motion.
Motion unanimously carried.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None Q
Pearson"
1644
City Hall, Anaheim, Califorpia, AUQust 14. 1956 ~ 7:00 PoMo
The Mayor Pro Tern declared ~he foregoing Ordinance NOQ 1082 duly passed
and adoptedQ
ORDINANCE NO. l083: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance Noo 1083 for final reading
and moved for its passage and adoptior~
Refer to Ordinance Book, pa~e
!......,
OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODEs
Streets bond, $59000~)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nos l083 and having
knowledge of the contents therein, co~.nCilman Fry moved the reading in full of
said Ordinance be waive~ Councilman ~oons seconded the motion3 Motion
unanimously carried.
On roll call the foregoing ~rdinance was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons. Fry, Schutte and Wlsser5
Noneo
Pears~n"
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing Ordinance Noo 1063 duly passed
and adopted"
ORDINANCE NO. 1084; Councilman Coons loffered Ordinance No. 1084 for final reading
and moved for its passage and adoptiooo
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM D~CLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COUOCIL TO~
VACATE AND ABANDON AN EASEMENT FOR AL~EY PURPOSES, UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; ijESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A PO~TION OF SAID PROPERTY; FIXINq A TIME AND
PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIREdTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE
PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. (Publtc hearing to be held September 11, 1956,
7:00 oUclock PoM,,)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No" 1084 and having
knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of
said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Fry seconded the motion.. Motion unanimously
carried..
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons~. Fry~ Schutte and Wisser<J
None"
Pearson"
The Mayor Pro Tem declared t~e foregoing Ordinance No. l084 duly passed
and adopted..
ORDINANCE NO. 1085; Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance NOQ 1085 for final reading
and moved for i ts passage and adoption.o
Refer to Ordinance Book, pag~
,~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO
VACATE AND ABANDON BRUCE STREET AND RO~NNE STREET, IN TRACT NO. 2844, AND EASEMENTS
FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH SAID
STREETS; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING THE POSTING
OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. (Public hearino
September 11, 1956, 7: 00 0 'dock p" Mo )
1645
City Hall, Anaheim,C.alifornia. Auqust 14. 1956 = 7:00 PsMs
After hearing read ~n full the title of Ordinance No. 1085 and having
knowledge of the contents thetein, Councilman Coons moved the reading in full
of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. Motion
unanimously carriedo
On roll call the fo~egoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote;
r
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN~
COUOCILMEN:i
COUNCILMEN:i
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None..
Pearsono
The Mayor Pro Tern ddclared the foregoing Ordinance No. 1085 duly
passed and adoptedo
ORDINANCE NO. 1086: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance No~ 1086 for final reading
and moved for its passage andadoptiono
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~NAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE III, CHAPTER 2 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION TO BE NUMBERED 3273.
(Speed limit on Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance NOal 1086 and having
knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading in full of
said Ordinance be waived3 Councilman Coons seconded the motion. Motion
unanimously carriedo
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUOCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and W!sser~
Noneo
Pearson.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Ordinance No~ I086 duly
passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1087: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance NOe 1087 for final
reading and moved for its passage and adoptione
Refer to Ordinance Book, page
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE IV. CHAPTER 1. PART 1,
SECTIONS 4100.2 AND 410083 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Kennels-
Issuance of tagso)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1087 and having
knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading in full
of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. Motion
unanimously carried.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None~
Pearsono
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the foregoing Ordinance No. 1087 duly
passed and adopted.
1640
. '":,.
City Hall, Anaheim. Califorria, Auqust 14. 1956 - 7:00 P.Mo
CALIFORNIA CABANA CORPORATION: Mro ~rray A~ Studley addressed the Council re-
que'sting permi ssion to obtain a busin~ss Ii cense to construct cabanas wi thin the
Ci-ty of Anaheim.
As this use is presently b~ng considered by the City Planning Commission,
this request and information was ref~red to the City Planning Commission to further
complete their studies&
FIRE STATION NO.3: Preliminary planis for Fire Station No" 3 were presented and
discussed.
:;
J
It was moved by Councilman ~oons, seconded by Councilman Fry, that tentative
plans for Fire Station No.3 be appro~ed and that the architect be instructed to
prepare final plans for presentation ~o the City Council August 28, 1956. MOTION
CARRIED.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: F1n~ncial and Operating Reports for the month
of July was ordered received and fil~ on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by
Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
ANNUAL REPORT ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OMMISSION: Annual Report of the Anaheim City
Planning Commission for the Fiscal Y r 1955~56 was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Schutte, second~ by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST TO LEAVE THE STATE: City Tr~surer was granted permission to leave the
State during the month of September o~ motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by
Councilman Coonse MOTION CARRIED.
DEPUTY CITY TREASURER: Councilman Copns moved that Miss Beatrice M. Miller be
appointed Deputy Ci ty Treasurer to adt in the absence of the Ci ty Treasurer.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motioh. MOTION CARRIED.
PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: Counc~lman Wisser was granted permission to leave :~
the State during 'the month of August, 1956 on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded
by Councilman Frys MOTION CARRIED.
PERSONNEL: The Administrative Office~ reported the appointment of the following
personnel: Marlene G. Hansard, Clerk~Typist II 1n Police Department; Jerry M.
Powers, Plant Operator, Electrical Department; Helen L~ McLean, Clerk-Typist II
in Police Department. Harold WQ Daou~st was appointed Deputy Ci ty Patrolman to
Un!form Rese~ve, serving without pay.
Said appointments were ratified by the City Council on motion by
Councilman Coons, seconded by Council~an Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1088: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1088 for first reading
and moved for its passage and adoption~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIXING AND LEVYING A PROPERTY
~ON ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1956~57. ($1~10)
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT TAXES: It was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by
Councilman Fry that the County Auditor be requested to extend the Metropolitan
Water District Taxes of the City of Anaheim to the County Tax Rolls and collect
them in the same manner as County taxes_ MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 3434: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3434 and moved for
its passage and adoption.
-.
Refer to Resolution Book, p~ge
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY: AUTHORIZING THS EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THEREOF; AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 33190 (Eml~ Mittman ~ $8,275e05)
1647
City Hall~ Anaheim. California, Auqust l4. 1956 ~ 7:00 P.M.
On roll call the fOfegoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYE S :
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN.
COUNCILMEN,
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
None.
Pearson..
,....
1
adopted.
The Mayor Pro Tem d,clared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and
RESOLUTION NO. 3435: Council.an Fry offered Resolution No.. 3435 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
fl'
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN~IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EMPLOYING QUINTON
ENGINEERS LTD. CONSULTING E' IN , TO MAKE AN EXPANSION STUDY OF THE MASTER
PLAN FOR THE PRIMARY WATER ST RAGE AND DISTRIBUTION T PREPARED BY SAID
ENGINEERS IN MAY, 1953.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMENJ
COUNCILMENa
COUNCILMEN:
Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
Noneo
Pea rson.
The Mayor Pro Tem dEtclared the foregoing Resolution duly pa'ssed
and adoptedo
TRASH COLLECTION: Communication from the Commercial Waste Paper Company, Inc.
with reference to trash collection contracts within the City of Anaheim was
referred to the City Attorney and Administrative Officer for investigation
and report on motion by Councilman SChutte, seconded by Councilman Coons.
MOTION CARRIED.
ONSALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE: Application for transfer of Onsale Beer and
Wine License to 1929 East AnaheiIJl-oOlive Road was discussed.
In view of the fact that this location is immediately adjacent to
the Miniture Golf Course on East Center Street where many teen-agers congre-
gate, it was considered not a proper place for an Onsale License, therefore,
Councilman Fry moved that the City Attorney be requested to appear and
protest the granting of said transfer to this locatione Concilman Coons
seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED.
REPORT REGARDING PEDDLERvS LICENSE: Report of the Police Department regarding
the conduction of a peddler's business near the Labor Camp was submitted and
read. Said report revealed that those persons selling near the LabOr Camp
pay their required daily peddler's license fee in the amount of $IO.OO each
day that the business is so conducted.
BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM: It was considered by
the City Council that those portions of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining
to the licensing of businesses within the City of Anaheim should be reviewed,
and the Administrative Officer and City Attorney were requested to review
these sections and prepare a report and recommendations for the City Council.
CRANE AMBULANCE SERVICES: The matter of continuing the employment of the
Crane Ambulance Service on a retainer basis was discussed and referred to the
Administrative Officer for recommendation and report.,
Councilman Coons moved to adjourn~ Councilman Fry seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED./)
SIGNED: ~ 717" ~ ~ >z-<-<o<-
Ci ty Clerk