1963/03/05
6527
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 26. 1963, 3:00 P,M,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1786 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-120. (Ducoff Property)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1821 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
INDUSTRIAL SALESMAN: Councilman Dutton requested consideration be given
regarding the employment of an industrial salesman for the purpose of
encouraging industries to locate in the City of Anaheim.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: nO:50 P.M.
SIGNED: ~ "7rr, d?~
City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte (entered the meeting
3:15 P.M.), Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
ABS ENT :
PRESENT :
Mayor Coons called the mepting to order.
MINUTES: Councilman Dutton moved to dispense with reading in full and approve
minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held February 19, 1963.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR ANNEXATION: Public hearing was held
pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-81, published in the Anaheim Bulletin
February 1 and 8, 1963.
The City Manager advised that subject annexation was an exchange
of uninhabited property between the Cities of Anaheim and Orange, to allow
inclusion of the Olive Hills Reservoir site within the boundaries of the
City of Anaheim.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council with
regard to the proposed annexation, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-165: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-165
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM KNOWN
AND DESIGNATED AS CITY OF ANAHEIM OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR ANNEXATION,
.""'_"_""""""'_'''A_.....",.,.^~"._,,_..._,,'''..._.__.,_,.....''''-. J
6528
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-165 duly passed and adopted.
-
ORDINANCE NO. 1822: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No, 1822 for
first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS CITY OF ANAHEIM OLIVE
HILLS RESERVOIR ANNEXATION.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1822 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-51 AND VARIANCE NO. 1545: Submitted by Cris Menzie
and Dr. William C. OiReilly, Owners; Richard L. Tom, Agent, requesting a
change of zone from R-3 to C-2, property located at the southwest corner of
Santa Ana Street and Harbor Boulevard, and further requesting waiver of
height limitations to allow construction of a three-story professional
office building.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 609,
Series 1962-63, recommended C-l zoning, subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of
Harbor Boulevard (34.75 feet existing).
2. Installation of sidewalks on Santa Ana Street in accordance with the
adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
4. Provision of a three (3) foot public utility easement and a two (2)
foot overhang easement along the southerly and westerly boundaries of
the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other
properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilities.
5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Harbor
Boulevard.
6. Subject to the approval of Petition for Variance No. 1545.
7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 5.
8. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
9. Recordation of C-l Deed Restrictions limiting the use of subject property
to business and professional office use only.
10. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of Harbor Boulevard and Santa Ana Street rights-of-way abutting
subject property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and
subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance
prior to Final Building Inspection.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 610, Series
1962-63, granted Variance No. 1545, subject to reclassification of subject
property to the C-l, Neighborhood Commercial Zone, as approved under Petition
for Reclassification No. 62-63-51.
Public hearing was held February 26, 1963, at which time said
hearing was closed and action of the City Council deferred to this date to
allow the applicant an opportunity to meet with the Zoning Coordinator for
the purpose of preparing a list of acceptable C-l uses which would be com-
patible with the surrounding area.
~;"'~i*,A'-----.;;;p'
6529
City Hall_ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
List of acceptable C-l uses for subject property, submitted by
Mr. Kreidt, was reviewed by the City Council and discussion was held. Said
list was marked Exhibit "A" and signed this date by Mayor Coons.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-166: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-166
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the
zone of subject property to C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amend-
ments thereto:
Condition No. ? - Installation of sidewalks on Santa Ana Street
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the
office of the City Engineer, prior to Final Building Inspection.
Condition No.7 - Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180)
days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. I, 5 and 9.
Condition No. 9 - Recordation of C-l Deed Restrictions, limiting
the use of subject property to those uses listed on Exhibit "A",
dated March 5, 1963, and signed by Mayor Coons.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED,
(62-63-51 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoIng resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YE S :
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-166 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-167: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-167
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1545, subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 62-63-51.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1545.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-167 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 3:15 P.M.
REQUEST - SOUTHLAND AMBULANCE SERVICE: Request of Leon Ninburg~ President~
Southland Ambulance 5ervice, dated February 21, 1963, for an opportunity to
participate in providing ambulance services required by the Police Department,
was submitted.
Memorandum report from the Chief of Police was submitted and
copies furnished each Councilman.
Mr. Leon Ninburg addressed the City Council, being of the opinion
that his letter was self-explanatory, and advised of new equipment obtained
to provide citizens with emergency service.
6530
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5, 1963. 3:00 P.M.
As interested parties in the audience were not familiar with the
contents of the letter referred to, Mayor Coons read said letter in full and
asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding this matter.
Mr. Sam Collins, Attorney representing Crane Ambulance Service,
advised they have served the City of Anaheim well for the past sixteen
years, and prior to the tremendous increase in population received monetary
assistance from the City for providing ambulance service to the citizens of
Anaheim. He called attention to an ambulance service started approximately
five years ago in the City which, because of insufficient demand, remained
in operation for only six to eight months. Mr. Collins stated their type of
business offered a unique service, and to adequately serve the citizens as
in the past, a reasonable profit must continue to be realized to maintain
adequate personnel and equipment. He further advised that over a four
month period ending in January, 1963, Crane Ambulance Service averaged
70.25 calls per month from the City of Anaheim; that Federal Communications
statIstics indicate Crane's average time to answer local calls is four
minutes, as opposed to the national average of eighteen minutes. He was of
the opinion Crane Ambulance could continue to render adequate service to
the City without the aid of a second ambulance company.
In answer to Councilman Chandler's questions, Mr. Collins advised
that Crane charges an average of $31.00 per call, computed by meter, of
which approximately 25% of said charges are uncollectable; they use direct
radio contact with each individual ambulance, and their established radio
at their office monitors police calls, which enables them to alert their
units prior to the police request.
Mr. E. R. Crane answered further questions of the City Council,
and related the standard equipment, required by law, maintained in their
uni t s.
Mr. Ninburg, in rebuttal, felt that there was no reason to restrict
a qrowing city to just one such service, and that cooperation between the
two companies would be of benefit to the City. He stated they presently
are in business in the City of Anaheim, that their request is for a percen-
tage of the police calls. In answer to Council questioning, he stated their
calls average approximately $36.00 each, of which possibly 20% are uncollect-
able; they have radio equipment in each vehicle and in their office, and
monitor police calls and respond as quickly as any other service.
Discussion was held by the City Council and report from the
Chief of Police received; it was the consensus of the Council that in con-
sIdering the health and safety of the citizens, Crane has been providing
adequate and efficient servIce, without cost to the City for such service;
that there is no apparent economic need or possibility that the City would
need additIonal ambulance service, and it appears doubtful the same quality
of service would continue if divided between two firms.
Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council uphold the recom-
mendation of the Chief of Police and deny request of Southland Ambulance
Service for a percentage of the emergency calls of the City Police.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1366 - REVISED PLANS: Revised plans dated February 13, 1963,
submitted by Fiesta Pools to allow construction of a second model swimming
pool at 2156 South Harbor Boulevard, in connection with Variance No. 1366,
were reviewed by the City Council tog~th~r with recommendaiions of the City
Planning Department (Conditional Use Permit No. 121).
Due to a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Chandler
withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue.
Mr. Jack E. Robinson, officer of Fiesta Pools, further explained
theIr revised plans.
-.~;.:~,fh.~:"':..:,"~-':;;'!i;"~H*~
6531
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963, 3:00 PiMa
Councilman Schutte moved that revised plans as submitted be
approved, sUbject to the provision that standard trash areas be provided,
and the construction of a five foot minimum height fence around the entire
pool site. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED,
SIGN REQUEST: Application submitted by Beach Motors, 1125 South Los Angeles
Street, requesting permission to replace an existing sign with sign having
four foot projection, together with plans, was reviewed by the City Council
together with report from the Building Department.
Mr. Agnew, of Santa Ana Neon Company, addressed the Council
advising that the business directly south of the applicantis property
has a projecting sign, as does another business aCross the street. In
his opinion, traffic approaching from the South would not be able to view
a sign on sJbject property unless the requested projection were granted.
Discussion was held by the City Council and the location of
subject property and existing signing on adjacent properties reviewed.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
said sIgn request was granted, with the provision that there be no projec-
lon over the property line. MOTION CARRIED.
CAI"X:ELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by
Councilman SchLtte, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested
to cancel County Taxes on the following property acquired by the City of
Anaheim for m~nlcipal purposes:
a. Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-I075, formerly assessed
to James Goodman, deed recorded February 14, 1963 as Document No. 10682,
in Book 6432, at page 789, Official Records of Orange County, California.
D. Property acq'uired pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-3, formerly assessed
to William H. and Naomi T. Neilans, deed recorded February 14, 1963, as
Document No. 10681 in Book 6432, at page 786, Official Records of
Orange Co~nty, California.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-168: Cot.ncllman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-168 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Jesus Samarippa - Lot 30, Mary Goodman Tract)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-168 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids
received for ~he purchase of photographic equipment for the new police
facility building, as fOllows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid,
that of Royce Photo Supply, Anaheim, in the amount of $2,579.41, including
tax:
Royce Photo Supply, Anaheim
Eastman Kodak Store, Los Angeles
Myer Reed Corp., Hollywood
Val & Vic, Anaheim
BOb's Camera, Anaheim
Winter & Company, Los Angeles
$ 2,579.41
2,716.32
2,779.37
No Quote
" "
" "
-""',......',~~w,.",'..,."_.....
~~,-,''''''''
6532
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963, 3:00 P,M,
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton
moved that the low bid of Royce Photo Supply be accepted and purcha~e
authorized in the amount of $2,579.41. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS - MUNICIPAL COURT AND LA PALMA PARK PARKING:' The
City Manager reported on informal bids received for demolition of building~
and site clearance on City property, as follows, and recommended acceptance
of the low bid, that of A. E. Fowler & Son, Orange, California, in the
amount of $7,480.00:
-
A. E. Fowler & Son, Orange
Foster Sand & Gravel, Fullerton
So. Calif. H00se Sales, Santa Ana
H. E. Slayton & Son, Anaheim
$ 7,480.00
10,500.00
12,700.00
23,370.00
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte
moved that the low bid of A. E. Fowler & Son be accepted, and said project
authorized in the amount of $7,480.00. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 51~0: Excerpt from the minutes of the City
Planning Commission meeting held March 4, 1963, regarding Orange County
U~e Variance No. 5120, proposing location of a two-story law and profes-
sional office building on property at the southwest Corner of Brookhurst
and Stonybrook Streets, was submitted.
Mr. Kreidt presented plans for the proposed development and
briefed the action of the City Planning Commission recommending that said
variance be approved, and suggesting that the Orange County Planning
Commission consider the height limitation overlooking the single family
homes by the requirement of opaque glass, special screening, or other
appurtenances to shield the single family homes.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held.
No further action was taken by the City Council on Orange County
Use Variance No. 5120.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-169: On the recommendations of Thornton E. Piersall, Director
of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-169 for
adoption, awarding construction of chain link fencing for the Municipal Golf
Course, Job No. 623, to Guardian Fence Company, the low bidder, in the
amount of $4,142.75.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: FURNISH AND INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCING AROUND PORTIONS OF THE
NEW ADDITION TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE LOCATED ON GILBERT STREET
BETWEEN CRESCENT AND LINCOLN AVENUES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 623.
(Guardian Fence Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, SChutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-169 duly passed and adopted.
"~""~"~t,;;"""";",~",,,,"'4,",..,___~'..,''-.I;";,,-'"'' --w-
'~~~'~.iH
6533
City Hall. Anaheim, California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5.1963.3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-170: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-170 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUN:IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR
BOULEVARD, EAST SIDE ONLY, FROM APPROXIMATELY 568 FEET NORTH OF ROMNEYA
DRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY 18 FEET SOUTH OF ROMNEYA DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 744; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA-
fIONS FOR THE CONSTRLCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was dUly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABS ENT ~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-170 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-171: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-171 for
adoptlon.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT
SUBMITTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY TO
CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A STORM DRAIN CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING INLET WITHIN
SAID DISTRICT~S RIGHT OF WAY OF THE ATWOOD CHANNEL AT MILLER STREET.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the foilow~ng vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABS ENf :
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNCILMEN ~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared ResolutIon No. 63R-l7l duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-172: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-172 for
adoption.
Refer to ResolutIon Book.
1\ RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (First Christian Church of Anaheim)
Or1 rOll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followlng vote:
A,YES:
NOES;
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared ResolutIon No. 63R-172 duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion b')l Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED:
a. Wendell H. Payne - regarding downtown area.
b. Frank C. Wilson - regarding transit problem.
c. City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 63-32 expressing opposition to A.B. No.
28; City of Newport Beach Resolution No. 5746 and City of Westminster
Resolution No. 461, also opposing Assembly Bill No. 28.
'~.'l.~t-'-,.-".,-.,.",,,",."~,.._....~-,,,,,,c",-"~;:""'-""""_ '"
6534
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3~00 P.M.
e. Minutes of Orange County Mosquito Abatement District meeting held
February 15, 1963.
f. Feather River Project Association - information on bills, resolutions,
etc. affecting water which have been introduced in the California
Legislature.
ORDINANCE NO, 1820: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1820 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
-
I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1798 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-36. (R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1820
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUI\C I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1820 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOQ 1821: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1821 for final reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1786 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-120. (C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1821 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1821 duly passed and adopted.
JOB NO. 722. LA PALMA RECREATION BUILDING - CHANGE OF SUB-CONTRACTOR: Mr.
Murdoch submitted request from Clifford Fessler, General Contractor for the
La Palma Park Recreation Building, Job No. 722, for change in plumbing
subcontractor from Rodriguez Plumbing to Max Warren Plumbing Company,
Covina, California, together with recommendation of the City Engineer for
approval.
On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein
moved said substitutlon of plumbing subcontractor be granted; that this
action does not include in any manner, approval for an extension of time.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
JOB NO. 4600 - ITEM 5_ CHANGE ORDER NO.5 (POLICE FACILITY BUILDING): On the
recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that Item No. 5
of Change Order No.5, in the amount of $429.27, authorizing the installa-
tion of alarm system on Doors Nos. 1 and 2 in the Police Facility Building,
Job No. 4600, be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
~~'~;~;';';"~',..,,"i4,;i,,,;,~..b,,,..-''"W"
6535
City Hall_ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
INVITATION: Mr. Douglas Ogden, Director of Finance, ~xt~nded to the members
of th~ Council and their wives an invitation to attend the Municipal Finance
Officers Association of Southern California bi-monthly meeting on March 15,
1963, 7:00 P.M. at the Charter House, Anaheim being the host city.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS - CHARTER CITY COMMITTEE: On the recommendation of the City
Man@ger, Councilman Dutton moved transfer of funds in the amount of
$8,275. from the Contingency Fund to the Miscellaneous Fund, to Cov~r the
Charter City Government Committee budget for the balance of this fiscal
year, be authorized. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application by Ilse and Richard Pech
for new Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, for lIse's European Delicatessen,
1252 South Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim (C-l Zoning), was presented by the
City Manager 'to the City Council for their information. No Council action
was taken on said application.
RESOLUTION NO" 63R-173: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-173 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXEC~fION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH
GOLDEN WEST BASEBALL COMPANY FOR THE LEASING OF LA P ALMA BASEBALL FIELD
AND THE BASEBALL FIELD IN THE CITY PARK LOCATED AT VERMONT AND STATE
COLLEGE BOULEVARD, FOR PRACTICE AND THE HOLDING OF EXHIBITION BASEBALL
GAMES.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-173 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO," 63R-174: Pursuant to the request of Robert W. MacMahon, Attorney
for the Lutheran Home Association of California, Councilman Dutton offered
Resolution No. 63R-174 for adoption, setting a date for public hearing on
proposed abandonment of an easement on property which will be utilized in
the expansion of the Lutheran Home at Ball Road and Walnut Street.
Because of a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Schutte
withdrew from action on this issue.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY;
FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF
NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (March 26, 1963,
3: 00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, ChandlQr, Krsin ~nd Ccon~.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSTAINED FROM VOTING: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-174 duly passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Schutte, preparation of a certificate of "appreciation for
Albert Marcoux was authorized in recognition of his four years' service
on the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
."~"""~~""O',"=_',,'A"""""''''''''~'';~''',''''''~'_d''
''''"''~''''
6536
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5, 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RECESS = Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7;00 P.M. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:20 P.M.)
AfTER RECESS: 7:00 P.M. Mayor Coons called the meGting to order, all members
of the Council being present.
INVOCATION:
Rev. Walter Vernon, Pastor of the First Congregational Church
of AnahGim, gave the invocation.
-
FLAG SALUTE= Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
PROCLAMATION - CIVIL DEFENSE WEEK: Mr. Dave Calef, Chairman, Anaheim Civil
Def~nse Committee, addressed the Council advising of the CommitteeVs
activities In prepararion of the Second Annual Civil DefGnse Week, and
presented their six day program plan of activities for the period of March
11 - 16, 1963, for approval by the City Council. Said plans for Civil
Defense Week were set forth in full in communication dated March 4, 1963,
which Mr. Calef presented at open meeting.
Mr. Calef invited the Council to attend the Citizens Civil
Defense Committee meeting March 13, 1963, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers.
(Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 7:04 P.M.)
Mayor Coons stated he has signed a proclamation designating
March 11 throGgh 16, 19t3, as Civil Defense Week.
Mr. Mart n, Vlce Chairman of Civil Defense Committee and Publicity
Chairman for Civ:l Defense Week, stated it has been his pleasure to receive
many letters of praise and commendation from the following elected and
appointed public officials, and presented said letters to the City Council:
Steuart L. Pittman, Assistant Secretary of Defense
John Upsher Smith, Acting Regional Director, Office of Civil
Defense, Department of Defense
Hon. EdmLnd G. Brown, Governor, State of California
Allan K. Jonas, Director, State of California Disaster Office
Thomas H. Kuchel, United States Senator
Clair Engle, United States Senator
Chet Holifield, Representative from the 19th District
It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that the program of activities for the six days of Civil Defense Week, as
submitted by Mr. Calef, oe approved. MOTION CARRIED.
(Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 7:09 P.M.)
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-54 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 342: Submitted by
Stanton Nursery, Inc., requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-2 and
construction of a planned unit development on property located on the
south side of Ball Road, between Fremont Street and the Anaheim City Limits.
Public hearing was closed at the meeting of February 19, 1963 and Council
action deferred to this date for consideration of revised plans.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, addressed
the Council requesting an additional three week continuanGe~ with the pro-
vision that if the revised plans are not filed with the City within two
weeks, a letter of withdrawal will be submitted.
Councilman Schutte moved that Council action on Reclassification
No. t2-63-54 and Conditional Use Permit No. 342, be deferred to March 26,
1963, 7:00 P.M., and in accordance with the stipulation of Mr. Knisely,
that eIther said revised plans or a letter of withdrawal be in the City
Clerkvs office on or before March 15, 1963. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
~-"~;~""",."."";.,..?'",'ii'""":",~',;,,,,,~,;:,"b-"c'-'-'.
6537
City Hall. Anaheim. California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M.
PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 355: Submitted by Dorothy Antes,
Owner, requesting permission to operate a dance instruction studio and a
hofbrau on C-l property located at 424 and 428 North State College Boule-
vard.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
621, Series i962~b3, denied said Conditional Use Permit.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by Mrs. Dorothy Antes.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property
and summarIzed th,e evidence presented to the City Planning Commission
resulting Ln their denial of subject application; that the proposed use
wOLld not be compatible with the single family development abutting to
the East.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the City Council.
Mr. Charles Antes, 2021 Blanchard, advised that the proposed
dance st~dlO is represented by Mro Fred Astaire; that dancing will be
~a~ght to ad s only during morning, afternoon or evening classes,
however ~here wIll be only two dance instructors as the classes will be
small due to t~e size of the butlding. The proposed studio would serve
the AnaheIm resIdents who are driving to the Fred Astaire Studio in
Garderl Grove for dancing instruction. He stated there will be no dancing
parties, and the evening classes will be closed by approximately 10:OO P.M.
He advised that the buildinq was soundproofed when constructed, and he was
of t~e opinion that residences immediately to the rear would not be dis-
~~rbed by any sounds from tne dance studio. He called attention to the
exist~ng chlldrenvs dance studio and the pizza restaurant directly to the
So~th of SUbject property.
Regarding the requested hofbrau, Councilman Chandler advised
that Decause of the close proximity of the church across the street, the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board granted the adjacent pizza parlor a
very restricted and limited license, allowing only the serving of beer
from a cold box to people who are eating in the restaurant; that because
the property ~nder consideratIon is even closer to the church, he was
of the OplIlion the applicant would have difficulty in obtaining even a
limIted license from the A.B.C. Board.
Mr. Harry Stephenson~ 1319 Roberta, Fullerton, proposed operator
of the hofbra~, addressed the Council, and because of the evidence just
sUbmitted, req~ested the Council consider only the dancing studio to be
operated Mr. Antes.
Mr. John Craven, 1423 South Redwood Place, immediately behind the
build~ng in question, addressed the Cou~il in opposition, being of the
opinion that the commercial building was not soundproofed, and therefore
felt the mLsic emitting from the studio during the evening hours would
dist~rb the adjacent residences, his rear wall being only eight inches
from~he east wall of the commercial structure. Also, he wished to
express to the Co~ncil that the building of this structure within eight
inches of h~s block wall has created a safety hazard to children over
which he has no control.
Mr. Craven questioned the sufficiency of the twelve parking
spaces provided for this structure, which will house five separate enter-
prises. He stated that there are twenty children who live in the adjacent
residential neighborhood~ and urged denial of the requested dancing studio
and hofbrau as a nuisance and disturbance to the neighborhood.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Council and it was noted
that on the plans and drawings there was no technical evidence that the
building was soundproofed.
"'~'-'_"f""","'.,.4",..._.,.".":...'ii.;i'__~,,,,...: .17
6538
City Hall~ Anaheim_ California ,-, COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Reverend Walter Vernon, 711 Grafton Place, minister of the First
Congregational Church of Anaheim, located at 516 North State College Boule-
vard9 addressed the Council in opposition to said request, advising that
his church has been lOGated on this site for the past five years, and they
are presentl carrying on a complete program of religious activity, includ-
ing youth activities and many mid-week activities. He was of the opinion
that the esiabllshment of the hofbrau and dancing studio within such close
proximity to the urch would be incompatible with the churchvs program and
to the COmm)IH
;~e Mayor asked f anyone else wished to address the Council,
there beIng no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R'-175: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-175
for adopcloL, ~_-phold:l:-19 the Ci Planning Commission's findings and denying
CondItional Use Permit No. 355.
Refer Lo ResolutIon Book.
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 355.
o~ rOl ~al the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the fo ~owing vote:'
AYES:
NOES:
ABS EN~- :
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COljNC -LLMEN:
D~tton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor de ared Resolutlon No. 63R-l75 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASS:iF ICATION NO~ 62-63<-65 : Submitted by Nell 01 son, Owner,
Richard L. Tom, A~,~LurLzed Agent, requesting change of zone from R-O to C-l,
property briefly described as located on the north side of Katella Avenue,
approxima~e] 375 feet west of Bayless Street (1573 West Katella Avenue).
The City Plann:ng Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 627,
Serle 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
condItions:
1. Dedication of s xty (60) feet from the monumented centerline of Katella
Avenue (40 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Katella Avenue, s~bJect to the approval of the City Engineer
and In accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of the City EngIneer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella
kvenue.
4. Provis:on of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of PGblIC Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
S.Tlme l:mitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Item Nos. 13 2 and 3.
6. Development substantlally in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
7. Provision of tree wells in the uncemented portion of the Katella Avenue
parkway abL~tin~ subJect property, plans for said landscaping to be
sJbmitted to and SUbject to the approval of the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final
Building Inspection.
8. Installation of a six (6) foot strip of landscaping as indicated on
ExhIbit No.2, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject
to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said
landscaping to De installed prior to Flnal Building Inspection.
9. Installation of a sIx (6) foot masonry wall along the north property
ine, prior to Final BUllding Inspection.
10. Time limItation of three years for the abatement of the non-conforming
I'es:dent ;_dl ~se Gf aii eXistinej re.;idencp on s-uDject property subject to
review and renewal upon the expiration of said time limitation and further
provided that plans for any commercial use of the existing residence
snaIl be suoject to the approval of Development Review.
D.;i,'&>;~'--"'---'-i~
6539
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Kreidt noted on the sectional map the location of the property
and existing uses in the immediate area. He briefly summarized the evidence
submitted to the City Planning Commission, and called attention to Condition
No. 10.
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Kreidt advised that because
of the small size of the area involved, the specific uses in the area are
not projected on the Preliminary General Plan.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. Tom, Authorized Agent, was present.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in
opposition to the application.
Mr. R. D. Crowl, 1570 West Katella Avenue (across the street from
subject property), advised that he spoke for himself and his neighbors,
Cliff and Hall.
He stated that many have endeavored to secure C-l zoning in the
area, however, the closest commercial building in the area is at the inter-
sectIon of Euclid Street and Katella Avenue. He advised that the Hall
Academy has not been In existence for over a year, and that the nursery use
is by Special Use Permit~ which requires that the appearance of the building
remalnLhe same. Further, the variance granted to Tietz Construction Company
on the property west of his property was also with the requirement that the
bciIding remain the same in appearance. He stated that the variance granted
to Tietz Construction Company also required the driveway and the rear yard
be blacktopped for parking; however this condition was not met, and a parking
and traffic problem has resulted.
Mr. Crowl further called attention to the fact that all the homes
on the north side of the street set back approximately 200 feet, and that
the commercial bJilding would be extending beyond these homes in the front
yard area.
Mr. Richard L. Tom, Architect and Authorized Agent, 1665 West
Katella Avenue, stated in his opinion, from a professional standpoint, the
requested use was in line with sensible planning. He was of the opinion
that Anaheim was endeavoring to discourage and eliminate the establishment
of businesses in existing residences. He called attention to the design
of the proposed building, noting that ample parking is provided in the rear
of the beilding.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council relative to permitting
an eXIstIng residential use on a parcel of commercially zoned property, con-
trary to the Anaheim Municipal Code prohibiting residential use in a commer-
cial zone. Also considered, was the size and depth of the subject parcel
and the existing relatively new residence on the property.
In answer to Council inquiry, Mr. Kreidt further explained the
thinking of the City Planning Commission in establishing Condition No. 10,
that because of the depth of the lot, it was the feeling of the Commission
that residential use for a limited period of time would not be detrimental,
as a commercial building would be an asset to the area and would be fronting
the residence; however, it was not the intention of the Planning Commission
to permit the establishment of residential-commercial use of existing resi-
dence.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton offered
a resolution authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
~,,,,,_.-,,,,~~.,,,",,,,,,..,,,,,,...,.....,.=.,:,,,..;,,~~,.\,,.,,.,---.-
....-.r
6540
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution failed to carry by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNe I LMEN :
Dutton and Krein.
Chandler, Schutte and Coons.
None.
Mayor Coons declared the foregoing resolution failed to carry.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R'=176: Further discussion was held concerning Condition
No. 10 established by the City Planning Commission. At the conclusion
thereof, CouncIlman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-176 for adoption,
authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as request~d,
subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending
Condition No. 10 thereof to read, "No combination of residential and commer-
cIal use of the existing residential building be permitted; however, if
commercial use of the existing building is desired, said building must be
remodeled to commercial standards, plans for said remodeling to be submitted
to and approved by the Development Review Board."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62,-63-65 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES~
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-176 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-66 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 362:
Submitted by Roger WQ Pannier, Owner, Mort Green, Authorized Agent, request-
ing change of zone from R-A to R-3, to permit the establishment of a two-
story planned unit mGltiple family residential development on property
brIefly described as located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Euclid
Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 628,
Series 1962-63 recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
condItions:
1. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Palm Lane, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of
the City Engineer.
2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Ball Road and Euclid Street in
accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the
City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball
Road, Euclid Street and Palm Lane, or installation of street lights on
Ball Road, Euclid Street and Palm Lane, in accordance with a street
lighting plan approved by the Director of Public Utilities.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 PQr dWQlling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
6. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City
of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection.
7. Access drives shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width with adequ~e angle
cut-offs provided, or a minimum of 28 feet in width if no cut-offs are
provided and, in all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clearance of
14 feet.
8. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 362.
~~...."1
~
'!
6541
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
10. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. I through 6,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 362 requesting permission to construct
a two-story planned unit multiple family residential development; waive
one-story height limitation, and permit carports in lieu of garages on
property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 629,
Series 1960-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the
reclassification of the subject property to the R-3 Multiple Family
Residential Zone, approved under petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-66.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the
evidence considered by the City Planning Commission resulting in their
recommended approval. He advised that a written statement was submitted
by the applicant, outlining the plans for the proposed development. Said
plans were considered by the Planning Commission to be very good.
Discussion was held concerning the preservation of the palm
trees along Palm Lane, and reference was made to former R-3 and C-I
application, Reclassification No. 57-58-25, on which a Resolution of
Intention was adopted. Mayor Coons reported that with the former appli-
cation an englneering drawing was prepared, allowing for the preservation
of the palm trees.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. Webb, of Don Lee Land Company, representing Mr. Pannier and
the developer, addressed the Council advising that the developer has revised
the plot plan in order to preserve the palm trees and in so doing, twelve
units have been omitted from the plan.
Mr. Frank D. Morris, Architect, advised that the reVISIon of the
plans was worked out with the City departments, and the only trees now in
question were the last twelve trees on Palm Lane at Euclid, and this was
because of the grade level at this point.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-177: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-177
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission, with the following amendments:
Condition No.1 - to read: "Preparation of street improvement
plans and installation of all improvements for Palm Lane, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard
plans on file in the nffice of the City Engineer, as revised to provide for
the retention of the palm trees."
Condition No. 2 - to read: "Installation of sidewalks and drive-
ways on Ball Road and Euclid Street, in accordance with the adopted standard
plans on file in the office of the City Engineer, as revised to provide for
the retention of the palm trees, prior to Final Building Inspection."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-66 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
-'"'~~"-"=_1I;,,,,,,,:,,-t,.,..c;;;...__,:;;.:;__._ __'''-..':-._-'~__..;_~.o.' W
6542
City Hall, Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
A YES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUI\C I LMEN :
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-177 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-178: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-178
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 362, subject to the follow-
Ing conditions: ~
1. Subject to the completion of reclassification of the subject property to
the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone, approved under petition for
Reclassification No. 62-63-66.
2. Waiver of height limitations along the easterly and southerly boundaries
of subject property.
3. Installation of carports in lieu of garages, with the provision that the
interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed, that enclosed
storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport,
and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior
wall of the proposed carports from damage, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 362.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYE S:
NOES:
ABSENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-178 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-67 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 363:
Submitted by Ralph A. and Liboria J. Ringo, Owners; Robert Kramer, Authorized
Agent, concerning property located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and
Dale Avenue. (2801 Ball Road).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-67 requesting the following change of.
zone: Portion "A", the north 193 feet, from R-A to R-3; Portion "B", the
south 173 feet, from R-A to C-l.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 630,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Dedication of fifty-three (52) feet from the monumented centerline of
Ball Road (30 feet existing).
2. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of
Dale Avenue (25 feet existing)
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Ball Road and Dale Avenue, subject to the approval of the
City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on
file in the office of the City Engineer.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for ~treet lighting purposes on Ball
Road and Dale Avenue.
5. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
6. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
7. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 363.
8. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac at the terminus of Elmlawn Drive,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
9. Installation of drainage facilities subject to the approval of the City
Engineer for Ball Road and Dale Avenue, in accordance with adopted
standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
~~;:;:;':;'-0~,,~";,,~';~h-,~,"a,,;_ '~----y
6543
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
10. Time limltation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 and II.
11. Dedication and improvement of a twenty (20) foot alley as indicated
on Exhibit No.1, and as required in Condition No. 12.
12. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2,
provided that revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Depart-
ment for Development Review, prior to the public hearing before the
City Council, said revision incorporating the provision of a dedicated
alley, as shown on Exhibit No.1, from the abutting property line to
the West, to align with the proposed alley south of the single family
development to the west of subject property, and extending easterly to
Dale Avenue to separate the proposed multiple family residential
development from the proposed neighborhood commercial development to
the South.
13. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the southerly boundary
of the alley along the northerly edge of the C-l, Neighborhood Commer-
cial zoned property to separate the commercial development from the
multiple family residential development, and to permit residential use
of the dedicated alley only, prior to Final Building Inspection,
14. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly property
line to separate the proposed multiple family residential development
from the single family development to the West, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
15. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly property
line to separate the proposed neighborhhocd commercial development from
the proj ected mul tipl e f amil y development to the we st of subj ect
property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
16. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of the Dale Avenue and Ball Road frontages of subject property,
plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said land-
scaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
17. Installation of a six (6) foot strip of landscaping as shown on
Exhibit No.1, separating the proposed neighborhood commercial property
from the proposed service station on the easterly portion of the pro-
posed C-I, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 363, requesting the following: Portion
"A", construct a two-story planned unit multiple family residential develop-
ment, waive one-story height limitation; Portion "B", construct a commercial
building and a service station.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 631,
Series 1962-63, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 363, subject to the
following:
1. Subject to the reclassification of the subject property to the R-3,
Multiple Family Residential Zone for Parcel "A" and C-l, Neighborhood
Commercial, Zone for Parcel "B", as approved under Petition for Reclassi-
fication No. 62-63-67.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of the property and the
existing zoning in the area. He summarized the evidence submitted to and
considered by the City Planning Commission as noted in the City Planning
Commission minutes, resulting in their recommended approval of both
applications.
Mr. Kreidt called attention to Condition No.1?, and advised
that plans marked "Revision No.1" in compliance with said condition have
been checked by the Planning Department.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. Robert Kramer, 115 South Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles,
California, Authorized Agent, advised that they have met practically all
the requirements set forth by the City Planning Commission. and further
advised that the R-3 development is 150 feet east of the single family
,,,,",,, '~'~"".A.c..'",;,.'" -w-
6544
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
residential development to the West. He stated that a wall will be con-
structed between the BuddmstChurch and the R-3 development, and an alley
will separate the commercial and R-3 development.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and report of
the Planning Department noted.
.......,
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-179: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-179
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission, with the following amendments:
11. Dedication and improvement of a twenty (20) foot alley as indicated
on Exhibit "A", Revision No.1, and as required in Condition No. 12.
12. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit "A", Revision No.
1, approved by the City Council and signed by the Mayor this date, and
Exhibit No.2.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-67 - R-3 and C-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-179 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-180: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-180
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 363, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. Subject to the completion of reclassification of the subject property to
R-3, Multiple Family Residential zone, for Parcel "A" and C-l, Neighbor-
hood Commercial Zone, for Parcel "B" as approved under Petition for
Reclassification No. 62-63-67.
2. Waiver of height limitation in accordance with plans marked Exhibit "A",
Revision No. I, and Exhibit 2, to allow construction of two-story
development along Dale Avenue.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 363.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUN::; I LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte9 Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-180 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-68 AND VARIANCE NO. 1548: Submitted
by Hemlock Terrace, Inc., Owners; Ray Hufford, Authorized Agent, requesting
change of zone from R-A and R-l to R-l; property located on the north side
of Hilda Street cul-de-sac, south of Wagner Avenue.
Variance No. 1548: (1) Create lot on cul-de-sac with less than
60 feet width at setback.
~~'''"*"~'''',,,'''<C\f<'"'I<!;..~<>:,,.;-;:.-,";'
6545
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
(2) Construct garage less than 8 feet from
main building.
(3) Create R-A parcels less than one acre.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
632, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Dedication to complete the existing cul-de-sac with a radius of fifty
(50) feet.
2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Hilda Street in accordance
with the 3dopted standard plans on file in the office of the City
Engineer.
3. Dedication of all access rights to Wagner Avenue to be dedicated to the
City of Anaheim.
4. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
5. Provision that any revised plans for the development of subject property
shall be submitted to and approved by the Development Review Function.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 633,
Series 1962-63, denied said variance application.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property to the
adjacent residential Tract No. 4030 (originally recorded in the County). He
briefed the findings of the City Planning Commission resulting in their
recommended approval of the requested R-l zoning, however denying the variance
for the lot split in the manner proposed, and further recommending that all
access rights to Wagner Avenue also be denied.
Mr. Kreidt advised that the intent of the applicant was to combine
the lot marked "Not a Part" with Lot A of Tract No. 4030, and then re-divide
the property to allow construction of an approximately 1,800 square foot
home on the eastern portion, and maintain the existing older residence on
the remaining portion. That the State has granted the applicant indefinite
access rights to Wagner Avenue.
Communication dated February 21, 1963, from Hemlock Terrace, Inc.,
Delby E. Walton, Vice President, requesting amendment to certain requirements
imposed by the City Planning Commission, was submitted and copies furnished
each Councilman.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Council, and it was noted
that the property in question could possibly be divided into two parcels of
approximately 9,625 square feet each, with a variance for the lot frontage
on the Hilda Street cul-de-sac.
Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, advised that their department inves-
tigated the possibility of access onto Wagner Avenue from the property in
question, and found that there would be r~quired a ramp approximately
eight and one-half feet deep in order to get onto the future Wagner Street
grade from this lot; this would mean that a ramp from the lot would have to
go 115 feet at a nine per cent grade, back southerly into the lot; this
would create a mound of earth in variable depth, a maximum of about eight to
eight and one-half feet, at the east edge of the lot, because the house is
on the westerly portion.
Mr. Maddox came forward to the Council Table and discussion was
held regarding the lot split map submitted.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Delby Walton, Vice President, Hemlock Terrace, stated he had
nothing to add other than what was contained in his letter of February 21,
1963.
Mayor Coons asked Mr. Walton, in the interest of the entire sub-
division, would it not be better to consider combining the lot marked "Not
a Part" and Lot A of Tract No. 3040, and then divide the property equally
into two lots, with equal frontage on the cUl-de-sac, and two new homes
built comparable to the homes in the ares.
..""""~~-.."'"
6546
Citv Hall. Anaheim. California -COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Walton replied that he felt this would be the best solution
if waiver of the minimum lot frontage requirements could be obtained.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Wilbur Holmes, 991 Hilda Street, adjacent to subject property,
addressed the Council in oPPosition, being of the opinion that to divide
sUbject property into two equal R-l lots would result in misrepresentation
at the time they purchased their homes; that all of the home owners on the
cul-de-sac were advised at the time of purchase that sUbject property
would remain as one large R-l lot; that if the surrounding subdivision
development now makes this lot appear too large for single family develop-
ment, this fact should have been considered at the time of the original
tract development.
Mayor Coons suggested that this matter be continued to allow Mr.
Walton to meet with the City Engineer to layout a lot split that would be
equal and fair with houses of the same quality and design as the remainder
of the subdivision.
Mr. C. W. Mauritz, 2616 Maverick, was of the oplnlon the subdivider
should submit to the home owners a precise plan of what is intended for
subject property, prior to final action by the City Council.
Mr. William Franzen, 996 Hilda Street, spoKe in opposition to
the lot split, advising that everyone was told at the time of purchase
that subject property would be developed with a single family home.
Mr. T. M. Croxton, 990 Hilda Street, addressed the Council in
opposition, and was of the opinion that to place two lot frontages on the
cul-de-sac would result in a maze of driveways and also, the homes would be
set back behind the existing homes, which would destroy the aesthetic
appearance of their cul-de-sac.
Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No.
62-63-68 and Variance No. 1548.
At the conclusion of further discussion by the City Council,
Councilman Krein moved that action on said application be deferred to
April 2, 1963,7:00 P.M., to allow for the submission of plans and proposal
incorporating equal lot division after combining the two parcels, with
construction of two new homes. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
The applicant was also requested to submit an exact description
of the two separate parcels, together with a combined description, so, if
approved, a record of survey could be filed. Also, it was suggested to
the applicant that the new proposal and drawings be submitted to the resi-
dents on Hilda Street for review.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 9:11 P.M.
,~C) -
SIGNED:{~ ~. )~~
City Clerk
~~f,.''''''#:i^~'''''.,~.~,';+;A\;