1963/05/07
6692
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 30. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
DYKE WATER COMPANY - ACQUISITION OF FACILITIES: Mr. Geisler reported on the
status of the Dyke Water Company facility purchase, advising that the
Public Utilities Commission has rendered a temporary order in connection
with the Dyke Water Company, and the order is such that it restricts the
City of Anaheim from completing the purchase pending further hearings.
Discussion was held by the City Council, City Manager, and
City Attorney; at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, that the City Attorney be authorized
to prepare necessary briefs and file necessary action in the State Supreme
Court concerning the City of Anaheim vs. Dyke Water Company, and that
necessary funds for said action be approved. MOTION CARRIED.
It was further determined that continued efforts be made to
convince the Public Utilities Commission that there is a much greater
public interest involved here in the water conservation field from what
has been presently recognized, as this involves the entire North Orange
County basin, which is a vital concern to everyone in Orange County.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: (8:45 P.M.)
SIGNED:~.4CL.: k 4J ~ .~~
Ci ty Clerk
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler (entered the meeting, 3:50 P.M.),
Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Councilman Krein moved that minutes of the Anaheim City Council meet-
ing held April 23, 1963, be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED MOTEL-HOTEL ROOM TAX: Mayor Coons briefly reviewed the discussion
held at the City Council meeting of April 30, 1963, regarding the proposed
Ordinance establishing a motel-hotel business license room occupancy tax
of four per cent, and advised that suggestions offered at said meeting have
been considered and fully discussed by the City Council, City Manager and
City Attorney.
Regarding the suggestion that such a tax be levied only during
the three or four months of the tourist season, it was determined that a
severe administrative problem on the Department of Finance would be created.
The Mayor further reported that, in reference to the other suggestion that
levying the tax to those motels in the Disneyland area only, arbitrary
boundaries would necessarily be created, thereby causing probable objections
from those businesses on the fringe of established boundaries. After con-
sidering all arguments presented, the City Council felt that this room
occupancy business license tax seemed to be the standard means by which to
obtain monies for the construction of a multi-purpose convention, exhibit-
type faCility, such as the one proposed, and would be the best fair-share
method of collecting said funds from that segment of the economy. For the
benefit of the greatest public interest, the City Council believes that the
II
6693
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
benefits derived from a municipal auditorium or convention hall facility
will off-set any harm that those businesses on the so-called fringe area
feel might OCCur as result of the four per cent tax.
Mayor Coons further stated that another factor to be considered
was that a comparison of the total tax rates between Anaheim and commun-
ities adjacent to Beach Boulevard will prove that the four per cent paid
by users of rooms will not increase total taxes paid by motel ~nd hotel
facilities to a higher rate than those paid in these other communities.
He advised that it was his personal belief, after considering all the
objections and considering what would be the greatest public interest as
a whole, that the proposed Ordinance should be adopted.
The Mayor asked if other members of the Council wished to
express their individual opinions.
Councilman Dutton stated that although he could appreciate the
fact that there would be a certain nuisance factor connected with collec-
tion of the four per cent tax, he felt that the bolstering of economy in
the City, which certainly a Convention facility will do, would be worth
the small amount of trouble incurred in collecting and accounting for such
a tax; that he was heartily in accord with the adoption of the proposed
Ordinance.
Councilman Krein was of the oplnlon that the need for the Conven-
tion Hall facility is shared by hotel and motel owners along with most
citizens. He further advised that the City has an opportunity to procure
a location on which to build such a facility, and any property under
consideration will increase in price the longer the action is postponed.
He further was of the opinion that some of the objectors to the proposed
tax were not taking into consideration the value, or additional revenue,
that will come to them through the use of this facility and the additional
people it will bring to Anaheim. He added that he was in agreement with
Mayor Coons and Councilman Dutton's remarks, and favors the establishment
of said tax.
Councilman Schutte advised that although he has previously stated
an opinion that he disliked imposing the same amount of tax on businesses
located as much as five miles away from the convention hall activities and
the Disneyland area as charged to those close by, he felt after exploring
all other possibilities and discussing all factors involved, that this
method of financing such a facility was the best for the City of Anaheim,
and he was no longer opposed to the Ordinance. He noted that the Steering
Committee recommending this course of action was appointed during his
tenure of Mayor; that they gave the matter thorough study, exploring all
possibilities, resulting in the best recommendation that they could make.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone present wished to offer any comments.
Mr. Ben Rochelle, Americana Motel, 130 South Beach Boulevard,
advised of his present critical financial position relative to the operation
of the motel, that his motel is in competition with 600 motel rooms approxi-
mately one mile north in the City of Buena Park, where no room tax will be
charged; that Anaheim, although a fast growing city, has more motel rooms
available now than are needed, and still more under construction. He was
of the opinion that to establish the proposed tax on the few that can
hardly afford to pay it was neither equitable nor fair. He stated that
their room rates were considerably lower than facilities in the amusement
area, and that during a convention their occupancy was approximately 25%,
compared to the 95% enjoyed in those motels close to Disneyland.
Mr. Rochelle further stated that if the Ordinance is adopted, he
would have to absorb the 4% tax himself, rather than charge his customers,
and further felt that other commercial business, such as service stations
and stores, would derive benefits from the convention hall facility at the
expense of the motel owner.
The Mayor asked if anyone had any additional remarks to offer;
there was no response.
6694
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1848: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1848 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.44 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION TO BE NUMBERED
3.44.030.
(Said Ordinance was read in full at the City Council meeting held
April 30, 1963.)
~
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1848 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-352 - ABANDONMENT. VERMONT STREET PROLONGATION: Public
hearing was held April 23, 1963, on proposed abandonment of the Vermont
Street prolongation west of West Street, at which time the City Council
indicated approval of the proposed abandonment, however withheld further
action to allow the City Engineer and the property owner time to resolve
details concerning modification of the Vermont Street termination.
The City Clerk reported that a bond in the amount of $350.00 for
the construction of street improvements and installation of a modified
cul-de-sac, has been received.
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-352 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY
PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Chandler.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-352 duly passed and adopted.
SIGN REQUEST - l020 EUCLID STREET: Application submitted by Alpha Beta Acme
Markets, Inc., requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign (oversize)
advertising the Alpha Beta Market, 1020 Euclid Street, together with plans,
was reviewed by the City Council and report from the Building Department
noted.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said
sign request was granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-65 - REVIEW OF PLANS: Request of Richard L. Tom,
A.I.A., for Council approval of proposed lot split on property located at
1573 West Katella Avenue (Reclassification No. 62-63-65), together with
plans for said lot split, were submitted.
Mr. Geisler, City Attorney, reviewed past action on subject
property, and recommended C-I Zoning on the entire parcel; and further
recommended a commercial lot split. The front portion can then be developed
for a commercial use as a separate parcel, and the rear portion where the
residence exists can continue as a non-conforming use until such time as it
is converted to commercial use. At that time, the existing residence must
be brought up to commercial standards and plans therefor reviewed and
approved by the City Council.
Mr. Tom presented plans, which were reviewed at the Council Table.
4~~"',"",,,Lc",,,""'7';"~".-"~'_'--'~';;'-'U_~",,;,"<,,_,,,,~, T
-,~" lIi"liiM""' . I I 'm
6695
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton
moved that the lot split of the property be approved, as shown on the plans
submitted. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Plans were dated and signed "for lot split only" by Mayor Coons.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 58-59-31 - REVIEW OF PLANS: Request of Mr. Harry Knisely
for Council review of plans for development of commercial property located
at the northeast Corner of Euclid Street and Romneya Drive (Reclassification
No. 58-59-31) was submitted.
Mr. Knisely, Attorney for the applicant, advised that the plans
as submitted were not complete, and noted that the original resolution of
intent to rezone subject property limited the use to business and profes-
sional offices, therefore, attached to the plans is a list of possible uses
on which Council approval is requested so that plans can be finalized at a
later date.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council together with list of
proposed commercial uses, which are the following:
Abby Rents
Barber Shop - Beauty Shop
Cleaners
Camera Shop
Delicatessen
Bakery
Florist
Hardware
Drugstore - Pharmacy
Optometrist
Medical
EmploYment Agency
Music Store
Restaurant
Stationery - Greeting Card - Gift and School Supplies
Real Estate
Shoe Repairs
Uniform Shop
Business and Professional Offices.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
the term "business and professional" use as required under Resolution No.
4989 was interpreted by the City Council to include the uses listed by
Mr. Knisely. MOTION CARRIED.
Plans including list of uses were dated and signed this date by
Mayor Coons.
RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62-63-2 - REQUEST: Request of M.R.C. Developers to post
bond in lieu of block wall construction along the south property line at
1145 North West Street (Reclassification No. 62-63-2 - Parcel 3) was
submitted.
The City Manager reported that right-of-way has been acquired,
and street improvement bond posted; however, said bond did not include the
wall requirement.
Mr. Carl Templin, representing Miller Investment Company, advised
that a bond has been posted for construction of the six foot wall along the
easterly 174 feet of the north property line of subject property.
He further advised that they originally intended to construct
patios at the rear of the building, but later determined that this would be
to no avail, as there was no access to them. Further, the adjacent property
to the South is presently in the process of rezoning to R-3. Because con-
ditions of reclassification of this property to the South have not yet been
met, request to post bond in lieu of wall construction on the south property
line is made.
6696
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman SChutte,
the applicantVs request was granted and bond permitted to be posted in lieu
of wall construction on the south property line of Parcel 3, Reclassifica-
tion No. 62-63-2; the expiration date of said bond to be concurrent with
the existing bond posted for Reclassification No. 62-63-2 (December 19~ 1964).
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-11 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Robert Clagett,
A.I.A., dated April 25, 1963, for one year extension of time to bond posted
for engineering requirements on Reclassification No. 60-61-11, was submitted.
The City Manager reviewed past extensions granted, and reported
right-of-way has been acquired.
Said request was granted, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded
by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-77 - REQUEST: Request of Mr. Ray Mercado, Agent for
James L. Sloan, for waiver of six month waiting period to re-file application
for rezoning on property located at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue
and Acacia Street (Reclassification No. 62-63-77), was submitted.
Mayor Coons reviewed past actions on subject reclassification,
wherein R-3 zoning was denied, and limited C-l zoning application was also
denied at a later date, and the property deemed not to be compatible for
any type of commercial. The applicant now requests permission to re-file
for a limited medical center and pharmacy.
Mr. Ray Mercado, 13016 Euclid Street, Garden Grove, advised that
Mr. Sloan had obtained signatures of many property owners in the area in
favor of the proposed use for his property, and in his opinion, the only
objection, other than the possibility of "spot zoning", was that the
property was requested for C-l Zoning with no controls. He was of the
opinion that re-filing application for a limited zoning specifically for a
medical suite development would overcome the objections previously made.
He referred to the R-3 development in the area, service stations and
schools, and was of the opinion that this area could sponsor the improve-
ment proposed by Mr. Sloan, and requested favorable consideration of the
requested time limit waiver.
Mr. James L. Sloan, owner of the property, advised that the petition
in favor of medical center use of his property was signed by 97 per cent of
the residents in the neighborhood. It was his opinion that there is a need
for such a facility on the east side of the city.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that requested waiver of six months' waiting
period for re-filing zoning application on subject property be granted, to
allow an application to be filed for a limited type of operation as expressed
in the letter from Mr. Mercado. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP_ TRACT NO. 4960: Subdivider, Bryan Industries; tract located on the
east side of Lemon Street, 540 feet north of Orangethorpe Avenue, and
contains 11, M-l lots.
Assistant City Engineer Ralph Pease reported said Final Map
conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that
bonds have been posted and approved, and required fees paid, and recommended
approval of Final Map, Tract No. 4960.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton
moved Final Map of Tract No. 4960 be approved. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP_ TRACT NO. 5081: Subdivider, V. J. Shrader; tract located on the west
side of Sunkist, 350 feet north of Lincoln Avenue, and contains 83, R-I lots.
1-,-"'!7
----:
6697
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Pease reported that said Final Map conforms substantially
with the tentative map previously approved; that bonds have been posted
and required fees paid, and recommended approval of Final Map, Tract No.
5081.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein
moved Final Map of Tract No. 5081 be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 3:50 P.M.)
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5141: Subdivider, Russell Jay; property located on the
west side of Beach Boulevard, south of Lincoln Avenue, and contains 42,
R-3 lots.
Communication received from Mr. Russell Jay, requesting Council
action on the tract be withheld to be considered in conjunction with
Reclassification No. 62-63-108, filed on sUbject property, was submitted.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
action on Tentative Map, Tract No. 5141, was continued to be considered
in conjunction with Reclassification No. 62-63-108, as requested. MOTION
CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5114: Subdivider, J & C Development Company; tract located
on the east side of Webster Avenue, approximately 257 feet south of the
centerline of OrangeAvenue, and contains 9, R-l lots.
Communication from J & C Development Company was submitted,
requesting consideration of said map in conjunction with Variance No. 1570
filed on subject property.
The City Clerk reported Variance No. 1570 will be scheduled for
Council information May 21, 1963.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
action on Tentative Map, Tract No. 5114 was deferred to be considered May
21, 1963, in conjunction with consideration of Variance No. 1570. MOTION
CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP_ TRACT NO. 5108: Subdivider, Village Green Development Company;
tract located on the east side of Dale Avenue, south of Orange Avenue, and
contains 58, R-l lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 29, 1963,
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
l. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. Streets "A" and "D" shall have a forty (40) foot roadway within the
sixty (60) feet of dedication.
3. The fifty-six (56) foot dedication and forty-eight (48) foot radius of
MacDuff Circle is acceptable with a thirty-six (36) foot roadway and a
thirty-eight (38) foot curb radius, respectively.
4. Dedication of access rights to Orange Avenue and Dale Avenue, except at
s-treet openings.
5. ConstructIon of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the property line
separating Lot Nos. 58, I through 7, 18 and 19, 30 and 31 from Dale and
Orange Avenues, except that on corner Lot Nos. 58, l, 30 and 31, said
wall shall be stepped down to 24 inches in the front one-half of the
front yard setback and a height of 42 inches in the back one-half of
said setback.
6. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities shall be installed
in the uncemented portion of the Dale and Orange Avenues parkway the full
distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and
subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and
said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
(Following the installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall
assume the responsibility for the maintenance of said landscaping.)
~~"",~"",.t,."~,~c,,....._,',,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,",,,,,,. _.~ ~... -~"'A!~;'
6698
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
7. Subdivision of all lots shall be in accordance with all requirements
of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5108, be
approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5113: Subdivider, Mount Corporation; Engineer, Voorheis-
Trindle-Nelson, Inc.; tract located on the south side of Crescent Avenue,
approximately 274 feet east of Magnolia Avenue, and contains 24, R-l lots.
~
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 29, 1963,
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. Drainage shall be handled in a manner which is acceptable to the City
Engineer.
3. Dedication of access rights to Crescent Avenue, except at street
openings.
Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5113 be
approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion.
The City Manager called attention to the excessive length of the
cul-de-sac street in the tract, and noted that on the previous tentative
map, filed in conjunction with a proposed R-3 Zoning application, an outlet
to Magnolia Avenue was provided to provide circulation and adequate drainage.
Discussion was held by the City Counci~ and the Mayor asked if a
representative of the Engineering firm was present. There was no response.
Action on said tract was withheld as Mr. Pease left the meeting to
contact the developer or engineer for the tract concerning the facts
reported by Mr. Murdoch.
Mr. Ralph Pease returned and reported that Voorheis-Trindle-Nelson,
Inc. were contacted by telephone, and requested action on Tentative Tract No.
5113 be continued one week (May 14, 1963), which request would be confirmed
by letter.
In view of the above information, Councilman Dutton withdrew his
motion to approve Tentative Map, Tract No. 51l3, and Councilman Chandler
withdrew his second to said motion.
Councilman Schutte moved that request for one week continuance
be granted. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held April 15, 1963, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOG 406 - Submitted by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons,
requesting permission to establish a private recreational facility in con-
junction with multiple family residential development located at 212 Pearson
Avenue (Tract No. 4551, south side of Pearson Avenue, east of Sprague Lane.)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 719,
Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to development
substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. land 2.
VARIANCE NOG 1563 - Submitted by William A. and Mary C. Dillow, and Clarence
and Rhea L. Meddock, requesting waiver of deed restrictions pertaining to
building material for service station; waiver of a portion of the block wall
requirement and relocation of driveway approaches previously approved under
Variance No. 1523 (Reclassification No. 58-59-4) to permit the construction
of a service station on property located at the southeast corner of Haster
Street and Katella Avenue.
6699
City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Re~olution No. 716,
Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO. 1565 - Submitted by Free Methodist Church of Anaheim, request-
ing waiver of block wall requirement on d portion of the northerly property
line on property located at 1171 North West Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 718.
Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no
further action taken on the above numbered variance and conditional use
permit applications.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-82 - AMENDMENT: Request of Mr. Jim McAnena for
clarification of Ordinance No. 1837, Condition No.1, which requires that
R-3 deed restrictions be recorded against subject property, limiting the
height to one-story construction.
The City Clerk briefed past actions on subject reclassification,
noting that Conditional Use Permit No. 333 and revised plans were approved
January 22, 1963, for two story construction on certain lots within the
planned unit development, prior to final adoption of Ordinance No. 1837.
As result, a conflict now exists concerning height limitations.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
amendment to deed restrictions filed in conjunction with Reclassification
No. 61-62-82, deleting limitation of one-story, was approved. MOTION
CARRIED..
ORDINANCE NO. l849: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1849, amending
Condition No.1 of Ordinance No. 1837, for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1837 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-82.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1837 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 379: Request of Newell Little, Economic Services,
Inc., dba Walker Oil Company, was submitted, to reduce the size of property
requested for a service station development under Conditional Use Permit No.
379, granted by Resolution No. 63R-350, and also request to permit the
posting of a bond in lieu of wall construction on the East.
Mr. Martin Kreidt advised that upon request of Councilman Krein
after the public hearing on subject property, held April 30, 1963, a check
was made to determine whether the easterly property line of subject property
is adjacent to the R-3 development, or whether in fact a parcel of land
eXlsts between the proposed service station and R-3 development.
He reported that Mr. Mercado, Engineer for Mr. Little, determined
that there is an 84.9 foot wlde strip of property between the two parcels.
If the property approved for service station use was reduced from 190 feet
to 150 feet in depth, excluding the easterly 40 feet and a bond posted
in lieu of block wall construction, it would allow the remaining 40 feet to
be considered ai a later date for ultimate development, separately or in
conjunction with the 8~.9 foot parcel between subject property and the
R-3 development to the East.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-353: Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the
conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-353, amend-
ing Resolution No. 63R-350, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 379, limiting
the service station to the westerly 150 feet of subject property, and that in
lieu of the construction of the east concrete block wall, a suitable bumper
barrier be erected at thls time, to protect the undeveloped portion to the
east of the service station; further subject to the posting of a two year
bond guaranteeing the construction of the east wall.
6700
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 63R-350, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 379.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Chandler.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-353 duly passed and adopted.
COUNTY CASE NO. 626: Correspondence from the City Planning Commission to Orange
County Planning Commission concerning Case No. 626, A-I to R-I, R-2 and C-I,
(Sectional District Map 4-6-9, Exhibit E); property located on the north
side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, opposite Peralta Hills Drive, recommending
denial of proposed rezoning, was submitted and read, and no further action
was taken by the City Council. (County Tentative Map 4427)
COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5150: Submitted by James H. Russell, property located on
the east side of Gilbert Street, approximately 245 feet south of Ball Road,
requesting permission to construct a 160 unit apartment development in the
R-l and R-2 zones.
Correspondence from the City Planning Commission to Orange County
Planning Commission concerning said use variance, recommending denial, was
submitted and read, and no further action was taken by the City Council.
COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5059: Request for modification of Conditions Nos. 2 and
4 of Use Variance No. 5059, regarding street dedication and improvements,
property located at the northeast corner of Blue Gum Street and Coronado
Street, was submitted (machine shop presently under construction).
Correspondence from the City Planning Commission to Orange County
Planning Commission, recommending a limited extension of time to Conditions
2 and 4, and that said conditions be completed prior to Final Building Inspec-
tIon, was submitted and read, and no further action taken by the City Council.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-354: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-354 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES.
(4/59th Interest - Champion Pumping Plant, south of Lincoln Avenue between
Broadway and Embassy.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-354 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-355: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-355 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (4/59th Interest - Champion Pumping Plant)
~,~-"""""","~-""'",""""",..~,":",-,,,,,-:,,-~
!
6701
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P,M,
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-355 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of one 750 KVA Transformer, as follows, and recommended
acceptance of the low bid, that of General Electric Company, in the amount
of $3,832.40:
General Electric Co., Los Angeles
Parks & Co., Long Beach
Line Material Co., Los Angeles
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Los Angeles
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles
$ 3,832.40
3,838.64
4,240.08
4,104.88
4,513.60
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler
moved that the low bid of General Electric Company be accepted and purchase
authorized in the amount of $3,832.40. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of one 1,000 KVA Transformer, as follows, and noted that
although the low bid was from General Electric Company in the amount of
$4,669.60, Parks and Company was second low bidder, and also submitted an
alternate bid for 1,500 KVA Transformer for the same price ($5,082.48),
and offered to sell three 1,500 KVA units at this price:
General Electric Co., Los Angeles
Parks & Co., Long Beach
Line Material Co., Los Angeles
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Los Angeles
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles
$ 4,669.60
5,082.48
4,940.00
5,141.76
5,605.60
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Electrical Division
and Purchasing Department, Councilman Dutton moved that the alternate bid
of Parks and Company for 1,500 KVA Transformer be accepted, and that purchase
of two of these units be authorized in the total amount of $10,164.96.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO, 63R-356 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 48l1: On the recommendations of the
City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-356 for adoption,
awarding construction of the La Palma Avenue Street Improvement, Job No.
4811, to Sully-Miller Contracting Company, the low bidder, in the amount of
$3,323.80.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 200
FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST OF
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4811. (Sul1y-
Miller Contracting Co.)
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-356 duly passed and adopted.
~"'~~"r-"'"""""""W"":':""~,:y"'::',r~';"",,,,,,"~,
~.",~~""
6702
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-357: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-357 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SANTA FE RAILROAD
STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF NORTH STREET, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 763; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.;
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened May 29,
1963, 2:00 P.M. )
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-357 duly passed and adopted.
JOB NO. 658 - CHANGE ORDER NO.1: Assistant City Engineer Ralph Pease submitted
and briefed a letter containing items necessitating change order, in the
amount of $21,621.70, and recommended said Change Order be approved.
Each item of the change order was explained by Mr. Pease, as well
as the problems involved on the project. It was noted that the extras on
the change order were due primarily to irrigation lines and the necessity of
relocating, lowering and reconstruction of said lines, including rock work
bedding.
It was determined by the City Council that adequate reasons for
the change order were reported, and on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded
by Councilman Schutte, Change Order No.1, Job No. 658, was approved in
accordance with the Assistant City EngineerVs recommendation. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-358: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-358 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE WITH REFERENCE TO THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION LIGHTING SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND EUCLID STREET.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-358 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-359: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-359 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
SHERWOOD COUNTY LIGHTING DISTRICT WITH REFERENCE TO THE PERFORMANCE OF
CERTAIN ACTS BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE MAINTENANCE OF SAID
DISTRICTvS LIGHTING SYSTEM.
6703
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P,M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, SChutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No, 63R-359 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-360: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-360 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES UPON AND ACROSS CERTAIN PROPERTY OF LOS ANGELES
& SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY AND ITS LESSEE, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT GRANTING SAID
EASEMENT. (Union Pacific Railroad Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-360 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-361 to 63R-372,
both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-36l: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Robert L. Wetzler, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO" 63R-362: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A
WATER LINEa (Bryan Industrial Properties, Inc., formerly known as Dream
Homes, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-363: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A WATER LINE.
(Dorothy G. Reuter)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-364: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A
WATER LINE. (M. H. Gifford, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-365: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A
WATER LINE. (Halecrest Development Corp.)
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-366: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(W. H. Jewett, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-367: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Randall Ray Bivens, et ux)
i~,.'"..""",~I.;;;"'"+"''''''''''''''''''h,"""",,,':,,"'H",..,,,~i_,,,,;.;,~,,,.~ '-''W
I I
6704
~
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7~ 1963~ 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-368: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(W. H. Jewett, et ux.)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-369: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Alban Holtz, et ux)
-
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-370: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Edward Mills, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-37l: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Le Grand D. Spencer, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-372: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Dorothea Pinkham, et al)
On roll call, the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-361 to 63R-372, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-373: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-373 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EMPLOYING DIEHL,
EVANS AND COMPANY TO AUDIT THE BOOKS, RECORDS, ETC. OF THE CITY; AND
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayer declared Resolution No. 63R-373 duly passed and adopted.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: Claims filed by Henry Wagner and Emma C. Wagner, and
Herman L. Lenz and Muriel Lenz, for damages purportedly resulting in February,
1963, from diversion of surface waters, were submitted.
Said claims were denied and referred to the City Attorney and City
Insurance Carrier, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Schutte, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to
cancel County taxes on the following property acquired by the City of
Anaheim for municipal purposes:
6705
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-2~0, formerly
assessed to Eugenio B. De La Cruz, et ux, deed recorded April 17, 1963
in Book 65119 Page 5, Official Records of Orange County, California.
MOTION CARRIED"
ANAHEIM CITIZENS CIVIL DEFENSE COMMITTEE - RESIGNATION: On the recommendations
of Mr. Paul L. Hayes, Civil Defense Coordinator, the resignation of Mr.
Richard C. Martin as Vice-Chairman of the Anaheim Citizens Civil Defense
Committee was accepted with regret, on motion by Councilman Schutte,
seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM CITIZENS CIVIL DEFENSE COMMITTEE - APPOINTMENT: In accordance with
recommendation of Civil Defense Coordinator, Paul L. Hayes, Mrs. Norma
Theil was appointed to fill the position of Vice-Chairman of the Anaheim
CItizens Civil Defense Committee, on motion by Councilman SChutte,
seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIEDQ
CORRESPONDENCE: ~le following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION
CARRIED:
a. Eileen Anne Druiff, regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 316.
Mrs. Druiff requested permission to address the Council, and
briefed the contents of her letter requesting that Resolution No. 62R-I091
granting Conditional Use Permit No. 316 be amended to be more restrictive,
and stated her reasons therefor.
Discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney, and
the City Clerk was requested to obtain the Conditional Use Permit No. 316
file, duplIcating pertinent papers for distribution to the City Council
prior to the May l4, 1963 meeting, to allow review of this matter, said
request to be further considered May 14, 1963.
b. Assemblyman Robert E. Badham - supporting Senate Bill 778.
c. Feather River Project Association - Bills introduced in the Legislature
affectIng watero
o. Controller of State of California Apportionments of Vehicle License
Fee Revenues for 1963-64 Fiscal Year.
e. Orange County MOSqUIto Abatement District - Minutes, April 19 meeting.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motIon. MO'fION CARRIED. (5:07 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the mepting to order, all members of the
Council being present.
FLAG SALUTE: The Mayor led the assembly In the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
PUBLIC HEARINGS_ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-69 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 367:
Submitted by Russell Moore, Owner; Builder Service Unlimited, Aaent,
requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, to permit the construction of a
two story planned unit multiple family residential development, and waiver
of one story height limitation, on property located at 727 South Beach
Boclevard (west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 1,290 feet north of
Ball Road.)
The CIty Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
695, Series 1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-69 be denied.
The Clty PlannIng Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
696, Series 1962-63, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 367.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the locatIon of subject property, and
noted the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized
the eVldence presented by the applicant at the City Planning Commission
hearing~ Mr. Kreidt advIsed that the Commission was of the opinion that
the plans presented did not constItute a planned residential development,
_.'.,,,-.....~""__...._..~~..._...,__-. ....., m",;'-'--".'4,*,'~:C:EC'-;;',,~- <
6706
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
and because of the size and shape of the property, the proposed living
environment the developer wished to establish would not be acceptable.
Plans and the file were reviewed and the Mayor asked if the
appllcant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Ed Cronan, Builders Service Unlimited, 11752 Garden Grove
Boulevard, Garden Grove, representing Coastal Gardens, Incorporated,
and Mr. Russell Moore~ President of Coastal Gardens, advised they realized
they have a problem parcel of property, and have been endeavoring to work
OJt a satisfactory plan with the Planning Staff; that the front portion of
thIS land has been indicated on the Master Plan for development in accordance
with the surrounding commercial-recreational area; that the applicant has
owned this property for several years, and one of the reasons he has not
developed accordingly is because economically, this would further add a
burden to the motel situation in this particular area. Further, to
subdivide this 145 foot wide by 620 foot deep lot would require a sixty
foot street dedication~ making the property impractical for single family
development.
Mr. Cronan was of the opinion that the area was not ready for
commercial development at the present time, and due to the economic
factors involved, the applicant did not desire to continue use of this large
parcel of property for one single family residence; therefore, he requested
that the Council consider the plan for development as submitted. He further
explained their proposed plans of development, and advised that they propose
forty-four units; however, subject property is capable of containing
seventy-two and one-half units.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-374: Plans and the file were reviewed and discussion held,
and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-374
for adoption, upholding the findings of the City Planning Commission, denying
ReclassificatIon No. 62-63-69.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED~ (62-63-69)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC I LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-374 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOG 63R-375: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-375 for
adoptIon.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NOG 367.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was dUly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-375 duly passed and adopted.
1.... t
6707
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler left the Council Table, 7:10 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-81: Submitted by United Savings and
Loan Association, Owners; Richard M. Guetzow, Agent, requesting change of
zone from R-A to R-3 to permit the development of a one and two-story
multiple family subdivision on property located at the northwest corner of
Santa Ana Canyon Road and Jefferson Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 698,
Series 1962-63, recommended approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. Recordation of a Final Tract Map of subject property.
2. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4,
and all R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Code requirements.
5. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west boundary of
subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property in
relatIon to the boundaries of the City of Orange and the County of Orange,
and in summarizing the evidence presented at the City Planning Commission
hearing, referred to the petitions of opposition filed containing approxi-
mately 115 signatures.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Council, along with
Tentative Map of Tract No. 4643, containing 63 proposed R-3 lots; and it
was noted that in November, 1961, Conditional Use Permit No. 144 was granted
for a mobile home park on subject property, which Conditional Use Permit
has now expired.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the CouncIl.
Mr. Richard M. Guetzow, 6972 Grasswood, Malibu, California, Acent
for the owner in fee, addressed the Council advising that subject property
IS under optIon to his company, Hawcal, Inc., and explained that it is
their intent to develop in accordance WIth the exhibits previously submitted
and on file with their application, which they tried to design in accordance
with the R-3 Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim; that the only two-story
buildings proposed are in the central portion of the property, being the
tier of lots numbers 22 to 40; that the remainder of the lots being lots I
to 219 inclUSIve, and lots 41 to 61, inclusive, are designed for single-
story, and are those faCIng Jefferson Street and those backing up to the
R-l tract.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Richard Hunsaker, President of S. V. Hunsaker & Sons, advised
that they are in oppos tlon to the proposed rezoning because of the character
of the entire residential area; that they are the developers of a single
family residentIal tract immed1ately to the West of subject property, and
there IS also another residentIal tract immediately adjacent to theirs, with
homes sell1ng in the $23,000. price class. He stated their objections were
based on the fact that they do not feel this is a proper location for
apartments, due to the gpneral single family characteristic of the area,
and also due to the difficulty in obtaining access to the area.
Mr. WIlliam Linsenbard, l640 Riverview Avenue, Orange, California,
spoke In oppositIon to subject applIcation, concurring with the statements
made by Mr. Hunsaker. He advised he represented most of the property owners
1n the area, both in the CIty of Orange and the County of Orange, and that
they are of the unanimous opinIon that the construction of multiple family
dwellings in the area would be deleterious to the environment in which they
lIve; that they moved into the area, bearing in mind the master plan
Indicated single-family development for the area. He stated they are opposed
to apartments of any kind, and in vieWIng the plans and the file, could find
6708
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
no guarantee as to the quality of the apartments or price range. He felt
to allow the apartments would add to the noise and traffic problem.
Mr. Linsenbard submitted a number of brochures, indicating the
high quality of homes in tracts immediately contiguous to the proposed
area; that their homes immediately to the West of subject property contained
1,250 square foot living area, and are priced from $19,000. upwards.
In answer to Mayor Coons' question, Mr. Linsenbard advised he
was not aware that a mobile home park had been approved for subject
property when he purchased his home.
Mr. SChroeder, owner of property in the single family tract
directly to the West of subject property, spoke in opposition, concurring
with the statements made by Mr. Hunsaker and Mr. Linsenbard. He further
stated he had not received a notice of this public hearing.
Mayor Coons explained to Mr. Schroeder and the audience that
the names of property owners are obtained from the last equalized assess-
ment rolls, and in viewing the files, Hunsaker & Sons, the tract subdivider,
did receive a written notice.
Mrs. William Linsenbard addressed the Council in opposition to
the proposed apartment development, advising that the majority of their
single family homes within a ten mile radius are at a price above $20,000.
She was of the opinion that subject property could be developed as single-
family residential in a profitable manner, and referred to the letter from
the City of Orange, sub~itted at the City Planning Commission hearing,
recommending approval of any R-3 Zoning.
Mr. Sach, resident in the tract adjacent to the West of subject
property, addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed apartments.
Mr. Bob Reese, developer of Urbana Terrace Homes, approximately
600 feet west of subject property, was of the opinion that the proposed
apartment development would be detrimental to their sales program, as their
tract contains homes in the price range of $21,000. to $25,000. He noted
that even though subject property is within the City Limits of Anaheim, the
school systems in this area all merge with the City of Orange School District.
The City Clerk read in full communication dated May 6, 1963, from
George Kovatch, City Planner and Secretary to the Planning Commission, City
of Orange, recommending to the Anaheim City Council that Revised Tentative
Map, Tract No. 4643, be disapproved.
In rebuttal, Mr. Guetzow advised that the zoning surrounding the
subject property is not completely R-l, as immediately to the southeast is a
subdivision of multiple family dwellings and light commercial, being directly
across the street from Lot 63 of their proposed Tract No. 4643. He stated
that their proposed development would not bring traffic through any of the
residential subdivisions that now exist, as the vehicles will have to travel
arterial streets for ingress and egress to said tract. He advised that
land and development costs are higher in this area than elsewhere in Southern
California, and was of the opinion that their proposed development would be
the best use for the land.
Mr. Stanley Ritter, 6505 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, asso-
ciated with the Agent, urged approval of subject application in accordance
with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. He further
explained their plans as to quality of construction and architecture, and
was of the opinion there was a need for a "high-type" rental development
in this area.
Mr. Costlow, residing immediately adjacent to the West of subject
property questioned if the property is rezoned, what provisions were made
as to a wall or alley between their homes and the apartment buildings.
I I
6709
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Mayor Coons advised Mr. Costlow that in accordance with the
Anaheim Municipal Code, a six foot masonry wall would separate the
R-3 from their single-family homes.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone had any new evidence to submit,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-376: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-376
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone, as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-81 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein and Coons.
Schutte.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-376 duly passed and adopted.
REVISED TENTATIVE MAP_ TRACT NO. 4643: Subdivider, Hawcal, Inc.; tracted
located at the northwest corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Jefferson
Street (Reclassification No. 62-63-81), and contains 63 proposed R-3 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 1, 1963,
recommended approval of said Revised Tentative Map, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. That there be provisions of an adequate drainage plan, by filling the
northerly end of the tract to discharge into the river at its present
flowline, pumping to the riveris present flowline, discharging into the
City of Orange or any other method which is to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
3. That the developer shall participate in the cost of the Santa Ana River
levee protection in proportion to the area benefited by said levee,
based upon the area of benefit and contract prices for said levee pro-
tection, subject to review by the City Engineer and the tract engineer,
and approval thereof by the Director of Public Works.
4. Provision of corner cut-offs on the alleys which shall be made in
accordance with and the approval of the City Engineer.
5. Full improvements to be installed on Batavia Street, with the City to do
the center twenty-four (24) feet of paving.
6. Dedication of access rights to Jefferson and Batavia Streets, except at
street and alley openings.
7. Kodiak Street shall be a sixty-four (64) foot right-af-way.
8. Full dedication of Batavia and Jefferson Strepts shall be provided
within the property ownership, with full improvement of Jefferson Street
south of the northerly line of Batavia Street, with the City to do the
center twenty-four (24) feet within the City Limits.
9. Subject to the reclassification of subject property from the R-A, Resi-
dential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential,
Zone, as approved and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-81.
It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that Revised Tentative Map, Tract No. 4643, be approved, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
'~~"",~,.,-,~"~~-",,"~_~~,",,io#' ... I
6710
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler returned to the Council Table, 7:50 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-85 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 384:
Submitted by Melvin F. Bentjen and Arthur E. Bentjen, Owners; LeRoy Rose,
Agent, requesting change of zone from R-O to R-3 to permit the construction
of a two-story planned multiple family development with carports and waiver
of height limitations and parking requirements, on property located on the
north side of Westmont Drive, approximately 360 feet east of Loara Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 684,
Series 1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-85 be denied. The
City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 685, Series 1962-63,
denied Conditional Use Permit No. 384.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence
submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing, resulting in their finding
that the proposed development is incompatible to the low density residential
adjacent to subject property. He noted the petition of opposition filed,
containing about 152 signatures.
The Mayor asked if the applicants or their agent were present.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney, advised that he has only recently been
contacted by the applicants as their representative, and did not appear on
their behalf before the City Planning Commission hearing. Mr. Knisely advised
that the applicants are also the owners of the large acreage immediately to
the East of subject property, and requested that the Council grant a con-
tinuance of this matter to allow for further study with the City staff and the
adjacent property owners to the end that a precise plan of development would
be submitted for the entire combined acreage (twenty-two acres) which includes
all the remaining vacant land in this area. He felt it is obvious that por-
tions of subject property are in the R-O area; however, there is also land
adjacent to the school where perhaps a very desirable lesser use could be
developed. He advised that he was aware only the five acre parcel was
before the Council for consideration at this time, and that an additional
application would have to be filed if a proper plan for development were
prepared for the entire acreage.
CouncIl.
The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the
Dr. Bouchelle, 1416 Birchmont Drive, in the Westmont Estates
area, addressed the Council in opposition. He stated that this is a resi-
dential area of $40,000. to $50,000. homes, and could see no reason for any
further continuance, because any plan of development containing multiple
family homes would be detrimental to the Westmont Estates and the Dwyer Drive
area; that they have appeared in opposition to mUltiple-family and commercial
developments in this area for the past four years, and would continue to
oppose like developments.
Mr. Stan Whieldon, developer of the Westmont Estates, briefed the
history of their initial R-O development of large lots and custom homes; that
prior to development, the City advised that they would protest the area on
the West to Euclid Street, on the North to North Street, and on the East to
West Street, in accordance with tract restrictions, and with a minimum
requirement of 9,000 square foot lots. He was of the opinion to allow apart-
ments of any kind across the street from Westmont Estates would be very
unjust to the existing R-O homes in the area.
Mr. Vernon Rolo, 1452 Westmont Drive, directly across from the
property in question, addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed
apartment development, with carports, and less than minimum parking require-
ments. He advised that since the construction of the Latter Day Saints
Church and School, parking in the area is very limited, and therefore
requested that parking requirements not be waived for any type of development
on the subject property.
-~".~"~"Fk,1iiti',~"'~,",-,~_"" ,,'--_~-li
67ll
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was moved by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that public hearings
on subject application be continued to May 28, 1963 for submission of
precise plan of development for the entire acreage, as requested by Mr.
Knisely.
Further discussion was held by the Council, and the applicant
was advised that if subject applications are continued for consideration of
an over-all development plan, at that time said applications would be
referred back to the City Planning Commission for report and recommendations,
thereby necessitating additional appearances before the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
Mr. Knisely stated that under the circumstances the applicants
have requested withdrawal of application No. 62-63-85 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 384; that they will work with the Planning Staff and the residents
in the area in question in an effort to resolve this matter, and will then
file a new application.
Councilman Dutton and Councilman Chandler withdrew their previous
motion to grant continuance.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that the verbal request of the applicants for withdrawal of Reclassification
No. 62-63-85 and Conditional Use Permit No. 384 be granted. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-87: Submitted by Antonio Vesce,
Owner; Richard L. Pierce, Agent, requesting change of zone from C-2 to R-3,
to permit the construction of a 14-unit apartment building on property
located at the southeast corner of Center Street and Cherry Street, and
further described as 1224 West Center Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 704,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Installation of sidewalks on Cherry Street in accordance with the
adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
2. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to
be collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Center
and Cherry Streets.
5. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1 and 4.
6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence
submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing, advising that no one
appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Plans and the file were reviewed, and the Mayor asked if the
applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Richard Pierce, 1824 East Nineteenth Street, Santa Ana,
California, Agent for the applicant, advised that their plans are to
demolish and remove existing Mexican restaurant on the corner, and develop
a regency classic design two-story, twelve unit apartment house_
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-377: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-377
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
II
6712
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-87 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-377 duly passed and adopted.
Mr. Pierce questioned the street lighting charge on Cherry Street,
and was advised that said condition applied to frontage on both Center Street
and Cherry Street; that if upon investigation records indicate previous pay-
ment of said street lighting charges, adjustment will be made accordingly.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-92: Submitted by Edith W. Gilmore,
Owner; Art Pilant, Agent, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 to permit
the development of a multiple family subdivision (Tentative Tract No. 5063);
property located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, approximately
631 feet east of Jefferson Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
705, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
2. Recordation of a Final Tract Map of subject property.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Development plans for subject property shall be subject to City Council
approval, prior to issuance of a building permit, in no case shall more
than eighteen (18) dwelling units per net residential acre be established
on subject property.
5. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north and east
property lines of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
the existing uses and zoning in the area, and summarized the evidence sub-
mitted at the City Planning Commission hearing. He noted that subject
property is immediately adjacent to a frontage road, which in turn, is
adjacent to the Riverside and Newport Freeways.
Tentative Map of Tract No. 5063, containing ten proposed R-3 lots,
together with application file, was reviewed and discussion was held by the
City Council regarding the restriction in the City Planning Commission reso-
lution limiting the proposed development to eighteen dwelling units per net
residential acre; and Mr. Kreidt advised that it was the intent of the
CommIssion to require subject development to be compatible as far as
density to the development proposed in this immediate area under Reclassifi-
cation No. 62-63-81.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. Ted Fish, 1234 East Lincoln Avenue, representing the applicant,
requested approval of said R-3 Zoning, as recommended by the City Planning
Commission, with the elimination of Condition 4 thereof, and questioned the
correlation between their four acre parcel and the approximately twenty
acre parcel on the west side of Jefferson Street (Reclassification No.
62-63-81 - R-3). He was of the opinion that the basic R-3 Zoning Code
should apply, and to limit their 12,000 square foot lots to four units each,
was far too restrictive. Mr. Fish advised that they have no plans to
present, as they are proposing a "lot sales" subdivision; however, with the
price of the land and the cost of development, he assured the Council the
~"";'~~"."'""^"''''-~''''''''<''''''''_'_':''~"''4''''~'!_:',.'"''-__'_._._:.,",,~~;.~
6713
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
apartments constructed would be of very high quality and large sizes. He
stated that if the rezoning was granted with the restrictions, it would
be, in effect, a disapproval, because they could not develop subject
property with the construction limitation per net residential acre, as
recommended by the City Planning Commission. He advised they have no
objection to the condition requiring the presentation of development plans
on each lot to be submitted to the Development Review Committee for
approval.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-378: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-378
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
with the exception that Condition No.4 thereof be amended to read as
follows:
4. The filing of deed restrictions requIrIng the submission of plans for
development to the City of Anaheim Development Review Committee for
approval, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-92 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-378 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP_ TRACT NO. 5063: Developer, Ted Fish; tract located on the
north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, approximately 631 feet east of the
centerline of Jefferson Street, and contains ten proposed R-3 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 1, 1963,
approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions:
l. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential Zone, as approved and completed under Reclassifica-
tion No. 62-63-92.
2. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac at the terminus of Merrimac Drive,
subject to the approval of the County Road Department and the City
Engineer. Engineering to be by the City of Anaheim and construction
by the developer.
3. Provision of a dedicated 6~-foot street for Merrimac Drive, in accordance
with standard R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone requirements.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
Tentative Map of Tract No. 5063 was approved, subject to the recommenda-
tions of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS_RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-93 AND VARIANCE NO. 1558: Submitted
by Ivan J. and Iva L. Scott, Owners; Tom B. Lewis or Morri Bitker, Agents,
requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 and waiver of one story height
limitation and allow construction of carports in conjunction with an 18-
unit apartment building, on property located on the north side of Ball Road
approximately 135 feet east of Dale Street.
6714
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 706,
Series 1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-93 be denied. The
City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 707, Series
1962-63, denied Variance No. 1558.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, noting that subject property
is a long, narrow parcel having an eighty foot frontage on Ball Road and
extending northerly approximately 300 feet after dedication. Mr. Kreidt
briefed the evidence submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing.
--,
Plans and the files were reviewed by the Council, and the Mayor
asked if the applicant or his agent were present and wished to address the
Council. There was no response.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Clifford Vogel, 2761 West Ball Road, addressed the Council in
opposition to the proposed R-3 development. He advised that the two-story
apartments would remove the privacy enjoyed by the adjacent residents, that
the properties in this immediate area are one acre or more parcels, fronting
on the heavily traveled Ball Road. He stated that he was speaking for the
owners of said R-A parcels, and advised that they all favor future commercial
development for their land.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No.
62-63-93 and Variance No. 1558.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-379: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-379,
sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission and denying
Reclassification No. 62-63-93.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-93)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC I LM EN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-379 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-380: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-380 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO.
1558.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-380 duly passed and adopted.
~,..,....~:';';U;;:;;;'""<;''''''''~'",,,~,,,,,,~,,,,,''---_'T
6715
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-95 AND VARIANCE NO. 1561: Sub-
mitted by Robert R. and Noxie L. Stearns, Edna C. Mackay, Michael J.
and Frieda D. Roll, Owners; M. L. McGaughy, Agent, requesting change of zone
from R-A and C-l, to: Parcel "A", C-l, and Parcel "B", R-3, to permit the
establishment of a two story multiple family subdivision; further requesting
waiver of block wall requirement along the eastern boundary; waive one story
height limitation to permit two story planned multiple development. Property
located at 2936 and 2950 West Lincoln Avenue (south side of Lincoln Avenue,
approximately 671 feet east of Beach Boulevard.)
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 708,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Recordation of a Final Tract Map of sUbject property.
2. PaYment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
4. Subject to the approval of Variance No. 1561.
5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3,
as amended herein.
6. Development of the commercial and residential portions of subject
property shall be subject to Development Review approval, prior to
Final Building Inspection.
7. Installation of a six (6) foot strip of landscaping abutting the planned
highway right-of-way line of Lincoln Avenue and the abutting street to
the West, and installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals
in the parkway portion of Lincoln Avenue, plans for said landscaping
to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance, plans for said tree wells shall be subject to the
approval of the State Highway Department, and said landscaping and tree
wells to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
8. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the southerly boundary
of Lot No.1, prior to Final Building Inspection.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 709,
Series 1962-63, granted Variance No. 1561, subject to the reclassification
of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone, as
approved and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-95.
Mr. Martin Kreidt reviewed the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence
presented at the City Planning Commission hearing. He advised that the
basic concern of the Commission in considering Tentative Tract No. 5090 was
provision for the stubbing of a street to the East to insure development of
the abutting property.
Plans and the files and Tentative Map of Tract No. 5090 were
reviewed by the Council, and the Mayor asked if the applicant or Mr. McGaughy,
the developer, was present.
Mr. Michael Roll, one of the owners of the property under considera-
tion, advised that they are willing to cooperate with the owners of the
property immediately to the East with reference to the street layout in
Tentative Tract No. 5090; that the proposed low density development for
subject property is a continuance of the fine R-3 apartments immediately
adjacent to the West.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification
No. 62-63-95 and Variance No. 1561.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-38l: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-38l
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone, as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
6716
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-95 - C-l and R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
--,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-381 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-382: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-382
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1561, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1561.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-382 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5090: Owners, Michael J. Roll, Fred T. Mackay and
Robert Stearns; subdivider, Mel McGaughy, tract located on the south side of
Lincoln Avenue approximately 1,678.90 feet west of Dale Street, and contains
18, R-3 residential lots and 1, C-l Neighborhood Commercial lot.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 1, 1963
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
l. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential, and C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zones as approved
and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-95.
3. A predetermined price for Lot 6 shall be calculated and an agreement
for dedication entered into between the developer and the City of
Anaheim prior to approval of the final map. The cost of Lot A shall
include land and a proportionate share of the underground utilities
and street improvements.
4. Acquire Lots A, C, and E of Tract No. 426l to provide access to the
existing streets and alleys.
5. Ridgeway Street shall be abandoned prior to the recordation of the tract
map.
6. Lot "B" shall be indicated in the Final Tract Map, shall be located
between Lot Nos. 2 through 9, shall be 64 feet in width and 131t feet in
depth, and shall be offered for sale to the abutting property owner to
the east at a price reflecting the cost of land and improvements. If,
within 60 days of City Council approval of subject Tentative Tract Map,
the abutting property owner to the east does not acquire said Lot "B",
it shall become a portion of the Ibuildable tract area, and no stub
street shall be provided to the east. If it is acquired, it shall be
fully improved to provide a stub street to the east and shall be so
indicated on" the Final Tract Map.
~'!O-~_~'~''=>--.-.'i#_;ii;;;._''':';_';;;;;;'''-;~'':'''~''''_,,^,,";,_,,-- T
6717
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Chandler, that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5090, be approved by the City
Council, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-96 AND VARIANCE NO. 1562: Submitted
by Arno H. Stovall, Owner; Russell Jay and or Mel McGaughy, Agents, request-
ing change of zone from R-A to R-3 to permit the establishment of a two-
story multiple family subdivision on property located on the west side of
Western Avenue, approximately 330 feet south of Lincoln Avenue, (Tentative
Tract No. 5102); and further requesting waiver of block wall and one story
height limitation.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 710,
Series 1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-96 for approval,
subject to the following conditions:
l. Recordation of a Final Tract Map of subject property.
2. Subject to the approval of Petition for Variance No. 1562.
3. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and
5, as amended herein.
6. Development of subject property in accordance with all R-3 Code
requirements including nine (9) foot wide garage door openings.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 711,
Series 1962-63, granted Variance No. 1562, subject to the reclassification
of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone, as
approved and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-96.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted thp location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence
submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing.
Plans and the files, together with Tentative Map of Tract No. 5102
containing 17 proposed R-3 lots, were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent were present. There
was no response.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mrs. June Lenc, 3312 West Glen Holly, addressed the Council in
opposition, advising that she did not live immediately adjacent to subject
property; however she would be sharing the park and schools with subject
area; that the proposed development is immediately adjacent to two-story
apartments constructed under the minimum Code standards, and the people in
the area are afraid that subject two-story development will continue in
the same manner with the density that presently exists.
Mr. Fredrick C. Howard, 145 South Western Avenue, Owner of property
immediately south of the property under consideration, addressed the Council
in opposition, being of the opinion that the proposed two-story apartments
will look directly into the patios of the tenants that will be occupying his
Single-story apartment development, as welt as his own home. He advised that
his property has been zoned R-3, restricted to single story, and he has
reduced his development from the original 24 units to 22 units, to further
comply with the Building Code requirements, and provide more green area
between their apartments; that to saturate the property to the North with
two-story enables the developer to obtain a more attractive loan, which in
turn permits Cheaper rentals, because of low loan payments, etc.; therefore,
the adjacent two-story would definitely create a financial hardship on his
proposed development, because of the single-story restriction.
",~,:,-,.,'.'~~-i~'"""",,,,,,.-..,,~__.,..~","""",,,,,","'^,," .' T
6718
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Howard stated that before he presented his application to
the City, he was advisQd by the Building Department that no additional
two-story dwellings would be tolerated in this area, and therefore, he
submitted a twenty-four unit single-story development plan on the rear
approximate two acres of his property; that he had originally planned
two-story development at the rear, or on the alley adjacent to Lincoln
Arms, but his plans were revised to conform to single-story. He advised
he was not disappointed with his single-story R-3, as he has plans for
a nice garden apartment type dQvelopment.
-~
Mr. Howard further objected to the proposed street separating
the two sets of apartments. He stated that if the proposed two-story
development is approved, he would have to withdraw any further building
on his property, as he did not feel he could meet the competition. He
advised that hQ was not opposed to R-3 Zoning, but requested it be limited
to one-story construction.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mrs. Harold Forsyth, 3138 West Del Monte Drive, addressed the
Council in opposition, and submitted petitions containing approximately
147 signatures protesting said two-story apartments. She advised that the
schools in the area are already so over-crowded, that there has been
consIderation given to beginning one-half day sessions.
Mrs. Donald Davis, 3167 Del Monte Drive, spoke in opposition,
also referring to the additional burden the proposed development would
place on the schools in the area. She requested that if said apartments
were approved, they be limited to single-story.
Mrs. Estelle Thompson, 3142 West Vallejo Drive, Anaheim, stated
she objected to these proposed units because she felt the vacancy factor
In Anaheim, being as much as 20 to 25 per cent, is entirely too great to
justify more units in this area. She was of the opinion that the return
of apartment investments was not suffIcient for the amount of units that
are being built, and because of the large vacancy factor, the apartments
become cheaper and tend to invite undesirable living environment.
The Mayor asked if anyone had any new evidence to present.
Mr. Murdoch, for clarification concerning the statements made
by Mr. Howard, attributed to the Building Department, asked if perhaps the
statements could have been from the Planning Staff.
office.
Mr. Howard replied that the statements were made in Mr. Krieger's
As Mr. Krieger is a member of the Planning Staff, it was determined
that the department was Planning Department, and not the Building Department.
During the submission of evidence by the opposition, Mr. McGaughy,
Agent for the applicant, entered the meeting, and Mayor Coons asked if he
wished to address the Council.
Mr. M. L. McGaughy, 910 South Western Avenue, builder and developer
of subject property for the owner, Mr. Stovall, advised that he has built
twenty-two buildings in the immediate area, and the fact that all of these
are now sold proves to him that the proposed deluxe development now planned
will be an asset to this area.
Mr. Howard further advised that although he was a smaller developer
than Mr. McGaughy, he paid much more for his land and still felt willing and
capable to build single-story structures.
Mr. McGaughy further explained his plans of development, and was
of the opinIon that the arrangement of the buildings would eliminate any
large visual area to over-look the adjacent property.
6719
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mayor Coons felt that a general feeling of the area had been
expressed, and thereupon declared the hearing closed on Reclassification
No. 62-63-96 and Variance No. 1562.
Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at the
conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Council-
man Schutte, that action on Reclassification No. 62-63-96 and Variance No.
1562 be deferred for one week, May 14, 1963, 3:00 P.M., to resolve the
difference as to what advice was given to Mr. Howard, the applicant south
of subject property. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5102: Developer, Mel-Mack; tract located on the
west side of Western Avenue, approximately 330 feet south of Lincoln Avenue,
containing 17 proposed R-3 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 1, 1963,
approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
2. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential, Zone as approved and completed under Reclassification
No. 62-63-96.
3. Provision of an alley cut-off on the southwesterly corner of Lot No.9.
Mr. McGaughy, developer, verbally requested that action on Tenta-
tive Tract No. 5102 also be deferred to be considered in conjunction with
Reclassification No. 62-63-96, and Variance No. 1562.
It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
that the verbal request to continue action on Tentative Tract No. 5102 to
May 14, 1963, 3:00 P.M. be granted. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:30 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-97: Submitted by Free Methodist
Church of Anaheim, Owner, requesting change of zone from P-l to C-2, to
permit the establishment of a real estate office on property located at
215 West Broadway (north side of Broadway, between Clementine Street and
Lemon Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 712,
Series 1962-63, recommended approval of C-l Zoning, subject to the limitation
of all signs to one sign, with a maximum area of eight square feet, and the
prohibitation of all signs, banners, flags and lights.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
existing zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence presented
at the City Planning Commission hearing, advising that the use that was
intended for subject property was C-l, therefore the City Planning Commission
recommended approval of C-I Zoning instead of C-2, as requested by the
applicant; that concern was expressed that certain C-2 operations, such as
alcoholic beverage sales, could be undesirable in the area.
Plans and the file were reviewed, and the Mayor asked if the
applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Stanley Herber, 1171 North West Street, Pastor of the Free
Methodist Church of Anaheim, advised that they had the property for sale
with the understanding that the entire area was zoned C-2, and it wasn't
until negotiations were almost completed that it was discovered that the
Zone was P-I; that the proposed use for subject property is for the opera-
tion of a real estate office; however, when they discovered their zoning
was P-l, they applied for the zoning which they thought they held, and in
conformance with their negotiations of sale.
0A,...illiak,c'_-'.~e~'-fv,c;'_;';'_:,.""-""_",;"""",,,,,,,,,,,,~,=~_,=~
t. ...Ii"'.............
6720
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mrs. Vivian Engelbrecht, 218 West Florette, advised that she
purchased the property thinking it was C-2, with the intention of using
it as her real estate office; that she realized C-l zoning was the only
zoning needed for said office; however, stated she preferred the C-2, as
this was the zone both parties thought existed on the property. She
advised that the intended use could be professional, rather than commer-
cial, and displayed a rendering of the type of professional sign which
she proposed to erect.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City
Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
~
Discussion was held, and the surrounding C-2 properties noted;
regarding the possibility of liquor sales in this area, it was felt the
establishment thereof was very unlikely because of the close proximity of
the three churches within the one-block area.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-383: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-383,
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone
to C-2 on subject property, as requested (no conditions of zoning imposed).
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-97 - C-2)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-383 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. l844: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1844 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordina~ce Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION
14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (Lemon Street,
west side, from Los Angeles Street to La Palma Avenue)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1844 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the read-
ing in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte9 Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1844 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. l845: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1845 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-48 - R-3)
6721
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1845 and
having knowledge of the contents thprein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1845 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. l846: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1846 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-52 - C-2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1846 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1846 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1847: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1847 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION
14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking
at any Time - Los Angeles St., east side, from approximately 130 feet
south of the Santa Ana Freeway southbound on-ramp to approximately 430 feet
south thereof.)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1847 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1847 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. l850: Mr. Murdoch read in full report from the Traffic Engineer.
Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1850 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING PARAGRAPH 3
THEREOF, BY ADDING THERETO PARAGRAPH 23, AND BY DELETING THEREFROM
PARAGRAPH 4. (No Parking, portions of Loara Street and Crescent Avenue)
~*...._~~",-.~..".,a~.w.'~_i;'!L"l'~
"P"T- - f I
6722
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1850 and
having knowledge of th~ contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandl~r seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1851: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1851 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-76 - R-3)
---.
I
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1851 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
JOB NO. 722 - LA PALMA PARK RECREATION BUILDING: On report and recommendations
of the City Engineer and City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that the
Finance Director be authorized to draw a check in the amount of $20,497.82,
in payment of Progress Payment No.4, to allow the contractor, Clifford
Fesler Construction Company, for La Palma Park Recreation Building, Job No.
722, to receive tenth of the month discounts. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-384: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman
Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-384 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT ALL
PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY SHOULD BE EXEMPT FROM COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE PRO-
TECTION TAX.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-384 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-385: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-385 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH THE
ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TO JOINTLY ORGANIZE, PROMOTE AND CONDUCT
A PROGRAM OF COMMUNITY RECREATIONo
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-385 duly passed and adopted.
WEST COAST TRADE SCHOOLS .- INTERIM BUSINESS LICENSE: The Ci ty Manager reported
that West Coast Trade Schools, at 121 North Lemon Street, were granted an
Interim Business License on November 21, 1961, on condition that a proper
zoning application be filed within one week, to which an additional week
extension was granted November 28, 1961, to allow receipt of authorization
from the property owners; time limit of said Interim Business License to run
until action on said application was taken by the City Council.
'I
6723
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Murdoch advised that the people of West Coast Trade Schools
have been contacted on numerous occasions, the latest time being May 1,
1963, and as of this date, no application has been filed with the City
Planning Department. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council
terminate the proceedings on this license.
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler
moved that all proceedings with reference to the Interim Business License
granted West Coast Trade Schools, 121 North Lemon Street, be terminated,
and that the appropriate department be instructed to revoke said business
license. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-386: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman
Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-386 for adoption. (Said resolution
read in full by the City Manager)
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SETTING IN ABEYANCE
THE EFFECTIVE DATES OF THE PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTIONS NOS. 63R-266, 63R-267
AND 63R-306.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-386 duly passed and adopted.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following
Alcoholic Beverage License applications:
a. Person-to-Person Transfer, On-Sale Beer and Wine, Frankie9s Kitchen,
1219 South Brookhurst. No action was taken by the City Council.
b. Person-to-Person and Premises-to-Premises Transfer, On-Sale General
License - Kramer's Hofbrau, l160 North Dowling, Anaheim, California.
Discussion was held by the Council as to whether only the
Hofbrau activity was allowable under Conditional Use Permit No. 188.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the City Attorney's office was requested to further investigate, and if
it is determined this is not an allowable use under Conditional Use Permit
No. 188, that the Attorney be authorized to file a protest with the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. MOTION CARRIED.
LEGISLATION - ASSEMBLY BILLS 2353 AND 2409: Mr. Murdoch presented a detailed
report as to Assembly Bills 2353 and 2409, pertaining to the merging of
County Water Districts with Cities.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that our legislators be notified by writing, that the City of Anaheim
opposes said Assembly Bills. MOTION CARRIED.
OBSERVANCE. INDEPENDENCE DAY_ JULY 4: Mayor Coons reported on communications
recpived by him with reference to the observance of July 4th, with the
ringing of bells simultaneously across the nation, and requested an
expression from the Council members as to participation by the City.
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that the City of Anaheim participate in the program of "Make Freedom
Really Ring", and authorized the Mayor to issue a Proclamation to encourage
the ringing of bells and the flying of the American Flag on Independence
Day, July 4th. MOTION CARRIEDo
~,"~~.--_.,,.,,.~....._+,,+--,,,~,,,,,,,~,,,., ...
6724
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 10:35 P.M.
SIGNED: ~ /Jr. ~
Ci ty Clerk
-
I
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14.1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER~ James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Min~tes of the regular meeting held April 30, 1963, were approved,
on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED~ (Councilman Dutton abstained from voting.)
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-387: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-387 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MAY 14, 1963Q
(Warrants Nos. 24516 to 24893, both inclusive, totaling $1,259,159.75.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-387 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE TRACT NOQ 5113: Action on Tentative Tract No. 5113 was deferred from
the last meeting at the telephone request of the Engineers, Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, to further cons:der the length of the cul-de-sac street and drainage.
Mr. James Maddox reported that according to verbal information
received~ the developer has lost his optlon on the property, and wishes to
go no further with the tract.
As result of said information, on motion by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Dutton, Tentative Map, Tract No. 5113 was denied
without prejudice to re-'submit, with drainage and circulation conforming to
City requirements. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO., 316: Request of Mrs. Druiff to make certain additional
conditions a requirement of Conditional Use Permit No. 316, was deferred
from the last meeting to allow personal inspection by the City Council of the
property and the project.
~c-';:;;'~~"'."_lllf~ i~--_!IiI----.....2ii.