1963/05/14
6724
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 7. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
th~ motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 10:35 P.M.
SIGNED: ~ /n. ~
City Clerk
-
I
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14.1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meeting held April 30, 1963, were approved,
on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED~ (Councilman Dutton abstained from voting.)
RESOLUTION NOo 63R-387: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-387 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MAY 14, 1963Q
(Warrants Nos. 24516 to 24893, both inclusive, totaling $1,259,159.75.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followIng vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R~387 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO" 5113: Action on Tentative Tract No. 5113 was deferred from
the last meeting at the telephone request of the Engineers, Voorheis-Trindle-
Nelson, to further cons:der the length of the cul-de-sac street and drainage.
Mr. James Maddox reported that according to verbal information
received, the developer has lost his opt:on on the property, and wishes to
go no further with the tract.
As result of said information, on motion by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Dutton, Tentative Map, Tract No. 5113 was denied
without prejudice to re-submit, with drainage and circulation conforming to
City requirements. MOTION CARRIED~
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 316: Request of Mrs. Druiff to make certain additional
conditions a requirement of Conditional Use Permit No. 316, was deferred
from the last meeting to allow personal inspection by the City Council of the
property and the project.
~~~.:.:--~~~.ic,,^,..,_.:,..:,.,:;=~,,~._,..__.,;,*,E",.~^__:<t-">:~
f""~.
,~,.".~c";',..",=."..o;.",,,,;...,..,..,::;;:,i:,,~,...=.~..;;
6725
City Hall_ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14~ 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mayor Coons advised that three of the conditions referred to and
requested by Mrs. Druiff were conditions originally recommended by the City
Planning Commission and eliminated at the City Council hearing. Further,
that if ther0 is to be a change in the conditions, this matter would
require a re-hearing before the City Council.
The City Attorney reported that the Council had both the power
to revoke or modify said conditional use p~rmit for good cause.
Discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, it was mov0d
by COGncilman Schutte~ seconded by Councilman Krein, that public hearing
be scheduled June 11, 1963, 7~OO O~Clock PgM., and an order be issued to
show cause why said Conditional Use Permit No. 316 should not be revoked or
modified. To this motion, Councilman Chandler voted glNo." MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 62-63~96 ,- VARIANCE NO. 1562_ AND TENTATIVE MAP ~ TRACT 5102:
Public hearing was held May 7, 1963, at which time said hearing was closed,
and action of the City Council deferred to this date to further investigate
advice reportedly given by City employee to Mr. Howard, owner of the
adjacent property to the South.
Mr. Murdoch reported on investigation made in an effort to
determine exactly what happened prior to the time of the application. He
advised it was difficult to say exactly what the words were. First, at
the meeting last week, Mr. Howard indicated that the Building Department
had stated that the limitation would be one-story. ActuallY3 it was
determined that this was the Planning Department; further, it was indicated
that it was Mr. Krieger's particular responsibility. In the sequence of
events, Mr. Krieger was not in the Planning Department at that time, nor
did he have this responsibility. In checking with Mr. Howard 9 he described
the person he thought he had talked to prior to the filing of his applica-
tion, and it was felt this probably fit the description of Mr. Bob Mikelson.
Since there was no record of the discussion9 nor does Mr. Mikelson recall
any such discussion with Mr. Howard, and in order to try to determin0 what
likely happened, a further check was made.
It was found that the tract immediately to the West of the
Howard parcel, and immediately to the West of the McGaughy parcel, was
developed in two-story, and considerable dissatisfaction was expressed by
the Planning Commission in their tour of the area, after the buildings
were constructed. If there was any indication to Mr. Howard or anyone else
in the area of the limitation on the multiple family structures, as nearly
as we can determine, it would have been as result of the expression of the
Planning Commission; that this was not the type of development that would
be approved by the Planning Commission in subsequent action. This broad
statement did not necessarily limit the type of development to single-story,
but merely the type of the two-story developed.
The Howard parcel at the time of application was next to a multiple
parcel on the South, and to an R-A parcel on the North. In addition, the
R-3 parcel on the South of the Howard property is a rather narrow parcel,
and south of that is zoned R-A. As result, the one hundred and fifty foot
limitation to single-story, pursuant to the Code, would limit the development
of the Howard parcel for R~3 purposes to single-story.
It was Mr. Murdochqs impression that the statement could have
very likely been made that the R-3 structures on the Howard property would
be limited to single-story. The development to the West may have been
referred to, and some confusion may have resulted as to the reasons for the
single-story limitations.
Mayor Coons advised that at the last meeting of the City Council,
one of the Planning Commissioners was present, and indicated to him after
the Council meetin99 that when the Planning Commission was on their tour,
Mrs. Howard indicated to them that they did not want two-story structures,
because they were going to live on the property themselves.
6726
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-388: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-388
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the
zone as requested9 sUbject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission, eliminating therefrom Condition No.6.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAH,EIM MUNICIP AL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED, AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (62-63-96 ~ R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor d~clared R~solution No. 63R-388 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-389: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-389
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1562, sUbject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1562.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-389 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NOo 5102: Councilman Dutton moved Tentative Map, Tract
No. 5102, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commissiono Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
APPOINTMENTS: Mayor Coons made the following appointments:
Mr. Dan Rowland to the Anaheim City Planning Commission.
Mr. William Fricker, Member of the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Mr. Calvin Pebley, Planning Commission Representative of the Parks
and Recreation Commission.
Mr. Ray Link, Member of the Citizens Charter Committee.
Mayor Coons called attention to the fact that Mr. Dan Rowland is
an Architect in the City, and a~ times performs architectural services for
the City on a contract basis; Mr. Ray Link is in the insurance business, and
at times handles insurance items for the City; that these occupations were
considered prior to appointment, and it is the opinion of the City Attorney
that appointments to these bodies would not be a conflict of interest because
they are appointiv~ and take no official action in any case. Further, they
are not elected nor salaried; that their services are strictly in the nature
of civic interest.
The above appointments were ratified by the City Council on motion
by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT~ Pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-313, duly published
in the Anaheim Bulletin May 2, 1963, and notices posted in accordance with
law, public hearing was scheduled to consider the vacation and abandonment ill
a portion of Winston Road, and an easement for road and public utility
purposes upon, over, across and along certain property described.
~.k;'''~~_,*,.:,Ii..',..;;."".:",H.';''''.'_"":.o;;.;.~,,"_",' ....-,..-
'4_",.~,.,-_._..,"_~.,.,__"".,~,
6727
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P~Ma
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in
opposition to said abandonment, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed.
Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, r~comm~nd~d said abandonm~nt, with
the following requirements;
1. Reservation of a fifteen foot easement because of existing
water and gas lines.
2. Preparation of improvement plans and installation of modified
cul-de~sac at the west end of the requested abandonment,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
3. Granting to the City of Anaheim an Easement Deed for the
cul-de-sac, as approved by the City Engineer.
40 Reservation of an easement for Edison Company facility, with
rights of ingress and egress provided.
RESOLUTION NOa 63R-390~ Councilman Schutt~ offered Resolution No. 63R-390
for adoption, authorizing said abandonment, subject to the recommendations of
the City Engine~r.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF WINSTON ROAD AND AN EASEMENT FOR
ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH
THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS PORTIONS OF SAID PROPERTY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN ~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Noneu
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-390 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARINGQ HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Mit-Mor Develop-
ment Corporation, requesting permission to move a dwelling (house and
garage) from 2321 Wagner Road, Anaheim, to 1124 Rosemont Avenue (correct
address 1128 Rosemont Avenue) was presented.
The City Clerk reported that a petition of protest, together with
pictures of residences in the immediate area, was filed this afternoon;
however too late to check and determine what percentage of the area was in
opposition to said house moving permit.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council concerning
this matter.
Mr. Mark, 1124 Rosemont Avenue, owner of property adjacent to
subJect property? addressed the Council advising that he and Mr. Johnson
were the circulators of the petition of protest, and not knowing what
percentage of names was required to keep this issue, was certain that both
he and Mr. Johnson could obtain additional signatures, as many others in
the area have expressed their interest and desire to sign the petition.
Mr. Mark further advised that he has seen the dwelling that is
requested to be relocated.
Mr. Dale Walker, 1118 West Rosemont Avenue, asked the City
Attorney if the protest is to be by the majority of the people within the
300 foot limitation.
The City Attorney read from the Anaheim Municipal Code, and
interpreted that the Code provides that notification be sent to owners of
property within 300 feet. Concerning the fifty per cent objection factor,
Mr. Geisler advised that it is the Council's discretion to determine the
.z."o"'~'--it---.lt
6728
City Hall, Anaheim, California = COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963~ 3:00 PoMa
area to be considered.
Mayor Coons stated that in the past, the area considered has been
the three hundred foot radius.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte moved
that the public hearing be continu~d on~ week (May 21, 1963, 3~OO P.Mo) to
allow further circulation of petitions in the area. Councilman Krein
5econd~d said motion. MOTION CARRIEDo
-,
SIGN APPLICATION: Request of Melodyland Theatre for permission to erect six
directional signs at the following locations, together with plans and
Building Department report, was submitted:
l~ Approximately 600 ft. north of Orangewood Avenue on east side of
Harbor Blvd.
20 Approximately 150 ft. west of Rip Van Winkle Motel at the location of
the Katella entrance to the theatre (North sid~ of Katella).
3. Northeast or Northwest corner of Lewis Street, on the north side of
Katellao
4. Approximately 300 ft. east of Euclid on south side of Katella, over
the orange grove.
Sa Northeast corner of Chapman and Harbor Boulevard.
6. Northwest corner of Katella Ave. and State College Boulevard.
Mr. Ernest Moeller addressed the Council advising of the diffi-
culty people will encounter in locating the theatre without the assistance
of directional signs; that pre~sale of tickets indicate that many attending
the shows will be strangers to this area; further, none of the locations
requested are within rights-of-way.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Dick Osorio reported that the signs are to be six feet by
eleven feet"
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein,
permit for six directional signs was granted, as requested, for a period of
one year, and subject to Council review at the expiration of the year, and
further subject to the provision of the proposed sign ordinance, that the
signs are to be located within the center ten per cent of the property, and
are to be no higher than the distance of the sign to the center of the
street. MOTION CARRIED.
TRACT NOv 4443 AND TRACT NO~ 4533: Request of Marlborough Homes for a waiver of
the Code provision requiring the construction of a six foot chain link fence
where residential property adjoins real property used for agricultural pur-
poses, was submitted.
(Tract 4~43 located at the northwest corner of Sunkist Street
and Wagner Road, and contains 35, R-l lots - Tract 4533 located on the north
side of Wagner Road, west of Sunkist Street, and contains 21, R-l lotso)
The City Clerk reported that a verbal request has been received
at open meeting to hold this matter until just prior to recess at 5:00
OVClock PaMo As persons were present interested in this issue, request to
defer the matter was denied.
Mr. William Montague, lessee of Ci ty'-owned property located on
Sunkist Avenue, addressed the Council relating the damage done to the orange
grove and the difficulties encountered resulting from the adjacent residen-
tial tract, due to lack of fencing. He further advised that he had purchased
and installed barbed Wire fencing as a protection and a deterrent to the
youngsters coming in, which hasnUt stopped them. In his opinion, in all
fairness to the orange grower, Marlboro Homes should be required to construct
the fence.
';;;_',,",,',',"~,,;A..__..'"""" ~.7>:IW.,,,....,,._..~,~,,,,-
';""'___i _,,,j.
6729
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3~00 P.M.
ment~
Mr. Geisler advised the Code provisions concerning said require-
Mr. Ronald Lushing, representing Marlboro Homes, advised that
this requirement was one that they were not aware of when the subdivisions
were built, nor were they includ~d in the subdivision bond; that all
improvements are completed, and in their opinion, the barbed wire fencing
met the requirement. He further advised that many prospective purchasers
would not consider purchasing a home adjacent to a chain link fence.
Mayor Coons stated that because of past experience where a
subdivision is located adjacent to a citrus grovet and because of the
damage to the grove resulting by no fault of the subdivider or the citrus
grower, the hardship created to the citrus grower necessitated the pro-
vision of a chain link fence as a minimum requirement for the protection of
the citrus growers interest.
Mr. Herman Lenz, representing his father-in-law Mr. Wagner,
stated he was of the opInIon that the chain link fence was a requirement,
and further reported some of the area presently has brick wall fencing. He
felt if the subdivider would question the purchasers, they would find that
most of them would prefer the brick wall fencing, instead of the chain link
fence.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein moved said
request for waiver of Code requirement be denied. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(Councilman Krein left the meeting, 4:20 P.M., and returned
4: 25 p. M. )
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-54: Request of John H. Kinney, Jr., for release
of bond filed in conjunction with reclassification for the construction of
improvements, Lot 23 in Block 1, Tract 419, was submitted.
Mr. Maddox reported that the sidewalk portion of Condition No. 1
of said reclassification has been fulfilled; that the bond posted included
both a sidewalk requirement and a fence requirement, and in his opinion,
construction of a fence is no longer necessary. He thereupon recommended
release of said bond.
Because these requirements are a condition of the Ordinance
reclassifying subject property, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded
by Councilman Chandler, that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare
necessary amendment to the Ordinance, eliminating the fence requirements,
so that the bond can be released.
RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-29: Request of Elise Fritz, owner of Parcel No.9,
Reclassification No. 62-63-29, for clarification and/or amendment of
Condition No.6, regarding dedication of a twenty-foot alley to the City
of Anaheim by owner of Lot 102, and Parcel No.9, was submitted.
Mr~ Murdoch recalled that Condition No.6 was included as a
requirement to provide circulation from Broadway to State College Boulevard;
further, the sketch as submitted appears to meet this requirement, and would
be a better solution than the one originally included in Condition No.6.
Mr. Maddox advised that they would have no objection to the
realignment; however, he was not certain at this time that the sketch now
under consideration is the same plan previously proposed and reviewed by
his office~
Mr. Edward Rogers, General Contractor representing Mrs. Fritz,
advised that they were prepared to meet all of the conditions of the
resolution, that the property owner of Lot 102 has made the statement that
he would not dedicate the required ten feet for the alley; further, the
house located on Lot 102 is not ten feet from the property line, as a result
the alley requirement can not be met in accordance with the resolution.
He stated if the alley could be located as shown on the drawing, it would
permit the property owner to better utilize their property, and also
alleviate an acute turn in the alley.
~"'~',"''i>",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,=,,,,,,,'''~;';<\\':...~,.,,,,~.,..,^~
6730
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.MQ
Mr. Rogers r~port~d that they would like to start the building
as soon as possible, and asked if a building permit could be authorized
at this time.
Councilman Chandler stated he personally would not object to
the starting of the building, with the assurance that they would construct
the alley at a location approved by the City Engineer, and in accordance
with the City EngineerUs specifications.
Mr. Kreidt called attention to Condition No. 10, which requires
that a site plan incorporating the alley and also removal of the house be
approved by the City Council, and suggested a joint meeting be held with
the planning staff and City Engineer and applicant, to draw an adequate site
plan for further Council review. In his opinion, the present plan would be
impossible to considerq
It was determined that the suggested meeting be held, and that
approval and issuance of building permit be withheld pending the working
out of a satisfactory solution, and thereupon, Councilman Schutte moved
that this matter be deferred one week (May 21, 1963, 3:00 O'Clock P.MQ).
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(Councilman Schutte left the Council meeting, 4:32 PQMQ)
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-123 - TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT 4757: Reclassification No.
61-62-123 was submitted for the purpose of clarifying Condition No.5 of
Resolution No. 63R-305, pertaining to fences, whether the fence was intended
to be constructed on the R-l property adjacent to the alley, or on the alley
property, and also to further clarify the description of the area to be
reclassified R-3, and the area to be reclassified C-l.
The City Council determined the following:
l. The developer furnish the City a legal description of the area to be R-3
and a legal description of the area to be C-l.
2. Condition No.5 was intended to require construction of fences where
fences do not presently exist, and interpreted to mean an elongation of
fences that do exist on the abutting R-l property, and if consent
cannot be obtained from the owner of the R-l property to construct
said fence, the obligation of the developer is deemed to have been
fulfilled.
VARIANCE NOQ 1149: Pursuant to Resolution No. 5598, adopted November 3, 1959,
Variance No. 1149 was granted J. Dymmel, 4118 Guinida Lane~ Anaheim, (Albert
D. Roberts) permission to operate a new and used retail automobile sales
and service on property briefly described as located on the west side of
South Los Angeles Street, between Ball Road and Vermont Avenue. Said
variance was granted for a period of three years, subject to review by the
City Council at the end of the three year period in the event permanent
buildings have not been constructed, and development completed, in accord-
ance with plans which were a part of the original application.
It was reported that the property is no longer owned by the
original applicant, and that conditions of the variance have not been
met, that development has not been completed in accordance with plans.
Thereupon, the City Clerk was authorized to set said matter for Council
review, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton.
MOTION CARRIED.
LEASE - CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: Request of the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Company to lease a portion of the Off-Street parking lot on the north
side of Chartres Street for a minimum period of six months, not to exceed
twelve months, was submitted.
Sketch of the lot in question was presented by Mr. Murdoch and
discussion held concerning terms of the lease, and the benefit to the
people in the area by providing for the removal of cars from the street.
...:_,,_...",.,...._......'-.;IC'.....,. .'-'-,.;."-;,,,.,._,...._.T.~_:_,:.... -w-
6731
City HallQ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14. 1963. 3:00 PaM.
Mr. Murdoch reported on plans for the removal of the two
buildings on the north side of Chartres Street, thereby increasing the
facility by the time of the Christmas buying.
At the conclusion of the discussion, and on motion by Councilman
Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was authoriz~d to
prepare necessary resolution and agreement to lease said portion of the
lot for a minimum period of six months, and at the end of the six months,
the lease to be on a month-to-month basis, cancellable by either party,
upon a thirty day written notice, monthly rental to be $225.00; that the
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company pay for the cost of remodeling
that portion of the lot for their purposes, and also the cost of removal
of the isolation installed for their purposes, at the end of the lease.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER - BUSINESS LICENSE~ Request of St. Anthony Claret Church for waiver of
business license in connection with their annual fund raising bazaar May
17, 18 and 19, 1963, was submitted.
Reference was made to past policy, relative to local charity
operations; that is, wherever booths, rid~s or operations are conducted
by the organization themselves, or the organization receives a direct
percentage of said booths, rides and operations, the license fee has been
waived. If the rides, booths, etc. are operated by and the proceeds are
that of the operator, the license fee is charged.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
St. Anthony Claret Church was granted waiver of license fee, in accordance
with previous policy. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE ~ SIGNS. CENTRAL LIBRARY: Mr. Joe Jordan, Architect, submitted request
of the Library Board for approval of the purchase of signs for the Central
Library in the amount of $10,635.00, which is to cover the entire graphic
program of the interior of the library. He advised that the sign program
has now been detailed, and includes approximately forty major signs, and
approximately 100 smaller signs.
Mr. William Griffith, City Librarian, advised that this program
will obviate the necessity of a great amount of directional information;
that this is a part of the comprehensive development of the interior of the
library, and was generally reviewed by both the Library Board and City
Council at the time the plans for the library were being prepared.
He stated the Library Board felt this was a matter to come before
the Ci~y COJncll; that the bond money has been depleted because of the
addi ion of ~ne Dasement and sprinkler system.
ACTlon on said request was deferred for further study.
RECESS~ Councilmarl Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 ODClock P.M. Councilman
Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED,
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons :.;al1ed tne meeting ""to order (7:00 O'Clock PoMo).
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
p RESEW~~ ~
COUNC ILMEN; , Cnand er 9 Kre i n and Coons.
COUNC 1 LMEN ~ ') chi_r t t e .
CITY MANAGER; Keith A. Murdoch.
CIl'l A:TORNEY: Jcseph3ei-sler.
CliY CLERK~ Dene M. W:lliamso
CllY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons ed the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
If,e Flag.
~~""""_""~__-i,"'<C".';'"=""_"",,,==_~,,"'",,';,_,, " ...
6731 -A
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P~M~
RECLASSIFICATION NOa 62-63-50 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 330: Submitted by
Doyle and Shields, requesting a change of zone on Parcel 1 from R-A to C-l;
Parcel 2 from R-A 1::0 R-3; and further requesting permission to construct a
planned unit development and waive one story height limitations on Parcel 2;
property bri~fly described as located at the northeast corner of Magnolia
Avenue and Winston Road9 (1250-1332 South Magnolia Avenue).
Public hearing was held by the City Council February 26, 1963,
and continued to March 19, 1963, at which time said public hearing was
closed and applications and files returned to the Planning Commission for
review and recommendations of revised plans to be submitted.
-
Memorandum from the Planning Department advising revised plans
have not been submitted by the applicant nor reviewed by the City Planning
Commission~ was noted.
pr~sent.
The Mayor asked if a representative of Doyle and Shi~lds was
Mr. Larry Shields addressed the Council advising that their
Architect Mr. Wild was present, and that they had with th~m the revised
plans, and requested permission to present them at this time for action. He
further advised that they now requ~st multipl~ zoning on the entire parcel,
and have inclJded a fifty-four foot street surrounding the property, said
street to be dedicated to the City; that the density w~ld be approximately
twelve per acre.
Councilman Chandler stated he would like to see the revised plans,
as he was especially interested in the proposed fifty-four foot street.
Relative to the request for the entire parcel to be zoned R-3,
the City Attorney advised that the Council can grant a lesser included
use, but residential use is not permitted in the C-l Zone, and in his
opinion this would require readvertising and a rehearing.
Mro Shields requested the Council to act on the original R-3
portion of the application.
Revised plans were presented, and Mr. Kreidt, the developers and
Architect, were invited to the Council Table to review said plans with the
CIty Council.
It was noted that the revised plans incorporated an additional
parcel of property located at the sOt.theast corner, which was not included
in the application9 nor considered at the previous City Planning Commission
or City Council public hearings.
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-391: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-391
for adoption, denying without prejudice Reclassification No. 62-63-50.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDo (62-63-50)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCiLMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler'j Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-391 duly passed and adopted.
~;;"-'~"","-,-"~,~",""-_.,.,._..,,,,",'",,"..__._".,,.".._--~
'~'-"'~~'-+---<-,---_"_,,,,,,,,",.._......._c-,_.,~,,~....~,,,,",~
6732
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M,
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-392: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-392
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 330, without prejudice.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO~ 330.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-392 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO~ 1564: Submitted by Margaret Blackwell, Owner; Lynn
E. Thomsen, Agent, requesting permission to construct a three family dwelling
unit of less than 2,000 square feet per dwelling unit, and create a lot of
less than ninety feet in width, on prop~rty located at the southwest corner
of North and West Streets (1102 West North Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 717, Series
1962-63, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning
Commission was filed by Mr. Thomsen, requesting consideration of the lot
split only.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and advised that the
zoning and surrounding zoning is R-O. He summarized the evidence presented
to the Commission, and reported that consideration was given to the request
for a duplex development instead of a triplex, and also to the request to
consider the lot split only. Concerning action on a lot split only, the
agent for the applicant objected to the required Architectural Control, as
he had no plans of development for the two lots so created.
Mr. Kreldt referred to the letter filed by the applicant with the
City COLncll reqJesting consideration of the lot split only, and advised
that the appl~cant appeared before the City Planning Commission last evening
requesting an expression from them of what their action might have been,
had the original petition contained only the Idt split. The Commission did
not Tender an expression, as it was their opinion that the matter was now
properly before the City Council.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or the applicantYs agent wished
to address the Council.
Mr. Thomsen read from the min':1tes of the City Planning Commission
meeting held April l~, 1963, wherein, in his opinion, the Planning Commission
favored the lot split, but opposed the triplex or duplex.
He submltted a plan showing how it would be possible to construct
a dwelling larger than 2,000 square feet on the corner lot.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of the
petition, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to address the
Council in opposition.
Mr. Bernard Jordan, 1132 Park Avenue, referred to the petition of
protest filed with the City Planning Commission containing 79 signatures.
(Some of the signers of the petition stood in recognition.)
Mr. Jordan advised that the agent presently has the purchase of
the property in escrow, and that he himself lives in an R-O Zone on Dwyer
Drive, and is fully aware of the R-O restrictions; that the purchase of the
property was made with this knowledge. He further advised that before the
, r Q
6733
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14~ 1963. 3:00 P,M.
public hearing of the City Planning Commission, the agent entered into an
escrow to sell one of the lots in question.
Mr. Jordan noted the following three ~xc~ptions to the R-O Zone
requested: (1) Variance to the minimum lot width; (2) Less than the
minimum 2,000 square foot per family dwelling; (3) Requesting multiple
zoning in an area that many years ago was designated as single-family
residential.
Mayor Coons advised that the applicant has reduced his petition
to a lot split only.
Mr. Jordan briefly reviewed the history of th~ R-O Zoning of
this area, advising that in 1950, with the coming of many industries to
this community, the need for a highly restricted area where executive homes
in the upper price bracket could be built with assurance of protection,
was recognized, and as result, the R-O Zone established.
variance.
In his opinion, it would be a great mistake to grant said
Mr. Bob Ulrich, 730 North West Street, advised that his property
is approximately the same size as subject parcel, and requested the City
Council to retain the property as it presently exists.
Mr. Morrie Stone, 1105 Park Avenue, owner of the property
immediately south of subject property, advised that he was most interested
in the type of structure intended, and it seemed reasonable to him to
require architectural control. If the residence to be built was reasonable,
he would have no objection; however, because the size of the lot would have
a major influence on this, he could not see how a house of 2,000 square feet
could be constructed if the lot was split as proposed to the City Planning
Commission.
Mr. Thomsen called attention to the fact that there are other lots
in the R-O Zone similar to the two lots proposed; that a home has been built
in the area in the last two years on a lot of less than ninety foot frontage;
that a templet has been submitted of a possible 3,500 square foot home;
further, that by the nature of the R-O Zone, he would be restricted to a
10,000 square foot lot, and a minimum 2,000 square foot home.
He further advised that he appreciated Mr. Stone's concern, and
agreed to give him the right to approve any plans for the residence
adjacent to him.
In answer to Councilman Chandler's question, Mr. Thomsen agreed to
submit building plans for the two lots to the Architectural Control of the
City.
Mr. Murdoch reported another item to be considered, not necessarily
in the granting or denying of the lot split, but the City does have a pro-
posal to change the alignment of that intersection, because of the rather
hazardous situation at this intersection. The realignment, however, would
require a dedication from this corner in order to make the safer intersection.
Sketch of the proposed realignment was submitted, and Mr. Thomsen
was invited to the Council Table to review said sketch.
Mr. Murdoch further advised that after dedication, both requested
parcels would be in excess of lO,OOO square feet.
The Mayor asked if anyone else had any new evidence to offer, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Murdoch advised that the purpose for the dedication and
realignment of the street is to make a safer intersection, and recommended
the City install the improvements on the North Street frontage, in exchange
for the dedication.
'~.<'-""'~""ic-"-~""'''-';''C__'''''_''''''~'''''_''~''--;'''''';',,-.,."""""""\IT
-
-~-"_""""''*';''_'"'_:''~_''''''''''_''''''''_'''''>~'L'~'''
6734
City Hall_ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14.. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-393: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-393
for adoption, granting the lot split in accordance with the dimensions as
shown on the plans submitted, and specifically d~nying variance on the size
of the buildings and for the multiple dwellings requested, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for West Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of
the City Engineer. Preparation of street improvement plans and the
installation of street improvements with the exception of sidewalks on
the North Street frontage, to be by the City for the dedication of the
necessary property for the street realignment.
2. Dedication of required property as indicated on drawing marked "Exhibit
A", to accomplish the street realignment at the intersection shown
thereon.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on North
Street and West Street.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
5. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Items 1, 2 and 3.
6. Filing of deed restrictions to be approved by the City AttorneyUs office
providing for Architectural Control by the City Architectural Control
Committee.
7. Filing of a Record of Survey.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING THAT PORTION
OF VARIANCE NO. 1564 PERTAINING TO A LOT SPLIT TO PERMIT THE CREATION OF TWO
LOTS HAVING A FRONTAGE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED IN AN R-O ZONE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUN:ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUN:ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-393 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-82: Initiated by the City Planning
Commission to consider change of zone from C-2 to R-3, property located at
the southwest corner of Center and Cherry Streets.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 670,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
l~ Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the building permit. .
2. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Center
and Cherry Streets prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Repair of sidewalks and curbs on Center and Cherry Streets in accordance
with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City
Engineer, prior to Final Building Inspection.
Mr. Kreidt explained the basis on which the City Planning Commis-
sion initiated said action, that includes lots on both sides of property
on which a variance has been approved for an R-3 use, then permitted in
the commercial zones.
6735
City Hall. Anah~im. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on this
issue, there being no response, declared th~ hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-394~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-394
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone from C-2 to R-3~ in accordance with the City Planning Commissionvs
recommendations.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-82 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILME~ None.
COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-394 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 62-63-94: Submitted by George P. McClain,
Owner, requesting change of zone from C-2 to C-3, property located at the
southeast corner of Los Angeles Street and La Palma Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 715,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Repair of curbs and damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on La Palma Avenue
and Los Angeles Street in accordance with the adopted standard plans on
file in the office of the City Engineer.
2. Removal and/or reconstruction of substandard driveways on La Palma Avenue
and Los Angeles Street in accordance with the adopted standard plans on
file in the office of the City Engineer~
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
5. That the owner of sUbject property place on record standard City of
Anaheim C-3 Deed Restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which
restrictions shall limit the use of subject property to a used car
sales lot or any C-2 Lses.
6. That the existing structure on the northerly portion of subject property
shall be limited to offices in conjunction with the used car sales lot~
and that any modification of the existing building shall be subject to
approval of Development Review.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location and zoning in the immediate area and
summarized the evidence considered by the City Planning Commission. He
advised that the C-3 Zone was recommended to be limited, because of the many
present undesirable uses permitted in the General C-3 Zone, which would be
incompatible to the area.
In calling attention to Condition No.6, Mr. Kreidt advised that it
was the desire of the Commission to upgrade this portion of the City.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to addr~ss
the Council.
Mr. L. J. Holt, Co-owner with Dr. LeGrand Spencer of subject property,
addressed the Council~ He explained their future plans, that within approxi-
mately one or two years, all buildings would be removed and the property
developed to its ultimate and best use for both the City and them. In his
opinion~ this will be a key corner with the extension of La Palma Avenue,
~",.....-"-- '-'~":~":.".+"~,......-."".=
6736
City Halla Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14~ 1963. 3:00 PQM.
and could well set the future pattern of development in this area. He
furth~r advised that anything done on the property at this time is
done only to keep the property self-supporting, and is considered
temporary. In his opinion, the C-3 Zone should be granted in order to
assist in attracting the highest type business that could be established.
Mr. Holt called attention to Conditions 1, 2 and 5, and related
the similar situation in another City, where he owned and developed a
used car lot costing approximately $20,000, and within two years, the
money spent for the used car lot was lost by the development of a perman~nt
apartment-hotel on the property. The used car lot being, in all probability,
very temporary, Mr. Holt felt Condition No. 5 should be omitt~d.
fhe Mayor aSked if anyone else wished to addr~ss the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Disctission was held regarding possible incompatible use of the
property in granting an unlimited C-3 Zone, and also the duration of time
that the present building will be used.
Mro Holt further advised that no lease is being given for more
than one year, as they felt within -two years something should be done in
the way of improving the corner.
RESOLUTION NOu 63R-395: Councilman Chandler offered R~solution No. 63R-395
for adoption9 authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resol~tion Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TlTLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-94 ~ C~3)
On rol call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo-te:
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-395 duly passed and adopted.
On motion ov Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
the applicant was granted permission to post a two year bond, guaranteeing
the compliance of Conditions Nos. 1 and 2, excepting therefrom the require-
ment -to repair hazardous sidewalks. MOTION CARRIED~
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 319: In conjunction with the recommended approval
of Reclassification No. 62-63-94, the City Planning Commission recommended
termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 319, permitting a retail tire
serVlce on Lots 1 and 12~ pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 62R-113.
It was determined by the City Council that the applicant now has
the option of leasing th.e property under the terms of Conditional Use Permit
No. 319, or leasing the property for a used car sales lot under the terms
of Reclassification No. b2-63-94. Therefore, it was moved by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that the Council take no action at
this time to terminate Conditional Use Permit No. 319. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-99 AND VARIANCE NOQ 1566: Submitted
by Ray W. Grimm, Owner, M. L. McGaughy, Agent, requesting change of zone
from R-A to R-3 to permit the establishment of a two~story multiple family
sUbdlvisior} on property located at the southwest corner of South and Sunkist
Streets; and fcrther requesting waiver of the one-story height limitation
and block wall requirements. (Tentative MaP3 Tract No. 4101)
II
6737
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 720,
Series 1962-63, r~commended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant
to Resolution No. 721, Series 1962-63, denied Variance No. 1566.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and existing uses
in the area. In referri~to Plan Study No. 45-114-4, Exhibit No. 2~ he
noted that the subject property is recommended for low density projection;
further~ said plan study indicates how subject property might so be developed.
-
In summarizing the evidence submitted to the City Planning Com-
mission, Mr. Kreidt advised that the basic objection was the incompatibility
of land use and the injection of an R-3 development in a basically low
densi ty area.
Th~ Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present.
Mr. Grimm, owner of the propertY9 addressed the Council, stating
that he has lived in Anaheim most of his life, that he has worked this orange
grove for the past thirteen years, and it used to yield an average of approxi-
mately five hundred boxes per acre; however, with the coming of the school,
the church and subdivision, and the loss of fruit caused by the children, his
last yearVs crop barely paid expenses.
He noted that the area is designated on the General Plan as
residential, and advised that it was anything but residential surrounding
his property, calling attention to the elementary school, the junior high
school and the church~ and also calling attention to the proposed Orange
Freeway, to be approximately 500 feet east of the property.
Mr. Grimm sta'ted that at one time, the property was to be sold to
the City for a park site; the terms had been agreed upon9 however prior to
the finalization of 'the salej the City determined a parcel further south
would better serve the purposes.
He stated that prior to the development of the school and church,
he had many inqulrles and offers to sell the property for single family
residences, and since the developments~ there have been hardly any inquiries.
Mr. Grimm further advised that he has seen Mr. McGaughy's develop-
ment and noted the need for rentals to teachers of the schools. He stated
that his aunt, uncle, and mother9 as well as many friends, still live in
the area~ and he would not allow anything to be built that would not be a
credit.
Mr. Mel McGaughy, 910 South Western, Anaheim, California, developer
and builder of the proposed project, advised that they anticipated building a
very deluxe9 low-density development9 being twelve per acre, and in his
opinion, they would be as nice or nicer than anything in the area.
Mr. Dick Kampl~.lg, 2240 East South Street, referred to the approxi-
mately 85 acres within the area for school sites, and was of the opinion
that a garden-type apartment development would be ideally suited for the
property, and recommended Council approval.
MrQ Herman Lenz, resident and owner of property on South State
College Boulevard9 noted that some of the home owners association disapprove
the apartments, and called attention to the proposed freeway, which in his
opinion, would act as a natural barrier. He favored the request, and
recommended its approval by the City Council.
Mr. Kenneth Lae, 609 Colt Street, presented the petition of
opposition containing 123 signatures of people within a four-block radius
of the proposed apartment development. He advised that their concern is
whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the area, and called
attention to the undeveloped property in the area, feeling if one in-road
was made, a precedent would be established for other developments of a
like nature.
-"~_~~,;=,,,"o,,,,<''''''~'__''_'C:''''-'-C~'~'_..~...,~_~~
6738
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14~ 1963. 3:00P,M.
Mr. Lae further advised that the area is all R-l low density,
and to grant the application would not be in conformity with th~ mast~r
plan. He recognized that some people prefer and enjoy apartment living,
but felt that this particular development would be best suit~d Som~ other
place.
MrQ Fred Paulus, 2528 Standish, advised that the same recommen-
dations of denial have b~~n voiced to the City Planning Commission, and
noted that the Planning Commission recommended denial.
Mr. Clay Smith, 2534 Standish, referred to a similar proposal
submitted to the City Council last year, and remembered that the City
Council denied said request. He further advised that they purchased their
home in this area according to the City's plan, that the area and still
undeveloped land would remain R-l.
Mr. Ralph Ball, 612 Colt Street, one of the circulators of the
petition of protest, advised that he could assure the gentlemen favoring
said request that his neighbors do not want the apartment d~velopment.
Mr. Grimm called attention to the street frontage purchased by
the State, and the StateVs plan for the proposed Freeway, that South Street
is proposed to go over the Freeway, and the property will rise, starting
from the corner. Regarding the establishment of a precedent, he felt the
Council would evaluate each request on its own merits.
The Mayor asked if anyone had any new evidence to offer, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NOG 63R-396: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-396
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 62-63-99.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDG (62-63-99)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN ~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-396 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-397: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-397
denying Variance No. 1566.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO.
1566.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNGI IMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schuttew
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-397 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5101: Subdivider, Mel McGaughy; tract contains 21
proposed R-3 lots on property described in Reclassification No. 62-63-99.
The City Planning Commission denied said tentative map.
'~"""""~''';'.'~o;;,;~~1;.,,,,,.,,,...--;!i=,, ',> _.~.;~.~,.~"",,",.,,.,, ....
iIIIIII!!I!III. "",.~~,,*,,-.,,~ t~
6739
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P~MQ
Mr. McGaughy addr~ssed the Council requesting permission to
withdraw said tract.
On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein,
th~ app1icant~s request to withdraw Tentative Tract No. 5101 was granted.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fift~en minute recess. Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDQ (9~05 P.MQ)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order9 all members of the
Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Schutte.
PUBLIC HEARINGQ RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 62-63-100 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 405:
Submitted by Kiyoshi Nakamura, Owner; LeRoy Rose, Agent, requ~sting a change
of zone from R-A ~o R-3, to permit the establishment of a multiple family
planned residential development, with carports, on property locat~d briefly
on the south side of Orange Avenue, approximately 664 feet east of Beach
Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 722, Series
1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-100 be denied, and pursuant
to Resolution No. 7239 Series 1962-63, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 405.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the subject property, and also
noted the development in the immediate area. He advised that the abutting
property has been purchased for a school site. In summarizing the evidence
presented and considered by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Kreidt called
attention to Finding No.4.
present.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or the applicantUs agent was
Mr. Harry Knisely, representing the applicant, addressed the
Council relating the statistics appearing in the evening paper, as follows:
That Anaheim has a 7.3 vacancy factor, that apartments are occupied by 2.3
number of persons; that 19.8 persons occupying apartments are under age 18.
Mr. Knisely noted the zoning in the area, and advised that this
is proposed for a low-density development of 13 per acre, of the highest
quality; that the units are to contain from 1,050 square feet to 1,200 square
feet each, and the only two-story structures are the studio apartments which
have bedrooms on the second floor.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that
the two.-story structures were located in the center of the project, surround-
ing the pool area, and that the plan indicated 104 units on an approximate
nine acre parcelQ
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mrso Edith Etong owner of property adjacent to subject property,
advised that she spoke for herself and her neighbors, who were opposed to
this request.
She called attention to the proposed twenty-foot roadway, and the
number of cars that would be traveling this road, which would be directly
behind their bedroom windows. She also objected to the proposed location of
the trash areas, and called attention to the difference in grade between the
two areas, which could create a drainage problem. In her opinion, the
property would accommodate approximately forty houses, and as there were no
factories or other large businesses requiring concentrated housing, requested
the area remain R-l, in accordance with the advice they had received when
purchasing their homes.
Mrs. Shirley Caton, 619 Bronwyn Drive, advised that this was
basically a residential area, and is so indicated on the map in the Planning
Department. She stated that the area has many young couples and young
families who want to raise their children in a quiet neighborhood, and called
attention to the danger to the small children crossing Orange Avenue to
~:~~",-..,.=.,.,."."",- -"""""''''i~-'.-i'''''''''!.II!II'l!ilii~''-.
-.T
-
i+~",",''''~4!<s'.;~~;c=--""~~' _
6740
City Hall~ Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14_ 1963. 3:00 PQMQ
attend the primary school~ as in her opinion, Orange Avenue would be
carrying most of the traffic from this housing development.
Shirley D~tjen, 2943 West Orange Avenue, called attention to
the fact that Orange Avenue is a very heavily traveled street, as it is,
and in her opinion, apartments on the subject property would be detrimental
to all of themo
Mr. Knisely, in rebuttal, felt the noise problem was answer~d by
the statistics published, which indicates that there will be an adult
population, and not children. He compared the 124 units at 203 persons,
or a total of 285 persons, with an R-l development, which in his opinion,
would result in a greater density than th~ proposed R-3 development.
Regarding thIs area being residential, he again called attention to the
C-l Zoning to the West, and the school to the South, and was of the opinion
that the proposed development would be a good transition in keeping with
good planning"
Mr. Knisely further advised that the Architect was present, if
there were any questions.
The Mayor asked if anyone had any new evidence to offer, there
being no response~ declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NOo 63R-398: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-398
for adoptiong denying Reclassification No. 62-63-100.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF -i-HE CI:~Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT !\ ChANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDQ (62-63-100)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES~
NOES~
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNDILMEN:
COUN::::ILMEN~
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
ihe Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-398 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOM 63R-399: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-399
for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 405.
Refer ~o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF fHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI fY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO 405.
On roll call The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES;
NOES~
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC.J.: LMEN ~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton~ Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
SchUtte.
fhe Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-399 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-101: Submitted by Elmer A. Preston,
Owner, requesting change of zone from C-2 to C-3, to permit the establishment
of a used car sales lot on property located at 1221 North Harbor Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 724, Series
1962-63, recommended C-3 reclassification, subject to the following
conditions~
rf
6741
City Hall, Anaheim_ California ~, COUNCIL MINUTES ,= Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
10 Dedication of fortY-five (45) feet from the monumented c~nterline of
Harbor Boul~vard (~O feet existing).
2G Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Harbor Boulevard in accord-
ance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City
Engineer"
3. Provision of a three (3) foot overhang easement along the westerly
boundary of the s~bject property to adequately serve the subject
proper~y and other properties, at the time of the installation of the
service facilities.
4$ Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. l~ 2, 3 and 4.
5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No.1.
6. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of Harbor Boul~vard, plans for said landscaping to be submitted
to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Main-
tenance, and said iandscaping to b~ installed prior to Final Building
InspectionQ
7. Recordation of C-3 D~ed Restrictions~ limiting the C-3 uses of subject
property to Jsed car sales lot only or any C-2, General Commercial~
uses.
8. Construc~ion of a six (6) foot masonry wall, measured from the finish~d
grade level of s~bject property~ along the westerly property line,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
-
I
MrQ Kreidt briefly summarized the evidence submitted to and con-
sidered bi ~dle Ci ty Planning Commission~ resul ting in their recommendations
that the C-3 use of the property be limited to used car sales lot, or any
other C-2,.:.se 0
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present.
Mr. E. A. Preston, owner of thp property, addressed the Council
advising that he originally requested C-3 Zoning, and was informed that an
application could not be taken at that tlme9 but than an application for a
Conditional Use Permit could be considered. As, in his opinion, the condi-
tional use permit would be limiting, he requested the C'~3 Zone)) which would
be on a broader basisQ He further advised that he now finds that he has
exactly the same thing, with two additional requirements, one being the
requirement of a masonry wall, and if this requirement for the fence cannot
be eliminated, he wo~ld request withdrawal of the application for rezoning,
and continue operationdnder the present Conditional Use Permit.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Troge, 1220 Raleigh, resident across the alley at the rear of
subject property, reported one of the conditions imposed was that the lights
were not to shine in the adjoining properties. He advised that the lights
do shine on his property, and that the noise from the lot is annoying. He
further advised of the installation of glass along the top of his fence, at
a cost to him of $125000, 'to provide a further protection.
Mr. Troge requested a survey be mad~ as the blacktop installed
slants to the alley; and further requested for the protection of the property
owners in the area, that the fence be installed and restrictions imposed to
control noise and lightsa
Conditions imposed in the granting of Conditional Use Permit No.
370 were submitted and read.
Mr. Preston stated he felt the gentleman had little complaint,
because the subject property was zoned C-2 long before his property was
even subdivided. Regarding the requirements of the conditional use permit,
he advised he has only had said permit for six weeks; that during the six
week period sidewalks have been installed, and that he expects to meet all
requirements within the 180 day periodo
There being no further questions from the City Council, the
Mayor declared the hearing closed~
~,7,:,;~.,.,;;;,.,...,:",."",i"L"<""~"C"",.,"c....'~
U.'....._lii...'i'iii...~"..."';
6742
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M.
lightingG
Further discussion was held concerning Mr. Troge9s objection to
Mr. Preston explained their method of lighting, and further advised
regarding the noise complaint there hasn9t been anyone there, that the lot
hasn9t been opened; however, th~re has been a used car lot for many years
on the property adjoining to the South.
Mrs Preston was advised that the Code prOVISIon requires that lights
be so arranged so as not to shine in the adjacent properties.
RESOLUTION NOv 63R-400: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-400
for adoption, denying without prejudice Reclassification No. 62-63-101.
Refer to Resolution Booka
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER:-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBEDa (62-63-101)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COU~ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-400 duly passed and adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 370: In conjunction with the recommended
approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-101, the City Planning Commission
recommended the termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 370, permitting
the establishment of a used car sales agency, pursuant to City Planning
Commission Resolution No. 639, Series 1962-63.
It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that the Council take no action on the City Planning Commissionvs recommen-
dation concerning the termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 370.
MOTION CARRIEDu
Mr. Preston advised that the V.C. has requested permission to
install a billboard at the rear of the property, which would shut out the
light from the adjacent area, and asked if this would be permissible.
Mr. Preston was advised that such a use would not be permitted
under the present conditional use permit; that another application for this
specIfic use w001d necessarily have to be filed and processeda
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-102: Submitted by Roy Ford, Owner;
Ken Himes, Agent, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l to permit the
establishment of professional office buildings on property located at the
northwest corner of Manchester Avenue and the Anaheim City Limits (adjacent
Melrose Abbey Cemetery).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 725,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Manchester Avenue, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
2. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Man-
chester Avenueo
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
6743
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.MQ
4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. land 2.
5. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3,
as amended herein.
6. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along th~ north, west and
south boundaries of subject property prior to Final Building Inspection.
7. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of the Manchester Avenue right-of-way and a minimum six (6)
foot strip of landscaping abutting the Manchester Avenue property line,
plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said land-
scaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
..-.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the subject property advising that
the property is adjacent to the City of Orange, with the Melrose Abbey property
adjacent to it to the North; further, that th~r~ was no opposition expressed
at the Planning Commission hearing.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or the applicantVs agent wished
to address the Council.
Mr. Ken Himes, 1555 Baker, Costa Mesa, presented a rendering of
the proposed project, explaining that this is to be a two-story professional
office building, containing 14 suites.
evidence.
of it.
Mr. Himes was asked if the rendering was going to be presented in
He replied that he would replace the rendering with a photograph
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NOo 63R-401: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-401
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Booka
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-102 - C-1)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-401 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-103: Submitted by John and Rita
Phipps, Owners; LeRoy Rose, Agent, requesting change of zone from R-O to C-l
to permit the establishment of a professional office in an existing structure
on property located at the northwest corner of Katella Avenue and the
Flood Control Channel (1557 Katella Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 726,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Dedication of sixty (60) feet from the monumented centerline of Katella
Avenue (40 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Katella Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of the City Engineer.
l"",",..';i~_._.,,:_'.....-..:'~
6744
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May l4~ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
3. Payment of $2.00 p~r front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella
Avenue (40 feet existing).
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Tim~ limitation of one hundred and eighty days (180) for the accompliSh-
ment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No.1.
7. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north property
line, prior to reclassification of subject property.
8. Recordation of C-l Deed R~strictions limiting the use of subject
property to business and professional office use only.
9. Provision that at such time as the northerly portion of subject property
is proposed for commercial development that plans be submitted to the
City Council for approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
10. Provision that renderings shall be submitted to Development Review
indicating the proposed changes of the front elevations for commercial
use of the existing structure, for report and recommendation to the
City Council in time for the public hearing on subject petition before
the City Council.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the
City Council.
Mr. LeRoy Rose, Architect and agent for the applicant, addressed
the Council submitting a rendering of the proposed development as requested
by the City Planning Commission. He advised that the existing residence
will be converted to commercial standards.
Mr. Harry Knisely, appearing in the capacity of a neighbor,
addressed the Council advising that he approved said reclassification.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NOG 63R-402: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-402
for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing
the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commi ssion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-103 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-402 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING_ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-105 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 408:
Submitted by Grace Elizabeth Dickerson, Owner; Marquis E. Pitman, Jr., Agent,
requesting change of zone from C-l and R-A to R-3, to establish a two-story
multiple family planned residential development, with carports, on property
briefly described as located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, extending
to Broadway, between Wayside Place and Date Street East (1608 East Lincoln
Avenue) .
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 727,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant
to Resolution No. 728, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit.
'Ir_",,'<'(<;,''''''''''__''_i'''~'''''_''''''~_''_ _._....,~.~.,.,_._""',....~.
-.. '",~",,~
If T
6745
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14_ 1963_ 3:00 PQM.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, noting the existing
zoning in the area, and summarized the evid~nce submitted to and considered
by the City Planning Commission. Reference was made to a petition of
protest filed with the City Planning Commission, signed by 85 persons.
Mr. Kreidt further reported that the developer had requested a
continuance of the public hearing, and was not present at the City Planning
Commission hearing. The Planning Commission elected to hear the issue, as
scheduled.
present.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or the applicantVs ag~nt were
Mr. Del Walton, Marjan Development, agent for the applicant,
advised that on April 23, a letter was submitt~d outlining why they felt
this was a logical use for the property (copies of said letter were
previously furnished each Councilman).
In answer to Councilman DuttonVs question, concerning the corner
parcel omitted from the proposed development, Mr. Walton advised that Mrs.
Dickerson was retaining that parcel for a future home site.
Mr. Leon Rudeman, representing the Architectural firm of Hai C.
Tan, Architect and Associates, Fullerton, advised that they were engaged to
do a study on subject property.
He presented renderings, several elevations, floor plans and lay-
out of the proposed project, which were reviewed by the City Council.
Lay-out and three typical renderings were placed on the east wall of the
Council Chamber for all to review.
Mr. Rudeman explained that the traffic will be cut by means of
the two cul-de-sac streets shown; that all the two-story units will be
concentrated on the C-l portion of the property, the balance of the property
to be single-story construction. Each unit will have a private patio, and
will be very much like single family residential in character.
Mr. Rudeman advised that the density will be approximately
twelve units per acre.
It was noted that 36 units would be constructed on the property
presently zoned C-l, the balance of the property to have 46 units, and
that of the total 82 units, 29 per cent of the total project will be two-
story.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mr. Stanley Hankins, 223 Wayside Place, requested verification of
the accuracy of the map indicating the C-l portion.
Mayor Coons explained that some time ago, a request was considered
for C-l on the entire parcel, and at the public hearings the City Council
reduced the C-l to the zone line indicated on the map, which was in continuity
with the existing C-l on Lincoln Avenue.
Mr. Hankins compared the density anticipated for the proposed
project with the existing housing in the area, which are constructed on
60 feet by 100 feet lots. He stated that the density proposed by the
development was actually twice the existing density in the area.
He further advised that he represented the 85 persons who signed
the petition of opposition; that assurance was given prior to purchasing
their homes that they would be guaranteed the privacy and advantages of a
low density area. Mr. Hankins was of the opinion that the development would
increase taxes in the area, and would result in the depreciation in value
of the R-l resIdences in this particular section.
~,C""~';I.""""""'.::;:;;;;^"",';,;.,,,,:;,,.;>,.,,,~,~;,j,o~_~~',ii'~v
.",,,-~......
-
-I
6746
City Hall_ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mrs. Dorothy Sheppard, 1701 E. Elm Street, submitted and read
a petition of protest, explaining the six reasons as expressed therein.
Mr. Tupper Lockhart, 205 Wayside Place, presented a poster
indicating the reasons he felt apartm~nts should be disapproved:
(1) Incompatible with land use, considering the established residential
on three sides of subject property; (2) Density proposed, comparing R-l
to the R-3 Zone; (3) Objectionable to all the surrounding homes, as
indicated on th~ petitions filed; (4) Privacy; (5) Theft and vandalism
(related a theft experience while a resident of an apartment house);
(6) Traffic; (7) Neighborhood pride.
In conclusion, Mr. Lockhart advised that the proposed develop-
ment will result in a less desirable neighborhood for the r~sidents
living there; that the property will depreciate, resulting in an economic
loss to them.
On the positive side, the poster indicated how the property
could be developed as C-l on the Lincoln Avenue frontage, and the rear
portion develop~d into an R-l tract of eighteen lots. In his opinion,
this type of development would be valued over one-half million dollars.
He asked the Council to compare this with the potential losses that will
result should the proposed project be approved.
Mr. Leon Rudeman, in rebuttal, stated that the proposed project
will not depreciate the area; that in fact in many cases, they are an
assistance in increasing property values in certain areas. He referred to
the statements made that the property is R-l, and noted that the property
is R-A, which he understood was considered a holding zone. Mr. Rudeman
further advised that a parcel of property on a seventy-five year lease and
not in fee ownership cannot be financed for R-l development, and that
calling the property R-l will not in fact make it R-l.
Statistics were related indicating .008 children go into this
type of garden apartment development, which percentage is considerably less
than an R-l development.
Mr. Rudeman felt, with all the arguments presented, that these
people will be happy with this development, when it is completed.
Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that
plans presented this evening differed from plans considered by the City
Planning Commission. Report of the Planning Staff concerning said plans
was considered. Also noticed was the creation of an R-A parcel on the
southeast corner, of less than one acre, contrary to Council policy.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman
Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, that the entire revised set of plans
and entire matter be referred back to the City Planning Commission for
further consideration, with specific instructions that they consider that
portion noted "Not a Part Of", located at the southeast corner, and omitted
from the original application, and to consider the higher density to prevail
on the present portion zoned C-l; the southerly portion be given additional
consideration as to compatibility with the surrounding area, and the
additional filing fees to be the responsibility of the developer. MOTION
CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present with the exception of Councilman Schutte.
v~~".,-....."".",..,,_._,,_~,....,..........c>"C"_"'.'__'~""~'P'"_",'"! .... "1
-';'"',..._~11it .. ~ .. TI",,".L -.
6747
City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14_ 1963. 3:00 P.M.
SALARY RECOMMENDATIONS - FISCAL YEAR 1963-64: Mr. Roy Heissner, Personnel
Director, distributed to each Councilman Salary Recommendation booklet for
the Fiscal Year 1963-64. He advised that the adjustment would cost
$280,596., representing an increase of 4.3 per cent of the current payroll
of $6,500,000., and represents adjustments ranging from no recommended
increase to a ten p~r cent increase.
Mr. Heissner outlined his recommendations and explained the
method used in arriving at said recommendations, which were based on
fifty bench mark positions of private emploYment, together with other
surveys, to determine comparable salaries in the appropriate labor market.
Mr. Murdoch was asked to comment on the recommendations. He
advised that one meeting was held in compiling some of the figures, and
that he did have some concern in some areas; that there were certain
classifications he would like to analyze further.
As this was the first opportunity the City Council has had to
review said recommendations, it was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, said recommendations be received for study, in conjunction
with recomm~nded work rules (copies to be furnished the Employees Associa-
tion and other interested employee groups), and that next Tuesday evening
(May 21, 1963) after conclusion of the Council business, an informal
discussion concerning this matter be held. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOo 63R-403: On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works,
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-403 for adoption, awarding
Job No. 758 to Iota Corporation ($37,678.08).
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN EAST STREET, FROM THE RAYMOND
STREET RETARDING BASIN SOUTHERLY APPROXIMATELY 1940 FEET TO SYCAMORE STREET,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 758. (Iota Corporation, $37,678.08)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
Dutton~ Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-403 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOo 63R~404: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-404 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND
DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR TYPE
OF WORKMAN, OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS, FOR THE FURNISH-
ING OF ALL MATERIALS, PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
BROADWAY STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4812.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-404 dUly passed and adopted.
'it~,~'~'""""'...._<'i."',,,,,,,~_,~ '"-'''-.-''~-'';h.._.""~~;,,,...:,"-..::p r__~jjiii.jr_.""';,, ~
~
6748
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14. 1963~ 3:00 P.MQ
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-405: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 63R-405 for
adoption.
R~fer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BROADWAY STREET IMPROVE-
MENT, FROM LOARA STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 991 FEET WEST OF LOARA STREET, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4812; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be opened June 6, 1963, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
.~
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-405 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-406: On the certification of the Director of Public Works
that Sully-Miller Contracting Company has completed the construction of the
Miller Street Improvement, Job No. 747, in accordance with plans and
specifications~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-406 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF MILLER STREET,
FROM ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO PLACENTIA YORBA BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 747. (Sully-Miller Contracting Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUN:ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-406 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-407: On the certification of the Director of Public Works
that Sully-Miller Contracting Company has completed the construction of the
State College Boulevard Street Improvement, Job No. 733, in accordance with
plans and specifications, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No.
63R-407 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND
WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD, FROM APPROXIMATELY 416 FEET NORTH OF SANTA ANA STREET TO
APPROXIMATELY 221 FEET NORTH OF SANTA ANA STREET, AND FROM APPROXIMATELY
1176 FEET NORTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO LINCOLN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 733. (Sully-Miller Contracting Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
'~:o--,-',(~';~.::L"-::;;"':'''-~..__'e~_~,>;;.
-~~--.'.,"",
fl
6749
City Hall. Anaheim. California -,COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14. 1963. 3:00 PaM.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNC I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-407 duly passed and adopted.
EXTENSION OF TIME - JOB NOa 742: On the recommendations of the City Engineer,
extension of eight working days with contract completion date to be March 15,
1963, on Job No. 742, was authorized on motion by Councilman Chandl~r,
second~d by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIEDo
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-408~ On the certification of the Director of Public Works
that McClain Construction Co., Inc., has completed the construction of
the Ball Road and Dale Street Intersection Storm Drain Improvement, Job No.
742, in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Krein offered
Resolution No. 63R-408 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution BOOK.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN AT
THE INTERSECTION OF DALE AVENUE AND BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB
NOQ 742. (McClain Construction Co., Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-408 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOG 63R-409: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-409 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT
SUBMITTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY TO INSTALL
AND MAINTAIN A TEMPORARY STORM DRAIN INLET IN THE RAYMOND STREET BASIN AT
LA P ALMA AVENUE"
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-409 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-4l0: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-4l0 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WITH REFERENCE TO A GRANT OF EASEMENT ALONG
ANAHEIM ROAD FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
\
~
-;.~~~..."~,~",,,,4'~' ,
~~""~"""'~~:i1~."~_0Ii!I"'oIfii!ij,,,,-,,,o,c~'" J
-
6750
City Hall~ Anaheim. California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14_ 1963. 3:00 P.M,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUOCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-410 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-411: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-41l for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH
THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR A LICENSE TO USE
CERTAIN LAND OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A STORM DRAIN.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-41l duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO" 63R~412: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-412 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY; RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY POWER LINE OVERHANG
PURPOSES OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS A PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME
AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF
AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION" (Public hearing June 4, 1963, 3:00
P. M. )
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-4l2 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-413: COGncilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-413 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH
THE NORTHERN ORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL, COUNCIL NO. 37, REGION XII, BOY SCOUTS
OF AMERICA, FOR fHE USE OF LA PALMA STADIUM FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A
SCOUT-O-RAMA~
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-413 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-414 to 63R-427,
both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
67~1
City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14. 1963~ 3:00 P.M,
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-414: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Moten M. Dizney, et ux; Maude A. Dizney)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-415: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Wayne E. Halda, et al)
RESOLUTION NO, 63R-416: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Carl W. Yost9 et ~X)
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-417: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Herman J. Hamner, et ~X)
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-418~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Carl Kapfer, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-419: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERlY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Gertie L. Bennett)
RESOLUTION NO" 63R-420: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(David J. Muckenthaler, et a1)
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-421~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(David J. Muc~enthaler, et al)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-422:; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASr~MENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Ronald S. Muckenthaler)
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-423: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Glenn p. Fry, et ,~;x)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-424: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Robert E. Kennedy, et uX)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-425: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING A
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. (Edward
W. Clasen, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R~426: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Anaheim Union High School District)
'''',~'''.lIIlb-".~'"""",~""_,;_,,',,.'...,i:,:"'c.:o.~.''--_"._....-'''<'''-_M~~'.-'.......
-~~,~~*,,-,,,,,:;--,~-,,~-~..~,..-.
6752
City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-427: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES.
(Orange County Flood Control District)
On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nose 63R-4l4 to 63R-427, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOo 63R~428: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-428
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Assembly of God of Anaheim, California)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COU~ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-428 duly passed and adopted.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY:
(a) Claim filed by frank Bedford on behalf of son, Ronald Alan Bedford, for
injury sustained January 26, 1963, while playing basketball, was
submitted.
Said claim was denied and ordered referred to the City Attorney,
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION
CARRIED.
(b) City Attorney presented claim against the city filed May 1, 1963, by
Bruce N. Osterhout on behalf of Melvin T. Morressey for money or
damages due resulting from accident February 14, 1963, at the inter-
section of Katella Avenue and Ninth Street.
'fhe City Attorney advised that in his opinion, the claim was
insufficient under the provisions of Section 711 of the Government Code,
and pointed out said insufficiencies.
It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that it be the finding of This City Council that the claim as filed is
inadequate under Section 711 of the Government Code, as nowhere in said
claim is any fact referred to which would, in any way, give rise to liability
on the part of the City of Anaheim; further, that the City Attorney notify
the claimant of the twenty day period provided for the filing of a proper
claim. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION
CARRIED:
a. Murchison, Cumming, Baker and Velpmen - copy of letter to Crane Ambulance
Service.
b. Nortronics, M. Eo Skilling, Plant Engineer, letter of appreciation.
c. Feather River Project Association - Agenda.
d. Anaheim Committee for the ~ymphony Association of Orange County.
6753
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14~ 1963. 3:00 P.M.
e. Invitation, Orange Co~nty Firemenis Association Annual Fire Show,
May 253 1963.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS~ Financial and Operating Reports for the month
of April, 1963, were ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman
Kr~in, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1850~ COJncllman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1850 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING PARAGRAPH 3
THEREOF, BY ADDING THERETO PARAGRAPH 23, AND BY DELETING THEREFROM
PARAGRAPH 4. (No ParkIng, Loara Street and Crescent Avenue)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1850 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler mov~d the
reading in fGll of said Ordinance be waivedQ Councilman Dutton seconded
the motiono MOTrON UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll ca 1 The foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo~e:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
COUNCILMEN~
COUl\C I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Dtitton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons dec ared Ordinance No. 1850 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1848: COtdlC-,-~man Dl-:tton offered OrdInance No. 1848 for final
reading.
Refer to Ord nance BOOk.
AN ORDINANCE OF ~;HE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3~ CHAPTER 3.44 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION TO BE NUMBERED
3.44.030. (4% Motel-Hotel Room Tax)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1848 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None"
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1848 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOm 1849: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1849 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1837 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62~82.
After hearing read in fGll the title of Ordinance No. 1849 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion" MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
;:-~~~"',ii:"':Cii,"">+","""""",,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,~,,-_,,-.:t,,,...,.<:o. """J:T'
6754
City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 14_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M.
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
COUN:ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1849 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOo 1851: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1851 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGo (62-63-76 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1851 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED&
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1851 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO" 1852: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1852 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-97 - C-2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1852 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ACCESS RIGHTS: Dedication of vehicular access rights by Charles Levy and Ida
p. Levy on or to Harbor Boulevard (Lot 99, Tract 1453), filed in compliance
with Condition No.9 of Resolution No. 63R-146 (Reclassification No.
62-63-57), were accepted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIEDo
ORDINANCE NOo 1853: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1853 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIP AL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-57 - C'-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1853 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED&
LEGISLATION:
(a) Assembly Bill No. 2571, regarding use of public funds for advertise-
ment of the City by contracting with private organizations.
It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Dutton, that a letter be written to our legislators in opposition to the
proposed bill, on the basis that it is an infringement on the home rule
principle. MOTION CARRIED.
(Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 11:55 P.M.)
~"'"~"'"'''''''''''''''''''='''''''''''=''''''-'_-'''''H''C;;'"''_''''
I I
6755
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mav 14. 1963. 3:00 PaM,
(b) Assembly Bill No. 1194 - Firemenis Bill. It was reported that a
telegram has been sent regarding the Cityis position on this measure.
(c) State Constitutional Amendment 18. On motion by Councilman Dutton,
seconded by Councilman Krein, letters to our legislative representa-
tives was authorized, supporting State Constitutional Amendment 18,
placing the proposal of the Telephone Utility Tax to the vote of the
peopleG MOTION CARRIEDa
(d) Assembly Bill 1491. Letters were authorized supportlng Assembly Bill
1491 - Hotel Occupancy Tax, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded
by Councilman KreinG MOTION CARRIED.
(e) Senate Bill 344. Mayor Coons reported that Mr. Koch, County Road
Commissioner, has indicated this bill is going to receiv~ favorabl~
action in the Assembly.
CITY PERSONNEL LIST: Request received from Assemblyman William Dannemeyer fOT
list of City employees for the purpose of sending questionaires regarding
certain legislation affecting ~hem, was submitted.
The Personnel Director was requested to prepare and forward
requested listo
JOINT RECREATION AGREEMENT~ Mr. Geisler advised Resolution No. 63R-385 was
adopted May 7, 1963, authorizing a contract between the City of Anaheim and
the Anaheim Union High School District, regarding the recreation program
in the Cypress School Districto He further advised that this contract is
a contract in connection with the joint recreation program between the City
of Anaheim, toe Higl1 School District and the Elementary School District,
and since we do not have a contract from all of the schools for the joint
recreation program, recommended the signing of the contract authorized
pursuant to ResolJtion No" 63R-385 be withheld until negotiations are
consumateda
It was moved by Counc Iman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that no further ac~ion be taken until the balance of the contracts are
received. MOrION CARRIEDo
PUBLIC UTILITY HEARING ,- EDISON COMPANY RATE INCREASE: Mr. Geisler reported
that before a formal agreement authorized by the City Council February 5,
1963, could be prepared and executed between the City of Anaheim, the
Southern California EdIson Company, and Zinders and Associates for the
engagement of expert witnesses necessary in the Edison rate increase case,
the case before the Public Utilities Commission was heard and the services
were rendered. The total charges are in the amount of $1,534.93, of which
one-half is to be paid by the City of Anaheim.
On motIon by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein,
the City Attorney was authorized to approve and pay Anaheimvs portion of
said bill from the Publit Utilities budget of that department for the
services rendered by the two special professional witnesses called. MOTION
CAHRIED.
ABANDONMENT: Discussion was brief held by the City Council concerning the
possible abandonment of certain Streets north of La Palma Park, where it
appears that the City of Anaheim is owner of property on both sides of the
street.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motionq MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 12:00 P.M.
SIGNED:
~ /x. ~~
City Clerk
"-""~'"'-''''''''''''"'''''''''''<_'''_.~''__.';C, _ __~_',,"-,~,,":;~"""'~'...;,_..,..,.,~.