Loading...
1963/06/18 6822 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18~ 1963~ 3:00 P,M, The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ ABSENT. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte and KTein. COUNCILMEN: Coons. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: JoSeph Geislero CITY CLERK: Dene M, Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddoxo CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR. Homer Wallace. ZONING COORDINATOR~ Martin Kreidt. .~ Mayor PyO Tem Chandler called the meeting to order. SIGN APPLICATION ~ PANCkOiS FAMILY RESTAURANT: Application submitted by Pancho's Family Restaurant for permission to erect non-conforming sign in an area including nine stores~ 2806 West Ball Road9 was continued from the meeting of June 119 1963~ to allow submission of a plot plan, and inspection of similar Pancho's Family Restaurant sign presently existing at another location. My. E. C. Agnew9 Santa Ana Neon Company, reported that the appli- cant intends to place the sign so that there will be no projection over the property line9 and other store signs in the area will be integrated on the same pole. COJncilma~ Krein moved said sign req~est be granted, subject to removal of the existing 5ig09 and any future signing for the shopping center to be integrated on the new sign, further9 said sign shall be located within the center ten per cent of the property, and shall have no projection over the property lineo Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN APPLICATION - GLOBAL VAN LIN~S: Application submitted by Global Van Lines for permission to erect a temporary non-conforming sign at 750 West Ball Road9 was continued from the meetIng of June 11, 1963, to this date to allow a representative of the applicant to be present, and to resolve possible conflict wIth the Landscaped Freeway Ordinance. ~he City Attorney reported that he had reviewed said matter with the attorney for Global Van Line5~ Mr. Floyd Farano, prior to this meeting; that the :ssue was whether or no't the sign was designed to be maintained for the p~rpose of being viewed primarily from the Freewayo Mr. Floyd Farano9 Attorney for Global Van Lines9 9100 East Garvey, South San Gabrie19 submitted photos taken from the Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road overpasses at the Santa Ana FreewaY9 said photos indicating the area where the sign will be located. Mr. Farano advised that the sign would not be easily viewed from the Freeway as it would be restricted by the two overpasses, but was designed to be seen from those streets serving the Disney- land area. He further advised the angle of the V-shaped sign has been reduced from 900 to 650 or 7009 and is directed primarily at the overpasses. He further advised that this temporary sign would be removed upon completion of the building, whIch is scheduled for October 28, 1963. Councilman Dutton moved that said sign request be granted for a period of six months; that based upon the evidence submitted, it is the finding of the City Council that this temporary sign will not be constructed primarily to be viewed from the Santa Ana Freeway; that it is intended to serve the Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road overpasses, and is to be removed at the time the building structure is completed. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUESTS - GARDEN PARK GENERAL HOSPITAL AND ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: Requests of Garden Park General Hospital and Anaheim Memorial Hospital for directional hospital signs were continued from the meeting of June 11, 1963, to this date to allow report and recommendation from the Director of Public Works. ~i:'""~*,,,~''';,"''';,~.'i:J',:,,'u;;~-_,,,,~__:;j;;:~',,; 6823 City Hall, Anaheim, Ca~ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18~ 1963, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Muy~och read a detailed report submitted by Mr. Piersall, Public Works Direttor, reporting that there are four emergency service hospitals maintaiming personnel on a twenty-four hour basis, which would be eligible for directional sign requests, said report recommended the types and locatioms of signs and further recommended the adoption of a Council policy for administrative procedure to be followed fOT pyocessing hospital directiomal sign requests. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and at the conclusion thereof9 Councilman Krein moved that the City Council adopt the following policy as recommended by the Director of Public Works. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. nHospit~l directional signs may be placed, upon application and approval 9 for emetgency Hospitals. Application for signs shal1 be made to the Director of Public Works and shall b~ approved by him prior to installation. In the event the sign is to be located on a State Highway, the applicant shall obtain prior approval from the Division of Highways. The legend of the sign and location shall be approved by the Director of Public Works, the size shall be a maximum of 18" x 30". They shall be blue in color with white letters. No more than three signs shall be placed for anyone organization, nor shall they be furthey than one-half mile from the destination directed to, except when in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, exceptional circumstances exist. The requesting organization shall pay for the sign and its installation9 the Director of Public Works shall determine the material of which the sign is to be made. If the sign is damaged or deteriorated, the requesting organization shall pay for its replacement. The sign may be relocated by the City at any time it is necessary in the public interest, or to avoid conflict with official City signs. The officials of the organization shall satisfy the City that they are prepared to treat emergency cases 24 hours per day, they will have a licensed physician in attendance at all times and they will accept patients without prejudice relative to race9 religion, color or ability to pay." Mr. Dave Heeb, representing Anaheim Memorial Hospital, and Mr. Frank Hall, representing Garden Park General Hospital, approved the adoption of the above policy. Both gentlemen were advised to submit their requests for direct- ional signs to the Public Works Director, in accordance with adopted policy. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 195: Communication dated June 12, 1963, from W. D. Newman, was submitted and read in full, setting forth the problems which have been encountered in developing subject property, located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Dale Street, for a Jack-in-the-Box drive-through restaurant; advising a permit had been is'sued by the City Building Department for a 6 foot wall, construction to be measured from the highest grade on subject propertY9 and the foundation constructed to support a wall of that hei9ht~ Since there apparently is a difference of opinion as to what grade the fence height should be measured, the applicants requested waiver of any higher wall requirement. Mr. Horner Wallace, Chief Building Inspector, advised that the Building Department has interpreted that a six foot wall is measured from the highest grade level of the applicant's property. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and Mr. Murdoch reported that although they were of the opinion that a policy has been established for some time, wherein a 6 foot wall should be measured from the grade on the highest side of said wall, a written policy of this nature has never been established. A similar condition has, however, been applied to specific situations. -"~"~""-""--""-"_:_~"""""""-""-'''''~"";..~-,,+,,...,,"":.~ r- 6824 City Hall~ Anaheim. California - GOUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Mr. Wallace was of the opinion that determination of where the height of a wall should be meas~red should be made by considering the purpose thereof; for example~ if said wall is to protect adjacent property from activities of a commercial property, measurement from the commercial owneris side is usually sufficient protection; however, if the wall is to separate R-3 development from an R-l development, this type of protection from the invasion of privacy might require a different policy. Mr. Wallace reported that in checking the development, the property was excavated and the installation of the black top on the parking area has reduced the height of the fence eight or nine inches; however the foundation of the fence would support two additional blocks and a cap. ~ MrQ Wallace also c~lled attention to the lighting situation, and noted the present arrangement would spill light into the neighboring propertY9 a sitJatlon that should also be corrected at this time. Attention was called to the location of a well site on the property which is now approximately 3091 higher than the balance of the property, which will result in dirt spilling onto the sidewalk on the Dale Avenue sideQ Mro James Morgan, Attorney representing Mr. Anderson, owner of adjacent property to the North, addressed the Council advising that according to a savings and loan company appraiser, Mr. AndersonYs property has been depreciated some $3,0000 b} the commercial development; that the wall requirement was primarily for the protection of the adjacent property. Further~ in his opinion, consideration should be given to three items: the lights, noise and view from both sides of the property. He stated that in the back yard of the Anderson property, the wall is three feet eight inches high, allowIng visibllity into the commercial establishment, and affords no privacy to the Anderson property. In their opinion, the wall sho~ld be raised to six feet on the Anderson side; however Mro Anderson wouid agree to the addition of two blocks, plus a cap. Further9 ~he ligh~s llnder the present arrangement are very unsatisfactory. Mr. Morgan further advised that Mr. Anderson holds 1/6 interest in the well9 altho;~gh he has connected and now uses water through the City water line; however9 the other five owners of interest are using said well. He called attention totne dangerous condition of the well and well site, and requested that some protection be placed around the exposed soil at the base of the wel~. Mr. Morgan noted that the sidewalk on subject property extends to the edge of Mr. Anderson's propertY9 resulting in more exposed soil, and requested Game sort of fence be constructed across said sidewalk. He was of the opinion that street widening dedIcation of the remaining two lots on the east side of Dale should be obtained by the City to complete widening of the roadway. In answer to Council questioning9 Mr. Anderson advised that the owners of interest in the well hold an easement, and do not own the well sIte property. Mr. Will Newman 3 2316 Fairhill Drive, Newport Beach, advised that the legal title specifies that the well site property is owned by twelve original parties, at least one of wh.om has expressed his desire to continue using the well. Mr. Ro L. Vain, 2814 Serrano Place9 advised that a two foot high retainIng wall is to be installed thirty-three feet along the Anderson property to the street, and a redwood retaining wall completely around the well. DiscLssion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof9 Councilman Dutton moved that the policy defined as to this particular lot be as follows: ~__,"-"-,;;;U(,,;;;;:;.,,~,'.;.C'...........,,.~.;"""'''' 6825 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18, 1963, 3:00 P.M, (a) Permitting a fence of a height which would add two additional blocks plus a cap on the north side of the property except for the l5 foot set- back area. That within the 15 foot setback area, conformance be to the policy and the interpretation of the Building Department. (b) From the end of the 15 foot setback fence area to the old street line a 2 foot high retainer wall be installed either of redwood or cement block. (c) That a 2 foot high retainer wall, either of redwood or cement block, be installed around the existing well site. Further, that a six foot high redwood fenc~ from the ground level of the developed property be installed around the well site. (d) That the lighting on the property be so directed that it does not shine into any reSidential property. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE COUNCIL ~ REQUIRED WALLS OR FENCES: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded ijy Councilman Schutte, the following policy was adopted by the City Council~ nIt is the policy of the City Council that wherever a six foot fence or wall is required as a part of the Zoning Ordinance or as a con- dition of development 9 the top of the wall shall be not less than six feet above the finish grade. Said six feet shall be measured at the face of the wall adjacent to the higher finish grade, along whichever side of the wall this may occur; except that the City Council may deviate from this policy for good cause shown." TAXI CAB PERMIT APPLICATION - AMERICAN CAB COMPANY: Application by Gene Rogers and Martin J. LockneY9 dba "American Cab CompanyH, was continued from the meeting of May 21~ 1963 to this date, for the furnishing of additional evidence of public convenience and necessity, and for investigation and report by the Police Departmenta Report from Chief of Police was submitted and briefed by Mr. Murdoch (copies duplicated for each Councilman). Communication dated June 179 1963, was received from Mr. Harry Drake, 2110 West Forest Lane9 Anaheim, in favor of subject application; communication addressed to Mra Eo A. Slagle, General Manager of Yellow Cab Company of Northern Orange County, Inc., from the General Manager of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce was also received, stating that in his opinion, the Yellow Cab Service is filling a definite need in the City in a satis- factory manner. Mr. Arthur GraY9 Attorney representing Mr. Lockney, advised that when asked opinions on the subject request, many people in the recreational area of the City felt that a public statement of their own personal opinions might prejudice the service received from the one taxi cab service. Further, he has been authorized by Mr. Messenger, Vice President of the Kilroy Company, to express his feeling that a new taxi cab permit should be gran+ed. He called attention to the fact that the only intra-city transportation for the public in Anaheim is the Yellow Cab Company, and further reported that on checking with the Visitors and Convention Bureau, it was found that the matter had not been discussed, and any opinion expressed in communication from said bureau (submitted at the City Council meeting of May 21, 1963) was the personal opinion of the writer. Mr. Gray referred to communications from the Disneyland Hotel and the Waikiki Motel supporting the American Cab Company application~ and referred again to the rapid growth of the City. Mr. Gray recognized the necessity for control, however felt that control would not necessarily limit this type service to one company. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in favor of said application. There was no response. "~;+~;Km",:.~.:..,.,;';':,o.""~._...;..,.:.~,,,",_~".;_.+-.";",.'-' '''V .;\:.' '.l. I 6826 City Hall. Anaheim. California - qOUNCIL MINUTES- June l8~ 1963.. 3:00 P,M, Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to subject application. Mr. Eo Ao Slagle, l6l9 East Center Street, President of Yellow Cab Company of Northern Orange County, stated that in his opinion the seventeen year length of service of his company in this area was a pertinent factor~ noting that they started the comrany with two vehicles, and made voluntary increases as it was felt there was a need for increase. Mr. Slagle advised that in comparing rates with larger cab companies9 including the Los Angeles area, during the years 1950-1962, his company rates ran from twenty cents to thirty cents lower than the prevailing level~ and still managed to maintain equal or better than average equipment and serviceo Mro Slagle pointed out his activlties with the transportation committee of the Visitors and Convention Bureau9 and noted that as a trial a local bus system was instituted to run locally from the motels to the recreation area, extending as far as KnottVs Berry Farm, which proved not to be a paying proposition. Mro Slagle submitted exhibits containing taxi cab rates from Yellow Cab of Newport and Costa Mesa, Inc.; Associated Taxicab Operators of SouthemCalifornia, Riverside, California; and Valley Cab Company of Van Nuys, serving cities in Los Angeles, Riverside and Orange Counties. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there was no response. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that the application of American Cab Company be denied. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler called for a roll call vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein. Dutton and Chandlero Coonso The Mayor Pro Tem announced the motion failed to carry, and advised those interested that Councilman Coons was expected to arrive some time during the evening portion of the meeting; that upon his arrival, another vote would be taken on this issue. Later in the meeting, approximately 9:00 09Clock P.Mo, Council- man Coons not having arrived, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, to continue decision on application filed by American Cab Company to the next meeting, June 25, 1963, 3:00 P~Mo MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - DUANEiS PIRATE CAV9RN~ Application submitted by Ray Spehar, 1031 North Euclid Avenue~ requesting permission to erect a free-standing pole sign, and a roof sign9 advertising Duane's Pirate Cavern, together with plans and report from the Building Department, were reviewed by the City Council. Barbara Hess, 1031 No. Euclid Avenue, advised that there is in existance a sign at the south end of the shopping center which was installed before the property was annexed to the City of Anaheim. She explained that the former tenant of the building had a sign at the north end of the property; that the wiring is already installed; and their sign would be a replacement of the former sign. In her opinion, to place a sign other than the location requested would cause interference with traffic and parking, as access to the shopping complex is in the center, the south end and from a side street. ~'A-~';j3:iWi;V,;";",,;.;",:,,,''''"''';''':'''-'''''f'ri,-.;.~,.."'.",-;,~ -.. .""""", 6827 City Hall. Anah.eim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M, Discussion was held by the City Council, and Miss Hess was advised of the Council policy of allowing one integrated sign for a shopping complexq advertisinq all business establishments in the shopping center, to be located within the center 10 per cent of the property for readability. Mr. James Nicola9 N.Y.E. Neon, Buena Park, requested that the sign be allowed placement on the south side of the driveway at the north end of the propertY9 which w01jld be close to the center 10 per cent, and reported that other tenants of the complex have been contacted and have approved this requested sign, but did not wish to participate in an integrated sign at this time. He advised that the sign was 4 feet by 15 feet in a vertical plane9 totaling 27 feet in height from ground level. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and at the con- clusion thereofg Councilman Schutte moved said sign request be continued one week (June 25, 19639 3:00 O'Clock PoMa)~ and that Mr. Spehar, owner of the property, be advised to appear at said meeting to discuss this issue, as there was a good possibility of only one sign being allowed for this shopping center, and if his future plans were for an integrated sign, arrangements should be made at this time; or if he is unable to be present, a letter of consent signed by Mr. Spehar wOll1d be sufficient. Councilman Krein seconded the motionJ MOTION CARRIEDa On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, sign to be placed on the northwest corner of the building was granted. MOTION CARRI ED 0 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT- ~~HE CARAVAN: Application filed by Joseph E. Stupy, M.D., for Entertainment Permit at The Caravan, 226 No. Manchester Ave., was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to the recommenda- tions of the Chief of Police~ on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. REQUESTS, 4% ROOM TAX E~EMPTION: Communications received from Mys. John Peterson, California Hotel, 231 West Center Street~ and Mrs. Lorella M. Macbeth, Manager of Angelina Apartments, 279 East Lincoln Avenue, requesting exemption from the 4% Hotel-Motel Room Occupancy Tax, due to the fact that their accommodations are almost entirely rented by the mcnth, were submitted. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney, and Mr. Geisler advised that the Ordinance specifies any operation holding itself as a hotel or motel is included in the provisions. On motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was requested to investigate said requests for exemption to determine if their operations were that of a hotel or apartment, advising the applicants accordingly. MOTION CARRIEDo The City Council further suggested if it is determined the two establishments were in fact operating apartments, that the names of the establishments be changed to reflect the true operation. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 61.62-124 AND VARIANCE NO. 1525 - TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS: Request to terminate proceedings of Reclassification No. 61-62-124 and Variance NOa 1525, as desired zoning of the property is in process pursuant to Rec1assiflcation No. 62~63-89, was submitted by Frank G. Turley. RESOLUTION NOo 63R-512: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-512 for adoption9 terminating all proceedings in connection with Reclassification No. 61-62-1249 in accordance with request. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-l24. .-",."",...-",<~"."....~~.",."..~ 6828 City Hall. Anaheim. California -~ COUNCIL MINUTES ~ June 18. 1963~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregolng resol\ltion was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte9 Krein and Chandler. Noneo Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-512 duly passed and RESOLUTION NOo 63R-513: CouncIlman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-513 for adoption, terminatin9 Variance No. 1525, in accordance with request. Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU!'(:;IL OF TH.E CITY OF ANAHEIM RESCINDING RESOLU- TION NOQ 62R-I093 GRANTING VARIANCE NOo 1525. On roll call the foregoing reso1Gtion was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUN:ILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Schutte~ Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adoptedo The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resol~tion No. b3R-513 duly passed and RELIGIOUS SERVICES - 1022 PAIT STREET: Communication dated June 5, 1963, from Rev. Antonio Alvarez, was submitted requesting permission to hold a one hour religious service In the front yard of l022 Patt Street9 Anaheim, each Sunday during the summer months. Rev. Antonio Alvarez, 17352 Oak Street, Atwood, California, addressed the Council explaining the nature of his work with the Mexican people, and urged Council approval of his request. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, request was granted in accordance with letter from Rev. Antonio Alvarez, dated J~ne 59 1963, to be conducted entirely on private property from this date to October 319 1963. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP~ TRACT NOo 4107: Developer, Ardmore Development Company; tract located 100 feet south of Catalpa Avenue, bounded on the East by Chippewa Street, on the South by the Orange County Flood Control Channel, and on the Southwest by Santa Ana Freeway, and contains 3 proposed R-3 lots. The City Engineer reported that conditional dedication of a street connecting Greenleaf and Glenoaks Streets has been received, that said Final Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previously approved, that bonds have been posted and approved, and required fees paid, and he recommended approval of Final Map, Tract No. 4107. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Final Map of Tract No. 4107 was approved, in accordance with the City Engineeris recommendations. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP~ TRACT NOo 5021: Developer, Mit-Mor Development Company; tract located on the north side of Wagner Avenue, 775 feet west of Sunkist Street, and contains 16 R-l lots. The City Engineer reported that said Final Map conforms substan- tially with the Tentative Map previously approved, that bonds have been posted and approved, and required fees pa'id, and he recommended approval of Final Map, Tract No. 5021. -'~-"-'-",~'~1jj!Ij.O":""':"""""~~'i . I 6829 Citv Hall, Anaheim.. California ,~ COUN:IL MINUTES ,- June 18, 1963. 3:00 P.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Final Map of Tract No. 5021 was approved, in accordance with the City EngineerVs recommendations. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOr ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 27, 1963, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONN~ USE PErMIT NO. 401 - Submitted by Isabel Foster Gamble, request- ing permission to ~stablish a rest home on R-A pyoperty located on the north side of Oran~e Avenue approximately 1170 feet west of Beach Boulevard, and further described as 3067 Orange Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 771, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PE~MIT NO. 424 - Stlbmitted by Japanese Free Methodist Church~ requesting permission to establish a church and related classrooms on R-.A property located on the west side of Mayflower Street, approximate 1 y 369 feet south of La Palma Avenue and further described as 1001 North Mayflower Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 776, Ser::es 1962,-,63 ~ granted said condi tional use permit, subj ect to conditions. VARIANCE NOo 1574 ... Submitted by Edward L. Wingett, requesting permission to waive the 1225 sq11are foot requirement on R-2 property located on the west side of Sabina Street9 approximately 440 feet north of North Street, and further described as 905 North Sabina Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 774, Series 1962-63~ granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO" 1576 - Submitted by Frank E. Koss, requesting permission to construct carports in conjunction with an apartment building on R-3 property located on the west side of Olive Street, approximately 189 feet south of Wilhelmina Street, and further described as 615 Noyth Olive Street. fhe City' Planning Commissio n pursuant to their Resolution No. 775, Series 1962-639 granted said variance, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PEIiMIT NOy 229 - Submitted by the Owen Company, establish a retail automobile dealership on property at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Los Angeles Street. SUbject petition was granted by the City Planning Commission on Apr. 30,1962, and the City Council took no action at their meeting held May 15, 1962. Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held May 27, 1963, was submitted, wherein revised plot plans were approved with the exception that the architect is to contact the Planning Department to resolve the proper slope and materials for the roof, and if any structural changes in addition to the roof line were needed, the Development review function of the Planning Department was authorized to approve the changes. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered variance applications and condi- tional use permits~ PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of seven sirens and control equipment for the civil defense program, as follows: Mobil-Directo BN~4E Model Biersach & Niederffiayer CO.9 Milwaukee, Wisc. $ 18,60.1.00 Federal T~underbolt 1000lT Model Gaines Electric Supply CO.9 Long Beach W. B. Equipment Co., Los Angeles Electric Supply Co., Garden Grove 20,400.00 20,789.65 20,822.00 ~"'~"''''i_'''''''''''.''',"," ~ 6830 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M, Federal Thunderbolt lOaOrT Model Continued: Halprin Supply Co.t Los Angeles Calif. Wholesale Electric, Los Angeles Graybar Electric Co.~ Anaheim Enterprise Electric Supply Co., Costa Mesa W. S. Darley Co., Chicago9 Illinois Federal Sign & Signal CO'9 Los Angeles $ 20,974.45 21,016.78 21,038.9l 21,186.00 23,975.00 25,764.82 Mr. Murdoch noted that of the ten firms submitting quotations, nine were for the Federal Thunderbolt 100011 Siren, and one was for a Mobil-Directo BN44E Siren, and further advised that the Mobil-Directo BN44E Siren has not been tested by the City of Anaheim, and the manufac- turers of both sirens have agreed to a comparative test to be conducted here. Councilman Krein moved that comparative tests be made in the City of Anaheim of the Federal Thunderbolt IOOOTT siren and the Mobil-Directo BN4~E Siren, and further9 consideration of purchase be deferred pending results of said test. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7~OO P.Mw Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED" (5:10 PoMo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tern Chandler called the meeting to order. PRESENT; ABS ENT : COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. Coons. INVOCATION: Reva Abbot 9 First Presbyterian Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALU~;E~ Mayor Pro Tern Chandler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARINGq CONDITIONAL USE P~RMIT NOo 244~ Request submitted by Elmer S, Child of Western United Land Corporation, to consider the addition of eight extra units to the motel located at 1800 Lincoln Avenue, granted pursuant to Resolution NOa 62R-937 on October 16, 1962, and further requesting the elimination of Condition No.9 of said resolution, reading as follows: 9. That two-story construction shall not project southerly from the north property line of that property presently owned by one Homer Wilson, if said north property line were extended easterly from its present northeast cornero The original file and plans were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if tl1e applicant was present and wished to address the Council. There was no response. The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to said request. Mr. Howard Sheldong 1754 Brentwood Place, addressed the Council in opposition, referring to the findings of the City Planning Commission in denying Conditional Use Permit No. 244, and to the evidence presented at the original hearing in October, 1962. He advised that the applicant has pro- ceeded with his building of the motel project, with kitchens in every unit called "wet bars~', and with the extra bedroom called "products display room"; that the residents in the area question whether the applicant9s intent was for a motel or sub-standard apartments, and they feel the proposed project will become a blight on the area. They also feel that the policy that the City Council has followed with reference to apartments in residential areas should be maintained, and that apartments should not be allowed to come closer than 150 feet to "R" dwellings. Mr. John D. Zaharson, 246 Brentwood Place, presented a petition signed by owners-occupants of property within the interested area, protesting the elimination of said Condition No.9, and also the amendment to allow the additional eight units. He advised that the group of residents he was repre- senting included more than sixty homes in the area, and they questioned whether the ultimate use of the subject property would be in keeping with the plans as originally submitted for a motel. At Mr. Zaharson's request, ~"",c~~"""","='''''',",i.;;""""""""",'~:'",:,,,~O''':''.;-,.".~: -.- ~'>;.":~- - 6831 City Hall" Anaheim~ Ca~ifornia ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P,M, several people in the audience residing on Embassy, Brentwood Place and Ech09 indicated their opposition by a show of hands. Mr. Zaharson was of the opinion that the Council, in granting Conditional Use Permit NOQ 2L14~ subject to the conditions imposed, has perml tted the max:i.mum use of .thi s land, and any further concessions or amendments would be a detriment to good planning; that the r~sidents f~~l the Council impos~d Condition NOQ 9 as a means to stop the encroachment of commercial development into their residential area, and that no addi- tional evidence has been submitted by the applicant to justify an amendm~nt to Resolution No. 62R-937 at this time. In referring to the applicant's request of May 129 1963 for the elimination of Condition No.9, he was of tb.e opinion that the "economic feasibilityi! of the units must have been established by the applicant prior to the start of the construction project. Further9 that this project is a departure from the normal motel construction requirements, in that normally twenty-five per cent of the units in a motel operation are equipped with kitchens or kitchenettes; however, in this case, every unit contains some type of kitchen facility. Also, that subject project has had numerous modifications without actual approval, and he called attention to the pool now existing on the premises within the 35 foot setback on Lincoln~ for which no variance permit was obtained. Mr. Zaharson advised that the residents on Brentwood Place are equally interested in subject project as those residing on Embassy and Echo, because of the unrlpveloped land lying between subject propeyty and the rear of the properties on Brentwood Place; that the residents also feel that the case before the Council, if granted, will tend to set the stage for continued encroachment on residential property by establishing a precedent as to the form of buffer to be provided betwe~n commercial and residential areas. In summary, Mr. Zaharson again reiterated the following statements: lQ Was of the opinion the property owner requesting the variance was not denied his property rights. 20 Condition No. 9 reaffirms the protection of residential areas within the 150 foot requirement on two-story abutting single-family homes. 30 That a careful review of the record of subject case leaves unanswered questions as to construction, type of use, variance, and intent of use. 40 Questioned whether the development is a motel or a sub-standard apart- ment fwuse. In answer to Councilman Dutton9s question, regarding the addi- tional eight 1:nits, being of two-story construction, Mr. Zaharson advised that on a personal basis~ the main opposition was the invasion of privacy; however9 all the residents in the area believe in good planning and zoning practices9 and they feel to allow subject request would establish a precedent that could be detrimental to all residential areas within the City of Anaheim. In answer to Councilman Chandler9s question as to what effect the subject development would have on the property fronting Brentwood Place~ My. Zaharson advised that their consideration was to the precedent. that would be established as to the buffer protection between residential and commercial; that if the Council chooses to amend the conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 24~ after a definite set of conditions has been established, then they have no assurance that the development intended for the vacant parcel immediately to the rear of Brentwood Place could not also be amended to include a similar use. Councilo Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if anyone else wished to address the Mr. Homer Wilson, 1797 Embassy Street, owner of the R-l lot adjoining subject property~ addressed the Council in opposition to the request for the additional eight units. He advised that they purchased their home knowing there was undeveloped land to the East and North, but felt that the City would protect their permanent residence. He stated that the motel construction is presently within 75 feet of their property line, and that there will be extra motel noise and activity in the near future with the only separation being a six foot wall; further, that the trash 6832 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. pickup was originally to be from Lincoln Avenue, however the applicant now has an easement through the office building property, east of subject property, so that trash pickup will be at the rear and nearer the single family homes. He questioned the parking facilities for the additional eight units, as parking was minimum for the original forty-four units. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Wilson stated that the two-story construction would result in invasion of his privacy and cause additional noise to the residential neighborhood. - Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if the applicant was now present and wished to be heardo Mr. Elmer Childsg contractor representing the applicant, pre- sented an artistVs rendering in color of the proposed motel, and advised that on the second story, very nice screening will be plac@d in a position to provide privacy for the residential lotsa He was of the opinion that because of the rapid growth of the area, that any undeveloped land fronting Lincoln Avenue wot:ld certainly develop commercially~ and felt that their request for the additional. eight units would place the best and maximum use on their propertyo He stated every effort will be made to protect the immediate adjacent R'~'l homes, and urged their request for the removal of Condition No.9 from the Conditional Use Permit, No. 24~, to allow the construction of eight additianaldnits, be granted. Mayor PyO T em Chandl er ask ed if anyone else wi shed to addre s s the Council~ there beir1g no response~ declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr. Geisler in answer to Council's question, advised that straight commercial zoning allows two-story construction with no setback limitations, however the locations involved and planning of the development usually determines the setback requirements. In answer to Councilman DuttonVs question, Mr. Childs advised that the motel construction would be approximately seventy-five feet from Mr. Wilsonvs propert~ line, and approximately ninety feet from any of his buildings. At the conclusion of Council discus5ion~ Councilman Krein moved the request for elimination of Condition No. 9 from Resolution No. 62R-937 and the construct:lon of eight additional units under Conditional Use Permit No. 24~, be deniedo Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler called for a yoll call vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein. Dutton and Chandler. Coons. The Mayor Pro Tem declared the foregoing motion failed to carry. Councilman Dutton moved the decision on Conditional Use Permit No. 244 be continued to July 2, 1963, 3:00 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING.. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO" 418: Submitted by James and Monica Lombardo, requesting permission for an existing apartment building to be rented on a daily, weekly or monthly basis on R-3 property located on the northwest corner of Vermont Street and Hampshire Avenue (549 West Hampshire Avenue) . The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 759, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by the applicant and public hearing scheduled. "~:.,-.,:",'\!!;.~Hr&<m;b:t.:.:.,,:.,.. d''-;'';;:,_",''~;'i...,'";d'4II\\,,,,:. ...,....:.4 . '""""" v-:-_...;:~ 6833 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963~ 3:00 P.M. The Mayor Pro Tern invited the applicant or their agent to address the Councila Mr. Phillip R. McGraw, Attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Council advising that in his opinion, the applicant now has a right to rent by the week, day or month; that the proposed and requested use is that of the motel use, to be used in conjunction with the motel that they own at 503 West Vermont Street (one block away) and will be providing the s,ame services and right to advertise in the same manner as any other motel. Mr. McGraw felt the requested use, that of a motel, was justified for the following reasons~ 1. The considerab~e traffic on Vermont Street, which will become heavier when Harbor Boulevard is widened. 2. There are three motel ~nits within a block of subject property. 3. The location of Carpenteris Hall directly across the street from subject property. He stated that the above conditions make it difficult to rent these units as apartments, as they cannot keep tenants in this property on that basis. Mr. McGraw further advised that in checking the file on this matter, the main objection apparently stems from noise which is contended generates from use of this property; that in his opinion, there was no basis for this, that any noise in that area comes primarily from the CarpenterVs Hall9 due to activities there; further, there has been no objection to the other motels in the area or the present one operated by the applicants.. He advised that some of the people in this area have no objections to the use of this property as a motel, including the owner of the apartment house directly to the rear of the parking lot of their present motel, and thereupon presented a petition containing six signatures, substantiating this statement. Mr. McGraw stated that the request made is reasonable and comes within the required showing of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The intended use wil1 not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or growth or development of the area; that there has been no showing to the contrary that the use of this property as a motel would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim; that the requested use of the property will not generate more traffic on Vermont Street, and no additions to the building are proposed - it will be operated as a six unit motel. He further adv~sed the applicants will comply with any reasonable conditions imposed by the City Council for the protection of other property owners and uses in the vicinity. Mayor Pro Tern Chandler announced his withdrawal from this issue, because of a possible conflict of interest, and requested Councilman Schutte to take the Chair, and thereupon withdrew from the Council Chambers. Council. Councilman Schutte asked if anyone else wished to address the Mrs. Charles Carr, owner of property located at 535 West Hampshire Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition, relating conditions observed and objections made by their tenants. In her opinion, this use was a threat to their income and investment. She further advised that the noise referred to did not come from Carpenteris Hall, and that Carpenter~s Hall was not located directly across from s.ubj ect property; further, if thi s use is approved, a precedent would be established forcing all the property owners to this use. ~"~~,;",~"""",,,,',,",,,_,":"='_O"_~'>"~'i"+,,,,,_' 'f 683.1 City HallQ Anaheim.. California c_ COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18" 1963" 3:00 P.M. Mrsa Mary McDonald~ owner of property at 528 West Hampshire Avenue, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that she was present at the City Planning Commission hearing, where th0 applicants were found to be in violation of the zoning ordinance, the motel ordinance and the protec- tive restriction placed 0pon the property; further, the City Attorney's office was instructed to see that this violation was stopped. Mrs. McDonald advised that the applicants have never ceased to operate the property as a motel, and thereupon presented a list indicating State and license number of vehicles, date moved in, date moved out, and length of stay, together with pictures. She further advised that they have lived with this situation for over a year, and was not interested in just a penalty for the violation of the ordinance, as the income derived would more than off-set the amount of penalty levied. In her opinion, the way to prevent the continued violation by the Lombardos without continued policing of this operation and entering complaints to the City of Anaheim, would be to stop the operation at the corner of Harbor Boclevard and Vermont Street, making it impossible to send the over-flow to their purely residential area. Mr. Dale McDonald, 528 West Hampshire Avenue, advised that there had been a CertaIn amount of noise from the Carpenter's Hall, however with the help of the City Council, it has been pretty much controlled. When Harbor Boulevard is widened, in his opinion, there will be less traffic on Vermont Street because Vermont Street is not a through street. He stated he would be interested in learning the signers of the petition favoring the use, due to the fact that practically 100% of the property owners have signed a petition in opposition. Mr. McDonald fJrther advised that many of the tenants arrive after ten o9clock P.Mo, creating a certain amount of noise and disturbance. Mr. Luke Miller9 516 West Hampshire Avenue, owner of duplex located directly to the rear of the existing motel, addressed the Council in opposition, advising of his experiences being in such close proximity to the existing motel, and the dIfficulties experienced by his tenants. In his opinion, unless the entire area is converted to the requested use, the expansion of this use should be stopped at this time. Mro McDonald questioned the Lombardos' inability to rent the building for apartments, and further advised that when the property was purchased by the Lombardos~ it was completely occupied and a two-weeks notice to vacate the property was servedo Mrs. Lombardo, owner of Royal Palms Motel and applicant, addressed the Council reporting that they have never had any trouble with their tenants nor complaints from their neighbors, and named those in the immediate vicinity favoring their requested use. She further reported on the con- dition of the apartment house at the time of their purchase, and the reason the notice to vacate was served was in order to clean the premises. Councilman Schutte asked if anyone had any new evidence to present, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Letters of protest filed, duplicated and furnished each member of the Council, were received from the following: Rene C. Mensehaert, 5~3 West Hampshire Ave., Dale W. McDonald~ 528~B West Hampshire Avenue, Helen M. Fassel, 539 West Hampshire St., Alta L. Richmond, 539 West Hampshire St., and. Ruby E. Webb, 509 West Hampshire St. RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-514: Councilman Dutton stated that the matter before the Council was a matter of zoning; that in his opinion, this would be an invasion of a commercial use in a residential zone, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 63R-51A for adoption~ denying Conditional Use Permit No. 418. Refer to Resolution Book. ~".'."',ii\~",~,""".'.";,.~"";~",.._,.._~","...~.,.",,,...;~~'i--':; ..- ...".... ! ~ ~"'-__"C'''-'''''''''''''"~"'''''''''''=_''_'' 6835 City HalL~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18.. 1963.. 3:00 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOQ 418. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following ~ote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: TEMPORAR[LY ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, and Krein. None. Coons. COUNCILMEN: Chandler. adopted. Councilman Schutte declared Resolution No. 63R-514 duly passed and Mayor Pro Tern Chandler resumed Chairmanship of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASS~FICATION NO~ 62-63-98 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 403: Submitted by Griffith Brothers, a partnership, and Mabel T. Douglas, Owners, (Thomas A. KeY9 Agent)~ requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to construct a multiple family planned residential development, waIving one-story height limitation, on property briefly described as located on the west side of Ninth Street, approximately 130 feet north of Kimberly Avenue (1677 South Ninth Street). The City Planning Commission pIJrsuant to Resolution No. 765, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 766, Series 1962-63, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 403. The Mayor Pro Tern asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Tom Key, Agent, addressed the Council advising that their plans were to develop a town house community, which would be a new concept in Anaheim; that there was much opposition to this, and as result the Planning Commission has recommended denial. Subsequently to this action, the City of Anaheim has indicated their intention to acquire the north four and one-half acres for a City park site, and for these reasons9 submitted a letter withdrawing Reclassification No. 62-63-98 and Conditional Use Permit No. 403, further advising that fine homes will be constructed on the remaining four and one-half acres. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, request to withdraw zoning applications was approved, and all proceedings terminated on Reclassification No. 62-63-98 and Conditional Use Permit No. 403. MOTION CARRIEDo PUBLIC HEARINGQ RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 62-63-104 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~07: Submitted by Dave Domries and E. T. Schroedl, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to construct a multiple family planned resi- dential development, waiving one-story height limitation, on property briefly described as located on the east side of Knott Avenue, approximately 805 feet south of Orange Avenue (706-714 South Knott Avenue). The Clty Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 750, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions~ 10 Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 and 40 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Knott Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott Avenue. 4. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 407. 6836 City Hall~ Anaheim_ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18~ 1963. 3:00 P.M. 5. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection. 6~ Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 7. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works~ Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 8. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 19 2 and 3. 9. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No.1: Exhibit Nos~ 1 thrm~~gh 5, except front elevations shown on Plan "A", shall be used for all structures. 10. Provision that a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and south boundary of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection. -, The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 751, Series 1962,-639 granted Conditional Use Permit No. 407, subject to the followlng condition: 1. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone, as approved and completed under Reclassifica- tion No. 62-63-1040 Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if the applicant or his agent wished to addre~s the Council. Mr. Warren Procter, 115 West Fifteenth Street, Santa Ana, Cali- fornla9 agent for Mr. E. T. Schroedl~ advised that pursuant to Variance No. 690, granted in 1957, an all-steel building was constructed to provide for the fabrication of formica drainboards; that the tenant of the building deceased approximately one year ago, and since that time, the property has been vacant. He further advised that at the time the variance was granted, the general area was Lsed for agricultural purposes. Mr~ Procter reported that he was retained for the purpose of sellirlg the propertY9 that it was highly advertised on the basis that there was a variance on the property for the fabrication of formica drainboards, and numerous inquiries were received, however most of them were interested in other limited types of manufacturing or commercial uses. He therefore agreed with the City Planning Commission in their findings that the land is no longer suitable for industrial use, and requested the reclassification be approved by the City Councilo Mayor Pro rem Chandler asked if anyone present wished to address the Council in opposition to the applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closedo RESOLUTION NOo 63R-5l5: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-515 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commissiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-104 ~ R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was dUly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES ~ NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: COUNC I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-515 duly passed and .J~F~j"a'~i'i;i..'J0""":"'""""',;,_"",'"'ai;.k,-:o~-"'_'"'Ii..-~,,;"'-""'T' 6837 City Hall<l Anaheim~ California - COUr-r:;IL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NOo 63~-516: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-5l6 for adoption~ granting Conditional Use Permit No. ~07, subject to the recommendation of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 4070 On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followIng ~ote: AYES~ NO ES ~ ABSENT ~ COUNC ILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayo~ Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-516 duly passed and PUBLIC HEARING.. RECLASSIIFICATION NOo 62-63-109: Submitted by Peter and Anne DeMann, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on property located on the east side of Western Avenue approximately 264 feet south of Ball Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 753, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 10 Dedicatiorl of forty-five (~S) feet from the monumented centerline of Western Aven~e (20 feet existing). 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Western Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. PaYment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Western Avenueo ~. Payment of a ParK and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. S. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of PUblic Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 60 Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 19 2 and 3. 70 Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. I and 2, except that the proposed twenty-five (25) foot two-way access drive shall be reduced to twenty-one (21) feet and a four (4) foot wide strip of landscaping shall be installed along the building side of the access drive. 8. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north, east and south boundaries of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection. The Mayor Pro rem asked if anyone present was opposed to said reclassification (there was no response), and then asked if anyone wished to ask any questions concerning the reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 63R'.517~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-517 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-l09 - R-3) -~~;..,"""".,,,,,,<,,~._,,._..,'.'*i......~.~ 6838 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-517 duly passed and PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION ~O~ 62-63-110: Submitted by Walter C. and Ruth S. Ralston, requesting a change of zone from C-l (restricted) to C-l (unrestricted); property located at the southwest corner of Sallie Lane and Euclid Street (1701 South Euclid Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 763, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if the applicant or his agent wished to be heard. Mr. Jack Gasho, 12721 Groveview Avenue, Garden Grove, California, agent for the applicant~ addressed the Council advising that when a site plan was presented to the Planning Staff, it was determined that this reclassification would be necessary because of the restrictions filed on the property limiting the use to business and professional offices. He further advised that all they' were seeking was permission to establish a pharmacy on the property as shown on the site plan. Finding No. 3 of City Planning Commission Resolution was noted, recommending that deed restrictions be amended to allow the pharmacy use. fhe Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 63R-518: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-518 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 62-63-110, and authorizing an amendment to Resolution No. 7009, pertaining to Reclassification No. 60-61-100, to provide for an amendment to deed restrictions, permitting the establishment of a pharmacy. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.. 7009 IN RECLASSIFI- CATION PROCEEDINGS NOo 60-61-100. (62-63-110) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-5l8 duly passed and On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, amendment to deed restriction filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 60-61-100 (Resolution Noo 7009) allowing the inclusion of a pharmacy use, was authorized. MOTION CARRIEDo ii.&:i"""~;~._:""".~'~""'4 6839 City Hall. Anaheim. Ca~ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P,M. PUBLIC HEARINGQ RECLAS~IFICATION NOo 62-63-111: Submitted by Edward N. and Mary Rose9 reques~ing a change of zone from R-l to C-l, property located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Street and Katella Avenue (1792 Carnelian Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 76A, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Knisely~ Attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Council stating that in his opinion, the basic denial of the City Planning Commission was due to the fact the deed restrictions on this tract prohibit the commercial use without consent of fifty per c~nt of the property owners in the tract. He fuyther advised that the applicant is presently contacting owners in the tract to secure their approval, and thereupon requested said public hearing be continued. Councilman Krein moved that the request be granted, and public hearing on Reclassification No. 62-63-111 be continued to July 16, 1963, 7:00 PoMa Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGq RECLASS~FICATrON NOo 62-63-113 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 423: Submitted by Everett H. and Elma M. Miller, requesting a change of zone from R-A and C-l co C'"~l and R-39 and also requesting permission for the following: (1) Construct multiple family planned residential development with carports. (2 Waive R-3 and C-l height limitations. (3 Establish a car wash. (~ ConstI~ct a three-story office building. Property located on the east side of Brookhurst Street, approxi- mately 1322 feet nortn of Ball Road, and on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 672 feet east of Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 767, Series 1962-63~ recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions~ 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road (50 feet' existing). 2. Dedication of sixty (60) feet from the monumented centerline of Brook- hurst Strept (30 and 50 feet existing). 30 Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Brookhurst Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. ~ InstallatIon of sIdewalks on Ball Road, in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the BuIlding Permit. 6. ProvIsion of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, SanItation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 423. 8. Recordation of a Final Tract Map on Portion "B" of subject property. 9. Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Brook- hurst StTeet. 10. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 19 2, 39 4, and 9. 11. Development s'Jbstantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 thru 21, except as amended herein. 12. Construction of a six (6) fo~ masonry wall around the periphery of the multiple famIly development as indicated on Exhibit No. 16, prior to Final Building Inspection. '''-'<<':~''''"''''~''.'''''-''<''''''''''--''_''''''''''''';''''_:'_'''_t'.,::~~ ;III"Iit~~>:,..-.-w-"".. ! 6840 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. ;~~.m..__ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 768, Series 1962-63, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 423, subject to the following condition: 1. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone9 as approved and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-113. The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone wished to address the Council favoring said applications. Mr. Edward Warmington, partner in the Brookmore Corporation, (Robert H. Grant) developers of the proposed project, addressed the Council stating that since the filing of the Tentative Map, Tract No. 5162, it was felt that the R-3 portion of the project shoUld be developed into two tracts9 and explained how the tracts could be divided. Mro Warmington further advised that in planning the area for the car wash, it had been recommended that 225 feet or 250 feet be provided instead of the 150 feet shown on the plans. Plans were reviewed by the City Council. Regarding division of the subdivision tract, Mr. Queyrel of McDaniel Engineering requested Council action on the tentative map as submitted, and advised that if at a later date, it is determined that the tract is to be divided, re-submission will be made to the City Planning Commission. Mr. David Gordon, President of Sherwood Forest Civic Association, advised that they were very much in favor of the proposed development, and that he has discussed this with those residents on Valley Street, who are most directly concerned; further, the Board of Directors of the Association are of the opinion that this would be a proper usage for the land. The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 63R-519: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-519 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commissiono Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-113 - C-l and R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: AB5ENT: CO UNC I LMEN : CO UM:: I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coonso adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-5l9 duly passed and RESOLUTION NOo 63R-520: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-520 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 423, in accordance with recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and waiving the height limitation to allow construction of two-story units as shown and designated on the plans filed in conjunction therewith. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4230 - 68A1 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18.. 1963.. 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-520 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP~ TR~T NOo 5162: Developer, R. H. Grant; property being two irregular portions of land with frontages on the east side of Brookhurst Street and on the north side of Ball Road, and contains 11 proposed R-3 lotso The City Planning Commission recommended Tentative Map, Tract No. 5162, subject to the following conditions~ 1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one 3ubdivision, each subdivision ttereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval a 2. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 423. 3. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone~ as approved and completed under Reclassification NOa 62-6.3-113. 4. Access to Minerva Avenue shall not be permitted. 5. Streets 'IB"' and Q'CqV shall be sixty-four (64) feet wide. 6. Dedication and improvement of "Not A Part". 7. Angle c~t-offs shall be provided on all alleys as required by the City Engineero 80 Dedication of access rights to Ball Road9 except at street and alley openings. 9. Provision of a modified knuckle at the northwest terminus of Minerva Street9 subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. The alley south of Street Q'N', shall be provided with a turn-around of the 'Valley to be dedicated by document", is to be included within the tract, 11. Lots 6 and 9 shall be noted on the title sheet of the map for recreational uses onlY9 since said lots are not buildable sites, and an exception must be granted~ as no alley serves these lots~ a requirement for R-3 lots. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Tentative Map of Tract No. 5162 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO" 62-63~114: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission recommending, pursuant to Resolution No. 769, Series 1962-63, a change of zone from R-A to R-3 on an I'L" shaped tract of land consisting of Lots 1 through 11, Tract No. 3258 (portion of Sumac Lane and Humor Drive, located north of Katel1a Avenue and west of Euclid Street). Mayor Pro Tern Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the reclassification (there was no response), and further asked if anyone wished to address the Council favoring said reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 63R-521: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-52l for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-11A - R-3) .~",-~..:."".:".k;;"'';;;'';';.::.:.c'_~''~''''~:'I'.'''~ 6842 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18~ 1963, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. The Mayor PTO Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-521 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1860: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1860 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-114 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1860, and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the read- ing in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tern Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Coons. RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-522: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-522 for adoption, awarding contract for Job No. 1265, the Santa Ana Canyon Sewer, to Orange County Pipelines, Inc., the low bidder, in the amount of $73,686.20. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST REPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 7,400 FEET EAST OF JEFFERSON STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NOo 1265. (Orange County Pipelines, Inc.) On Toll call the fOTegoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: CO UNC I Ilv1. EN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-522 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-523: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-523 for adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ANAHEIM ROAD, MILLER STREET AND DOWLING AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4813 APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 11, 1963, 2:00 P.M.) ~~.4Y;;~;,fu"~:i_.-~,;;Jf:Ji,hI~';':'I---' 6843 City Hall. Anaheim. Ca~ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor PyO Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-523 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO. 63R-52~: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-524 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM ACACIA STREET TO EAST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO~ Ill; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR 'THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 11, 1963, 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC ILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Kyein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-524 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO. 63R-525: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-525 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING HAROLD DAOUST, PURCHASING AGENT, OR PAUL L. HAYES, CIVIL DEFENSE COORDINATOR, TO SIGN THE WAREHOUSE ISSUE SHEET OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY, AND TERMINATING AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 4898. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-525 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-526: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-526 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ORANGE COUNTY PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, INCa, FOR THE LEASING OF AN IDENTI-KIT BY THE CITY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ""'~';;:'''~"'-~'''''~''''''''''''''''---''''''''''''''*'-'~'..,~+.; 6844 City Hall. Anaheim. California - OOUNCIL MINUTES - June 18, 1963, 3:00 P,M, A YES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNe I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-526 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-527: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-527 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; portion of park site at Ninth and Katella Ave.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC ILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-527 duly passed and INSURANCE - MERCANTILE ROBBERY AND SAFE BURGLARY - CITY HALL: Renewal of Pacific Indemnity Company Insurance (Policy DHS 32292) for the period of June l, 1963 to June 1, 1966, and payment of premium in the amount of $114.76, was authorized on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 - ADDITION OF CHAPTER 18.18 - R-E. RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ZONE: Pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 786, Series 1962-63, the City Council scheduled public hearing to be held July 9, 1963, 7:00 O'Clock P.M., to consider the proposed amendment to Title 18, of the Anaheim Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 18.18, creating "R-E" Residential Estate Zone, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-528: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-528 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME OF SIGS PLACE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO TUDOR PLACE. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCI LMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Kyein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-528 duly passed and CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED: a. City of Orange resolution endorsing the fourth of July "Ringing of Bells". b. Feather River Project Association Agenda for June 6, 1963, meeting. c. Feather River Project Association Legislative Memo #19 listing bills affecting water development. '~"'-;~o;"F,,~-;;;;i:,;_""~;-'<;#;~.!.;;,~~;;~.:ij;;.iC:~-_ 1 ~I---- ~ 68L15 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-529: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-529 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Johanna K. Hegel) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-529 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO. 63R-530: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-530 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert S. Barnes, et al.) On Toll call the foregoing resolution was dUly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-530 duly passed and ORDINANCE NO" 1858: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1858 for final reading" Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-56 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1858 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coon s. adopted. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Ordinance No. 1858 duly passed and ORDINANCE NO. 1859: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1859 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 1~.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking at Any Time, east side of Nutwood Street from Ball Road to Castle Avenue) ~''''"~~~''''J~'''if'H'''',6~,~''',:J._'_";'''''''''- " ('IT "'IiIiIiii'_',:i .. 68L16 City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1859 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Ordinance No. 1859 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 1861: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 186l for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-75 - R-3 & C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. l86l and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte mov~d the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NOQ 1862: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1862 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-46 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. l862 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1863: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1863 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-66 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No.. 1863 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1864: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1864 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMEND1NG TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-78 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1864 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1865: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1865 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (6) - M-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1865 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ,~,o;.;~~i;;'o",C!$.")~''MC,"-,','ii:!:,jjfi''ic~<!::'~it<i,J: 68~7 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1963. 3:00 P.M. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICErSE APPLICATION: Premise to Premise transfer of On-Sale General License - Kramervs Hofbrau, 1160 North Dowling Avenue (Conditional Use Permit No. 188), was submitted for Council information. No action was taken by the City Council. EARL KALTENBACH~ ARCHITFCT - FIRE HEADQUARTERS BUILDING (JOB NO. 4700): Mr. Murdoch reported that a request to release a portion of the final payment of the Kaltenbach contract has been received; that the amount being held by the City is $5,010.00, and the cost of remaining items pending further determination as to responsibility is estimated to not exce~d $700.00. On the r$commendations of the City Manager, release of $~,OOO.OO of the final Earl Kaltenbach payment was authorized, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. EMPLOYMENT - H. ZINDER 4ND ASSOCIATES: Discussion was held concerning proposal submitted by H. Zirtder and Associates for reviewing the report of the Southern California Edison Company dated January 1, 1963, and analyzing the report of H. Zinder and Associates on study made by that firm of alternate sources of power supply for the Cities of Anaheim, Colton and Riverside, charge for said services not to exceed $4,000.00, which cost would be shared by the City of Anaheim and the City of Riverside. On the recommendations of the City Manager and on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, employment of H. Zinder and Associates was authorized in accordance with their proposal, in order to properly advise the Public Utility Commission Staff of matters pertinent to the Southern California Edison Company application, which was denied without prejudice in the previous hearing. MOTION CARRIED. NOTICE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION: Notice of public hearing to be held June 24, 1963, 10:OO A.M. - Commission Courtroom, State OfficeBuilding, 107 South Broadway, Los Angeles, California, on application filed by Southern California Water Company for an order granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to render water services in certain unincorporated territory in the County of Orange, was submitted. No action was taken by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-53l: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-531 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN GREAT WESTERN LAND CO. AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM WITH REFERENCE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER LINE IN TRACT NO. 4427. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: CO UN: I LMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None. Coons. adopted. The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-531 duly passed and TRANSFER OF FUNDS: At the request of John Woodstra, Accounting Officer, transfer of funds from Traffic Safety, In Lieu, Parking Metey, Recreation, Special Gas Tax Improvement and Parksites, Playgrounds and Recreation Funds, to the G~neral Fund for reimbursement of amounts advanced by the General Fund during the fiscal year, the exact amounts to be determined prior to the closing of the books for this fiscal year, was authorized on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: motion. SIGNED: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. no~ CARRIED. (9:50 P.M.) ~~. ~~,.?.-<--' City Clerk Councilman Dutton seconded the -~-"""""~,.<j;"'<""""...~"._-.',._-..-,'"""",........,~.",,,,...~""_..t_'""',, 'f