Loading...
1963/10/01 7122 City HallQ AnaheimQ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1. 1963. 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular ~e~~ion. ABSENT~ PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons (entered the meeting9 4:25 P.M.). COUNCILMEN~ Nonea CITY MANAGER~ Keith Ao Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geislera CITY CLERK~ Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James Pa Maddoxa PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Ao Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidta ~ I PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tern Chandler called the meeting to orderQ MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Schutteg seconded by Councilman Dutton, minutes of the Anaheim City Council mGeting~ held September 10 and 17~ 1963, were approvedo MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 63R~776: On the recommendations of the City Manager9 Councilman D~tton offered Resolution No. 63R-776 for adoption~ calling for bid proposals for Joe Noo 1273. Refer to Resolution Booka A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 9 TO WIT~ THE SANTA ANA CANYON SEWER IMPROVEMENT 9 FROM THE IMPERIAL HIGHWAY TO APPROXIMATELY 79400 FEET EAST OF JEFFERSON STREET~ IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE 9 JOB NOo 1273; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILESs DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS9 SPECIFICATIONS~ ETCo; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIR- ECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF Q (Bids to be opened October 249 1963 ~ 2:00 P.M.) On roll call the foregoing resolLtion was duly passed and adopted by the fol owing vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: D~tton~ SchLtte and Chandler. NOES: COUNCILMEN~ None" ABSENT~ COUNCILMAN~ Coons" ABSTA=NED FROM VOTING: COUNCILMAN~ Kreino Mayor Pro Tern Chandler declared Resolution NOG 63R-776 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NOD J.916: COJnc Iman D~tton offered Ordinance No" 1916 for first readingo AN ORDINANCE OF fHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 189 CHAPTER 18.649 SECTION 18,64,0209 SUBSECTIONS 2 and 39 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USESa Ira ler Parks) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance NaG 1916 and havIng knowledge of the contentstnerein) Co~ncllman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NOD 62~63-1l2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOg 422: Submitted by Robert RG Dowling, et alj requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to construct a two-story multiple family planned residential development with carports~ and waiver of one-story height limitation9 on property located at the northeast corner of Orangethorpe and Dowling Avenues9 extending northerly to Placentia-Yorba Boulevard. Public hearlng was held September 179 1963, at which time the hearing was closed and the City Attorney's office directed to prepare reso- lutlon concerning rec asslf cat on setting forth findings outlining points of isolatIon; anj cond:tlons prereq~_s~teto reclassificat_on of subject property" ,"",,",,~,._,.,,;~,+~";;._.I"''-_'+;-'';'*,_ C,;._..,___".~;_;';;'>..""",.,.~~~~~,,",_~_'-"- 7123 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Mro Gei~ler read findings set forth in resolution prepared by the City AttorneyUs office, as follows: la That the Northeast Industrial Area should be retained as an area limited to industrial uses and industrially related use~ and ~hould not be developed for residential purposes. 28 That the exact boundaries for development of the industrial area have never been established but rather only general areas and boundaries have been indicated for the industrial areae 3. That the subject property is in the general area of the Northeast Industrial Area btit is on the periphery thereof9 and that the subject property is isolated from other properties in the Northeast Industrial Area in the following particulars, to wit: (a) The property is bounded on the north by Placentia-Yorba Boulevard, plus a raised railroad tracK bed north of ~aid Placentia-Yorba Boulevard which separates the property from any industrially utilized property in the City of Placentiaa (b) The property is separated on the west by Dowling Avenue, a secondary highway, and the property on the west side of said Dowling Avenue~ though considered generally in the industrial area, is all zoned and projected for commercial recreational developmenta (c) The subject property is separated at the south by Orangethorpe Avenueg a primary highwaY9 plus a flood control channel running ~outherly of Orangethorpe Avenue and approximately 100 feet to the south of said Orangethorpe Avenue~ (d) The subjec~ property~ plus a small segment of additional property easterly of sUbject propertY9 is bounded on the east by the inter- section of Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia-Yorba Boulevard, just south of the raised railroad tracksa 40 That the peculiar circumstances of this property with its location and topography do not lend themselves to an integrated industrial develop- ment and are physically separated from other properties in the industrial area so as to be impracticable for development as an integrated project with other properties in the Northeast Ind~strial Area. 50 That the utilization of this property for residential purpose~ would not affect the development of the Northeast Industrial Area for industrial purposes and would not constit0te an intrusion of residential develop- ment in the Northeast Industrial Area which is designated for industrial developmento Mr. E. A0 Raulston, President of Heritage Construction Company, developer, submitted revised plans for City Council reviewo It was noted said plans have been checked by the Planning Departmento (Revised plans9 consisting of fifteen pagesj were r8viewed9 dated this date, and signed by Mayor Pro Tern Chandlero ) Council discussion was held9 and at the conclusion thereof, Council- man Dutton moved that plans submitted to the City Council this date replace plans subml~ted September 179 19639 and that September 179 1963 plans, together wiTh ttlree large elevation renderings9 be returned to the applicants~ Councilman Krein seconded the motiona MOTION CARRIEDa The City Attorney read conditions as set forth in the resolution and further read conditions proposed to be included in additional resolution to be prepared, granting Conditional Use Permit No~ 422. RESOLUTION NO~ ~~R-777~ Further di$cu~sion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion theregf, Councilman Dutton Qffered Resolution NOe 63R-777 for adoption, authorizihg pr~paration of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested9 subject to the following conditions: la That a Final Tract Map of subject property shall be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2~ That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. '"-~'~"-..;o;:a;o,..""_t,,,,,,,,',;'~L-_~..; ,.<,";;'.~,."~~~.;A>;:.,'." "-.1 , 7124 City Halla Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES -, October lQ 1963~ 3:00 P.M. 3a That sUbject properTY shall be developed SUbstantially in accordance with plans and specif cations on file with the City of Anaheim~ marked v'Exhibits Nosa 1 thro"'9h l5~0I inclusive, as s'jbmitted and approved by the City Council this date. 4. That the Covenants~ Conditions and Restrictions submitted by the appli- cants shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to or concurrently with the recordation of an approved Final Tract Map of subject property, 5. That tree wells shall be provided at approximately 40-foot interval~ in the Orangethorpe and Dowling Avenues and Placentia-Yorba Boulevard parkways abutting subject property, in both parkways of the collector streets on the east end of subject property~ and in the parkways of all streets to be developed within the interior of said property; that plans for said tree wells and the landscaping therein, shall be submitted to and approved by the S~perintenden~ of Parkway Maintenance~ and that saId tree wells shall be planted prior to final building inspection. Refer to ResoluTion BooKQ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE REtATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGEDi (62-63~112 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN: D~ttonj Noneo Coons~ Schutte, Krein and Chandler4 Mayor Pro Tern Chandler declared Resolution Noo 63R-777 duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NOa 63R-778: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 63R-778 for adoption9 granting Conditional Use Permit Noo 422, subject to the following conditions: 10 That the owner of s~bject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25aOO per dwelling ~nit to be collec~ed at the time the building permi~s dre :ss,ed0 2. That trash storage areas shal be provided in accordance with approved plans on fi e n ~he off ce of the Director of Public Worksj prior to final building Inspection~ 30 That the condi iona ,se permit is granted s'Jbject to the completion of Reclassification NOG 62-63-1120 4. That sUbject property shall be developed s~bstantially in accordance with plans and speed cations on f e with the City of Anaheim 9 marked HExhibits Noso i:hro..:gh 15H, incl_s1ve a:3 submitted and approved by the City Councllthis datea 50 That the Covenantsj Conditions and Restrictions submitted by the appli- cants shall be approved by the Ci Attorney and shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange Co~nty Recorder prior to or concurrently with the recordation of an approved Final fract Map on sUbject property~ 6. That tree wells shal be provided at approximately 40-foot intervals in the Orangethorpe and Dowling Avenues and Placentia-Yorba Boulevard parkways abutting ect propertY3 in both parkways of the collector streets on the east end of subject property~ and in the parkways of all streets to De developed within the interior of said property; that plans for said tree wells and the andscaping therein9 shall be submitted to and approved by the SJperincendent of Parkway Malntenance9 and that sa d tree wells 50a_ be planted pr or ~o ~nal b~ Idlng inspection a Refer to Re LLcn BOOK, A RESOLUTION OF THE C lTY COUNC"- OF THE Ci ry OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 422. "'--,_",'_"._"'.__ci-;".-~,~.... 7125 City Halla Anaheimu California ...~ COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1. 19630 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 63R-778 was duly pas~ed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler. Noneo Coon So adopted .) The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution NOa 63R-778 duly passed and RESOLUTION NOo 63R~7791. CO,Jncilman Krein offered Re~olution No~ 63R-779 for adop,tiono Refer to Resol~tion Booka A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS FOR THE FUR- NISHING OF ALL MATERIALS9 PLANT LABOR AND SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF THE KATELLA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ PROJECT NOa l02-Aa On roll call. tne foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vo~e; AYES: NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN ~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Schu~te~ Krein and Chandler. Noneo Coon So adoptedo The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resollition Noo 63R-779 duly passed and RESOLUTION NOo 63R-7801 Co~ncilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-780 for adoptiono Refer to ResolJtion Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 9 TO WIT~ THE KATELLA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT~ FROM APPROXIMATELY 1419 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 2880 FEET WEST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD9 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM y PROJECT NO ,. 102'" A; APPROVING THE DES IGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC., AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRLCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened OctobeI 319 1963, 2:00 P.Mw) On roll cal the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES. ABSENT. COUNCiLMEN~ COUNCILMEN: C OUNC 1 iMAN : Dutton, Schuttei Krein and Chandler. N'.Jne. r' ,-,oon 3, Tne Mayor Il~fT, ejec ayed Reso ut on Noo 63R-780 dul y passed and adoptedQ RESOLUTION NO. 63R"18l: Co,~,nc rnan SChL"t-t8 offered Resolution No~ 63R~781 for adoption, Refer co Re .L on Book A RESOLUTION OF THE C-,lV COUNCIL OF [HE ClfY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTIN(~ THE EXECUJiON OF A MED~CAL SELF-HELP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE UN rED Sl ArE:; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 9 EDUCATION, AND WELFARE (J i ape ~ ':1rLJ ~L. ~.~ / .-';0, """",,,,.~..,,,, ",".".,., ',<", ...... .........,''"'''~.~ I .... 17 7126 City Hall.. AnaheiffiQ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES ,- October L. 19634 3:00 PoMo On roll call the foregoing Resolution Noo 63R,-781 was duly pas~ed and adopted by the following vote; AYES:; NOES~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN; CDUNC I LMEN: C OUNC I LMAN ~ Duttong Schutte9 Krein and ChandlerG None Coons adoptedo The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No~ 63R~781 duly passed and - WORK ORDER NOo 4501- CENTRAL LIBRARY'. Request of Carroll Sagar and Associates, suppliers of furniture for the Central Library~ for release of fifteen per cent retention~ as set forth in the contract~ due to delay in completion of the Library building, was deferred to this date~ pending contact by the City of Anaheim with Mro Joe !ordan. Architect for the library building, for further investigation and recommendations. Mr.. Geisler reported that after contacting Mr. Jordan, he was of the opinion that additional clarific3tion of this matter waG necessary. He noted that the contract calls for installation of furnishings, however several pieces of furniture dre not in place on the second floor. Mr. Geisler further advised that the furniture is the responsibility of Carroll Sagar cmd Associ8tes until it is installed, and acceptance of comp-letion of the contract should be upon completion of installation; and thereupon he r~comm~nded no action beL-:iken by the City Council on the above request until further investigation is madeo Subject request WaS deferred to the meeting of October 8~ 1963, 3~OO O~Clock PoMo CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGq RECLASSIFICA'r:ON NO" 63,-64'~18AND VARIANCE NO" 1591: Submitted by A0 Mn Rodriquezg requesting change of zone from R-A and R-3 to R-3) bnd permission to waive one story height limitation and garage requIrement to permIt construction of c~rports; property located on the eas+~s_lde of West Street approxim3tely 541 feet north of La Palma Avenue. ['he 2i t,y P lannin;j Cornmj.:j~on pur~3u:mt to Resolution No~ 8779 3erle; 1963 649 recommendeo3id reel :;:if :1tion;ubject to conditions~ and pursujnt ~o Resolution Noo 878q Ser 23 1963-64, granted Vari6nce Noo 1591, subject to onaitions0 Publ hearing W3~ held by the C Council on September 24, 1963, ~Dd -ontinued to thi aate to 3110w the applicant an opportunity to resolve a problem relat ve to a 10 foot easement to provide access to the rear portion of subject property Council Mayor Pro Te~ Chandler 3ked f anyone wished to address the City Mr0 Kenneth L3€] Attorney representing owners of property directly north at subject property, ldvised th~ttheir previous objection to the access drivewaY9 along the northerly property line of subject property, has been w~thdr~wn; as reciproc31 10 foot ~nd 15 foot easements are to be given for 2 mutu~l drivewayo Mr" Stanley Rosen, Attorney and proposed purchaser of the property, advised that the agreement extends joint use of the driveway to the residents of two homes adjacent to subject property on the Northo He noted the 10 foot easement would be combined with dddlt.onal 15 foot driveway, totaling 25 foot access to rear potion of the property. The Mayor pro tern asked f anyone else wished to address the Council~ there being no response, declared the hearing closedo RESOLU'TION NOo 63R-782: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NOQ 63R-782 for adoption, concurring with recommendJL,ons of the 1~i ty Planning Commission, authorizing preparation of neCeSG3ry Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommend=Jtlon~) of the ..-=: ty Planning Commis:siono ;;....;;,..'"-".....-..:.i:.,.::<~~_..4.~..;._...r.~.... '.....-"'<,;<i>~ 7l~7 City Hall, P.naheim~ California .~ COUNCIL MINUTES ,~. October 1.. 1963.. 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolut on BOOka A RESOLUTION OF THE C~TY COUNC,LL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (6364-18 - R3) On roll cal the foregoing Resolution NOG 63R-782 was duly passed and adopted by ~he following vote: AYES; NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler. None, Coon 5 0 The Mavor Pro Tem declared Resolution Noo 63R-782 duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO. 63R.c'783.l. Co...mc Iman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 63R-783 for adoptiong granting Variance Noo 1591, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ Refer ~o Resol~tion Hooke A RESOLUTION OF THE Ci:TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NOo 159 L, On IO cal the toregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following VOTe: AYES ~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN ~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCrLMAN~ Duttoni Schutte, Krein and Chandlera None" Coonso / adopted~ The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution Noo 63R-783 duly passed and PUBLIC HEARING ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on propo~ed abandonment of Ridgeway AvenJe9 from Lincoln Avenue to 1338059 feet south of Lincoln Avenue portion of Tract Noo 5090), pursuan~ to Resolution Noo 63R-734~ duly published in t~e Anaheim BLlletin September 199 1963~ and notices thereof posted in accordance with law~ Mro James Maddox, City Engineer, reported said proposed abandonment has cleared a C:lt, j'~~paTtmen'L3 and oTtside agencies~ that the Edison Com-' par' c",,,; 1~ c .~,.., ;j') ,J ',c.'- t::,~ e :; pI'ovided rights are preserved for e (;3 ,>NO L 0, aL~c.,;', G desired9 that provisions be rnci;j,':' 1~1 .;..(:'~r!l, ..y;;:fT;l"l e Cil 10rnla Edison Company for ",_ e , M~ Pro errl ~r aSKed i anyone wished to address the Coun c ii" 1:: :: J r i: c:ppo S ~ 0 TJH0 pLOpO sed abandonment 9 there be 11';] : e.5pCi; ,t.~ deCl:tlfJd tt e tiear....ng closed. RESOLUTIOti_NO.;:......tJR- .'~ for adopt ong S ojec Cc ,nc ,,rn3n S.:::.rl,itLe olfered Resolution No. 63R-784 the recommendations of the City Engineer. Ref t.'I ~o RH ion 800k, A RESOLUTiON ,JF fHE CllY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACA- TION AND ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT S FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER ACROSS, ALONG AND fHROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. lR dgeway S~ree~, POl~~on afTract 5090) On \J i C a by the f01 ow_ng va e~ UH:? to rego resol. on was duly passed and adopted Ref er LO pa.je 7 L28) -+~~'7'=""'~_,.,;;."" ',;",,-,"'-"""'"_''' -=.,"'.,=.......',;..,.'_~ 7128 City Hall, AnaheimL California .~ COUNCIL MINUTES- October 1, 1963, 3:00 P.M. AYES~ NOES~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNC:LMEN~ COUNC ILMAN ~ Dutton~ Schutte" Krein and Chandler. None. ::;oonSfJ The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R-784 duly passed and adopted. WEBSTER STREET IMPROVEMENT 0 Petition from. property owners on Webster Street protesting the proposed lowering of said street for drainage purposes was considered at the City Council meeting held September 10, 1963, and the matter deferred to this date to llow Council inspection of the area. Mr~ Murdoch reported that representatives of the City of Anaheim met with representatives of the two mutual water companies maintaining lines in the areag at which time a proposal was made by the City for acquisition of the mutual water companies in such a manner so as to require no initial outlay from the property ownersa He further reported that representatives of the water districts are currently circulating information to their ownership, and re- quest postponement of City Council determination until such tim~ as those persons holding interest in the mutual water companies can make their desires known.. M::r.. Clifford Swallow" 644 Web~ter Street:J addre~~ed the City Council advising th3t circulation of petitions in the area started today, and requested th2t the matter be deferred for two weeks to allow completion of :33id peti tionso On motion by Councilman ~~ein seconded by Councilman Dutton, determination on the matter of lowering qnd improving Webster Street was deferred to October 15,. 19639 3~OO P..M, MOT20N,::;ARRiED. RECLASS:FICATiON NO" 63'-64'-lOuAND::;OND"cL"OI~AL JSE PERM:= IS NOS. 456 AND 457: Public hearing on RecIa's f_cition ~oo 63-64-10, 3nd Conditional Use Permib; No<;. 456 :.md 45~~ W,', held on (September 17" 1963, at which time the hear~ng was closed nd ticn the C :ouncll continued to this date for further;tudy of the 1re MI. Murdoch::.dl L ed th:j t Mr, D, He Ln :J Attorney representing MrQ Bostwick) owner of MidwJ IT ler P~rk, hld been present earlier in the meet ng butw; un:;.b e to remi ; however... Mr"He lY3ubmitted copies of Iretter to Mro SCttw_ K flom :3'~ite DI 6~on of Housing relating \13r:;OU:j perrL;tj wh h:, been ,ued fOl tr ler te..; on subject propert eEj" D~ CWj 10n W,j; held by the ~ty Counc_l, 3nd dt the conclusion E. 3t 63 64-10 Conditional Use deferred pend jlI of Councilman Coons. thereof1 ac~ion on Reclj PermIts Nos. 456 ~nd 45- N (Reier I~O P:,ge 71J3 REQUEST .FOR RE~HEAR1NG - REC:....AS:,)~F_:;ArON NO.. 62-63-127, Reque:"jt of Mrs. Eva S. Biel:Hl:-;ki, d;;jtedSeptember J 1963" for recor1,ider:ltion of Rec d'5 fi.c:1t:ion No~ 62,63 .l2 'J W.i '1ubmi tted" Di Jo ,on Wj; n2~d by tne :ounc 1 1nd t WJ~ noted that sub.Je t recl_:>:,:.f at..oo appl"ed for R-J Zon fig on the ";outh side of Cre';cent Avenue,-:pproximat2 3 feet:2 of D'lle Avenue. Mr. ohn Mi 11er J 583 We,t 19th Stree t,~ ':OSt:i M@:';3, Ca.l i fornia, representing the 3ppi 1nt~ advi eathat plans have been revised~ and they now reflect gdrden~type mul t,~ple fdmLly le,ident 1 development which they feel will be the best use of the property" Counc Im::in5c hu t::2 rno'v€O th t ) xmon to 'j perlod for the ref i 1 ing of applicdtion 62-63-127 be wd~ved~ :oun~ Imdn Krein 3econded the motion. MorTON CARR ED, M,:3YOI Pro ~em ,~hnaler Miller that the ippl .mt )hould a new 3ppl tlon. fled the ~bove tion~ informing Mr. ontl tthe Pl~nning Department and file ~)''''''-'''f--'''''"'-''-''''"''"'''''~''''',"_..._._..","~,-",,_..-'',.~-- - w~.._....=;,.-,",".~'.."".__.; 7129 Ci tv Hall Q Anahe:ll1l~ifornia -" COUNCIL MINUTES October 1& 1963. 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO" 60-"t182 REVISED PLANS. Revised plans submitted by Billy J. Kiker in connect_on with Reclassification NOG 60-61-82~ were reviewed by the City Co~ncil ~ogetner wl~h recommendations of the City Planning Department) Mr. Ken .JW ~6r_ne~ 01 Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney for the applicant, advised chat although ~he access drives on the east and we~t boundaries are shown as having a twelve fOOt width instead of the recommended twenty-one feetj a twent; !00t 6_ will ex~end along the rear of the property, and upon complet n[hereof said twelve-foot access drives will be closed to Bal Road and ~emp01'a:c) cir:l\/(:;>:nc, ded in .the side yard areaso On motion by CO'LnC Iman Schutte:> seconded by Councilman Duttong revised plans marKed Exhlb:~s 1 to 6~ Revision Noo 1, as submitted~ were approvedo MOTION CARRIED. [Revised Plans dated this date and signed by Mayor Pro fern Chandler.; SIGN REQUEST ~. PARK VILLAGE HOMES: AppLication submi tted by Park Village Home~, 2763 West Linccln~ requesting permission to erect a billboard type sign on property loca~ed on the north side of Lincoln Avenue~ 660 feet east of Dale Street9 advert:s:ngLhlr~y-one apartment units northerly from subject propertY9 together with plans and report from the Building Department~ wa~ reviewed by ~he City Co~nci 0 On motion Dy C00ncilman Krein9 seconded by Councilman Schutte, said LeGe was gr3.n~edo MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK VoLAIVER 750 WES] BALL ROADJ.. Reql.iiest of Global Van Lines for waiver of sidewalks at 750 Was Eal Road~ was s~bmittedo On tne recommenda~ions of the City Engineer9 Councilman Schutte moved said sidewalk wa~veT be granted9 subject to no permanent planting (trees) in the drea re3erved for fut~re sidewalkso Councilman Krein seconded the mOTiono MOTION CARRIEDa RESOLUTION N~ 63R~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NOa 63R-785 for adoptiono Refer to Resol~~lon Booka A RESOLUI~ON CJF ;HE C,_ iY COUNCiL Of ,'HE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DEfERM{NiN<; HE PF~EVj\u~.N,.:; RA E JFINAC;E:3iO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDi:::.;J f.JR PU8L~C WORKS CONTRACTS OF THE CITY OF ANAHELM FOR ~HE FURN~.~)JLN,-) OF ALL MAiER1ALS~ PLANT, LABOR AND SERVICES FOR nIE CONSTRUe 1 .ON, .i-NS ,-A, LA: LON AND COMPLETION OF FIXED TIME TRAFFIC SIGNAL :3Y'3TE!\iL3. Jr ~ C31. ":" t creJo Ji] 'eso ion was duly passed and adopted D I . t, e 1 ". 'N t2 ~ AY f::'~~ : COuNC cl.MEN. D., :_011 Scn te9 Krein and Chandler~ COUNCL~ME~: None COUNC.LMAN: N(JE-.) ~ AE;Er\ and M:! . on NOa 63R-785 duly passed D, .- ~ ~. ..l. \J eiT,J<:1\"': d ~ej Re:::>o,i RESOLUTION NO. GJR '8b~ Co_r: In,3n ~Ch ie offered Resolution No. 63R-786 for adoptlon, Reier bOOK. A RESOLUT LDN OF ,HE CJY C>JUNC L. OF iriE CT ry Of ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINTNC; TriA" PU1H ,C CONvENIENCE AND )\JECESSTTY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLErrON OF A _MPROVEMENJ r~) WI r: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING fRAFF IC S ~.~,N1\L) AND SAF E Y 1 "JH ~ NC; A IHE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND LA PA."Mi\ AVl.-NUf, ....N iHE ,,'( OF ANAHEiM JOB NO. 792; APPROVING THE DESiGN~':; ~ PROf DRAW d~0S AND :::>PEC1F LCATTONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHOR iN C'ON'3TRUC ~()N ;)ff\LU PUBLiC MPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAiD PLAN'~~ ,F<CA] <IN_~., EIC., AND AUFHORlLiNG AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERJ< PUB] ,,",I-: J\ N01 1. LN._, 3EA~ ED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION HiEREOf. cr, J_ ce J::J ,,9t3,~:OO P~M..) . .- ~"'"'''''-'''' T--V "t 7130 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California' COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1. 1963~ 3:00 P.M. On roI call the foregoing Resolution No~ 63R-786 was duly passed and adopted by the followlng vOte! AYES~ NOES; ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN~ D_~ton, SChutte~ Krein and Chandlera None, Coons" adopted" The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R-786 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO. 63R~78'7: Co~nc Iman Krein offered Resolution Noo 63R-787 for adoption a Refer to Reso]~ ion Booka A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMI- NING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT~ FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND NORTH STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO~ 798; APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS9 PROFILES9 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS, EICa; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON,- STRUCTION THEREOF. Bids c be opened October 24, 1963~ 2:00 P.M.) On rol call the orego by the fo ~owing vote: re io~ was dLly passed and adopted AYES: NOES: ABSENT~ COUNC I LMEN : COUNC I LMEN : COUNCILM.AN~ Dut~on9 SChu~te9 Krein and Chandler" None. Coons adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 63R>o787 duly passed and RESOLUTION NO. 63R~788t COunc 1man Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-788 for adoptiono Refer to ResolL~ion BOOK a A RESOLUTION OF fHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN=ENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND SYCAMORE STREET~ JOB NOQ 799; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, .SPECIFICATIONS~ EICa; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INViTING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF" (Bids to be opened October 249 J963. 2:00 PoMJ Or: ~ 1 ',j {'e ~o NOd.S d passed and adopted ~he fo CiWJnj AYES: COUNCi MEN; NOES ~ CCUNC UVlEN: ABSENT: COUNC' MP,N ~ v; .( Ll-: KreLn and Chandler ~ It'.e Ma'vol p, Je c a:' f~.J R e ,:.') 0 Lon No 0 788 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R -789 ~ Co~nc, .\n,an adoption" "un o! 1 ';~red Resolution No. 63R-789 for Refer to Re0U B C<J K, 'O"~::"..:~'_L':+-'~"';:';:";;'H'.;';...:'"._~:,;;,'=~-~,.:;;..;';.;;;"""'T''''~.-~-'''- 7131 City Halla Anaheim, California COUNCIL MiNUTES ,~o October lQ 1963.. 3:00 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT~ THE RED GUM STREET-LA PALMA AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT PARTLY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIMg AND PARTLY IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE 3 JOB NO., 1274; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS~ PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ETC~; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF, (Bids to be opened OCtOber 24j 963~ 2:00 P~M~) On LO 1 call the foregoing Resolution NOQ 63R-789 was duly passed and adopTed by the t lowing vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN: Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandle~ Noneo Coon 5, adoptedo The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution Noo 63R-789 dUly passed and RE-APPLICATION~ PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION: Mr. Geisler advised that petition by the City of Anaheim before the P:;blic Utilities Commission for the Lewis Street crossing of tree Santa Fe Railroad, was denied, and requested permis- sion to ,~{ 1.':: :<-J:: .,3 0elO,':'(c.: e P,b::c Utilities Commission. On IT;n~' nn Dy Co,..;.nc ~ ~. c man D tLon, seconded by Councilman Krein, s CommissiOE was authorizedG MOTION reapp",~~: :ARR=EJ CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXE~l On mo ion by CouncIlman Schutte, seconded by Co~ncilman Dlittong tne Orange Co~nty Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on Lhe fo 10W1C.:) property acquired by the City of Anaheim for mLnlcipaL p~Tposes: Property acquired pursuant to Resolution No" 63R"73c)~ formerJ assessed to D')lke Water Company, deed recorded September 16~ ~9t39 as DOC0ment Noo 11880, in Book 6717 at page~ 667-675, both inc llsive~ Offic a Records of Orange CountYi California; and Property acqj~., red pUT..3",3fl t to Reso.titlon No" 63R~ 737, al so formerly assessed to Dyke Wa~eI Company~ deed recorded September 16, 19639 as Documen~ No" 87]9.0 BOOK to ,at pages 631-656, both inclusive, Offic al Records of Orange COGn~Yj Californiao MOTION CARRIED. . . ,~) :-, l; c RESOLUTION NO. 63R:.J90; Cc.,[lC lman Dvtton offered Resolution No" 63R-790 for adoption. Refer to ResG.t ton BOJKo A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY. (Christine O"Donnell) On roll ca che foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the fol owing vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNcrLMEN~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMAN ~ DutTon~ SChuttei Krein and Chandlera None, Coon s. adoptedo The Mayor Pro fern dec ared Resolution No. 63R-790 duly pas~ed and PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENI: Ass S'Lan'C Ci ty Manaqer Robert Davis reported on informal bids recei ved for the p.<rcnase of rr.;~ J ~'.g pic ~'J:re and sound equlpmen't for the Police Dept > iol~uws) and recummended acceptance of the low bid9 of Lloyd's Camera Exchangej Holj.ywood~ in The amount of $39820.96, including tax; LloYdi Camera Exchange, Ho~lywood B rns and Sawyer~ Hollywood Royce Photo SupplY3 Anaheim S.OoSo Photo Cima Supply Co., Hollywood $ 39820,,96 4;j097..60 4,552<175 No Quote 7132 City Halla AnaheimQ Californla- COUNCIL MINUTES- October 1<) 1963.. 3:00 P.M. On ~he recommendations of ~he Assistant City Manager and the Police Department9 Councilman Dutton moved that the low bid of LloydVs Camera Exchange be accepted and p~rchase in the amOJnt of $39820.96 authorized~ Councilman Krein seconded the motiorlo MOTION CARRIEDo (Councilman Coons entered the meeting, 4:25 PaM~) Mayor Pro rem Chandler t~rned the Chairmanship of the meeting over to Mayor Coonso "- PURCHASE Of EQUIPMENT~ Mro Davis repoTced on informal bids received for the pur- chase of one Backhoe and Loader tractor~ as follows~ and recommended acceptance of the third low bid9 that of Orange County Tractor, Anaheim, in the amount of $7,472040, including taxa He advIsed that the first and second low bids were for Ford and Allis Chalmers equipment, respectivelY9 and the Ca~e tractor is the only one which can meet specifica'Cions of tne Water Division. McCoy Motor Tractor Division Schneider Tractor, TustIn Orange County TractoTi Anahe~m HarroD, Rickard & McCone, Norwalk Wallace Tractor Anaheim (Ford) (Allis Chalmers) (Case) (Case) $ 7~165.6Q 79225097" 7,472.40 8,216000 No Quote On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that ~he bid of Orange County Tractor in ~he amount of $79472040 be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid, as the two lower oids did no~ meet Ci~i specifications> Councilman Krein seconded the motior1o MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED RE-DISTRICTING~ METERED CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCOUNTS~ Mro Davi~ reported on two informal proposals received for redistricting metered Customer Service Accounts~ advisIng that Public U~ ities Services, Incaj bid $436a58 for each 1,000 accounts redistricted, or a total at an estimated 38~000 accounts9 of approximately $16,500000, plus an additional approximately 7,200 accounts from the Dyke Water System. He fcrtner reported that the other proposal was received from Zinder and Associates, at $9,700 for the basic work, plu~ hourly COStS for compu~er analys s and programming on the computer at $15~00 and $10.00 per hOJro Mra Murdocn advised that the proposed service would be to re-district all of'::he Ci is meter acco,;nts nto an orderly system j whereby the City can efficient operate ~he meter-reading9 and hi ling of the electrical and water accounts) Mro Douglas Ogden, Director of Financej reported that due to the growth of the Ci 9 the method of reading is not orderly; that the system was adequate when setJP9 but is now completel out=dated9 and results in wastedtravel~time between routes. Approximately 240 meters are currently being read each day and L 5 hoped ~hat th 5 wi increase approximately twenty-five per cent w:th same peIsonne ~ f professional re-districting is accompl shedo Councilman Sarli,TIe left the meeting~ 4~50 P.M~) Mra Murdoch further reported that a previous attempt to re-district the accounts was made DY City personnel, tha~ the task took over two years to accomplish, as well as taking personnel from their regular dutiesa (Councilman Schu~te returned ~o the meeting, 5:00 P.M.) Discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler asked for a written report from the Director of Finance, further clarifying the proposed re-d stricting, and giving basis for his recommen- dation. ,,~;'.,,";uo~.ii;';:j 7133 City Halla Anaheim\! California ~. COUNCIL MINUTES ~ October l~ 1963. 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64~lO AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS NOS. 456 AND 457: (See page 7128) RESOLUTION NOo 63R-791: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No~ 63R-791 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of nece~~ary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested~ subject ~o the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No~ 2 thereof to eliminate therefrom 9tZeyn Street?!, QlLemon Street ~rClementine St.reetQ, 9 and Q'Dickel Street". Refer to Resolution Booka A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT T~TLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. 63..64~lO.. R-3; On roll cdl the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote. AYES: NOES~ ABSENT: COUNCiLMEN: COUNCILMEN ~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons. None, None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-791 duly pa~~ed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NOa 63R-792: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-792 for adoption9 granting Condit~conal Use Permit Noo 456, including Lots Nos. 19 2~ 3, and 4 of Block 5, Tract NOa 419, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission9 amending Condition No. 3 thereof by the elimination of the fol owing words:I'Dickel Street and9l. Refer ~o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4560 On Toll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES. NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons~ Noneo Noneo The Mayor declared Resolution NOa 63R~456 duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-793~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noo 63R-793 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No~ 457~ on Lots 6 and 21 of Block 29 Tract Noo 4L9, and denying Conditional Use Permit on Lots 1, Block 2, and Lot 2 Block 3~ of Tract No. 419, as set forth in City Planning Commission Find~n9s, No. 2j Resolu~ion NOm 8749 Series 1963-64, subject to the recommendations the Planning Commission, eliminating therefrom Conditions Nos) and 80 Refer to RE:SO on BooK) A RESOLUTION OF lliE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 457a On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Dutton, Chandler9Krein and Coonso Nonem None. COUNCILMAN: Schutteo T0e M~,or declarea ResoluT on Noo 63R-793 duly passed and adoptedo ~~""-""-""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,-~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,",,,,'"''><;JfIIiIO"'''''..,.",.,.~_ I 'I 7134 City Hall~ Anaheim" Ca,lifornia" COUNCIL MINUTES- October lc. 19630 3:00 P.M. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:15 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. 5~22 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called t:h~ me~ting to order. PRESENT~ ABSENT: PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Dut"ton~ Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN. None. CITY MANAGER~ Keith A~ Murdoch> CITY ATTORNEY~ Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK; Dene M. Willia,mso DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER~ lame$ Po Maddoxo PLANNING DIRECTOR~ Richard A. Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR~ Martin KreidtJ ~ INVOCATION~ Pastor Stief~ of the Grace Lutheran Ch.urch~ gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE~ Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag) PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64~26~ Submitted by Henry Klausing and Josephine Hunt) requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3~ property having frontages on the south side of La lolla Street and the north side of Anaheim Roady and located approximately 2002 feet west of Dowling Street. The City Planning Commission recommended said reclassification be denied, TENTATIVE MAP" TRACT NO& 5307: Pacif c ConsLruction Company~ developers; tract located as stated above9 and contains 97 proposed R-3 lots. Communication from Philip Krakoverj received this date9 advising that the agent for the app~icant was ~nable to attend public hearing9 and requesting at least two weeks continJance on Reclassification No. 63-64-26 and Tentative MaP9 Tract No> 5307) was s~bmitted and reado The Mayor asked :~ anyone ln tne audience was in attendance for this issueo There was no :esponseJ Councilman SchutTe moved that public hearing on Reclassification No. 63~64~26 and Council action on Tentative Map9 Tract No. 5307~ be continued to November 59 1963~ 7:00 OiClock P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motlono MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGQ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63~64~13 AND VARIANCE NO. 1595: Submitted by Eugenie Currie requesting a change of zone from R-A and R-3 to C-l~ and waiver of required parking; on property briefly described as located on the west side of Euclid Street) approximately 250 feet south of Catherine Drive (835 and 839 Nortr: Euclid Street) J The Ci Pann n.j Comm_;lssion pJr3t.antto Resolution No. 8919 SerIes A963-b4 l'.~commei-jeJ saId Le:- d .~~ caLion begranted9 subject to the i 0 OWl ng cond .J . 1, I h.d <<:J:id owne~:'s Sh:3 -' dE:ed:.o the Cl ty of Anaheim a strip of and 53 tee centerline of the street along EUClid Teet fOI3Lreet widen !HJ p_l'poses" 2. Tha~ street improvement p ans 5ha~ be prepared and a 1 engineering reql::rements tJ1e C f AnarJ.G"m a ong be -id Street~ such as curbs and gutters jdewa~K5 ~reet JIdd ng ana pavinY9 drainage facilities~ r other app~rtenan~ work s~a be compieted as required by the City Eng neer and naccordanCE:: W ::,'Cd:dardans and spec fications on f 1 f!. ,the ()fi."J;.c e C,'i Erl\J~.r1(:;eT arId t.:n,at a bor1d in ar) amo.unt and form sat:sfac_o the C. Anaheim ;hall be posted with the It,. "to .aranteE' to ,Jl.;;,caL...o,..on (.1 sa.,d neerLng requlrementso 3, Tha~ the own8~S jb'ec~ pyuP~ ~ ;ha pa the Ci of Anaheim The sum at $2,00 per t on~ f d E0C 10 Stree~ for street lighting purpose:i '"'~"'~o",'-'-'-"'<;~~~"---.-~-- ...."7"" ":"~'"-':'.~W~''ii'!';\.,.",,:,--~. I; .1 ~"""':_"'Y""_:,:",:,,,':,;,'..'C ~';'-'"'__';C"""""___'-__.'"''''''~ 7135 Cit 4~ 5,) 60 7. 8. 9. Anaheim Calofornia - COUNCIL MINUTES .~ October 1 1963 3:00 P.M. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings shall be subject to ~he granting of Variance No. 1595. That the owners af sLbject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a three (3) foot overhang easement along the northerly boundary of subject property. That Condition Nos. l~ 2~ 3~ and 5, above mentioned, shall he complied with with n a perlod of 180 days from date hereof9 or such further time as the Ci Council may grant. That the property owner shall deed access rights to the City of Anaheim, from subject property TO Catalpa Avenue. That sJbject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No~ 2i Exhibit Nosa 1 and 2. That treewells shall be provided at approximately forty (40) foot intervals in the Euclid Street parkway abutting ~ubject property, that plans for said treewells and planting of trees therein~ shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and that said treewells shall be planted with trees prior to final building nspectiono 100 That a six (6) foct masonry wall shall be constructed along the north~ westj and sou~h property lines surrounding the westerly parking area as shown on Revision NO.2, Exhibit Noo l~ 11. That the six~y (60) foot building setback establi~hed on Euclid Street shall be maintained as indicated on Revision No. 29 Exhibit No.1. The Ci~y P~anning Commission pursuant to Resolution NOt 8929 Series 1963-64, gran-ted aald Variance No. 15959 subject to the following conditions: 10 That trasn storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works prior to final bcilding inspection. 2. That Variance Noo 1595 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassi- fication NOJ 63-64~13. 3e That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specIfications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No. 29 Exnibi~ Nos. 1 and 29 except that the plans, relative to the proposed loadIng dock shall be subject to the approval of Development Review prior to th.e issuance of a building permi t. 4. That ail a~r condcionlng facilities shall be contained within the b iIding or properly sh~elded from viewQ 50 Tnat a six \6) foo~ masonry wall shall be constructed along the north~ west, and ;O~th proper~y lines surrounding the westerly parking area as shown on Revis on NOJ 29 Exhibit No.1. 6 That ~reewel s shal be provided at approximately forty (40) foot interva s n the Ere -<.d Street parkway' abiJtting subj ect property, that plans for sa d treewel s and planting of trees therein9 shall be sub- mitted LO and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance~ and said treewe s sha be anted with trees prior to final building l.llspect on, Ni..I I'<IC.: dl ,u_(~:cJ oed L.n ut"tH~: propertY9 the zoning in the dred ~ and (;1 E:: S'jIHLd 2. J e p.b C fedrLng held before the City P arming COTTirTio un J Hecexv. ::.:;eJ a L wa veT at the parking requirements Variance No 1j9~ wa ~d t~at parking requirements for the proposed3e i 6. t of -:1 . _Tn t rE.-: Lure was :_00 restrictive; and further advised tr..aT. lnce Lh :.J ac:;"on lJe C t'v Plann~ng Commi~~ion has directed a studVLO tie made 01 e In.. nm.m- parK tlj requ rements lJ COi.fie dT,an Ch:Hd er Cd eo cL tent ion to the hal f cul-de~ sac:r extending on 3~0Jec: proper y. Mr. Kre dt advised that the half cul~de-sac shown on tne map h s te0n ded:ca ed, and the nor~h half of the street has been n5~a ej; OL ~C ~ -Jt rom ec~ property to Catalpa Avenue will be proh cl:ed. ll~ e M 6 d"K t:.j e aPPl an or ~ s agent wished to address the Co,_.me 7136 City HalL~ AnaheimQ California .~ COUNCIL MINUTES ~. October 10 196303:00 P.M, MrG John Von der Heidej 924 North Euclid Street, appearing for and on behalf of the owner of the property~ advised that they concurred with the findings of the City Planning Commission. Correspondence from Mrs. Sydella Tiberi~ favoring R~3 2oning~ was submitted and reada Mra Von der Heide advised that Mrs~ Tiberi was the owner of the property to the North. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion9 there being no response~ declared the hearing closed~ Plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held con- cerning the recommended setback requirement. At the conclusion thereof9 it was determined that setbacks of the existing commercial developments in the area have been a matter of choice~ and Councilman Chandler objected to an established sixty foot setback~ and further advised that he could not con- scienciously aSSJre fu~~re developers in the area that the sixty foot setback would be maintaineda Councilman Chandler aSKed the petitioner if they would like a continuance in order to contact his principle concerning the setback pro- visions and for possible revision of plans. Mro Bot Payne; of McMahan Furniture CompanYi advised that one of the reasons they preferred not to setback sixty feet was because the setback would result in the creatIon of two exits onto Euclid Street. RESOLUTION NO.. 63R~'794: At "t1:,e conclusion oftne d15cussion9 Councilman Schutte offered Resolution NOJ 63R-794 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested9 subject to the recommendatJ.ons oftne C1 P anning Comm~~ssion9 amending Condition No. 11 thereof to read~ HThat not essthan a fifteen (15) setback from the Euclid Street property Lie shal be ma:n'Ca ined 0 'I Refer to Resolu~ion Booke A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TiTLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. ( 63- 6 4"-13 ~ C ~ 1 ) On ral ca~ the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: COUNC'-LMEN~ D~tton Chandler Schutte9 Krein and Coon~o None, Ncneo The Mayor declared Resa ~on No, 63R-794 dul passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO.. 63R-795; Councilman SCh'l:Lt8 offered Resolution Noo 63R-795 for adoption} granting Var~cance Noo .105959 5iJDJecT to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and tLrther SGbject to the following: 7) One parking space for each 500 square feeL of floor area of the building shall be establ shed on the propertyo 8. That the approval of sUbject variance constitutes a waiver of requ red parking for the proposed furniture store operation, and that Inthe event the occupancy of the proposed building change 9 without providing parking in accordance with Code requirements; Lhis variance shall be subject to review for approval by ,:he Plann Commission of the proposed use prior to issuance of a b'.:siness cense, ~;~",~~.:;;;;;'''_f,,,___;,.:< """'4-_"i"*"1:,j_'-,'i~".~_:':;~~:~~,,,,j _ I ,.....'"...=._..-._.--".......-,~.~,--.~ 7137 City Hall" Anaheimc California - COUNCIL MINUTES~' October l~ 1963~ 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resol~tlon BOOka A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NOG! 159SQ On roil call the foregoing Resolution NOa 63R-795 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES ~ NOES. ABSENT:: COUNC LMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton9 Chandler~ Schutte9 Krein and Coons. None~ Noneo The Mayor declared Resolution NOt 63R-795 duly passed and adopted~ PUBLIC HEARING", RECLASStFICATION NO. 630'64-17; Submitted by Demler Farms~ Inc.~ requesting change of zone from M-l io R-3; property briefly described as having frontages on the east side of Acacia Street9 south ~ide of Via Burton, west side of Baxter Street !,1400 North Acacia Street) ~ [he City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No~ 893~ Series 1963-64 recommended said reclassification be denied. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and zoning and development in the areao He reported that the application was first con- sidered by the Ci t'y Pl anning Commi S5100 Jul y 22~ 1963 ~ and continued to Augu~t 19j 1963, to be considered in conjunction with the Re-Analysis of the Northeast Industrial Area9 and again continued and considered September 49 1963.1 Mr. Kreid~ orief summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission at eacn of their meetings on subject application. Letter received rom Acac a PToperties~ Irvin C. Chapman owner of property adjacent TO subject property (in the City of Fullerton~9 requesting the applica~:on be denied, and letter received at open meeting from Wayne L. Crane of Olson Glass CompanY5 withdrawing former objections based on revised plansJ were sCbmitted and read~ n)e Ma'l'or aSKed It tD.e appl cant or his agent wished to address t.h:e Counc i 1. 0 Mro Ed Demler) owner of Demler Farms~ advised that they have been in the po~ltry business at ~his location for fifteen years~ and because of the growth and changes not only in this areas but all Orange County, they ~eel compel ed to movechelr poultry from this areao With this in mind9 for the pa ~ -ree iea~6 3eve~a co~~act5 have been made to endeavor to 3e~ :he prope~ -~ fo_ M rpo i~e 10ns they have received seem ~o be the c os r:OX ffi. Ozang8 Flood Control Channel, no railroad ace 5 and .d row w~d~n ot AcacIa Street and the traffic pattern (l ::jf:H1i::' 32 :0:'3 I rie ._dte:JLLa '.~ they have been advised by many M. de,ie .;per:5 .. JVL.. J"ev'f,.ta "ears before this area would [Je ; ~ M. I ~, O.::CLi ,:>C; ot Lt.e trundreds of acres available :r:~J e;;CK M.. i interest ~ they have been jC;,. bJ ~\J property R~39 which plan e ~~~ V3 JL is to the Westj the industrial J ;J G , to the Northa appears peopJe rr;ee Mr" the a re2 > an.::1 matel 12b~n()O e:r Wd.:.) v' p. "Ud Lna1.. Lhi s would be an improvement to a~1 c problem9 and would remove approxi- Ltie .iIvine areaa WU'_ j 1"j m~;v c. r vTr. ~ .::' ipe bu l.d the Ea s t) 0;'] and separate tIe fe wou.,d d er aj~ ~ed tha~ plan to move all of the M-l f'I,::! ,,!'\l: ::: crIer y." ot i ce s and research operation to bax'ter .~.~ ro.lt3.je, and install proper landscaping .J ope...:J" un rom R"3 b'y a six foot masonry wal19 which S (j e j lT1 e e k:.. (: n s 0 1 R- 3 e a s t e r 1 Y G 'l.HJI~___'<- 7138 City Ha.lla Anaheimo CalifornIa - CQUNCIL MINUTES October Ie 1963Q 3:00 P.M~ Mr. Logan Moorej representing the developer9 addressed the Council noting on a map illustrated by COlors the are~de5ignated M-l and residential. He advised that appeared that mLch of the opposition was based on a general basis, that [10 M-l property would be considered for R-3 develop- ment under any circumstanceso in h G opinion9 the subject parcel was mistakenly included in an M-l zone on the master pIano Mr. Moore advised that adequate facilities exist to accommodate the proposed R=3 development~ and fl1rther noted that the plan was redesigned to route a 1 traf fie f rom the ind: a area and to e1 iminate the further extension of R-3 easierl Mr. Paul Sensj 146 B~rton Street~ addressed the Council favoring the reclassification9 and advised ~ha~ in is opinion9 the only type of industry that could be developed on sUbject property would be small in natureg due to the lack of area for parking He stated that residential would balance the area for the west and the sou~h and further advised that a majority of the neighbors wh ch he had contacted approved the reclassification. The Mayor aSKed f anyone wisned to address the Council in opposi- tIon to the reclassificatlonJ Mro Harry Shipley 14':/ B.~o55om Lane} noted the location of his residence9 and advised tha~ he was of ~he opinion that the exit from the development would be on Blossom Lane; however~ according to the revised plan9the street does no~ exIt cn Blossom Lane, D a ittle north thereofo He stated that the traffic at the pre5en~ ime is minimum; however~ he questioned whether 5 81 atlon WOtLd rema wIth the R'~3 development in the areao Mr. Shipley further adv:sed that ne was not opposed to the R-3 development; but because of the anned ~ngress and egressj practically to his back door has become more persona 0 Mr. George Strachan9 Secre~ary of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce 9 addressed the Counc advi ng fOT approximatel three years the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce has been serious concerned about reclassifica- tion requests in M'~ area:)" espec a WneI'E~ land use J"'185 already been dec ded by development One rebson or concern s not the amount of indus::rial and w:1t.,:ln L.m':...'tsJ wtdcri ';..1""e Chamber feels is not in exces bjt also beCEiclSe prospec' ve ...nd,.;s TIes expect a certain amount of protection from enc:roachm1ent or non conform.Lng sese Mr 0 S rachan sta):.ed that Ll\e Anaheim Chamber of Commerce ha s gone on record opposing type of zon:ng; and r1as ostructed him to appear wherever such encroachment might cleve pro~est the action; and in this parti lay case9 the Chamber of Commerce ot ia requested that the City Counci d recommendat C Planning Commissiono Mr) Stracnan hJ.: ther po~,;,cE-;d fication wo:.rlj ncrease e 'Size cr aft surro'.mded 'tld.'; s~.r:;.a wt"e ;'er:d 5'~ Ea Nor and We that ~he granting of the reclassi- t~at would be completely 5 "ready in effect9 both on the b ss ng~ and _ne r: . ...; ~ " (3miv ~0ffi ared will require LL Jed ) CcG~cman SCD dGkGj My wa do Lng 0 a :s~ 0w~eI ,I wr Chamber of Commerce .Ji 318 "fig hi s property G Mr" 3tl'dchdn indcs:ries n SLO]ec: 3re and exp a ned thd~ persona ope.rICin an excess c-: tnd wo~ d be deve 'or 1j ~ ,)Jt.. d L E' - , i several yeeyears previously, He 3tated in his Ci did not have eel property an3W( J~ _'~,', a. 'L 'JV i::~ _~ .3;',~ J \Ie I', I/V '::1 ~""~,~~1';-'l,';"',:;";",,,-_*,,," '.i,"~";"~-_"_'4_""..,:""'~~;;,,,,"~~;;,,,,~~;,,.,,,_;,,:,~'~~ """_.._......"'-',.,...._..."..,.,.,"."',,,....--,=~ ,._...,~""~."""""""",;,,,..'. 7139 CitY" Halla Ananeim," CaliJornia- COU~IL MINUTES ~ October Ie 19630 3~00 PeMa Mro Stracrian furtner advised that the Board has approved the addition of one man to the staffi whose time will be devoted primarily in the field of :nd~strial development) Co~ncilman Chandler stated that the Council wa~ concerned with the possitili of hard and fast lines being drawn without reason9 and further stated tnat the COljncil wants to maintain the industrial policy but one that would not be completely adamanto He further felt that if an area was main~ained M' 19 sOlei beca~se it had been designated M-l on the proposed master plan t wo~ld be arbitrary; and advised that existing R-l areas must be cO;lsidered 3 wel as protection to all people involved in this pa1'~ic-: 81' a:rea IG k1im9 tne q:.Jestion was whether or not the recl a ssi f i cat co_~_:d cegranJLf?d wi :injuring anyone else d Mr. Strachan stated tha~ in is opinion9 and jUdging from their f?xperience In _he fIeld of lildustrial development and relationships between industry and housingj any expansion of residential development in this area would be detrimental no ~o the residentsi but to industry itselfo He further advised ~hat the residential area ng south of the Riverside Freeway should have no part cular nearing on the problem9 because of the natural Freeway bufferJ COLncilman Chandler referred to the law of supply and deman~9 and stated that as far as he has been anle to ascertain9 the cheapest land available waslndJstr.la~ ands wt~ C]i~, woul'd 1ndicate to him the lack of demand" MYa S~racha~ advised that not all industrially zoned land was sable for industrial developmenti and referred to the Huntington Beach area 9 whi cr" ind ca te s approximately 3 .1 00 acres zoned industria19 which actual has approximatey ;300 acres that can be developed industrialg as ine balance of ~he area was in 01 prod~ctiono He stated that this was true in many other areas. , ;21' _23 e prDgre~s made) Mru Strachan reported that S~Iles not ncluding plant expansion~ and r,_,'::8} ;'l(~W nc!.,Jstries9 plus plant expan'~' n -tn.at: Scon M,' '~..I ~.i J '.-- j Cur,:)i..:arn., compLimented Mr'1 Demler eK n~ wt ch the poultry business has D.:: e i r~ ~? Ti d .. D~.~~ e. ~ :~le 3 OJ :>8tj .. ::t ~ sr L ,_" e fam! tract was a em that every industry He repoTted that a heavy and has never developed the e R- to the South9 across <.e.:.e ~ v['-' ~, ~ "jwa a 3:J o. cepe N, ~ cas C ,X, arr, (.-. pr,)pe r'orn t'/:, d s6greed that the Demler ~ Freeway frontagea the property ,sand Dollar per acre premiumo p r cJpe, wo . ~. d -IV ::i.'} :1C :; . J j t. ~ rn a .. t: J I1E r '-' an 0'0 igation to the Jevelopment of the properties9 ~vethe problema He also ::ther noted that in this fOT purchase for an additional . njs aId _''1 '-'0 C-i :' './8 -. L-' pa 'leI :::\/ '"ichcoJ fac MI u 1 l\. ned3~ ..',1j,...<strial Area was the finest d) 3nd~he fact that there are Lhe area attracts others to a ~he applicant would not be indus<= mar.y h.. the aI'8a ~'Ci rrr,ed ~.n ,J 0. ,j ~.' ',8 j' r' .~. a Ei e ) 7140 City Halla Anaheim" California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES~" October ie, 1963" 3~OO P~M.. Mr. Lou HerbGt9 Owner of industria the Council and referred to a proposed trailer next to th~m 9 wh ich they ,JppO s~d ~ and further time9 the proper~y 5 being developed with an plant. ant on Lemon Street9 addressed park to have been located reported that at the present approximate Five Million Dollar In his opinion.) tf;,e Demler property could be sold for industry 9 if they wanted too He pointed out that not all industries wanted large acreage9 and stated that he and his brotherG purchased six acres of property in ord~r to acquire one 0 F.;:rther 9 that he knew of other small industries whose needs are for only two or three acres; that J st because a large parcel of property cannot be sold to a large indu certa did not mean that it could not be so~d by dividing iy sma_ler parc~ s. Mr. Herbst advised that R-3 encroacning into an industrial area downgradedtne industrial propertY9 and that industrial property deserved the ~ame protection as other zoned propertleso Mr. Sens advised that priorlo s coming to Anaheim approximately eighteen years ago) he had been a consulting engineer in Ohioo He stated tha~ two things attract :nd~5trYtO an areaj and they are taxes and cheap laboL, Mr. Adolph Schoepe stated cha in his opinion9 the area should be developed for industry as panned. He stated that industries paid their way as far as 'C3xes go and qce :oned whether or not apartment wouldo He fJrther advised that ChamDers or Commerce spend considerable money attracting indH3tries to 'thei r area C():'.mc 1ma:' Cr:.and~~e:i' noted tt.e app,!:'ox:i.mate fifteen thousand man labor force at AJtonetic in Ananeim and stated that the move of their activities from the Los A~geles area to An3heim has not moved the people into tois a~eao COJDcilman Cha~dler aSKed t would not be reasonable to assume that there was ::n5~filcl reasonaD_y priced ho~sing in the City of Anaheim to attract these people from the Los Angeles area. Counc~lma~ Chandler f~rtner stated at A~tonetics was one of the motiva~ing factors In se:~ aside the No~theast Industrial Areag and that they were also~he pr:me mot:va~:~g actor:n ~he Council1s attempt to hold as solid a line as possicle; and s~il be reasonableo To him9 the obligation of the Counc_l was to ev~ryone ~n the Ci_yo d.~d planned My, c:....oepe was O~ ,2 -Jp:~ came ~o De ~g t~e sp tne P a~n Departmen) on t~at ':he Northeast lndustrial Area mome~G~ and fe t SLre it had been CCI ,'.mat~ .1.:... a j v:.> (~ j t t. :3_ act ,d Y P 3fl"jeJ I n d a 4r 0? a f r M 9 an.,) ma~e "rj pr c~p e wa er;:,nc a proper r a pa ~c regaTd~ess Jl J2VS e ,::irea . ~,..... a ~ L- r,. d .-'~ 09 Department had not of the Northeast Lo maKeLhe area salable However~ at that time the :de a va st amount of ca~egor cal y for that use9 d area as reasonable C81j t ~< f:: C.. \..,'" C0 de ve ,-,pm E\, e; ~': L.. '-. j :.;e~.j d _, e ;x,'j j a,:ed orme wa a po ib",e. ind f) !^".l :ep,-' ,e:1 e J and commencement '1. ''N'r.... c ,~ ,d. "-... c)E~9. dL,'z';,,) A, Peen approximately ; Dr. Johnston9 Victor dcr~s in th~ northeast 1922 J ~ when a group at m'..~1 , P' let;;:; 5e 3. ~du .' are3. '3 Al'!ai')e 1m, s Ulse call.ed recogr z '.L unsound nves~ment. t!"'.at s COmmL;rJ'~ : e " (.erta j d\ MI, OerrL..er wO...:l d [:,ave no difficul ty .T::d s, Geed ..::>8 rea:; Freeway f rontageo He e epUI'LeJvacancy f ae Lor 59 and although prope ~Je" add to an Mr. Scroepe a 5 payrollsg and needs 5e ~. Autor,et i c s mate IV e aJ,v j ,j, with an catejthat approxi- Cotmty area ~ jC.:J ~ .,1.- I if e y m:..' v :,..;J ~;"';:;~'_""~,"",.......~,....,_Cj~,c-..k".___.,.._"__.,."."",,,~."~,,"'_ ...",.... ,'-- "" r~-."~ V'f"t ~ .~.-..,., "''''""''.,,'''''*'"'''',..,...., _.~ 7141 Cit Hall Anaheim c- 'tornla ~. COUNCIL MINUTES -~ October 1 1963 3:00 p.Ma Mr. Logan Moore stated that two problems were involvedo Firstg what kind of a commcnlL'l does the City wish to develoP9 and second~ wha.t do industries wanta He noted bY their absence9 the adjacent industries are apparent} not too concerned~ In his opiniong concern of industry was the overall concept ot The City COGncil in providing an atmosphere within reason that al ~he factions of the City can live in9 and further felt that industries were very concerned aoout housing for their employees. Coune Iman Chandler advised Mr. action was taKen oy the Cl~y Co~ncil, the in evidence" and we:re specific concerning the question was how close~o an encroachment, Moore that when the original industrialists in the area were residential encroachment; however do you Come before it is termed Mr. Demler~ n answering Councilman SchutteUs question9 a.dvised that many a~tempts and con~acts have been made in an effort to sell the property for M-l. Mr0 Demler f~rther advised that the R-l area was developed prior to the Freewav~ and Defore any of the area was rezoned to M-l. He noted the close proxImity of school faciI tiesg and was of the opinion that the proposed development would create no problems for the schoolso Mayor Coons stated that 1n his opinion~ a good cross section of the ssue has been preserlted9 and thereupon declared the hearing closed4 Councilma~ DLtton s~a~edthat tDe Cl Council in setting the policy recognizes the impor~ance of industry to the CitY9 and in his opinion9 'there wasn LC any necessity to reaffirm their pasi tionG However;) every appl cant has a right to aSK for a change of zoning on his propertY9 and every appl cant Is entitled to considerationo In checking ~he }~es and reading the Interdepartmental Report9 CODncllman D ton ~oted tha the onI o~ject on presented by any industry 1 n ~ r: e a; e d IN a a -.) D J -, ....,,' '- .~ ~ r. e p a ~ f)';:' 1 0 1 ~ I a f fIe 0 He c a II e d at ten t ion LO ~L;~ R R J '0 :1:~:-:~~ Le'~ween them and industrYa he ca eo L..e" and noted that to the Nc:: F,.v\.Jd COf< Channel; to the West an 8.)(.. J:: </e,_.~r:t:j ~-e -:.:.' ere Riverside Freeway; and to the Ea31. pr~ J_ :; ,) C~~f.?, 1J::I)t: (.Iv (,wneT to buffeI9 by means of a _Tir-' (;f M Jt:'v'e upr.'::,' -to 'the East" for their pro::e._ ~C ..j ~,.'t:I :e:J",jen d., oevelopment easterlYa " c--_ _mar ~Te_r. ~e1elrej ~O a recen reclassification from M-l _S up ~ne proper did nave a natural buffer between ~:cpe:...., .:) ,J,)~c ec p:::opel'1:':y:. Concerning the Demler re ~d D~tfer ~0at existed in the other 6 vVei, Ov _'E:: Cc. c~.i. would be requested to J rJ!Ol e c.. ,::;( ~ ~ C) a:n(d wo d be requested to further ,J R.. j w t., e J e -'e ~ j ,) _. a prope.~ .... c::i2,e9:H,\d te,> fLore e r. C i (.I a C" 'HI2 n t e "' J::; .~ 1 .:1 d It: a, c:.c C.J. J. fTidrl CJ :L l: I e 1 ,a L t r. e C: _ y C ou n c :i 1 was 0 ve r 1 y opt i m i 5 tic aIGdJe_-.l:3'ia:.eo Oy trLe blue symbol on the pro- j J.)(.~ JeVl"i upea ....ildls"'rlal. He stated the j'~ p ~ a fie would be maintained and :'ILd ropej~):":Iongl y tnat the maximum area would j ~u ~3 opinJon the Council was aware of je~ Jna~ed M- W001d probably not be so developed. clnd [) .;) ,.d '_ 31 0: posed mas~eL Z J mJp N0 ~a~ en r v dteJ j p. held a SOL jly ~~ po o~ develop M ; huW2\e: N~ tne fact Lna~ d prOr,2~ -=-r C(;Gn~:j . ..0 o. .:epo a;:tent on ~o aib ,o,tATt were SuDstant a cha: t~e 0 Pan n t\ 9 C ~i rnm ='3 J ~ 0 n Jail d ::> ;qd S :... e;] reclaS5 f ca~ p an~ De ml tree for rev:ew 3nd ;:epGY U:2 01 toe Planning Department calling tledto the City Council this date flal plans considered by the City toe event the Council favored the Ie erred the Interdepartmental Com- e -" A and Planning Commissiona 7142 City HallQ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES-~ October la 1963", 3:00 PeM. Mr. Kreid1c presen<::~ed Interdepartmental Report concerning original plansg and noted that the ast Staff Report referred to the previous ones in the application files. Suggested conditions in the event the reclassification was approved were read by Mayor Coons. City Attorney advised that s nce there has been a revision to the four Tentative Tract Map5~ it would require referral to the Planning Commission for recommendations; that this would not necessarily affect zoning actiono -, FJrther jisc'Jssion was held) and at the conclusion thereof 9 on motion by Co~ncilman Duttonj seconded by COLnc Iman Chandler, it was the finding of tne City Co~nc that a port:on of subject property was found to be susceptible to reclass ficai:lon to Ro~39 b..xtJthat the plan for a portion onlY9 and a portion to remain ill the M- Zoneg had not been reviewed by the City Planning Commission9 fur z:; reasonj the application be referred back to t:he City Planning Commiss on fOI review and recommendations9 with report to the City Council October 299 1963, 3:00 OUCloc~ P~M. Councilman Dutton requested roll call vote on the foregoing motionQ AYES ~ NOES~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton9 Chandler and Schlitte. Krei and Coonso Notle 0 Mayor Coons declared tne foregoing MOTION CARRIEDo On motion by Co~nc:lman Dutton seconded oy Councilman Chandler9 action by the City Counci on Reclassification No. 63-64-17 was continued to October 29~ 19639 3:00 P~M.9 for report and recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOr:ON CARRiEDQ TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NOSQ2267a 5268a 5269 AND 5270~ Manco Development CompanY9 developers. In accordance wi verbal request of Mro Logan Moore9 on behalf of MrJ Demler9 Tentative Maps9 Tracts Nos. 52679 52689 5269 and 5270 were referred back to the City Plann::~ng Commission for report and recommendation9 on motion by Councilman D,'tton9 seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a fifteen minLte recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motiono MOTION CARR-ED. .lO:~5 P~M~ AFTER RECESS i Mayor Coons caL :i~d Ghe meeL ,"dtG aIde:::- all melTiDerS of the City Co' 10 C : be:: n 9 p r f> S e :r: '. . PUBL:C HEARING,! RE:LA3S~:F,Ct\ LQN Subm_tted Els e M. ~d W FL'ink ~ eque t-flg tl 1192 1 .~ m t, 0 n , - _ d t?~! n d ~e r tor V I r U 1 t P 1 e fllT L Y r i 10c1 te(j on tne nor th 02 St3 te-_~011eg2 Boule\t no. NO~ 636~-29 AND :OND_~:ONAL USE PERMIT NO. 469: 11 ~). P:J!dy., --'.:::--r(Ohlenberger and Charles B. f ZO'le f.rofT' R A '~O ti -J ,} W,ller of one'~story height :.!'cl I?,),.. r ,~r;,~ft:, <id pE'Tfr_ on to O\1,;truct 3 two= 1\::0 Ie ,,',12/1'C L 02 ~Cprfiej~ WitD:i!port:3 on property f PI t, f\ i.,?n'J~ :1 ppr o IC. IT a te 450 feet ea,3 t of 1~?43 i\JOI"tfl Pie-TIt A'\le'Otlert The i ty P I3nnLng Comm." 1963.64" recommended He:: ~ )j the tollow.~ng ond tLOrt,; PUl u.n t f I- Oil ~o :he.l Resolut on NOe 897, Series I 63-64-29 fOl ~pproval, subject to 1. fh3t the owner; of,ubJect proper,,! 'ih311 deed to the r:; ty of Anaheim a Jtrip of 1 ind 4:) feet n wid th fI OfT cne en tel L:..ne of tne street, along PI ~ent Avenue,~nd the pl.OpO . u de fOl tr.eet widening purposes. 2_~ T:h t t.Iee"t ~.~rr~'pl-(>':J~~~m!-f.;rl ~~ p-L.dr~ ~ b::.:~ pr"1.9'p .T'ied-Jnd 11 engineering re.-. quirements of the of A0 n~ IT ilong PI tL3 Avenue, ~nd the proposed i "de u r b ',n.) gutter;, .,dc:!N, lk, " I ee t grading and "",i(;.~o:c;::;;;~_:.j;;_.,,',:":..;_:;:;,;; " -._..:~:;:;'.:.:~_.,..,:.~'; ~ - -_.------,"""""1'. -"tit ---.-_;,_,';.;;.~- or y---,q- Cit Anaheim. California ~. COUNCIL MINUTES ,= October 1 7143 3~OO P.M. paving, drain~ge f~cilities~ or other appurtenant work shall be complet- ed as requlred by the: ty Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and speciflc tions on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in ~n ,mount and form s3tisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted wlth the .~ ty to guarantee the installation of said engineering requiremen t~. 3~ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the :sum of $2(100 per fron t foot ;dong Placentia Avenue, and the proposed cul-de~.(:, for str-eet lighting purpose.5. 4~ That the completion of the3€ reel i '1ification proceedings is contingent upon the grinting of Con~dd tlon=.;l U~3e Permit No. 469. 5. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 3-foot overhang ed3ement along the northerly boundary of subject property,> 6" That the U~Not Partjhall be incorporated wi thing the developm~nt or a petition filed for T!eclassification to the R-3, Multiple Family Re~idential~ 2oneo 7. Th3t Condition Nos. l~ 2, 3, and 53 above mentioned1 shall be complied with within a p9riod of 180 d8YS from date hereof, or such further time as the C ty Council may granto 8. That subject property sh-jll be developed 2>ubst8ntially in accordance with plan~ ~nd spec f 3tlon~ on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No.1; Exhibit No~ 13 and Exhibit No.2. The City Planning Corruni:3slon pursuant to their Resolution No. 898, Series 1963-649 granted 3aid Sonditional Use Permit, subject to the following condition~) IQ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit~ to be used for park and recreation purposes~ ;aid ~mountto be pdid at the time the building permit is lG':3uedo 2. That trash storage ~red5 shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on f ~e in the ~ffice of the Director of Public Works~ prior to findl bu:lding inspection~ 3~ That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be nece~;sary by the Chief of the Fire Department~ to be installed prior to fin31 building inspectiono 4,Th ._ t 'JL~G{1d tic,:; j. Reel N(; P t~ rIT .1 ?9" grJnted 5ubject to the completion of 5. :'hi :: pI ~o ~ 1, nd ~ plopert p,;.' fic ~.I , \I ''-)J )[11 ~l be 0<2r2 Loped .,ub,t::mtially in3ccordance with f.te w to tne of Anaheim, marked Revision :~ ;.. ~j r. ,,\ (J t l. r~ \.~'. L_ .J 60 Th t tr,eewel ,111.1 tie pro'l ded.pp:ro.x:im'::ttely 40 foot intervals in the P 1 .,2 n t .14. le'1 ue p. r K W, t t ~ n g', u bj ,e, t pr 0 pe r t Y:J t hat p 1 a n s for "d treewe 1 ,] n.j t n e p ~ t~ ng of tr lee., there.d19 sha 11 be submitted to ana ~pproved DY the SuperLntendent of P3rkw2Y Maintenance, and that said treewel1~ n1 1 be p. ted w._tn tree prior to final building inspection. My. M.:H t -;.n '<Ie: d t ted rt..'; i. uses and :1 :~he.lT'mea and on,ideL{~d b t;le , tiP rev i J e d pia :, P...1 -,-ADm t t::: d ,t on 0 f mb) ec t property and the exist ing !te ~re~, Drlefing the evidence submitted to~ :1!m~_ng ::;omm.) ~on1 l1ing attention to the t- 1,C1 t1'2 11 ng ['tle M Y01 Jkea. f w i-; h e d t 0 -i C1 d:r ':: [- 1'J!t? C +: cne ~jpp-<. int or /'L }gent was present and .I. . Ntl .[1' Hoc!ge' ~ 1'09 :3ou tli t Street, authorized agent f or the pe t ~. O:1er.J' <0 I ,20 tn! t u9ge~J t ions made by the Pl:Jnn.ing;t f f J; :.0) weT m <11:: 0 ~h~ plo:. pLin:; and they felt the -"''''~,~...'.="'''--'=.;.~._"...~ -"--_."._......""'..''''O".~'"'''...~.~_-'k;ji!i;!,~~~ . t 7144 Ci tv HalL. Anaheim" California ,- COUNC'~::" MINUTES- October l~ 1963, 3;00 P.M. revised plan waC;'i con~:;ider-1ble improvement. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor d::,;ked if anyone e15e wj~ned to address the City Council, for or against subject 3ppl ~tions, there being no re8ponse, declared the hearlng closeda RESOLUTION NOa 63R-796~ Councilman S,chutte offered Resolution No. 63R-796 for adoption, sU'3taining the action of the C ty Plann:lng Commi5:sion~ authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, sub- ject to the City Planning ComrniSS.,on .recommendation:;)\) Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLU?IOl\J OF THE .::;.~ ::;U0NC',:. OF :'f-4E" OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT r c.E 18 OF THE A.\JAHE M MUN' c: PAL ::ODE RELA:- i~C; [0 ZON~NG SHOULD BE AMEI'PED AN'D ..,.... ..~.' ';.AT'~.,TE POU.N.. 'DAR .. F..')' ,fjj::. "C-' 'CAc \, Z;J'I'''J:;':~ ;'Lf'O!~" D '~J:;' /~w. ". .;' N"~ED r 63 64 29 R 3) ., . ".1 - h - ./ ._K '. ..,~ '. ~~"))" ." .J~. b;.....J,. j(-l \J @ - ,_ _ _ On roll 11 the fO.Tf'9oLng rf'>olc."t.on W:Jj duly pdssed and adopted by the follow~ng vote: AYES; NOES~ ABSENT 6 COUNC ILMEN: COUNC"'.LMFN" COUNC=LMEN: Dutton" Chdndlerg Schutte, Krein and Coons. None" None" The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R""796 duly pasGed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO" 63R'~797~ Counc Iman Schutte of f@r~d Resolution No. 63R-797 for adoption~ granting Conditional Use Permit No. 469~ and under the authority of Section 18064,,070, waiv~ng the requirement of garages in lfuJ of carports~ the one=story height limitation within 150-feet of R~A, Residential-Agricultural zonej and the required G ~.de'md re aT 'Y'drd ''jet backs'J in accordance with re- commendations of the City Pl::tnning :::::ommi~,3ion. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLU~ION OF THE :: '~\ \:~:)LJNC "L OF [HE ~~1T( OF ANAHEi:M GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERM:r NO. 469. On roll ..:-:11 tne ~:or2go~ng re.,oJut ~O[1 Wi5 duly passed dnd adopted by the cllowlng vote~ AYES~ NOES~ ABSENTg COUNC ILMEN ~ COUNCILMEN ~ COUNC ~TLMJEN ~ Dut':on~ Chandler9 Schutte~ Krein and Coons. None" None" The Mayor declared Resolution NOe 63R-797 duly passed and adoptedo RECLASSIFICATION NOB 63'~64~11 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO" 453~ Mr. Kreidt re.., ported for Council information th3t reclassification Noo 63-64-11 and Condi- tional U'Se Permi.t No.. 453 were withdr~wn at the City Planning Commission meeting of September 16, 1963, as subject properties were included in Reclas- sification No. 63-64~29 and Conditional Use Permit No" 469. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATiON NO.. 63 -64,.,31 AND \\lAR~LANCE NO.. 1602~ Submitted by Glen Eo and Elizabeth Bo Boyles and Wallace Carter requesting a change of zone from R-A to C=l and wa ver of two Jnd one-half tory height limitation and waiver of required amount of parking on property located on the east side of Euclid Street 3pproximatel~ 876 feet north of Crescent Avenue, and further described as ~28 and 732 North Euclid~ The City Pldnning 1963'-64 ~ recommended Rec; If conditionsg ,"""'" " \..pommJL Lon purGuantto Resolution No~ 899, Series ion No~ 63~64=31, ~ubject to tha following 1. That the owners of eet property Ghall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet width from the centerline of the street along Euclid Street fOT;tr,eet widening pUTpose~:;a 2. That street improvement pl~ns sh 11 be prepared and all engineering requirements of the C of Anaheim 310n9 Euclid Street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks~ street grading dnd paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work~h,ll be ompleted required by the City Engineer and in cordan~e with tandard plans 3nd spec fications on file in the Office of the C ty Engineer; ~ndthat ~ bond in an amount and form 'i.i:A;'>~'.''i''''-''';:';~~ ~~-~";'""=~~..,,.., 7145 City H311~ An3heim~ C~LifgrniE ~COUNCIL MINUTE~ ~ October lq 1963. 3~OO PoMo catisfactory to the City of An3heim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the insta l~tion of 3aid engineering requirementSt 3~ That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2$00 per front foot dlong Euclid Street, for street light- ing pUrp03€ ..:J a 4$ ThHt the complet~on of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of V~riance NOa 16020 50 That Condit:on Nos~ 1, 2, 8nd 3, ;bove mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council m~y grsnt. 6e) That subject proprty Grk.li be de'JelOped :;ubstantially in accordance with planG ~nd specifi~~tion~ on file with the City of Anaheim~ marked Exhibit NOh L~ 2} :,no 3. 7. Th;t; 6-foot strip of l~nd shdll be land5caped and said landscaping m3~nt~ined~ s indic~ted on Exhibit No. 1 on file with the City, that pl~ns for s~id land~c~p~ng ~h~ll be submitted to and approved by the Superin tendent of P,rkwiY M:~interunc~q and th:;t sa id landscaping sha 11 be installed prio=to fin~l building inspectiona 80 That J 6~foot masonry w~ll Ghall be constructea along the east property line pr~or to fln~~ builaing ~nspection. 90 ~h~t? bond in ~n amount lnd form s~ti3f3ctory to the City of Anaheim ~hall be po~ted with the - to guarantee the construction of a wall where prOp(9rt:e3 :b..rtto the R~AJ Re3:~dent::31 Agrircul tural Zone. 100 Th3t treewe_i lh~ll be ~ded It 3pproximately 40 foot intervals in the Eu,:= l:d~ :TtHJt p,..rKw~::butU.ng)ubj ect propertY:1 tha t plans for s~ia treewe_ls ino p. .:}t~~g of trees therein~ shall be submitted to and approvea by the Super~ntendent of Parkw~v Maintenance~ and said treewe~l ,II be pljnted w:thtree'3 prior to final building inspec- tion.. 11. rh'1t:1l.1:j",1 -<:ond~,t~_OI:',ig fiG_i:. L:~e3 ~;)hall be contained within the bu:.ldi!ng or proper.. J.el.ded from viewo The City Plann:lng Com.fII~~:):si.on pur~3u.~nt to Resolution NO$ 900~ Series 1963-64, granted S;3ld :n:.ance'J ;;ubj e:: t to the following conditions: 1" 2. ~'h.1 t tr;::u,h tord.gl(0 ;re pl~ns on f~~e in the off final bu:ld.ng pect.on. Th~t fire hydr~nt~ 11 be ~nst lIed 5 required and determined to be necea T) b~ the Ch_ef of the Fire Dep~rtment9 to be installed prior to f I bu.ld ..ng ~d1')pe..:t"on. ThJt thic, ",mc€ ~ gr'~nted <'JuDj\ect to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 63-64-31. ~hat subwect propert ~h II be developed substantially in accordance with plans \nd spe' f t~ons on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhib::t Nor;, 1, 2~H1d 3J ~hat 2 6Efoot ~rip of l~nd shdll be landacaped and said landscaping maint~~nedi lna ted on Exhibit NOm 1 on file with the City, that plans for '_d l~nd~~~ping ~h~ 1 be 1ubmitted to and approved by the Supe=~ntendent of P~rkw~ M1intenance; dnd that said landscaping shall be ~nstj led pr_or to f 1 bu~ld_ng tion. ThJt 6-foot ~~sonr w~~l sh II be onstructed along the east property ine pr~ fin2~ bu Id~ng pect:on. Thi t ,1 bond :In 1Ifountind U, f tory to the City of Anaheim sh~ll be po~ ted withtne r_ to guar2ntee the construction of a wall where propeI~..er:J ab)L to the R"A1 Re identlal Agricultural, Zone. Thdt treewell 1hall be provided ~t1pproximcitely 40~foot intervals In the Eucl a Street p~rkwc: ~butt~ng 3ubject property~ that plans for a:d treewell 1nd tne plantIng of tree therein, shall be submitted to and 3pproved by the Superintendent of P~rkway Maintenance~ and that aid treewell ~h211 be pj~ntea wIth tree~ prior to final building ~h211 b~ provided in accoraance with approved e of the Director of Public Works~ prior to 30 4, 5" 6. 7 , 0 8. in~jpectLon, 90Th a t 11 j i I . 0 n d i t building or properl f l.~t e:i c:;hall be cont..dned within the florr:new~ Mr. I<.reIdt noted the:it:ion of 3ubject property and uses and zoning in the sUTround~ng Jre , bI ef~ng the evidence submitted to and considered by the C tyP.L-:mrL",ng ~omtIPi ion. He advised that no one appeared in opposition to the reque~ted three ~tory buildingQ ....1.-~ 7146 City Hall_ Anaheim~ California ~. COJ!!-C;:L MINUTES- October 1, 1963" 3:00 P.M. The Mayor asked f the dPpl ant or hi5 agent was present and wished to address the City Councils Mr. Ray Spehar, Agent for the petitioner, advised that conditions of the two Planning Commission resolutions require a 6 foot masonry wall along the easterly property line. He called attention to an existing 20 foot alley adjacent to said property line~ and requested that they be allowed to place said wall 3 feet inside their property line~ with a bumper guard along the west line of the alley to prevent possible damage to the wall from traffic use of the alley. Mr. Spehar further requested that the 2 foot block wall along the North and South property lines be eli~inated and that landscaping of the North and South boundaries be left to their discretion, and further explained plans for landscaping" The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council for or against the appl ations) there beIng no respon5e~ declared the hearing closed" Discussion was held by the City Council and it was determined that placement of required 6 foot masonery wall 3 feet back of property line, as requested by Mro Spehar, would be compliance of Condition No.8 of the reclas- dification. RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-798~ Coun~ilm8n Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-798 for adoption~ sustaining theJ.ction of the City Pl~nnlng Corrunission~ authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordin8nce~ chdnging the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Comm~_j:5ion~ amending Condition No.6 by adding: ilVexcept that the dpplicant may sub5ti tute planting in lieu of the 2 foot block wall 3t hIS own option. 3nd eliminating Condition No.9. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CI~Y COUNC:.L OF fHE elTY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT IITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNIC::PAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED $ 63-64-31 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote~ A Y'ES ~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNC ~~LMEN ~ COUNCILMEN: C OUNC 'I LME N :~ Dutton~ Chandler9 Schutte~ Krein and Coons$ Ncne. None3 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R~798 duly passed and adopted$ RESOLUTION NO. 63R~799~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-799 for adoption, granting V3T ance Noo 1602~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning ComroJ..ssion, Jmending Land tion No~ 4 by adding, ~Uexcept that the applicant may substitute pl~nting lieu of the 2 foot block wall at his own option~ 3nd chjngingCond tion No. to redd~ "'The block wall or solid fence requirement t the south bound_iry of tne propertY>..i hereby waived. ijl! Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLU~ION OF 1'"' ~c 'J :OUNC ~ OF ~ OF ANAHE~=M GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1602. On roll call the foregoing resolution WdS duly passed and adopted by the following vote~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT; COUNC lLMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNC ':LMEN: Dutton, iChandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. Noneo The Mayor de~l~red Re301ut_on No. 63R-~99 dUl passed and adopted$ "~,<,,::,"~<'4.~'';'j;:")';F<'':,i,~.,~:;';'',"..;,._...::;...,,,.'-'-'_.i~,,_.;.o.:;..:...,..,k;~ ~"'&~om:T"'~',-,;.."". 7147 Citv HalL. AnaheimQ California- COUNCIL MINUTES ,- October lQ 1963Q 3~OO P.M. RESOLUTION NOa 63R.800i. Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-800 for adoption. Because of a pOSS1ble conflict of interest9 Mayor Coons withdrew from Lhe discussion and action on this issue9 and Mayor Pro Tem Chandler assJmed Chairmanship of the meetingij Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYIN'3 TO THE C fTY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC ur =LITY PURPOSES. (Franci s J. Schiller 9 et al) On Toll call the foregoing resolution was dUly passed and adopted by the fo ow~ng vo~e~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN= Dutton;; SCh:...'Cte9 Krein and Chandlero NOES: COUNCILMEN. None, ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None~ ABSTAINED FROM VOTING: COUNCILMAN: Coons. adopted The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 63R=800 duly pa~sed and ORDINANCE NOv 1917... Mayor Coons withdrew from the discussion and Council action on th.i 5 i.:3 2Lje Co~nsilman DutTon offered Ordinance No. 1917 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONLNGu (61-62-69(9)'~ M=l and P~L) After nearing read in ful the title of Ordinance Noo 1917 and having knowledge of the contents thereini Councilman Chandler moved the reading n f~_ of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion) MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDo Mayor Coons res<.lmed Chairmanship of the meetingo DEEDS OF EASEMENT~ 63R-803g both Co~ncllman Chand er offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-801 to lnclus:ve~ for adoption. R'efer to Reso on BOOk" RESOLUTION NOw 63Rcco80.;. ~ A RESOLU fION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM .ACCEPT~N~ A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Walt Disney Produc~ions) RESOLUTION NO, 63R802: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A i3RANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Allan FainbaI99 e~ a RESOLUTION NO~ 63Rc803: A RESOLUrrON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A3RANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Katella Rea ) On ro cal tne foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote; AYES; NOES~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN; COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schuttej Krein and Coons. None. None) The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-801 to 63R-803, both inclusive, dul passed and adoptedo -;.tL~'.':.~;_4'_;.~- -",,,,,",'-', _I I .-."'W.--:..-__ 7148 City HalL. Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES '" October 10 1963.. 3:00 P"M" LEASE - WATER WELL: Mr" Murdoch presented lease for Council consideration to temporarily lease water well from the Yorba fami to provide water south of the Santa Ana River; west of Jefferson Street. Terms and conditions of the lease were explained by Mr.. Murdoch. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-804: Councilman Scnutte offered Resolution No.. 63R-804 for adoption) Refer ~o Resolut~on BOOkt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH- ORIZING THE EXECUT:ON OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND u'USERS" 9 WH.:CH SHALL IDENTIFY MABEL ANN YORBA~ BERNARDO M" YORBA, JACK M" YORBA AND EDNA G, YORBA, FOR THE LEASING OF WATER PRODUCING FACILITIES TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE FURNISHING OF WATER TO USERS FOR DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION PURPOSES, FOR A TEMPORARY PERIOD,. (Water Well Lease) On rol cal the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: DJt~on9 Chand eri Schuttei Krein and Coonso NoneJ Non!a 3 The Mavor dec~ared Resolut:on NOm 63R-804 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE~ The following correspondence was ordered received and filed9 on motion by COJncil.man DOl.tton seconded 0'1 C00:nci.1,man Chandlero MOTION CARRIED: a. Applicatl.onbefcre the Pdblic Uti ~ies Commission of the Atchison9 Topeka and San~a F Rallway Company ~o increase multiple ride coach fares between L05 Angeles and Fullerton9 Anaheim and Santa Ana. b. Department of Water Re30jrces Summary of Secretary Udall ~ s ulPacific Southwest Wate~ Plan c. Application No) 4556.7 Detore t:t\e P,-,:c c Uti tles Commission regarding ILles governing desig~ constr);ctian te5ting~ maintenance and operation of uti gas transm~sslon and distrlb~tion systems and superseding Genera Order No. 12. MEMBERSHIP, FEATHER RIVER PROJECT ASSOCIATION: On report and recommendation of the City Managerj Co~ncilman Krein moved that City of Anaheim membership in the Feather River Project Association be renewed for one year. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT .~ PROPERTY TO BE CLEARED: Mr. Thornton Eo Piersal19 Director of Public Works9 reported the following described properties have not been cleared~ after noticffito clear said properties were sent in accordance with provisions of Cr_apter 1 of the Anatu;'llTI M,.m.icipa Code; A,P, 74~' S A.Po 83c2?O-39 AoP. A(}Po 140.-03 101'20 On moticon b/ CC,.nc Jman S 'i! secondedbv Councilman Chandler, the Cl Clerk was instructed to set p~bl C hearing October 159 1963, 7:00 OiClock P~M.9 for cons~deration proposed removal of weeds9 rubbish9 refuse 9 rank growth 9 and dLr 9 including dead trees and shrubs 9 from properties within the Ci of Anaheim as reported by the Director of Public Works. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOg 63R-805: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R~805 for adoptiono Refer co Reso ~lon BOOK~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF CERTAIN FUNDS FOR ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING ANAHEIM VISITOR AND CONVENTION BUREAU AS AGENT FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO HANDLE THE EXPENDITURE OF SAID FUNDS AND AUTHORIlINC) A CONTRACT fO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AND SAID AGENT. ;.,~'i<,;;'jt'..,ijf~~:,t:.:,_,_",_,,_:;;..;_,,:__;.;;.....i,~__:_;;__;:-- ,.......-- 7149 Citv Hallu Anaheim~ Calitvrnia.. COUNCIL MINUTES ... October 1" 1963" 3~00 P.M. On roll ca~ the foregoing Resolution NOQ 63R-805 wa~ duly pa~~ed and adopted D~ the low~ng vote~ AYES~ NOES: ABS ENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNC ':::LMEN ~ Dutton9 Chandler9 Schutte, Krein and Coonso None. None. The Mayor dec ared Resolution No. 63R-805 dUly passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS NOS. 344 AND 349: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 8889 SerIes 196Jx(4) recommending termination of petitions for Conditional Use Perm.. is No;'5 Q 344 and 3499 wa S submj tted 0 Said resolution noted that Cond tlonai U;e Perm: No" :344 was f 1. < ad on property on which the peti tioner no .onger wi5~e3 to eStdDJ sh tra er park Jse~ whereas property included in CondL tiona Ufve PeTIT! '- Nc) 349 has been incorporated in Conditional Use Permit Noo 45 ) RESOLUTiON NO~ 63R~80t; Co~rlcilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-806 for adopt termina _ng a~~ proceedings in connection with Conditional Use PermIts NOSJ 344 8nd 349. Refer~o Reso :on BOOk. A RESOl.UTION OF fHE CI;Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEED=N~S LN C~)NNECTi.ON\N~:rH CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS NOSQ 344 AND 349. Or' .... i 1.... Co i....t~e t o:re9o resolu~ion was duly passed and adopted ty ':J: e 0 OW.~ .:]\/0 'L8 : AYES. COUNC .~LMEN ~ COUNC :LLMl:.N ~ COUNC TLMEN ~ DJtton Chandler9 Schutte9 Krein and Coons. None. Noneo NOES. ABS ENT ~ The Maier declared Reso10tio:, No. 63R-806 duly passed and adopted. INVITATION ... SOUTHERN CAL'cFORNiA PLANNING CONGRESS ~ Excerpt from the City Planning Commlss:on m~ ;tes of their meeting held September 309 1963, invit- ing tne C: - CC.'Lci at end the Southern Cal fornia Planning Congress meeting to Le '~e~j Tr 3da OCtOber 9 1963. at the Charter House Hote19 ~OO OUCiock P M. Wb .:;.:.orr;. ~ed and read by the City Clerk. It was noted that Anahelm ~ .he ~l c ~V for the meeting0 APPOI NTMENT . DEPUTY (1 ry CLERK:. fhe Ci t y Cl eyk announc ed the appo intment of Marilyn A. We as Dep wj C~ Clerk~ to act during the absence of the City Clerk and Dep.J wV Ci Cl.~::,rk Alana MJ Farrens~ and for the purpose of con- dLcting any and a 1 6peC~aj or genera~ municipal elections4 On mo on by CoJnc iman te9 seconded by Councilman Chandler9 said appOiLntmen~ was L:1. oed by :..rJ.e Ci COdncilo MOTION CARRIEDQ PERMISSION TO LEAVE lH1= STAlE:. Co.~ncilman AQ J. Schutte was granted permission to leave the sate ',)vn fTIGCi.l.)fl by COI:.~nc im?n D,^ tton 9 seconded by Councilman Krein, MOT,ON CARRIED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND WORIS. SCHEDULE. Co...mcllrnan Chandler advised that when the meeting of the Co~nc s nel.d on employee work rules and salaries~ he is planning to propos2the Inc ~sion of the position of "Administrative Secretary91 lor 'aaen deparLmenL He noted th,at such a classification exists in onlY departmen and ~des all advancements until said position becomes vacan L J He: r e::t -~gge5 ted tnat consideration be gi ven to whether or not there d be created an Assistant Department Head status in the City Clerk Us 01 ce the y C~ Clerk. 7f,'>;"'.'""--.;.~'"'~ift I I 7150 City HalL~ Anaheim~ California -~ COUNCIL MINUTES - October 10 1963a 3~OO P.M. JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESOLUTION: Mayor Coons submitted and read resolution from the Anaheim Junior Chamber of Commerce in support of the capital improvement bond issueo The City Council directed that a letter of appreciation be forwarded to the Anaheim Junior Chamber of Commerce. ADJOURNMENT: motiono Councilman Krein moved to adjourna MOTION CARRIED" Councilman Schutte seconded the ADJOURNED: 11~40 P"M. SIGNED: f)~ A. >>~Lc:.:'~ Ci ty Clerk ~-..,.~,.,."~,;i";,",.,_,, '+-."~.,~,.""",.c;"....',,,_ ,"""''''''-~;_:~'_,,< .:.'~' --....... ..:- ".'Y"~-"'--.--"ijjif;Jil:liii;j--"- -",-1W~~_,",'.,,"'