1959/03/18
3250
City Hall, Anaheim, California - March 17, 1959 - 7:00 P.M.
KATELLA PARK ANNEXATION: Recommendations of the City Planning-Commission, pursuant
to their meeting held March 169 19$9 were submitted and ordered received and filed.
RESOLUTION NOG 5106: Councilman Pearson offered Resolution No. 5106 and moved fa
its passage and adoptiono
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE COM-
4
MENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM. (Katella Park Annexation)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES;
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNC I LMEN:
Borden, Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Pearson moved to adjourn to March 18, 1959, 7:00 P.M.
Councilman Borden seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
.,
ADJOURNE~:40 ,P.M.) '_ .
SIGNED: ~.~
City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - March 18, 1959 - 7:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Fry, Pearson and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: Borden and Coons~
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner.
CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: Thornton Piersallo
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Robert W. Mungallo
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Schutte, who made the following
statement:
This is the third public hearing we have held to consider the new proposed
zoning ordinance for the City of Anaheim and to give all of you an opportunity to
present any suggestions which may be helpful to us in arriving at a final decision
in this matter. We are glad to have your ideas and your suggestions, and they will
all be carefully considered before we finally adopt this ordinance.
We have reached a point in these hearings where it is now necessary for
the Council to hold a series of work sessions and endeavor to complete the draft
of the ordinance and get it ready for adoption. We have concluded that we should
not make any changes in the zones until we have first adopted the ordinance setting
up the basic authority and procedure for establishing specific zones and classi-
fications of uses therein; hence, presently existing uses under presently existing
zones will not be disturbed, changed or modified without appropriate proceedings
therefor after the adoption of the basic ordinance.
Before the final adoption of the ordinance, there will be a further
hearing or hearings so that you will have an opportunity to present any objections
thereto that you may have. You will be notified by a published notice of the time
and place of such hearing or hearings.
;;,:~,"..-4-""~",,,,;,,,,,;;,.-^_,,,,^,~'..__..__~.,,i..,'''iiliii'''''.,._",,;.,.<,"~
-<~ I
1
3251
City Hall, Anaheim. California - March 18,1959 - 7:00 P.M.
The City Clerk reported that a letter had been filed requesting
hearing this evening from residents residing on Yale Avenue, and inasmuch
as there is an action pending in this vicinity, it was probable that this
request refers to Reclassification No. F-58-59-66 submitted by Central
Baptist Church and on which public hearing has been scheduled by the City
Council to be held April 14, 1959, 7:00 P.M. That this announcement is made
because some interested person might be present in the audience thinking
that this could be considered this eveninga
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council regarding
the ordinance.
Mr. Mary Starr, 855 North West Street, addressed the Council,
advising of a meeting she had attended with a group of young women, new
home owners in our city, and as result of the meeting, filed a statement
of points to consid~r in the new comprehensive zoning ordinance proposed
for Anaheim, regarding their support of 1225 square foot minimum h~)Use areas
and 7200 square foot minimum lot areas, and also urging that no two story
multiple dwelling be built within 150 feet of an R-A, R-S or R-l zone, and
that the developers of property zoned for multiple family use assume the
responsibility of erecting a suitable six foot masonry wall along the pro-
perty line separating his property from adjoining properties zoned for
single family residences; further, supporting the requirement of commercial
establishments to provide six to ten feet of landscaping; and in conclusion,
urging the City Council to notify property owners within 300 feet of property
considered for rezoninga
At the conclusion of the statement made by Mrs. Starr, a large
delegation came forward in support of this statement, giving their names and
addresses to the City Councila
Mro Jo Eo Jardine, 807 Agate Street, Member of the Board of
Directors of the Sherwood Forest Civic Association and appearing on behalf
of their Presiden~ Mra Homer A. LaMont, addressed the Council, and read a
letter which had been previously filed with the City Council, requesting that
the area bounded on the west by Brookhurst Street, on the east by Loara Street,
on the north by Lincoln Boulevard, and on the south by Ball Road, be considered
for R-l C zoning instead of R-l D.
Mro Carl Ames, 635 Adria, representing the Anaheim Village Ilomefair
Civic Association, addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed M-l
zoning of the area bounded on the north by Lincoln Avenue, on the east by the
railroad tracks, on the west by Loara Street, and bisected on the south by
Broadway.
Mra Ames was advised that his remarks and information would be con-
sidered when the City Council considers that particular section of the City.
Mr. Jack Wood, Member of the Board of Trustees of the Magnolia
School District, addressed the Council, advising that he did not speak for
the Board of Trustees, however, he did speak for the people in the community,
and requested that the 7200 square foot lot area be maintained, and explained
his reasons therefor by reporting and comparing statistically, in relation to
taxation and revenue received for education, the estimated number of elementary
and high school students in a 7200 square foot lot area subdivision as compared
to those in a 6000 square foot lot area subdivision.
Mr. Dave Collins addressed the Council and presented and read a
report of the Anaheim Board of Realtors relating to the proposed new com-
prehensive zoning ordinance. He further advised, that, in his opinion, there
should be created an additional zone allowing for smaller sized houses.
Mrs. AlbeE Kluthe asked if the Council would be considering tonight
the various petitions submitted concerning zoning.
Mr. Murdoch answered that the Council, after looking at the job
before them, has determined that the best way to handle the consideration of
the ordinance, is to split it into two parts, the first part in the wording
of the ordinance itself, the second part in the zoning maps, so that zoning
of specific parcels would not be taken care of at this time, not until after
"""""'..,.........".,."'_~-."_~,_,,.,,~._.',_~.'ij.,"'.~;......_.......~~.."-'.'Q.=.~,..."....~.,,""...,"".,_"""*"""".....~o!~,_."'"
3252
City Hall, Anaheim, California - March 18, 1959 - 7;00 P.M.
the adoption or introduction of the wording of the ordinance. He further explained
that part of the reason that guided the Council in splitting the two parts of the
ordinance, the map and the balance of the ordinance, was, that as of this time, no
map shoving the proposed zoning has been published and that there are many people
who have not had an opportunity to see the zoning map as is now posted on the east
wall of the Council Chambers. The intention is, by considering the specific zoning
area by area, it will give the City an opportunity to publish the proposed zoning
of that area in map form so that all who are interested in a particular area have a ~~-
chance to see that proposed zoning before the hearing. It was felt that a much more
thorough job could be done through this method.
Mro Joe Kopsho addressed the Council and asked if the ordinance did not
have to be adopted by the City Council within 40 days from the first public hearing.
MrQ Turner explained that the present ordinance does contain such a pro-
vision, however, those sections have been repealed in order to give the Council
more time in which to consider this ordinance. Mr" Turner further explained that
the State law has a 40 day provision that applies to the Planning Commission, but
the State law 40 day rule does not apply to the City Council.
Mr. Murdoch advised that we would endeavor to publish the map of the
area to be considered by the City Council at least 10 days before the h~aring
thereon.
Mro Halvorsen addressed the Council regarding off-street parking, which,
in his opinion, the Broadway Shopping Center was an excellent example. He stated
that the dimension of the lanes, that is from post to post, was 43 feet 9 inches;
that the widths at right angles of the parking spaces were st feet; that the
stalls were at a 45 degree angle.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. There
was no response"
-
Councilman Pearson moved that the public hearing be closed. Councilman
Fry seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pearson amended his motion to more clearly explain the in-
tention of the City Council; that the part of the public hearing be closed that
has to do with the pri.nted text of the ordinance. Councilman Fry seconded the
motion~ MOTION CARRIED.
CITY OF FULLERTON ~ EXCAVATION PERMIT: Request of the City of Fullerton for
excavation permit to allow for the installation of a 24 inch pipeline in Bywood
and Citron Streets (Tract No" 2401) to connect from their main plant in Anaheim
to the Riverside Freeway, was submitted.
Said request was explained and recommended by Mr. Turner.
On motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Pearson, the Public
Works Director was authorized to issue to the City of Fullerton an excavation permit
or whatever permit is needed, to do the construction as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
KATELLA PARK ANNEXATION: RESOLUTION NO. 5107: Councilman Pearson offered Resolution
No. 5107 and moved for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF
COpy OF. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRqULATE A PETITION RELATING TO THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THEREOF, AND APPROVING
THE CIRCULATION OF SAID PETITION.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES:
NO ES ;
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Fry, Pearson and Schutte"
Nooe.
Bo~den and Coons.
'*"'.......,.;.",,~--,.,""':"'''.!;''''.:,t\)i,{.,:J.:.:c,.,-*+~~H...:;;:.:.:'. ,
",*,"",."_'Jj . _.AIIIIA~
3253
City Hall, Anaheim. California - March 18. 1959 - 7:00 P.Mo
The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Pearson moved to adjourno Councilman Fry seconded the
rnotiono MOTION CARRIED.
ADJ.OURNE~OO P.M.)
SIGNED:. ~~/..L",:'...~
City Clerk
City Hall. Anaheim. California - March 24. 1959 - 7:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT;
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Borden, Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams
CITY ENGINEER: Thornton Piersall
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Robert W. Mungall
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of the regular meeting held March la, 1959 and adjourned
regular meetings held March 11th, 17th and 18th, 1959, were approved, on
motion by Councilman Pearson, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 5108: Councilman Borden offered Resolution No. 5108 and moved
for its passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book, page
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING
THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MARCH 24, 1959. ($314,026.95)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Borden, Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted.
~CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-58-59-58: Submitted by
Eva Stefania Bielanski, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l on the
front 100 feet of property located at 2760 Crescent Avenue, and tequesting
the balance of the parcel to be rezoned from R-A to R-3 (south side of
Crescent Avenue, east of Dale Avenue).
The City Planning Commission, pursuant tO,their Resolution No. 169,
Series 1958-59, forwarded said reclassification to the City Council without
recommendation, but if granted by the City Council that it be subject to:
1. That a subdivision map be filed.
2~ That street improvement plans for Crescent Avenue be prepared
and all improvements installed in accordance with standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
3. Dedication of 32 feet on Crescent Avenue to the City of Anaheim.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes.
5. That some unit of payment for the multiple family residential
'~":;",*"',::,,,,,,,,.*c~;,:,:,,,,:,,,,,,,,_~c;:,,,,,,':".:,,,;...;.t.~~.~.:~..,t,~~ji~~.-..:::."_~.,,,--,",",~:,.:,.....,_-'tC.....,,,_,,,,,.~'""~~~~~