The URL can be used to link to this page

1968/09/17 68...5:.5 II., HlNU'IES - Se tember 10 ; 30 '.M. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein Resolution No. 68R-560 duly passed and adopted. DI Application filed by Jack A. Notery, for permit to t Nino's Steak House, 2916 West Lincoln Avenue, was ~ subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim ommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Council- y Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. EN T EN DANCE: The City' Clerk read corres- er 4, 196 , from Larry Sierk, Executive Vice-President ~ of Commerce, requesting permission to conduct a Hal- ~he Anaheim Convention Center Arena, on October 31, Councilman .!utton moved that the contract proposed by the Chamber of Commerce for use . the Convention Center Arena include the rental amount according to the fee' chedu1e, and the City pay to the Chamber of Commerce that amount for coma ity part~cipation in the Halloween Festival, as it is a community event. ~uncilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROIOSED ORDINANCE - AP Pebley requested th~ consideration, autho mittee, as recommend Citizens Capital Imp THENT OF CULTURAL COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE: Mayor jthe City Attorney prepare an ordinance for Council ~Zing the appointment of a CUlt. ural Commission or Com- by the Recreation and Cultural Arts Committee of the vements Committee. HA R BOULEVARD PARKING i progress report on t Harbor Boulevard, au STRICTION - PROGiESS REPORT: The Mayor request" a street widening project and parking restrictions on orized by the City Council on March 1, 1966. D..'.............., ~ ; -- The City A torney indicated that a "No Parking" Ordinance canaot be prepared until a tscription of the locations to be restricted is deter- mined. The City E tineer reported right-of-way has been acquired on more than half of the ind Vidual parcels involved, and that there are two areas for which sufficient aedication has been made to begin street widening, which he expects will comm ~ce at the end of this year. Mr. Murdoc i suggested that an ordinance be prepared which would not penalize the pro ~rty owners who have made the necessary dedication, but are in an area ~re the total dedication is below the level necessary for street widening. 'The City Council concurred. ST E OF CALIFORNIA - H Attorney, Councilma of the City of Anahe ards for health and visions of Division fornia: H AND SAFETY CODES: On the recommendation of the City , lark moved that it be the finding of the City Council ~ that City ordinances which prescribe minimum stand- t1fety are equal to or greater than the following pro- 3 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Cali- Part 1.5 (Comm Chapter 1 (Co Chapter 2 (Co ing with Section 17910) cing with Section 19000) of Part 3 cing with Section 19100) of Part 3 0.:.-.,'.' _' - t! ,- II - MOTION CARRIED. PRQIOSED CITY HALL: Cou the City of Anaheim Hall was built in I for the year 1980 i need which exists, sional studies nece tion for the propos .lman Dutton cited statistics of population growth in , d called attention to the fact that the present City b, to accommodate 50 employees; and the projections .icated a need to house 500 employees. In view of the suggested that the City Council authorize the profes- ~ry to determine space requirements and the best loca- new City Hall. He suggested engaging the services 68 - 547 C1t California - CO 1968 1:30 P.M. of an expert in civic center de Jgn to coQduct the suggested study, with the understanding that no intervent on would be allowed on the part of Cityoffi- cia1s regarding the final site election. Councilman Schutte su tested meeting with the Board of Trustees of"' the Anaheim Union High School D $trict, before authorizing a professional study, and also suggested ho1di t over further discussion of the matter un- til it could be considered by t e full Council, to which all Councilmen agreed. ~OURNMENT: motion. Councilman Clark moved to adjourn. Jl)TION CARRIED. Councilman Schutte seconded the o ADJOURNED: 6: 10 P. M. SIGNED eim California - C The City Council of le City of Anaheim met in regular session. 1.30 P.M. . COUNCILMEN: Dutton, $chutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: Krein CITY MANAGER: Keith.'. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAG : Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Jose. Geisler CITY ENGINEER: Jame P. Maddox CITY CLERK: Dene M. 'i11iams ZONING SUPERVISOR: +nald Thompson PRESDT: ABSENT: PRESE1fI': Dr.:............. , l Mayor Pebley called le meeting to order. INVOCATION: Chaplain Bevan, 0 the Anaheim Memorial Hospital, gave the In- vocation. ' FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutto led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMAtIONS: The following roc1amations were issued by Mayor Pebley: "Constitution Week" September 17 to 23, 1968. "Clare VanHoorebeke .nday" - September 22, 1968. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim Ci 1 Council meeting held September 3, 1968, were n =~:~' on motion by Council n Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark. H>TION l_,. VAIVER OF ING - ORDINANCES AND SOLUTIONS- Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ord ances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereb given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific req est is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or reso1utio. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Cit Hall Anaheim Cali ~ NUll) PUBLIC DARING T tI). 1042; Subm:ltt R-A to e-l, request1 with kitchen facilit located on the south 68-548 er 17 1968 1- 30 .K. in the approved. LASSIF' CATION . 68-69-9 AND CONDITIONAL E by Fred C. Brandt, requesting a change in zone from permission to establish a l55-unit, three-story motel s and waiver of maximum building height. Property ide of Lincoln Avenue, west of Magnolia Avenue. Public he. tn8 was continued from the meeting of September 3, 1968, to this date. The City :r 1968~ recommended ti ably consider the s~ " :j 1. That t Anaheim a strip of 1 and the westerly 20 c1uding alley cutoff 2. That 9 all engineering req~ and for the alleys, grading and paving, completed as require plans and specificatt a bond in an amount posted with the City ments. 3. That t of Anaheim, and reco revocable Offer of D ins alley cut-offs, line in locations de cepted at such time 4. That t Anaheim the sum of $ lighting purposes. 5. That Anaheim the sum of purposes. 6. That i corner, an easement the property owner t 7 . Tha t C shall be complied wi such further time as ,J tions if n " .~ ~ii! f r ,,'"',j~ I . Tha t t pletion of Rec1assif 2 . Tha t t approved plans on fi 3. That f. mined to be necessar 4 . Tha t a east, and south pro factory to the City installation of the 5. That shielded from view, homes. 6. mum 6-feet in height, protect the integrit 7 . Tha t C complied with prior t , j t'nning Commission, at their meeting held September 11, " following conditions, should the City Council favor- ect reclassification: ; t' owners of subject pr,opertY shall deed to the City of d 20 feet in width along the southerly property line et of the easterly 40 feet for alley purposes and in- teet and alley improvement plans shall be prepared and ;ements of the City of Anaheim, along Lincoln Avenue ch as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street and alley ainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be iby the City Engineer and in accordance with stand.rd ~ns on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that *d form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be to guarantee the installation of said engineering require- owners of subjecL property shall provide to the City ed in the office of the Orange County Recorder, an It- ication for two alleys, 20 feet in width and inc1ud~ . tending westerly 20 feet from the easterly property .rmined by the City Engineer; and the dedication be ac- ~ the City deems it necessary. ~ owners of subject property shall pay to the City of 400 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for street :~,~~~:.; ........ ~ owners of subject propeJ;ty shall pay to the Cit'Yof' d per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for tree planting !the subject property is graded to drain southwesterly . letter accepting the drainage shall be obtained from Ithe west. ddition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or ~he City Council may grant. nning Commission also recommended the following condi- tional use permit is approved: s conditional use permit is granted subject to the com- tion No. 68-69-9. 'sh storage areas shall be provided in accordance With with the office of the Director of Public Works. e hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- ~y the C~~af of the Fire D~partment. ,-foot masOnry wall shall be constructed along the west, ty lines, and that a bond in an amount and form satis- . Anaheim may be posted with the City to guarantee the onry wall along the east property line. air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential ing areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maxi- and shall be directed away from the property lines to pf the area. ition Nos. 2,3,4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be final building and zoning inspections. 6e-549 Cit Hall An im California - CO 17 1968 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor, 1\0 1d Thomps!on, noted the location of the subject property and briefed the evide e submitted to and considered by the City Plann- ing Commission at their meeting held September ll, 1968, noting the recommenda- tion that the problem of traffi circulation be reexamined and consideration given to requiri~g a street. A proval of 100% kitchen facilities was felt to be an encouragement for sub-sta dard apartment units. He reported that the ~titionerhas submitted revised plans incor- porating a 20-foot alley, near he east property line, which would provide secondary access to other parce ~ in the ~ea, in accordance with Exhibit "A" on the east Council Chamber wall. He noted that the revised plans show an open parking area between th alley and the easterly boundary. Through an irrevocable offer of dedication access to the Magnolia Avenue properties would be established at the ti . those properties are developed, at whatever points are most advantageous. e noted that the entire alley would be de- veloped on the subject property as well as the alley along the southern boun- dary, which would eventually pr vide access to Stinson Street. Exhibit liB", which de Lcted a street connecting Lincoln Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, was recommende by the City Planning Commission as the best means of providing circulation, due to the number and size of the parcels involved. Council discussion en ped, regarding the desirability of a public alley being located next to an pen parking strip, and felt that considerable congestion would occur when the hext Magnolia properties developed, if this plan is adopted. Revised plans were reviewed by the Council. cil. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City Coun- Mr. Dale L. Ingram, A ~horized Agent for the petitioners, reported the results of meetings held wi f1 the owne:rs of adjoining parcels, the City Engineer, and the Planning Staf. The alley circulation, provided in the re- vised plans, was the most agree ~le plan to everyone involved, as it did not require reimbursement for dedic tion or construction of the alley. When the Magnolia properties are develop d, owners will reimburse the cost of relocat- ing the parking stalls to provi e the necessary access. Discussion continued, the alley, as opposed to a stre would handle a capacity equal t that a public alley situated as not be adequate to allow proper perties are fully developed, an equipment. concerning the traffic-carrying capacity of t; and the City Engineer stated that the alley a street. The consensus of the Council was proposed, with open parking on one side, would circulation of traffic when the adjoining pro- may not provide adequate access for emergency Mr. Thompson noted th t each parcel could be developed independently, with separate means of ingress nd egress; however, the City Planning Commis- sion felt that the Magnolia pro erties could be better served by a connecting alley pattern or development of a street. Mr. Ingram pointed ou that the original application proposed a 26- foot driveway the full depth of the property, which would provide more than adequate traffic circulation. Mr. James Hollenbeck, location of his property on Ma of the cost of development of t provide his own vehicular acces cated that consideration of his determination of the subject re in that his escrow is running 0 610 East Buffalo, Santa Ana, indicated the ~lia Avenue, and objected to paying a share e proposed alley, stating that he wished to when his property is developed. He indi- toning application is being delayed, pending lassification, which has created a hardship, t and action is necessary soon. The City Manager ques ioned how the problem of drainage would be handled if the Magnolia propert es were developed independent1y~ since the property drains in a southwest ly direction. o n n Cit Hall Anaheim Calif means of Mr. 0.5. S to dedicate for an a1 velop in conjunction cognized that drainag ~"j::,"", I'" t c ~ Betty Pagel City Council, in beha of the subject proper ver of height limitat development has an OY provide for a 26-foot the revised plans wou tion, thereby orienti ty. Mayor Peb1e to solve the drainag~ pointed out that the supply the necessary Council; and question 68-550 IL MINUTES · Se tember 17 1968 1- 30 P. H. tk suggested that drainage could be accomplished by ~f necessary. ~h, 124 South Magnolia, stated that he did not wish ty on the south property line, since he plans to d,e- th the property owner to the north; however, he re- I could be facilitated by the development of. an alley. ! Ii Real Estate Broker, 2135 West Hiaw, a,tha, addressed the of Mr. Notaro, who owns the property directly east . She asked for clarification of t~e requested wai- n, and wa.s advised by Mr. Ingram that the proposed '-all height of three stories; that the original plans rive which would abut her client's property, however, require the development to face the opposite direc- . the back of the building toward her client's proper- II sugges ted further continuation of the PUb,liC hearing, roblem to the benefit of all concerned; Mr. Hollenbeck ley circulation plan proposed in Exhibit "A" would ainage, but did not meet with the approval of the City whether an alternate solution is available. Mr. Thompso jdrew a diagram of an alternate discussed by th~ Plann- ing Staff, which pro ~sed a cul-de-sac street, the centerline of which would extend approximately ,o-thirds of the length of the eastern boundary of the subject property from :f..incoln Avenue, with an alley extending from the end of the cul-de-sac to the *outh property line, and continuing westerly across the southern boundary of ~bject property. ~ ~'" Mr. Ingram f'inted out that the cu1~de-sac street would require dedication along the ster1y boundary of a small, narrow parcel fronting on Lincoln Avenue, and f ,t that the owner would object to this alternate. Council dis ~ssion again ensued, regarding the possibility of con- tinuation to solve th jproblems of vehicular access and drainage common to the undeveloped parce . in the area, and Mr. Hollenbeck pointed out that the only alternate agreea ~e to the property owners was not acceptable to the Council; therefore, f tther continuation would probably be of no value. Mr. Ingram ~ated that his client is agreeable to the alleys cir- culation plan shown i .Exhibit "A", but would not agree to the dedication and development of th 30-foot, half-width street on the property. Councilman "A", be employed to s culation to the Magno ing to pay for only t thutte suggested the alley plan, as shown in Exhibit tve the drainage problem, with no through traffic cir- la properties; Mr. Smith stated that he would be wi11- ~ drainage facilities, if that alternate is approved. Mr. Hollenb fk indicated that he would be willing to pay one-half of the cost of the de ~lopment of an alley, if that a1ternat~ is adopted. The Mayor a ~ounced that sufficient evidence from those present had been received, an 'declared the hearing closed. n . , ".# RESOLUTION NO. 68R-5 Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-561 for adoption, authori ng the preparation of the necessary ordinance chang- ing the zone as reque ~ed, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, _ending Condition No. 1 to read as follows: I. That th owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of la ~ 20 feet in width, along the southerly and easterly property lines for a1 ~y purposes, and including adequate alley cut-offs. Refer to Re ~lution Book. 68-551 Cit Hall ADah im California - CO L MINUTES - Se tember 17 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL C>F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES F CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-9 - C-l.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: mES: ABIENT: COUNCILMEN: Du COUNCILMEN: No COUNCILMEN: Kr The Mayor declares Res Schutte, Clark and Pebley o 68R-561 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-562: Council n Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-562 for adoption, Iranting Conditional U ~ Permit Nb. 1042, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, and adding Condition No.8, as follows: 8. That subject prope ty shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with aevised Plans and spec tications, to be approved by the City Council, providing kitchen efficiency uni ~ with a maximum of 6-cubic foot refrigerator, 2-burner stove, and sing1e-compa ~ment sink, and excluding oven or baking fa- cilities, with the exception of be Manager's uni,t, in which full kitchen fa- cilities will be allowed. Refer to Resolution Bo k. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1042. Roll Call Vote: AYES: ROES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: CO UNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared CQlTINUED PUlLI HEARINGS - CONDITIO Public hearing on the following tinued from the meeting of Septe Authorized Agent for the petitio Schutte, Clark and Pebley n No. 68R-562 duly passed and adopted. T NOS. 1046 1047 1048 AND 1049: nditiona1 use permit applications was con- 1968, at the request of R.F. Reid, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1046: Submitted by Henry Wagner, requesting per- mission to replace an existing b llboard, with waiver of maximum permitted display area, M-1 zoned property located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and State College Boulevard The City Planning Co ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-2l1, denied said conditional use per t. Appeal from action taken was filed by Foster & Kleiser, and public hea ing scheduled this date. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1047: permission to replace an existin display area, C-2 zoned property north of Lincoln Avenue. Submitted by Mosabura Nakamura, requesting billboard with waiver of maximum permitted located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue, The City Planning 8sion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68~209, denied said conditional use per t. Appeal from action taken was filed by Foster & K1eiser, and public hea ing scheduled this date. n CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1048. Submitted by Anaheim Union Water Company, requesting permission to replace an existing billboard with waiver of maximum permitted display area, M-l zone property, located on the east side of State College Boulevard, south of Ora ethorpe Avenue. Ci ..P.K. 68-552 -co L KIIftJ'l'IS - Be tember l7 denied Foster i'anning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-212, al use permit. Appeal from action taken was filed by , public hearing scheduled this date. ~ tj CONDITIONAL USE P permission to rep1. mitted display are. cated on the east $ T NO. 1049: Submitted by Howard P. House, requesting an existing billboard with waivers of maximum per- nd maximum permitted height, C-1 zoned property, 10- e of Magnolia Avenue, north side of Broadway. The City denied said conditi Foster cSt K1eiser, . tanning Co~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-210, al use permit. Appeal from action taken was filed by public hearing scheduled this date. +n noted the locations of SUbj, ect properties, and briefed fd to and considered by the City Planning Commission, !freeway-orientated signs have been removed in accord- ~63 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which also provides ,s of up to 300-square feet in size in certain locations i signs exceeding the maximum size require a coad1tion- !may be approved in instances where unique circumstances ,ning Commission recommended denial of the subject con- 'on the basis that an unique situation did not exist; .ut that the qualifying term 1s not defined in the Code. Mr. Thom. the evidence submit noting that 42 or 4 ance with Chapter 1 for placement of si as a matter of rigb al use permit, whiC exist. The City P1 ditiona1 use permit however, he pointed Mayor PeD .y asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Don P. Da ~s, 120 East Ocean Avenue, Long Beach, repreaentina all of the petitioners, ;ddressed the Council and requested that the applica- tions be granted, i Iview of the loss of the freeway locations. 1 The City ing the application posed locations; if major arteries and judged to be an aes val should not be 0 ~torney advised that the proper criterion in consider- ;is the suitability of the size of the signs to the pro- the proposed locations are in the concept area of two .use no problem to surrounding properties and are not .etic nuisance, approval is warranted, and that appro- ithe basis of removal of the freeway-orientated signs. Plans wer reviewed by the City Council and the Mayor a.:ked if anyone wished to sp *k in opposition to the subject applications. There was no response. Mr. Rober 'F. Reid, of Foster cSt K1eiser, advised the Council that an advertising sign ~s automatically removed when the property on which it is located undergoe 1 development. He explained th~t the waivers of maximum permitted display a .as were requested to allow use of painted bulletins in these locations, ,thich differ from poster panels in that tgey are hand- painted signs, made in sections which can be disassembled and moved to other locations. H distributed illustrated brochures to the Councilmen. SOLUTION NO. 68R- for adoption, grant in three years. 3: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-563 g Conditional Use Permit No. 1046, subject to review Mayor Peb .y asked if anyone else wished to address the City Coun- cil; there being no tesponse, declared the hearing closed. :n.,'. ~ . .. t I Refer to ,solution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE' tITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING COlIDltIONAL USE PERMIT NO. I046 ' , Roll AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein Resolution No. 68R-563 duly passed and adopted. The Mayo.. 68-553 eim California - CO 1968 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTI9N NO. 68R-564.~ Counc. lman Schutte offered Resolution No.6 8R-564 for adoption, granting Conditi ~a1 Use Permit No. 1047, subject to review in three years. Refer to Resolution ~ok. A RESOLutION OF THE CITY COUNt t OF THE C[TY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1046. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Schutte, Clark and Pebley No. 68R-564 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTltN NO. 68R-565: Counc lman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-565 for adoption, granting Conditi ha1 Use Permit No. 1048, subject to review in three years. Refer to Resolution : ok. A RESOLutION OF THE CITY COUNC L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1048. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSBNT: co UNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Schutte, Clark and Pebley olution No. 68R-565 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-566: Coun.lman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-566 for adoption, granting Condit. 'a1 Use Permit No. 1049, subject to review in three years. Refer to Resolution A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO USE PERMIT NO. 1049. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION by Ephraim Beard, et aI, requ waivers of permitted uses as (new and used), including all permit the existing operation parts, sales and storage}; pr on the west side of Beach Bou parcels of land. L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL Schutte, Clark and Pebley No. 68R-566 duly passed and adopted. . 68-69-1 AND VARIANCE NO. 2001: Submitted ~ting a change in zone from R-A to C-I, and llows: Parcel A - Permit an automobile agency, servicing incidental thereto; a~d Parcel B - of an auto salvage yard, (used autos and auto perty described as 4.7 acres of land, located evaI'd, south of Ball Road, comprised of two The City Planning C ~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-239, recommended approval of said eclassification, subject to the fo~lowing con- ditions: I. That street imp ovement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements of the Ci y of Anaheim along Beach Boulevard, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, stree grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall . completed as required by the City Engineer o o n 61-554 IL MI.NtrrlS - Se telDber 17 .M. ~'.',.,.":,, 1 :, I ;; f ' '", and in accordance w! fice of the City Inl tory to the City of installation of said 2. That t Anaheim the sum of $ lighting purposes. 3. That Anaheim the sum of ing purposes. 4. That t approved plans on ft 5. That f mined to be necessar 6 . Tha t a perly shielded from residential homes. 7 . Tha t p mum 6-feet in heigh4 protect the residen~ B . Tha t 4 ter1y 118 feet of th 9 . Tha t C complied with within further time as the 10. That C shall be complied wi , , ;' standard, plans and specifications on file in the of- eer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfac- ahelm shall be posted with the City to guarantee the fngineering requirements. + owners of subject property shall pay to the City of ~OO per front foot along Beach Boulevard, for street subject property shall pay to the City of foot along Beach Boulevard, for tree p1ant- ~Sh storage areas shall be provided in accordance with with the office of the Director of Public Works. e hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- !by the Chief of the Fire Department. 1 air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- ~ew, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent ! jking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a ..xi~ nd shall be directed away from the property lines to 1 integrity of the area. -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the wes- 'north property line. 4dition Nos. I, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be ~ period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such ~ty Council may grant. 4dition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned, ~ prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City P Resolution No. PC68- nning Commission granted said variance, pursuant to to the following conditions: J:,,:"',," (.i' :a 1. That ~s variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. ;69-11. 2. That a ~ wrecked vehicles stored on Parcel "B" shall be stacked no higher than para1 '1 with the top of the 8-foot fence. Mr. Thomps isting uses and zoni mitted to and consid noted the location of the subject property, the ex- in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence sub- ,ed by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Peb1 the City Planning C plied affirmatively. asked if the applicant was present and concurred with ,ission's recommendations; to which the applicant re- The Mayor the subject rec1assi closed. n asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to ation; there being no response, declared the hearing RESOLUTION NO. 68R- for adoption, author the zone as requeste Planning Commission. Councilman ;)utton offered Resolution No. 68&-567 ng the preparation of necessary ordinance changing subject to the conditions recommended by the City Refer '1,,' .' , ,) A RESOLUTION OF THE MINING THAT TITLE 18 BE AMENDED AND THAT (:3-:J-11 - C-1.) Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DITIR- THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BOUNDAI.IES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE Cr-:ANGED. Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Resolution No. 68R-567 duly passed and adopted. 68-555 Cit California - I: 30 P.M. RESOLUT\ON NO. 68R-568: Coun 11man Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-568 for adoption, granting Varian e No. 2001_ subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning C~ission. Refer to A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN 1L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2001. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: o ~utton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley .one irein No. 68R-568 duly passed and adopted. The Mayor declared PUBLIC HEARl - RECLASSIFICATION . 68-69-1: Submitted by Francis L. and WreathaL. Ricker, requesting change ih zone from R-1 to C-1, property located at the northwest corn * of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street, and furtber described as 2453 and t459 East Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning C ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-24S, recommended said rec1assifica ton be disapproved. Mr. Thompson noted presently occupied by two R-1 mediate area, and briefed the City Planning Commission. Re fact that no land use change that the subject properties a should remain so; that commer on the residential integrity quests for commercial strip z recent Front-On Study recomme Street and Lincoln Avenue be cial zoning had been approved because of its close proximit the Orange Freeway. .e location of the subject property, which is 10mes, the existing uses and zoning in the im- .vidence submitted to and considered by the ommendation for disapproval was based on the ad taken place to warrant Commercial zoning; e substantially residential in nature, and tal zoning would have a deleterious effect f the neighborhood, and would precipitate re- aing in the area. He further noted that the .ed that the properties fronting on Sunkist etained for residential use; and that commer- for the northeast corner of that intersection to the terminus of the proposed off-ramp of n The City Council re iewed maps of the area, and the Mayor asked if the applicant wished to addre . the City Council. Mr~ Francis L. Rick application was submitted on able for residential use; tha creased traffic at the inters that it is no longer safe to that a "No Parking" zone now perty, and that it is extreme necessitates backing out into r, 2459 East Lincoln Avenue, stated that his he basis that the property is no longer suit- the noise and vibrations caused by the in- ction has risen to an intolerable level; and ark his car on the street. He pointed out xists on all but a small portion of his pro- f hazardous for him to use his garage, as it traffic approaching the intersection. He stated that the rea had changed considerably in the nine or ten years he has lived there, and that his neighbors on Lincoln Avenue ap- prove of his request for co tcial zoning. He submitted a list bearing twelve names in support of th proposed reclassification. The Mayor asked subjec~ reclassification. Mr. Warren Treadway resenting a group of 30 neigh tion. He stated that the ho rezoned at this time; that ma provements, and the majority property. He called attentio before 1980, and also indicat property is developed commerc subject property has only one n tlyone wished to speak in opposition to the 142 Paradise Lane, addressed the Council, rep- ors who objected to the proposed reclassifica- s in the area were too new and valuable to be y of the home owners have made expensive im- re opposed to commercial zoning of the subject to deed restrictions which prohibit such use d that parking would still be a problem if the ally, noting that the alley to the rear of the Ileans of access. Ci .H. 68-556 a.ll lL 5 - 5 t mber l7 Mr. Ash1e stating that he con ricts in the City; the vicinity exceed problem if the prop low depth of the 10 premature, and that IKnight, 2416 Paradise Road, also spoke in opposition, dered the area to be one of the best residential dist- t the supply of undeveloped commercial property in the demand; and that parking would continue to be a ty is developed for commercial use, due to the shal- He felt that the request for commercial zoning is e homes could be rented as residences. Mr. Bill op1n10n, the inters the request is war ver, a shopping center developer, stated that in his tion was definitely commercial in character, and felt ed in view of the heavy traffic. Mr. R.L. ques ted zone change" property on Lincoln found it necessary he had made several since rented the res He pointed out that on Lincoln Avenue t Lincoln Avenue appr Street has been app zoning is indicated that he wished to a ter, 311 Lon~o~ Place, spoke in support of the re- tating that he occupied a home close to the subject enue for approximately one and one-half years, aDd move because of the excessive noise and dust; that successful attempts to sell the property, and has ence and is experiencing a high turnover in tenancy. e proposed freeway offramp would increase traffic an even greater level, and noted that a parcel on '.mate1y 1,200 feet from the intersection of Sunkist ed for commercial zoning (C-O.) He felt commercial r those homes fronting on Lincoln Avenue, and stated y for reclassification of his property for commercial use. n , -:,; In rebutta dentia1 property in in the course of ma further noted that h to the west of the s the other residences ~' MI. Ricker commented that many of the owners of resi- e area had violated the deed restrictions themselves g alterations and improvements to their property. He 1 intends to reside on the property located immediately pject parcels, thereby providing a buffer zone for to the ~gain addressed the Council, specifically objecting ~y being considered as a service station site. The Mayor had been presented, ~nounced that a good cross section of the evidence ~d declared the hearing closed. i Councilmen would eventually be use; however, in the plication for rezoni t1ark and Dutton stated that they felt the property re suitable for commercial rather than residential ~bsence of specific plans for development, felt ap- . at this time was premature. RESOLUTION: Council ing Reclassification plans for developmen n Clark offered a resolution for adoption disapprov- o. 68-69-15 without prejudice, on the basis that 110 were submitted. Following going resolution and subject rec1assifica plicant an opportuni man Dutton seconded tunci1 discussion, Councilman Clark withdrew the fore- ,oved to re-open and continue public hearing on the ~on to December 17, 1968, 1:30 P.M., to allow theap- t to submit specific plans for development. . Counci1- ~e motion. MOTION CARRIED. FUB IC HEARING - RECLASS Carl H. Lindgren, et waivers of maximum b location of accessor a standard street, t Property briefly des south of Ball Road, CATION 68-69-16 AID VAlIAlaE NO. 2002. Submitted by 1, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, and 1ding height, minimum distance between buildings, !bui1dings, and maximum distance of living units from ,establish a 101-unit, two-story apartment complex. tibed as located on the west side of Nutwood Street, .ntaining approximately 3.6 acres. n The City P.nning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68- 246, recommended sai !rec1assification, subject to the following conditions: 68-557 l:JO P.M. California 1. That street impro eering re.uirements of the City curbs and gutters, sidewalks, s or other appurtenant work shall eer; and that a bond in an amou shall be posted with the City t ing requirements. 2. That the owner Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per lighting purposes. 3. That the Anaheim the sum of 15C ing purp08es. 4. That the Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per tion purposes, said amount to sued. 5. That Condition N plied with within a period of I time as the Commission or City ~ment plans shall be prepared and all engin- bf Anaheim along Nutwood Street, such as reet grading and paving, drainage facilities, be completed as required by the City Engin- t and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim guarantee the installation of said engineer- property shall pay to the City of along Nutwood Street, for street ~ubject p~operty shall pay to the City of foot along Nutwood Street, for tree p1ant- ~ubject property shall pay to the City of 11ing unit, to be used for park and recrea- ; paid at the time the Building Permit is is- !. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- days from the date hereof, or such further unci1 may grant. The City Planning Co granted in part Variance No. 2 of 150 feet from R-1 and R-A,( to the following conditions: .. ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-247, , denying waiver of maximum building height, ept the school site), to the east, subject 1. That this varian classification No. 68-69-16. 2. That trash stora approved plans on file with t 3. That fire hydran mined to be necessary by the C 4. That any air-co shielded from view. 5. That Condition N plied with prior to final buil 6. That subject pro cordance with plans ans specif. marked Exhibit Nos. I, 2, 3, a struction shall be maintained school site) to the east. granted subject to the completion of Re- shall be provided in accordance with of the Director of Public Works. shall be installed as required and deter- f of the Fire Department. .tioning facilities proposed shall be properly n~,:,',.,,'. ;~'. I '" . 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be com- ng and zoning inspections. ,rty shall be developed substantially in ac- tions on file with the City of Anaheim, 4; provided, however, that one-story con- ithin 150 feet of the R-1 and R-A (except the Mr. Ronald Thompson zoning and use in the ilimediat City Planning Commission, Mr. were, in the opinion of the Co the developer to provide for g phery of the project. ted the location of subject property, the area. In summarizing the findings of the ompson reported that the waivers requested ission, technicalities, and necessary for eater open areas and a drive around the peri- Mr. Thompson reporte now proposed 99 units, with al perties on the east side of Nu struction. that revised plans were received today, and units wit~in 150 feet of single family pro- ood Street, designed for single-story con- Plans were reviewed y the City Council. Mr. William Phelps, plicants, explained the revise ing Commission's recommendatio requirements for parking, recr development would be an asset 14 East Katel1a Avenue, representing the ap- plans which now confiDD with the City P1ann- s. He reported the project exceeds the City's .tion and coverage and, in his opinion, the t this location. Mr. Robert Eckes, 18 opposition, submitting a petit signatures, representing appro the area, between Euclid Stree Avenue. 1 Castle Avenue, addressed the Council in On of protest, purportedly containing 502 imate1y $6,300,000.00 in property value in and Broadway, from Ball Road to Cerritos n Cit 1968 1.3QJ'.M. 68-558 rt_:__ .;,_~",..._', ~,j Mr. Eckes ~ain calle. attention to the zoning and uses surround- ing subject property land reported the estimated value of homes in the area range from $30,000.0 Ito $50,000.00. ; In noting ~e of the criteria used by the Planning Commission in determining this a p . per R-3 location, Mr. Eckes reported that the adjacent schools, the park a~the R-A property at the north classified this as an isolated area. He :eJther reported the similar conditions adjacent to his home, and stated th. lthey did not feel theyvere in an isolated area, and used all of the fact~ties of the area, such as schools, churches, parks and roads. ! Mr. Eckes in the area, and fe] to the area, noting project. mpared the density of the proposed project to the homes the apartment complex would add a minimum of 200 cars at only 127 parking stalls were to be provided for the Mr. Eckes stated that they, in single-family or low thereupon requested ad excerpts from the Staff Report, and in conclusion he area, would like to see the property deve1oped,as ensity, in keeping with the balance of the area, and at the applications be denied. Mr. Ted Ma ~, 1871 Chalet, circulator of one of the petitions of protest, reported th no one cQntacted refused to sign the petition, that the opposition was u nimous in this area. Mr. FoH. cil in opposition, South Nutwood Street, addressed the Conn- desire for a higher quality development. ~ Mrso Rober fEckes, 1867 Castle Avenue, advised of the probable parking problem whic ~ou1d be detrimental to their children, should the applications be gran 'd. Mr. Stan 0 as it presently is. created by the type ek, 1866 Castle Avenue, requested the property remain e alleged to problems observed which he felt were ~ people that live in large apartment complexes. Mr. Joe E Council as a home ow this meeting before 'rds, Attorney, 1930 Woodworth Avenue , addressed the r, advising that he had requested notification of e City Council, which notification was not received. Mr. Edward !stated that the type of development proposed would seriously impair the iroperty values in the area. pared ints of a planned residential development were com- proposed. Attention to accommodate incre s called to the necessity if improving Nutwood Street e in traffic, should the project be approved. Mr. Edward unavailable to them building should be i of variances or waiv their disappointment in that the plans were meeting. In his opinion, the design of the with Code provisions, without the necessity n l ",.Jj Mrs. E.T. 1878 Castle Avenue, advised that the Manion School, which occupi ,one of the residences on subject property designed for demolition shou1 Isubject apartment project be approved, was still in existence, and :fact a baby-sitting service. Mrs. Brown :tated if the proposed structure was in ac~ordancewith the homes, and renti 'from $l50.00 to $200.00 per month, it might be very nice for the area, b d at the rental they proposed, it could be nothing but a detriment. Discussion in the area, and in desirability of livi vantages of being c1 s held relative to the existing schools and churches ,swer t~ Councilman Schutte's question regarding the - next to a school, Mrs. Eckes noted some of the ad- to a school, and also noted that this fact was a 68-559 eim California 1968 1.30 P.M. selling point and carried in r al estate advertisements, and houses for sale in this area sell within a ver few days. Mrs. Erma Nicely, 19 Woodworth Road, reported that her main con- cern was the traffic that woul ~e generated by the apartment complex, there- by endangering the children in tlhe area. Brief discussion was of the tenants of the proposed indicate 129 garages and only Street), that this alone would eld relative to the probabte traffic pattern , artments, and Mr. Mah1 stated that the plans ,entrances out to a 40-foot street (Nutwood reate quite a problem, o Mr. Richard Brown, r of the proposed project, advis proceeding with plans of devel ing Commission found that this according to the City's defini sity," not "High Density." ,resenting Bayport Development, the developers , of their preliminary investigations prior to , ent; that both the City Staff and City P1ann- s an area adaptable for R-3 development; that ion, the project would be declared '~edium Den- Mr. Brown agreed tha ,the neighborhood was one to be proud of, and that the development they prop :ed was not intended, designed, nor never would become a shoddy development. In noting the appoin the smallest one-bedroom unit two-bath units would be 1,000 per month, for the one-bedroom would be walk-in closets, cent nts of tQe project, Mr. Brown reported that ld be 756 square feet; the two-bedroom, are feet; that rents would start at $140.00 nit, up to $200.00 per month; that there I air-conditioning, etc. Councilman Schutte a type, R-3 development. d if they had considered a one-story, garden- n Mr. Brown replied in the affirmative, and further stated that the economics of the situation pro ~ited all single-story construction, as it would be impossible to get su ~icient land coverage. Regarding the fear 0 plans, and noted that the desi parking anywhere except within attempt had been made to keep plained that the plans have be and that the only revision mad one-story. on-street parking, Mr. Brown referred to the of the project would not lend itself to e confines of the development; that every e project self-contained. He further ex- available for inspection for some time, was to change some of the two-story units to Councilman Schutte s the property developed as a ted that it would be his preference to have 1e-story, R-3 development. Councilman Dutton fe t two-story construction on subject property would be less objectionable at dhis location than many other locations, be- cause of the adjacent schools, ~urches, and parks, and that there would be less visual intrusion in this . stance than in most circumstances. Mrs. Carl Lindgren, dressed the Council advising t proximately 22 years, and owne mate1y 17 years. She related growth over the years, and in character of the area, Mrs. Li present signed the petition op of the owners of subject property, ad- t they have been residents of the City ap- and residents on Nutwood Street approxi- e of the changes experienced resulting from 1ating changes to the area, affecting the gren reported that a number of the people sing the City Park. n. Another concern expr protesting. Mrs. Lindgren fai ies of the area, as reported, ,sed was the size of the area covered by those to see how those on the perimeter boundar- uld be affected by the proposed development. Regarding the two ho reported that neither of the plex. s north of subject property, Mrs. Lindgren ers objected to the proposed apartment com- Ci ~!:!, :, ~ - - ; n,' tJ n 68-560 Anaheim tember l7 l.M. sented, y considered that sufficient evidence had been pre- declared the hearing closed. ~as held by the City Council, and Councilman Schutte ,inspection of the property should be made prior to felt that action. Counci111l81 could possibly be ~ families residing q property, of which property had school the north. utton was of the opinion that the only people who ected by the reclassification would be those twelve astle Avenue, immediately across from the subject was a party to the application. He noted that the n two sides, a park to the south, and commercial to Counci1m81 residents would not an R-2, 5,000 deve1 lark, being familiar with the area, felt that the ject to a garden-type apartment complex, or possibly ent. Council bedroom units, whi type, two-bedroom eb1ey noted that 60 of the proposed units we~e one- ou1d not attract people with children, and a garden- lex would bring more children to the area. At the c both resolutions Commission. lusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton offered ing the request, as recommended by the City P1aaning Prior to covered by the peti tions were signed b Key School; further, provisions, resu1ti 'te on the two resolutions, and in answer to the area of opposition,~s. Eckes advised that the petiti- parents of students attending the Francis Scott of the items they opposed was insufficient parking on-street parking. Council Code requirements, in his own apartmen Dutton noted that plans for off-street parking exceed Councilman Schutte advised that it was his experience komplex that none of the tenants parked on the street. could asked if in other areas of the City twelve families development. cations te on the foregoing resolutions approving the appli- City Planning Commission, was called for. AYES ~ NOES: ABSENT: Dutton Schutte, Clark and Pebley Krein ions failed to carry. Councilma continued to Octobe to one-story, garde tion. MOTION CARR! ~ebley moved that the public hearing be reopened, and ~2, 1968, 1:30 P.M., to allow redesign of the project : ype apartments. Councilman Schutte seconded the mo- Prior developer if he on the above motion, Councilman Pebley asked the the issue continued, or denied. Mr. Richa to accept the conti City Council the ar two-story portion 0 be made to redesign that they felt they had no choice but it appeared that it was agreed by the , was adaptable for R-3 development, and although the the project infringes on no one, every effort would ~e plans accordingly. It was ag d by the City Council that the revised plans be sub- mitted to the Interd artmental Committee for report, prior to the contin- ued date of the Pub1 ~ Hearing. 68-561 heim California - C 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARI - RECLASSIFICATION '. 68-69-17: Initiated by the City of Anaheim, to consider a change of zone f m R-A to C-l; property located on the south- west corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ball Road 0 The City Planning C ,ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-248, recommended said reclassificat On be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That the propose City of Anaheim a strip of 1a street along Magnolia Avenue, 2. That street impr eering requirements of the Cit curbs and gutters, sidewalks, or other appurtenant work shal and that a bond in an amount a be posted with the quirements. 3. That the propose owner of subject property shall pay to City of Anaheim the sum of $2. 0 per front foot along Magnolia Avenue, street lighting purposes. 4. That the propose City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ planting purposes. 5. That Condition N complied with within a period ther time as the City Council I owner of subject property shall deed to the , 53 feet in width from the centerline of the ~r street widening purposes. ~ement plans shall be prepared and all engin- of Anaheim along Magnolia Avenue, such as ~reet grading and paving, drainage facilities, be completed as required by the City Engineer; d form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall antee the installation of said engineering re- the for subject property shall pay to the foot along Magnolia Avenue, for tree s. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be f 180 days from the date hereof, or such fur- y grant. Mr. Thompson noted t e location of the subject property, which was formerly a well site, noted th existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Plann- ing Commission. Mr. Murdoch pointed ~t that tbe City of Anaheim is presently in the process of transfering a d ed to this property to Western Shopping Centers, Incorporated, and agreed to in tiate the petition for a change in zone to conform with the surrounding p reels. The City Attorney re ommended approval of the reclassification, providing the proposed owner b required to comply with Condition No.2 of the City Planning Commission's tecommendations. Mayor Pebley asked i there being no response, decla to address the City Council; closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-569: Counc lman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-569 for adoption, authorizing the teparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as recommended, subje t to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, amending bndition No. 2 to read as follows: 2. That the propose owner shall prepare street improvement plans and be responsible for all eng neering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Magnolia Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilitie . or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engine r; and that a bond in an amount and form satis- factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineeri g requirements. Refer to Resolution ook. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE HElM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDA IES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-17 - C-l.) o n n 68-562 Cit Hall Anaheim Cali NBTlS - Se tember 17 1968 l: 30 P.M. Roll Call tte: AYES: CO lLMIN: Dutton, Sehutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: CO ILMEN: None ABSENT: CO ILMlN: Krein fl.":'..,. t~ The Mayor telared Re.olution No. 68R-569 duly passed and adopted. ! Mayor Pebl t left the Council Chambers, (6:45 P.M.). PUB C HEAaING - GENERAL AMEND NT NO. 106: Initiated by the City Planning COMmission, to const r the adoption of an amendment to the Cireu1ation Ele- ment of the General an, to de~ignate Orange Avenue as a secondary arterial, as an exception betw n 335 feet east of Western Avenue to Western Avenue; recommended for apprtal, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-249. .nci1 stated that they had reviewed the report concern- tal Plan Amendment, as prepared by the Planning Staff. ing the Council; Schutte asked if anyone wished to address th. City response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 68R- for adoption, appro~ the City Planning Co Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-570 Plan Amendment No. 106, as recommended by Refer Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE MEM' TO THE GENERAL TY COUNCIl. OP THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMIRD- N DESIGNATED AS AMEtIDMENT NO. 106. ~" . '..,r,: \, >- ~ - .'" -.--4," Roll Call AYES: NOES: TEIPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: Du'tton, Schutte and Clark None Pebley Krein The Mayor o-Tem declared Resolution No. 68R-570 duly passed and adopted. RE ST FOR LICENSE - VA i ng Management COlllp4 Company was continue pending study and re Anaheim Area Visitor in the Disneyland-Co COMPANY: Request of Va1en Park- for lice se to operate the Town Tour Sightseeing to this date from the meeting of August 20, 1968, +mmendations of the Transportation Committee of the 4nd Convention Bureau, regarding need for bus service 'ercial-Recreational area. Letter dat 4 September 16, 1968, from Michael L. Va1en was sub- mitted, requesting a tontinuance so that the request may be considered by the full Council. On motion t Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark,sub- ject request was fur ~er continued to the meeting of October 1, 1968. MOTION CARRIED. n".;,.,':..."." <. ,..."", REC SSIFlCATION NO. 67- 51: Requ~st of Oscar E. Whitebook, Agent for Robert w. Quick, for six-me h extension of time to Reclassification No. 67-68-51, was submitted, toget tr with report and recommendations of the Development Services Department. On motion six-month extension as recommended by th t Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, a f time was granted, subject to the following conditions, Development Services Department: 1. That t . owner of subject property shall deed to the City of - Anaheim a strip of 1 +d 50 feet in width along both sides of Jefferson Street; for street construct .n purposes. 68-563 Cit eim California - CO 2. That a bon, in Anaheim, shall be posted with gineering requirements 0 tline tent No. 68R-135. MOTION CARRIED. tember 17 1968 1:30 P.M. n amount aad form satisfactory to the City of he City, to guarantee the installation of en- in Condition No.2 (a), of Resolution of In- CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Ac ~ons taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 26, ~68, pertaining to the following applications were sub~tted for Council inf ~tion and consideration: The City Planning denied said variance. CONDliIO USE PBIHIT NO. 105 .j mission to continue the repair of permitted M-1 uses (Retail outdoor display areas; propert The City Planning Co granted said conditional use p CONDITIO USE PEIKIT NO. 10 Nazarene, requesting permissio zoned property, located at 511 The City Planning C granted said conditional use p VARIANCE JO. 2003: Submitted tion, requesting waivers of re property, minimum number of c maximum wall height within fro to establish a 48-unit apartme north side of Lincoln Avenue, VARIANCE NO. 2005: Submitted requesting permission to estab Office, not abutting at least located within the Brookhurst and Brookhurst Street.) The City Planning C granted said variance, subject VARIANCE ~. 2006: Submitted minimum required side yard, to tion as a conforming use; R-I The City Planning granted said variance. Submitted by Nathan Smooke, requesting per- nd servicing of small tractors, with waivers "le of tra~tors), and required enclosure of located at 620 East Kate11a Avenue. ission, p~rsuant to Resolution No. PC68-263, it, subject to conditions. Submitted by West Anaheim Church of the !to expand existing church facilities; R-A outh Loara Street. ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-254, ! it, subject to conditions. California Federal Savings & Loan Associa- 'ired wall adjacent to R-A, Agricultural zone ed parki~ spaces, minimum unit floor area, setback area, and minimum structural setback, complex; C-1 zoned property, located on the st of Magnolia Avenue. On' ~,,'.... .." ;, I . ... .ssion, p~rsuant to Resolution No. PC68-253, Brookhurst Shopping Center, Incorporated, .sh a parcel of land for a United States Post public street or alley; C-I zoned property, pping Center, (northwest corner of Ball Road ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-258, conditions. William F. James, requesting a waiver of the stab1ish an existing and proposed room addi- ned property, located at 1701 Dallas Drive. .ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-259, VARIANCE NO. 2007: Submitted Gulf Oil Corporation, requesting waivers of number of free-standing signs mitted and location of free-standing sign, to permit erection ofidentific tionsign; M-l zoned property, located at the southwest corner of East Stree and Orangefair Lane. The City Planning granted said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2010: Submitted minimum required building setb zoned property, located south chester Avenue. The City Planning Co granted said variance, subject .ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-261, n.,.,"..,",'. I Hartmann Corporation, requesting waiver of , to establish an industrial warehouse; M-l the intersection of Adams Street and Man- ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-260, o conditions. 68-564 ' Ci 1968 The foreg~ _gactions, were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken .n the abo~e-numbered conditional use permit and var- iance applications. Dutton withdrew from deliberations on Variance No. 2007.) ~";,'..,"'. : ~:t~{ ~ ':t:,t II , t ", NO. 455: Submitted by Lamb of God Evangelical Lu- ing c1ari~ication of permitted uses. Petition ori- tmit addit~,.ona1 church facilities and a Sunday School; ~e northwest corner of South and Sunkist Streets. , The City P .nning Co~ission, by motion, interpret it to mean that school faci1iti . for the establishment of a regular private day school would be permitted Q subject p~operty. On motion t Councill$n Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark, the interpretation of th 1City Planning Commission was sustained. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO . 1-62-77 D VARIANCE NO 1444: The City Planning Commission, pursuant 0 Resolution No. PC68-257, recommended termination of Reclassification No. ~1-62-77 and Variance No. 1444; property located at the corner of Orange. venue and Bruce Street. Rec1assifi *tion No. 68-69-19 and Variance No. 2008 supersede the above petitions. n, ~J DUtton, Schutte and Clark Nbne Pebley Krein RESOLUTION NO. 681l- for adoption, termin Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-571 ing Reclassification No. 61-62-77. fo1ution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE 'tTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMIHATIRG ALL PROCEEDINGS IN coNNt iION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-77. Roll Call AYES: NOES: TEIPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: CO co CO CO ILMEN: ILMIN : ILMEN: ILMEN: The Mayor and adopted. to-Tem dec~ared Resolution No. 68R-571 duly pass.d RESOLUTION NO. 68R- for adoption, termin Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-572 ing Variance No. 1944. A RESOLUTION OF THE TY COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATIRG ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONN! ION WITH VARIANCE NO. 1944 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-225 NULL AND 'tOlD. n, '~ tJ AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte and Clark None Pebley Kt'ein Roll Call The Mayor and adopted. to-Tem declared Resolution No. 68R-572 duly passed Mayor Peb1 t returned to the Council Chambers, 6:50 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 1968: ~quest of Rex Coons for an extension of time and aaend- ment of dedication r ,uirements was submitted, together with raports and recommendations of t , City Planning Commission. (Property located at the southwest corner of .lnut Street and Cerritos Avenue.) 68-565 Cit elL MINUTES - Se tember 17 1968 1:30 P.M. On report and reco ndations of the City Attorney, Councilman Clark moved that the request for an extension of time to Variance No. 1968 be held over to the meeting of Septe er 24, 1968, to allow the applicant to be pres- ent. Councilman Schutte seco ded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED KENT TO ANAHEIM HUNt seconded by Councilman Clark, at 1:30 P.M., to consider a p pursuant to City Planning Co an amendment to Title 18, Cha Municipal Code, R-E, Resident paragraph (7) (d), and adding PAL CODE: On motion by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was scheduled October 1, 1968, bposed amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code, , ssion Resolution No. PC68-268, recommending ter 18.18, Section 18.18.030 of the Anaheim a1-Estate zone, by deleting thereform sub- subparagraph (9), as follows: " (9) No main struc ~re shall be located more than four hundred (400) feet fr ~ a standard fire hydrant with steamer con- nections. MOTION CARRIED 0 ORANGE COUNT USE PERMIT NO. 1354: ,Excerpt of the City Planning Commission meet- ing held September 11, 1968, ~rtaining to Orange County Use Permit No. 1354, Proposal to Establish an Outd ~r Storage Yard for heavy construction equip- ment, a shop building, and an ~ffice building, on property located south of Oranlethorpe Avenue, betwe n the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway tracks and Atwood Channel, wi b frontage access on the west side of Lake- wood Avenue, recommending app ~val, subJect to conditions, was submitted. Councilman Dutton moved to su tain the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and ordered said ~cerpt received and filed. Councilman ClaIk seconded the motion. MOTION ARRIED. PROPOSED S T NAME CHANGE - OLD CHARD DRI~E: Excerpt of the City Planning Commission meeting held Septeer 11, 19~8, pertaining to Orange County Street Naming Committee propo al to rename the old alignment of Orchard Drive to Kellogg Way, recomme oing that the east-west portion of the old Orchard Drive be renamed Wood ind Lane, and concurring with the committee in renaming the north-south p ttion as Kellogg Way, was submitted. Council- man Dutton moved to sustain t ~ recommendations of the City Planning Com- mission, and ordered said exc rpt received and filed. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION ARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-574 - AWARD OF commendations of the City Eng No. 68R-574 for adoption. RK ORDER O. 552A: In accordance with rec- eer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Refer to Resolution eook. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN tL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONI tT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABO t SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, tNCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CON TRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT; FURNISHING AND INS ALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF KATEL AVENUE AND NUTWOOD STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 552-A (Steiny & Mitchell - $7,238.00.) Roll Call Vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: tutton, Scht:::te, Clark and Pebley lone ~rein o n o -, 68-566 The Mayor 68R-574 duly passed and adopted. urION NO. 681.-575 - tions of the City En 575 for adoption. ORDER . 538-B: In accordance with recommend.- neer, Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R- ~' i~ liCe , ;e~;.'"" ~ t f n:, , olution Beok. I TY COUNCI1. or ',THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SMtlD A COJn'BAct 'l'OTBE LOWB5T R.lSPONSIBLE BIDDER :rol1111 , LABOR,. SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMlNTAND ALL TATION, I'CLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PIRFORM- TO CONSTtUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- D1ENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM WEST STREET TO LOMBARD IANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 538-B. (Sully-Miller Con- I ~,047050.) A RESOLUTION OF TIlE; PROPOSAL .AND AWARJ)I ' FUltNISHIRC OF ALL UTILITIES AND TRANS ING ALL WORK NECESS PROVEMENT: THE IMPR DRIVE, IN THE CITY 0 tracting Company - $ Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NO$e Krein The Mayor ~clared Resolution No. 68R-575 duly passed and adopted. BE UTION NO. 68R-576 - from the Director 0 68R-576 for adoption RK ORDER . 51 - 0 Upon receipt of Certification ub1ic Worts, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE THE COMPLETION AND AND EQUIPMENT AND Al4 AND WATER, AND THE P PLETE THE FOLLOWING CONTROL SIGNAL PRO CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPT!. FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATIRULS UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, lUEL ORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- LIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISH AND INSTALL RADIO SION SYSTEMS ON BROADWAY AND LINCOLN AVENUES IN THE o 516-B. (Smith Electric Supply.) AYES : NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Resolution No. 68R-576 duly passed and adopted. UTION NO 68R-577- from the Director 0 68R-577 for adoption. . 1211: Upon receipt of certification Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. n A RESOLUTION OF THE THE COMPLETION AND AND EQUI PMENT AND AL AND WATER, AND THE P PLETE THE FOLLOWING PERALTA HILLS DRIVE (De Leon Constructio Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCBITIIG , FURNISHIIIG OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATBRIALS !UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL , ORMANCB ()F ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND roM- LIC IMPR~VEMENT, TO WIT: THE. ADDINGTON-CERB.O VISTA- R IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1211. !Company. ) Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein The Mayor 'clared Resolution No. 68R-577 duly passed and adopted. 68-567 e~ California- er 17 1968 l'30 P.M. SOLUTIO.NO 68R-578 - WORK ORDE . 532-A~ Upon receipt of Certification from the Director of Public Works,ounci1man Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R- 578 for adoption. Refer to Resolution A RESOLU'fiON OF THE CITY COUNC ~ OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISH ~G OF ,ALL PLANT t LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIJ.IMENT AND ALL UTILITI t AND TRANSrollTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATBI., AND THEPEU'OIMARCE ()F ALLWORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE T. FOLLOWING PUBLIC I 'VBKBNT, TO WIT: THE JEFFBRSON STREET BRIDGE APPROACHKS TO SANTA ANA RIVER JIDGE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 532-A. (Donald F. Dresselhau8 > Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared o Scbutte, Clark and Pebley 68R-578 duly passed and adopted. IIIDS OF EAS~NT: Councilman Schu te offered Resolution Nos. 68R-579 to 68R- 581, both inclusive, for adopt ono RESOLUTI~N 000 68R-579:A RESOL ,ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA- HElM ACelPrING AN EASEMENT G DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CER- TAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EAS '. NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Kje11 H. and Kathryn Qva1e, gner C. and MOllie R. Qva1e, Andrew M. and Eleanor M. Regalia.) n RESOLUTI9N NOo 68R-580: A RES ~UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT T DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN lEAL PROPERTY FOR AN EMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUD- ING A SAlITARY SEWER. (Robert W. Quick.) RESOLUTION NO. 68R..,581: A RES LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPrING AN EASEMENT RANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN IlEAL PROPERTY FOR AN EMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ores to and Alma Grotto1a.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT : OOUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Clark and Pebley The Mayor declared solution Nos. 68R-579 to 68R-581, both in- clusive, duly passed and adopt d. PROPOSED NMENT - RESOLUTION 68R-582: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 68R-582 for adoptio ~ Refer n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTEN- TIoN TO VACATE AND ABANDON AN SEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFT DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREO ; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RE OLUTION. (68-5A; Vicinity of Jefferson Street and Riverda1e Avenue, Public H Bring October 8, 1968, 1:30 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ Schutte, Clark and Pebley 68- 568 - Se teaber 17 .M. , The Mayor 1ared Resolution No. 68R-582 duly passed and adopted. USOLtrrION NO. 681. - 583: cilman Schutte offer report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Coun- Resolution No. 68R-583 for adoption. Refer (1' ~, ~] A USOLUTION OF THE SETTLJImlIT or CERTAI ING THE ACCEPTANCE PADmHT IN CONNECTI COUNCI~OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIMAUTHORIZIHG THE HINT nQMAIN LI'fiGtTION; AUTHORIZING ,ANI) DIUCT- llEOORDATJON OF 'AN EASDIDT DEED, AND AUTII)R1ZING EUwI. TH. (Haze 1 I. Haag.) A YES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None KJtein Reao1ution No. 681.-583 duly passed and adopted. RE~UTI0NNO. 681.-584: cilman Schutteoffe report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Coun- Resolution No. 68R-S84 for adoption. A USOLt1lION OF THE SETTLIMElt'I' OF CERTAI ING THE ACCEPTANCE PAYMENT IN CONNECTI Y CO UNC In or THE CITY or ANAHEIM AtmI)RIztlll 'JIll RENT DCtMAIN LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING ANDDlalCt- llECORDATJON OF ,'AN EASBMDT DEED; AND AUTHORIZING ttHEREWITH. (Robert E. and Janel L. Carroll.) 1 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Krein Resolution No. 68R-S84 duly passed and adopted. PURq&ASE: The City Mana advised that Western said equipment in th ' recommended purchase reported on purchase of 200 Free Swing Unibracs, and .ghway Products, Inc., had submitted a quotation for unt of $5,145.00, including tax. He thereupon authorized at this time. On recomm said purchase be aut Western Highway Prod CARRIED. the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved the amount of $5,14S.00, including tax, from Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION PURCHASE: The Director 0 of a Caterpillar 951 ceptance of the low ~ublic Works reported on bids received for the purchase TraxcavaUor Loader, as follows, and recommended ae- ! , that of Shepherd Machinery Company, Los Angeles: VENDOR PRICE. INCLUDING TAX Shepherd Machinery C Johnson Tractor Com any, Los Angeles - - - - - - - -$25,525.50 Riverside - - - - - - - - - - -27 184 00 , ., . ---. iI i ~ -,# On the rec~ Clark moved that the purchase authorized . Dutton seconded the endation of the Director of Public Works, Councilman w bid of Shepherd Machinery Company be accepted and the amount of $25,525.5,1, including tax. Councilman ion. MO'lION CARRIED. 68-569 Cit California - CO 1968 1:30 P.M. CLAIMS AGAINSt THE CITY: The folIo 1ng claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and oLdered ref tred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark: a. Claim submitted J Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, for personal property damages, pur orted1y resulting from improper timing of traffic signal at Ball Poa~ an Flore Street, on or aboct June 25, 1968. b. Claim filed by S ~rley Jean Parker, for personal injury dam- ages, purportedly resulting fr ~ construction work in progress on Knott Ave- nue, on or about July 3l, 1968 Co Claim filed by B tty Lee Bills, for personal injury damages, purportedly resulting from con truction work in progress on Knott Avenue, on or about July 31, 1968. MOTION CARRIED. IROPOSED NOHL RANCH ROAD IMPROVEHE Consideration of a proposal to improve Nohl Ranch Road and develop ac .ss across City-owned property to a proposed subdivision in the Santa Ana C .yon area was continued to this date, to al- low Council inspection of the .bject property. The City Manager bri Western Land Sales Company, de offer is made to purchase the $l6,OOO.OO, and to purchase th construct a bridge across the side of Rohl Ranch Road, provi road. fed a letter dated September 12, 1968, from ,loper of the proposed subdivision, in which c I~ ~-:herly City-owned parcel for approximately southern City-owned parcel for a token amount, 100d control channel, a~...,1 :!.mprove the easterly !ng the City improve the westerly side of said The City Manager rec ~ended that the Council, in evaluating the proposal consider the value of the southerly City-owned parcel at the same unit price as that of the nort erly City-owned parcel. The City Attorney ca City and Mr. Nohl, which oblig of the roadway, the remainder Nohl, which he could negotiate the City assuming an obligatio that the City is in a position consideration, and recommended City-owned parcels on a basis provements for the road outsid led attention to the agreement between the ~ed the City to develop the center 24 feet f the development to be the obligation of Mr. with mv,'.~l-;,-"f adjoining parcels. He questioned outside the terms of the agreement. He noted to receive full value for the two parcels under that the City Council negotiate the sale of the hat would not obligate the City to pay for im- the terms of the existing agreement. At the conclusion of the discussion the City Council requested the City Manager to further negoti te with Western Land Sales Company to obtain an offer to purchase, assuming the responsibility for full road improvements. Mayor Pebley left PROPOSED AME NT TO RESOLUTION mendation of the City Manager, lution No. 66R-526, establishi with Title 17, Land Developmen of the Anaheim Municipal Code, T...' , the Recreation and Cul tur Improvements Committee, to dis meeting, 7:20 P.M. 66R-526 - IN LIEU FEES: On report and recom- tonsideration of a proposed amendment to Reso- g fees to be charged by the City in connection and resources, Chapter 17.08, Subdivisions, was deferred, to allow the City Council to meet 1 Arts Sub-committee of the Citizens Capital uss their recommendations. The City Manager was instructed to schedule the ..eeting for the evening of October 3, 1968, if agreeable to the members of the sub-committee. RE UEST - PACIFIC AIR TRANSPORT I from Pacific Air Transport, I port of their application befo for authority to establish air port and the three major airpo Correspondence dated September 9, 1968, ., was submitted, requesting City Council sup- e the California Public Utilities Commission, passen .~L service between the Long Beach Air- ts in the San Francisco Bay area. o n n ~'~ .'~ i ;t;, ! " ""- 68-570 IL - S.e t*er 17 .M. On motion request vas ordered Counci1m4n Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark, said K>TION CARRIED. CORtPPONDINCI: The folt motion by Councilman ing correspondence was ordered received and filed on tton, seeonded by Councilman Clark: a. City a ''Watson Amendment," b. County letters forwarded by ing construction of c. Finane , 1 ~untingtol1 Beach Resolution No. 2830 -opposing the i 1968. f.Orange Probation Department - enclosed copies of em to the Orange County Airport Commission concern- proposed metroportadjacent to the Anaheim Stadium, 1 and Operating Reports for the month of August, ~I 10. 2575: Ordi~nce No. 2575 for adoption. Refer nance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE 18.18 AND 18.20 OF Y OF ANAQBIKAHlRDIIG TITLE 18, CHAPTBR5 18.16, ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODI. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte and Clark NQne Krein and Pebley The Mayor -Tem declared Ordinance No. 2575 duly passed and adopted. f1 r ':1 : ....f; ORDIlANCENO. 2576: Clark offered Ordinance No. 2576 for adoptioa. Refer AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIPAL CODE RELATING Y OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHBIM MUIII- (61-62-69 (28) - M-1.) Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Schutte and Clark None Krein and Pebley ~-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2576 duly passed and The Mayor adopted. ORDIlANCE NO. 2577: reading. offered Ordinance No. 2577 for first AN ORDINANCE OF THE C ty OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- cIpAL CODE RELATING T I ZONING. (67-68-73 - R-3.) n . .., OBD~CE NO. 2578; Counc.~man Clark offered Ordinance No. 2578 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE C ty OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10. 16 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL' ~ODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 10.16.470. ORDIIANCE NO. 2579: Counc lman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2579 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE C a OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS" ASSOCIATION UNIFORM r E CODE, REVISED 1967, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND AMENDING TITLE 16, C ~ ER 16.08, SECTIONS 16.08.010 THROUGH 16.08.040 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL tODE. (Public Hearing to be Held October 8, 1968, 1 : 30 P. M. ) 68-571 Cit ALCOHOLIC B RAGE LICENSE APPLI by the City Manager to the Ci a. Application su General, (Bona Fide Eating P Room, 2219-21 West Ball Road, on said application. b. Application su Beer, for Windsor House, at On motion by Counc City Attorney was authorized Beverages Control Board, on cated in a C-l zone which re of alcoholic beverages. MO c. Application su On Sale Beer and Wine, for (C-1 zone.) 1:30 P.M. ONS: The following applications were presented Council for their information: tted by H.OoPo Services, Inc., for On Sale e), Person-to-Person Transfer, for the Jester Anaheim (C-1 zone). No Council action was taken ,itted by Richard D. Bothwell, for new On Sale 5 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, (C-l zone.) n Dutton,seconded by Councilman Clark, the file Conditional Protest with the Alcoholic basis that the premises are presently 10- ires a conditional use permit for the on-sale CARRIED. 'itted by Trini's Restaurants, Inc., for new 'ini's Restaurant, 940 South Brookhurst Street, On motion by Counc.~n Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark, the City Attorney was authorized file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverages Control Board, pe "I g disposition of Conditional Use Permit No. 1060. MOTION CARRIEDo 1M SERVICEMEN'S C September 16,1968, from the requesting permission to 10 Lot, to be used for temporar Anaheim. area. Mr. Murdoch advis resentatives of the UoSoO. w mended consideration of the nate the possibility of a du The Council concurred with t LEAGUE OF C IFORNIA CITIES - CO communication dated Septemb requesting the City Council ternate for the Annual Leagu R: The City Manager briefed a letter, dated heim Servicemen's Center for Orange County, a trailer on the Convention Center Parking facilities for assisting servicemen in the the City Council that a meeting with the rep- scheduled for September 20, 1968, and recom- 'bject request be deferred one week, to e1imi- lication of efforts between the two groups. recommendation of the City Manager. CEDEL TESo The City Manager briefed '11, 1968, from the League of California Cities, designate a voting representative and an a1- Conference, to be held October 13 - 16, 1968. On motion by Counc.1man Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Mayor Pebley was designated as vot. g delegate, and Councilman Schutte as alternate delegate. MOTION CARRIED. ORCHARD DRIVE ANNEXATION - RESOLU tions, checked and found to habited territory known and RESOLUTION NO. 68R-585: adoption. Refer A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY CO OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXA CITY OF ANAHEIM DESIGNATING DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public He Roll Call Vote: N NO. 68 -585: The City Clerk submitted peti- sufficient, requesting annexation of an unin- signated as Orchard Drive Annexation. i1man Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-585 for IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECBIPr N OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE TERRITORY AS THE ORCHARD DRIVE ANNEXATION; E TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING CE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PRO- PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE ing, October 20, 1968, 1:30 P.M.) o n n Cit u - S t8lRber 11 ,1968 1- 30 ,..M. 68-572',. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: D~tton, Schutte, and Clark None Ktein and Pebley The Mayor -Tem declared Resolution No. 68R-585 duly passed and adopted. ~" .,'"., ;~ !ALIi OFTAX-DIIDED LAND: eCity M4nager reported on request received from the . County Tax Collector, to approve Tax Sale No. 1035 to the 'Magnolia School District. The su~~ei parce~ w.e described as a well site, surrounded by Magno1iaSchpo1 Dist t property. n",., !J Public WOrks indicated that Mr. Jaeger, of Anaheim contacted several weeks ago and had not yet met to make the necessary arrangements .to have the On the rec that the agreement onded the motion. endation of the City Manaaer, Councilman Clark moved ale and p~rchase be approved. Councilman Dutton sec- ON CARRIID. 's DIVISION vitationto the Cit~ sion of the Anaheim ing for confirmation and Clark indicated R OF The City Manager relayed an in- unci1 to attend the first meeting of, the WGlMa'aDivi- mber of Commerce, to be held September 26, 1968, ask- those planning to attend. Councilmen Dutton, Schutte, y would attend the mczting. PRO T - JITNIY aration of signs mar (authorized at the NS: Councilman Clark asked for a report on the prep- "Jitney Stop," for Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., ing of J~ly9, 1968.) The Direct Jitney Systems, Inc." with the Traffic Engi signs prepared. REC SSIFICATION NO. 65-6 made in connection wi cation Noo 65-66-100 Orangewood.) 00: Councilman Clark requested a report on progress requiring compliance with conditions to Rec1assifi- (property located at northeast corner of Euclid and Th~ Zoning ~perVisor indicated that the principals have been con- tacted, that an engiFring survey is U,nder way, preliminary to construction of the re:uired block ;,a1l, and a meeting has been scheduled to decide the height, color, and ch ~ce of materials for the wall. ADJOfINHBNT : motion. moved to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the ADJOURNED: SIGNID ~. nl '.:,. ,,- :,- 68-573 Cit 1968 1:30 P.K. naheim Ca1ifornia- The City Council the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRKSElt'I': COUNCILMEN: Dutt C1ar COUNCILMEN: Krei CITY MANAGER: Ke ASSISTANT CITY CITY ATTORNEY: J CITY CLERK: Dene CITY ENGINEER: J ZONING SUPERVISOR n (entered the meeting at 3:15 P.M.,) Schutte, and Pebley ABSENT: PRlSBIft: qh A. Murdoch GER: RobertM. Davis ieph Geis1~r . Wi11i~ s P. MadcJox Ronald Tiompson the meeting to order. INYO~tION: Reverend Duane gave the Invotati of the First Southern Baptist Church, FUG flALUTE: Councilman Cl to the Flag. led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheimqity Counc~l meeting, held September 10, 1968, were approved, on motion by Councilman Schutte, secon~ by Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF ING - ORDINANCES the reading in full of all the waiver of reading is he ins of the title, specific of such ordinance or reso1u MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTI NS: Councilman Clark moved to waive dinances and resolutions, and that consent to ,by given by all Councilmen, unless after read- .quest is made by a Councilman for the reading ion. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. REPORT - F NANCIAL DEMANDS AGINS amount of $816,624.46, in a THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the ordancewith the 1968-69 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC H ING - LA PALMA-MIRA ANNEXATION: Pursuant to Resolution No. 68R- 474, duly published in the heim Bulletin and the P1acentia Courier, August 21 and 28, 1968, and written notices mailed to the owners of pro- perty according to the last equalized assessment roll, public hearing was held on proposed annexation of uninhabited territory known and designated as the La Pa1ma-Miraloma An exation. no written protests had been filed The City in her office. Mayor Pebley aske if anyone in the audience wished to address the City Council; there bei g no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-586: 586 for adoption. nci1man Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R- Refer to A RESOLtrrION OF THE CITY C MINING THAT A MAJORITY PRO THE AllNEXATION OF CERTAIN KNOWN AND DES! GNAT ED AS LA CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- T HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR NHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM , LMA-MIRAOOMA ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: Schutte, Clark and Pebley None Dutton Krein Resolution No. 68R-586 duly passed and adopted. a n n