1968/11/19
68-679
Cit
PRESElft~
ABSENT:
PR.I8E11r :
naheim California-
1: 30. f.M.
The City Council
of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCILMEN~ Krei,
at 1:
COUNCILMEN: None
CITY MNAGER: Ke
CITY ATTORNEY: j
CITY CLERK: Dene
CITY INGIHEER: .J
ZOlCING SUPERVISOR:
Clark, Pebley and Dutton (entered
A. Murdoch
,eph B. Gels ler
'. Wi lli&llU$
s P. Maddox
Ronald Thompson
Mayor Pebley call
the meeting to order.
FLAG ~urE: Councilman Kr ~n led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
PROC~TION: KayorPeb1ey proclaimed Friday, November 29, 1968, "American
Field Service Day'.
RIIOLIJION OF C9NDOLENCES: "yor Pebley issued the following Resolution of
Condolences:
WllliREAS, the qreat Creator, in the exercise of His Divine
Wisdom, has seen tt to summon unto Himself His faithful servant,
Lutetia Bailey Kuiel; and
WHEREAS, Mrs Kuchel is remembered by all who were privileged
to know her as a ,ar and understanding friend, a gracious lady,
and a prominent c tizen of Anaheim for ninety-three years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs Kuchel was actively interested in history and
the cultural adv& cement of the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, in ~65~ Mrs. Kuchel unselfishly donated the complete
file of papers co ncing with Volume No.1, Issue No.1, of 1870
to 1960 of the A heim Gazette, the first Orange County Newspaper,
to the library of the University of California at Irvine for future
historical resear h of the County,
NOW, THEREFO , , be it resolved that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim w ~hes to express sincere, heartfelt sympathy to
her sons, Theodor B. and Senator Thomas H. Kuchel, and their
families.
ATTEST:
sl Calvin L. Pebley. Mayor
sl A.J. Schutte. Mayor pro-tem
sl Fred T. Krein. Councilman
SI Jack C. Dutton. Councilman
BE IT FURTH
upon the minutes
RESOLVED that this Resolution be spread in full
f the City Council.
The foregoi
this 19th day
resolution is unanimously approved and signed
vember, 1968.
S D ne M. Willi
City Clerk, Anah
sl Ralph B. Clark. Councilman
INTRODUCT~9N OF NEW EMPLOYEES:
introduced new employees a
Orientation Program.
rvey Rose of the City Personnel Department
ending the Council meeting as part of the City
Mayor Pebley wel
ed the new employees to the City Family.
".
o
n
n
68-680
Ci Hall
1968 1:30 P.M.
MINUTES: Minutes of the
ber 6, 1968, were a
cilman Krein. MOT I
aheim City Council meetings held October 29 and Novem-
oved on qotion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Coun-
CARRIED.
IT
WAIVER OF READING - ORDI SOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to
waive the reading i full of a]l ordinances and resolutions, and that con-
sent to the waiver reading ~s hereby given by all Councilmen, unless af-
ter reading of the t.t1e, spectfic request is made by a Councilman for the
reading of such ordi nce or r~solution. Councilman Clark seconded the mo-
tion. MOTION UNANI SLY CARRDED.
RE
HE CITY; Demands against the City, in the
ordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved.
PRO
SED PURCHASE OF E
of a tractor and 1
quested that Council
bid up to $10,000.00
Trailer, to be aucti
NT: The City Manager reported on proposed purchase
ed trai1e~, for which funds have been budgeted, and re-
authorize the Mechanical Maintenance Superintendent to
on a used!Peterbilt Tractor and Martin 35 Ton Lowbed
ned Wednesiday, November 20, 1968.
On motion y Council~n Clark, seconded by Councilman Schutte, s.id
authorization was gr nted. MOT[ON CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2602: Coun 1lman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2602 for adoption.
The City C erk read in full the urgency ordinance offered by Coun-
cilman Schutte., pro ding for ~-A zoning on property known and designated
as Santa Ana Canyon nnexationNo. 2.
Refer to R solution Bbok.
IT
AN IJtrERIM ORDINANCE 4)F THE CIT~ OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELAT ire TO ZONIkG. (Santa Ana Canyon Annexation No.2 - R-A.)
Roll Call
Ordinance No. 2602 duly passed and adopted.
AYES: CO
NOES: CO
ABSENT: CO
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
Npne
None
The Mayor
PUB C HEARING - RECLASS 68-69- Initiated by the City Planning
Commission, to consi r a chang in zone, from County A-l Agricultural Zone
to Anaheim R-A Zone. Property known as Santa Ana Canyon Annexation No.2.
(North of Santa Ana anyon Road at the extension of Walnut Canyon Road.)
The City Panning Comeission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-3l6,
recommended said rec assification be approved unconditiona11y.
Zoning Sup .visor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject
property, which is a ~roximately 36 acres in. size, the existing uses and
zoning in the immedi te area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and con-
sidered by the City lanning CO$mission.
r
I
Mayor Pebl y asked if anyone present wished to address the City
Council; there being response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-7 Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-7l0
for adoption, author iingthe preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as recommen ad by the eity Planning Commission.
68-681
eim California - C
ES - November 19
1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COliNC ~ OF THE qITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE IM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUND [ES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED 0
(68-69-34 - R-A.)
Roll Call Vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
()
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN~
68R-7l0 duly passed and adopted.
The Mayor declared
ORDINANct NO. 2603:
reading.. .
Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2603 for first
AN ORDIN6NCE OF THE CITY OFA~IM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELl.TING TO ZONING. (68- '-34 - R-A.) .
I - RECLASSIFICATION 68-69-35 Submitted by William D. and Ruth
B. Prichard, requesting a chaR of zone from R-I to R-3, property located
on the nerth side of North Str .t, east of Orange Avenue, (805 East North
Street.)
The City Planning Co ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-3l2,
recommen4ed said reclassificat ,On be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That the
Anaheim the sum of l5~
purposes.
subject property shall pay to the City of
foot alomg North Street, for tree planting
n
2. That the owners
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per f
ing purposes.
3. That the sidewal
Street, as required by the Cit
and specifications on file in
4. That trash stora
approved plans on file with th
5. That a 6-foot ma
property line, adjacent to R-l
6. That any air-con
shielded from view, and the so
homes.
7. That parking are
mum 6-foot in height and shall
protect the residential integri
8. That the owners 0
Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per d
tion purposes, prior to the iss
9. That Condition No
with within a period of 180 day
as the City Council may grant.
10. That Condition No
complied with prior to final bu
f subject property shall pay to the City of
nt foot along North Street, for street light-
and driveways shall be installed along North
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans
office of the City Engineer.
areas shall be provided in accordance with
office of the Director of Public Works.
ry wall shall be constructed along the east
ned property.
~ioning facilities proposed shall be properly
shall be buffered from adjacent residential
shall be lighted with down-lighting a maxi-
e directed away from the property lines to
y of the area.
subject property shall pay to the City of
lling unit, to be used for park and recrea-
nce of a Building Permit.
· 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied
from the date hereof, or such further time
· 3, 4, 5,6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be
ldingand zoning inspections.
Mr. Thompson noted th
ing uses and zoning in the imme
to and considered by the City P
change of zone is in conformanc
General Plan.
location of the subject property, the exist-
Late area, and briefed the evidence submitted
.nning Co~ission, noting that the requested
with the land use designated in the Anaheim
n
Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant was present and in agreement
with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which the app-
licant replied affirmatively. e then asked if anyone wished to speak in
opposition; there being no resp .se, declared the hearing closed.
68-682
Cit Hall Anaheim
rnia - CO CIL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUfION NO. 68R- 1: Counc:~lman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-7l1
for adoption, autho zing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as request a, subject to the conditions recommended by the City
Planning Commission
Refer to @solution aook.
A RESOLUIION OF THE (tITY COUNCJL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 1 ,OF THE AN.tuIE. IM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT 1HE BOUNDAtIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(68-69-35 - R-3.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
$utton," Krein, Schutte, . Clark and Pebley
1Ione
!tone
l
The Mayor
Resolution No. 68R-7ll duly passed and ~dopted.
ORDINABCE NO. 2604:
The City Clerk read
Krein to establish
La Palma-Mira1oma
:ilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2604 for adoption.
full th~ urgency ordinance offered by Councilman
: erim zoning on property known and designated as the
xation . "t'.~,,"
Refer
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CI~Y OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 180F THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE ~ NG TO ZON]~G. (La Palma-Miraloma Annexation - R-A.)
Roll Call
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
Nbne
Nbne
Ordinance No. 2604 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLI C HEARING - REC S
Commission, to consi
County 100-Ml-20,000
(0)-20,000 to Anahei
described as La Pal
ICATION N . 68-69-36: Initiated by the City Planning
tr a changb of zone on Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4, from
to Anaheim R-A; and on ParcelS, from County 100-Ml-
R-A(O), Agricultural (Oil Production) Zones. Property
.Miraloma Annexation.
The City Panning COmbission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-3l7,
recommended that sai reclassification be approved unconditionally for R-A,
on Parcel No.1, and t-A(O), on Parcel No.5.
Mr. Thomps tt noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in t d immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
Council;
y asked if anyone present wished to address the City
no response, declared the hearing closed.
n
RESOLUIrON NO. 68R-7
for adoption, author
the zone on Parcels
mission, and changin
cultural Zone.
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-7l2
zing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
s. 1 and 5, as recommended by the City Planning Com-
the zone on Parcel Nos. 2, 3, and 4, to R-A, Agri-
Refer
68..683
ES - November 19
l:30 P.M.
.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO ~L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ~EIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENBED AND THAT THE BOUND kIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(68-69-36 - R-A and R-A(O).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
OOUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Vutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
~one
'one
The Mayor declared
No. 68R-712 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2605: Council
reading.
offered Ordinance No. 2605 for first
AN ORDIRANCE OF THE CITY OF 4HEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (6869-36 - R-A and R-A(O).
PUBLIC HEARI - RECLASSIFICATION . 68-69.3;: Initiated by the City Planning
Commission, to consider a cha e in zone on Parcel Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, to
M-l, Lilht Industrial Zone, 4 M-l (0), Light Industrial (Oil Production),
on Parcel No.5, property des Jtibed as La Palma-Miraloma Annexation.
The City Planning C ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-31S,
recommended said reclassifica ton be approved, subject to the following con-
ditions:
Parcel No.1:
1. That dedications
streets within the area, acco
Plan Highway Right-of-Way, pri
the property.
2. That all enginee ing requirements of the City of Anaheim, such
as curbs and gutters, sidewal ~ street grading and paving, drainage facili-
ties, or other appurtenant wor shall be complied with as required by the
City Engineer and in accordanc with standard plans and specifications on
file in the office of the City Engineer at the time the property is developed.
3. That the owner 0 the property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foo for street lighting purposes, said amount
to be paid at the time the pro ~rty is developed.
\) 4. That a prelimina y title report shall be furnished prior to the
adoption of the ordinance rezo ing the property, showing legal vesting of title,
legal description, and contain ng a map of the property.
5. That all plans f r development of the property shall be submitted
to and approved by the Archite tural Control Committee on the basis of compat-
ibility of development, both s ~ucturally and architecturally.
6. That ordinances eclassifying the property shall be adopted as
each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel;
PROVIDED, however, that the wo d "parcel" shall mean presently existing
parcels of record and any pare 1 or parcels approved by the City Council
for a lot split.
7. That trash stora
approved plans on file with th
~hall be made to the City of Anaheim on all
~ng to the Circulation Element of the General
~ to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning
shall be provided in accordance with
of the Director of Public Works.
Parcel No.2:
1. That the owner 0
Anaheim a strip of land 32 fee
along Coronado Street, for str
2. That the paving
required by the City Engineer,
specifications on file in the
subject property shall deed to the City of
in width, from the centerline of the street
at widening purposes.
all be installed along Coronado Street, as
and in accordance with standard plans and
ffice of the City Engineer.
Parcel No.3:
1. That the owner 0
Anaheim a strip of land 32 fee
along Red Gum Street, includi
widening purposes.
subject property shall deed to the City of
in width from the centerline of the street
a IS-foot radius corner return, for street
o
n
I.r.n..............
I
I
Cit
l;30 P.M.
68 -684
Anaheim Cali
- CO CIL MINUTES - November 19
,-"
t I
2. That he street improvement plans shall be prepared and all
engineering require ents of the City of Anaheim along Red Gum Street and
La Palma Avenue, su as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and
paving, drainage fa ilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed
as required by the ity Engine4r and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on f"le in the Qffice of the City Engineer; and that a bond
in an amount and fo satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to g antee the installation of said engineering require-
ments.
,J
lly.
Parcel
Parcel No.5:
1. That t
Anaheim a strip of 1
along White Star Ave
2. That s
gineering requiremen
as curbs and gutters
ties, or other appur
Engineer and in acco
in the office of the
satisfactory to the
tee the installation
3. That t
Anaheim the sum of $
lighting purposes.
4. That t
approved plans on fi
e owner of' subject property shall deed to the City of
nd 32 feet,: in width from the centerline of the street
4e,for st~~et widening purposes.
reet impro~ement plans shall be prepared and all en-
s of the City of Anaheim along White Star Avenue, such
sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili-
enant work shall be completed as required by the City
iance with standard plans and specifications on file
City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form
ity of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guaran-
of said engineering requirements.
e owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
.00 per front foot along White Star Avenue, for street
ash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
e with the office of the Director of Public Works.
n
Mr. Thomps n noted the subject property is comprised of the same
parcels acted upon i Reclassification No. 68-69-36, above, and briefed the
evidence submitted t and consi~ered by the City Planning Commission in mak-
ing their recommenda ion.
Mayor Pebl y asked if anyone wished to address the City Council;
there being no respo declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-7 Councilman Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-7l3
for adoption, author. ing the p~eparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone, subject to e conditfons recommended by the City Planning Com-
mission.
Refer
olution Book.
A RESOLUTION 9F THE C ~Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 F THE ANAaEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT BOUNDARI!ES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(68-69-37 - M-l and 1(0).
,.,
I
j
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Resolution No. 68R-7l3 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor d
ORDINANCE NO. 2606: Counc lman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2606 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C TY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICI-
PAL CODE RELATING TO NING. (68-69-37 (1) - M-l - Parcel 4 Only.)
68-685
Cit Hall Anaheim California-
UIlS - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
CONDITIO USE fERMIT NO. 1065- Public Hearing on Conditional Use Permit No.
10'5 .as deferred until lat in the meeting, pending arrival of the At-
torney representing appella t of action taken by the City Planning Com-
mission. (See Page 68- 692 )
PUBLIC
and C.M. Bengo~hea, request
West Mac Arthur Manor, Anah
revi~ed by the City Counci
ment Services Department.
T: Application submitted by G.G. Liekhus
,8 permission to move a dwelling from lOl
~m, to 825 North Topeka Street, Anaheim, was
together with recommendations of the Develop-
f]
The Mayor asked
dress the City Council.
the applicant was present and wished to ad-
The app1icant,Mr. ~harles Bengochea, requested clarification
of the 20-foot setback requ rement and was advised by Mr. Thompson that
it referred to a front setb ~k. The applicant then stated that the con-
ditioDS were satisfactory.
Mayor Pebley aske tif anyone wished to address the City Council
in opposition; there being . response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLJiION NO. 68R-7l4: Co.cilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-7l4
for aioption, granting said IJouse Moving Permit, subject to the following
conditions recommended by t 4 Development Services Department:
Refer to Resoluti
Book.
o
1. Payment of a Recreation fee on the new
uni t .
2. Provision of :minimum 20-foot setback, to conform with
the adjoining ~tructures.
A RESOLurION OF THE CITY CO
MOVING PERMIT TO G.G. LIEKH
FROM 101 WEST MAC ARTHUR
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE
AND C. M. BENGOCHEA TO l<<>VE A DWELLING
, ANAHEIM, TO 825 NORTH TOPEKA STREET,
Roll Call Vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
None
None
68R-7l4 duly passed and adopted.
The Mayor declare
RECLASSIFIgfTION NO. 68-69-33: City Planning CODlDission, .at their meeting
held OCtober 21,1968, termi ~ed by motion all proceedings on Reclassi-
fication No. 68-69-33, on th 'basis that annexation proceedings and re-
classification of the proper y to the City of Anaheim R-3 zone would be
in effect prior to any cons! eration by the City Council, since annexa-
tion took place October 18, P68, and Ordinance No. 2577, in Reclassifi-
cation No. 67-68-73, zoning ~e property R-3, will be effective November
21, 1968; property known as range-Thistle Annexation.
By general consent
sustained, and report ordere
action of the City Planning Commission was
received and filed.
0:.......,.............
f
t
68...686
Cit Hall Anaheim Cali
ClL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-
of time and approval
No. 61-62-104 was s
vices Department and
Sycamore Street, eas
'-104: Request of L. Fern Chandler, for an extension
of revise~ plans in connection with Reclassification
mitted, together with report of the Development Ser-
City Engiqeer; property located on the north side of
of Centu~y Drive.
n"',,;"",t,"
:f. .. -_.' ,~,
"
i
On recomme
motion by Councilman
extension of time to
tion of the sidewalk
No. 62R-585, within
CARRIED.
of it he Development Services Department, and on
secbnded by Councilman Schutte, a six-month
MB& 15, 1969, was granted subject to comple-
portion o~! Condition No. 3-A of Resolution of Intent
o days, as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 543. Req~st of Mrs. V.B. White for an extension of
time to Conditional $e Permit ~o. 543, for construction of a church at
~ 1759 Orange Avenue, .s submittbd together with recommendation of the De-
velopment Services D partment.
On motion y Councilmpn Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, a
lBO-day extension of time to expire May 15, 1969, was granted as recommended
by the Development S rvices Dep~rtment. MOTION CARRIED.
FI P -TRACT NO. 669. Develop~r - J.W. Mc Michael Company; tract located
on the north side of )roadway, east of Magnolia Avenue, and contains 91
proposed R-2-5,000 z ted lots, (Reclassification No. 68-69-14, Parcel B.)
The City gineer reported said Final Map conforms substantially
with the Tentative p previously approved, that bond has been posted and
forwarded to the Cit Attorney for approval, and required fees paid, and
he recommended appro al thereof.
1
On recomme dation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved
that Final Map, TracNoo 6691 be approved, subject to approval of required
bond by the City Att rney. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC DANCE HALL PERMIT:
public dance hall pe
1721 South Mancheste
the Chief of Police,
Schutte. MOTION CA
Applicatton filed by Michael E. Madden, Jr., for
,it to all~ a young adult entertainment center at
Avenue, was submitted and denied, as recommended by
an motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
ED.
The applic
tion with the applic
to address the City
t submitted a written request to be heard in connec-
ion, and Hayor Pebley granted Mr. Madden permission
nci 10
Mr. Madden
his application rece
had been invested in
vided; and that the
than any other public
tated that he was willing to work with the City if
d favorable consideration; that $15,000.00 to $20,000.00
e propos ad operation; that ample parking would be pro-
oposed Underground Young Adult Nightclub is different
dance hall permitted in the past in the City.
Council dis ussion ens,ued, noting difficulties which the City has
experienced in the pa t with similar operations and the resultant cost to
the taxpayer for poli ing such locations.
~
Mr. Madden
club, which included
with no liquor to be
at the door anQ he wo
to do so. He noted t
He reported that the
to locate there, but
further stated that h
clubs similar to the
culties.
escribed the activities planned for the proposed night-
ntertainmeint, dancing to live music, and billiard tables,
erved. He stated that the nightclub will be policed
ld pay for additional City police officers if required
at the building is to be fully carpeted and well lighted.
ity of Fullerton was very cooperative when he proposed
as unable to find a suitable building. Mr. Madden
had had experience as an employee in two or three
ne he proposed, and had never experienced any diffi-
68-687
eim California-
1:30 P.M.
Following further ~cussion, Council determined that action on
said application would be re ~wed only upon an affirmative recommendation
by the Chief of Police.
FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 6752: Devel
located on the west side of
contained S6 proposed R-l zo
er - J.W. Klug Development Corporation; tract
p Vista Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, and
, lots. (68-69-4 and Variance No. 1993.)
The City Engineer
with tb@ tentative map previ
forwarded to the City Attorne
he recOBmended approval there
orted said Final Map conforms substantially
ly approved; that bond has been posted and
approval, and required fees paid, and
On the recommendati r of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton
moved tbat Final Map, Tract ~ 6752 be approved, subject to approval of
required bond by the City Att ~ney. Councilman Clark seconded the motion.
z.l>TION CARRIED.
Refer
USOLUTIOB .. 68R-7lj: Councilma Clark offered Resolution No. 68R-7l5 for
adoptiOl1.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO
MEN! GBI.NT DEED CONVEYING TO
AN EASIllENT FOR ROAD AND PUBL
Talt.)
L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASE-
E CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
UTILITY PURPOSES. (Alan R. and Marjorie J.
Roll Call Vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
~rein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
button
~one
The Mayor declared
68R-7l5 duly passed and adopted.
CLASSIFI TION NO. 67-68-70' Irrevocable
as described therein, executed by Alan R.
ction with Reclassification No. 67-68-70,
to form and recordation thereof authorized,
seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
~cilman Dutton voted "No.'"
IRREVOCAB E FF OF DEDICATION -
offer dedication of proper
and Marjorie J. Talt, in conj
was subaitted and approved as
on motion by Councilman Clark
CARRIED. 'To this motion, Co
DEDI CAT I ACCESS RIGHTS - R SIr 0 . 67- -7. Onmot1on by Coun-
cil_n Clark, seconded by Co. ,ilman Schutte,dedication of all pedestrian
and vehicular access riahts f .m Parcel B to a street on the southerly boun-
dary of Parcel A, by Alan R. .d Marjorie J. Talt, in connection with Re-
classification No. 67-68-70 w . accepted by the City Council, and recorda-
tion thereof was authorized. loTION CARRIED. 'To this motion, Councilman
Dutton voted uNo.'"
ORDINANCE NO. 2607: Councilman Cl rk offered Ordinance No. 2607 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDllANCEOF THE CITY OF
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
HElM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
(67-68-70 - R-3.)
RESOLUIION . 68R-7l6 - AWARD OF
dations of the City Engineer,
716 for adoption.
recommen-
68R-
Refer to Resolution look.
(]
o
f
I
I
01
i
68-688
Cit Hall Anaheim Cali
1968 1:30 P.M.
"."
~ I'
..J
A RESOLUTION OF THE !TY COUNC~L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
fROfOSAL AND AWARD I A CONTRAdT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL P , LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANS RTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORKNECESS !{ TO CONsmUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: THE IMPRJ VEMENT OF PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE AND WALNUI STREET,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHE M, WORK ORDER NO. 557B. (R.J. Noble - $15,432.25.)
Roll Call ate;
AYES;; CO
NOES: CO
ABSENT: CO
Refer
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
Npne
Nbne
The Mayor
Re~olution No. 68R-716 duly passed and adopted.
BE LUTION NO. 68R-7l7 -
mendations of the Ci
68R-7l7 for adoption
ORDER NO. 1212: In accordance with recom-
Councilman Clark offered Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDIN A CONTRACt TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL P lIT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANS a.TATION, I~CLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSA Y TO CONST~UCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: THE RIO ISTA STREEt SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 39
FEET NORTH OF LINCOL AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1,063 FEET NORTH THEREOF, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1212. (U.S. Pipeline, Inc. - $11,777.00.)
1
t.t.~
1213 AND 5027: In accord-
Councilman Dutton offered
Roll Call
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
D_tton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
N()ne
None
The Mayor
Re$olution No. 68R-7l7 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-7l8 -
. ance with recommenda
Resolution No. 68R-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE
PROPOSAL AND AWARDI
FURNISHING OF ALL P
UTILITIES AND TRANS
ING ALL WORK NECESS
PROVEMENT: THE CHA
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, I
1213 AND 5027. (Zar
TY COUNCII., OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
A CONTRAC1 TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
ATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
AVENUE-ltARBOR BOULEVARD STREET, STORM DRAIN AND
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NOS. 547B, 556B,
Company - $561,757.47.)
n
J
j
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
None
No~ne
The Mayor d
Resolution No. 68R-7l8 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-7l9 - A RD OF CO RACT FOR CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS:
In accordance with re ormnendatioins of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton
offered Resolution No 68R-7l9 for adoption.
olution Book.
68-689
Cit
UTES - November 19
naheim Ca1ifornia-
1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO 11 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONI CT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING TO THE CITY OF A EIM OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS.
(Pacific States Cast Iron Pi ~ Company - $97,333.00.)
AYES ~
NOES:
ABSENT:
68R-7l9 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN;
COUNCILMEN:
Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
The Mayor
RESOLUTION ID. 6BR-720: Council ~ Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-720 for adop-
tion.
Refer
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CORRECTING OR RE-
LOCATIBG A CERTAIN BOUNDARY NE BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE CITY
OF ORANGE AND DESCRIBING THE .ORRECTED OR RELOCATED BOUNDARY. (Tract No.
2413, Melrose Abbey Area.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
~utton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
iNone
iNone
The Mayor
solution No. 68R-720 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-72l: Council
tion.
Krein offered Resolution No.68R-72l for adop-
Refer to Resolutio
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CORPORA-
TION GRANT DEED AS TO CERTAI ~EAL PROPERTY, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT GRA I DEED AS TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZ-
ING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT ~HEREOF. (Lear Sigler, Inc. - $36,154.25.)
Roll Call Vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCI LMEN:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
None
None
The Mayor declared ~solution No. 68R-72l duly passed and adopted.
PROPOSED L E OF CITY-OWNED PROP Y: The City Manager reported on the proposed
temporary lease of 13 acres 0 City-owned property, located north of Santa
Ana Canyon Road and west of I perial Highway, to HerQ.ert E. Christiansen,
for $50.00 per acre for the p tpose of raising Christmas trees. He noted
that the term of the lease wo Id be for a two-year period with a renewal
option, and provides that the property shall be cleared by the grower. He
pointed out that execution of a lease agreement will effect a saving to the
City of approximately $600.00 for clearing the property, as well as provid-
ing revenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-722: On t , recommendation of the City Manager, Council-
man Krein offered Resolution $. 68R-722 for adoption.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO UN ~L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUIHORIZING THE
LEASING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPE TY TO HERBERT E. CHRISTIANSEN, AND AUTHORIZ-
ING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASIN AGREEMENT FOR SAID PROPERTY.
Roll Call Vote~
o
rn..
\
.~.....
(]
68-690
Cit Hall
- eo elL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1~30 P.M.
AYES:
NOES~
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
!lone
None
R,solution No. 68R-722 duly passed and adopted.
PUlCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: e City Maoager reported on the proposed purchase of an
additional Brush Ch ~per to re!lace a model that was to be retired next year.
He noted that bids are receiv.d for 2 Brush Chippers, and purchase authorized
at the meeting of 0 ~ober 29, 1968, and recommended purchase be authorized
at this time for th additional unit as the price quoted per unit was much
lower than the amou t budgeted.
On the re
that the purchase 0
bidder, Dearth Mach.
Councilman Krein se
endatiOI} of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved
an additi~nal Brush Chipper be authorized from the low
ry Compaqy, in the amount of $3,295.95, including tax.
ded the ~tion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 68R-723:
tion.
ouncilmanKrein offered Resolution No. 68R-723 for adop-
Refer
tTY COUNCIL OF THE C'ITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUfHORIZING THE EXEC ION OF tro[ILITIES AGREEMENT NO. 7UI-39l6 WITH THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR RELOC~~ION OF A l2KV POWER DISTRIBUIION CIRCUIT,
STATION 174+00 TO 1 5+80. (RI~ERSIDE FREEWAY-ROUTE 55/91 INTERCHANGE
TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY INE.)
'1
",1
Resolution No. 68R-723 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
Nbne
None
The Mayor
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY:
injury damages purpo
Lincoln Avenue, berw
or about September 1
and ordered referred
ton, seconded by Cou
laim filed by Franklin and Janice Gorski for personal
tedly resulting from striking a telephone pole on
en Glassell Street and Orange-Olive Road, Orange, on
, 1968, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney,
to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dut-
ci1man Clark. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: laim submitted by Mrs. George E. Heisler, for personal
property damages, he d over from the meeting of November 12, 1~8, was ap-
proved by general co sent of the City Council and ordered referred to the
insurance carrier.
,.........,
Clark offered Ordinance No. 2608 for first read-
CORlESPONDENCE: The foIl ing correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman >rein, seconded by Councilman Dutton:
a. Minute
b. City 0
the proposal that th
for municipal-type s
c. Inter
appreciation for the
46th Annual Business
c. Before
fornia - application
- Orange County Mosquito Abatement District.
Seal Beach - a resolution expressing opposition to
County of Orange build, equip, and staff Fire Stations
ices from the eenera1 fund of the County of Orange.
ional Conference of Building Officials - expressing
ttendance of Alan Orsborn and Homer Wallace at the
eting.
he Public Utilities Commission of the State of Cali-
f Skybus, Inc.
ORDINANCE NO. 2608:
ing.
68-691
Cit Hall Aaah im California-
CIL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
AN ORDIIANCE OF THE CITY OF
14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM NUNI
Portion of Raymond Avenue.)
HEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION
PAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking _
ORDINANCE NO. 2609:
ing.
offered Ordinance No. 2609 for first read-
AN ORDIRANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMI
THERETO SECTION 10812.025, RE
CODE.
HEIM AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.12 OF THE
ING SECTION 10.12.020 THEREOF, AND BY ADDING
TED TO THE SANITATION AND SEWERAGE SYSTEM
ORDINANCE NO. 2610: Councilman Cl tk offered Ordinance No. 2610 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDIIANCE OF THE CITY OF AHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66 7-64 (3) and (4) - M-1.)
ORDINANCE NO. 2611: Councilman Du ~on offered Ordinance No. 2611 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDIMNCE OF THE CITY OF A HElM AMENr>ING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RE1.ATING TO ZONING. (67d8-51 - C-l.)
ORDINANCE NO. 2612: Councilman Sc 'tte offered Ordinance No. 2612 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
IM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
8-104 - C-1.)
ALCOHOLIC BE RAGE LICENSE APPLI~
by the City Manager to the Ci
NS: The following applications were presented
Council for their information:
a. Application sub
Sale Beer & Wine, (Bona Fide
Lincoln Avenue, C-2 zone.
b. Application sub .~ted by Edward A. and Marilynn J. Snow, for
Off-Sale General - Inter Count - Person-to-Person Transfer, for Eddies, at
2817 West Lincoln Avenue, C-l
by Orion-Western Corporation, for New On-
Place), for Pizza Palace, at 1887 West
on said applications.
ORDINANCE NO. 2598: Amended first of Ordinance No. 2598, (Adding Chapter
8.20 - Wild Animals), was defe ted from the meeting of November 12, 1968,
to allow further clarification of the definition of "Wild Animal."
On report and reco ~dation of the City Attorney, Councilman Krein
moved that the amended first r .ding be further deferred to the meeting of
November 26, 1968, for inclusi n of the two recommended amendments to clarify
the term ''Wild Animal." Counc lman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE - CODE OF ETHICS
ment to the proposed ordinance
Municipal Code, relating to a
meeting of November 12, 1968,
of the proposed Code of Ethics
to the requisite "Findings of
noted that the alternative to
it would place the office of t
exigency that has traditional1
The City Attorney reported on possible amend-
_mending Title 1, Chapter 1.01 of the Anaheim
ede of Ethics, which was continued from the
ad suggested that Council consider adoption
by resolution, in order to overcome objections
act" clause in the proposed ordinance. He
~at requirement would be unacceptable, as
. City Attorney in the political arena, an
been avoided by that office~
Council discussion e
of the "Findings of Fact" clau
Code of Ethics by resolution,
to the vote of the people to a
thereby relieving the City Cou
ment and possible prosecution,
$ued, and all Councilmen agreed that inclusion
4 would be unacceptable; that adoption of the
fth a subsequent proposal to submit a measure
end the City Charter to include a Code of Ethics,
oil and the City Attorney of the burden of judg-
ould be preferable.
o
o
~
Cit
'-. '
68-692
CIL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
Councilma Clark req~ested the City Attorney to furnish copies of
Code of Ethics adop by othe. citi~3; Mr. Geisler stated that he would
al50 furnish copies the Gov4rnment Code, pertaining to General Law Citif,.,
to members of the C. Council.
By genera
a Code of Ethics in
tion at a later dat .
ANABEl UNION HIGH SCHOO
Manager reported tha
tentative lea5e agre
Anaheim Union High S
off5 and the teams e
such a lease would b
Fe5tival held Novemb
qualified crowd cont
supervision. He poi
the Agreement would
ment for possible fu
other such high scho
consent, Qouncil instructed the City Attorney to draft
solution form, to be scheduled for Council considera-
ISTRICT ~ PROPOSED LEASE OF ANAHEIM STADIUM~ The City
the Anah~im Union High School District has proposed a
~ent for dhe use of Anaheim Stadium in the event that
hoo1 and Lakewood High School play in the C.I.F. Play-
ect to use that facility. He noted that the terms of
similar to the lease agreement executed for the Band
r 13, 1968, wherein the school district would furnish
01 personnel, with the City furni5hing the required
ted out that if the terms were acceptable to the Council,
nab1e the City to deteDmine the economics of that arrange-
ure negoti,ations for the use of the Stadium as a site for
1 events.
On liLotiofl y CouncilIqan Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, ad-
miqistra't1ve apPtht.{J{, '1Iasgra,ntled to 'negotiate a lease agreement with the
Anahei~:.Uni~n~~n<S'~oo~.bis.tr;i~;t ':for the C. I. F. Playoffs, under the same
terms 'andJ. 'ptoyf~i.~'~;Ji .uthorized fpr the Band Festival. MOTION CARRIED.
PUB I I 0
Foundat.iori', triC:~,,'a
i-l)te,J."na~i.~9.1; tiad,e.,
c~nter, cO~I>'ctal 0
89 ai:!res' 'of i'and 1--r.-i
va:rd, be.tw,een Kat:.ll
,..."
' .. ....~
f
[
I
.,J
,~
I ;
.
granted
U'E' PE Submitted by Incentive Aid
GeoJ;ge P ge, requesting permiss,ion to establish an
. enter with markets, hotels, restaurants, a cultural
ice buildings, and other related uses on approximately
fly described as located west of State College Boule-
and Orangewood Avenues.
anning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-3l3,
nal use permit, subject to the following con~itions:
1. That t e owner of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of 1 pd 64 feet in width for the extension of Lewis Street,
from Pacifico Avenue to Anaheim Boulevard, on an alignment satisfactory to
the City Engineer.
2. That t
Anaheim a strip of 1
along Pacifico Avenu
College Boulevard to
approximately 660.34
for street widening
3. That s
gineering requiremen
Orangewood Avenue an
street grading and p
shall be completed a
plans and spec: .:icat
that a bond in an a
be posted with the
requirements.
4. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be pos ed with the City to guarantee the installation of all
engineering requirem nts, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grad-
ing and paving, drai age facilities, or other appurtenant work along Lewis
Street and said impr vements being installed as required for traffic and
upon demand of the C ty Enginee'r.
5. That t e owner of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $ .00 per front foot along State College Boulevard,
Katella Avenue and 0 angewood Avenue, Pacifico Avenue and Lewis Street,
for street lighting urposes.
e owner of subject property shall deed to the City of
nd 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street
, including corner returns, from the centerline of State
a point approximately 665 feet west and from a point
feet east of Lewis Street to the westerly property line,
urpo:::~s.
reet improvement plans shall be prepared and all en-
s of the City of Anaheim along State College Boulevard,
Pacifico Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,
ving, drai.nage facili ties, or other appurtenant work
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
ons on file in the office _ the City Engineer; and
unt and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
ty to guarantee the installation of said engineering
'~I,+,J
68-693
19 1968 1:30 P.M.
6. Tha t
Anaheim the sum of
Avenue, Orangewood
ing purposes.
7. That the owner 0
Anaheim adequate right-of-way
right-of~ay shall be deeded u
8. That the sidewal
required by the City Engineer
cifications on file in the off
9. That trash stors
approved plans on file with th
10. That fire hydran
mined to be necessary by the
11. That any air-co
shielded from view.
12. That Condition N
shall be complied with prior t
or within a period of 180 days
such further time as the Commis
13. That Condition N
be complied with prior to final
the owner 0 :subject property shall pay to the City of
l5C per fro t foot along State College Boulevard, Katella
Avenue, Pac tico Avenue, and Lewis Street, for tree p1ant-
subject property shall deed to the City of
~r the Orangewood Avenue overcrossing. Said
qn demand of the City Engineer.
~ shall be installed along Katella Avenue, as
~d in accordance with standard plans and spe-
Qe of the City Engineer.
areas shall be provided in accordance with
loffice of the Director of Public Works.
: shall be installed as required and deter-
ef of the Fire Departmento
tioning facilities proposed shall be properly
;. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned,
~he time that the Building Permit is issued
om date hereof, whichever occurs first, or
~on or City Council may grant.
I. 8, 9, 10, and ll, above mentioned, shall
~uilding and zoning inspections.
Appeal from action
by Henry J.K. Jones, Project
hearing scheduled before the
City Planning Commission was filed
on behalf of The Orient, and public
this date.
Correspondence receiv fl from Zero Cold, Inc., 1858 South Anaheim
Boulevard, favoring Conditional Vse Permit No. 1065, was submitted and read.
Mr. Ronald Thompson,
on the east wall of the Council
perty, an~ the uses in the imme
tioning, Mr. Thompson noted tha
City Council under Conditional
ing approximately 55 acres, per
amusement park and commercial-r
continuance of the conditional
a~plication for Conditional Use
October 8, 1968, Conditional Us
for a period of 100 days.
ith the aid of a sectional zoning map,posted
thambers, noted the location of subject pro-
tate vicinity. In answer to Council ques-
the nor~'n8rly .~parcel .previously,approyed by the
.e Permit No. 616, October 6, 1964, compris-
~~ted the establishment of a privately operated
treational facilities. Further, a request for
$e permit was received after the receipt of
lermit No. 1065, and by Council action taken
Permit No. 616 was reinstated and extended
Mr. Thompson briefly
Conditional Use Permit No. 1065
self-contained, the primary veh
arterials surrounding the prope
with completion projected withi
~plained proposed plans of development under
advising that the project would be wholly
4ular circulation provided by the existing
~y; construction to be in various phases,
. five years.
In conclusion, Mr. Th
Planning Commission in granting
son summarized the findings of the City
onditional Use Permit No. 1065.
Councilman Dutton
extension of Convention Way
for a report on the status of the proposed
ly to State College Boulevard.
Mr. Thompson advised
date the General Plan, a Staff
recommending that Pacifico-Conv
the west side of the Santa Ana
southerly to connect with Orang
t with the study presently under way to up-
ort will be forthcoming to the City Council
: ion Way be extended only to Orangewood on
: eway, and that Lewis Street be extended
od to provide needed circulation.
Mr. Maynard Kambak, 14
fornia, President of Facific Co
plicant of Conditional Use Permi
in the area, advised t~atreques
No. 616 was made only after it w
tified.
North Harbor Boulevard, Fullerton, Cali-
nity Centers, Inc., representing the ap-
No. 1065, in discussing prior zoning actions
for reinstatement of Conditional Use Permit
s determined that reinstatement could be jus-
o
o
o
n
i J
'1
)
C1t
68-694
- C UNCIL MINUTES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
Mr . Kamba
for Orange County.
the property cover
which time the con
plained proposed p
clearances obtaine
tained.
advised that four similar proposals have been made
He furthe~ advised that they purchased the option on
d by Conditional Use Permit No. 616 in May, 1966, at
1tional use permit was in effect. He thereupon ex-
ans of development, advising of various approvals and
from the Republic of China and lease commitments ob~
He repor ad that th~ architects for the project were Daniel,
Mann, Johnson and endenhall; the general contractor, Guy F. Atkinson
Company.
Mr. Kamb ~ stated ttat to date in excess of one and one-half
million dollars ha been inve$ted by them in the project and they will
have invested over three million dollars by completion of the first phase;
the total master p an of construction to be in excess of one hundred mil-
lion dollars, the ompletion date to be within a minimum of five years,
and a maximum of e" ht years; five hundred applications have been received
for the two hundre spaces aV4ilable in the first phase.
Mr. Trac
of development the
$60.00 per square
Republic of China.
gross retail sales
the 350-room Orien
As to
cars per day is
eventual impact
The
Mr 0 Odra
that Dr. Magrann wa
ginning of which wa
vised that it appea
new developer appea
cas ions; however, t
project forward. T
ject he did not kno
tent of having know
staging of LhG Orie
Project Director, reported that for the first phase
~n~mum gross retail sales were rated on the basis of
t. This was estimated for one village, that of the
Ultimate plans encompass six villages, and estimated
igures inolude estimated revenue from restaurants and
1 hotel and the 650-room American hotel.
fic impac~, Mr. Price advised that an estimate of 5,000
ected during the first phase of construction, with an
5,000 cars per day in a 24-hour period.
if anyone in opposition wished to be heard.
· Chandler, Attorney representing Dr. Magrann, advised
the originator of the concept of The Orient, the be-
in 1962, at the West Street-Ball Road site. He ad-
ed that whenever a roadblock developed in the plan, a
ed and over the years there have been several such oc-
roughout it has been Dr. Magrann who has carried the
what extent Mr. Kambak has been involved in this pro-
, however, he was certain he was associated to the ex-
edge of the financial expenditure by Dr. ~1.a~r~.~_L ::or the
tal Cultur~al Week.
Mr. Chand er advised that they would not be objecting to subject
conditional use per it except for a letter of intent in their possession
from Pacific Electr c Wire and Cable Company, Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, China,
dated October 10, 1 68, wherein the master lease on 100 shops in the Chinese
section of The Orie t for a period of 60 years was accepted, representing
a total commitment f $2,500,000.00, contingent on The Orient being the
only one deve10pmen involving trade and cultural exchange between the
United States of Am rica and the nations of the Far East. (Said letter
was read in full by Mr. Chandler.)
Reference was made to a presentation by Dr. John Magrann of ap-
proximately 4-1/2 a res of land in the vicinity of State College Boulevard
and Ball Road for u e as a branch of the College of Chinese Culture. Also
reported were firm ommitments received for The Or~ent project and prog-
ress made to date.
Mr. Chand
meeting to determin
could consolidate t
his opinion, if thi
in neither group ac
er suggested the matter be continued to allow for a
if there was any possibility that the two groups
eir act1vities and arrange for one sole project. In
is continued along present lines, it could result
omp1ishing their goals.
68-695
California - e
elL MINtn:ES - November 19
1:30 P.M.
In conclusion, Mr. e
either be denied or, what in h
for a reasonable period of ti
their efforts to their mutual
~ndler requested the conditional use permit
~ opinion would be more reasonable, continued
I to determine if the two parties can unite
~nefit.
Dr. John Magrann, 40 ! South Archer Street, Anaheim, California,
addressed the Council, advisin ! that six and one-half years of time and ap-
proximately $800,000.00 has be h obligated in an effort to make their project
a reality.
Dr. Magrann spoke of ~ongressman Richard T. Hannaws interest in the
new group, which was denied by ~ongressman Hanna, however, in his opinion he
was deeply involved and used h $ prestigious position to obtain governmental
and financial backing overseas
He related events 1e 4ing to the formation of the new group and
prior efforts made to consolid ~e the project.
Dr. Magrann reported
permit would not have been rat
ready to proceed; his objectio
which he felt he originatedo
objection to the new conditional use
had not felt that their project was
to competition, but to their plans
In conclusion, Dr.
permit be denied, and a time 1
for the development of his pro
taken during the six month per'
of commiement, as read by Mr.
in order to proceed.
$rann requested the subject conditional use
,it of six months be granted by the City Council
,ct. He thereupon outlined steps that would be
d, and advised that the writer of the letter
andler, was presently waiting Council action
Mr. Paul King, repre
the Council, requesting the is
a study of the proposal in ord
at 1919 South State College Bo
nting Southern Counties Gas Company, addressed
i be continued to allow their company to make
to determine its effect on their operation
evard.
o
Mr. Kambak, in rebutt a, noted that the issue before the City Coun-
cil was the inclusion of an add tional 35 acres, with a 52-acre parcel cur-
rently zoned for the use.
With reference to Con
vised that Congressman Hanna wo
deavoring to develop such a pro
to see what a tremendous asset
entire County.
, essman Hanna's involvement, Mr. Kambak ad-
~d be receptive and helpful to any group en-
~ct, because he has the vision and foresight
hch a project would be for this City and the
Mr. Kambak explained hat letters of intent were valueless unless
endorsemeBt by government of fo eign exchange is obtained, and immigration
procedures are established.
He questioned how the ~ity Council could assure the fact that this
would be the only complex of th . type in the United States, and thereupon
referred to other similar proje is presently planned in other areas.
Reference was made to Conditional Use Permit Noo 972, for a 300-room
hotel complex at the southwest Qrner of State College Boulevard and Ball Road,
which according to Mr. Kambak's information, was also the site projected for 0
12 industrial buildings. Also oted was Conditional Use Permit No. 610, which
is the apparent site for the Po ynesian Restaurant, and perhaps the College of t",,~.
Chinese Culture. Under present ~oning, Mr. Kambak questioned how construction
of the other project could be s arted in the immediate future. He further ad-
vised that Conditional Use Perm't No.6l6 was in 2frect at the time the option on the
original 52 acres was purchased at a sum of $225,000.00, and stated that the
document specifically notes it 's for the development of The Orient.
Mr. Kambak reported t it ceremonies have been scheduled the last of
this month in Taipei. He also orted that these arrangements would be can-
celled unless zoning is obtaine ,~nd noted the difficulties such a cancella-
tion would create.
o
Cit
Anaheim
1:30 P.M.
68-696
elL MINUTES - November 19
At the req est of Mr. Kambak, Mr. Price briefed the market study,
traffic projection, nd feasibility study.
Councilman Krein askep if Mr. Kambak would furnish copies of the
letters and document tions refe~red to, to the City Council.
Mr. Kambak "eplied in, the affirmative, on condition the City Coun-
cil take the necessa 1 time to read them and render a decision this date.
In answer
abandonment of the e
P. Maddox, City Engi
group and reported i
the second stage of
latter stages would
o Councilm~n Dutton's inquiry regarding the possible
~ension of'Convention Way-Pacifi2o Avenue, Mr. James
eer, advised of several meetings with the present
'was their opinion that in t~e first stage and possibly
evelopment. present roadways would be sufficient. The
equire an Qvercrossing at Orangewood Avenue.
Mr. Price eported that if extension of Pacifico or Convention Way
was desired, they wo Id accommo4ate the Master Plan, and should the overpass
be desired, they wou agree to share in its cost.
In conclusi
idea, Dr. Magrann, ha
Kambak, which negotia
his opinion approval
least a setback, if n
Regarding nditional Use Permit No. 616, Mr. Chandler stated it
was his understandin that an extension of time was granted after the ex-
piration of the perm. . He furtther advised that the original conditional
use permit~as grante after a public hearing, and in his opinion, there was
some cloud of doubt any change in land use permitted outside of a public
hearing. He was of e further opinion than an extension of time was granted
after the fact, aft the expiration of the conditional use permit, and it
was highly questionab e that this was a legal action.
n, Mr. Chandler reported that the originator of the
been through ,every negotiation as described by Mr.
ions are close to culmination. He reported that in
f Conditional Use Permit No. 1065 would result in at
t the death of The Orient idea.
At the
Krein moved that the
groups to meet in an
seconded the motion.
of Council discussion that followed, Councilman
hear:ing be continued 30 days, to allow both
to resolve apparent problems. Councilman Schutte
Following t e motion, and prior to a vote, further discussion was
held relative to the egality of proceedings under Conditional Use Permit
No. 616.
Mr. Kambak
a decision be rendere
Dr. Magrann and his g
It was his further op
project of this magni
groups could unite.
equested that the foregoing motion be withdrawn, and
by the City Council, and further agreed to meet with
oup to determine if there was an area of compatibility.
nion that it was unreasonable and unfair to delay a
ude for 30 days to determine if the two competitive
Mr. Chandle doubted tbe two groups had any area of compatibility,
unless they were on t same level, and if the current conditional use permit
is granted their prom.se to meet would still be in good faith, but doubted
if the effectuation w ld be the same.
Mr. Kambak tated that they were asking the City Council for strictly
a land use, and to re ire a continuance for a meeting would also place them
at a disadvantage, an also place the owner of the property in a position of
requiring negotiations with two groups, prior to finalizing a sale.
'n
, ~
~ "N
Reference wa again made to the extension of Convention Way, and
Mr. Murdoch reported t at the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, as adopted
by the City Council, w uld have to be complied with, until and unless it is
changed by the City Co ncil at a future date. If there is to be a change,
that change would be d ter~ined after ~h? lanrl use ~8 dat~rcinad.
fl
J
1
\"",4
~~,'
",,"";
68-697
Cit
naheim Ca1ifornia-
UNCIL MINUTES - November 19
1:30 P.M.
Dr. Magrann report that the person who can accomplish the project
and has the necessary finan ~ to do so is presently at the Disneyland Hotel,
awaiting an answer. He furt ~r reported that he would need 30 days to verify
statements made by Mr. Kamba '.
Councilman Krein thdrew the motion previously made, and offered
a resolution denying Condit! ~al Use Permit No. 1065, inasmuch as a decis-
ion was insisted upon.
RECESS: Mayor Pebley declared a 4e-hour recess, (6:30 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS (7:30 P.M.): Mayor ley called the meeting to order, all members
of the City Council being pr 1 ntG
Mr. Kambak~ in vie
for a "Yes" or "No" decision
be continued in two weeks, w
determine if there can be a
that they were bound by prio
their announcement and groun
on the 52 acres presently zo
After further disc
denying subject use~ and mov
ion of the City Council be d
Councilman Dutton seconded t
OTHERS PRESENT: City Manage
Geisler; City Clerk, Dene M.
Supervisor, Ronald Thompson.
CONTINUED P LIC HEARING - CONDIT
Horny, requesting permission
to 315 unit) 3-story, planned
mum building height, minimum
per dwelling unit, minimum bu
covered parking spaces; R-3 z
North Street, east of Loara S
The City Planning C
denied said conditional use p
Planning Commission was filed
and public hearing scheduled
plans indicating a reduction
ing continued to this date, t
recommendations.
Mr. Thompson noted
ent1y zoned R-3, the existing
briefed the evidence submitte
mission at their meeting held
concern was obtaining high qu
would not overburden public f
revised plans and departmenta
that if the total number of u
in the acceptable range, and
the revised plans with that s
lof the above action, asked that their ~equest
~e withdrawn, on condition that the hearing
tch he felt was sufficient time to meet and
~mpatible merger of ideas. He further advised
icommitments and would like to proceed with
.reaking ceremonies on the 27th of this month,
~d for this use and presently in effect.
Councilman Krein withdrew the resolution
the public hearing be closed and decis-
two weeks, (December 3, 1968.)
MOTION CARRIED.
Keith A. Murdoch; City Attorney, Joseph B.
.lliams; City Engineer, James P. Maddox; Zoning
AL USE PERMIT NO. 1050: Submitted by Frank
p establish a 333-unit, (subsequently reduced
tesidential development, with waivers of maxi-
ite area per dwelling unit, minimum floor area
lding setback, and minimum number of required
ned property, located on the north side of
teet.
~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-306,
tmit; appeal from action taken by the City
by Harry Knisely, Agent for the applicant,
cl>r November 6, 1968, at which time revised
o 225 units were submitted and public hear-
allow for Planning Commission study and
ne location of subject property which is pres-
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and
to and considered by the City Planning Com-
November 25, 1968. He noted that the primary
]ity construction and a density factor that
Cilities in the area. After review of the
report, the Planning Commission determined
its were reduced to 200, the density would be
pproved the application in accordance with
ipu1ation, to which the petitioner agreed.
Plans and files wer reviewed by the City Council and Mayor Pebley
asked if the applicant or his gent were present and in agreement with the
recommendation of the City PI ing Commission, to which Mr. Knisely, Agent
for the petitioner, respondedffirmative1YG Mayor Pebley then asked if
anyone wished to address the C.ty Council in opposition.
Mr. Ralph Callen, 14 p West Park Avenue, stated that although the
total number of proposed units has now been reduced to 200, he opposed the
application for the following easons: That the R-3 code does not permit
3-story development, which is till proposed; that the 3-story structure
o
o
o
0,',,',',"
r .j
t '.1
I'"
1
~
f '
I
\
C1t Hall Anaheim
68-698
1:30 P.M.
is to be located wi
2 points of ingre55
other onto North St
tary School; and th
ment would use the
that already exists
responsible for 1im
therefore, no hards
C lJNCIL MINUTES - November 19
hin 117 f~et of an R-O, Single-family Zone; that only
and egress are pr.Jvided, one onto Lido Lane, and the.
eet, direCtly across from the Adelaide Price Elemen-
t he estimated 60% to 80% of the cars from the develop-
atter exit" thereby increasing the traffic congestion
He felt that the City and the property owner were
ting the number of access points to the subject parcel;
Ip exists to warrant approval or the application.
Mr. Calle submitted cards purportedly bearing 5ignatures of 450
persons opposing th developmept as proposed at the November 6, 1968, meet-
ing, and additional ~ards bear~ng an estimated 120 to 140 signatures, oppos-
ing the revised pro osal for 225 units.
Councilma Clark asked Mr. Callen if an R-3 development, strictly
according to Code, QuId be ac~eptab1e; to which Mr. Callen replied he would
prerer a lower dens ty, if possible.
Dutton pointed out that the property has been c1a55i-
195'; that the owner has a right to develop in
t Lawson, 1318 Ateca Place, stated that he owned build-
ido Lane, and at 1312 West North Street, and objected
evelopmentt on the basis that there were no other such
~ea. He felt that the development should be limited
u1d effect a lower density factor and require fewer
Ie, 1021 West North Street, stated that he felt R-3
parcel was inappropriate, and cited an instance where
within a few blocks of the subject area,which became
borhood. He noted the drainage problem on North Street,
o sidewalks in some areas.
Conrad, 22i62 West Coronet, stated that he was not a
area, but was interested in the proposed development
on with the La Palma Little League. He expressed the
Ilent, if approved, would be surrounded by some L]pe of
the boys participating in Little League games from
evelopment.
asked Mr. Knisely if he wished to speak in rebuttal
described the proposed development as an adult-only
high-quality construction with a Club atmosphere,
areas, gyms for men and women, and including well-
paces. He noted that the size of the units exceeds
o maximum building height allowed, he noted that the
e liZ-story or 35 fe2t maximum height," and pointed
building would be 30 feet in height and that this
requested under the revised plans; that under R-3
228 units could be developed at this time with no
believe that traffic would be a problem to the area.
felt that sufficient evidence from those present
thereupon declared the hearing closed.
Council di cussion ensued, with Councilmen Schutte and Dutton
indicating approval f the development as revised and recommended by the
City Planning Commiss'on. Councilman Krein felt that it would be a good
development, but not or that particular location; that traffic from the
school and Post Offi was already a problem; and he would favor an R-~
development for the s bject property only if in strict accordance with
Code requirements and site development standards.
Councilma
fied in the R-3 zon
accordance with tha
Mre Ilerbe
ings at B10 and B12
to the proposed R-3
developments in the
to 2-stories, which
carports.
Mr. Bill
zoning on the subje
R-3 zoning was grant
a blight tc the nei
and that there were
Mr. Joseph
property owner in th
through his associat
hope that the develo
enclosure to prevent
running through the
Mayor Pebl
to the opposition.
Mr. Knisel
apartment building 0
featuring recreation
landscaped open air
code requirements.
In regard
Code limitations sta
out that the propose
was the only varianc
Development Standard
variance. He did no
had been
68-699
Cit
UNCIL MINUTES - November 19
1;30 P.M.
RESOLutION: Councilman Dutt * offered a resolution for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 1 $0, as recommended by the City Planning Com-
mission, limiting the total .mber of units to 2000
call vote:
The foregoing reso ition failed to carry by the following roll
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEN~
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton and Schutte
Krein, Clark and Pebley
RESOLutION NO. 68R-725; Cou 4ilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-725
for adoption, denying Condit ~nal Use Permit No. 1050.
Refer to Reso1utio ,Book.
Resolution No. 68R- ~9, adopted October 22, 1968, established the
following fees: (a) $250.00 per dwelling unit for R-l and R-2, 5,000 lots,
(b) $150.00 per apartment un t, (c) $100.00 per trailer space in trailer
parks.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO
USE PEBHIT NO. 10500
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
The Mayor declared
PUBLIC DISC SION - PARK AND REC
increase in Park and Recreati
response to requests of the
ment Corporation, and Betker
Resolution No. 68R-
following procedure for payme
conditional use permits, recl
proceedings are commenced aft
established by Resolution No.
iances, conditional use permi
have commenced their proceedi
and have actually paid their
of $25.00, (provided in Resol
It OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
~i rein, Clark and Pebley
utton and Schutte
one
solution No. 68R-725 duly passed and adopted.
ION IN LIEU FEES: Public discussion of the
In Lieu Fees was scheduled this date, in
: heim Board of Realtors, Fredricks Develop-
onstruction Corporation.
61, adopted October 29, 1968, established the
~: (1) For all tracts, subdivisions, variances,
$sifications and trailer parks, where original
t October 22, 1968, the full amounts of fees
~8R-659. (2) All tracts, subdivisions, var-
$, reclassifications and trailer parks which
&s in the City prior to October 22, 1968,
ees prior to May 1, 1969, shall pay the sum
tion No. 66R-526 of the City of Anaheim.)
Resolution No. 68R- 62, adopted October 29, 1968, amends certain
resolutions in connection wit variances, reclassifications, tract maps,
conditional use permits and t 4iler parks, requiring payment of fees es-
tablished in Resolution No. 6 1-659, provided that the applicant shall not
have completed administrative processing and paid the fee of $25.00, prior
to May 1, 1969.
The City Manager no
a recommendation of the Recre
Citizens Capital Improvements
Chairman of that Sub-committe
committee in making their rec
~d that the increase of the In Lieu Fees was
tion and Cultural Arts Sub-committee of the
Committee, and called upon Mr. Bill Weiss,
to brief the information considered by the
endation.
Mr. Weiss reported t the $25.00 ~~3 per ~we '.ing unit has been
in effect since 1954, when la was selling for less than $4,000.00 per acre,
whereas it now sells for $30, .00 per acre. He briefed the history sur-
rounding the establishment of rk and Recreation In Lieu Fees, noting the
passage of the Quinby Act in 1 55 by the State Assembly, which authorized
such fees. He pointed out th several other cities in Orange County have
adopted such fees since that t.me; notably Westminster ($240.00 per dwell-
ing unit), Cypress ($250.00 pe dwelling unit), and Huntington Beach ($250.00
per dwelling unit),and that ot ~r cities levy fees on new construction, ranging
from $100.00 to $200.00 per dw lling unit.
O.
~"
o
o
Cit Hall Anaheim Cali
ft_,;
L1
1
.-J
f1
t
68-700
- CO elL MINUTES - November 19
1:30 P.M.
He felt t at the City of Anaheim was long overdue in increas:ing
the fee charge for he purpose of park land acquisition and developanent,
noting that 90% of ark costs and expense is now being paid from the General
Fund, instead of by those direttly benefiting. He pointed out that the City
is now 75 acres beh.d the rec<1jJmmended park acreage in the City's Master
Plan; that the Comm'ttee felt that major capital expenditures for improve-
ment of existing pa s should ~ontinue to come from the General Fund.
In answer
fee schedule is bas
the feeling of the
use park and recrea
homes, based on the
permits issued in 0
decreased, and cite
increased.
At the req
revenue derived fro
to June 30, 1968, to
Fund and Bond Fund,
$5,424,718.84, plus
equipment.
Mr. John W
Sub-committee, repor
recreation program t
a Residential Bedroo
each additional bedr
ington Beach has con
even after they adop
four quarters the nu
that City; an increa
as a private citizen
newly-adopted fee sc
Mr. Murdcc
Citizens Capital Imp
nection Fee, which i
Water Connection cha
to determine if pres
resentatives of the
Association meet wit
presentation of resu
Counci 1.
Councilman
fewer parks, such as
to Council questions, Mr. Weiss explained that the new
on PoPu14tion density per dwelling unit, and it was
ittee that residents of apartments and mobile homes
.on faci1i~ies in a ratio equal to that of single-family
ensity faotoro He stated that the number of building
er cities where fees were recently increased has not
three instances where the total number have actually
est of the City Council, Mrs Murdoch reported that
In Lieu Fees paid during the period of June 30, 1954,
a1ed $709,361000; that expenditures from the General
or land aClquisition and CD:-i_ta.'_ improvement, totaled
n additiooal expenditure of $256,429.00 for capital
11oughby, member of the Recreational and Cultural Arts
ed that the City of Fullerton finances its park and
rough the imposition of a Hotel and Motel Bed Tax, and
Tax of $30.00 for the first bedroom, plus $10.00 for
om. He cited figures indicating that the City of Hunt-
istently led this City in issuing building permits,
ed a higher in lieu fee, noting that during the last
ber of building permits issued have totaled 2,676, in
e of 1,096 over the previous four quarters. Speaking
Mr. Willoughby urged the City Council to maintain the
edule, in order to meet future needs of the City.
called attention to other recommendations made by the
ovements Committee; that of increasing the Sewer Con-
being analyzed by the City Staff; and a review of
ges, which is currently under way. These studies are
at charges cover current costs. He suggested that rep-
naheim Board of Realtors and the Building Industry
the City Staff regarding these proposals, prior to
ts of the studies and recommendations to the City
utton asked Mr. Roth if he felt Anaheim should have
ther cities in the area, to which he replied "No."
Mr. Don Ro h, represeating the Anaheim Board of Realtors, addressed
the City Council. H stated that he wanted to see the City of Anaheim con-
tinue an orderly gr th, and cited the fact that many of the surrounding
cities either charge no in lieu fees on new construction or charged nominal
fees, ranging from $ 5000 to $100.00. He expressed concern that developers
would look elsewhere, rather than pay the increased fees established by the
City. He noted that the bulk of undeveloped land in Anaheim is designated
for commercial devel ent, and suggested that this area be investigated
as a possible source for the necessary revenue. He stated that Anaheim has
done an outstanding b in providing park facilities, notiag that the County-
wide average is .88 res of park land per 1,000 population, whereas Anaheim
provides 1.25 acres r 1,000. He called attention to the rising cost of
developing R-1 homes nd felt the increased fees would be passed on to the
purchasers of the R-1 homes. He warned that such increases may lead to
enlarging the role of the Federal Government in housing.
68-701
November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
California -
Mr. John Seymour,
expressed concern that the r
development in the City, and
by resolution recommended th
$50.00 per dwelling unit, an
consisting of representative
Realtors, the Building Indus
be appointed to make recomme
adjust~nts in the feeso
~ce-president of the Anaheim Board of Realtors,
~se in In Lieu Fees would affect the rate of
~eported that the Anaheim Board of Realtors
~ In Lieu Fees be increased ~:o no more than
ifurther recommended that a Blue Ribbon Committee,
lof the City of Anaheim, the Anaheim Board of
,y Association, and other interested parties
' tions three years from now for further possible
In answer to Counc.
a 100% increase in the In Li
ders to be competitive, wher
future development.
questions, Mr. Seymour stated that he felt
Fee would be justified, and would allow bui1-
a 1000% increase would be detrimental to
The City Attorney a
from which the necessary fund
program as planned, to which
supply a portion of the neede
property should pay a portion,
~ed if the Board of Realtors proposed a source
! could be appropriated to continue the park
, . Seymour replied that the General Fund could
funds, and perhaps the developers of commercial
Mr. John Parker add ~ssed the City Council on behalf of the Build-
ing Industry Association, and ~tated that many members opposed the increase
of In Lieu Fees, and were unh ppy that they were not consulted prior to the
adoption of the resolution.
He read the names 0 l::~,~'_.' :~:;rs who had met that afternoon to discuss
the subject as follows: Rich td Hall, Tri-Con Development Company; John
Klug, Pacesetter Homes; Al Jo Json, Johnson Development Company; William
Lusk, J~n D. Lusk and Son; C t Queyrel, Anacal Engineering; Larry Armour,
Armour Company; Doug Holm, Bu ler-Harbour; Robert DeRuff, DeRuff Development;
Nathan Chapel, S& S Construc ton Company; Michael Jones, C. Michael, Inc.;
Loren Covington, Covington Br ~hers; Russell Betker and Hank Fredricks,
Betker-Fredricks Development .mpany; Ed Brattain, Brattain Construction
Company; Robert Solomon, S.l. ~ Development Company; Richard Sant, McCar-thy-
Sant Company; John Griffith, tiffith Bros., Charles Middlebrook, Middlebrook
Anderson; Scotty McMichael, JW. McMichael Company; Jack McLean, Jack McLean
Company; Harry Rinker, Rinker Development Company; Larry Shields, Shields
Development Company; William Ousey, W.I.R. Development Company; Phil Walsh,
R.A. Watt Company; Cliff Hood Jennings, Halterman and Hood; Dan Deutsch,
Danco Land Company; Jack Spaw ~ E.L. Pierce & Associates; Randall Presley,
Presley Development Company; 1iff Erberman, Hirsco Corporation; Robert
Main, Garden Grove Sanitary D strict.
Mayor Pebley left
Council Chambers, 9:05 P.M.
Mr. Parker then rea
of the Building Industry Asso
requesting the City Council t
"In Lieu Fees," and taking t
Chapter of the Building Indus
crease of not to exceed $50.0
multiple or trailer space unit
increased for the next 5 years.
~ resolution adopted by the foregoing members
, t10n, expressing the Industry's position;
~econsider its action in increasing such
position that, !l!hi! time, the Orange County
y Association will ~ actively oppose an in-
per single residential unit and $25.00 per
PROVIDED such 100% increase ~ be further
Council discussion e ued regarding the cost of the In Lieu Fee
to the home owner when spread ver the term of financing, said discussion
pointed out that the prospecti e home buyer would have the use of nearby
park facilities at a relativel small monthly cost.
Mayor
to the Council Chambers, 9:25 P.M.
Mr. Parker stated th ~ he understood the problem that the City
faced in continuing to finance . park program, but did not understand the
formula upon which the increas is based, and suggested investigating other
sources for the necessary fund .
a
in:...
.'
o
Cit Hall Anaheim Calif
~'
,. I
} I,~,
I';
n
I I
'.,
68-702
CIL MlNUI'ES - November 19 1968 1:30 P.M.
Mr. George 1usk, repr~senting Lusk Corporation' a.nd Louis Nohl,
addressed the Counci , indicati~g that the 1000% increase in the In Lieu
Fees for residential development was too great. He stated that the Lusk
Corporation had deve Qpments un~er construction in both Anaheim and Hunt-
ington Beach; that 0 Ce commitm~nts are made, development must proceed, re-
gardless of any cost increases, and that is why building permits have not
yet been affected by the newly tmposed fees. He felt that a decline would
be felt as soon as e isting co~itments have been completed. He noted that
the demand for apart ents is in~reasing as the cost of housing construction
rises; he felt that he City should have contacted those in the building
industry before rais ng fees, and although he recognized the necessity of
finding a source for the needed funds, he objected to placing the full bur-
den on the developer .
Mr. Kit Ke 9502 $reenwlch Street, questioned the theory that
developers, and henc the purch*sers of new homes, should pay the bulk of
the cost of park dev 10pm;nto te noted that many of those who purchase new
homes are already re idents of Anaheim and could be subject to paying the
same fee as many tlm s as they ~hange homes. He felt that the cost of parks
and recreation facil ties should be administered on the same basis as other
City services, and n t be borne disproportionately by a small segment of the
population. He inqu'red what proportion of the ad vcorem tax is allotted
to park development.
The City M
General Fund; and th
and recreation. He
also made to develop
the off-site sewer c
that these services
Mr. Bob Cr
be lowered to compen
the General Fund wit
fees collected would
those areas where it
The City
the necessary future
lation; that monies
park land that has al
provements that are
The City At
from $1.10 to $1.05 1
by ordinance In Lieu
the acquisition and d
and continues to up-d
Mr. Henry F
that his company pres
that none are located
$60.00 per unit; that,
City of Anaheim becau
with apartment develo
his opinion, it is a
that will have a majo
Mr. Weiss a
mittee members took t
arriving at their rec
Lieu Fee ~ates would
and develo!1ment costs
would continue to be
mittee felt that when
provided by the devel
should not be taxed f
committee looked at a
Qager expl$ined that all revenues are placed in the
t no specific charge appears on the .tax bill for parks
ted that there were other specific charges that are
rs, instead of coming from the General Fund, such as
rge and the water connection charge, and pointed out
irectly benefit those who are paying for them.
the Me Michael Company, asked if taxes would
te for the fact that less money will be needed from
the adoption of increased In Lieu Fees, and if the
used specifically for the development of parks in
is collected.
ger pointed out that the increased fees will pay for
and acquisition to keep pace with the expanding popu-
om the General Fund will still be necessary to develop
eady been acquired and will be used for capital im-
cessary.
orney noted that the ad valorem tax rate was reduced
at year by the City Council. He further noted that
ees are placed in a specific fund to be used only for
velopment of parks, and the City of Anaheim has adopted
te a general plan for parks.
edricks, of Fredricks Development Corporation, stated
ntly has over 1,000 apartment units under construction;
in a city which charges an In Lieu Fee in excess of
in the past, many develop~~ats have been built in the
e of the l,ow fees; and that such fees in connection
ments are out-of-pocket expenses to the developer. In
harge that cannot be passed on to anyone else; a charge
effect on the decision of a developer where to build.
ain addressed the City Council, noting that the com-
e problems of the developers into consideration in
mmendation; that the recommended increase in the In
Over approximately 75% of the basic land acquisition
for new parks; and that the remaining 25% of this cost
erived from the General Fund. He noted that the com-
land or other suitable recreational facilities are
per for the residents of the City of Anaheim, they
r this purpose. He reported that the members of the
1 park sites in the City and considered population
68-703
IL MINUTES - November
1968 1:30 P~M. _
need. ia recommending additio 1 land acquisition, notiftl that the City was
$4,000,100.00 behind in this ase of the park program, Which they recom~
mended Ie met by General Ob11 ,tion Bonds.
Kf.yor Pebley expre$
for the in~rmation presented
ter would be taken under advi
Council would take place fall
Manager. the City Attorney, D
tor of Ieve10pment Serviceso
td appreciation on behalf of the City Council
n the discussion, and indicated that the mat-
ment, and further consideration by the City
ing study and deliberations with the City
tector of Parks and Recreation, and the Direc-
Mr. Parker inquired tflt would be possible for representativ'es
of the luilding Industry Asso .ation to sit in on t he&e discussions, to which
the Mayor replied that intere ~ed persons would be welco.e to attend these
sessions.
&lCISS: By IRneral consent
reC886, (10:25 P.M.).
ity Council, Mayor Pebley 'eclared a 10-minute
AlTIR BEClS5: Mayor Pebley
Council being present,
to order, all ..mbers of the City
UEST FOR OS NG GUARD - MATTI
for a cr_ss1ag guard at the i
was continued from the meeti
U MAXWELL SCHOOL: Consideration of a request
rsection of Orange Av~nue and Sherrill Street,
November 12, 1968, for further Council study.
Following brief Cou '.1 discussion, Councilman Clark moved that
Council authorize a crossing . rd at the Sherrill Street crosswalk, as re-
quested, on the basis that all ~arrants have been met and funds are budgeted.
Council_n Krein seconded the tion. MOTION CARRIED.
IMG AT
sut.f t- . r.,.rt, as request
reco.....ins additional signs
to i.,r~e the visibility of t
Drive.
ET AND STONYBROOK RIVE: The City Eag1neer
at the November ~2, 1968 Council me.~~d8,
~d markings to be installed on Dale Street,
e crosswalk at the intersection of Stonybtook
The City Maaager not a that no Council action is necessary, as the
matter \o1ould be handled admini tratively.
Counc(l requested a .port be prepared for the meeting of Nov....'
26, 196&. regardina the possib tity of providing sidewalks on Dale Street.
between Itonybrook Drive and B 11 Road.
ER COUNCIL MEETI The City Manager called Council attention
to ~.... f.t that regular meet! s will fall on December 24, Christmas Eve,
and Deceeer 31, New Year's Iv . and asked if the City Council wished to ob-
serve this scheduleo rollowin 'brief Council discussion it was determined
by general consent ~hat ainee quorum is not expected to be present at the
f"~ce:.,~~r 10, 1968 meet1-., 1;'eg Jar meetings would be held on De-cember 17th
and 24th; however, t~, ...etngQf December 31, 1968, will be adjourned to
the next regular me.tlll, Janu .y 7, 1969.
952: On report and recommendation of the
. Manager, Councilman Krein moved that Change
, consisting of a substitution of concrete
:cified steel building for Parks and Recrea-
s of correspondence from E.J. Tyreman Com-
t no change in c~ract price be authorized.
tiono MOTION caMIED.
ORANGE COUNTY BILLY GRAHAM C
The C:~_ty Manager reported tMt
Billy Graham Crusade A..ociatio
required by the contractor for
heim Stadium from the amount to
lease agreement authorized at t
OCIATION - 1M STADIUM OFFICE SPACE:
i request was received from the Orange County
i, to deduct the cost of the business license
he construction of office space at the Ana-
be paid to the City under the terms of the
e meeting of October 29, 1968.
o
n
a
68-104
Cit
rnia - CO elL MINUTES - November 19
1:30 P.M.
On motion by Councill~n Krein, seconded by Councilman Clark, a
$100.00 r~duction i th~ l~asal agr~~m~nt was authoriz~d, to cover the 'cost
of a business licen e, therebyi reducing the amount to be repaid the City
of Anaheim under th , terms of ,the lease agreement, from $10,000.00 to
99,900.00. MOTION RRIED.
RElQLUTION NO. 68R-1Z4: Counci1maq Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-124 for
adoption, which was ~~.d in f~ll by the City Clerk.
IT
-ih M<!'-
"".-,
&
t~~
Refer
A RESOLUTION OF THE pITY COUNqIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPPORTING DETER-
MINATION OF THE AL CATION OF ~IR SPACE AND DECLARING THE ADVISABILITY OF
A METRO PORT TO SER THE GENE~L AREA OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
ADJOURNMENT :
motion.
Roll
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
~utton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley
None
None
Resolution No. 68R-124 duly passed a""'vted.
mov~d to adjourn. Councilman Schutte secoftded the
ADJOURNED: 11:05
SIGDID
7;(
.;~