69R-681
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-681
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2134
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
LENORE N. KOEBRICH, OWNER and J. ROBERT ALBERT, AGENT
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
All that certain land situated in the State of California,
County of Orange, Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, City
of Anaheim, described as follows:
The West 165 feet of the North 650 feet of the East half
of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B. & M.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the city of Anaheim on
N~V~be{ 3 ,19 ~9 ,notice of which said public hearing
was u y g1ven as requ red by law and the provisions of Title
18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC 69-224
denying said variance
and
WHEREAS, thereafter within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the
City Planning Commission in ~ing said variance and did
set a public hearing thereon to e held on the 2nd day of
December , 19 69 ,at i:3S otclock P.M. in the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim, and not1ce of such public hearing was duly
given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter
18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
-1-
'CT__",,,,,,,",,,,.,,,,,,,_.,___,,,,,,,,,,_,<,,
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the present
zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission in denying said variance be and the same is hereby
sustained.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 2nd day of December, 1969.
ATTEST:
~
! '1,~~ .
ff. A:/~
CI Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF ANAHEIH
)
) SSe
)
"OCNE M. WILLlAMS.Crryq,,JAK 01.1"'[ C'TY OF ANA:HEI,vt,
00 HEREBY CERTIFY TIiA'f tH( .rORtGOLWG' tS THE ORIGIN~
Al OF RESOLUTION NO:. 69R-681 DULY PASSED AND
:[.::Y THE ANAHE.I.M CITY COUNCIL ON Decembe_r ?
. ~ ~~4--~ ~ ____1.969
City C1erkc'
I, DENE fit. WILLIAl\1S, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held.
on the 2nd day of December, 19 69 , by the following vote of
the members thereof: -
AYES: COUNCIL.\-lEN: Dutton, Krein and Pebley
NOES: COUNCIL."1.EN: Schutte
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Clark
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Hayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 2nd day of
December, 19 69 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 2nd day of December,
19 69 .
~ #, ~~~..-/ .
CIT CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
-2-
...__.....A..._.'_"_.~,...,_,_"~",.__ ....