69R-622
-
!.iliSOLli'.i.'IGl. liG 0 69R-622
_.
Po. R.::::;SOLUTIOj; OF T3E CI'i.'Y COU.:CI1:, OF TEE
CITY OF AlJl\.IiLE; G~-ztu~TE~G Ci)I!JI'.~'IGl.;il:..L USl
PEP.l'rI' i.JO. 1138.
'{J1IE?J~A.S " the City P lamling CmnEtission of the City of
7\naheLl\ did receive an application for a conditional use permit
rroffi Raymond S?ehar, 913 Palorra Place, Fullerton, California,
92632, Owner; Presley Development Company, 4500 Campus Drive,
Newport Beach, California, 92660, Agent, Parcel No.3 only, to
establish a 347-unit mobile home park on the following described
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, to wit:
PAECEL ~JO. 3
That portion of allotrClents in Decree of Partition of the
Hancho Canon De Santa l\no. in the County of Orange, State of
California, rendered in Case 110. 1978 of the 17th Judicial
District Court of California, a certified copy of which
was recorded February 8, 1874 in Bod: 28, page 158 of Deeds
in the office of tLe County =-:ecorder of Los lmgeles County,
California; describe~ as follrn;s;
Commencing at tt'-1e northeasterly corner of the land described
in the deed to ele State of California, recorded October 30,
1956 in Book 3693, page 374 of Official Records in ele office
of tlle County Eecorder of said Orange Coun.ty; thence along
tl-:'.e southerly line of a strip of land 100.00 feet wide, as
described in a deed to the Riverside, Santa Ana and Los
Illigeles Railway COLlpany, recorded July 7, 1886 in Book 164,
page 508 of Deeds! records of said Los Angeles County,
"t!1e follo\"lin9 courses; North 880 31' 41" East 787.52 feet
to the bes:inning of a tangent curve concave northerly and
having a radius of 5779.65 feet; easterly along said curve
through a central angle of 00 19' 02;; an arc distance of
32.00 feet to a point in a non.-tangent line, a radial line
through said point bears South 10 47' 21" East, last mentioned
point being also tile Point of Beginning; thence South 10 23'
00 ,; West 1202.21 feet to a point in a non-tangent curve con-
cave northerly, a radial line throug;l said point bears South
50 29 I 18' "llJest and havin~ a radius of 1445.00 feet, thence
easterly along said curve through a central angle of 230 311
15'; an arc distance of 593.20 feet to a point in the north-
erly line of the land described in a deed to Orange County
Flood Control District, recorded February 6, 1939 in Book
930; 9ag~:";J_of Official Records of said Orange County;
tJ."lence 0.10119 the last mentioned northerly line the fOllowins,
courses; North 710 581 03" l~;ast. 938.18 feet to the beginning
of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius
of 1600.00 feet; nortlleasterly along said curve through a
central angle of 180 53' 03 an arc distance of 527.35 feet
to a point in a non-tangent line, a radial line through said
point bears South 360 55' 00" Last, last mentioned point
being also a point in the easterly line of b"le land described
in a deed to Young: recorded in Book 3206, page 194 of
Official :Records of said Orange County;' thence along last
mentioned easterly line the following courses, North 10 30'
56' East 918.56 feet and l~orb'1. 00 28' 56" East 81.03 feet
to a point in the aforesaiCi southerly line of a strip of
-1...
-
-
land 100.00 feet wide, being a point in a non-tangent
curve concave nor'cl1erly, a radial line through said
poin-t bears Sout11 200 30 I 23': East and l1aving a radius
of 5779.65 feet, thence v,-es'cerly along said curve and
said sout.herly line 'chrouS'h a central angle of 180 43'
02 an arc distance of 1088.08 feet to the point of
j)eginninq.
':~\D ':iEiIalli.;.!.S; the City P lanninSf Commission did hold a
public l1earincr at the Ci-cy Hall in t..'"1e City of Anaheim upon
said application on October 6, 1969, notices of which said
public hearing were duly given as required by law and the pro-"
visions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the I-maheim Hunicipal
Code;- and
I'lliEP~AS, said Cormaission, after due inspection, in-
vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing did adopt its Resolution No. PC 69-208, approving
Conditional Use Permit ~',o. 1138 subject to certain conditions
therein set forth; and
-;TI-I:GP..EAS I thereafter, vIi thin tvlenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own n~tion, to review the action of the
City Planning Cornraission in approving said conditional use per-
mit and did tllereupon fix the 4th day of November, 1969, as the
time and the Council Chamber in the City Hall of the City of
]I...na...~eim as the place for a public hearing upon said conditional
use permit, and notices of such public hearing were duly given
as required by lavl and the provisions of 'ri tIe 18, Chapter 18. 76
of the IIDaheim Hunicipal Code; and
WHEP~AS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
lVHEREAS, tile City Council finds, after careful con-
sideration of the recomnlendations of the City Planning Com-
mission and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
that~
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a
condi tional use permit is authorized by the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. 'The proposed use "ttlill not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and develop-
ment of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the
use is adequate to allow tile full development of
the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and high-
'\va:z:7s designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
--2...
--
~-
5. The grantins of the conditional use permit under
the conc,itions iL!f,;csed VJill not be detrin~ental to
the peace, neal th l safe.:ty and g-eneral welfare of
the ci tizerJ.:-;; of the Ci tJ of Z>ncll18il,'.
]"OC;. 'l!HLa::;r'GLj~, L., E.: l:C.;SCi...V::;i- b:J the City Counci 1 0:E
t:ne City of Zmaheim that the action of tile City Planning Com-
mission grantinCj said conai tional use permi.:t be, and the same
is hereby sustained, and blat Conditional Use Pendt No. 1138
be; and the sane is [18reb~/, g-ranteC:: pend tting--parcel 3 only _
the establislnc,en'c of a 347 .. unit mobile 110me parL on the pro-
perty hereinbefore described subject to the following conditions~
1. ~hat this conditional use perrrQt is granted subject to
the completion of ~<.eclassifica.tion No. 69-70-'18.
2. 'l'hat the proposed development shall be in accordance
\dth the requirements of the State 'l'railer Act, and
Ulat plumbing- shall be provided. in order that the
mobile home par],;. will accommodate all trailers and
not be restricted to "California approved trailers~
only.
3. That a 6.,.foot masonry 'i'jall shall be constructed along
.the north and east property lines, and to the rear of
the 2J foot wide; required front landscaped area
frontin~.J on La Pallua Avenue.
4. That Conditions hos. 2 ana ~, above mentioned, shall
be cOnTpliecl wi tl1 prior to final building and zoning
inspections.
5. ;l.'hat the OVlner of subject property shall pay to tl1e
Ci ty of Anaheim the sum of $50.00 per mobile horne space,
to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amoun.t
to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file
wi th the City of 2\.naheim, marJ;:ea Exhibits Nos. 1, 2,
and 3.
'l:he City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such Conditional Use permit for good cause or failure of said
owner; his heirs; successors or assigns to comply with the
1-\.naheiE' l'lunicipal Code and resula. tions and the conditions
herein.
'IlL FOl1l:.:GOrnC Fi"SCLva is approved and signed by
me this 4th day of Uovember " 19G5.
_.&_~---
HE CITY or ANAllEIIl
I,TTES'l',
~'
, k.~' /
CIT. CLERICbY ~~AH;;;fM
..3..
-
~
STATE OF CI~IFOffi~IA
COUN'I'Y OF ORAl'JGE
CITY OF Al-J.AHEHl
55
It DENE JYi. 1HLLIP...liS, City Clerk of the City of lmaheim,
do hereby certify tllat the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th
day of ~ovenllier; 1969, by the following vote of the n~mbers there-
of
AYBS.
com'JCILiilEN" Dutton, I(rein, Schutte, Pebley
and Clark
COUlJCILIJ1EN; None
dOES
l\BSEliT. COUNCILI.1EN.. hone
1':J:-JD I }'URTHE}"( CERTIFY that the JYiayor of e1e City of
Anaheim approved and signed said. resolution on e1e 4th day of
:r:~ovember 1 1969.
In (IH'I'NESS ~'i}I:E;FJ.;OF; I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 4th day
of November, 1969.
~.
.___ ___.~ ~~ ~ J ___
CIT CLEffi< OF THE CITY OF N'JAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
69R-622 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on Nov-
ember 4, 1969. ~
hr~~
City Clerk
-
..4..