84R-150
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-150
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2499 (REHEARING).
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit
from GLORIA H. MILLER and DOROTHY H. HURLEY, owners, and G.G.P.
ASSOCIATES, INC., agent, to permit a 79-unit senior citizens'
apartment complex on certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 1:
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 11 WEST IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPT THE WEST 132 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 328 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THE EAST 262.30 FEET THEREOF; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said application at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, notices of which public hearing were duly given as re-
quired by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC83-2l4 granting, in
part, Conditional Use Permit No. 2499; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion,
caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a duly
noticed public hearing; and
'''-'''
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to
be heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider
the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did find, after careful
consideration of the action of the City Planning Commission and
all evidence and reports offered at said public hearing before
the City Council, that all of the conditions and criteria set
forth in Section 18.03.030.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are
not present and denied Conditional Use Permit No. 2499 by its
Resolution No. 84-11 on January 10, 1984; and
*11.. "'~"~" ",,'.;-. -."'____.~_.....~
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
the applicant requested and was granted a rehearing by the City
Council on said conditional use permit application; and
WHEREAS, at the time fixed for said rehearing,m the
City Council did hold and conduct such rehearing and did give the
applicant and all other persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did
consider the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find, after careful
consideration of such evidence and reports offered at said
rehearing, that all of the conditions and criteria set forth in
Section 18.03.030.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are not
present for the following reasons:
1. That the proposed use will adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located; and
2. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the
use is not adequate to allow the full development of the proposed
use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the
peace, health, safety, and general welfare; and
3. That the granting of the conditional use permit would
be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare
of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the previous action of the City Council
denying said conditional use permit be, and the same is hereby,
affirmed for the reasons hereinabove specified, and that the
request of said applicant to permit a 79-unit senior citizens'
apartment complex on the hereinabove described real property be,
and the same is hereby, denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to City Council
Resolution No. 79R-524, the time within which judicial review of
the aforesaid decision must be sought is governed by the
provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted
City Council of the City of Anaheim this l7t day of April
M
ASSISTANT
ATTEST:
CI~;4~EIM
JLW: fm
2509M
5/8/84
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 84R-150 was introduced and adopted
at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of
Anaheim held on the 17th day of April, 1984, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
-
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt and Pickler
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay and Roth
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 84R-150 on the 17th day of April, 1984.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 17th day of April, 1984.
LEONORA N. SOHL, ASSIST. CITY CLERK
BY
~~1fX
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 84R-150 duly
passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on April 17, 1984.
LEONORA NO. SOHL, ASSIT. CITY CLERK
~~I?{/i:<<
BY
-