84R-486
r~
~
.#"""\
MSI, .NC.
POOR IRIGINALA rESOLUT ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
DOCUMENT OF, ANAHEI FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE
. ZO~ING MA REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM M ~ICIPAL ~ODE SHOULD BE AMENDED AND
THAT THE OUNDARIE$ OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD
BE CHANGE. (REHEARING)
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-486
WHEREAS, ~he City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did hold a ~.bliC he_.ring in Reclassification Proceedings
No. 84-85-6 to cons 6er an amendment to the Zoning Map referred to
in Title 18 of the aheim Municipal Code, and to consider a change
in the boundaries 0 the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and
described and, at s.id hearing, did receive evidence and reports
from persons intere.ted therein and from its staff~ and
WHEREAS, r.ithin a period of forty (40) days following
said hearing, the P,anning Commission did duly adopt a resolution
containing a reportiof its findings, a summary of the evidence
presented at said h,aring and granted the proposed amendment~ and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested partyior the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said rlanning Commission action~ and
WHEREAS, ~t the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City C~uncil did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all petsons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receie evidence and reports, and did consider the
same~ and
WHEREAS, ~he City Council did find and determine that the
property and are prpposed to be changed from the zone or zones in
which it is now sit~ated to a different zone, as hereinafter set
forth, was more sui~able for the zone or zones in which it is now
incorporated and th~t a change of zone should not be granted and,
therefore, adopted ~ts Resolution No. 84R-434 denying said proposed
amendment~ and
WHEREAS, ~hereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
the applicant reque~t. ted, and was granted, a rehearing by the City
Council upon such r~uest~ and
.,........
WHEREAS, tit the time and place fixed for said rehearing,
the City Council di~ hold and conduct such rehearing and did give
all persons interesjt.1ed therein an opportunity to be heard, and did
receive evidence anf1 reports, and did consider the same~ and
~
.~.
,,,,.......,
WHEREAS, ~pon such rehearing and further consideration,
the City Council do~s find and determine that the Zoning Map
referred to in Titl~ 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code should be
amended and that thd property hereinafter described should be
excluded from the zqne or zones in which it is now situated and
incorporated in the 'zone and zones as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THER~tORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim tha~ the City Council does hereby declare and
indicate its intent~on to amend the Zoning Map of the City of
Anaheim and to rezoqe and reclassify the following described
property, situated ~n the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, to w~t:
PARCEL 1 OF PAj:CEL MAP, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE P CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 8 PAGE
43 OF PARCELS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY,
into the "CL" COMME~C:IAL, LIMITED ZONE of the City of Anaheim,
subject to the follqwing conditions:
1. That the qwner of subject property shall submit a letter
reqUestin~.termination of Variance No. 3244 to the
Planning ~partment.
2. That prio' to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning
subject p perty, Condition No.1, above-mentioned, shall
be comple ed. The provisions or rights granted by this
resolutio shall become null and void by action of the
Planning ommission unless said conditions are complied
with with'It one year from the date of this resolution, or
such furter time as the Planning Commission may grant.
3. That subj~ct property shall be developed substantially in
accordanc~ with plans and specifications on file with the
City of Aqaheim marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
4.
That the !Ollowing uses shall not be permitted on the
premises, land the owner of the property shall record a
covenant ~~ainst the property in a form approved by the
City Atto~ney's Office prior to introduction of an
ordinance ]rezoning the subject property restricting the
use of th~ premises to exclude the following uses: video
arcades, ~iquor stores, saunas and turkish baths, pool
halls and !billiard parlors, bus depots, butcher and
poultry s~Ops, mortuaries, used furniture stores, bingo
parlors, ~nd beer bars.
.-...
-2-
84-85-6
L j
",......
~
,......
S. That vehi~~lar access from the property shall be limited
to right ~~rns only and that prior to introduction of an
ordinanceltezoning the subject property the owner of the
property ~ball record a covenant in a form approved by
the City ~ttorneY'$ Office so restricting egress.
BE IT FUR;$ER RESOtVED that the City Council of the City
of Anaheim does her by find and determine that the adoption of this
Resolution is expresly predicated upon applicant's compliance with
each and all of thei~onditioms hereinabove set forth. Should any
condition or any pa*t thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgme+t of any court of competent jurisdiction, then
this Resolution, an4 any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
City
THE FOREG~JNG RESO~UTION is approved and adopted by the
Council of therCity of Anaheim this lL;h day of December, 1985.
~~~-
MA OR OF THE CI' F AN' ElM
A:T/j "'- ~ rs-~
~ OF THE cth ~F ANAH~
JLW:kw
Z12SU
0102SS
~.
-3-
84-85-6
r--
..-",
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEORORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No.! 84R-486 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of ~he City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 11th day of December, 19'4, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickler and Overholt
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Roth
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that t~e Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 84R-486 on thf 11th day of December, 1984.
IN WITlESS WHEREOF, I have h,reunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 11th dar of December, 1984.
t
~~,~
C1 CLERK 0 ]I; CITY ANA 1M
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the origina~ of Resolution No. 84R-486 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City touncil on December 11, 1984.
~~~CL~
,
\