84R-471
r
-
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-471
A RESOLUTI~~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIMi~RANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO . 2628 .
r-"
WHEREAS, t~e City P~anning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive ~r app1ic~tion for a conditional use permit
with a waiver of cert~in provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code
from Barbara A. Koon~~ et a1., owners and CALIFORNIA REFRIGERATED
SERVICE, Newport, to. permit a truck repair facility upon certain
real property locate. within the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, legally aescribed as:
ALL THAT PORTIotr OF VINEYARD LOT "B2" AS SHOWN ON A
MAP OF ANAHEIM, RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGES 629 AND 630
OF DEEDS, RECORi"~ OF LOS. ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
LYING EASTERLYf THE EA$TERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN
STRIP OF LAND 6~00 FEET IN WIDTH DESCRIBED AND
EXCEPTED IN THEipEED TO THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY, A UTAH'CORPORAT!ON, RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1955
IN BOOK 2948, PAGE 207 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS: and
WHEREAS, t~e City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said ap~~ication at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, notices of .hich public hearing were duly given as
required by law and the provi$ions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code: and
WHEREAS, s.~d Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and st'~ies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due considerat!on of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did adtpt its Resolution No. PC 84-215 granting
Conditional Use Perm.t No. 2628: and
WHEREAS, t.ereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party ~r the City Council, on its own motion,
caused the review of aaid Planning Commission action at a duly
noticed public heari~9; and
. --..,
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Co,ncil did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all per$ons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports: and
"
WHEREAS, t~e City Council finds, after careful consi-
deration of the reco*~endations of the City Planning Commission
and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that:
l I
r--
.-"
I. The propos~d use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authori~ed by the Anaheim Municipal Code.
,,,.-...,,,
2. The propos~d use will not adversely affect the adjoin-
ing land uses and th~ growth and development of the area in which
it is proposed to be located.
3. The size a~d shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow th~. full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detriment.l to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burd,n upon the streets and highways designed and
improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. The granti~g of the conditional use permit under the
conditions imposed wJ1I not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general w~lfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
AND WHEREA~~ the City Council does further find, after
careful consideratio~of the action of the City Planning
Commission and all etidence and reports offered at said public
hearing before the C!ty Council regarding said requested
waiver(s), that all ~f the conditions set forth in Section
18.06.080 of the Ana.eim Municipal Code are present and that said
waiver(s) should be granted, for the following reasons:
I. The varian~e(s) will not cause an increase in traffic
congestion in the im*ediate vicinity nor adversely affect the
adjoining land uses: and
2. The granti~g of the variance(s) under the conditions
imposed will not be .~trimental to the peace, health, safety or
general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREfPRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the
action of the City Planning Commission granting said conditional
use permit be, and t~e same is hereby, affirmed and that
Conditional Use Permit No. 2628 be, and the same is hereby,
granted permitting a truck repair facility on the hereinabove
described real propetty with a waiver of the following provisions
of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
.....-..,.
SECTIONS 18.06. $0.0222, - Minimum number of parking spaces
18.06. 0.031 (149 spaces required: 18 spaces existing
AND 18.61. 6.050
subject to the follo~ing conditions:
-2-
r
.-...
I. That curbs and gutters shall be repaired along Sycamore
Street as required by the City Engineer and in
accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the City Engineer.
~,
2.
That a tratific sign~l assessment fee equaling the
difference between the industrial and commercial
assessment fees shaJ..I be paid to the City of Anaheim in
an amount as determ~ned by the City Council.
3. That the owper of sUbject property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim a fee for street lighting along Sycamore
Street and Wilhelmina Street in an amount as determined
by the City Council.
4. That fire ~prinklers shall be installed as required by
the City FJre Marshall.
5. That the dt~veway shall be redesigned to accommodate ten
(10) foot r~dius curb returns as required by the City
Traffic Eng~neer.
6. That all l~pkable pedestrian and vehicular access gates
shall be eqpipped with a "knox box" device to the
satisfactibh of the City Fire Marshall and City Chief of
Police.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided and
maintained in accor~ance with approved plans on file
with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division.
8. That the ptoposal shall comply with all signing
requirements of the ML Zone, unless a variance allowing
sign waivets is approved by the Planning Commission or
City Council.
9. That there shall be no outdoor storage of or work
vehicles ot vehicle parts.
10. That subje~t property shall be developed substantially
in accorda~ce with plans and specifications on file with
the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. land 2.
i'''-''"
ll. That Condition Nos. l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and lO,
above-menti~ned shall be completed within a period of
ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution.
12. That this ~ermit shall expire at the end of five (5)
years, on December 4, 1989.
-3-
r~
..-..
"......,
BE IT FUR~ijER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the
conditions hereinabQve set fQrth. Should any such conditions, or
any part thereof, b..declare~ invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of a~y court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approval$ herein contained, shall be deemed
null and void.
City
THE FOREG~~NG RESOtUTION is approved and adopted by the
Council of the~ity of Anaheim this 4th day of December, 1984.
~~~
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
~,,-"/lS+U-,
CITY CLERK OF' THE ctTY OF AN!HEIM
2€)22U
12/1A/.S4
~
"
-4-
l ~
,--.
~
STArE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUJiTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY 01' AlWIEIM )
I, LEQlORA N. SOHL, City C1et~ of the City of ~heim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No.!f4R-471 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meetina provided by law, of t~e City C~nc11 of the City of Anaheim held on
the 4th day of December, 1984, by the following vote of the members thereof:
~
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT'
!
COUNCIL MEMBERS: t 1 None
AND I PURTHER certify that t~. Mayor of the City of Anaheim si~d said
Resolution No. 84R-471 on tht4th day of December, 1984. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h,reunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 4th day"f December, 1984.
~e{ ~~
.. OF THE CITY dF d~tM
(SEAL)
I, LEOI~ N. SOHL, City c1eIt of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the fOftgoil18 is 'theorigina 'of Resolution No. 84R-471 duly passed and
adopt_ by the Aqaheim City C~unci1 on December 4, 1984.
~'i '/l~
CITY CLERK
l