Loading...
84R-392 r , ~ ; RESOLUTIN NO. 84R-392 A RESOLUT~.'.N OF THa. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~IDENYING VARIANCE NO. 3398. ~. WHEREAS, .ter a r~quest for variance by SAID LAHIDGANI, ET AL., ners, and STERLING CARLSON, agent, to construct a 35-unit partmen~ project with waivers of certain provisions of the heim Mu~icipal Code, was received, a public hearing before the anning qommission of the City of Anaheim was held upon due and p 'per not~ce, a result of which Variance No. 3398 was granted co~ ring tha following described property: PARCEL 1: THE NORTH j~05 FEET OF THE WEST 120 FEET OF THE EAST 221. '.~ FEET OF! THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST UARTER ~F THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION NTY-FOU~, TOWNSHIP FOUR SOUTH, RANGE ELEVEN WE , S.B.B. & M., AS SHOWN ON A HAP RECORDED BOOK 51, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, REC DS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL HE NORT~ 205 FEET OF THE EAST 221.32 WEST 4~2.65 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST ITHE NOR'lfHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ISECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 E RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A D IN BodK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS ,DS OF O~GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; and PARCEL FEET OF T QUARTER 0 QUARTER 0 WEST, IN MAP RECO MAPS, REC WHEREAS, ~ereafte~, within the time prescribed by law, an interested party !~r the Ci!ty Council, on its own motion, caused the review of said ~~anning Qommission action at a public hearing noticed and held as ~rescribed by law and, as a result thereof, the City Council do~ hereby make the following findings: 1. That ther~ no special circumstances applicable to the property which do ndt apply to other property in the same vicinity and zone. ~ 2. That striqt applic~tion of the zoning code does not deprive the propertyjof privi'leges enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity aq4 zone. NOW, THE~ORE, BE ,IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim ithat said Variance be, and the same is hereby, denied. r r .~ BE IT FUR~ER RESOLVED that, pursuant to City CouDcil Resolution No. 79R-$4, the time within which judi6ial review of the herein decision Joust be sought is governed by section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. .~ , THE FOREGd]jNG RESO~UTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the ~ity of ~aheim th~'S 2 day o~ Oct , 1984. , I' . -~ ' , ~r-- ' MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ! I ~4~. C . R .. OF nB. ..... 0 AN$nM l105U ll/Ol/8'4 I ,: ~ -2- I f r'" ,....... STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.,84R-392 walB introduced and adopted at a regular meetina provided by law, of ~he City Council of the City of Anah~im held on ~ the 2nt day of October, 1984, by the following vote of the members thereof: , AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: t , Kaywood, Bay, Overholt and Roth NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT : COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 84R-392 on th~ 2nd day of October, 1984. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h~reunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 2nd day of October, 1984. ~e! --;r~ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOML, City C1etk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the origina). of Resolution No. 84R-392 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on October 2, 1984. ~'h~~ , f