84R-299
("
,
~,
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-299
A RESOLUTI~N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIMjGRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2525.
r~'
WHEREAS, t~e City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive .n applic.tion for a conditional use permit
with a waiver of cert.~. in provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code
from HOLLY W. DAVIDS~N and WC$ INTERNATIONAL, owners, and ORANGE
COUNTY STEEL/SALVAGEt INC. and GEORGE ADAMS, agents, to expand a
resource recovery an~ recycling operation including an automobile
dismantling business'with wholesale and retail sales of auto parts
upon certain real pr~perty located within the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, St_te of California, legally described as:
THOSE PORTIONS iF.. LOTS 11, 12, AND 13 INCLUSIVE OF
IIORANGE GROVE A.RES NO. 211 AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK 7 AT PA E 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS OF SAID
ORANGE COUNTY, tYING SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
LAND CONVEYED ~ THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED
RECORDED MAY 24~ 1963 IN BOOK 6561, PAGE 239 OF
OFFICIAL RECORD$.
LOTS 31 AND 32 <l>F IIORANGE GROVE ACRES NO. 211 AS SHOWN
ON A MAP RECORDt~ IN BOOK 7, PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECORDS ot ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREfROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOTS CONVEYED
TO THE COUNTY ot ORANGE BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 23,
1922 IN BOOK 43~, PAGE 202 OF DEEDS.
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH[ HALF OF POMELO DRIVE, AS
SHOWN ON THE MA' OF IIORAIIGE GROVE ACRES NO. 211,
RECORDED IN BOOi7, PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORAN.~,.. COUNTY,. CALIFORNIA, ADJOINING LOTS
11, 12, AND 13F SAID ORANGE GROVE ACRES NO.2, ON
THE SOUTH AND T T PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID
POMELO DRIVE AD OINING LOTS 31 AND 32 OF SAID ORANGE
GROVE ACRES NO. '2 ON THE NORTH, ABANDONED AND VACATED
BY RESOLUTION or THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE
COUNTY ON MARCH 29, 1930, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH
WAS RECORDED MAtCH 31, 1930 IN BOOK 972, PAGE 164 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
~,
LOTS 14 AND 15 $F ORANGE GROVE ACRES NO. 2 AS SHOWN ON
A MAP RECORDED tN BOOK 7, PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, IN THE OFftCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFOR$IA, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF
POMELO DRIVE, ~~OINING, VACATED BY ORDER OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ~r ORANGE COUNTY, A COPY OF WHICH WAS
RECORDED MARCH 31, 1938, IN BOOK 932, PAGE 164 OF
OFFICIAL RECORD$.
I I
r~'
'1
"..........,.,
EXCEPTING THERE,ROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED OF
THE STATE OF CAJ,.,IFORNIA RECORDED ON FEBRUARY 24, 1956
IN BOOK 3410, P~E 124 AND DEED TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RECO~ED ON APRIL 17, 1964, IN BOOK 7008,
PAGE 52, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, tpe City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said aPt'~ication at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, notices of . hich public hearing were duly given as
required by law and ~he provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, s~id Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and stUdies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did ad~pt its Resolution No. PC84-l06 granting
Conditional Use perm!t No. 2525; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party ~r the City Council, on its own motion,
caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a duly
noticed public heari~g; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Co~ncil did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all per,ons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after careful consi-
deration of the reco,_endations of the City Planning Commission
and all evidence and'reports offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by the Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The propos.d use will not adversely affect the adjoin-
ing land uses and the growth and development of the area in which
it is proposed to be located.
3. The size a.a shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow th. full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detriment.l to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and g.neral welfare.
.-""
4. The traffi~ generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and
improved to carry th~ traffic in the area.
5. The granti~, of the conditional use permit under the
conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general w.lfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
-2-
L "!
r'
~
I
~
AND WHEREA~, the City Council does further find, after
careful consideration of the action of the City Planning
Commission and all e~idence and reports offered at said public
hearing before the City Council regarding said requested
waiver(s}, that all of the conditions set forth in Section
18.06.080 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are present and that said
waiver(s} should be granted, for the following reasons:
1. The varianpe(s} will not cause an increase in traffic
congestion in the im~ediate vicinity nor adversely affect the
adjoining land uses; and
2. The grantipg of the variance(s} under the conditions
imposed will not be ~etrimental to the peace, health, safety or
general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THERErpRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the
action of the City pLanning Commission granting said conditional
use permit be, and t~e same is hereby, affirmed and that
Conditional Use Perm~t No. 2525 be, and the same is hereby,
granted permitting e~pansion of a resource recovery and recycling
operation including ~n automobile dismantling business with
wholesale and retail, sales of auto parts on the hereinabove
described real prope~ty with a waiver of the following provisions
of the Anaheim Munic~pal Code:
SECTIONS l8.06.p30
AND 18.61.066.030
Required improvement of
parking areas. (Full pav-
ing required; gravel and
oil proposed
subject to the follo~ing conditions:
1. That this ponditional use permit is granted subject to
the completion of Re~1assification No. 83-84-15, now pending.
2. That trash, stoeage areas shall be provided in accordance
with approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and
Sanitation Division.
3. That drain~ge of subject property shall be disposed of
in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
,.-..."
4. That the p~oposal shall comply with all signing
requirements of the ~L Zone, unless a variance allowing sign
waivers is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council.
5. That subjept property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with p~ans and specifications on file with the City
of Anaheim marked Ex~ibit No.1 (Plan A): provided, however, that
subject property maybe developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 2 (Plan B) upon a finding by the City Attorney's
Office that the petitioner has submitted adequate proof for
vehicular access and parking rights on abandoned Newkirk Road.
-3-
.'-'
~
~
6. That all outdoor storage areas, except as otherwise
approved in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 1703, shall
be enclosed with chadn link fencing interwoven with redwood or
cedar slats, solid ~sonry block walls and/or an earthen berm or
any combination ther~f; the height of said enclosure to fully
screen said outdoor ~torage.
7. That the o~er/petitioner shall pay the cost
(approximately $3,33~.00) of installing a barricade, rumble strips
and signs in Fronter~ Street to control traffic access.
8. That Condi~ion Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, above-
mentioned, shall be completed within a period of ninety (90) days
from the date of this resolution.
9. That this conditional use permit shall be effective only
upon the approval oft 'the use by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency.
10. That no oujt!door sto'rage shall project above the
enclosure fencing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated uponappl!i,cant's cPlnpliance with each and all of the
conditions hereinaboMe set forth. Should any such conditions, or
any part thereof, be: declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of anv court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed
null and void.
THE FORE~G RESOLUTION is approved
City Council of the ~ity of Anaheim this 31st
by the
1984.
AL~ '/tsdL
CrTY CLERK OF THEC~ OF ANAHEIM
JLW: fm
3032M
9/10/84
.~..
-4-
L J
('
~
STATEQF ~FORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY Of AliAHEIM ) I '
I, LEo,ORA N. SOHL, City Cl~' of the Gity of ~im, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 84R-299 was introduced and adopted at a.' regular
meeti. provided by law, of · e Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of Anaheim held on
the 31st day of July, 1984, . the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERs:1 f Xaywood, Bay, Overholt, Pickler and Roth
I
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
i
AND I FURTHER certify that ~ Mayor of the City of Anah.' eim signed said
Reso1e'tioll. No. 84R-299 on ~ 31st day of July, 1984.
!
IN WI'lWESS WHEREOF, I have ~eunto se~my hand and aff~xed the sea~ of
City of ADaheim this 31st ~ of July, 1984.
the
..~~~
dITY CLlJuc QF THE CITY, OF ANAHEIM
( SML)
I, LEON. ORA N.. SOHL.., City C~.,.....k of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify th.at
the fcego1na i8, the oriai .. of Resolution No. 84R-~9 duly passed and
adopt~ by t_ .Anaheill City.(]ounci1 on July 31, 1984. . ;
! .
~<L~
CITY CLERK
,.".. ....
/
)
f