80R-359 RESOLUTION NO. 80R-359
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO.
108, EXHIBIT E.
WHEREAS, on August 3, 1971, the Anaheim City Council
approved Area Development No. 108, Exhibit "D," Modified, regarding
vehicular access generally bounded by Kraemer Boulevard on the east,
La Palma Avenue on the north, and the Riverside Freeway on the
south; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 1980, the petitioner (M. W. Ranill,
Realty World- Ranill Realty) requested amendment to Area Development
Plan No. 108 to delete a portion of La Mesa Avenue located in unin-
corporated Orange County, west of White Star Avenue and north of the
Riverside Freeway, in order to allow development of an industrial
complex; and
WHEREAS, said requested amendment to Area Development Plan
No. 108 has heretofore been given the designation of Exhibit "E" to
said Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that said
proposed amendment to Area Development Plan No. 108, Exhibit "E" be
denied; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing at the
Council Chambers of the Anaheim Civic Center on August 12, 1980, at
3:00 p.m., notice of said hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed
area development plan amendment and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after due investigation and
study, made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration
of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. That the subject property is an irregularly- shaped parcel
of land consisting of approximately 80.0 acres bounded on the north
by La Palma Avenue, on the east by Kraemer Boulevard, and on the
south and west by the Riverside Freeway.
2. That on June 28, 1971, the Planning Commission recommended
adoption of Area Development Plan No. 108, following a public hearing,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law.
3. That Area Development Plan No. 108, establishing a col-
lector and local street circulation pattern for subject area, was
approved by the City Council on August 3, 1971. Subject plan
extended Blue Gum Street, retained White Star Avenue, added Armando
Street, abandoned Canal Street and provided a new frontage road
(La Mesa Avenue) .
-1-
4. That La Mesa Avenue is presently improved from Blue Gum
Street easterly to the Anaheim City Limits and serves an existing
industrial complex.
5. That the portion of La Mesa Avenue being considered for
deletion by this amendment is located between the Anaheim City
Limits and the southerly terminus of White Star Avenue. Said portion
of White Star Avenue has not been improved and the adjacent property
to the north has not been developed.
6. That other property owners in the immediate area have
developed their properties in accordance with Area Development Plan
No. 108, as approved in 1971, with a frontage road (La Mesa Avenue)
and that deletion of La Mesa Avenue would create hardships for those
properties with existing freeway exposure.
7. That the City Council has determined that Amendment to
Area Development Plan No. 108, Exhibit E, is inappropriate at this
time and no change should be made to the existing plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED that the City Council has
reviewed the proposal to amend Area Development Plan No. 108, encom-
passing an irregularly- shaped parcel of land consisting of approxi-
mately 80.0 acres bounded on the north by La Palma Avenue, on the
east by Kraemer Boulevard, and on the south and west by Riverside
Freeway, to delete the portion of La Mesa Avenue located in unincor-
porated Orange County west of White Star Avenue and north of the
Riverside Freeway in order to develop certain property with an
industrial complex; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on
the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumula-
tive adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration; that no sensitive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the
petitioner indicates no individual or cumulative adverse environ-
mental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating
the foregoing findings is on file in the Anaheim City Planning
Department.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to the foregoing
findings, the City Council does hereby deny an amendment to Area
Development Plan No. 108, Exhibit "E" and orders no change to the
current Plan on the basis of the foregoing findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 12th day of August, 1980.
w
AY'R OF THE C ' OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
0► /
CIT CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JLW: fm
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 80R -359 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 12th day of August, 1980, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 80R -359 on the 12th day of August, 1980.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 12th day of August, 1980.
CI Cr RK OF THE CI OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I,,LINtA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 80R -359 duly passed and adopted
by the Anaheim City Council on August 12, 1980.
)
CITY CLERK