69R-589
IlliSOLUTION NO. 69R-589
A IlliSOLUTION OF 'l'HE CrfY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1135
~'JHI:;REAS, tne City Planning Commission of the City of
Mlaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit
from J. Earl Talcott, 1781 West Rornneya Drive, Suite F, Anaheim,
California, Owner; Daniel H. Ninburg, M.D., 1781 West Rornneya
Drive, Suite F, Anaheim, California, Agent, to establish a
building having a height in excess of 75 feet (Height 190 feet)
on the following described property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, to wit:
Lot 1 of that portion of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10
West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, in the City
of Anaheim, as shown on a map recorded in book 51, page 10,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, as shown
on a licensed surveyors map recorded in book 1, page 55 of
Records of Survey; in the office of the County Recorder of
said Orange County.
AND WHEIlliAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon
said application on September 22 , 19 69 , notices of
which said public hearing were duly g1ven as required by law
and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, in-
vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing did adopt its Resolution No. PC 69-199
arproving Conditional Use Permit No. 113S
.5ubjQct to certain condir;nns rhprp;n RPr forrh
and
HHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
tne aate of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action of the
City Planning Commission in ripprmr; ng said conditional use
Dermi t and did thereupon fix the .." _.L.. day of r\,......,.,h,....j,o
\'JHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
\'JHEREAS, the Ci ty Council finds, after careful con-
sideration of the recommendations of the City Planning Commis-
sion and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a
conditional use permit is authorized by the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development
of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the
use is adequate to allow the full development of
the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to
the particular area nor to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and high-
ways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under
the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of
the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commis-
sion in grantinq said conditional use permit be, and the
same is hereby sustained , and that Conditional Use Permit
No. 1135 be, and the same is hereby, granted permitting
the establishment of a building having a height in excess of 75
feet (Height 190 feet) (Section 18.40.070 (3-c) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code) on the property hereinbefore described subject
to the following conditions:
1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject
to the completion of Reclassification No. 69-70-17.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2,
3, 4 and 5.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such Conditional Use Permit for good caus~ or failure of said
owner , ~ heirs, successors or assigns to comply
with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations and the
condition(s) herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this _-2.J&:t day of Octo~___, 19_6.2..
QUJ
ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
L
.2tL .~4~~~
C CLERK OF -H OF ANAHEIH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE
do hereby certify
adopted at a
day of October
members thereof:
M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
that the foregoing resolution was passed and
meeting of the City Council held on the 21st
, 19~, by the following vote of the
AYES:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Pebley & Clark
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCILHEN: Krein
NOES:
ABSENT:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 21st day of
October , 19 69.
-..--.---
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 21st
day of October, 1969 .
C~?tF 41~~AHEII"
( SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
69R-589 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on October
21,1969.
/j~L ~ ~.. ~~
City Clerk